Two seconds is a whole 2000 milliseconds. One can say yes is less that one, if you're fast enough. Or if you want to be fancy as add a fuck in the front.
it’s particularly annoying on here because exploiting a false DMCA claim to censor criticism has been around since early yt; while at the same time yt has been shown recently to use uploads to train AI without notifying users
@@TheRogueCommand I think they're more scared of his 5head. If you measure from the top of his hairline down to the eyebrow, its the same distance as from his eyebrow down to his mouth. That's terrifying. I feel like he could psychically attack me with his massive ego through the screen. It's also funny because the prefrontal cortex often has functions related to egotism and narcissistic behaviour, so it's actually a physiological indicator of egotism to have a huge forehead
@@amelioravictoriadionyssia3323 i would like to inform you you are not actually making a valid point by playing on his appearance, also do you have a source for the argument about the forehead and ego claim?
Yeah and it’s not even a movie the only actor in that film was Matt Walsh. All the other people had to do was talk and share their opinions ☠️. And it was entertaining. And WILD.
Borat is a character based in Kazakhstani, that is a central Asian country, it's racist to assume his character as middle eastern because of his physical attributes. Shame on you.
Shame on the people that Borat interviewed, because a lot of them assumed that he was middle-eastern. Which, you know, what exactly what Sacha Baron Cohen was counting on.
I don't remember what it's supposed to be, other than "post-Soviet" and of course "Kazakh". I think SBC chose that country for Borat exactly because Westerners know so little about it.
It's a great movie that exposes the DEI grifters for exactly what they are. Plus, it carries a rather wholesome message to counter them: Don't focus on race, focus on being a good human being and treating others well!
Well, what IS a woman? Would you consider two people disparaging a group of other people based solely on their race being different, would you call that racism?
My thoughts: I didn't watch the film. From what I have heard audiences laughed a lot and enjoyed it as a comedy. Others appear to take it as the negative side of the 'anti-racist community' as a whole. Matt Walsh also got interviewed on CNN about the film so some people did show interest in the film from the mainstream media.
So Matt Walsh's big new idea is just "We have Borat at home." If I had expectations for the Daily Wire, I would be dissapointed. I mean, come on. Jessie putting Sisko in the background was probably more racially sensitive than anything the Daily Wire could come up with.
He’s meant to wear a cheap wig to make fun of you leftist snowflakes who put boobs on men’s bodies.. he’s showing how fake extras don’t make you something else. Wig = sarcasm on dummies
I think that's the thing, he thinks he doesn't NEED a second wig. I think he thinks he doesn't need one AND that it's an epic iconic costume just like Borat that is universally beloved by all audiences.
"No one ever reviews my very good movie!" *Jessie Gender, Dead Domain, and Some More News BARGE into the chat, followed by half of leftTube* Seriously though, that epic 4-hour evisceration deserves a rewatch or fifteen. My 72yo trans parent loved it, too! 💛
Seriously, this is, like, the third review I’ve watched of this movie that “critics are afraid to review.” I’ve seen more reviews of this movie than Deadpool and Wolverine.
@@briham86im pretty sure he means from Mainstream film critics & major networks or show. We all know Mainstream media only pushes far left narrative on racism, sexism, etc and doesnt allow any objection to their false narrative
@@briham86 Are you really suggesting it's about what you, a single person has watched and not about the lack of reviews on Rotten Tomatoes while the movie was in the top 5 most viewed?
I assumed that was a bit of a joke given the asterisk and the fact that Walsh is an extremely biased "documentarian" anyway. Also, did you watch the video? Jesse did her best to focus on the film alone and not get into the rest of the Daily Wire's rubbish. Like, she could have pointed out that Walsh is cosplaying as that teacher character from Mr. Birchum and acting like that wacko caricature is a real person that exists. She did not, because this is a simple review about why the film is unappealing solely in context with itself. So, she's doing her best to be unbiased, but we should all know that "true objectivism" is not possible. We're humans with past experiences that inevitably give us biases. So long as we are aware of them and how they color our opinions and analysis, it's okay. That's just how being human works.
I caught that as well... but I think it was intentional, to add a little to his/hers/whoever's notion that it thinks Matt actually is a racist. Throwing the "a" in there points the finger a little more directly... if that makes sense.
@@Amazonian11 Well, given that this is coming from a member of a community that is extremely sensitive about deadnaming and using the wrong pronouns, it's a little rich to consistently use the wrong name for the film.... And if it's done intentionally then it's also hypocritical.
"The critics aren't reviewing it because it's too good. Sounds like some grade A hardcore cope." There has never been a movie so good that critics won't review it. There has never been more cope than this denial.
Truth is, Jeremy Jahns gave what is in my opinion a real unbiased review of the film. It’s hard to imagine this review as unbiased when you say, in response to Walsh manipulating a race grifter to give $30 to a black person as reparations, that it’s ignoring the wider context of how reparations is a step toward building solutions to racism in this country. It’s not trying to build a context for this, it’s trying to make fun of a race grifter. Borat didn’t meet with a bunch of Trump supporters to try mend the divisiveness of the country through ideals, or even set the tone or basis for that, he just wanted to mock their idiocy. Another commenter said it best; is your criticism that Walsh didn’t take these race grifters seriously enough? Imagine a conservative reviewing Borat and saying “Borat was insincere when he spoke with the Trump supporters, and didn’t address the key issues that Trump supporters have; rather he just found the stupidest ones and mocked them by giving them an open mic.” That conservative would be correct, but woefully ignorant to the idea of what constitutes a satirical comedy. A stark difference between the two is that the Trump supporters Borat made fun of were in positions of low-information ideologues, while the race grifters Walsh made fun of were in positions of power.
Ah yes, Walsh manipulated DiAngelo by insisting and insisting until he made everyone in the room uncomfortable - including Walsh's black colleague. Eventually DiAngelo had to ask the guy if he was okay with getting 30$ just to make Walsh stop. Wow, so revealing. Such idiocy. I'm impressed - did I mention how impressed I am?
@@dariocarraresi1823 How do you know Walsh's colleague was uncomfortable? He seemed pretty down with it. As a producer on the film, he is in on the joke. Or maybe you prefer to do black folks' thinking for them? Do you want to inform him that he was uncomfortable? Because he didn't seem to know it.
@@therovinghome6390 The scene was edited in a pretty weird way to obfuscate things, however DiAngelo released a statement explaining what really happened during that scene. Among other things, DiAngelo outright told Walsh that his idea of "reparations" was weird (this part was kept in the movie) because it's about the government addressing a systemic issue caused by its own segregation policies, not about individual white people paying individual black people (this part was cut out). DiAngelo also pointed out that Walsh kept making everyone uncomfortable. When Walsh read the statement during an interview, his only objection was about DiAngelo's comment on Walsh's wig; for everything else, he had no objection to DiAngelo's version.
@@dariocarraresi1823 I read her statement. You definitely did not watch the movie, or you would not have quoted her condescending take (which is generally how she treats people of color) on the producer’s response.
@@Tejroe how can you think anyone in this video other than Matt Walsh has power? Like the guy's a prick but painting him as some kind of underdog is just blatantly facetious
It's funny because DiAngelo kept trying to explain to Walsh that reparations don't work that way, but he didn't listen. He kept insisting and insisting until she gave up because he was making everyone - including the black guy she gave the money to - uncomfortable. It's hilarious how Walsh thought that being a little whiny femaledog was a "gotcha".
the guy had the audacity to condemn people for taking sick days, meanwhile his billionaire sugar daddy pays for him to fly around doing this crap and calling it "work"
I don’t like Walsh at all, I laughed my ass off. The people he interviewed are absolutely nuts. All you really have to do is let them talk and the movie makes itself.
You didn't watch the review. And you probably believe more of Walsh's claims like "Kinsey molested infants" or "they are using chemical castration drugs on trans kids".
