Descartes Meditation VI: Of the existence of material things, & the distinction between mind & body
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
- Join George and John as they discuss and debate different Philosophical ideas. In this video they will be completing the discussion on Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy and looking into the sixth and final meditation.
In this video they will look at Descartes acceptance of the existence of a material world. As Descartes started off the meditations in a state of full doubt, by the end his fully believes in a physical external world. Is he justified in believing so, and is his reasoning sound?
In addition to this Descartes discusses the relation between mind and body. This is known as the Dualist mode of thought. Is the mind and body separate, and is it right to agree that if they are separate they can still intermingle.
Watch as George and John debate the final meditation in the series.
This script is part of the Philosophy Vibe "Descartes Meditations" eBook, available on Amazon:
mybook.to/phil...
Check out the Philosophy Vibe merchandise store: philosophy-vib...
#descartes #meditations #philosophy
![Megan Thee Stallion - Neva Play (feat. RM) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TpYTyAaTRts/mqdefault.jpg)
The script to this video is part of the Philosophy Vibe "Descartes Meditations" eBook, available on Amazon:
mybook.to/philosophyvibe7
this video series was super helpful for my Philosophy midterm. Thank you guys so much
A pleasure, glad we could help. Wishing you the best of luck for your midterms.
same! my midterm is in 2 hours and these videos are the only thing i understand!
This is a really helpful video, but I noticed that Elizabeth of Bohemia is not cited in the same way that Hobbes and Locke are, despite Elizabeth raising the main concern about how the mind and body can interact if they are separate substances.
These videos save all my essays. Amazing work here, concise and on point.
Glad we could help. Best of luck in the essays.
"Hmmm" indeed.
All joking aside, this series was very informative. Thank you, guys!
Pleasure, thank you for watching.
Thank you million time you have the ability to explain this better than all books in aver concise and clear way🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
Thanks so much. Happy we could help 😀
These are really useful for studying while i commute to college as a refresher for my readings. Thank you! They're concise and I like how you challenge his points as to better explain them
Glad you find these useful :)
5:55 talks about the distinction between mind & body
Cannot believe how much this channel helps me in regards to essay work. Thank you🙏🏻
You're welcome, best of luck with the essay.
where the heck have you guys been ?!!! it's been a very Kong time since your last episode !!
please don't go away like that ever again , I thought you were done with this channel , keep the great work up !
much love .
So sorry! It was a busy couple of weeks and there was delays in getting the video out 😔
The animation takes time so it's hard to keep to a consistent schedule. Will try not to leave such a big gap again.
So glad you are enjoying the videos though 😁
interesting that dualism went out of fashion with the advent of psychology, psychoanalysis , biochemistry etc but looks to be re-entering the picture now with virtual reality etc.
Great observation! Completely agree.
Thank you . I just had to read an entire book for Descartes meditations , and I couldn’t understand a lot. However you , just made all sense. Thank you !!!
You're welcome, glad we could help.
im so grateful for these summaries thank you omg!!
You're very welcome, thanks for watching.
Thank you for this series... was really helpful for my exams
Glad we could help :)
Hmm, I see
Thank you so much for this! Very interesting and informative. A huge help :)
A pleasure, thank you for watching.
Have my philosophy final in 2 hours read meditation 4 times your explanation just made me understand
Glad we could help, best of luck in the final.
@@PhilosophyVibe got my score back 100/100
The was great, I Kant praise it enough 😩❤
Excellent video. I agree with the last point, that Descartes argument is only logical with the assumption that an omniscient and benevolent God created the universe. But what if we are in a simulation and our senses are being deceived not by God, but by something else or some kind of non benevolent creator? Can you do a video on Solipsism? Descartes said "I think, therefore i am" but can you explore the idea of "I observe, therefore I am". Because some would argue that we can not even be entirely sure that we are the true authors of our thoughts, they would say that thoughts pop into our mind, and we merely observe the thought seconds after our brain made the decision, giving the illusion that we are thinking. I know that somewhat gets into the free will vs determinism and axiom of causality debates that you've already covered.
Solipsism is definitely a topic we will be covering!
You sir helped us a lot. It is a request if you could add subtitles to your videos
Thank you, the video was really helpful for my midterm :)
A pleasure, best of luck in the midterm.
super helpful, thank you guys so much! the gentleman in purple raised all the same questions I was thinking. appreciate it!
A pleasure, thank you for watching.
Lucky doctor and charming patient
Finals prep!
Thank you so much 🥲
You’re welcome 😊
Very helpful
Abrahamic religions would claim that God is a deceiver. Stories like the Binding where God does deceive and test Abrahams faith.
"it is prudent never to trust completely those who have deceived us even once", this would nullify Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc. Right?
The commentary and reactions are actually very helpful. They validate some of my thoughts and answer some of my questions. Thank you!
Very glad you enjoyed it, thank you for watching :)
"They caught", "They're hard", "They thought" but never Descartes! lol
its a really helpful video but its really hard to get through because of the audio quality, only complaint really.
Merci
Hi! I was wondering why the objection against Descartes argument about how it is possible for the two to interact if they are separate and distinct and totally different was not strong. Is it because you can conceive of a way between the two to interact?
Thank you.
Welcome!
Why did Rene believe God can’t be a deceiver?
Because there is a certain imperfection inherent in deception. For instance, why would you need to deceive if you are all-powerful? You can just make things be. He also adds a moral argument that deception is bad essentially but I found that less convincing.
I see. 😐
Video was a banger though we need more people like you in the world ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thank you, glad you liked it :)
Can u get a better mic
Well, we like to think of ourselves as the Black Metal of TH-cam :)
3:46
As a Christian I believe everything has a tripartite nature. It's my belief that philosophy and science both suffer from what I call the oneness fallacy.