He is so gullible. He thinks Jesus Christ is real. What a dupe. Doesn't know fiction when he reads it. Does he think Harry Potter is really too? What a skully
Jesus was announced as king of Israel in that choice between Jesus and Barabbas. Quickly said, Pilot dressed Jesus up as King, Pilot presented Jesus to the Sanhedrin and high priest among the crowd as "their King". Told the crowd to choose to crucify "their King" or Barabbas. The Saducees and High Priest chose "their king" Jesus to be crucified and instigated the Jewish crowd to choose "their King" to be crucified..... and so the Priesthood anointed Jesus as their king in order for him to be executed. And Pilat published this fact above Jesus head at a time when Jerusalem was most crowded of Jews from all over the realm. What this accomplished was to legalize according to Torah law Jesus' amended covenant and make irrelevant all burdensome Talmudic rules. I think Jesus and Pilat planned it together. Neet trick on the Sanhedrin huh.
Conversation between Mary and CP (Child Person) CP: Who is your God? Mary: Yahweh CP: Who is the God of your child? Mary: Yahweh is the God of Jesus CP: Why? Mary: There was only one holy book when Jesus was born, which is the Torah. And teaching God is Yahweh and nothing else. CP: Then Mary: I still teach him that God is Yahweh. CP: Can he be God? Mary: Previously, there was Pharaoh and Nimrud who claimed to be gods. I didn't make a mistake the second time CP: Ok, next Mary: Jesus was very weak as a child, dependent on others, I fed him. This is not the nature of God. I hope everyone understand
@@kebenaransejati2808 Jesus was announced as king of Israel in that choice between Jesus and Barabbas. Quickly said, Pilot dressed Jesus up as King, Pilot presented Jesus to the Sanhedrin and high priest among the crowd as "their King". Told the crowd to choose to crucify "their King" or Barabbas. The Saducees and High Priest chose "their king" Jesus to be crucified and instigated the Jewish crowd to choose "their King" to be crucified..... and so the Priesthood anointed Jesus as their king in order for him to be executed. And Pilat published this fact above Jesus head at a time when Jerusalem was most crowded of Jews from all over the realm. What this accomplished was to legalize according to Torah law Jesus' amended covenant and make irrelevant all burdensome Talmudic rules. I think Jesus and Pilat planned it together. Neet trick on the Sanhedrin huh.
Most likely, the very last thing Jesus of Nazareth would have wanted to be remembered as would be: "God". "Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone." Doesn't sound like he's speaking of himself.
@@eklypised Every single one of Jesus’ followers were Jews. So what do you mean by “why did the Jews want to kill Jesus?” All Jews wanted Jesus dead? No. Only some specific people in positions of power probably viewed Jesus as a threat. The vast majority of Jews did not know who he was or care about what he was saying, which is why his followers were few in numbers and poor. Why does anyone want to kill anyone else? What lead to Christian’s killing Christian’s? There’s myriad reasons to such a question. The best theory I’ve heard as to why the temple authorities handed him to the romans (who did the actual killing) was because they were afraid that if he caused a rebellion the entire Jewish race would be punished as a result. Hard to say they were wrong, if they did indeed think that, given what later happened during the great Jewish revolt and the bar kokbah revolt. These two revolts and their consequences changed the face of Judaism forever and were the beginning of a long history of tragedies in the hands of European kingdoms and empires.
@@eklypised Your questions are good ones and I think a good place to begin answering them is found in this video, beginning with time-marker 3:04ff. “…for many Jews it was impossible to separate the social and political realities of military occupation and economic oppression from Jewish piety and Faith. The Jewish belief that the people of Israel have been chosen by God to become a model nation that would exemplify Justice and Righteousness to the entire world was fundamental. The Hebrew prophets had predicted that in the last days all nations would go up to Jerusalem to learn about the one true, creator God, irresistibly drawn by Israel's moral example of peace and justice. Not all Jews accepted such an idealistic vision but enough did that John the Baptizer, Jesus and his brother James were able to spark a movement that threatened the highest levels of the political and religious establishment. (To me, this last sentence is the key: John, Jesus, James and their movement threatened the highest levels of political and religious power.)
@@eklypised for the same reason you want him to be killed (than to say it was sacrificed) rather save him. I find it amazing you ask a question why Jew wanted to kill him, so you know it was an incident of killing a person. Not a incident of willing sacrifice by any parties. Not by killer and not by the person who was killed. Can you sacrifice anything without the intention of doing a sacrifice? No parties know. If a person claim to be god we say He is mad 😡, we don't kill him. Last thing an empire would do to kill a person who claimed to be god. He was killed cuz his voice was against oppression. If You don’t understand what he was fighting for? Than you know nothing about his life.
Paul is responsible for disconnecting from Judaism and the Roman emperor Constantine took Christianity to another new level which was never intended by Jesus.
Too much credit is given to Constantine for shaping the Bible formation and formation of Christianity. The formation of Christianity. Was a long process. Jesus should have been enough just as he was. Paul turned things upside down, thus making western Christianity “Pauline” Christianity. I am inspired by the stories of Jesus, but I do not care for Paul and his teachings.
- The Gospel of Jesus was originally one book, written by Lazarus in consultation with the Apostles [John 21:24] and published soon after Jesus left them on their own. The religion was hijacked by Rome, the Gospel was broken up scrambled adulterated into a bunch of competing narratives. Later four of those adulterated gospels were canonized with falsely ascribed authorship and a Gnosticism cover-story. It was the finding of an original Gospel of Jesus scroll in Jerusalem that gained the Knights Templar power over the Church and their eventual undoing when the church finally retaliated against them Friday 13th.
And who cares? Some people act like a first century Jew would have such an amazing wisdom that surpasses generations. It doesn't, just a human and he was also wrong is so many ways.
We must not forget of Paul's encounter with Jesus Christ. Paul was not teaching a different Christianity. He was implicitly being led by God The Holy Spirit who was sent by God, The Son, namely Jesus Christ.
@10:10 circumcised at the Jewish temple in Jerusalem? There was never any association or requirement for circumcision to be performed at the temple. Not sure where Tabor got this from
Dr. Tabor's book "The Jesus Dynasty" is a must read for those searching for the historical versus the theological Jesus. Warning, if your faith is tied to the Jesus myth constructed by European Christianity then you may wish to pass on this book but if you are in search of historical and archaeological evidence interpreted and presented in a scholarly but readable fashion about Jesus prophet and jew then this book will be both fascinating and illuminating.
No ! what i found lol not a Jew as in Babylonian Jews King of the Druids King Arthur Carleon-Upon-Usk in Gwent, Wales This is where Arthur was crowned and held his first court, presiding over a rich company including liveried knights and their ladies. The present site contains the ruins of a fine Roman amphitheatre and extensive buildings. a round temple table lol Link to king of Greece Theseus Aegeus Aigeús, also spelled Aegeas) Rock of destiny Stone of scone Christ rock Galatia or Galilee The Galatians were a Celtic people dwelling in Galatia, a region of central Anatolia surrounding present-day Ankara, during the Hellenistic period.
@@allmightlionthunder5515 The Celtic people from Britain and Ireland are from the 10 Jewish Tribes. The lady at the well, knew Jesus was a Jew. Above Jesus on the Crucifix, it stated... King of The Jews. There are many other scriptures that document that. Nazarenes were Christian Jews. Many Jews, have realized that Jesus is Their Jewish Messiah. The Jewish Bloodline runs through The British Kings and Queens ⚜️🐝✡️🦁
@@grit1679 Saying your a fellow Celt that doesn't know history lol Then you do not get it do you so tell me you do not know Celtic , Briton and roman and Greek history . Galatia or Galilee The Galatians were a Celtic people dwelling in Galatia, a region of central Anatolia surrounding present-day Ankara, during the Hellenistic period.
That's the first time I've heard of Dr. Tabor being called a saint, but if saints exist in these modern times, Dr. Tabor should certainly be considered for canonization! I have an excellent BS detector and nothing he says seems to budge my meter! I'm very thankful for his scholarly prowess!
Mathew 23 :13-31. Leonardo da Vinci said " The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions " Plato shared with us wisdom he learnt from Egypt, wisdom that was a death sentence in Greece, Rome ( Christianity) .. Pythagoras, Socrates and later Hypatia of Alexandria. Plato in his dialogue " The Republic " tells the allegory of " The Cave " Plato starts by telling us of prisoners being held in a sort of underground den, let us examine this den via the geometry of Bernhard Riemann and Felix Klein.. Klein bottle..3rd and 4th dimensions. Plato tells us that the prisoners are bound up unable to move their heads, let us examine this bondage via the psychology of Erich Fromm.. socialisation of consciousness..aware-unaware. Plato tells us that the prisoners mistake shadows for substance, let us examine this mistake via the philosophy of Thales and Kant..synthetic a priori..not thing in itself. Plato tells us that one of the prisoners is released, let us examine this release via the instructions given by T.Lobsang Rampa..stilling the mind- seek first the Kingdom of God..conscious astral travel- leaving the cave/body. John 8: 32. Plato tells us that the prisoners will reject this release, let us examine this rejection via the psychological effects of Stockholm syndrome..Mathew 7: 21-23.. Plato quotes Homer " Better to be a poor man, and have a poor master, and endure anything, than to think and live after their manner " Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds. Mathew 7: 1-12.
The religion of Jesus is the same religion of Abraham. Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian. Abraham was someone who submitted to the will of his Creator which is definition of a muslim.
