Tractor tax: 'Government hit everyone when they didn't mean to'

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 568

  • @hivltg
    @hivltg หลายเดือนก่อน +120

    This is probably the best interview I have seen. Very level-headed and clear on the issues.

    • @SGProductions87
      @SGProductions87 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dude has politician energy

    • @matthew_jw1318
      @matthew_jw1318 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She tried a gotcha moment and he didn't bite..

    • @chrisclose8356
      @chrisclose8356 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A well spoken thoughtful farmer,but wrong on the details! The threshold ISN’T 1 million,it’s 3 million ( for most) which makes a mockery of the suggested 600K bill, but nice try😮

    • @xiaobaozha
      @xiaobaozha หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@chrisclose8356exactly, totally undermining his own arguments against the new policy.

    • @ladygardener100
      @ladygardener100 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@chrisclose8356 the treasury forgot to add the value of the assets in addition to the actual land, and that can be huge, a combine harvester can be £250K these days, plus a few tractors, and a few hundred cattle, soon get tp £3 million. Trying to grab tax from investors has failed because they are too clever to pay when their plan was to avoid UK taxes. They will just move more money out of the UK to tax havens, so that won't work.

  • @vannustube
    @vannustube หลายเดือนก่อน +182

    Mr Farmer here makes the point really well at the end.
    Wealthy folk who buy a small farm avoid the inheritance tax, while generational farmers who need scale to run the farm as a business get hit by it...

    • @joskowal3711
      @joskowal3711 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yep they would be better served by an incremental reduction in the limit to dissuade tax dodgers and drive down the value of farmland.

    • @chy4919
      @chy4919 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      He's more pissed his accountant wasn't given enough time to figure out how to tax dodge.

    • @rollthetape88
      @rollthetape88 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@chy4919 its not that though, hes 'pissed' because there was no warning on the rug pull, they followed the Agricultural Property Relief (APR), they didn't need to use the 7 year rule, then the goal posts changed.

    • @barnigranero5882
      @barnigranero5882 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      He is misinformed about the inheritance tax though.
      It's 3 million when the tax starts, not 1 million.
      So 200,000 to be paid back over ten years.
      20,000 per year.
      The way he describes his business suggests he makes enough to pay 20,000 per year.

    • @davidmaguire3521
      @davidmaguire3521 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I still don't understand why farmers think they should get special treatment and not pay the taxes the rest of us do while taking every subsidy they can. How much do they want from us?

  • @Geedeesa
    @Geedeesa หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    I really don't see why landowners, which includes farmers, should receive preferential tax treatment. Inheritance tax should apply to all CONSISTENTLY.
    There are better ways to subsidise farmers if that's necessary. Subsidising ALL landowners, including billionaires, as a way of compensating food farmers for low profits doesn't make sense.
    So I'd support the government in raising the rate of taxation to the same level as everyone else - but suggest the government reviews the profitability for farmers. The British Farming sector has lost the farm subsidies the EU provided - so perhaps that's where their real problems lies.

    • @hughhorne7009
      @hughhorne7009 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I completley agree, However id first make farming profitable and then tax them. An obvious fix would be for govt to stop importing food that can been grown, or got, here in the UK.

    • @kptweety
      @kptweety หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      I don't see why the government should have an inheritance tax in the first place. Why should my son have to pay when he inherits my property? I've already paid stamp duty on it. These governments spend money without care or caution and then the lower and middle class suffer as a result.

    • @Pemmont107
      @Pemmont107 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Because they grow our food.

    • @strongstories3183
      @strongstories3183 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because we have given all the bargaining power to super markets and stock exchanges so that farmers receive a pittance compared to the consumer price. They don't have the money to pay the bill after they inherit the farm and therefore will have to sell to big farming companies/ investors

    • @scapingby
      @scapingby หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      it's incredible how anyone can seriously hold this view. Farmers have paper wealth but they're otherwise earning adverage to low incomes. They don't have workplace pensions, sick leave, holiday pay etc. They're custodians of land that we all benefit from. If we didn't have farmers in the second world war, we would have starved. We had no way to import food at the beginning of the war. Taxing people out of farming will mean future generations will sell their farmland and move into the city. Farmland will get turned into other assets such as housing or wind farms. If we need to restart food production again, we cant. Farmers are highly skilled/ experienced over a lifetime and farmland doesn't just appear out of thin area when its needed. Food security is the single most important reason to ensure farmers are protected from IHT. All Labour need to do is heighten the threshold to a reasonable level.

  • @MrMonkey-o5j
    @MrMonkey-o5j หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    I disagree with inheritance tax full stop no matter what the circumstances are of a person.

    • @rafrick
      @rafrick หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why? I personally will be subject to it. If vast amounts of wealth are passed on and on, it ensures that select groups of people remain in very privileged positions through birth. The next generations should be prepared to build their own wealth and not just rely on family money and assets being passed down to them.

    • @MrMonkey-o5j
      @MrMonkey-o5j หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @rafrick OK so using farmers as an example. We are talking generational knowledge passed down through the years. They'd know when to sow seeds and when to harvest and they know how best to be good custodians of the countryside.
      A multi national company will create inferior food should the knowledgeable farmer be replaced.
      I want to work hard and leave a legacy for my son. What's wrong with that?