@@Cruzeoc101 The point I'm making is Matt Walsh and his team in charge of editing means they can decide what footage goes and what doesn't so it's easy to make the interviewed people look "crazy"
what about the fact that you had to go through surgery to pretend to be a woman, and you're not even close to ever being one, you'll remain a sad little man
The amount of bias in this review was awful. Sucks that you spent the first 5 minutes bashing the author of the film and then continued doing so after stating you’d try to be objective. This was a horrible review and gave no real depth beyond “I don’t like Matt Walsh”.
I first saw a poster for this when I was browsing for something coming up at my local Regals. I didn't recognize him at first because he wasn't the head of a grown-ass man on the body of a diapered infant.
I'm a long-haired guy who's more progressive than Matt could understand (not a difficult bar to clear), but from my experience, I don't get how his wig makes for a liberal stereotype. They did the same in Mr. Birchum, I think it's something about "hipsters" from 15 years ago?
My review: She's actually quite awful. She heart-reacts all the oh-so-clever comments about how the movie could be two seconds long. Not exactly the reactions of someone who reviewed the film in good faith or fairness, is it? Ah, fuck it. You'll all ignore that and move on to singing her praises. Why do I bother?
@@Ultranothinguhm, you do see the video you’re replying to, no? How can you say she’s not reviewing in good faith while quite literally commenting on a good faith video review lol not to mention the 4hr video she made critiquing What Is A Woman…if only the DW didn’t sensor everything criticizing them. Not very free speech of them
@@karahampton1285 well, imagine that a four hour review of a movie that's an hour and a half long contains enough copywritten material that a person could feasibly reduce said review down to a point where they no longer have to buy a ticket to said film. The answer is right there in your own comment, dude. But no, this wasn't a video made in good faith. It's completely one-sided and biased, and the SOUL of the review is in the reviewer's CLEAR presumptions and established feelings toward the filmmaker, his politics, etc. The worst part is that I know you know it's actually true. It's too obviously true that any person who arises in the morning of their own volition and can feed and clothe themselves can plainly glean the truth of it. We ALL know that this person didn't like the film before they even saw it, and created the review to fit. Can we all start being honest with each other? Please?
Oh God I can't escape this damn movie ad. I love you, Jessie, but I'm watching this one on mute, I can't deal with another second of Matt Walsh's voice. (And the answer is yes, you are, Matt)
I think people playing clips of him should speed the clip up, not for copyright reasons but so his voice sounds less annoying. And that's coming from someone who doesn't like it when clips in videos are at X2 speed.
@@Syv_ you argue like mac from always sunny The fact that Matt Walsh admitted to going into these interviews with intent to make the people look dumb while also going under false pretenses and having final say how the source footage gets edited is unethical and proof of bad faith. The fact that I don't trust a man who has obvious bad faith and a history of editing footage to make himself look better like he did in the previous film isn't bad faith. It's healthy skepticism.
No, the point is that he takes grifters too seriously. He’s taking a parasitic industry that grew off of racial justice movements and presenting it as the racial justice movements.
The difference between Borat and Matt Walsh is that Borat asks ridiculous questions to normal people. Matt Walsh asks normal questions to ridiculous people.
@@dariocarraresi1823 I doubt you watched the movie. Specifically, what was edited to take something out of context ? When Robin Diangelo paid reparations, how was that edited to make her look bad ?
@@toneloc7910 First of all, the entire interiew before the "pay reparations" bits is edited to the point of making DiAngelo sound incoherent and incomprehensible. Then there's the part about reparations. Here's what was cut out from that part: >Walsh repeatedly insisting, over and over, that DiAngelo should give money to Walsh's black colleague. It got to the point that he was making everyone uncomfortable. >DiAngelo pointing out, multiple times, that reparations don't work that way. >DiAngelo saying that she isn't an expert on reparations, and suggesting various other academics and sources that Walsh could consult. >DiAngelo asking the black guy if he was okay with receiving money (because she genuinely thought that Walsh prepared the whole "reparations" stunt without asking the guy first).
@@dariocarraresi1823 She IS incoherent and incomprehensible. She isn't an expert on reparations ? That is laughable. Progressives are calling for them all the time. If she didn't want to pay reparations, she didn't have to.
@@giantfriendcrab6571 Yeah, the guy who defended white supremacist and terrorist-defending group VDARE as just having "unfashionable views" is totally not racist. Nothing racist about pushing a conspiracy theory that Jews are deliberately forcing illegal immigration of non-Whites to the US so they can turn White people into a minority. It's everyone who notices Walsh does shit like that who's unhinged.
Critics aren’t reviewing Am I Racist? because the film did not have preview screenings so critics could write reviews. This is by design, so they don’t have to deal with the bad publicity of poor reviews and so they can push the narrative that critics are too scared to review it.
In interviews, he claims he sent out dozens of copies of the film to specific organizations (I recall he mentioned Rolling Stone was one of them), who, by-and-large, declined to review the film. I don't know if there is a one true way to solicit reviews, and "preview screenings" is that way. Maybe it is.
@@bozimmerman Well, you can just look it up, the answer is pretty easy to find. It’s equally easy for Matt to claim he did that, but we also know that he fucking lies to the people he films for his “documentaries,” and DW copyright claims reviews on YT, so there’s no reason to believe he’s telling the truth.
@@ShadowProject01 How is asking an honest question trolling? Are you like one of those black masked atifa kids who goes around rallies telling people who they can and can't talk to?
Like, on the one hand, this is a comment to boost engagement to try and put this up the algo when people look up this video. On the other hand, I think the clear answer to the question of the video being reviewed, is that "His video is obviously what it is. So he does answer the question, unambiguously. Just not in the way the creator would hope."
@@hanmoehtet He didn’t say anything racist. Are you proud of being a race baiter? What do you think you accomplished? Maybe you should just open your widow and scream “RACIST!” at every person who walks by if you get off on making false claims… Just curious. Are you a leftist or righty? Hard to tell from your comments.
Jessie, i love all your content and reviews- they always show me things in a different angle and are informative in the best possible way. That being said, please don't make a long-form video about this movie. To me that feels like playing into Walsh's hand. This short analysis is concise and gives insight without giving a lot of energy to the Walshes of the world, you can leave it at that. Looking forward to watching everything else you make (that isn't a star trek spoiler for this slow watcher 😅) ❤
I've been seeing commercials for the Sylvester Stallone vehicle - Tulsa King. And, maybe my eyes are deceiving me, but I could swear to God that they have hired Matt Walsh to play a character in season 2.
Oh no I hope you are not talking about the beautifully beareded and bespectacled bestest boy, Martin Star (of Freaks and Geeks fame, aka Peter Parker's teacher in the MCU spidey movies too).
I bet the cool Matt Walsh who also appears in the US version of Ghosts wishes he could change his name to disassociate himself from this chucklefuck but legally he can't.
"They are terrified to even mention a film that mocks the DEI industry because they know the DEI industry can only survive if no one is allowed to question it." This coming from Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire that have videos that criticize them and their views copyright stricken and taken down left and right. The same Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire that throws a temper tantrum any time they are even remotely criticized for anything. In my best Darth Vader impression: "The Projection is strong with this one." I look forward to any video you make that tears apart any project by Walsh, a man with absolutely no critical thinking skills and whose knowledge of the world and life in general peeked in grade school... middle school if I'm feeling generous.
@@bigginsg8711 it's the intention behind it, like Jessie said. If Matt was criticizing scammers in a lucrative moral panic, that's one thing. But his point is "racism isn't happening and anyone who brings it up is dumb," meanwhile on his own podcast he complains about "anglo-saxon extinction" and that indigenous people should be grateful for being "civilized." There's plenty about the Left to critique, but Matt's not interested in nuance. He's just against anything that makes him uncomfortable.
@@Shampyon "All of my political opponents are nazis and this crap country where I get paid for talking crap about white people whilst drinking champagne is not worth saving" That's not speaking down to someone?
I really hope you do end up doing something longer form on nebula/your main channel. If you have the mental energy to of course! I can't imagine what a four hour long video essay worth of MW footage would do to a person.