The patriarchs and Moses were dealing with a god (son of god), Elohim or Anunnaki (cf. Deut. 32:8-9). The Most High conferred Jacob or Israel upon Yahweh as his inheritance among the 70 nations.
The earlier idols (false deities) were statues erected of pious people of previous generations. These people were later wrongly prayed to and taken as deities. These type of misguided beliefs of taking humans as deities or gods exist in pagan and polytheist religions, past and present. A human taking another human as a deity or God is falsehood. It makes absolutely no sense for a human to pray to (worship) another human. Deity Incarnation where a human is believed to be a deity or God coming down in this world as a human is among the misguided claims in pagan and polytheist religions, past and present. Claiming a human is God manifest as a human is among the misguided claims in pagan and polytheist religions. Claiming a spirit in a human is a deity or God is among the misguided claims in pagan and polytheist religions. Claiming God having sons or daughters is among the misguides claims in pagan and polytheists religions. All that I mentioned about idolatry, pagan and polytheist religions you can look it up online including from their own sources. The misguided belief of taking Jesus as a deity or God is against what Jesus himself believe and taught. It is against what all the guided prophets that include Noah, Abraham and Moses believed and taught. It is against the foremost of the religion which is the first and foremost commandment. Abraham did not pray to Jesus which is a man's name. Abraham did not pray to three persons. God is not a human God created humans As great a human Jesus is, he still is human.
To understand the relevance of Jesus let's just study Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy. Without ignoring passages, altering punctuation, rearranging scripture, relying on obscure extra-biblical apostates, or imaginary calendar keeping, a plain reading of Dan 9:25, 26 shows that from Artaxerxes I decree to Ezra to take all the volunteers he wanted and return with them to Judah and Jerusalem, and further giving Ezra authority over the region and substantial funds, wasn't just a fact finding trip - it was to restore Jerusalem. From which event, simple addition of 69 weeks of years yields the baptism ("anointing") of Jesus Christ in A.D. 26, all consistent with history and His age, length of ministry and crucifixion ("cutting off") in A.D. 30, the only year in which the gospel accounts of Passion Week can be harmonized and reconciled with calendars. Daniel 9:25, 26 is in fact fulfilled Messianic prophecy is clearly fulfilled in Jesus. You will now say it's coincidence. Just like it's coincidence he was born in Bethlehem. Was pierced, smitten, entered Jerusalem on a donkey, bones not broken etc. All that coincidence? Even the great prophecy in Daniel? Really?
Ya know, I respect Dr Tabor's expertise, but wonder how much stock he'd put on "Jesus came from the line of David," as actual History? I understand if that's the way Jesus (or the interpreter of His life) felt, but it really seems a LONG way from the actual time of King David to be verifiable in ANY way...that's My take.
Thought I would pitch in here. Firstly, David might or might not have existed as a real king or human being. Perhaps he is just a legend. If he did exist, I doubt the veracity or reliability of any stories written *down about him (effectively 400-500 years later in Babylon). But let’s assume he was king of a minor state in and around Jerusalem. It is written that he hat several children, as did his supposed son Solomon. In the intervening 800-900 years, given the way generics work in small populations, the odds are that Jesus would have been able to claim some sort of lineage back to David, probably via both parents. But then so would most of the population in that area. So it’s not that relevant, unless one is wanting to retro-engineer a ‘prophesy’ and use it as proof about a specific messianic claim. Even finding evidence of biblical figures or habitations in no way validates the religious claims in scripture. After all, we have *proof that Egyptian pharaohs existed. Their literature claims they are also gods. All of the Ceasers existed. They were worshiped as gods too. As were figures across cultures and time. Do we accept those claims as being divine truth? Outside a few devotees, I’d say no. So why believe the god of the Bible is any more real? Sorry, that became a bit of a rant.
Perhaps it is referring to the corrupted genome of humans, and our Creators purpose and progression to bring about a human Elohim Prince to by perfecting human ability to rule/ judge the other Elohim that abused their separate powers ….Logos, the interface between the Elohim family, was perfected by becoming human and totally reliant on His Creator/Father for his existence…
It would be interesting if you could do a video on Samaritan beliefs, and the beliefs in general of 1st temple Yahwehism when all the tribes helped build the temple. Too bad the Jews from babylon didn't let the Samaritans help build the 2nd temple. I think Samaritans show how belief in Yahweh was never limited to the tribe if Judea and is universal
The Temple of Jesus' time was not the second temple. Jesus' time was Herod's temple the THIRD temple. The Jewish Sect of the Nazarine wanted that temple's services ended which meant wanting that temple destroyed.
@@brisadelcastillo2840 Original built during Solomon's reign. 2nd after return from exile in Babylon, Then Herod completely reengineered the whole of the Temple Mount, sweeping away the 2nd Temple and building a bigger grander temple in Herod's own honor.
Jesus did not 'move beyond it' - as if to abandon it - that would be error. He was trying to show that the Lord does ALL THINGS (Isaiah 45: 7), and that all were as such 'bound by their actions' to the law, and elevated the requirements of it to a spiritual level, whereby the fruits of a persons actions (what comes out of a man) defiled him. The law cannot be enforced by the letter, as you would have to break it in order to fulfill it. This is what Jesus wrote in the sand... Exodus 21:12 or (but less likely) Leviticus 24:17 The 'scales' that fell from Saul's eyes, were the scales of rights to judge. Evil has a purpose - it's the most enjoyable way to learn what NOT to do. I have THE 'theodicy' sir... and I welcome you to discuss it with me. The world 'needs' it. And it is time. Musante... mus 'A' nte Musa (Moses) Etna (Mountain of Fire) Anytime will do. Shalom.
Finally the truth about Jesus & Judaism. He followed the Old Testament. Christianity ignored his Jewishishness & altered his beliefs from Israel & changed it according to a new scripture he knew nothing of.
Jesus rejected certain "rabbinic" interpretations? the rabbinic tradition was a response to the Roman's destruction of the Temple, a generation after Jesus' Crucifixion, so there were no "rabbinic" interpretations for Jesus to reject or accept.
We’ve got the Shroud and we know exactly what Jesus looked like. Also we have the Divine Mercy image which Jesus Himself told Sr Faustina to have painted. All facial dimensions match the Shroud.
@@arriuscalpurniuspiso we call this blasphemy and I shall pray for your soul. For those who believe, no proof is necessary, for those who don’t believe, no proof is possible.
@@billyhomeyer7414 our current scholarship proves who wrote the NT. It was the Piso Family. And the NT is nothing more than imperial Roman propaganda designed to kill the Jews
Once thing possible, somewhere between Egypt and Saudi Arabia, between the Mediterranean and Red Seas, an analytically viable source of his dna is currently resting. Rest in Peace whoever you were.
Unbelievable though it might seem, there is an alternate view. "Jesus the Phoenician" by Karim El Koussa. What did Jesus mean when he said, "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." What did he mean when he said to the Jews, "Whither I go, ye cannot come." Or John 8:44? The history of Jesus is like the history of the Israelites ... complex.
You're saying, "Jesus can not have been the 'Jesus of the Bible'." where Paul and his letters painted Jesus as a Gentile-friendly Bringer of Peace rather than a terrorist of the Jewish Revolt Era. Right?
Even it is debated that he was a jew. First, his belive and teaching was universal and not connected to one nation. Second, in Galilea mostly not jews were living at that time. Even the word Galilea means: land of goys, means land of not jews.
Why do religious people/scholars and the like still continue to refer to Jesus/Iēsos by this name when we now know his Hebrew name is Yeshua??? He should be called by the name he used in his time period and the name everyone called him by should he not????
Can you imagine how the world would look like today if the Romans had not invaded Judea (labeled Israel today). The name Palestine is derived from the name Palaestina a name given to Judea by the Romans to avoid the return of the Jewish kingdom.
... which was shortly after the Bar Kochba revolt. The word "Filistina" *did* exist to refer to a people who were neighbors to the Egyptians, but scholars now believe those references may refer to the people known as the Philistines in the Bible.
Exactly, Moses and the other Prophet's books were supposedly preserved by miraculous intervention, to ensure the truth remains even after the corruption of humanity. Yet there is no Jesus Book??? The new testament claims it is, but in reality it is a gathered selection of others writting, not the word for word writtings of Jesus at all!
The silly portrayal of Jesus starting at 0:50 is based on Joan Taylor's book, "What Did Jesus Look Like." Taylor constructed her ridiculous image of Jesus by tritely dismissing the Shroud of Turin as authentic. She bought into Dr. McCrone's "painting" theory and then opined that the images on the Shroud were the result of a medieval penitential rite. Her book is full of errors and makes no sense. Dr. Tabor is also a Shroud denier, and perhaps that is why he has posted Taylor's supposed image of Jesus throughout this video.
Of course it is. But art history also places it in the sixth century, so include the 14th, 13th, 12th, 11th, 10th, 9th, 8th, and 7th centuries in your evaluation. @@chibibeetle
The God of the Jews said: Isaiah 46:9-10 "Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me. Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure." And He will not change His mind: Numbers 23:19 God is not human, that He should lie, not a human being that He should change His mind. Does He speak and then not act? Does He promise and not fulfill? Where are the followers of the **renowned and powerful people at their time**? The Nazis, Stalinists, even followers of Elvis Presley? Why is the Man so hated by most of His people, the Jews,. and His early followers were hiding because of persecution, and were fed by the Romans to lions for entertainment (which should have effectively stop their growth, the spread of Christianity, followers of Jesus CHRIST), why is He still famous today and His followers are now in billions? Because God fulfilled His promise?, that **through** the offspring of Isaac, and Jacob/Israel, A JEW, will ALL NATIONS on earth be blessed, Genesis 26:4, 28:14. The God of the Jews never commanded the Jews to proselyte. But we came to know their God (the Bible contains the old testament, the Torah of the Jews) through THE JEW, Jesus Christ who commanded His followers to proclaim the gospel to the world.
