Pick an Item and Knock over the Stumps | Full Task | Taskmaster
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 มิ.ย. 2024
- Pick an item and hit the stumps, feat. a justifiably smug Russell Howard.
------------
Follow the show at / taskmaster
Become a fan at / officialtaskmaster
Buy Taskmaster merch: taskmasterstore.com/
------------
In this Broadcast Award-winning, BAFTA and Emmy Award-nominated entertainment show, Taskmaster tyrant Greg Davies (Man Down, Cuckoo), with the help of his loyal assistant Alex Horne (The Horne Section and the show’s creator), sets out to test the wiles, wit and wisdom of five hyper-competitive comedians.
Comedians that have risked life, limb, and dignity in the hope of making the Taskmaster proud so far include: Frank Skinner (The Frank Skinner Show), Mel Giedroyc (The Great British Bake Off), Romesh Ranganathan (Asian Provocateur), Hugh Dennis (Outnumbered), Sally Phillips (Bridget Jones’ Diary), Rose Matafeo (Edinburgh Comedy Award Winner 2018), and Russell Howard (The Russell Howard Hour). Unaware of what awaits them in each wax-sealed envelope, only one competitor can become the victorious owner of His Royal Task-ness’ golden head and be crowned the next Taskmaster Champion. - ตลก
![[Watch Party] RoV APL 2024 Bacon VS TDT ( AlmonP Wanoiz )](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LvZvKzu3VSk/mqdefault.jpg)
Two things:
In cricket, Russel’s delivery is legal, which I’ll say is good enough for me. The whole foot has to be over the line to constitute a “no ball”
Secondly, I’m extra impressed by Russell because a rug half assedly rolled out over grass is a shit surface to bowl on
Two things: this isn't cricket, and the rules specifically said they had to be behind the first stump. Actual cricket rules are irrelevant.
1 thing: Bug eaters play cricket
From where it landed it would have been hard to miss, but at the distance a first time throw to the base of the stumps was decent ! I did come to the comments to see if people were talking about his foot being ahead of the stump but I quite like your explanation for it ! I just like it on the show when they zoom into the foot and call it out, but I can appreciate that most of the foot was behind the line
Pretty terrible to bat on too with that variable bounce!
@@NefariousPorpoise one could argue that he was behind, just not entirely behind.
Joe Wilkinson is going to be SO mad when he sees this.
HIS FOOT WAS PAST THE STUMP
You're allowed to have your foot on the line. Just can't be past it
@@D.Jay. SO WERE TIM'S HANDS
His foot was behind the stump when the throw was performed. The task didn't specify "You may not touch the red green!"
@@bball767 he was past the stump. completely against le rules.
Comments don't realize that it doesn't matter if his foot was on the thing, he still was behind the log
enough of his foot was behind the line to justify disqualification.
@@Dizz2K7 Except that wasn't part of the rules. At no point did the rules state you couldn't step on that thing
@@rainydeestar But the carpet was in front of the stump, therefore unless the carpet was moved, like Tim Vine moved it, stepping on the carpet means you are in front of the stump as well.
Godliman is often called the Bosh Queen, but lets not forget Tarbuck first claimed that crown!
Bosh of Thrones
Omg, I know it’s a comedy show (and one of my favourites) but did you get as infuriated as me when Tim and Asim did not listen to a sodding word she said? Solved it in a minute and completed the task solo 😂 properly fucking infuriating.. as Greg said, no one bit of telly has clearly shown the plight of women..
I find Godliman infinitely more likeable though. Perhaps that's why it endures for her.
@@TheLocalFuzz but the 🎂?!?@
Also RADA, which was Wokoma's catchphrase
All of these comments claiming Russell's attempt should be disallowed when his foot was clearly behind the crease during the delivery... that's a fair ball!
theyre talking about the toes on his left foot, because in a different but similar task someone was disqualified for the same thing
@@Achilles3666 I mean its very close. I think they're more lenient because Joe's was very clear cut where as this was hard to tell. Joe's throw was also in the hands of his competitors so its not like he was cheated by Greg.
@@Achilles3666 I mean, I know they are, but in cricket, that would still be a fair delivery since pretty much the entirety of the front foot landed behind the crease (here, the edge of the red carpet).