So in review, Matt isn't funny/clever enough to make a comedy, nor is he intelligent enough or willing to put in the effort to make a documentary, so he tries to do both and succeeds at neither. The scary thing is a guy in my church said he has "some interesting ideas," which feels like a mental gateway drug. He points out a few extreme examples to get you to agree with him, and then drip feeds you his worse takes like how indigenous people should feel grateful for "being civilized." Yeah, I'm sure my friends on the Rez in Arizona are thrilled they get to live in an age where they're constantly in court trying to get electricity and clean water to their communities.
Ugh, I am so sick of the "This David Duke fellow has proposed some interesting ideas!" people. Quit lying to yourself and/or to the rest of us, coward.
@@silastithing6897 , grifting does require a kind of "dark" social intelligence, but it's not something we should celebrate, and it doesn't mean that a person is intelligent, thoughtful, knowledgeable, reflective, or inquisitive in other areas outside of their ability to sniff out and take advantage of an easy mark. It's like thinking a plant is globally "smart" because it can locate sources of sunlight.
So what you're saying is that listening to Matt's ideas is the equivalent of taking a gateway drug, and that you shouldn't do it? You're not going to learn anything if you resist opposing ideas. Go read up on the Socratic method and use it to grapple with Matt's and other ideas you disagree with. By the way, he isn't pointing out 'extreme' examples, not at all. The examples in the movie are the beating heart of the DEI movement, they're recurring themes, not extreme examples. :-)
This idea of a perfectly unbiased viewer is a myth. Everyone has bias. The only people alive who have no biases are literal vegetables. When Jessie says unbiased, she’s mocking y’all. Bias generally means very little when trying to gauge anything, from the truthfulness of a headline to the quality of a movie. It can affect those, sure. But trying to claim that a bias is what caused a wrongful summation of something (either a misrepresentation of a piece of news or a poor review of a film) requires a more substantive explanation than just screeching “bias”
@sethmilll ikr she obviously was triggered by the film. Most of the first 5 minutes were her trashing matt and the daily wire. I came for a review of the movie, not for that. I haven’t seen anything of Matt’s before, i got recommended to see the movie from a friend. The film was actually really good i recommend watching it if you haven’t already. Her saying that the film was just wanting people to get matt walsh merch isn’t true cause for one there was no mention of any merch of his and two i didn’t even know there was merch until this video so…hah, i might even look into getting some now all thanks to her i appreciate it.
He is so much better than Sasha. I absolutely love the disguise. It's inspired by the one gender ideology doctor that he disliked the most during his what is a woman movie
@@CiriOfcentra-eq4kq I'm sorry, didn't you watch the movie? The DEI workshop Walsh participated in? Walsh kept interrupting and apologizing, so eventually people recognized him. And then he somehow managed to get the police called on him. The people in the pub? Everyone looked at him like he was just spouting nonsense. (Which he was - the stuff he said was more absurd than everything everyone else said. Combined.) All those talk shows Walsh performed on? Yeah, NONE of those scenes was actually aired. Why? Either because someone recognized Walsh before the video could be aired, or because Walsh acted so weird that management just treated the video as garbage and threw it out. Robin DiAngelo? Walsh kept insisting so much on reparations over and over (despite the fact that DiAngelo explicitly told him that's not how reparations work), that he ended up making his own black colleague "Ben" uncomfortable. DiAngelo eventually agreed to pay money just to get rid of Matt - but only after checking with Ben if he would have accepted the money. The fake DEI workshop that Walsh created near the end of the documentary? Most of the audience walked out after Walsh said a few sentences.
Um, doesn't anybody think its odd that he's 'going undercover' and yet with somebody standing there filming the thing. Don't people realize you can hire actors to pretend they aren't acting?
I totally forgot about Jeremy Jahn’s “Sound of Freedom” review until I saw his “Am I Racist” review… biiiiiiig self report there. Anyways great video as always, have some engagement!
they are trying SO hard to penetrate the real world of entertainment but only proving their failure as screenwriters and moviemakers is only eclipsed by their failure as human beings.
If you were in good faith trying to disguise Matt Walsh, so he could Borat about and people genuinely not recognise him, how would you do it? To me, the answer is obvious, and it's not give him a wig and a ponytail... it would be to shave his beard and maybe hair off. Without that beard he'd be immediately unrecognisable. The fact he didn't do this says to me this whole concept is a scam (of course) and he lacked the stones to commit to the bit.
@@forsythejones2130 I disagree, I think its perfectly okay to armchair quarterback a play if you are an ideologue with no grasp on reality because of your marxist echo chamber.
Small point but relevant to discussions on race: Kazakhstan is actually the most northern central Asian republic, just south of Russia. It’s a former Soviet republic with a history that’s more Eurasian than middle eastern, except for the influence of Islam
"we DEFINITELY need to make a movie about how we are NOT racist!!" the "anti-DEI" grifters gettin all twisted ROFL I wouldn't even know about the term "D.E.I." if adult toddlers didn't throw temper tantrums about it and then... release those tantrums into actual movie theaters while saying "look how smart and normal I am." Twisted is the only word
Wow! A review of the movie! By an actual critic! It’s almost like Matt enjoys being told he is not a competent actor, director, producer, documentarian, whatever he wants to be called. Love you Jessie. I enjoy that you’re able to put your personal opinions aside and genuinely review conservative media from a technical standpoint. Thinking about the earnest and not chronically online folks who might go to see this movie is a very appreciated viewpoint. Spoilers for anyone who doesn’t know who MW and DW are: yes, Matt is a racist.
@@arjay9745 Jessie. She is an approved critic for Rotten Tomatoes. You can disagree with her opinions, but that doesn’t take away her place on the critics list. And while normally I wouldn’t respond to obvious rage bait, I’m happy to give the video some additional engagement.
@@goofballjar It's not that I disagree with Jesse's opinions. It's that this was a beginning-to-end, non-substantive ad hominem fest on Jesse's part. When this channel does an actual review, bringing up actual points from specific in-film contexts, then, and only then, I will accept the self-designation of 'reviewer'.
We must’ve watched different videos, because she references the film throughout. But again, thank you for responding and continuing to give Jessie additional engagement.
it's a Shockumentary - a word I just made up to emphasise that it's a movie that doesn't aim to document reality, but to enrage viewers over imagined culture war issues
@@libertyspikes666That’s like saying reality TV “documents reality” No, it documents a staged and highly edited version of reality presented in bad faith and achieved by lying to and misleading people.
You missed the point entirely, min 8:57 the point is that DEI instructors are grifters by charging “30k” for a presentation and sit around on chairs or 5K for a dinner to be told that there is no fix. That is the point of the movie another DEI instructor was charging 10k+ and it was a whiteboard presentation. Then he went online and got certified. The point of that is that he went through the training and proves that anyone can be a DEI expert as he mentions in the movie. Then about the Borat of the right, I think that only applies to the last scene were he pushes to see how far it can go.
And just another thing you claim that your video review had almost 1M views but the trailer has over 6M views and in the second week has grossed over 9M usd in the box office just to put things in to perspective.
Walsh was the one who charged 30k. He was the one who offered DiAngelo 10k-20k, unprompted. And every time he mentions a price tag, he never tells you if it's per person or per group. Basically, Walsh makes sh!t up. Not to mention how much _he_ charges for _his_ speeches.
@@dariocarraresi1823 even if it is per group and he did not charge that I actually watched the movie he made 3k from people that enrolled in the DEI which technically he can because he has a certificate. And unprompted, she did those interviews, workshops she even mentioned that in the movie I guess it is just gaslighting time.
@@ignisproductions7791 No, I'm talking about one of the DEI workshops that appeared early on in the movie - the one who, according to Walsh, charged 30k. The Daily Wire staged that workshop. There's even a police report about it.
@@dariocarraresi1823 yes they staged all of them. Like the interview the race to dinner that is how they got the cameras in. Same as everyother movie like it that is how you have control of the film. What was not staged was the content.
Lord help me, I almost feel bad for M.W., because it doesn't seem like he does anything well. He failed upwards and desperately wants people to think of him as some kind of supremely talented "actor"/"raconteur" when he's just an average bearded dude.