I absolutely love speculating what kinda Jew Jesus was tend to side with Robert Eisenman's view which was he seemed to be on the more militant side, so I'm guessing Zealot. He hasn't convinced me the Qumran material is Jameseon, but that he and his brother are alot more strict Jews than Paul and the only thing that survived after the Pax Romana was what was allowed by Rome. That's my take and thank you Dr Tabor for keeping the debate going!
Yeshua was a Torah-observant, Torah-teaching Rabbi who taught the true meaning of the Torah which has LOVE as it's Modus Operandi; Love for the Father (vertical- cross-beam) and Love for one's neighbor (horizontal- stake). His AUTHORized teaching of the Torah was "easy and (His) yoke is light" which set it apart in ways from the many additions and subtractions in the Pharisee's Oral Torah.
@@michaelsmith9453 This is mindless. vacuous and uninformed witnessing which contains no information and has no value. You don't know anything about Jesus OR the Torah. You're just making stuff up. Roman crosses had no standardized design, by the way. Usually the cross-beam went across the top like a capital T. Sometimes there was no crossbar. In no case was there ever any love involved or implied.
@@Ken_Scaletta Lol! Why are you so uptight Ken? By just alluding to the execution stake, cross or whatever you want to describe it as causes you to foment at the mouth? You need some stability in your life. 🙏🙏🙏
This is a channel about genuine scholarship. It's not a train platform. If you're going to proselytize at least know what you're talking about. You show no respect for the scholar or for scholarship when you barge in just to shout slogans. If you're going to preach, at least make a reasoned, cited academic argument for it. If you're going to say a cross stands for love, back that up with something. Do some research on acrostics in Jewish or Greek literature. You might be able to manufacture a pseudo-academic argument. I've seen worse. "Torah is love." Do you write Hallmark cards? Torah says to kill people if they pick up sticks on a Saturday.
Who ever Jesus was has been totally corrupted by the church and the writing of Paul. Can we truly believe any gospel when we know they were written way after the life of Jesus anonymously. I wonder could Jesus have been literate as he dame from a poor family. The notion he was God is really not in the bible if he did believe that he would have been killed along time before he was by his peers, not by Pontius Pilate.
"political/religious establishment" - ??? trying to bifurcate the matter? It's simply retelling how to observe who is blessed from who has cursed themselves - according to the TEACHING of Elohim.
@@jamesmason8944 O Adam, inhabit the Garden, you and your wife, and eat from wherever you wish, and do not approach this tree, lest you be among the wrongdoers. So Satan whispered to them about me. What was hidden from them of their evils was revealed to them, and He said, “Your Lord has not forbidden you from this tree unless you become angels or become among the immortal.” *And he swore to them, “Indeed, I am to you who are sincere.” So he treated them with deceit, and when they tasted the tree, their evil deeds became apparent to them, and they began to cover themselves with the leaves of Paradise. Their Lord called to them, “Did I not forbid you from that tree and tell you that Satan is your clear enemy?” They said, “Our Lord, we have wronged ourselves, and if you do not forgive us.” And have mercy on us, we will surely be among the losers.* He said, “Go down.” Some of you are enemies to others, and for you in the land is a place of rest and enjoyment for a while.
Thank you, James. You have done much work. 🙏 Would you be open to other explanations (explanations that only a relative few on earth know about-perhaps an explanation by the ascended consciousness of Jesus)? When reading, you will learn how such communication was accomplished, which scientists can now explain. Please search for CHRIST’S LETTERS from CHRIST’S WAY online (including in various social media platforms). The pieces will surely fall into place. Blessings!
After decades of trying to convert mainly Protestants from "Christianity" to the true teachings and practices of Jesus, I also have come to the foundational realization that Jesus was not a "Christian" but a Jew. and too many Christian doctrines, such as "Original Sin" and an eternal hell, for example, were not exactly what Jesus would have advocated as a Jew. Of course, this needs fleshing out and more research.
Jesus was never a flesh person. That which is born of the flesh is flesh that which is born of Spirit is spirit Now the birth of Jesus was in this wise, When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. Which means Virgins don't have babies... The child of promise us born in you, which you must crucify(the flesh desires) so it is no longer you that lives but Christ in you. Be less Christian and be more Christ
Seems like so few “Christians” actually understand who Jesus was at all. Thus the religious legalists and literalists and tradition bound claim righteousness to this day while becoming everything Jesus defied and despised. It’s that simple really. Legalists never change.
Modern day Christian churches ignore the fact Jesus was a Jew, born, lived and died a Jew. If we want to be like Jesus we need to give it bit of thought.
Isaac only when you look at what Paul is saying in his letters, it states clearly only the children of Isaac can receive the promise,.. This is why the scribes and Pharisees were persecuting them, you see the scribes and Pharisees were actually the children of Ishmael... and Paul was basically saying they were not included.. Genesis 16:12And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren. Galatians 4:28¶Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. 29But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. 30Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. Also note.. Paul in the passages below states, just because people are the children of Abraham doesn't make them heirs to the promises, Paul goes on to say that only the children of Isaac could receive the promises which the letters a referencing... Let me also add, Paul would not write letters to people at Rome about the Affairs of a bloodline covenant, if these Gentiles at Rome were not the" bloodline of Isaac" .......(The northern house)....... Let's review. Romans 9 7Neither, because they are the bloodline of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy bloodline be called. 8That is, They which are the children of the flesh,= Ishmael ) are not the children of God: but the children of the promise=( Isaac) are counted for the bloodline. 9For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. Note, Paul in Romans 9:9 refers you to Genesis 17:21 confirming it's their bloodline Covenant which is indeed being referenced.. Genesis 17:21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year. Now this doesn't mean you can't have salvation, but it does mean you can't have part in the promises it's referencing from the letters.. Such as being part of the body of Christ, the Eternal priesthood for example... But you can be a fellow citizen in a finished Kingdom with a finished eternal Temple which now makes intercession from the clouds of Heaven as we speak.. As the children of Isaac , the corporate body of Christ has inherited all things and now control the New Covenant as the Saints of Heaven.... Romans 4 13¶For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. Isaiah 49 8¶Thus saith the LORD, In an acceptable time have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I helped thee: and I will preserve thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages.. Isaiah 54:3For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles, and make the desolate cities to be inhabited.
the only thing about the type of jew he was is debatable(depending on if the ad biblical texts are true that is) jesus would be more a rabbinical type figure practicing/preaching the school of Hillel.. example,, abolishing ALL commandments set before & then only following/preaching only the ten commandments or Noah’s/Adams
Following Jewish law Jesus fulfilled the law and opened the door of his grace and law of holy spirit Jesus did many miracles on Sabbat and explained to the leader the true spirit of Sabbath God Bless you
You open by saying Jesus “read” the scriptures in Hebrew. Isn’t it most likely that Jesus was illiterate, as were most of the population. Didn’t he speak Aramaic? I believe that you, yourself, have said that only the upper class and elites were literate, that there was no school in Nazareth.
This is shattering. I thought Jesus was a Roman Catholic. Of course geza vermes said all this in his ground breaking book of 1971." Jesus there Jew". So nothing new here. But well done to james for making scholarship available
One of the problems with this narrative is that it was not Palestine at the time of Jesus. Also, Jesus said that He and the Father are one. If you had seen Him, you would have seen the Father. Sounds like He claimed to be God to me. Plus all the Apostles claimed that he was God, and died to prove it.
Jesus read the 24 books of the Tanakh (OT39) but ALSO the 70 hidden Hebrew books. He was vehemently opposed to Pharisees and their traditions of the elders
Not really to your last sentence. Jesus references the oral Torah, several times throughout the gospels. He was against how the Levitical priests, put the Talmudic tradition above the scriptures.
When a person is spiritually worthy, only then are they blessed. A person is never blessed or shines, just because they call themselves so, that is a contradiction! Why christi-anity is it's own anti-christ! An arrogant movement that destroys people's opportunity to come closer to the True God, it instead created a fake God it calls the jesus trinity!
WHY IS HE ALWAYS PORTRAIT HAS A MAN WITH A BEARD AND NAILED TO A CROSS 25 DEC AS HIS BIRTHDAY, THE CUSTOMS IN ROMAN TIMES WAS HAIR CUT SHORT AND WHY DID THE GUARD ASK TO POINT HIM OUT!!!!!!!!!