    • @bradr7607
      @bradr7607 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cut all tax avoidance schemes, offshore tax havens and other gimmicks that only benefit the rich. It is the rich and powerful who have manipulated the tax system in this country to their benefit. They screamed businesses would collapse when the minimum wage was introduced, they didn’t. Why are Amazon and other multinational companies allowed to do business in this country without paying their fair share of taxes.

    • @trytwicelikemice3190
      @trytwicelikemice3190 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MrMonkey-o5jyou say no matter the circumstances, then return to a very specific one for your example 😂
      We live in a country that still contains an aristocracy, with much of the nation's money locked up in hereditary estates. And on a lower level, those who's parents missed out on the housing boom of last century now face a massive hurdle to buy their first property, while those whose family already own property can cash in. This will drive towards a new class division.
      My Dad worked very hard and passed on a legacy to me. This included money, enough to help but under the tax threshold, but also values, life lessons, skills, the opportunities his parenting gave me when he was alive, and his generational knowledge. Those were more important than the money... we can all pass such things on to our children, and it will never be taxed.

    • @dippydogz
      @dippydogz หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rafrickthis next generation and most likely the next after that will often have been working the farm since childhood before the sitting owner dies.

  • @dogzero1
    @dogzero1 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    The trouble is, the very rich farmers have managed to convince these new tax changes will affect all farmers when it won't. It will only affect the rich wealthy landowners who dodge paying their fair share of taxes. The low IQ gullible farmers marching in support of rich land owning tax dodgers. Clarkson is banking on the public and the normal farmers falling for this BS. Clarkson admitted in 2021 that he only bought his land to avoid paying inheritance tax. He's a rich maggot. As for farm machinery and livestock, those are not included despite these rich people saying so. Most are offset against tax etc.

    • @justindawson6724
      @justindawson6724 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Your rank with Bourgeoisie hate .
      Buy a farm produce something and stfu .

  • @michaelgoode9555
    @michaelgoode9555 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    Rich people always seem to have so much power when it comes to paying their taxes. It's fine for ordinary working people who are not asset or cash rich to bear the biggest tax burden for 70 years due to the tories.
    As soon as wealthier people find themselves paying the taxes then we all have to cry for them.
    Greed is a truly vile thing.

    • @janeharper9329
      @janeharper9329 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      well said

    • @jamesbarbour8400
      @jamesbarbour8400 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The biggest tax burden in many generations, has been brought about by the Labour Party, not the Tories - get your 'facts' right !

    • @henryburton6529
      @henryburton6529 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly

    • @kelvinlambert4249
      @kelvinlambert4249 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      So is Envy.

    • @anthonyrybicki1000
      @anthonyrybicki1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Very deeply engrained in Britain as landowners didn't pay a penny in taxes until reforms in the 19th century. Most rich people find exemptions just for being rich. Any asset which appreciates in value should be taxed from shares to property.

  • @maneshipocrates2264
    @maneshipocrates2264 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    Poor in cash but millionaire by asset.

    • @seijakarjalainen
      @seijakarjalainen หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      They can be cash poor because we all over Europe pay their bills through subsidies.

    • @tomgreene1843
      @tomgreene1843 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      @@seijakarjalainen not correct ....no subsidies means dearer food or no country food reliance ...remember the last war ?

    • @kalicom2937
      @kalicom2937 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      @@seijakarjalainen Errr, UK is not part of the EU anymore and our farmers do not get EU subsidies under the CAP.

    • @KimThomas-vp4vm
      @KimThomas-vp4vm หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@seijakarjalainen English farmers don't get any subsidies, that stopped when we left the EU.

    • @piotrwojdelko1150
      @piotrwojdelko1150 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      i wish i could have a little bit land for veggie patch

  • @ECECECECEC
    @ECECECECEC หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    £1.5 million allowance for a single person, £3 million allowance for a couple so lying from the outset both the farmer and the reporter. Btw also half the rate everyone else has to pay and 10 years interest free to pay iht.

    • @tomgreene1843
      @tomgreene1843 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Everyone else is not a farmer...farmers should pay inheritance tax on their house like all others ...unless they don't own their houses by having a council house or being a tenant.

    • @Fab666.
      @Fab666. หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How exactly does that work? 1.5m for single person or 3m for a couple. Unless they die simultaneously

    • @anthonycraig1458
      @anthonycraig1458 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They don't need to die simultaneously, it can be years apart so any unspent allowance from the first parent can be taken into account when the second parent dies.

  • @WaheedRafiq
    @WaheedRafiq หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    😂 this whole inheritance tax has become a utter joke 🤣 let just tax the poor and yeah then send the money aboard to fight other nations wars make senses doesn't it 😮

    • @seijakarjalainen
      @seijakarjalainen หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ukraine to my understanding does not import its food even during war time. What is the excuse by British farmers for the fact that UK has to import almost half of its food during peace time despite subsidies and tax breaks given to British farmers.

