Resultant of Concurrent Force Systems Part 1 (Statics of Rigid Bodies)

Hi guys! We will discuss Statics of Rigid Bodies particularly about Resultant of Concurrent Force Systems Part 1. We will solve several examples to illustrate them. Happy learning and enjoy watching! #enginerdmath #statics #forcesandcomponents
Forces and Components Part 1
• Forces and Components ...
Forces and Components Part 2
• Forces and Components ...
Resultant of Concurrent Force Systems Part 1
• Resultant of Concurren...
Resultant of Concurrent Force Systems Part 2
• Resultant of Concurren...
Moment of a Force
• Moment of a Force Part...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @enginerdmath

[@kellyjaysalcedo4286]

Mas malinaw pa pag-explain dito kesa sa teacher namin ngayon.

[@earl9936]

Thank you po ng marami... Life saver ka po kung alam nyo lang😭

[@beans.3893]

Na gets ko na sawakas salamat po

[@ecclesiastes9.11]

salamat, sir Engr! may God bless you, sir, and your YT channel more!

[@RosieDulay-nw9sp]

Thank you po, Engr.!!

[@lance6749]

sir bat po sa bandang 29:57...30° yung ginamit... diba po ba dapat 60°?? kasi summation of Y yung kinukuha natin?

[@sn4pper_official]

Notice aswell

[@jusway_]

thanks, engr!!

[@Christian-rv8fd]

sa number 4 po.
Bakit sinusbsitute yung resultant sa summation? eh diba po bago makuha yung resultant need pa gawing pythagorean...so bale hindi dapat pwede isubstitute kasi unkown pa din yung summation of x and y.
SANA MAASAGOT

[@johnmichaelgetutua2304]

Sa problem 1 po, bakit hindi 300 sin 30° po? Eh dpat 300 sin 30° for Fy kasi hindi naman Fx ang kinuha

[@coreenuy7276]

i have a question lang po sa problem 1 bakit wala pong naka lagay na direction or cos tita yung 400?

[@lalasings_1]

sir sa problem 6 po yung 500 po is nasa fx lang dibali po wala siyang fy? bakit parin po siya inadd sa summation of forces in y?

[@arjayanusencion2308]

Coplanar din po ba 'yan sir?

[@Christian-rv8fd]

pwede pang hanapin yung resultant magnitude nung number 3 po diba

[@user-wm3mx7cx7u]

pwede po yung sa 3rd edition naman po na book ni Ferdinand L. Singer

[@josephlordmombay9733]

Anong app ginagamit niyo Sir para sa pag expalin po TY

[@LanceG]

sa 29:58 po paano po naging sin(30°) po hindi po ba dapat sin(60°) yun sir medyo nalito po ako sa part na yon po sir. Thank you po for your response, sir

[@riccivillena3986]

kasi po 90°-60°

[@Christian-rv8fd]

@@riccivillena3986 pero bakit dun sa bandang 17 mins po. Hindi siya nagsubtract ng 30 doon sa 90. Kasi diba dapat 90-30 doon sa 200lb. So dapat magiging 200 sin30

[@elle4080]

kasi, nag iba napo yung reference angle, therefore, ang basehan is yung 90-60, kasi kinuha natin yung angle 30 with respect to reference angle of 90 minus 60.

[@christianlingatong970]

Anyone in 2024😅

[@alexanderwilliams5602]

sir, can u send us a file of the work u wrote down on the iPad so that we can review it again salamat po.

[@MarkVincentPajarilla]

Sir ung sa summation po ng x po Diba dapat 300 lb.

[@MarkVincentPajarilla]

Ung sa #1 po

[@jhayrhex4448]

Sir thanks po ❤️