A couple of tiny misapprehensions... (1) Most families could not remotely afford to make all of the pilgrimages to Jerusalem every year; you lose too many workdays just coming and going and leave the home village unoccupied and unprotected - depending on how far away they were and their specific means, they made as many pilgrimages to Jerusalem as possible. To do otherwise is to create the conditions for starvation. The farmers needed to tend their crops and animals, it's as simple as that. Perhaps you could get a neighbor to tend yours for a week, probably in return for tending theirs. Otherwise, in subsistence agriculture, somebody is going to starve to death. See the importance of human life, below. Now as a single, healthy, male with no family responsibilities and a trade (not a farmer) it would have been easier for Jesus to make the pilgrimage than it was for most; but the same would be true of any other single, healthy male who was not a farmer. It's not remarkable in any way. (2) There is no reason to suppose that Jesus (or most anybody els) was circumcised at the Temple. It was then, as now, done near home and often in the home. Travelling with a newborn was insanely dangerous, and even worse for the mother. Basic respect for the lives of the individuals, which is among the highest of all Jewish values, makes a trip to the Temple from any distance, absurd and very very wrong, the deepest sort of irresponsible sin. If anybody at all was circ'd in the Temple precincts, it would have been only the folks who lived there - and even then, likely performed in the living quarters. (3) Was Jesus a "card-carrier"? Nope, there's no such thing. There's no such thing as formal denominations. Sadducees and Pharisees were more like styles and bodies of opinion; they were not formal things that a person could "join" or "quit." Some individuals were strongly opinionated one way or another, but there was no "membership." Essenes were a little different, because they tended to live in isolated communities. And you're right, the largest group of Jews were "just Jews" - these "partisan" distinctions were entirely a matter of the educated elite. Even such modern distinctions as "Reform Judaism" or "Orthodox Judaism" have no formal meaning within Judaism; one can switch between then without "converting." One is born into Judaism or converts into Judaism, one is not born or converted into "Reformism" or "Orthodoxy." It's not like Catholics vs Protestants, or this-Protestant-denomination vs that one. Likewise one was never born or converted to "Pharisaism" or "Sadducism" - this makes no sense and has no meaning. One is a Jew, or one is not; and if not, one can hang out with Jews and pray with Jews provided only that one is not disrespectful. Further, although one born Gentile can convert to become a Jew, one faces no penalty in this life or the next if one doesn't.
Mr. Tabor you would have thought being so educated in the text you would have understood it's all referring to their bloodline Covenant... When you inspected the text it becomes very clear Paul is actually only targeting the children of Isaac.. And you know it's about the bloodline Covenant because he specifically States if you are not born from Sarah and Isaac you could not even have pardoned the promise..... These facts exclude religion completely, as well as Judaism which is not based on the bloodline Covenant but rather a wall added to the bloodline Covenant poor conditions in living in that land... Romans 9 7Neither, because they are the bloodline of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy bloodline be called. 8That is, They which are the children of the flesh,= Ishmael ) are not the children of God: but the children of the promise=( Isaac) are counted for the bloodline. 9For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. Genesis 17:21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year
You make it sound like it’s arbitrary. It’s far more likely a collection of people who literally worshipped a guy would have passed down his ideas and actions than that they wouldn’t have at all and someone decades later just made it all up. Some of it is invented but this guy has spent 40 years separating the wheat from the chaff so he probably has a better idea of what inthe gospels is history than you do.
But no true devoted person will ever claim.themselves jew( chosen) the reality would just become obvious from the glow of light coming from them! This is also confirmed by the traditions jews still blindly follow without knowing their true significance! Which christi-anity went on to copy claiming itself those that glow!
very interesting video. but i would disgree with the idea that the pharisees were a small elitist group. josephus says a few times that the multitude of the jews followed the pharisees josephus says: [288] However, this prosperous state of affairs moved the Jews to envy Hyrcanus; but they that were the worst disposed to him were the Pharisees, 1 who were one of the sects of the Jews, as we have informed you already. These have so great a power over the multitude, that when they say any thing against the king, or against the high priest, they are presently believed. (15) On account of these doctrines, they (Pharisees) are very influential among the body of the people, and whatever they do about divine worship, prayers, and sacrifices, they perform them according to their direction. In this way, the inhabitants of the cities gave great tribute to the Pharisees by conducting themselves virtuously, both in their way of life and their discourses as well.
No. Isaiah prophesied “There shall come a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a NAZARENE shall grow out of his roots. Matthew 2:23 “And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, HE SHALL BE CALLED A NAZARENE.” Jesus was a Nazarene… a Galilean. “And the multitude said, Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee. “ Matthew 21:11 The word “Jew” did not exist. The letter “J” was not invented until about 1524. When Jesus taught about the Rapture, He used the ancient Galilean wedding to foreshadow the biblical rapture. His disciples, other than Judas, were Galileans.
excellent professor! regarding his "davidic lineage thru his mother" -- the church could never solve the connundrum that the lineage to the messiah should be patrilineal, so they burned the jews who reminded the world of it.
The whole notion of Christianity is based on the need for a sacrificial savior..... No such idea is in the Torah. This begs the question, what sort of perverted god would need such a method for forgiveness of sin. = A pagan god. The God of the Hebrew Bible revealed to the Israelites and Prophets that His main objective in all His revelations was ethical behavior.
The Gospel of Jesus was originally one book, written by Lazarus in consultation with the Apostles [John 21:24] and published soon after Jesus left them on their own. The religion was hijacked by Rome, the Gospel was broken up scrambled adulterated into a bunch of competing narratives. Later four of those adulterated gospels were canonized with falsely ascribed authorship and a Gnosticism cover-story. It was the finding of an original Gospel of Jesus scroll in Jerusalem that gained the Knights Templar power over the Church and their eventual undoing when the church finally retaliated against them Friday 13th.
The Gospel of Jesus was originally one book, written by Lazarus in consultation with the Apostles [John 21:24] and published soon after Jesus left them on their own. The religion was hijacked by Rome, the Gospel was broken up scrambled adulterated into a bunch of competing narratives. Later four of those adulterated gospels were canonized with falsely ascribed authorship and a Gnosticism cover-story. It was the finding of an original Gospel of Jesus scroll in Jerusalem that gained the Knights Templar power over the Church and their eventual undoing when the church finally retaliated against them Friday 13th.
Jesus followed and spoke of The Way, but few listened, as the later beliefs that the likes of Saul were preferable to his philosophy of reason. The rest is a tragedy.
There are no apostles, there are no other fathers or teachers allowed, there is only God and those who come in the name of God, mot idols!! The jesus is an idol just like mithra for example. It's only for sinners to follow so they leave us alone
Loving the videos like this, Dr. Tabor - so focused and digestible, on topic, and fascinating. Wonderful job, as always.
He is so gullible. He thinks Jesus Christ is real. What a dupe. Doesn't know fiction when he reads it. Does he think Harry Potter is really too? What a skully
Jesus was announced as king of Israel in that choice between Jesus and Barabbas. Quickly said, Pilot dressed Jesus up as King, Pilot presented Jesus to the Sanhedrin and high priest among the crowd as "their King". Told the crowd to choose to crucify "their King" or Barabbas. The Saducees and High Priest chose "their king" Jesus to be crucified and instigated the Jewish crowd to choose "their King" to be crucified..... and so the Priesthood anointed Jesus as their king in order for him to be executed. And Pilat published this fact above Jesus head at a time when Jerusalem was most crowded of Jews from all over the realm.
What this accomplished was to legalize according to Torah law Jesus' amended covenant and make irrelevant all burdensome Talmudic rules.
I think Jesus and Pilat planned it together. Neet trick on the Sanhedrin huh.
Conversation between Mary and CP (Child Person)
CP: Who is your God?
Mary: Yahweh
CP: Who is the God of your child?
Mary: Yahweh is the God of Jesus
CP: Why?
Mary: There was only one holy book when Jesus was born, which is the Torah. And teaching God is Yahweh and nothing else.
CP: Then
Mary: I still teach him that God is Yahweh.
CP: Can he be God?
Mary: Previously, there was Pharaoh and Nimrud who claimed to be gods. I didn't make a mistake the second time
CP: Ok, next
Mary: Jesus was very weak as a child, dependent on others, I fed him. This is not the nature of God. I hope everyone understand
@@kebenaransejati2808 Jesus was announced as king of Israel in that choice between Jesus and Barabbas. Quickly said, Pilot dressed Jesus up as King, Pilot presented Jesus to the Sanhedrin and high priest among the crowd as "their King". Told the crowd to choose to crucify "their King" or Barabbas. The Saducees and High Priest chose "their king" Jesus to be crucified and instigated the Jewish crowd to choose "their King" to be crucified..... and so the Priesthood anointed Jesus as their king in order for him to be executed. And Pilat published this fact above Jesus head at a time when Jerusalem was most crowded of Jews from all over the realm.
What this accomplished was to legalize according to Torah law Jesus' amended covenant and make irrelevant all burdensome Talmudic rules.
I think Jesus and Pilat planned it together. Neet trick on the Sanhedrin huh.
I've waited all my life for this.
Most likely, the very last thing Jesus of Nazareth would have wanted to be remembered as would be: "God". "Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone." Doesn't sound like he's speaking of himself.
Why did the Jews want to kill Yeshua?? Why go above and beyond to have him crucified?
@@eklypised Every single one of Jesus’ followers were Jews. So what do you mean by “why did the Jews want to kill Jesus?” All Jews wanted Jesus dead? No. Only some specific people in positions of power probably viewed Jesus as a threat. The vast majority of Jews did not know who he was or care about what he was saying, which is why his followers were few in numbers and poor.
Why does anyone want to kill anyone else? What lead to Christian’s killing Christian’s? There’s myriad reasons to such a question.
The best theory I’ve heard as to why the temple authorities handed him to the romans (who did the actual killing) was because they were afraid that if he caused a rebellion the entire Jewish race would be punished as a result. Hard to say they were wrong, if they did indeed think that, given what later happened during the great Jewish revolt and the bar kokbah revolt. These two revolts and their consequences changed the face of Judaism forever and were the beginning of a long history of tragedies in the hands of European kingdoms and empires.