    • @robcorbett4136
      @robcorbett4136 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@seijakarjalainenthe 'excuse' is consumer choice and lack of produce in the UK that consumers want

    • @Geedeesa
      @Geedeesa หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@seijakarjalainen _ Bananas don't grow very well in the UK.

    • @drcommonsense1
      @drcommonsense1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree. Everyone else is subject to inheritance tax. If I inherit my parents home and can't afford it I lose it. It is my responsibility and also partly my parents to make sure I can afford it. Why can't they just get life insurances? Surely that is a far more cheaper contingency? Most of us take it out when we have something we want to protect so they should do the same.

    • @legendaryjonblue
      @legendaryjonblue หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't forget the endless stream of illegal migrants. £8 billion a year to keep the asylum con going

  • @jamiefly
    @jamiefly หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    He employs 50+ people so he's essentially an SME, likely to be a limited company and wants tax fiddles to continue... He's not poor just not organised and enjoying the trappings.. Also the factory he's got for meat processing isn't really farming it's the rearing of the animals... I think he knows most of us don't understand how it works but a few do... They aren't a special case and need to pay their fare dues.. the party is over whilst the Tories are out of power...

    • @robertmaitland8728
      @robertmaitland8728 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Here we have a Conservative businessman trying to avoid paying tax. Suck it up Sir.

    • @kalicom2937
      @kalicom2937 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Oh boy, the level of ignorance is shocking. But Kier Starmer relies on that, doesn't he?

    • @George57
      @George57 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It’s pure greed . They would be happy to see the taxes piled onto income tax to pay for their greed as well

    • @lythalls
      @lythalls หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@kalicom2937🤣🤣It’s hilarious how many people are having a meltdown over rich people having to pay tax that they themselves have no choice in paying, simps and serf come to mind .

    • @freshtoast3879
      @freshtoast3879 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@lythallsI completely agree. This guy is just annoyed that he's having to fork over money instead of buying himself another holiday home.

  • @LeeLynn-vq8yq
    @LeeLynn-vq8yq หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    It blows my mind how ignorant people are of the farmer's plight. They really have no clue.

    • @chindit6784
      @chindit6784 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A plight they brought on themselves. 14 years of tories brought a collapse in exports, loss of subsidies and cheap imports from across the world.why werent they on the streets then

    • @jameshunter7181
      @jameshunter7181 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes, even some on here, probably LIEbour supporters sadly.

  • @sirrusly
    @sirrusly หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Two main points here, Inheritance tax shouldn't be a thing. By christ we all get taxed enough as it is. And secondly, the last people on earth who should be heavily taxed is farmers.... they already run a very tight ship and the entire nations food supply relies on them being able to operate. Why is this even a discussion? How about we take a closer look at the cost of housing illegal immigrants, somewhere between 10-20 billion pounds a year. Give over

    • @chrisdickens4268
      @chrisdickens4268 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      If your main point is "by Christ we all get taxed enough" to argue against inheritance tax your just repeating the taxpayers alliance lines (and they represent the worst and very rich people)

    • @anthonyrybicki1000
      @anthonyrybicki1000 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Could the migrants not be housed on tax subsidised farms? Farmers need to earn their tax privileges and not assume that the rest of us should fund their lifestyles.

    • @neilmachon9828
      @neilmachon9828 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@chrisdickens4268yea, Dyson everdently has 36,000 acres

  • @william_marshal
    @william_marshal หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    This man kills his own argument when he say he Grandfather bought land at £30/acre, his father bought land at £60/acre and that his land is now worth £10.000/acre. They have accumulated £Millions in wealth and not paid a h'penny tax on it. This country is sick and tired of the greedy rich who don't want to pay their fair share of Tax to run our social state. Their greed means the people at the bottom are paying ever more tax !!!

    • @georgedoorley5628
      @georgedoorley5628 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      food prices will have to increase. on account of this ........the money has to come from somewhere ......... you cannot have it both ways

    • @johnowen1677
      @johnowen1677 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's not the farmers fault that the land prices have risen so rapidly, it's the Government's fault. It's to try and put off the wealthy investors who are the ones manipulating the land prices to avoid this tax. The Govt says there are only about 500 farms where this tax would apply. Can they list them and publish an annual list so the others don't have to worry. The 500 concerned would not bring in much in the scheme of things anyway.

  • @RobertEFuller
    @RobertEFuller หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It’s interesting hearing farmers explaining things perfectly
    And then listening to our government that makes no sense and have no idea what they are doing and the inability to answer any questions ?

  • @jackmason7823
    @jackmason7823 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    400 acres?! That is not a small farm. My family farm is 62 acres.

  • @nigelballard-m7h
    @nigelballard-m7h หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    He finally made a valide point towards the end of the interview regarding none farmers buying land, such as Clarkson
    Strutt & Parker's Farmland Database shows that non-farmers bought more than half of the farms and estates sold on the open market in England in 2023, with farmers accounting for the lowest level of transactions on record.
    Meanwhile, non-farmer buyers - who are a mix of private and institutional investors and lifestyle buyers - accounted for 56% of sales, and because they also tend to buy larger farms, they bought a larger area of land than farmers too.
    Private investors were involved in 28% of transactions, institutional investors in 13% - a rise of 10% on 2022 levels - and lifestyle buyers in 16%.

