Canon RF 15-35 | It's Glued To My Canon C70

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 93

  • @TroyMairs
    @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Welcome to the conversation everyone! What are your thoughts on the RF 15-35? Or are you using something different? I could talk camera stuff all day long!

    • @EdmundElijah
      @EdmundElijah ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Vintage only!
      Except for a Sigma 24-35mm f/2 that I will be using for talking heads. 😅

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just learned that sigma lens exists! I'm intrigued to say the least...
      You already know my new love of vintage glass! (Just broke out the set on a commerical yesterday!)

  • @chriset21
    @chriset21 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I use the 15-35 and 24-70 and I love it. I also have the speedbooster that I use with prims when it come to low light situations.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Can't go wrong with that set up! Speedboosted primes would be epic on low light

  • @jordonharrell736
    @jordonharrell736 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bro this video is a work of art! more people needs to see this channel!

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A work of art!? That's quite the compliment! Thank you, pumped to have you here :)

  • @mutantmanfred
    @mutantmanfred ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the same workhorse. I luv my RF 15-35 2.8 but with RS 3 PRO for me is too heavy setup. That's why I buy a smaller and lighter RF 14-35 f4.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh for sure, that full rig would be a lot to lug around all day! Great solution though, thanks for sharing your experience!

  • @Damien-og6sk
    @Damien-og6sk ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the 24-70 f2.8 RF and it is glued to my C70 most of the time, but I always carry the 16mm f2,8 RF in case I might need a larger field of view(it's so cheap, tiny and light)

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a tendency to shoot “tighter” than “wide” so the 24-70 on the c70 would be right in my wheelhouse as well!👍

  • @LonzosStudios
    @LonzosStudios ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's only going to get better for the RF lineup. RED is using the RF glass and I'm sure other companies are going to follow. I have that lens for about a year on my R5 and I love it...just picked up the C70 and I'm looking forward to shooting with it on the C70...Thanks for the video.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’d love to see more adoption of the RF, but it seems Canon/Red are playing it pretty close to the vest. Pros and Cons to that of course!
      I appreciate the comment!

  • @klyonn
    @klyonn ปีที่แล้ว

    I've only watched a minute of the video and stopped it. I stopped it cause I have to write this comment. And I rarely leave comments.
    This video is at the level of filmmaking that I don't ever find on TH-cam, there are these top TH-camrs in the sphere of filmmaking, and I watched their videos for their personality, but this one video just keeps me interesting with its editing AND the quality is there AND I like your personality. My man, just keep it up, please

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey man! I know its taken me a long time to respond to this, but I want you to know I've been thinking about this comment just about every day. I can't tell you how much I appreciate such kind support. This is just the best response you could hope for when you put something you created out in to the world. Thank you!

  • @mb-watches
    @mb-watches ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this one. As I just shoot on the R7 and R10 the F2,8 is just an f-stop to less. Would like to see a modern sigma rfs 16-35 but well, ain’t gonna happen. If I would go fullframe the 15-35 would be a tad to wide for my taste. Using the rf16mm as wide angle on an r5 or r6 and the the 24 f1,8 plus a 24-70 seems More versatile. Did try the 15-35 on my r7, image itself was great, but still, I sort of missed this one f stop and for that amount of money canon asks for this lens, well…
    Keep up the good work, really enjoyed this one 🙏🏻

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great insights, thanks for commenting and I'm glad you enjoyed the vid! I can sympathize, 2.8 is right on fence for me as well. I think we'll have to look to primes though if we want some more light coming through out lenses!

  • @CristianMercadoYT
    @CristianMercadoYT ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video Troy!

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for your support of the channel Cristian!

  • @ItsBerg
    @ItsBerg ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video my dude.. C70 crop is actually 1.45x, so a 15mm has a 21.75mm FF equiv, so basically 22mm, and on the long end @ 35 it’s 50.75, so basically 51mm 😉.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the kind words, pumped to have you here! I appreciate the info, hopefully a few others can see this too!

    • @ItsBerg
      @ItsBerg ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TroyMairs keep it up dude, your content is amazing!! I wanted to ask you, what did you use for your titles? They were super clean and I wanted to use that style on a documentary I’m currently filming with the c70. What title pack or font and animations did you use? Super dope stuff!

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you again!💯 The titles I’ve been using (and love) are from Motion VFX, the mKeynote collection I believe!
      Happy editing!!

  • @CiprianTrip
    @CiprianTrip ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So far it's the only RF L glass that's usable with a crop sensor. The available RF L primes are way too narrow for this camera. I wish the C70 was full frame.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      I hear that! The wide angle RF glass is really lacking as of current, I'd love to see a few L series primes make it out!
      Thanks for checking out the vid!