@@eklypised Your questions are good ones and I think a good place to begin answering them is found in this video, beginning with time-marker 3:04ff.
“…for many Jews it was impossible to separate the social and political realities of military occupation and economic oppression from Jewish piety and Faith. The Jewish belief that the people of Israel have been chosen by God to become a model nation that would exemplify Justice and Righteousness to the entire world was fundamental. The Hebrew prophets had predicted that in the last days all nations would go up to Jerusalem to learn about the one true, creator God, irresistibly drawn by Israel's moral example of peace and justice. Not all Jews accepted such an idealistic vision but enough did that John the Baptizer, Jesus and his brother James were able to spark a movement that threatened the highest levels of the political and religious establishment. (To me, this last sentence is the key: John, Jesus, James and their movement threatened the highest levels of political and religious power.)
@@eklypised for the same reason you want him to be killed (than to say it was sacrificed) rather save him. I find it amazing you ask a question why Jew wanted to kill him, so you know it was an incident of killing a person. Not a incident of willing sacrifice by any parties. Not by killer and not by the person who was killed. Can you sacrifice anything without the intention of doing a sacrifice? No parties know. If a person claim to be god we say He is mad 😡, we don't kill him. Last thing an empire would do to kill a person who claimed to be god. He was killed cuz his voice was against oppression. If You don’t understand what he was fighting for? Than you know nothing about his life.
@@eklypised was not it the romans and the romanisers who had him killed?
Paul is responsible for disconnecting from Judaism and the Roman emperor Constantine took Christianity to another new level which was never intended by Jesus.
Too much credit is given to Constantine for shaping the Bible formation and formation of Christianity. The formation of Christianity. Was a long process. Jesus should have been enough just as he was. Paul turned things upside down, thus making western Christianity “Pauline” Christianity. I am inspired by the stories of Jesus, but I do not care for Paul and his teachings.
- The Gospel of Jesus was originally one book, written by Lazarus in consultation with the Apostles [John 21:24] and published soon after Jesus left them on their own. The religion was hijacked by Rome, the Gospel was broken up scrambled adulterated into a bunch of competing narratives. Later four of those adulterated gospels were canonized with falsely ascribed authorship and a Gnosticism cover-story. It was the finding of an original Gospel of Jesus scroll in Jerusalem that gained the Knights Templar power over the Church and their eventual undoing when the church finally retaliated against them Friday 13th.
And who cares? Some people act like a first century Jew would have such an amazing wisdom that surpasses generations.
It doesn't, just a human and he was also wrong is so many ways.
We must not forget of Paul's encounter with Jesus Christ. Paul was not teaching a different Christianity. He was implicitly being led by God The Holy Spirit who was sent by God, The Son, namely Jesus Christ.
@@1773JC Paul lied about his encounter with the sprit. The Apostles did not believe Paul's conversion story.
@10:10 circumcised at the Jewish temple in Jerusalem? There was never any association or requirement for circumcision to be performed at the temple. Not sure where Tabor got this from
I so enjoyed this video, James. Thank you so much.
Dr. Tabor's book "The Jesus Dynasty" is a must read for those searching for the historical versus the theological Jesus. Warning, if your faith is tied to the Jesus myth constructed by European Christianity then you may wish to pass on this book but if you are in search of historical and archaeological evidence interpreted and presented in a scholarly but readable fashion about Jesus prophet and jew then this book will be both fascinating and illuminating.
No ! what i found lol not a Jew as in Babylonian Jews
King of the Druids
King Arthur
Carleon-Upon-Usk in Gwent, Wales
This is where Arthur was crowned and held his first court, presiding over a rich company including liveried knights and their ladies. The present site contains the ruins of a fine Roman amphitheatre and extensive buildings.
a round temple table lol
Link to king of Greece
Theseus
Aegeus
Aigeús, also spelled Aegeas)
Rock of destiny
Stone of scone
Christ rock
Galatia or Galilee
The Galatians were a Celtic people dwelling in Galatia, a region of central Anatolia surrounding present-day Ankara, during the Hellenistic period.
@@allmightlionthunder5515 The Celtic people from Britain and Ireland are from the 10 Jewish Tribes. The lady at the well, knew Jesus was a Jew. Above Jesus on the Crucifix, it stated... King of The Jews. There are many other scriptures that document that. Nazarenes were Christian Jews. Many Jews, have realized that Jesus is Their Jewish Messiah. The Jewish Bloodline runs through The British Kings and Queens ⚜️🐝✡️🦁
@@allmightlionthunder5515 Fellow Celt here. Are you smoking something?
@@grit1679 Saying your a fellow Celt that doesn't know history lol
Then you do not get it do you so tell me you do not know Celtic , Briton and roman and Greek history .
Galatia or Galilee
The Galatians were a Celtic people dwelling in Galatia, a region of central Anatolia surrounding present-day Ankara, during the Hellenistic period.
You understand Jesus very well.
Thank You James Tabor, The wise Saint.
That's the first time I've heard of Dr. Tabor being called a saint, but if saints exist in these modern times, Dr. Tabor should certainly be considered for canonization! I have an excellent BS detector and nothing he says seems to budge my meter! I'm very thankful for his scholarly prowess!
@@bradleyforrester5757 yes, this man needs a standing ovation
My own BS meter says otherwise. . . . . @@bradleyforrester5757
Thank you Dr. Tabor
Mathew 23 :13-31. Leonardo da Vinci said " The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions " Plato shared with us wisdom he learnt from Egypt, wisdom that was a death sentence in Greece, Rome ( Christianity) .. Pythagoras, Socrates and later Hypatia of Alexandria. Plato in his dialogue " The Republic " tells the allegory of " The Cave " Plato starts by telling us of prisoners being held in a sort of underground den, let us examine this den via the geometry of Bernhard Riemann and Felix Klein.. Klein bottle..3rd and 4th dimensions. Plato tells us that the prisoners are bound up unable to move their heads, let us examine this bondage via the psychology of Erich Fromm.. socialisation of consciousness..aware-unaware. Plato tells us that the prisoners mistake shadows for substance, let us examine this mistake via the philosophy of Thales and Kant..synthetic a priori..not thing in itself. Plato tells us that one of the prisoners is released, let us examine this release via the instructions given by T.Lobsang Rampa..stilling the mind- seek first the Kingdom of God..conscious astral travel- leaving the cave/body. John 8: 32. Plato tells us that the prisoners will reject this release, let us examine this rejection via the psychological effects of Stockholm syndrome..Mathew 7: 21-23.. Plato quotes Homer " Better to be a poor man, and have a poor master, and endure anything, than to think and live after their manner " Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds. Mathew 7: 1-12.
wow, brilliantly written. like an improved apostilles' creed.
A friend and I are devouring your videos.
I always wondered what Christianity would look like if you just used the synoptic gospels.
Did Jesus read the bible in Hebrew or Aramaic?
0:45 I always think that Galilean skull reconstruction looks like Fred Flintstone.
Jesus actually looked like Alfred E Neuman
@@beachboys3326 Of Course. Jesus and I are related..
@@termination9353
No, you're not
You and Charlie Manson are related.
The religion of Jesus is the same religion of Abraham.
Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian.
Abraham was someone who submitted to the will of his Creator which is definition of a muslim.
The patriarchs and Moses were dealing with a god (son of god), Elohim or Anunnaki (cf. Deut. 32:8-9). The Most High conferred Jacob or Israel upon Yahweh as his inheritance among the 70 nations.
The earlier idols (false deities) were statues erected of pious people of previous generations.
These people were later wrongly prayed to and taken as deities.
These type of misguided beliefs of taking humans as deities or gods exist in pagan and polytheist religions, past and present.
A human taking another human as a deity or God is falsehood.
It makes absolutely no sense for a human to pray to (worship) another human.
Deity Incarnation where a human is believed to be a deity or God coming down in this world as a human is among the misguided claims in pagan and polytheist religions, past and present.
Claiming a human is God manifest as a human is among the misguided claims in pagan and polytheist religions.
Claiming a spirit in a human is a deity or God is among the misguided claims in pagan and polytheist religions.
Claiming God having sons or daughters is among the misguides claims in pagan and polytheists religions.
All that I mentioned about idolatry, pagan and polytheist religions you can look it up online including from their own sources.
The misguided belief of taking Jesus as a deity or God is against what Jesus himself believe and taught. It is against what all the guided prophets that include Noah, Abraham and Moses believed and taught. It is against the foremost of the religion which is the first and foremost commandment.
Abraham did not pray to Jesus which is a man's name.
Abraham did not pray to three persons.
God is not a human
God created humans
As great a human Jesus is,
he still is human.
Was Jesus a good carpenter though? Did he work on day rates or 'piece work'?
i have long been wondering why the earliest so called followers of jesus/yEhoshua/yeshua are
not called yeshuans/yehoshuans?!
To understand the relevance of Jesus let's just study Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy. Without ignoring passages, altering punctuation, rearranging scripture, relying on obscure extra-biblical apostates, or imaginary calendar keeping, a plain reading of Dan 9:25, 26 shows that from Artaxerxes I decree to Ezra to take all the volunteers he wanted and return with them to Judah and Jerusalem, and further giving Ezra authority over the region and substantial funds, wasn't just a fact finding trip - it was to restore Jerusalem. From which event, simple addition of 69 weeks of years yields the baptism ("anointing") of Jesus Christ in A.D. 26, all consistent with history and His age, length of ministry and crucifixion ("cutting off") in A.D. 30, the only year in which the gospel accounts of Passion Week can be harmonized and reconciled with calendars. Daniel 9:25, 26 is in fact fulfilled Messianic prophecy is clearly fulfilled in Jesus. You will now say it's coincidence. Just like it's coincidence he was born in Bethlehem. Was pierced, smitten, entered Jerusalem on a donkey, bones not broken etc. All that coincidence? Even the great prophecy in Daniel? Really?