In other words, I am being pedantic and applying the laws of cricket
@@Achilles3666 The ruling says he must be behind the stick. Not that he cannot step on the carpet like in the other famous moment of the show. Even if his foot slightly went past, he was still behind it like the rules require.
The task stated to bowl from 'behind' the stump, there is no mention of a crease. He should have been disqualified, same as Joe Wilkinson, would have been comedy gold.
"I haven't seen these, but anyone who just grabbed the balls and threw them, that would be an act of mad stupidity..."
Don’t know anything about cricket but the only thing I know is that what Russell did was hot
Anyone who thinks Russell should be DQed forgets that the other contestants disqualified Joe Wilkinson, because they were dead inside.
Exactly , I remember Richard Osman made a case for the Taskmaster to allow Joes win, and it was smarmy Jon Richardson and two faced Doc Brown who voted against him.
Doc Brown clearly realised the humour in stabbing poor Joe in the back and then lying about it.
@@KitagumaIgen And he was right, it was one of the funniest things ever. He and Jon sympathizing with him when he came back was top tier hilarious
“You have to be behind the stump,” he’s behind the stump. Joe’s wording is that NOTHING can touch the green red, he did touch the green red and it was even put up for a vote, so it wasn’t even a TKO.
when Alex was singing / rapping at the end it sounded like the shipping forecast
Joe was DQed because he broke a rule and it played into his lovable loser character & was good TV. Russell was not DQed for breaking a rule because this is a light entertainment show and it made for good TV. Same as how the points don't matter on MTW and very few rules are enforced on EOOTCDC.
I agree. Its not the Olympics 😉 def edited for fun and entertainment value👍
Cricket has different rules when it comes to where the foot can be when bowling the ball and where the bowler can go after releasing the ball. This is not a difficult difference to grasp - or should not be a difficult difference to grasp...
There was no rule against touching the red carpet in this task, though. Otherwise, even Tim Vine would’ve been disqualified.
@@KitagumaIgen Since you're so smart, allow me to point some things out to you. This wasn't a sanctioned cricket match so cricket rules mean nothing. The task instructions stated "from behind this stump" which Russell didn't do. To further prove cricket rules don't apply the contestants were throwing a variety of objects that I'm guessing aren't legal in cricket. So, this isn't cricket and cricket rules don't matter. "This is not a difficult difference to grasp - or should not be a difficult difference to grasp.."
@@kantahanwithkahel True, but the instructions said, "behind this stump." The red carpet was on the other side of the stump. To step on the carpet, they had to pass the stump. By grabbing the carpet, Tim should have been technically DQed but as I already said they'll ignore rules for entertainment value. If they actually enforced all their own rules, no one would enjoy the show.
Love this show
I‘m not from an english speaking country and we don‘t play cricket here. What impresses me is that everyone of them knows how to throw the ball used for cricket
You just throw it. I can tell you only Russell threw it like an actual cricket player.
Cricket was invented in England. So it's a safe bet that most people have at least seen a ball bowled.
It's a small part of physical education class.
We did Cricket a lot in P.E. In both Primary and Secondary school
It's a safe assumption that given it's a British sport, Cricket was played during P.E. back in the 70s and 80s when Russell was most likely still in school
@@Sergeantmajormario 70s? fecking hell mate how old you think Russel is? he wouldn't even have started school intil the mid 80s and it'd still be another couple years on top of that before they started playing cricket. lol
Tim’s solution was honestly genius
Love Tim vine he is a comedy genius
Still waiting on the *These are intelligent people* compilation.
I think that would be like 5 hours long
When do we get the whole show back? Those were funny times 10 do to all the interaction of the cast members.
The game by game action and the final game.
This is a BRILLIANT show.
Ms. Tarbuck is savage!
I want to try this with bowling balls, outdoor bowling courses
Alice wasn’t exactly off to a great start considering she didn’t even know what a stump was 😂😂
Or an over...
@@jrd33 well lots of people don’t know what that is. I’ve played cricket competitions and I didn’t even know what an over is.
@@rachelcookie321 I don't believe you. You can't play cricket without knowing what an over is. It's integral to the rules of the game.
@@jrd33 which part do you not believe? That I don’t know what an over is or that I didn’t play cricket? I played cricket at a school competition two years in a row. Maybe I knew about an over then but I certainly don’t remember it. It’s not like I’m a professional, I only did two competitions and that’s all I’ve played.