  • @avdpost
    @avdpost ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The crop comparison for field of view is actually a little wider on the c70 since it's a larger sensor than the typical apsc. It's closer to a 1.45 if you compare it to a c500. But if you compare it to an R5C its actually 1.37 believe it or not. Heck if you are comparing it to an FX6 the c70 is actually only a 1.3 crop vs the FX6 full frame sensor. So the 15-35 is more like a 20-50mm f4 in full frame equivalent terms.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the insight on this! I've read bits and pieces of people talking about what the true "factor" was on the c70, but it's nice to see it all in one place!
      I haven't seen the comparison to the Fx6 from a field of view perspective though, that's honestly wild! You'd think there would be a "standard" as to what constituted full-frame, super35, etc. But I suppose its a bit of a moving target.
      Thanks again for passing along the knowledge!

    • @avdpost
      @avdpost ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TroyMairs You're welcome! From my undestanding it's a little extra confusing since Sony built their cinema sensors around the standard full frame sensor size of 36x24mm while Canon decided to make their C500 sensor size and aspect ratio wider at 38x20mm. So while it's not as tall as true full frame, it's actually a little bit wider, and therefore has a wider field of view when using the same lenses. So since Canon built the C70 around the similar cinema style sensors, it also has a wider aspect ratio and size at 26mmx14mm. it's all splitting hairs a bit, but it also shows how different the world of sensor sizes are between cameras.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How interesting! It really is a "splitting hairs" situation, but its funny how much it seems to matter to all of us :) Lol
      This is some great information to know if for no other reason than understanding what's going on "under the hood" while you're creating. I think being intimately familiar with your equipment is important, so thanks again Aaron!

  • @wolexismedia
    @wolexismedia ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video Troy! What software or plugin do you use for your text overlay? It’s simple and lovely

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for the kind words! I really appreciate it!
      I use MotionVFX for EVERYTHING! TH-cam and client work, I love it!
      You saw the mKeynote pack in action here in this video: mvfx.co/TroyMairs.

  • @TMVVisualMedia
    @TMVVisualMedia ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video was so clean!! Loved the graphic titles. This video has inspired me to step up my talking head videos.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's really cool of you to say, thank you so much! I've found that the work I've been putting into my TH-cam videos has really helped me improve the footage I shoot for clients. It's a great place to practice/experiment!
      Thanks again, pumped to have you here!

  • @nidoge5032
    @nidoge5032 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! 15-35 is always glued to my R5C too. What Graphic titles are you using? They're so clean

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! Its one of the few lenses I think I'll always own. The graphics are a set from Motion VFX (mVFX) for Resolve. They've got some top-notch options in there, I use a lot of them!

  • @photographybydaniellee
    @photographybydaniellee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dreaming about a tripod! I have found my people!

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welcome home brother! :)

  • @chrischiles6263
    @chrischiles6263 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've been running the EF 24-105 mkII with the speed booster. The lens has 4 stops of stabilization, and when paired with the speedbooster it makes the lens essentially an f2.8. All of that with the full range of 24-105mm? It hasn't left my camera since I put it on, almost feels like cheating.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yoo that's a cool idea! I haven't run across anyone running that, its a solid combination you've got there!

    • @robhayward3962
      @robhayward3962 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is the setup I use, it's so good that it's stopped me moving into RF glass. The 24 - 105 range with the speedbooster is perfect.

  • @neverenoughadventure
    @neverenoughadventure ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @TroyMairs thanks for the beautiful video, you convey such a chill, but knowledgeable vibe! One quick tip: it was hard for me to ignore the background music, especially in the intro. Maybe reduce the treble in the background track or tone it down a notch. Looking forward to your next videos! 👏

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you so much! And I truly appreciate the feedback! Audio is definitely a weak point of mine, so this type of feedback is helpful. Thanks again and I'm glad to have you along for the ride!

  • @dvdaltizer2
    @dvdaltizer2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video bro! I've been using the 16-35 on the speed booster.. but I've been wanting to maybe get the RF 15-35 instead!

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks David, I really appreciate you saying that! If I were in your shoes, it would all hinge on image stabilization! I think the two lenses are equally great when it comes to the glass, do you shoot much handheld?

    • @dvdaltizer2
      @dvdaltizer2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TroyMairs I shoot a ton handheld! I guess that answers it doesn't it? LOL

    • @BrandonTalbot
      @BrandonTalbot ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dave the 15-35 is so so good.

    • @dvdaltizer2
      @dvdaltizer2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@BrandonTalbot I just enjoy the proper manual focus and the speed booster! Gives me more "wide" and that extra stop of light! Ugh... so frustrating the C70 isn't full frame!