Ethnicity, culture, "nationality" back then and today matter. The young and foolish today do not understand this. They are naive.
This is an excellent summary
Ya know, I respect Dr Tabor's expertise, but wonder how much stock he'd put on "Jesus came from the line of David," as actual History? I understand if that's the way Jesus (or the interpreter of His life) felt, but it really seems a LONG way from the actual time of King David to be verifiable in ANY way...that's My take.
Thought I would pitch in here.
Firstly, David might or might not have existed as a real king or human being. Perhaps he is just a legend. If he did exist, I doubt the veracity or reliability of any stories written *down about him (effectively 400-500 years later in Babylon).
But let’s assume he was king of a minor state in and around Jerusalem. It is written that he hat several children, as did his supposed son Solomon.
In the intervening 800-900 years, given the way generics work in small populations, the odds are that Jesus would have been able to claim some sort of lineage back to David, probably via both parents. But then so would most of the population in that area.
So it’s not that relevant, unless one is wanting to retro-engineer a ‘prophesy’ and use it as proof about a specific messianic claim.
Even finding evidence of biblical figures or habitations in no way validates the religious claims in scripture. After all, we have *proof that Egyptian pharaohs existed. Their literature claims they are also gods. All of the Ceasers existed. They were worshiped as gods too. As were figures across cultures and time. Do we accept those claims as being divine truth? Outside a few devotees, I’d say no. So why believe the god of the Bible is any more real?
Sorry, that became a bit of a rant.
Perhaps it is referring to the corrupted genome of humans, and our Creators purpose and progression to bring about a human Elohim Prince to by perfecting human ability to rule/ judge the other Elohim that abused their separate powers ….Logos, the interface between the Elohim family, was perfected by becoming human and totally reliant on His Creator/Father for his existence…
It would be interesting if you could do a video on Samaritan beliefs, and the beliefs in general of 1st temple Yahwehism when all the tribes helped build the temple. Too bad the Jews from babylon didn't let the Samaritans help build the 2nd temple. I think Samaritans show how belief in Yahweh was never limited to the tribe if Judea and is universal
The Temple of Jesus' time was not the second temple. Jesus' time was Herod's temple the THIRD temple. The Jewish Sect of the Nazarine wanted that temple's services ended which meant wanting that temple destroyed.
My likely he and most of the Jews read Greek scripture
@@termination9353 Which were the first two?
@@brisadelcastillo2840 Original built during Solomon's reign. 2nd after return from exile in Babylon, Then Herod completely reengineered the whole of the Temple Mount, sweeping away the 2nd Temple and building a bigger grander temple in Herod's own honor.
@@termination9353 I did not know that, thanks.
Thank you again. A good reference piece.
Jesus did not 'move beyond it' - as if to abandon it - that would be error. He was trying to show that the Lord does ALL THINGS (Isaiah 45: 7), and that all were as such 'bound by their actions' to the law, and elevated the requirements of it to a spiritual level, whereby the fruits of a persons actions (what comes out of a man) defiled him.
The law cannot be enforced by the letter, as you would have to break it in order to fulfill it.
This is what Jesus wrote in the sand...
Exodus 21:12 or (but less likely) Leviticus 24:17
The 'scales' that fell from Saul's eyes, were the scales of rights to judge. Evil has a purpose - it's the most enjoyable way to learn what NOT to do.
I have THE 'theodicy' sir... and I welcome you to discuss it with me. The world 'needs' it. And it is time.
Musante... mus 'A' nte
Musa (Moses)
Etna (Mountain of Fire)
Anytime will do.
Shalom.
I have seen Jesus and the image used here (from 0:41 on) resembles him most.
He taught and read in the Temple as well.
Who, Arrius Piso?
Finally the truth about Jesus & Judaism. He followed the Old Testament. Christianity ignored his Jewishishness & altered his beliefs from Israel & changed it according to a new scripture he knew nothing of.
Jesus rejected certain "rabbinic" interpretations? the rabbinic tradition was a response to the Roman's destruction of the Temple, a generation after Jesus' Crucifixion, so there were no "rabbinic" interpretations for Jesus to reject or accept.
16:23 those demographic numbers are illuminating, thanks
It's interesting that neither Josephus nor the Essenes wrote what Jesus looked like.
Because Josephus is the pen name of Arrius Calpurnius Piso
We’ve got the Shroud and we know exactly what Jesus looked like. Also we have the Divine Mercy image which Jesus Himself told Sr Faustina to have painted. All facial dimensions match the Shroud.
@@billyhomeyer7414 the shroud is a forgery. Jesus is fiction, obviously
@@arriuscalpurniuspiso we call this blasphemy and I shall pray for your soul. For those who believe, no proof is necessary, for those who don’t believe, no proof is possible.
@@billyhomeyer7414 our current scholarship proves who wrote the NT. It was the Piso Family. And the NT is nothing more than imperial Roman propaganda designed to kill the Jews
I think he spent more time in Sepphoris growing up than most people think.
Once thing possible, somewhere between Egypt and Saudi Arabia, between the Mediterranean and Red Seas, an analytically viable source of his dna is currently resting.
Rest in Peace whoever you were.
Unbelievable though it might seem, there is an alternate view. "Jesus the Phoenician" by Karim El Koussa. What did Jesus mean when he said, "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." What did he mean when he said to the Jews, "Whither I go, ye cannot come." Or John 8:44? The history of Jesus is like the history of the Israelites ... complex.
You're saying, "Jesus can not have been the 'Jesus of the Bible'." where Paul and his letters painted Jesus as a Gentile-friendly Bringer of Peace rather than a terrorist of the Jewish Revolt Era. Right?
Even it is debated that he was a jew. First, his belive and teaching was universal and not connected to one nation.
Second, in Galilea mostly not jews were living at that time. Even the word Galilea means: land of goys, means land of not jews.
He went on to covert them to the Jewish faith. Also these ppl were Hebrews also. U can be a Goyim Hebrew
Why do religious people/scholars and the like still continue to refer to Jesus/Iēsos by this name when we now know his Hebrew name is Yeshua??? He should be called by the name he used in his time period and the name everyone called him by should he not????
And Muhammad was a traveling salesman, that married a rich princess..
Can you imagine how the world would look like today if the Romans had not invaded Judea (labeled Israel today). The name Palestine is derived from the name Palaestina a name given to Judea by the Romans to avoid the return of the Jewish kingdom.
... which was shortly after the Bar Kochba revolt. The word "Filistina" *did* exist to refer to a people who were neighbors to the Egyptians, but scholars now believe those references may refer to the people known as the Philistines in the Bible.
@@RLocksley The Philistines are Greeks who colonized the area known as Gaza today.
But didn’t the keys of the church get handed to Peter, the first pope?
Exactly, Moses and the other Prophet's books were supposedly preserved by miraculous intervention, to ensure the truth remains even after the corruption of humanity. Yet there is no Jesus Book??? The new testament claims it is, but in reality it is a gathered selection of others writting, not the word for word writtings of Jesus at all!
The silly portrayal of Jesus starting at 0:50 is based on Joan Taylor's book, "What Did Jesus Look Like." Taylor constructed her ridiculous image of Jesus by tritely dismissing the Shroud of Turin as authentic. She bought into Dr. McCrone's "painting" theory and then opined that the images on the Shroud were the result of a medieval penitential rite. Her book is full of errors and makes no sense. Dr. Tabor is also a Shroud denier, and perhaps that is why he has posted Taylor's supposed image of Jesus throughout this video.
the shroud is from the 15th century
Of course it is. But art history also places it in the sixth century, so include the 14th, 13th, 12th, 11th, 10th, 9th, 8th, and 7th centuries in your evaluation. @@chibibeetle
The God of the Jews said: Isaiah 46:9-10 "Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me. Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure." And He will not change His mind: Numbers 23:19 God is not human, that He should lie, not a human being that He should change His mind. Does He speak and then not act? Does He promise and not fulfill? Where are the followers of the **renowned and powerful people at their time**? The Nazis, Stalinists, even followers of Elvis Presley? Why is the Man so hated by most of His people, the Jews,. and His early followers were hiding because of persecution, and were fed by the Romans to lions for entertainment (which should have effectively stop their growth, the spread of Christianity, followers of Jesus CHRIST), why is He still famous today and His followers are now in billions? Because God fulfilled His promise?, that **through** the offspring of Isaac, and Jacob/Israel, A JEW, will ALL NATIONS on earth be blessed, Genesis 26:4, 28:14. The God of the Jews never commanded the Jews to proselyte. But we came to know their God (the Bible contains the old testament, the Torah of the Jews) through THE JEW, Jesus Christ who commanded His followers to proclaim the gospel to the world.
I absolutely love speculating what kinda Jew Jesus was tend to side with Robert Eisenman's view which was he seemed to be on the more militant side, so I'm guessing Zealot. He hasn't convinced me the Qumran material is Jameseon, but that he and his brother are alot more strict Jews than Paul and the only thing that survived after the Pax Romana was what was allowed by Rome. That's my take and thank you Dr Tabor for keeping the debate going!