@pixelsheep8939 the only people who bothered to review it are people he panders to. He only has fans so long as he tells them what they want to hear ((look how quick they turned on him when he said not to drink raw milk))
I think it's because it's too tightly groomed. It doesn't fade at all into his cheeks, so it looks more like a hard line between his beard and his face. Which might be the "right way to do it"? But Matt would be more concerned with Doing It Right than choosing what looks better for him
As a black person almost every group shown in this movie was offensive and pandering and I honestly think these ppl think less of me and everyone that looks like me.
yeah i saw this movie and everyone was howling or cringing at those seminars. i cant imagine one black person would watch this movie and think those seminars are a good thing. say what you want about matt walsh, but that doesnt mean these scam artists he spoke to are good people.
@@nullakjg767 thats a fair opinion, but matt framing these seminars and the author of White Fragility as the be all and end all of anti-racist thought is really disingenuous when there are so many authors and thinkers out there and on the ground work being done.
@@llynxfyremusic There is no "be all and end all of anti-racist thought" because people arrive at these ideals by themselves as they are basic ideas like "don't pee on your food". Is like having an expert on how to eat from a plate, very redundant and pretentious as being against racism is a natural conclusion to most of the population, yet media profits by selling the idea that we are still in the 19 century and all minorities have shackles. And if you disagree you are evil
@@llynxfyremusic I have yet to see a version of it that's not condescending and regressive. I don't want white ppl to consider my race when dealing with me just my character. They would rather the world handle me with children's gloves on as if I'm fragile and need anything from them
Because one, the video editing of those scenes is terrible, with lots of cuts, different clips from different moments being mashed together etc; And two, Jessie already saw similar crab from "What Is A Woman?"
@@dariocarraresi1823 that’s just an opinion though, no one can know for sure if it’s out of context editing except for the editors. And most of the clips need zero other context bcz they are so ridiculous
@@j3n1us Nah, knowing Walsh's history with these kinds of things, it's safe to assume that he erased important context. Like when in "What Is A Woman?" he censored any mention of the difference between gender and sex, arriving to the point of taking a professor's explanation (that Walsh himself requested) and turning it into an incomprehensible montage with deafening classical music.
@@dariocarraresi1823 so we know Kamala’s history of prosecuting minorities to the max for small charges. Does that mean that’s happening every time? One thing can happen in your eyes and still be different another time
Well done review. I agree that his edgy character makes it seem likes it's a movie for his own audience. The people that you need to convince are the ones on the political left, not the political right. The best way to do that is to be genuinely curious of the other side's views and to be respectful when talking with them. His edgy and rude behavior would, if nothing else, put left-leaning viewers on the defensive. However, he did touch on systemic racism. One of the interviews in the film was with Wilfred Reilly who is a right-leaning political scientist. He shared some interesting perspectives on there being a "demand" for racism from the left that the "supply" can't keep up with, and he shared statistics to back up his arguments.
First time seeing your content. A traditionally conservative person, irrespective of my views on this current subject, have to say copyright striking your video is predatory and hypocritical to who Matt Walsh and the Dailyawire portray themselves to be. Good on you for creating a civil discourse and shame on the daily wire
Tell that to the Olympic Committee, who also submitted a copyright strike. Clearly, mistakes were made. But, to quote Jessie, "it suits his narrative to play the victim".
All movie companies and content creators, left and right, strike any video that uses more than an 8-second clip of their content. Jesse knows this very well and is obviously being disingenuous.
@@dariocarraresi1823She said he parodies when he's actually just exposing these people. She also said he was kicked out several times but was only kicked out once, before he put on the disguise. Hope this helps!
@@Mopark25 First of all, "he parodied" and "he exposed" aren't mutually exclusive. Walsh tried to go undercover in order to expose DEI instructors; the problem is that he chose to act like an unrealistic parody of a DEI activist. As a result, as Jessie said, many people were weirded out and suspicious. Speaking of which: Walsh was kicked out by both the DEI group meeting (and he didn't present himself as Matt Walsh, he used fake names) and the DEI dinner. Also, you know all those scenes where Walsh went to TV shows? Walsh managed to get inside the studios and do his comedy act, but NONE of those scenes were actually aired by the networks. Why? Because all of them smelled the fraud. On top of that, when he goes to interview various civilians, you can see many of them recognize that he's a fraud, or even recognize him outright. The same thing happened when he tried to make a fake DEI course.
Him being repeatedly figured out as an alt-right crank in real time is the actual comedy in this movie, I don't know how he thought this was a performance to be proud of 😂😂😂
When it comes to the Conservative Party, there are so many unsettling and unloving things I have to read and watch. But what I’ve learned through my walk with Christ is that you have to have grace. Grace is rated E for everyone and it is unlimited with Jesus. Even me, a horrible, rotten freaking sinner. I swear I lived my life apart from God and boy did I live it up. Though it lead me down a path of addiction, confusion, hatred of others, and love of self. You see a lot of holier than thou, self loving conservatives destroying the image of Christianity all over the news. I don’t identify with that. God is not a political party no matter what the media would like to tell you. Matt Walsh is not a representative of Christ. Self-sacrificial love is not a phrase used a lot these days. The only one in human history that lived that out to a t (no pun intended) was Jesus Christ. Make no mistake, when He said in John 14:6 “Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” He wasn’t lying. Don’t believe me? Read the freaking Book. Read it for yourself and ask yourself if He was telling the truth. The day they find Jesus’ bones is the day I give up my Faith, but as it stands, Jesus of Nazareth died, was buried, and rose again on the third day. He ascended into Heaven in bodily form and is seated at the right hand of the Father. I hope to one day see Him so I can cry and just say thank you myself. I love you all so dearly, God bless you whoever is reading this ❤️✌️
One of the things that irritates me the most about this movie is that he really thought just putting on a wig the same color as his actual hair but long and tied back would make him into some kind of iconic sjw liberal Borat character but like he just looks like Matt Walsh with long hair
@@UrOnTheWrongSide no it’s that he gets so pissed off about it. Like bruh that was the point, he wasn’t changing his appearance to much due to it being a satire movie.
@@Peterson1451 You mean how they said they were irritated that he thought he looked any different? Well, he did look stupid, It's not that deep. Lol Move on.
I feel like the review just completely missed the whole thing. It does have that comedic satire however the people in the movie are real people that are not scripted.
Matt Walsh on Native Americans: Well they all fought in wars, so it was right for Europeans to commit genocide Matt Walsh on slavery: Well every nation did it back then, so you can't unfairly blame the U.S. Also, slavery was very beneficial to the U.S.
@@PatrickWDunne It's a strawmen of what he said, but sure. I find the first one dubious, but the second one is just factually correct. In most non-western countries some degree of slavery is still the norm. Libia still has open air slave markets, half our stuff is manufactured by something like slaves in east Asia with minerals recycled by children on African garbage belts. It's also weird to blame the US for it because the US only existed since 1776 when most slaves were already taken there by the Brits and French a century before.
@@zachanator2011 “Her”? What video are you commenting on? The dude in this video is no more feminine than a bag of recycling with lipstick lips drawn on it. How about we stick to the documentary and not making a joke out of what being a woman (or movie critic) (or human being) is.
My problem with the concept of the movie is exactly that, its superficial and pandering. What was said about figures like the mainstream DEI profiteers has been said time and time again, free and legitimate criticism is out there. A lot of Walshs criticism from the right towards the conservatives™️ gets drowned out by the hordes. I am far far from a progressive or post modernists but at least i will acknowledge that their world view isnt consistent. Many of these discussions on these topics about gender/sexuality/race go over the heads of those in the mainstream, not exactly a new problem tho. If you remember Spencer versus Sargon, as Sargon now is now appropriating points from Spencer, but a big issue for the cons™️ is the fundamental denial of racial identity -and by extension denying sexual and gender identity- but straining the importance of ones ideas and opinions. Something something Martin Luther King JR Is infallible. But also somehow forgetting that "whiteness" "white people" is inherently progressive and has a basis in modern liberalism. Its also why i believe the term "abolish whiteness" is actually triggering to them because of the lack of understanding the fundamental concept of where that term comes from. I tried explaining this to some of my friends on the far right and many get it. But those who are lukewarm or reactionary dont. These cons dont get it, never have. They only started tagging on "but what about white people" because of the far right pressure put upon them. Anyways good criticism. God Bless.