Alive? Yeah, she still is.
Amazing how Liza foreshadowed both Kerry and Susan's catchphrases in this task
You have to have Max Fosh on the next season!
Really looking forward to that new streaming service that taskmaster is planning to start.
Sorry, that WHAT now? 😮😮😮
The spirit of Shane Warne was with him
Except that Shane Warne was still alive when this happened
Took me 5 min of reading comments about cricket to realize Russel didnt throw an apple
Bowling Shane
No ball he stood over the line
Russell's glasses aren't even that bad lol
"10 minutes 8 seconds it was a slow failure"
Slow failure is the best way to describe my sexlife
no clue here. im stumped.
We've found Jimmy and Broady's replacement
luckily the rules said from behind the stump and not that they couldn't touch the red
But the red was in front of the stump, so due to that they could not attempt while on the red unless it was moved.
@@TehGamesaver one foot was still behind the stump
I’d have used that tyre all day!!!
Not gonna lie, Russell, that was hot.
4:10 is bascially what I thought of first, but then I thought, "nope, not allowed to move the stumps".
So it comes down to the question, does that count as "move". I would say so.
Throwing something at the stumps also moves them. I think it's fine.
The task is not properly worded, I interpret it to mean that it is against the rules to relocate the stumps. It would be almost impossible to dislodge the bails at any distance with bumping the stumps otherwise.
Rugby, eh?
I still say bosh(no clue how it's spelt) and I live across the pond.
Can England call up Russel?
There are 2 types of people here in the comment section
1. People who do not know cricket and want Russel to be DQed.
2. People who understand cricket and say the the whole foot needs to be over the line for it to be a no ball.
My reply to the 1st group is to just enjoy the show and the stop calling it the greatest injustice in the world, and my reply to the 2nd group is that the law states that a part of your foot need to be behind the line for it to be a fair delivery not the whole foot must be beyonf the line. The line belongs to the umpire
There's also a third group of people in the comment section who think cricket rules apply when this isn't a game of cricket. They don't. The only rules that apply are the ones stated in the task.
My response is to point out that this has nothing whatsoever to do with cricket, nor the rules of cricket. The rules were clearly stated on the task "attempt must be made from behind the stump". The stump was fully behind the red carpet. Russell touched the red carpet when making his throw. Therefore, Russell was not fully behind the stump.
What many seem to have overlooked is that Tim also touched the carpet as part of his attempt. He was therefore also in front of the stump, and thus should be disqualified.
@@adamrobinson6951 I fully agree with you on your points about cricket, however you are also doing what they're doing and making your own rules up.
At no point do the rules say the person has to be fully behind the stump. As you point out, only the attempt had to be and the throw was from behind the stump. If you stand on the pavement and stick your toes off the kerb, are you standing in the road? No. If you then threw a ball to the opposite pavement, are you throwing it from the pavement or the road? The pavement.
Either way, it doesn't really matter as the Taskmaster made his decision long before we saw and the Taskmaster's decision is final.
I miss a good TM binge watching
The timing, rest in peace Shane Warne :|
Alice is stunning 😍
she sure is
I would’ve picked up the carpet the stumps were placed on bam stumps fall and then I throw the carpet anyways
"you can't move any stumps" Tim Vine proceeds to only move a stump. :-\
i thought they were going to disqualify howard when he was stepping on the red carpet there for standing closer than the pole that he had to throw from behind.
Could they have just gone behind all the goals and then threw something? Then they'd be behind all the stumps still.
A Shane Warne tribute? Hope so. ❤🏏
We might have another Joe Wilkinson potato moment here, right? Russell's foot was beyond the stick.
It just said make your attempt from behind the line, not that you can't go past the line. He releases the ball, then stepped past the line. Technically, the attempt was made from behind the line
@@robertcampbell8070 No mention of a 'line' is made in the task, they were supposed to bowl from behind the "stump". So he should have been disqualified as he was touching the red carpet when the ball left his hand.
Spotted that too, the task stated they had to be behind the stump. His foot was touching the red carpet as it left his hand. Should have disqualified him like Joe Wilkinson, would have been comedy gold. "Get up and take a bow Russell." "Shall we see it again?""Oh, that's a shame!" "All the points go to Tim Vine".