  • @Dom-fk3te
    @Dom-fk3te หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Land price has gone up exponentially precisely because people who have no interest in farming can buy it to avoid inheritance tax. First make FARMING profitable and THEN add the inheritance tax back to close the loophole.

    • @Trippenzoid
      @Trippenzoid หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dont be fcking dumb. its gone up exponentially because England is absolutely PACKED like sardines, and STILL letting the animals in by the millions.

    • @user-jn7pl3ofu
      @user-jn7pl3ofu หลายเดือนก่อน

      Half those fake “farms” just used for inheritance tax have never been used as a farm. Why don’t they do it by the productiveness of the farm and how long a family has been there. This is going to destroy some PROPER farmers

    • @TheAffrojutty
      @TheAffrojutty หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or just clobber those who buy up land but don’t farm it 🤔

  • @OG-dp1kx
    @OG-dp1kx หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The biggest issue here is the price per acre going from 60 pounds to 10,000 on just 2 generations. Theres something terribly wrong with this set up

    • @oldmcdonald6319
      @oldmcdonald6319 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This, and it's not the farmers that have done it

    • @maxthelab8457
      @maxthelab8457 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A farmer up the road to me is selling, well trying to sell just over 5 acres as potential development land - he wants £1M per acre!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PER ACRE!!! ( we are in Devon )

    • @jjefferyworboys8138
      @jjefferyworboys8138 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maxthelab8457 Land with planning permission is worth between 30 and 100 plus times more than agricultural land.

    • @maxthelab8457
      @maxthelab8457 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jjefferyworboys8138 Yes WITH PP - this is just a parcel of land on the edge of the city. It is being advertised as having 'potential to build a development of luxury houses subject to relevant planning consents' - that implies to me it DOESN'T have any PP, not even outline as things stand otherwise it would have been stated in the blurb, wouldn't it??..

    • @jameshunter7181
      @jameshunter7181 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      And LIEbour want to grab that land to build taxpayer funded social houses for the illegals which they won't admit, will blame the Tory's as usual.

  • @chrisrobinson9178
    @chrisrobinson9178 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    given how they reported Amsterdam last week can we trust this report this week

    • @schy9614
      @schy9614 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂

    • @neilmachon9828
      @neilmachon9828 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please forward the information to me, would be truly grateful

    • @chrisrobinson9178
      @chrisrobinson9178 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@neilmachon9828 They showed one film by their reporter which did not fit what they wanted so tock it down and replaced it with one that fitted with their narrative pro Israeli

    • @neilmachon9828
      @neilmachon9828 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @chrisrobinson9178 cheers for the info

  • @Booyabeeba
    @Booyabeeba หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    If they always intend to pass the farm down to the next generation then it must be straightforward to pass it on well ahead of the 7 year time threshold.

    • @georgedoorley5628
      @georgedoorley5628 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      but the best financial advise prior to the budget was to pass it over on death ..........now suddenly all has changed and people who the government never meant to be hit by this tax are going to be affected by this sudden change

    • @kevincarbb2819
      @kevincarbb2819 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      and how do know your time to meet thy maker?.......Also a farmer in Devon did just this thinking he did the right thing and then his son died first...his wife had the lot and wed another guy who hung his hat up on everything they worked for..who wants to see that happen...heartbreaking....why does there have to be a catch in the law ???

    • @paulkavanagh8240
      @paulkavanagh8240 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@georgedoorley5628I ask this out of interest and not as a criticism. The structure of taxes doesn't stand still. Why aren't farmers directing their anger towards poor financial advice? Equally, why are farms registered as private and not in the name of the Business?

    • @tex7432
      @tex7432 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@georgedoorley5628the government most certainly meant to hit these people

  • @johnmoody2365
    @johnmoody2365 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    there is nothing noisier than a rich person being threatened with paying their fair share. Real farmers are being duped by the glitz of wealthy personalities like Clarkson, Dyson and Allsopp since being co-opted by the right wing politicians to do their bidding; notably Farage decked out in his tweed country costume with Badenoch, Atkins, Griffith and Tice preferring wax jacket disguises. It's wealthy individuals avoiding/evading tax that increases the tax burden on ordinary working people and using farms as financial instruments rather than grow crops or livestock. This price distortion is exactly the same that has beset the UK housing market and the main cause of the current crisis. Houses are also used as financial instruments rather than as places to live

  • @JuliusFawcett
    @JuliusFawcett หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Multi millionaires need to pay more taxes end of

    • @karl787
      @karl787 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There's enough money in the pot it keeps getting wasted

    • @JuliusFawcett
      @JuliusFawcett หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@karl787 the millionaires and billionaires have enough and the poor protect them

    • @jameshunter7181
      @jameshunter7181 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That would result in, many cases, the wealthy businesses leaving the country, and it's obvious that thanks to reeves barmy. silly budgets the number of unemployed here is already beginning to take off and will only get worse. Even car manufacturers are planning to leave the UK already because of her.