Honestly ..i think if you ask yourself sincerely it may often be an attempt to improve yourself.. Asking yourself, is that gut feeling based in racism, why do i assume xy, why did I laugh at that joke...can be enlightning ;) But in case of matt walsh? The answer is simply yes!
@@saraa.4295I think the word "sincerely" is how we know Matt doesn't meet the criteria. He'll saw off his own leg before he seriously reevaluates a single opinion of his own
LOL. I bet you thought that was clever when you posted this… The irony is: the grifters you’re trying to defend are saying ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACIST. So… what are you doing here, ya racist?
One of the criticism is that he interviews some of the most unhinged people. Since it's a comedy that has a goal at killing the business of grifters, he should do that.
This movie... I don't need to watch it to know that the answer to the titular question is "yes". That is always the answer when someone asks that question. They can either whine about that fact or try to change.
This dude just hates the guy who made the movie. I didn’t know who Walsh was before he was making this movie, but I watched it because it looked hilarious. It’s actually very factual. I don’t think this guy really watched it. Probably just pulled clips.
I actually ran across your review for this on rotton tomatoes yesterday! I was safe to assume you'd be making a video reviewing it. I'm so thankful for your bravery in sitting through the entire thing because I would not have been able to. Because if the cinama industry was a restaurant, watching this movie would be like paying to eat directly out of the dumpster. I need someone with a deeper ability of analysis and self awareness to actually tackle a serious question. Matt walsh just doesn't have the mental maturity to ask deep questions and actually analyze them. It's kinda his thing lol.
Technically speaking. Everybody is racist. You can never 100% turn away from bias. It just falls under a spectrum. Some people are more racist then others but ironically it is not a black or white situation
Bias does not necessarily mean racism. Bias is the tendency to gravitate to someone familiar (I.e. someone like yourself). There is no malice in that, just natural self- centeredness.
An alternate armchair psychologist theory: Everyone is a Tribalist, of which racism is one kind of tribalism. Whichever group identity one ties their identity to, that is their Tribe. Everyone outside of it is Other and Beneath. If true, it means that everyone CAN be racist, but they could also be Nationaist, Sexist, Globalist, or any sort of Ist. The wolf you feed helps determine it.
I think what people like Matt Walsh think is a different kind of racism. You can have bias and be naturally inclined to gravitate towards people similar to yourself, sure. That's probably what you're referring to. What the DW and its following believe is something more to the effect of "White is SUPERIOR to all other races BECAUSE of my whiteness." This isn't just something white conservatives think, either. This is the type of racism that is instilled into people all over the world in the form of extreme nationalism.
The issue is that society is structurally racist. You can't avoid it without taking positive steps to learn. That often means listening to marginalized people.
Mirror universe Mat(hilda) Walsh released their latest film "What is a Racist?", following on the heels of the underground sensation, "Am I a Woman?"
Why couldn’t we get this time line? That sounds wonderful
Honestly, I would unironically watch the fuck out of those.
a movie that could be 2 seconds
The answer to Walsh's question: Yes!
What he hell is the DEI industry?
Two seconds is a whole 2000 milliseconds. One can say yes is less that one, if you're fast enough. Or if you want to be fancy as add a fuck in the front.
@@lkeke35 Diversity Equality Inclusivity?
Thats 1 second more than how much Matt lasts in bed.
@@kaoko111 He has like 12 kids, so I guess he had some action.
Matt Walsh: everyone's afraid to review my documentary
Also Matt Walsh: *copyright strikes anyone who reviews his documentary*
Everyone is afraid of having to listen to his voice for 2 hours more like
it’s particularly annoying on here because exploiting a false DMCA claim to censor criticism has been around since early yt; while at the same time yt has been shown recently to use uploads to train AI without notifying users
@@TheRogueCommand I think they're more scared of his 5head. If you measure from the top of his hairline down to the eyebrow, its the same distance as from his eyebrow down to his mouth. That's terrifying. I feel like he could psychically attack me with his massive ego through the screen.
It's also funny because the prefrontal cortex often has functions related to egotism and narcissistic behaviour, so it's actually a physiological indicator of egotism to have a huge forehead
@@amelioravictoriadionyssia3323 i would like to inform you you are not actually making a valid point by playing on his appearance, also do you have a source for the argument about the forehead and ego claim?
@@BrunottilegendeIt's helpful that he has a big forehead, bigger target
What is a woman was a classic😂
I enjoyed the movie.
Yeah and it’s not even a movie the only actor in that film was Matt Walsh. All the other people had to do was talk and share their opinions ☠️. And it was entertaining. And WILD.
"Review my movie! No, not like that! I meant uncritical praise!"
Review my movie, ill censor the reviews I don't like to make my garbage film appear better than it is.
He’d love Jeremy Jahns lol
I'm sure his audience would cancel and if he says anything positive about the movie so it goes both ways.
@KnightOfNewColu for giving an honest review? Everyone going into this with bias
Except they're too scared to review it HAHA
Borat is a character based in Kazakhstani, that is a central Asian country, it's racist to assume his character as middle eastern because of his physical attributes. Shame on you.
Shame on the people that Borat interviewed, because a lot of them assumed that he was middle-eastern. Which, you know, what exactly what Sacha Baron Cohen was counting on.
minor nit... Kazakhstan (where Borat is supposedly from) is not "middle eastern".
I thought that too. I think he's supposed to be like a mix of different "foreign" stereotypes.
I don't remember what it's supposed to be, other than "post-Soviet" and of course "Kazakh". I think SBC chose that country for Borat exactly because Westerners know so little about it.
@@AdrianColley , exactly. The point was to make fun of Americans' ignorance, xenophobia, and provincialism.
@@AdrianColley its supposed to be a soviet block islamic nation lol. did you not get that from how he talks about women or jewish peopel?
you really think these white holier than thou saviors care for other cultures to be bothered to know?
It's a great movie that exposes the DEI grifters for exactly what they are.
Plus, it carries a rather wholesome message to counter them: Don't focus on race, focus on being a good human being and treating others well!
"sounds like cope"
Yes, yes it does.
"but this time it's true"
That just sounds even more like cope!
To be fair if he hadn't tried to FIT IN he'd have been excluded
"What is a woman?"
"Am I a racist?"
What's the rhetorical question going to be for the title of his next film?
"Is climate change really real? " , "What iS real mAn ?", "Am i an ass ? So many dumb possibilities with this guy XD
@@00noenoah maybe "Am I homophobic" ?
"is book burning bad?"
Does jet fuel melt steel beams?
Well, what IS a woman?
Would you consider two people disparaging a group of other people based solely on their race being different, would you call that racism?
My thoughts: I didn't watch the film. From what I have heard audiences laughed a lot and enjoyed it as a comedy. Others appear to take it as the negative side of the 'anti-racist community' as a whole. Matt Walsh also got interviewed on CNN about the film so some people did show interest in the film from the mainstream media.
So Matt Walsh's big new idea is just "We have Borat at home." If I had expectations for the Daily Wire, I would be dissapointed.
I mean, come on. Jessie putting Sisko in the background was probably more racially sensitive than anything the Daily Wire could come up with.
Another movie made by people who failed at movie making
Fun fact, the word "sisko" is Finnish for sister :) no reason
The whole daily wire is a "we have ______at home" meme.
Steve shives looks like Matt Walsh I know that doesn't want to make shives jump off a cliff
Borat was a guy in disguise saying crazy things to normal people. This was abnormal people saying crazy things to a guy in disguise.
I'm so baffled by the fact that TDW has millions and millions of dollars, but they won't buy Matthew a second wig.