    • @BrandonTalbot
      @BrandonTalbot ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dvdaltizer2 man could you imagine a full frame C70!? And I love manually focusing and I too use the hell out of the TURBOBOOSTER! I just have the Viltrox version.

  • @prskyviews
    @prskyviews ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesomeness right here!

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      YES!! This is the kind of comment everyone's hoping for here on the internet! Thanks for the hype, pumped to have you here!

  • @georgebloomberg8656
    @georgebloomberg8656 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for sharing ur video-very nice! What is the white liquid which u used on back of lens? Some kind of lubricant or?

    • @georgebloomberg8656
      @georgebloomberg8656 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh I got it ) it’s a joke like u want keep lens by clue hahaha

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol!! I’m glad the joke landed! Haha

  • @creatioexnihilo4125
    @creatioexnihilo4125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really cool review, thanks.
    Could you do a go through the Menu settings? I have this camera since today and it's very different to the R.
    Isn't it possible to switch between pal and NTSC for framerate? And why I can't change the shutter speed manualy?

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Much appreciated!! It can take some getting used to when coming from a mirrorless body like the R. I’ll add a system setting walk thru to my list!
      You can change the frequency of the camera to better suit pal frame rates in the menu system. I personally prefer to use a shutter angle (180deg) in this camera over shutter speed. It takes some of the user error out of switching frame rates.
      Thanks for commenting and watching the vid! Cheers!

    • @creatioexnihilo4125
      @creatioexnihilo4125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TroyMairs thank you. That's helpful

  • @RexxReviews
    @RexxReviews ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have you managed getting the lens off the camera yet?

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol! Nope, she's glued on there for good

    • @RexxReviews
      @RexxReviews ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TroyMairs 🤣

  • @RGHB212
    @RGHB212 ปีที่แล้ว

    one minute in to the video, I thought that was already a sub. Great content bro keep it up

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Pumped to have you here and I truly appreciate the encouragement! Thank you!

  • @biobazar
    @biobazar ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have compare with the EF 16mm-35mm ? because the AF is the samething in EF and RF if is the same years production... BUT the IS is not here with the EF, but i like the Canon adapter 0.71x is a real protector for your sensor and you give 1 stop with

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      The stabilization is the biggest difference between the two models in my opinion. The 16-35 is far from obsolete! I hadn't considered the speedbooster being a layer of protection, but that's a viable point! Thanks for commenting!

  • @sebmonti5904
    @sebmonti5904 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A dream about tripod 😂

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish I was making this up😂

  • @eifionjones8513
    @eifionjones8513 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for sharing - enjoying your videos. Would be nice to see some of your footage if you can show it. I’m using EF 17-55 2.8 for similar use case as your 15-35 on my c70. I’ve got the Sigma 18-35 when I want that clean, sharp and shallow look or I sometimes use it with the speedbooster (no vignetting at 24-35mm) for some stylised ‘less accurate’ shots. Also vintage Pentax and Helios primes with the speedbooster for more character shots. I use the Ef 24-70 f4 on my R6 as b cam. I’m quite invested in Ef lenses from the old days and I’m also an MF guy - how does the focus by wire feel for MF on the 15-35? Native lenses is a big plus though - I don’t love either the pass through adapter or the speedbooster tbh

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you’re on the same page as I am! This is great for the clean/sharp look, but there are some vintage lenses in my studio now that I’m particularly excited about for some added character in camera. :)
      Thanks for the feedback on including more footage examples, I’ll try to implement that moving forward.
      Pumped to have you here 🔥

    • @rudyvanos
      @rudyvanos ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you are right about the 17-55. I had it for the C100 ii and it's a lovely inexpensive lens with better reach than the 15-35, and much lighter with that. 35mm is just too wide at the long end. Going to 55mm will give you more separation too. The price difference is insane. The 15-35 makes more sense if you (also) own a camera like your R6. On the C70 you don't use like half of the lens!
      I also would have liked to see some actual real world footage. Still cool vid

  • @JoshBirman
    @JoshBirman ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the review! Nice job

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Josh! I appreciate the comment 👍

  • @dylanproctordp
    @dylanproctordp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No footage? Also, what is stops of image stablisation ain't no way that's measurable

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had a very similiar question about image stabilization when I first heard the term! Stops of image stabilization are a measurement of how slow a shutter speed can be used to produce a sharp image. Each stop refers to how many times you can cut your shutter speed in half and still shoot handheld

  • @TheAugusts
    @TheAugusts ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Haha the glue in your thumbnail made me click. 😂 such a sick lens 👊

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Ahh, then the thumbnail did its job! Haha, rest assured, no lenses were harmed in the making of this video! lol

  • @doug_EX
    @doug_EX 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why Canon did not added an option for us to choose the amount of focus throw is mind boggling.