Unlike the Joe Wilkinson moment, here the distance is big enough that it doesn't make a difference. Furthermore his body was behind the stump so don't see a problem there. There was nothing about not touching the red carpet.
@@14KoniAK It did state to be BEHIND the stump - he wasn't.
R.I.P Shane Warne 😢
Wow
I would argue that Alice and Asim were the only ones that should've gotten any points at all. As can be heard on: 00:47 no stumps may be moved. Seeing as Alice and Asim were the only ones not to hit the stumps, they were the only ones that didn't move the stumps.
My interpretation is that the stumps cannot be picked up and moved. Even in real Cricket, I doubt any professional player could knock a bale off without causing a slight movement to the stumps.
Oh I understand, that's not the point I'm trying to make, just giving my view on a possible interpretation which could've led to a cheeky win if brought up hehe
@@Bbram155 I see :)
Chabuds, stick to peanut dust, bro.
Did no one see Russell's foot go past the stick?
It just said make your attempt from behind the line, not that you can't go past the line. He releases the ball, then stepped past the line. Technically, the attempt was made from behind the line.
@@robertcampbell8070 left foot mate
@@defeqel6537 the task doesn't say anything about stepping past the line, it says the attempt must be made from behind the line. Look at where his body is when he releases the ball. He's at best even with the line.
@@robertcampbell8070 pause it at 6:31 you'll see the ball is still in his hand while his foot was past the stump. I call for VAR review
@@JajaofAbuja yes, half of his foot and nothing else. You can actually slow it down and see that when he releases the ball, everything but that half of his foot is behind the line. The rule doesn't say you can go past the stumps, it says you must make your attempt. It's semantics. As an example, if he laid down, with the bottom half of his body past the stumps and the top half behind the stumps, and flicks the ball with his arm still behind the stumps, was the attempt behind the line? At the end of the day, the rules of this task could be interpreted in different ways, while for Joe they were very specific.
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
As a New Zealander I'd like to apologise for our version of Task Master.
✌️🇳🇿❤️
For series 2 being one of the best of the whole franchise?
WTF, it's a masterclass...?
Why? Season 2 was gold. It’s among the best of all Taskmaster
NZ taskmaster is phenomenal, what you talking about?
For not starting sooner?
They allowed Russel's throw, but they cancelled Joe Wilkinson's potato throw? That's the greatest injustice in the history of Taskmaster
It just said make your attempt from behind the line, not that you can't go past the line. He releases the ball, then stepped past the line. Technically, the attempt was made from behind the line
@@robertcampbell8070 6:31 it wasn't. he had the same amount of foot on the carpet/past the stump as joe did.
@@tdarkhorse4 Yes, but it doesn't say anything about stepping past the line, just that the attempt must be made from behind the line. Watch his body. He's at best equal with the line when he releases the ball.
I guess its a question of semantics. In Joe's task it was clearly mentioned that you must not touch the red-green. While in this task, it just says attempt must be from behind the stump, which it was...
@@robertcampbell8070 his foot is past the stump. you clearly aren't aware of how diagonal planes work, but as a general rule you have to trace up the diagonal from certain viewpoints when you want to see where objects would be relative to each other in a standard xyz cartesian plane. if you were to trace the diagonal, you'd find he did in fact step past the stump.
Anyone else think Alice is smoking hot
Your mum.
This is the internet. The answer to "does anyone think ___ is hot?" is always yes. The only thing that changes is how many yeses there are.
@@willb5278 wow bill. I thought I met the world's biggest loser before but u proved me wrong
@@willb5278 Really? Ok then.
Anyone think Susan Boyle is smoking hot? Where's your Internet now then
@@jameswest4692
(had to google her) I mean, I don't. But GILF is a thing some people like, age and weight isn't gonna stop the weirdos out there.
Most guys don't find "old" or "fat" to be a positive thing (Me included). But there's a kink for literally everything XD. Someone not being classically beautiful means there are FEWER people that want to fuck them. Not 0.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣
alice is fit
So is yer mum.
Hot take: Potatogate is overrated.
I’m surprised no one moved the stick
Literally said in the task that you couldn't.
Ohhh but his toe was past the stump
Why are old videos being recycled?