🤣🤣 seriously
He’s meant to wear a cheap wig to make fun of you leftist snowflakes who put boobs on men’s bodies.. he’s showing how fake extras don’t make you something else. Wig = sarcasm on dummies
Is that all you've got, lo ser? 😂😂
That's how they make money: make crap as cheaply as possible on the budget their billionaire sugar daddy gives them
I think that's the thing, he thinks he doesn't NEED a second wig. I think he thinks he doesn't need one AND that it's an epic iconic costume just like Borat that is universally beloved by all audiences.
"No one ever reviews my very good movie!"
*Jessie Gender, Dead Domain, and Some More News BARGE into the chat, followed by half of leftTube*
Seriously though, that epic 4-hour evisceration deserves a rewatch or fifteen. My 72yo trans parent loved it, too! 💛
Seriously, this is, like, the third review I’ve watched of this movie that “critics are afraid to review.” I’ve seen more reviews of this movie than Deadpool and Wolverine.
@@briham86im pretty sure he means from Mainstream film critics & major networks or show. We all know Mainstream media only pushes far left narrative on racism, sexism, etc and doesnt allow any objection to their false narrative
@briham86 its up to 10 reviews now on Rotten Tomatoes. 80% critic score and 98% audience score.
@@briham86 Are you really suggesting it's about what you, a single person has watched and not about the lack of reviews on Rotten Tomatoes while the movie was in the top 5 most viewed?
@@suckieduckie top 5 most viewed in a year where Hollywood has dropped the ball for advertising anything
In what universe is this an unbiased review?
In the echochamber universe.
Exactly😂
In what universe is this an intelligent statement?
@@stevenredpath9332
In what universe is this an intelligent reply ?
I assumed that was a bit of a joke given the asterisk and the fact that Walsh is an extremely biased "documentarian" anyway. Also, did you watch the video? Jesse did her best to focus on the film alone and not get into the rest of the Daily Wire's rubbish. Like, she could have pointed out that Walsh is cosplaying as that teacher character from Mr. Birchum and acting like that wacko caricature is a real person that exists. She did not, because this is a simple review about why the film is unappealing solely in context with itself. So, she's doing her best to be unbiased, but we should all know that "true objectivism" is not possible. We're humans with past experiences that inevitably give us biases. So long as we are aware of them and how they color our opinions and analysis, it's okay. That's just how being human works.
The first part of reviewing a film is knowing the title of the film.
I caught that as well... but I think it was intentional, to add a little to his/hers/whoever's notion that it thinks Matt actually is a racist. Throwing the "a" in there points the finger a little more directly... if that makes sense.
@@Amazonian11 Well, given that this is coming from a member of a community that is extremely sensitive about deadnaming and using the wrong pronouns, it's a little rich to consistently use the wrong name for the film.... And if it's done intentionally then it's also hypocritical.
@@jabasabon absolutely agreed 💯
"The critics aren't reviewing it because it's too good. Sounds like some grade A hardcore cope."
There has never been a movie so good that critics won't review it. There has never been more cope than this denial.
@@JohnBainbridge0 hello there John
@@PatrickWDunne Ahoy!
Copium overdose.
It's like he heard himself say it and immediately knew how stupid it sounded, so he... doubled down on it. Walsh in a nutshell.
@@AdrianColleyyes! I think you got the nail on the head
Truth is, Jeremy Jahns gave what is in my opinion a real unbiased review of the film. It’s hard to imagine this review as unbiased when you say, in response to Walsh manipulating a race grifter to give $30 to a black person as reparations, that it’s ignoring the wider context of how reparations is a step toward building solutions to racism in this country. It’s not trying to build a context for this, it’s trying to make fun of a race grifter. Borat didn’t meet with a bunch of Trump supporters to try mend the divisiveness of the country through ideals, or even set the tone or basis for that, he just wanted to mock their idiocy.
Another commenter said it best; is your criticism that Walsh didn’t take these race grifters seriously enough? Imagine a conservative reviewing Borat and saying “Borat was insincere when he spoke with the Trump supporters, and didn’t address the key issues that Trump supporters have; rather he just found the stupidest ones and mocked them by giving them an open mic.” That conservative would be correct, but woefully ignorant to the idea of what constitutes a satirical comedy. A stark difference between the two is that the Trump supporters Borat made fun of were in positions of low-information ideologues, while the race grifters Walsh made fun of were in positions of power.
Ah yes, Walsh manipulated DiAngelo by insisting and insisting until he made everyone in the room uncomfortable - including Walsh's black colleague. Eventually DiAngelo had to ask the guy if he was okay with getting 30$ just to make Walsh stop. Wow, so revealing. Such idiocy. I'm impressed - did I mention how impressed I am?
@@dariocarraresi1823 How do you know Walsh's colleague was uncomfortable? He seemed pretty down with it. As a producer on the film, he is in on the joke. Or maybe you prefer to do black folks' thinking for them? Do you want to inform him that he was uncomfortable? Because he didn't seem to know it.
@@therovinghome6390 The scene was edited in a pretty weird way to obfuscate things, however DiAngelo released a statement explaining what really happened during that scene. Among other things, DiAngelo outright told Walsh that his idea of "reparations" was weird (this part was kept in the movie) because it's about the government addressing a systemic issue caused by its own segregation policies, not about individual white people paying individual black people (this part was cut out). DiAngelo also pointed out that Walsh kept making everyone uncomfortable.
When Walsh read the statement during an interview, his only objection was about DiAngelo's comment on Walsh's wig; for everything else, he had no objection to DiAngelo's version.
@@dariocarraresi1823 I read her statement. You definitely did not watch the movie, or you would not have quoted her condescending take (which is generally how she treats people of color) on the producer’s response.
@@Tejroe how can you think anyone in this video other than Matt Walsh has power? Like the guy's a prick but painting him as some kind of underdog is just blatantly facetious
One of the most hilarious scenes I’ve ever seen in a movie when he tricked her into giving him money. I couldn’t stop laughing
It's funny because DiAngelo kept trying to explain to Walsh that reparations don't work that way, but he didn't listen. He kept insisting and insisting until she gave up because he was making everyone - including the black guy she gave the money to - uncomfortable.
It's hilarious how Walsh thought that being a little whiny femaledog was a "gotcha".
The newest installment in Matt Walsh's neverending quest for a gender affirming haircut.
Idk about ya'll but I never once had to make any kind of movie about not being racist.
the guy had the audacity to condemn people for taking sick days, meanwhile his billionaire sugar daddy pays for him to fly around doing this crap and calling it "work"
"We need to make a song about how it's bad to diddle kids!"
If you think this movie is about Walsh not being a racist and not about the DEI people being incredibly racist swindlers I think you missed the point.
@suckieduckie the thing is, he's one of the incredibly racist swindlers
@@suckieduckie
DEI isn't racist in the same way hiring an all black team isn't racist. Go away.
I don’t like Walsh at all, I laughed my ass off. The people he interviewed are absolutely nuts. All you really have to do is let them talk and the movie makes itself.
You didn't watch the review. And you probably believe more of Walsh's claims like "Kinsey molested infants" or "they are using chemical castration drugs on trans kids".
@@dariocarraresi1823yeah people seem to think these people are "crazy" when Matt Walsh and his team are in charge of editing
@@Cruzeoc101 if that's what you think I wrote then please practice your reading comprehension for your own good
@@Syv_ a lack of source footage doesn't make the edit more trustworthy
@@Cruzeoc101 The point I'm making is Matt Walsh and his team in charge of editing means they can decide what footage goes and what doesn't so it's easy to make the interviewed people look "crazy"
Another problem is that his fake hair doesn’t look any funnier than his usual hair
His beard looks like a prop.
@@hollandscottthomas I think that's what has always bothered me about his beard. It looks like it's made of cheap black faux fur.
And for a guy who hates gender non conformity, he sure does love any excuse for a wig
what about the fact that you had to go through surgery to pretend to be a woman, and you're not even close to ever being one, you'll remain a sad little man
Leave it to the libtards to make fun of someone’s appearance then be completely and utterly offended if someone does the same to them lmao
The amount of bias in this review was awful. Sucks that you spent the first 5 minutes bashing the author of the film and then continued doing so after stating you’d try to be objective. This was a horrible review and gave no real depth beyond “I don’t like Matt Walsh”.