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That would be an awesome feature! You wouldn't think it'd be too hard to implement, but I'm no engineer! Lol

  • @smakujem3966
    @smakujem3966 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why not RF 24-70 2.8? Do you find it to tight?
    I don't know what to buy for my C70 becasue I love 24-70 on full frame, yet there is no 24-70 EF with such great IS like RF. Sigma 24-70 has IS but supposedly it's marginal. And it's Sigma (lower resell value) not Canon. RF 15-35 is tempting but I'll lose longer end of 24-70, which can be useful at times. Such a mess

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I feel your pain! Lol I do find the 24/70 to be just a bit too tight to be crowned “the most universal” lens for the C70. I currently pair the 15-35 with a 70-200 for the longer focal lengths. Truth be told I find that to be a bit too much, so I’m considering selling it and opting for a 50 or 85mm prime to better compliment the 15-35 to pick up those tighter shots and get even better separation and lowlight performance

    • @smakujem3966
      @smakujem3966 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TroyMairs Yea, it would be great combo, but then you have to switch lenses. I used to love primes but nowadays I just prefer to have one lens that does it all. Of course there is time you need to switch lenses, but 24-70 just delievers in most cases. I even prefer to use it on commercials, because on set it could be chaos even without swtiching.
      So i guess I'll buy Sigma 24-70 with speedbooster. But first I'll rent RF 15-35, to give it a try.
      btw for a very long time I was rolling with 18-55 kit and 50 1.8, it was such a cheap combo yet you can do almost everything with it. But after trying 24-70 you can't go back. For now this is my only complain for C70, other then that it's spectacular for it's price

  • @baekmedier
    @baekmedier ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should stick to RF lenses... but do your self the favor and get the 70-200 f2.8 (then you get the wanted bokeh)
    I my self uses the EF glas.. but thats because of the speedbooster i use for the C70 (The iso is constant on iso 800)
    The R5C needs ND after using the C70... and they only have the adaptor with ND that changes the mount to EF... :P
    And then im left with my R3.. and it didnt make any sense not getting a adaptor for that when the other two is in need of EF because of the adaptors.
    Regarding sharpness i have found sigma to be way sharper than Canon if thats what you are looking for in lenses

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      You make some great points! That B-Cam angle is actually on the RF 70-200 attached to an R7! Heck of a lens! :) I'm spoiled by internal ND as well, I won't be able to go back , lol!
      You've got some stellar bodies to work with, the R3 often lives in the back of my mind, but to the above point, I want the internal ND's...
      I've actually never shot with Sigma's stuff, but I've been considering their EF primes, specifically the 28mm. Do you have a favorite Sigma?

    • @baekmedier
      @baekmedier ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@TroyMairs 24 mm Art serie lens is super sharp :) love that lens... but no weather sealing.. and I shoot sports together with coporate... so I (Think) need that.
      or the 50mm and the 85mm Art compared to canons L series lenses.. Sigma is just sharper over all I find.
      I dont know if they have any good crop sensor lenses, but their full frame stuff from the ART series is crazy good.
      R3 is a good kamera... but for foto... the menu is super hard to navigate when your brain is used to the R5C and the C70 cinema menu.. byt it has a crisp image.. more "sharp"/"detailed" than the C70.. and it is always winning in low light.. - But then again if you have desent lighting conditions the C70 is mor "Movie/filmic" and has nicer shadows and blacks... where the R5C looks more like sony cameras with a crazy sharpness that you almost always want to diale back a little in post when put together with the C70 :P
      So actually they are not always the perfect match together right out of the camera... but they do shoot the same gamma and gammut (if you dial the C70 back to c-log 3)

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol I'm the same way when it comes to weather sealing! I always think I need it, maybe I do, but I rarely actually find myself in situations to truly take advantage of it. I guess it just takes one time you're caught in the rain and your glad you have it!

    • @baekmedier
      @baekmedier ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TroyMairs exactly my thoughts

  • @shawnlabranche6852
    @shawnlabranche6852 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, but that glue scene had me cringing lol

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol! :) Sorry to put you through that! Rest assured, no lenses were harmed in the making of this vid!

    • @shawnlabranche6852
      @shawnlabranche6852 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TroyMairs 😂 thank goodness

  • @BryanBenoitPhoto
    @BryanBenoitPhoto ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I want to see the glue on the actual lens or it is not true 😅

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      My photoshop skills probably aren’t good enough to make that believable 😂

  • @TJ-po9ol
    @TJ-po9ol ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Its real crop factor is 1.37

    • @TroyMairs
      @TroyMairs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Could be, I see quite a few numbers floating around out there.