From her comments, I take it that a 3T MRI is superior to a 1.5 MRI, adding that steep gradients are also important. Our urologist feels that the 3T MRI machine is not necessary, and the 1.5 images are sufficiently adequate. Any thoughts?
How can they be equal? Of course 3 Tesla is better. Softwares are different. Cost of 3T MR is over 10 times more expensive than 1.5 T MR. Images are more quality, deeper with less noise. Drop that urologist. Find a better one.
I was amazed that Cigna paid for my PETsmna scan. Great company
Exxcellent info going for ultrasound first and rhen the mri it will show all the info needed 4:32 4:32 4:33 4:34 4:35 4:41 4:41 4:41
From her comments, I take it that a 3T MRI is superior to a 1.5 MRI, adding that steep gradients are also important. Our urologist feels that the 3T MRI machine is not necessary,
and the 1.5 images are sufficiently adequate. Any thoughts?
How can they be equal? Of course 3 Tesla is better. Softwares are different. Cost of 3T MR is over 10 times more expensive than 1.5 T MR. Images are more quality, deeper with less noise. Drop that urologist. Find a better one.
I agree a 3t is much better Quality is always better reading the test is inportant 11:52 11:52 11:52
@@Hasan-jf7by We did. Thanks for advice.
@@charlesblumenstock9160 Thanks for your opinion. Will go with 3T.
Greate content.
Great job , maybe just a little too hurried as alot to take in ...
I agree. Especially if you are not a urologist/radiologist like myself.
Yeah you can see a little much. No yhank you.