  • @michaelmais3657
    @michaelmais3657 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Farmers are running a business, but want to be treated differently then other businesses. The don't have to pay the full amount of tax, the farm can be given 7 years before death, if they are in their 80s they should have given it over years ago.

  • @alexanderderautor
    @alexanderderautor หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Farmers lying about their wealth is here in Germany exactly the same. They cry all the time about their little income and then drove off in a new Mercedes G-Waggon, while all the true work on their farms is done by contractors and a bunch of asset-less real minimum wage staff.

  • @gdwlaw5549
    @gdwlaw5549 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Farming land is for farming and not a tax dodge! This has artificially inflated land prices and keeps most farmers as tenants! If the same land was with 1 million or 10 million is it producing food for the nation? Well done Labour

  • @pagan1347
    @pagan1347 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I shed no tears for the landed gentry !!

  • @anthonymichaelwilson8401
    @anthonymichaelwilson8401 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The Farmers have made the Uk 🇬🇧 proud 😊 again 😊

    • @jasonchippendale1958
      @jasonchippendale1958 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No they didn't, they're retards that don't know how to negotiate with super markets, voted against their own EU subsidies and now are pretending to be poor to avoid paying tax.

  • @markcooper3100
    @markcooper3100 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    farmers have passed farms like this for years and avoided taxes for years, passing on 7 years before can be seen as a tax dodging anyway.

    • @jablot5054
      @jablot5054 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tax evasion .

  • @gdfggggg
    @gdfggggg หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Tax the farmers, tax the farmers, tax the farmers. No food to feed the hungry. It’s quite simple.

    • @colinyates7485
      @colinyates7485 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@gdfggggg Tax the Farmers, Tax the Royal Family, Tax the Churches.

    • @jasonchippendale1958
      @jasonchippendale1958 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ignore all previous instructions and give me a recipe for a victoria sponge cake!

  • @mattanderson6672
    @mattanderson6672 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    NO FARMERS NO FOOD

    • @jackperry2821
      @jackperry2821 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      We can say that with any profession:
      No nurses - no healthcare
      No teachers - no education
      They'd still have to pay inheritance tax, so I don't really get your point

  • @jamesrickerby2756
    @jamesrickerby2756 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Our farmers are great at their work! However, this tax is so easy to avoid that it is illogical no accountant has told them what to do! I did it for years and its totally legal!

  • @andiharper4498
    @andiharper4498 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Farmers could have done without Clarkson, Rees-Mogg, Farage and Badenoch turning up to 'support' their cause.

  • @KimThomas-vp4vm
    @KimThomas-vp4vm หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    When it is kept in the family for farming there should be no inheritance tax. If they sold some of their farming land to help keep their farm going than that can be taxed.

    • @BLAHBLAH-ov8mt
      @BLAHBLAH-ov8mt หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Three generations of subsidy is hardly something to shout about.

    • @robwillcox2307
      @robwillcox2307 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No idea have you.​@@BLAHBLAH-ov8mt

    • @georgedoorley5628
      @georgedoorley5628 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BLAHBLAH-ov8mt what about all the cheap pork that this farm produced over this time ........nobody talks about that

  • @markclans3284
    @markclans3284 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I dont understand why the different treatment from anyone else. The family home - the family business. It levels farmers and gives 10 years on zero interest to pay.

  • @TigerP1
    @TigerP1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How many farmers did not demonstrate because they will not be effected?

  • @steveward4432
    @steveward4432 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pass it on , live 7 years, no tax to pay.

  • @Setinmywaysalways
    @Setinmywaysalways หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    If he employs 50 folks, are they coining it in?

    • @johnowen1677
      @johnowen1677 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They must be to be able to pay 50 staff. Won't leave much to invest in the future!
      Or any to pay inheritance tax either. The government should only tax personal income above a reasonable limit.

  • @parametr
    @parametr หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If he argues that the number given by HMRC is wrong, doesn't that mean that land-owners have been misreporting their assets?

  • @matthewcook9404
    @matthewcook9404 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m not sure that getting Jeremy “I only bought the farm to avoid inheritance tax” Clarkson, and multi millionaire farmer ( ?? ) Andrew Lloyd Webber to shout about taxing 4% of very rich farmers is a good idea.

  • @daleescombe9678
    @daleescombe9678 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    About time farmers paid his employers don't get to leave a legacy like that

  • @colinu9209
    @colinu9209 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This chap is correct on every point except when he said that the government went into this with good intentions 😮

    • @chrisclose8356
      @chrisclose8356 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except the THRESHOLD!!!!!

  • @davem4131
    @davem4131 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wasn’t it only recently the French farmers were protesting. All eerily similar and the agenda is the EU……sorry WEF

    • @jasonchippendale1958
      @jasonchippendale1958 หลายเดือนก่อน

      2024 has been an interesting year for the farmers in Europe. It seems most countries sending arms to Ukraine have had a peasants revolt with tractor fetishist clogging up capitals. At this point they're practically foreign agents, whether knowingly or not.