6:37 his foot was ON the carpet.
that girl is so funny. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ........ pissing my pants , ha ha ha ha ha😑
You won't call the foot foul here on Tim, but did on the potato in the hole.... hmmm rigged
Because per cricket it was legal
@@lmnopq7924 this isn't cricket. This is taskmaster. It clearly says behind the line. Just like the potato one said
@@Jakefromstakefarm potato one is unambiguous. You cannot touch the red. This one is ambiguous as the 'attempt' must be from behind the stump but what does that actually mean? Tim was more beyond the stump than Russell, both hands. They seem satisfied that his attempt was behind the stump.
Russel clearly broke the rules
Nope, legal per cricket
@@lmnopq7924 This isn't cricket, this a Taskmaster challenge. 0:30 The time stamp explains the rules of this game. I mean granted I know very little about cricket, but I'm fairly certain you can't tie some string round the stump and tug the bails off, or DonkyKong style barrel rolling. In this case all attempts had to be from behind the stump to which Russel wasn't. 6:28 This time stamp is Russells attempt he slightly steps infront with his standing leg then follows through further plus his arm is infront of stump at the point of release. To further prove my point see Joe Wilkinson potato hole in one for rule stickling.
Stay behind the stump….why no disqualification for Howard..as you did Wilkinson on the spud hole in one..? Cheeky.
Different situations and different rules. The rule for this didn't say you had to stay behind the stump, whereas for Joe they did say not to touch the red carpet.
@@Elwaves2925 pretty sure it said ‘ from behind this stump’
@@therickpound You're missing the important bit. The "attempts must be made from behind this stump." i.e. The throw or whatever. It said nothing about the person. He could have laid on the red carpet with just his arm behind the stump and it still would have counted.
His foot was clearly past the fist stump. This should have been the potato tragedy V2
Russell stepped with half a foot in front of the stump though. Just saying...
Come on Little Alex Horne, his foot is on the 🟥carpet when the ball left his hand. The task stated they had to be behind the stump. Should have disqualified him like Joe Wilkinson, would have been comedy gold. "Get up and take a bow Russell." "Shall we see it again?""Oh, that's a shame!" "All the points go to Tim Vine". I know it's 4 years ago, but you need to bring him back and take the points off him.
You might want to recheck the rules because they didn't state that.
@@Elwaves2925 You couldn't go past the stump. The carpet is past the stump. Ergo, on the carpet = past the stump.
@@InterrogatingTheCat That's not the rule, listen to what they actually said, not what you think they said. The rule said the attempt must be made from behind the stump, in Russ's case that would be the throw. At no point did it say the person had to be behind the stump. 🙂
"you must make your attempt from behind this stump" vs 6:30. he stepped in (left foot, even before the throw / releasing the ball, play in slowmo to see it clearly).
if the golf potato was a botched attempt for Joe then... just sayin'...
Joe's instructions were to not touch the red green. The instructions for this task didn't include that. Apples and oranges.
This is one of the worst things I've seen in my life.
What astounds me is some people's inability to actually throw a ball 66 feet......... never mind the accuracy, my ten year old could do better......
If you go to 6:38 you will clearly see that Russell stepped on the red carpet and broke the rules. No points.
The rule just said you have to be behind the stump, which he was.
It's a shame that this series of taskmaster was so bad... Russell Howard was stuck a rubbish group. Tim Vine and Liza Tarbuck were terrible.
Tim Vine was comedy gold, probably the most memorable contestant on the show.
Alice was ffing useless
Whaaa? I can understand not liking the other 4 but Tim was great
The best contestant ever on taskmaster was Joe Wilkinson...no competition. Tim Vine is just irritating and only occasionally funny.
So..
You guys made a streaming service and want americans to pay 5.99 a month to watch videos you decided not to allow to be viewed over here on TH-cam.
All of a sudden i really don't want to support you.
Hi Robert. Episodes will remain on TH-cam as normal. The most recent series will be available on TH-cam and Taskmaster SuperMax+ in the US and the rest of the world soon.
First, how is that different from Hulu, WWE Network, Peacock, etc...? Second of all, their stuff. you don't like it, don't talk bullshit, do the honorable thing and just fucking leave. Forget about you not wanting to support Taskmaster, I don't want you in my country anymore.