This whole channel is politically biased. 😆
I first saw a poster for this when I was browsing for something coming up at my local Regals. I didn't recognize him at first because he wasn't the head of a grown-ass man on the body of a diapered infant.
I'm surprised you can identify what a man looks like.
I'm a long-haired guy who's more progressive than Matt could understand (not a difficult bar to clear), but from my experience, I don't get how his wig makes for a liberal stereotype. They did the same in Mr. Birchum, I think it's something about "hipsters" from 15 years ago?
All of their "comedy" is about 10-20 years outdated
I guess he's going for "creepy yogi"? I dunno, his creepiness is so inherent to his base self that it's very difficult to spin into a satirical trait
He puts on the wig but keeps the swag-less untrimmed patriarchal bushy beard. Make it make sense MW!
he's still into that "hippies have long hair" mindset, probably.
Why is a beard patriarchal? As a Sikh we are not allowed to remove our hair for religious reasons and our religion promotes equality so...?@moustik31
I'm mad they took your other video down. Definitely gonna watch the reupload. Love your work as always, Jessie. You're the best
They took down Jessie’s re-upload as well. So sad
My review: She's actually quite awful. She heart-reacts all the oh-so-clever comments about how the movie could be two seconds long. Not exactly the reactions of someone who reviewed the film in good faith or fairness, is it?
Ah, fuck it. You'll all ignore that and move on to singing her praises. Why do I bother?
@@Ultranothinguhm, you do see the video you’re replying to, no? How can you say she’s not reviewing in good faith while quite literally commenting on a good faith video review lol not to mention the 4hr video she made critiquing What Is A Woman…if only the DW didn’t sensor everything criticizing them. Not very free speech of them
@@karahampton1285 well, imagine that a four hour review of a movie that's an hour and a half long contains enough copywritten material that a person could feasibly reduce said review down to a point where they no longer have to buy a ticket to said film. The answer is right there in your own comment, dude.
But no, this wasn't a video made in good faith. It's completely one-sided and biased, and the SOUL of the review is in the reviewer's CLEAR presumptions and established feelings toward the filmmaker, his politics, etc.
The worst part is that I know you know it's actually true. It's too obviously true that any person who arises in the morning of their own volition and can feed and clothe themselves can plainly glean the truth of it. We ALL know that this person didn't like the film before they even saw it, and created the review to fit. Can we all start being honest with each other? Please?
@@Ultranothing Damn you sure like to write essays and fellate Map Walsh. Is this your burner account Matthew? Lmao 😂😂😂
I love saying you are giving an unbiased opinion and then spewing the most biased left leaning rhetoric possible. 😅
Hmmm... wonder why reality would lean left... almost as if that's how reality works
@@juliusdauksys2183 ya ya, the reality of leftism, one failed state after another lol
Of course
@@juliusdauksys2183fucking delusional 😭💀
@@juliusdauksys2183”Checkmate Conservatives!!!”
Oh God I can't escape this damn movie ad. I love you, Jessie, but I'm watching this one on mute, I can't deal with another second of Matt Walsh's voice. (And the answer is yes, you are, Matt)
It's like gravel in a blender...but more boring.
Honestly valid xD
I think people playing clips of him should speed the clip up, not for copyright reasons but so his voice sounds less annoying. And that's coming from someone who doesn't like it when clips in videos are at X2 speed.
I loathe it! and Stephen Crowder's blaccent as well. awful men who are so miserable they need to bring everyone else down.
3:54 here the review starts and after that, zero clips with his voice are used
So your criticism is basically that Walsh doesn’t take race baiting grifters seriously?
The issue is that he goes into these interviews with bad faith and edits these people to look bad
@@xdarkwolf2255They literally all ready look bad by what they are saying? All white people are ******** I can’t even say what they say on here.
@@Syv_ you argue like mac from always sunny
The fact that Matt Walsh admitted to going into these interviews with intent to make the people look dumb while also going under false pretenses and having final say how the source footage gets edited is unethical and proof of bad faith.
The fact that I don't trust a man who has obvious bad faith and a history of editing footage to make himself look better like he did in the previous film isn't bad faith. It's healthy skepticism.
@@xdarkwolf2255sounds like a typical CNN interview
No, the point is that he takes grifters too seriously. He’s taking a parasitic industry that grew off of racial justice movements and presenting it as the racial justice movements.
The difference between Borat and Matt Walsh is that Borat asks ridiculous questions to normal people. Matt Walsh asks normal questions to ridiculous people.
Walsh also waffles over nothing and edits the crab out of the footage, but you clearly didn't watch the review so you didn't know.
@@dariocarraresi1823 I watched. Trust me 🤮
@@dariocarraresi1823 I doubt you watched the movie. Specifically, what was edited to take something out of context ? When Robin Diangelo paid reparations, how was that edited to make her look bad ?
@@toneloc7910 First of all, the entire interiew before the "pay reparations" bits is edited to the point of making DiAngelo sound incoherent and incomprehensible.
Then there's the part about reparations. Here's what was cut out from that part:
>Walsh repeatedly insisting, over and over, that DiAngelo should give money to Walsh's black colleague. It got to the point that he was making everyone uncomfortable.
>DiAngelo pointing out, multiple times, that reparations don't work that way.
>DiAngelo saying that she isn't an expert on reparations, and suggesting various other academics and sources that Walsh could consult.
>DiAngelo asking the black guy if he was okay with receiving money (because she genuinely thought that Walsh prepared the whole "reparations" stunt without asking the guy first).
@@dariocarraresi1823 She IS incoherent and incomprehensible. She isn't an expert on reparations ? That is laughable. Progressives are calling for them all the time. If she didn't want to pay reparations, she didn't have to.
What?! It's propaganda?! Who would have guessed?
Having not seen the movie, having no plans to, and pausing my first watch at 22 seconds in to type this comment:
Yes, Matt Walsh. You are.
Nah. You people are just unhinged.
@@giantfriendcrab6571 relax the guy must have just graduated from daycare..
@@giantfriendcrab6571 Meanwhile, that weirdo making these trashy "documentaries" doesn't even have a door, much less any hinges to secure one.
@@giantfriendcrab6571 Yeah, the guy who defended white supremacist and terrorist-defending group VDARE as just having "unfashionable views" is totally not racist. Nothing racist about pushing a conspiracy theory that Jews are deliberately forcing illegal immigration of non-Whites to the US so they can turn White people into a minority. It's everyone who notices Walsh does shit like that who's unhinged.
He's actually not though
Critics aren’t reviewing Am I Racist? because the film did not have preview screenings so critics could write reviews. This is by design, so they don’t have to deal with the bad publicity of poor reviews and so they can push the narrative that critics are too scared to review it.
In interviews, he claims he sent out dozens of copies of the film to specific organizations (I recall he mentioned Rolling Stone was one of them), who, by-and-large, declined to review the film. I don't know if there is a one true way to solicit reviews, and "preview screenings" is that way. Maybe it is.
@@bozimmerman Well, you can just look it up, the answer is pretty easy to find.
It’s equally easy for Matt to claim he did that, but we also know that he fucking lies to the people he films for his “documentaries,” and DW copyright claims reviews on YT, so there’s no reason to believe he’s telling the truth.
@@manderly33 What did he lie about?
@@DemonDog444👈🏿 don’t feed the troll
@@ShadowProject01 How is asking an honest question trolling? Are you like one of those black masked atifa kids who goes around rallies telling people who they can and can't talk to?
Like, on the one hand, this is a comment to boost engagement to try and put this up the algo when people look up this video. On the other hand, I think the clear answer to the question of the video being reviewed, is that "His video is obviously what it is. So he does answer the question, unambiguously. Just not in the way the creator would hope."
Racist and proud. Way to go chief.
@@hanmoehtet He didn’t say anything racist. Are you proud of being a race baiter?