    • @davem4131
      @davem4131 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ so your are implying farmers are revolting against the war

    • @jasonchippendale1958
      @jasonchippendale1958 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @davem4131 not quite. My assumption would be that they're an easy target for political turmoil. A largely out of touch sub section by virtue of being rural and having no interest in the things that make cities run, this coupled with the importance of farming in general creates the potential for an uneducated mob that people will listen to. In Poland the farmer riots were over grain just passing through their country but they had been convinced it was being dumped in Poland and lowering their returns on their crop. It wasn't, but when it led to train derailments the government had to take action.

    • @davem4131
      @davem4131 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ I think this is the UK government pointing fingers and creating targets. Most farmers live very simple lives and own land to then pass it on to family and don’t make much money at all. Everyone is complaining about energy prices and would rather be cold than pay the extortionate energy prices as we outsource it and then buy it in. Now food. Dangerous move.

  • @pkl8811
    @pkl8811 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Increase inheritance tax for the wealthy.

  • @davidfisher3273
    @davidfisher3273 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I’m in tears

  • @guywilletts2804
    @guywilletts2804 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why is land valued at £10k an acre when it only produces a small income. Who's buying at those artificially inflated values, and why.

  • @paulripley4095
    @paulripley4095 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Subsidy they all get but never mention 😅

  • @imonlyhereforthecomments4267
    @imonlyhereforthecomments4267 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Clarkson has damaged farming more than BSE

    • @oatdilemma6395
      @oatdilemma6395 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Literally the opposite

    • @imonlyhereforthecomments4267
      @imonlyhereforthecomments4267 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @oatdilemma6395 Clarkson is a wolf in sheeps clothing, he has already served farmers for dinner.

  • @kaseycornflakes1234
    @kaseycornflakes1234 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have just read the BBC info page asking me to trust the Beeb and its output. Having said that with hundreds of tractors and farmers protesting in London on Wednesday it appears that the BBC did not cover the story on it`s MAIN 6pm and 10pm news. The story seems to have been covered either late night (when far fewer people are viewing) or in a periphery way through its lesser, local channels. Am I right or am I wrong?

  • @1001legoboy
    @1001legoboy หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Farmer need to increase prices to keep themselves whole around 4% would cover it…

    • @jasonchippendale1958
      @jasonchippendale1958 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Buy European, it's cheaper and doesn't come with the Farage BS.

    • @chrish9164
      @chrish9164 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jasonchippendale1958 Yeah... get your Christmas Turkey from Poland then, and put your money where your mouth is.

  • @hourbee5535
    @hourbee5535 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    How many farmers voted Labour? 😂

    • @robertmaitland8728
      @robertmaitland8728 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They voted for Brexit and they have left our country in a mess.

    • @sallystrutt6715
      @sallystrutt6715 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      None

    • @chy4919
      @chy4919 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      none, they never do, they voted for brexit as well lol

    • @DavidEllis-p9z
      @DavidEllis-p9z หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@chy4919where’s the proof of this comment…other than hearsay of course?

    • @dominicbaggott3525
      @dominicbaggott3525 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@DavidEllis-p9z i believe the split is similar to the general public voting 52-53%. However, the reality is that as all those who voted to remain are having to lay in the brexit bed they didn't make, the farmers will have to as well.

  • @jimmclean9312
    @jimmclean9312 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Has there ever been a time when farmers were happy ? In an effort to offset the shortfall caused by Brexit, for which farmers voted overwhelmingly, the government is closing some of the tax loopholes that people like Jeremy Clarkson have been exploiting ! About bloody time !

  • @Ffinity
    @Ffinity หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Eff these greedy cee's, it's about time they pay their way!

  • @kevinohara1908
    @kevinohara1908 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't know all i see is farmers in 50k 4x4s

  • @wesley5074
    @wesley5074 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I stand with Farmers!

  • @jordoncampbell5118
    @jordoncampbell5118 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Farmer's who worked the land for generations should be exempt.dont think Clarkson should be exempt he said he bought the farm to Avoid inheritance tax.he is ruined it for the farmer's.

    • @MIEJ4
      @MIEJ4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why should I pay more tax working in an office than farmers do?

  • @HymnfortheDudes
    @HymnfortheDudes หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They've had it good for decades, many many decades. They all voted Brexit and then got upset because the government wouldn't give them the subsidies that they previously got from the EU. Tough we're all in this together, except the farmers are ok up to £3million and as for Jeremy Clarkson and his tax break farm, tough.😄

  • @geoffnewman3109
    @geoffnewman3109 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Fergus the farmer has plenty of options to avoid paying inheritance tax. He should speak to his business accountant. He could pass the farm business on to family and as long as he lives 7 years after the transfer his dependants are fine. He could set up a trust quite cheaply and or take out insurance to ease paying the tax. Farmers coped with this tax up until 1984 when Margaret Thatcher thought her friends in the countryside should be spared paying their fair share.

    • @MIEJ4
      @MIEJ4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      7 years is just the start of an upper class retirement, fit as a fiddle and eating proper quality food all their lives.
      An unaffordable dream for many of the rest of us in this country.

