Q&A With a Harvard Admissions Officer | Harvard Admissions Podcast
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2023
- In this episode of the Harvard Admissions Podcast, Julia chats with Li-Ming, an admissions officer who reads many applications from students based in Africa. Listen and learn more information about Harvard that's useful for international applicants.
Follow our socials -
TikTok: / harvardadmissions
Instagram: / harvard_admissions
Twitter: / applytoharvard
Facebook: / harvardadmissions
Website: college.harvard.edu/admissions
Content Lab: contentlab.college.harvard.edu/
#Harvard #College #Admissions
Thank you
Is there more advantage for Canada citizens to apply for Ivy colleges than international students who study in Canada high school? Many thanks.
Both are considered international students to ivys
❤
I love u lovely ladies
good morning y'all
Hi
How r u
@@enderD-np7vv not good actually
i got a math exam in 4 hours and I have no idea of the stuff appearing
can't a computer just calculate test/iq scores? why do human admissions officers still exist? and.. what's the point of college? they don't pay well for all the work you have to perform.
Bro a smart human is not just a valedictorian who have perfect SAT or ACT scores, who only knows how to study well and get straights As in a row, just a machine of perfection, a human is a human, not a machine, and a computer or an ai by any mean, can't decide whether that person is smarter than that person, nor a human can do, but still, admission officers are humans, have memories, experiences, can feel the applicant while reading his application, which a machine cannot do, this is why their role is crucial + Well colleges still exist because they are somehow essential for pre qualification in the majority of countries, and sometimes the tools provided by a college cannot be foudn somewhere else to be more creative and productive. + Unis do not admit students based solely on whether they are smart or stupid.
@@imaginationpictures correct, humans aren't machines which is why admissions is biased. also, they don't have the capacity to 'get to know' everyone on a human level so they're left with test scores as the only objective measure of a person's ability. now we know that under affirmative action they were admitting people based on race rather than academic achievement. do you think they should use skin color as a valid metric or should we move it on over to iq?
@@_xBrokenxDreamsx_ Yeah true ur right, well, I believe an admission officer must be someone who read each application with care, regardless of their massive volume, maybe the decision dates may be delayed, and I think, what if unis make an admission as a compeition? Like, a very fair competition where only who deserve to get admitted will get there, like smthg more than just grades and SATs etc...
@@imaginationpictures anyone can lie to make themselves look good on an application. if we aren't using the 10+ years of objective academic results then what's the point?
@@_xBrokenxDreamsx_ Yes true but bro, it's easy and obvious to know if someone lies or no, and easier if there are interviews + trust me admission officers really can tell an authentic and a non authentic application