Yeshua was a Torah-observant, Torah-teaching Rabbi who taught the true meaning of the Torah which has LOVE as it's Modus Operandi; Love for the Father (vertical- cross-beam) and Love for one's neighbor (horizontal- stake). His AUTHORized teaching of the Torah was "easy and (His) yoke is light" which set it apart in ways from the many additions and subtractions in the Pharisee's Oral Torah.
@@michaelsmith9453 This is mindless. vacuous and uninformed witnessing which contains no information and has no value. You don't know anything about Jesus OR the Torah. You're just making stuff up. Roman crosses had no standardized design, by the way. Usually the cross-beam went across the top like a capital T. Sometimes there was no crossbar. In no case was there ever any love involved or implied.
@@Ken_Scaletta Lol! Why are you so uptight Ken? By just alluding to the execution stake, cross or whatever you want to describe it as causes you to foment at the mouth? You need some stability in your life. 🙏🙏🙏
This is a channel about genuine scholarship. It's not a train platform. If you're going to proselytize at least know what you're talking about. You show no respect for the scholar or for scholarship when you barge in just to shout slogans. If you're going to preach, at least make a reasoned, cited academic argument for it. If you're going to say a cross stands for love, back that up with something. Do some research on acrostics in Jewish or Greek literature. You might be able to manufacture a pseudo-academic argument. I've seen worse.
"Torah is love." Do you write Hallmark cards? Torah says to kill people if they pick up sticks on a Saturday.
Jesus was sent to the Qumran monastery after the age of 12 to become an Essene scribe. It was from Qumran that Jesus traveled to be baptized by John.
He was of the Nazarite sect like John the Baptist & in earlier times, Sampson.
Jesus was sent to the Qumran monastery after 12 years old to become an Essene scribe. It was Qumran that Jesus traveled from to be baptized by John.
@@bluegreen6153 How so?
@Yah Weh One reason is Jesus' teaching on prayer "enter your closet, pray in secret..."
Jesus or Yehusua???
Thank you for this video
Who ever Jesus was has been totally corrupted by the church and the writing of Paul.
Can we truly believe any gospel when we know they were written way after the life of Jesus anonymously.
I wonder could Jesus have been literate as he dame from a poor family.
The notion he was God is really not in the bible if he did believe that he would have been killed along time before he was by his peers, not by Pontius Pilate.
yes, a Day Job in Sepphorus as a stone-mason makes a lot of sense for Jesus' years before 30 y.o.
"political/religious establishment" - ??? trying to bifurcate the matter? It's simply retelling how to observe who is blessed from who has cursed themselves - according to the TEACHING of Elohim.
So if Jesus can trace his lineage back to Adam, was Adam a Jew.? Who was the first Jew.?
No
Adem was muslim
MUSLIM MEANS SUMBBITING WILL TO THE ONE GOD
ALL THE PROPHETS WERE MUSLIMS FROM ADEM TO MOHAMMED
@@나드난 But Adam went against God and ate from the tree he was told not to eat from.
@@jamesmason8944 O Adam, inhabit the Garden, you and your wife, and eat from wherever you wish, and do not approach this tree, lest you be among the wrongdoers. So Satan whispered to them about me. What was hidden from them of their evils was revealed to them, and He said, “Your Lord has not forbidden you from this tree unless you become angels or become among the immortal.” *And he swore to them, “Indeed, I am to you who are sincere.” So he treated them with deceit, and when they tasted the tree, their evil deeds became apparent to them, and they began to cover themselves with the leaves of Paradise. Their Lord called to them, “Did I not forbid you from that tree and tell you that Satan is your clear enemy?” They said, “Our Lord, we have wronged ourselves, and if you do not forgive us.” And have mercy on us, we will surely be among the losers.* He said, “Go down.” Some of you are enemies to others, and for you in the land is a place of rest and enjoyment for a while.
@@나드난 Adam was not a Muslim since Islam, did not exist in that time your arguing semantics.
The Holy Scriptures don't teach one milligram of Christianity.matt.5:17-19/Isa 8:20
Thank you, James. You have done much work. 🙏
Would you be open to other explanations (explanations that only a relative few on earth know about-perhaps an explanation by the ascended consciousness of Jesus)?
When reading, you will learn how such communication was accomplished, which scientists can now explain.
Please search for CHRIST’S LETTERS from CHRIST’S WAY online (including in various social media platforms). The pieces will surely fall into place.
Blessings!
If Jesus existed, I honestly think he would be horrified by what Paul and the Church Father's had done to his movement.
Exactly !my god guide you to islam
You seem to be smart !
@@나드난Jesus is the way to the Father. He’s the son of the true living God. There’s no religion but a relationship with the Messiah
After decades of trying to convert mainly Protestants from "Christianity" to the true teachings and practices of Jesus, I also have come to the foundational realization that Jesus was not a "Christian" but a Jew. and too many Christian doctrines, such as "Original Sin" and an eternal hell, for example, were not exactly what Jesus would have advocated as a Jew. Of course, this needs fleshing out and more research.
Jesus was never a flesh person.
That which is born of the flesh is flesh that which is born of Spirit is spirit
Now the birth of Jesus was in this wise, When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.
Which means Virgins don't have babies... The child of promise us born in you, which you must crucify(the flesh desires) so it is no longer you that lives but Christ in you.
Be less Christian and be more Christ
Seems like so few “Christians” actually understand who Jesus was at all. Thus the religious legalists and literalists and tradition bound claim righteousness to this day while becoming everything Jesus defied and despised. It’s that simple really. Legalists never change.
Modern day Christian churches ignore the fact Jesus was a Jew, born, lived and died a Jew. If we want to be like Jesus we need to give it bit of thought.
YAhusha is the Son, Yahuah is the Father 👏👋
Isaac only
when you look at what Paul is saying in his letters, it states clearly only the children of Isaac can receive the promise,..
This is why the scribes and Pharisees were persecuting them, you see the scribes and Pharisees were actually the children of Ishmael... and Paul was basically saying they were not included..
Genesis 16:12And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
Galatians 4:28¶Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
29But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
30Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
Also note..
Paul in the passages below states, just because people are the children of Abraham doesn't make them heirs to the promises,
Paul goes on to say that only the children of Isaac could receive the promises which the letters a referencing...
Let me also add, Paul would not write letters to people at Rome about the Affairs of a bloodline covenant,
if these Gentiles at Rome were not the" bloodline of Isaac"
.......(The northern house).......
Let's review.
Romans 9 7Neither, because they are the bloodline of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy bloodline be called.
8That is, They which are the children of the flesh,= Ishmael ) are not the children of God: but the children of the promise=( Isaac) are counted for the bloodline.
9For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son.
Note,
Paul in Romans 9:9 refers you to Genesis 17:21 confirming it's their bloodline Covenant which is indeed being referenced..
Genesis 17:21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.
Now this doesn't mean you can't have salvation, but it does mean you can't have part in the promises it's referencing from the letters..
Such as being part of the body of Christ, the Eternal priesthood for example...
But you can be a fellow citizen in a finished Kingdom with a finished eternal Temple which now makes intercession from the clouds of Heaven as we speak..
As the children of Isaac , the corporate body of Christ has inherited all things and now control the New Covenant as the Saints of Heaven....
Romans 4 13¶For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith.
Isaiah 49 8¶Thus saith the LORD, In an acceptable time have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I helped thee: and I will preserve thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages..
Isaiah 54:3For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles, and make the desolate cities to be inhabited.
the only thing about the type of jew he was is debatable(depending on if the ad biblical texts are true that is) jesus would be more a rabbinical type figure practicing/preaching the school of Hillel.. example,, abolishing ALL commandments set before & then only following/preaching only the ten commandments or Noah’s/Adams
Following Jewish law Jesus fulfilled the law and opened the door of his grace and law of holy spirit
Jesus did many miracles on Sabbat and explained to the leader the true spirit of Sabbath
God Bless you
I don't think it is right to call Jesus as a jew
God is not a Jew or a Christian. God the creator has to be beyond all sectarianism.
You open by saying Jesus “read” the scriptures in Hebrew. Isn’t it most likely that Jesus was illiterate, as were most of the population. Didn’t he speak Aramaic? I believe that you, yourself, have said that only the upper class and elites were literate, that there was no school in Nazareth.
So since I'm heaven champion. An I defeated the devil an his crew.
I wield Jesus healing power. All old aches and pains will be washed away.
The whole problem with all this smoke and mirrors is that Jesus wasn't a Jew!
Jesus didn't exist, but if he did he wasn't a "Jew", they didn't exist then?
There is a difference between a Jew “JU” of the tribes of Judah, or the Hebrew, which Jesus was, is not taught by many….
This is nonsense.
This is shattering. I thought Jesus was a Roman Catholic. Of course geza vermes said all this in his ground breaking book of 1971." Jesus there Jew". So nothing new here. But well done to james for making scholarship available
One of the problems with this narrative is that it was not Palestine at the time of Jesus. Also, Jesus said that He and the Father are one. If you had seen Him, you would have seen the Father. Sounds like He claimed to be God to me. Plus all the Apostles claimed that he was God, and died to prove it.
As near the truth s we are ever likely to get, raw history will always trump superstitious mythology and blind faith.
A bit of subject, but: "Roman occupied Plaestine?", I think you mean "Roman occupied Judea."