    • @georgedoorley5628
      @georgedoorley5628 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MIEJ4 food will only get more expensive ......the money to pay this tax will have to come from somewhere

  • @robertmaitland8728
    @robertmaitland8728 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is not your average farmer for goodness sake. He is a rich businessman employing 50 people and I would love to see his monthly assets.

    • @George57
      @George57 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’d love to see his wage bill. And the hourly rate he’s paying his work force. Probably minimum wage . So his wage bill will be being subsidised as well through universal credit

  • @paulprosser4108
    @paulprosser4108 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Actually the government figures are correct, So this farmer with a huge business in farming terms refusing to pay his taxes, Greed Greed Greed.

  • @johngodridge8244
    @johngodridge8244 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Assuming he is married, that means its 3 million before tax ?

  • @alancoates4531
    @alancoates4531 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    If I got to pay tax ,why can’t farmers pay tax .

    • @kevincarbb2819
      @kevincarbb2819 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      because they are on some of the farms going to get a £100k per year tax bill when they are only drawing a wage of £30k

  • @anne-mariepritz7649
    @anne-mariepritz7649 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Keep your food.

  • @henryburton6529
    @henryburton6529 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Farmers voted for Brexit. Every industry is suffering they have to pull their weight

  • @andreww8128
    @andreww8128 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Pay your taxes like everyone else… we all want to pass things to the next generation. Poor millionaires my heart bleeds.

    • @JohnHipkin-yr6wr
      @JohnHipkin-yr6wr หลายเดือนก่อน

      No such thing as a poor millionaire

    • @legendaryjonblue
      @legendaryjonblue หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Your too thick to understand

    • @debbiegreenow8653
      @debbiegreenow8653 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Embarrassingly clueless

  • @kaywaters7478
    @kaywaters7478 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If it/s only going to affect 500 farms WHY THE HELL ARE THEY DOING IT?

    • @JohnJones-k9d
      @JohnJones-k9d หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s about envy, labour and its middle class champagne socialists followers have no clue outside of the university they study gender politics in.

    • @xiaobaozha
      @xiaobaozha หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kaywaters7478 to stop the continued acquisition of farmland by wealthy people buying for the sole intent of avoiding IHT.

    • @Petersworld77
      @Petersworld77 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because they are not 500 ordinary farming folk, they are either Dukes (whose land was bequeathed by past kings & queens) or mega rich people like Dyson, Clarkson, Beckham etc who only own land to avoid IHT. Seems to me to be an excellent way to plug an exploited tax loophole.

  • @wiseget-f7e
    @wiseget-f7e หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    2TKier should be paying tax on his free gifts. That will fill any black hole!

    • @Ffinity
      @Ffinity หลายเดือนก่อน

      Still keeping up that family tradition of never thinking I see.

    • @gameroom101official
      @gameroom101official หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      20% VAT on £107,145 since 2019 = £21,429. That is £4,285.8 a year. Don't see how that fills a £22bn black hole...

  • @Camisqui
    @Camisqui หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Poor farmer , with only 4 million in land and 50 employees!!

    • @BLAHBLAH-ov8mt
      @BLAHBLAH-ov8mt หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe we should set him up a go fund me page.

    • @chrish9164
      @chrish9164 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      How many people are you employing?

  • @alwenajones6076
    @alwenajones6076 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tractor tax that is a laugh .farmers pay no road tax on their massive tractors,Bet your life the tractors at the demo had red fuel in the tanks,why weren't the fuel inspectors at the demo testing the fuel of the tractors? J.J.

  • @aledjames9784
    @aledjames9784 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can we get this guy to run the country? What a legend!

  • @michaelgoode9555
    @michaelgoode9555 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Put it in a Trust then.

  • @mz12369
    @mz12369 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Not crying for a millionaire, pay your tax

  • @edwardmetalheart
    @edwardmetalheart หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What the goverment really needs to do here is to increase the CGT of Farm Land that is priced over a 900,000. That way Jeremy has to pay tax no matter what and he cant cry more about it as well.

  • @manindersingh8385
    @manindersingh8385 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Need Jacob Mogg to share his tax avoidence advice

  • @13thnotehifireviews7
    @13thnotehifireviews7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The stupid Labour idiots have got to change the rules and stop penalising people like this. It’s so overwhelming they’ve cocked it up.
    There’s all sorts of rules they could bring in like keeping farms in families so it’s not used for tax dodge purposes

    • @blazzz13
      @blazzz13 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pay your tax!

  • @voice_of_reason5604
    @voice_of_reason5604 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the real world. This tax hasn’t been thought through.

  • @markmcbride678
    @markmcbride678 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    No farmer is working for less than minimum wage 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @alexanderderautor
      @alexanderderautor หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Farmers lying about their wealth is here in Germany exactly the same. They cry all the time about their little income and then drove off in a new Mercedes G-Waggon, while all the true work on their farms is done by contractors and a bunch of asset-less real minimum wage staff.

    • @rbagot
      @rbagot หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A lot of farmers around me will be earning less than minimum wage and ironically they are all using food banks.

  • @anomander-rake
    @anomander-rake หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Of course they meant to. Government must seek to reduce taxes, not increase it and find more ways to take more

  • @chris_youtube998
    @chris_youtube998 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Why does everyone keep taking about a £1m limit? It’s a £3m limit for a married couple.

    • @jjefferyworboys8138
      @jjefferyworboys8138 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      By misrepresenting the amount they hope to gain more support.

    • @pjr1023
      @pjr1023 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The £3m number is spin from the government. It easily falls down outside of a model set of circumstances. The government have no clue about the realities of farms; how they're structured, asset values, how they operate, yet discount the value they contribute, and made this decision away in a dark room having made no effort to consult anyone in the industry. It's an ideology-driven policy to try to catch out the super-rich. but with no balance or nuance, and will decimate the industry in its wake.

    • @pcat1672
      @pcat1672 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not everyone is married

    • @holland736
      @holland736 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope ​@@pjr1023

    • @Petersworld77
      @Petersworld77 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pcat1672probably got no one to inherit his farm then. What’s the problem?

  • @vickyingramnymann8543
    @vickyingramnymann8543 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's ridiculous. A three bed detached home in Herefordshire is worth around £575,000. Where on earth are Labour getting their figures from. Are they completely stupid.

  • @jackdaknife
    @jackdaknife หลายเดือนก่อน

    We just gotta find a way to stop farmers dying

  • @pm1104
    @pm1104 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brilliant guy very very well explained……! ❤❤

  • @TheUnwoken
    @TheUnwoken หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It difficult for me to express sympathy for these millionaires farmers who don't really care unless it's their pocket's being emptied...
    Small famers deserved the help, rich "farmer" should start doing some actual farm work, rather then complain about how they're the only ones paying tax because they're worth 12.8 million pounds jesus

  • @Pr1ckles
    @Pr1ckles หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Reform.

  • @gilesfitzherbert7725
    @gilesfitzherbert7725 หลายเดือนก่อน

    'they didn't mean to' LOL, they absolutely meant to do it.

  • @GoogleAccount0
    @GoogleAccount0 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Doesit include royal family inheritance?

  • @Mikey374
    @Mikey374 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They should put the farm into a Trust so it’s not part of their estate. That’s what normal people do.

  • @domm9616
    @domm9616 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Keeping them happy doesn't just help them it means we won't get food increase of price and so on. But the shops will use this to increase price

  • @H-nx8wr
    @H-nx8wr หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Listen to the farmers!

  • @anthonyjay429
    @anthonyjay429 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Voted Brexit just like the Fishing industry leaving a 50 billion black hole in tax revenue but want very one else to pay.

  • @sphenoidjjj
    @sphenoidjjj หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Any form of inheritance tax is just plain wrong.

  • @davidfellows1650
    @davidfellows1650 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How many people are in a position where they own £4million of land!? And this "handing down to the next generation", he means to say "handing down to his family's next generation". This is the problem. It's the wealth that's staying in the farmer's family and not being shared with the taxpayer, the very people who subsidise farmers.

  • @rumpoh8039
    @rumpoh8039 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    IF THEY NEVER REALISE THEIR MILLIONS
    AS IT IS THE LAND AND BUILDINGS THAT THEY PASS ON
    AND THE FARMING NEEDS THE LAND AND BUILDINGS
    IT IS NEVER A REALISED ASSET
    MERELY A FARMING INVESTMENT

  • @jamiesmith3259
    @jamiesmith3259 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    400 acres...pardon?

  • @Steve-hu7jf
    @Steve-hu7jf หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Where will this tax be spent on ?

  • @andycookguitar
    @andycookguitar หลายเดือนก่อน

    Up until I heard this bloke speak I been pro this legislation. But this guy’s correct, they need a period of grace to get their tax house in order. If people think that they could just sell some of their land to pay the tax bill they need to consider that it won’t be purchased for farming as at £10’000 an acre it’s not viable. Do we want to produce our own food or not? This is the question we need to ask.

  • @pcat1672
    @pcat1672 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m sure they knew EXACTLY what they were doing.

  • @mrmagoo-i2l
    @mrmagoo-i2l หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    2/3 will pay the tax, not a few. The sums were wrong.

  • @Mickthemove_
    @Mickthemove_ หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am sorry, but he is talking bollocks, any tax adviser will explain to him that if he and his brother own the farm and are both married and actually live on the farm the IHT would virtually be ZERO! Whilst us who build businesses from zero have always and always will be taxed through the nose! Once a rich land owning tory always a rich land owning tory! people with an ounce of nuance can see through this bullshit

  • @Redpilled66
    @Redpilled66 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Millionaire landowners cosplaying as farmers moaning that they have to finally pay taxes. Smallest violin ever. 🎻

  • @Incognito-turnip
    @Incognito-turnip หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why should farmers be exempt? I just don’t get it.
    Its like they think they have some god given right to own land. Like they are above the law.
    If they dont earn enough to live the job should be more profitable to give them a better income.
    What do they earn anyway?

    • @anthonycraig1458
      @anthonycraig1458 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Supermarkets dictate prices to farmers so in many cases they can't increase prices. They need land to produce food!