Jesus read the 24 books of the Tanakh (OT39) but ALSO the 70 hidden Hebrew books. He was vehemently opposed to Pharisees and their traditions of the elders
Not really to your last sentence. Jesus references the oral Torah, several times throughout the gospels. He was against how the Levitical priests, put the Talmudic tradition above the scriptures.
When a person is spiritually worthy, only then are they blessed. A person is never blessed or shines, just because they call themselves so, that is a contradiction!
Why christi-anity is it's own anti-christ! An arrogant movement that destroys people's opportunity to come closer to the True God, it instead created a fake God it calls the jesus trinity!
Didn't Jesus say his father was not the God of the hebro faith? He though of Yahweh as the material demiurge?
WHY IS HE ALWAYS PORTRAIT HAS A MAN WITH A BEARD AND NAILED TO A CROSS 25 DEC AS HIS BIRTHDAY, THE CUSTOMS IN ROMAN TIMES WAS HAIR CUT SHORT AND WHY DID THE GUARD ASK TO POINT HIM OUT!!!!!!!!!
Herod or Borgia icons are funny and the (renaissance) art
A couple of tiny misapprehensions...
(1) Most families could not remotely afford to make all of the pilgrimages to Jerusalem every year; you lose too many workdays just coming and going and leave the home village unoccupied and unprotected - depending on how far away they were and their specific means, they made as many pilgrimages to Jerusalem as possible. To do otherwise is to create the conditions for starvation. The farmers needed to tend their crops and animals, it's as simple as that. Perhaps you could get a neighbor to tend yours for a week, probably in return for tending theirs. Otherwise, in subsistence agriculture, somebody is going to starve to death. See the importance of human life, below.
Now as a single, healthy, male with no family responsibilities and a trade (not a farmer) it would have been easier for Jesus to make the pilgrimage than it was for most; but the same would be true of any other single, healthy male who was not a farmer. It's not remarkable in any way.
(2) There is no reason to suppose that Jesus (or most anybody els) was circumcised at the Temple. It was then, as now, done near home and often in the home. Travelling with a newborn was insanely dangerous, and even worse for the mother. Basic respect for the lives of the individuals, which is among the highest of all Jewish values, makes a trip to the Temple from any distance, absurd and very very wrong, the deepest sort of irresponsible sin. If anybody at all was circ'd in the Temple precincts, it would have been only the folks who lived there - and even then, likely performed in the living quarters.
(3) Was Jesus a "card-carrier"? Nope, there's no such thing. There's no such thing as formal denominations. Sadducees and Pharisees were more like styles and bodies of opinion; they were not formal things that a person could "join" or "quit." Some individuals were strongly opinionated one way or another, but there was no "membership." Essenes were a little different, because they tended to live in isolated communities. And you're right, the largest group of Jews were "just Jews" - these "partisan" distinctions were entirely a matter of the educated elite. Even such modern distinctions as "Reform Judaism" or "Orthodox Judaism" have no formal meaning within Judaism; one can switch between then without "converting." One is born into Judaism or converts into Judaism, one is not born or converted into "Reformism" or "Orthodoxy." It's not like Catholics vs Protestants, or this-Protestant-denomination vs that one. Likewise one was never born or converted to "Pharisaism" or "Sadducism" - this makes no sense and has no meaning. One is a Jew, or one is not; and if not, one can hang out with Jews and pray with Jews provided only that one is not disrespectful. Further, although one born Gentile can convert to become a Jew, one faces no penalty in this life or the next if one doesn't.
Mr. Tabor you would have thought being so educated in the text you would have understood it's all referring to their bloodline Covenant...
When you inspected the text it becomes very clear Paul is actually only targeting the children of Isaac..
And you know it's about the bloodline Covenant because he specifically States if you are not born from Sarah and Isaac you could not even have pardoned the promise.....
These facts exclude religion completely, as well as Judaism which is not based on the bloodline Covenant but rather a wall added to the bloodline Covenant poor conditions in living in that land...
Romans 9 7Neither, because they are the bloodline of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy bloodline be called.
8That is, They which are the children of the flesh,= Ishmael ) are not the children of God: but the children of the promise=( Isaac) are counted for the bloodline.
9For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son.
Genesis 17:21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year
Amen 🙏💖 Jesus was God in human form dear God bless and forgive all sinner's who question you
Why do you even bother listening to this?
Extremely interesting.
this presupposes that the gospels reliably record Jesus' words and actions.
Why would you think otherwise?
@@nomadicrecovery1586 It's good to think amd reflect on the reliability and meaning of religious scripture, otherwise it is blind faith.
You make it sound like it’s arbitrary. It’s far more likely a collection of people who literally worshipped a guy would have passed down his ideas and actions than that they wouldn’t have at all and someone decades later just made it all up. Some of it is invented but this guy has spent 40 years separating the wheat from the chaff so he probably has a better idea of what inthe gospels is history than you do.
Yes. Absolutely. And the New Testament records numerous times He violated the Sabbath.
He took the believer from the Temple and brought the temple to the believer
But no true devoted person will ever claim.themselves jew( chosen) the reality would just become obvious from the glow of light coming from them!
This is also confirmed by the traditions jews still blindly follow without knowing their true significance!
Which christi-anity went on to copy claiming itself those that glow!
Jesus was a white suburban evangelical republican christian lol 😂
Oh dear, they'll be coming for you Dr Tabor. 😂
Thank you James
very interesting video. but i would disgree with the idea that the pharisees were a small elitist group. josephus says a few times that the multitude of the jews followed the pharisees
josephus says:
[288] However, this prosperous state of affairs moved the Jews to envy Hyrcanus; but they that were the worst disposed to him were the Pharisees, 1 who were one of the sects of the Jews, as we have informed you already. These have so great a power over the multitude, that when they say any thing against the king, or against the high priest, they are presently believed.
(15) On account of these doctrines, they (Pharisees) are very influential among the body of the people, and whatever they do about divine worship, prayers, and sacrifices, they perform them according to their direction. In this way, the inhabitants of the cities gave great tribute to the Pharisees by conducting themselves virtuously, both in their way of life and their discourses as well.
No. Isaiah prophesied “There shall come a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a NAZARENE shall grow out of his roots.
Matthew 2:23 “And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, HE SHALL BE CALLED A NAZARENE.”
Jesus was a Nazarene… a Galilean. “And the multitude said, Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee. “
Matthew 21:11
The word “Jew” did not exist. The letter “J” was not invented until about 1524.
When Jesus taught about the Rapture, He used the ancient Galilean wedding to foreshadow the biblical rapture. His disciples, other than Judas, were Galileans.
excellent professor!
regarding his "davidic lineage thru his mother" -- the church could never solve the connundrum that the lineage to the messiah should be patrilineal, so they burned the jews who reminded the world of it.
The whole notion of Christianity is based on the need for a sacrificial savior..... No such idea is in the Torah.
This begs the question, what sort of perverted god would need such a method for forgiveness of sin. = A pagan god.
The God of the Hebrew Bible revealed to the Israelites and Prophets that His main objective in all His revelations was ethical behavior.
So unethical to covet oxen. Slavery is ethical I guess then lol whut
My neighbour has a sweet ass donkey too lmfao
First two lines, perfect. Then u veeeerd off a cliff son lol
I know Moses broke a tablet with 5 commandments on but aint nothing but the obvious in the 10 left, half of them relating to a jealous god.
The Gospel of Jesus was originally one book, written by Lazarus in consultation with the Apostles [John 21:24] and published soon after Jesus left them on their own. The religion was hijacked by Rome, the Gospel was broken up scrambled adulterated into a bunch of competing narratives. Later four of those adulterated gospels were canonized with falsely ascribed authorship and a Gnosticism cover-story. It was the finding of an original Gospel of Jesus scroll in Jerusalem that gained the Knights Templar power over the Church and their eventual undoing when the church finally retaliated against them Friday 13th.
Neither a Jew nor non-Jew can be God.
@Graveyard skull I’m saying no human can be God. Worshipping any man as God is idolatry.
The Gospel of Jesus was originally one book, written by Lazarus in consultation with the Apostles [John 21:24] and published soon after Jesus left them on their own. The religion was hijacked by Rome, the Gospel was broken up scrambled adulterated into a bunch of competing narratives. Later four of those adulterated gospels were canonized with falsely ascribed authorship and a Gnosticism cover-story. It was the finding of an original Gospel of Jesus scroll in Jerusalem that gained the Knights Templar power over the Church and their eventual undoing when the church finally retaliated against them Friday 13th.
Tell me more, details please. I need to follow this up.
What are you on about lol
And exactly what was that gospel the templar had?
@@beecee3161 A Gospel that contained the testimony you find in all four gospels combined.
@@polarisnorth4875 What are YOU on about..
Jesus followed and spoke of The Way, but few listened, as the later beliefs that the likes of Saul were preferable to his philosophy of reason. The rest is a tragedy.
There are no apostles, there are no other fathers or teachers allowed, there is only God and those who come in the name of God, mot idols!! The jesus is an idol just like mithra for example. It's only for sinners to follow so they leave us alone
Yahweh, actuslly means Yah Ho wah He Who Is, Our Creator Whose name is Holy and to whom mortal man has no access to know!
christianity is "judaism light" mixed in w greco-roman paganism, later turned against its creators who reminded them idolatry was bad.
Yahusha I'm sure was more in favor of the Hebrewishim as a jew not that of the pharisees jews an there exal babalon tumud
Its’s straight from the Jesus Dynasty book.