What do you think you accomplished? Maybe you should just open your widow and scream “RACIST!” at every person who walks by if you get off on making false claims…
Just curious. Are you a leftist or righty? Hard to tell from your comments.
Jessie, i love all your content and reviews- they always show me things in a different angle and are informative in the best possible way.
That being said, please don't make a long-form video about this movie. To me that feels like playing into Walsh's hand.
This short analysis is concise and gives insight without giving a lot of energy to the Walshes of the world, you can leave it at that.
Looking forward to watching everything else you make (that isn't a star trek spoiler for this slow watcher 😅)
❤
I've been seeing commercials for the Sylvester Stallone vehicle - Tulsa King. And, maybe my eyes are deceiving me, but I could swear to God that they have hired Matt Walsh to play a character in season 2.
Oh no I hope you are not talking about the beautifully beareded and bespectacled bestest boy, Martin Star (of Freaks and Geeks fame, aka Peter Parker's teacher in the MCU spidey movies too).
@@moondog548 Maybe. I could be wrong. But whoever he was, in the commercial, he looks pretty similar to Matt Walsh in his stupid fucking wig. Lol.
I bet the cool Matt Walsh who also appears in the US version of Ghosts wishes he could change his name to disassociate himself from this chucklefuck but legally he can't.
@@moondog548 Oh my god they do look alike 😮
But...its not a parody, he just lets these people expose themself, what is going here.
Media Matters' article on Matt Walsh. He just talked, and they exposed his words.
@@dariocarraresi1823
Yeah...."his words" are what made people in the movie look evil, greedy and downright authoritarian.
@@Ixiah27 No, that was his malicious video editing.
@@dariocarraresi1823
Sure...his editing made these people explain how they use DEI to scam money.
@@Ixiah27 Nothing in the movie supports your claim.
"They are terrified to even mention a film that mocks the DEI industry because they know the DEI industry can only survive if no one is allowed to question it."
This coming from Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire that have videos that criticize them and their views copyright stricken and taken down left and right. The same Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire that throws a temper tantrum any time they are even remotely criticized for anything.
In my best Darth Vader impression: "The Projection is strong with this one."
I look forward to any video you make that tears apart any project by Walsh, a man with absolutely no critical thinking skills and whose knowledge of the world and life in general peeked in grade school... middle school if I'm feeling generous.
Actions speak louder than words, everyone is praising the film even non biased reviewers. So keep hatin…haters are fans too lol
Why you mad people making fun of leftism?
@@bigginsg8711 it's the intention behind it, like Jessie said. If Matt was criticizing scammers in a lucrative moral panic, that's one thing. But his point is "racism isn't happening and anyone who brings it up is dumb," meanwhile on his own podcast he complains about "anglo-saxon extinction" and that indigenous people should be grateful for being "civilized." There's plenty about the Left to critique, but Matt's not interested in nuance. He's just against anything that makes him uncomfortable.
@@TheRogueCommand Incorrect. Matt never says racism isnt happening.
@@TheRogueCommandBut he showed evidence in his movie. He proved his point. His intentions were to mock stupid behavior.
Can anyone tell me where to find this movie? I can’t find it on Google or TH-cam any help would be greatly appreciated
On DailyWire Plus.
What did you think of the race for dinner scene? I think it's very sad that white people pay to get spoken down to.
I think it's sad when people think being confronted with facts is getting "spoken down to".
@@Shampyon "All of my political opponents are nazis and this crap country where I get paid for talking crap about white people whilst drinking champagne is not worth saving"
That's not speaking down to someone?
So.... more DEI training?
@@Shampyon So you'd pay to be spoken down to by a woman who identified as being white thinking they'd have a better life? That's funny.
@@Shampyon What facts?
Lazier and more bad faith than What Is A Woman? I admit, that’s an accomplishment of note.
@@damejanea.macdonald2371 that is actually pretty impressive!
It’s really sad how many people apparently don’t realize that he’s a joke and evil
What is a woman? Try giving a scientific biological explanations instead of mentally ill delusional emotions.
Or do you feel exposed? Dont hide the fact you see him as evil due to not being part of your way of thinking.
Ok, go pay reparations then.
@@BaoPhan-ld5jo Is this satire? Do you seriously not understand how silly that is, even after having it pointed out to you?
I really hope you do end up doing something longer form on nebula/your main channel. If you have the mental energy to of course! I can't imagine what a four hour long video essay worth of MW footage would do to a person.
When you speak at 2x speed
Kazahstan is not in the Middle East.
So in review, Matt isn't funny/clever enough to make a comedy, nor is he intelligent enough or willing to put in the effort to make a documentary, so he tries to do both and succeeds at neither. The scary thing is a guy in my church said he has "some interesting ideas," which feels like a mental gateway drug. He points out a few extreme examples to get you to agree with him, and then drip feeds you his worse takes like how indigenous people should feel grateful for "being civilized." Yeah, I'm sure my friends on the Rez in Arizona are thrilled they get to live in an age where they're constantly in court trying to get electricity and clean water to their communities.
Too many "Christians" that disgusted me out of any church because of bigotry...so much ick...
Ugh, I am so sick of the "This David Duke fellow has proposed some interesting ideas!" people. Quit lying to yourself and/or to the rest of us, coward.
He was intelligent enough to make $6+ million from the movie though as its lead. So that's at least something
@@silastithing6897 , grifting does require a kind of "dark" social intelligence, but it's not something we should celebrate, and it doesn't mean that a person is intelligent, thoughtful, knowledgeable, reflective, or inquisitive in other areas outside of their ability to sniff out and take advantage of an easy mark. It's like thinking a plant is globally "smart" because it can locate sources of sunlight.
So what you're saying is that listening to Matt's ideas is the equivalent of taking a gateway drug, and that you shouldn't do it? You're not going to learn anything if you resist opposing ideas. Go read up on the Socratic method and use it to grapple with Matt's and other ideas you disagree with. By the way, he isn't pointing out 'extreme' examples, not at all. The examples in the movie are the beating heart of the DEI movement, they're recurring themes, not extreme examples. :-)
The movie was fire I loved it
This is far from unbiased
Just regular coping and crying from weak confused souls
@@sethmilll matt walsh in a nutshell
This idea of a perfectly unbiased viewer is a myth. Everyone has bias. The only people alive who have no biases are literal vegetables. When Jessie says unbiased, she’s mocking y’all.
Bias generally means very little when trying to gauge anything, from the truthfulness of a headline to the quality of a movie. It can affect those, sure. But trying to claim that a bias is what caused a wrongful summation of something (either a misrepresentation of a piece of news or a poor review of a film) requires a more substantive explanation than just screeching “bias”
okay?
@sethmilll ikr she obviously was triggered by the film. Most of the first 5 minutes were her trashing matt and the daily wire. I came for a review of the movie, not for that. I haven’t seen anything of Matt’s before, i got recommended to see the movie from a friend. The film was actually really good i recommend watching it if you haven’t already. Her saying that the film was just wanting people to get matt walsh merch isn’t true cause for one there was no mention of any merch of his and two i didn’t even know there was merch until this video so…hah, i might even look into getting some now all thanks to her i appreciate it.
Movie was awesome! Highly recommend.
He is so much better than Sasha.
I absolutely love the disguise. It's inspired by the one gender ideology doctor that he disliked the most during his what is a woman movie
@@CiriOfcentra-eq4kq Is that why literally everyone thought that Walsh was a weirdo?
@@dariocarraresi1823 everybody who? Do you identify as the world now 🤣🤣🤣
@@CiriOfcentra-eq4kq I'm sorry, didn't you watch the movie?
The DEI workshop Walsh participated in? Walsh kept interrupting and apologizing, so eventually people recognized him. And then he somehow managed to get the police called on him.
The people in the pub? Everyone looked at him like he was just spouting nonsense. (Which he was - the stuff he said was more absurd than everything everyone else said. Combined.)
All those talk shows Walsh performed on? Yeah, NONE of those scenes was actually aired. Why? Either because someone recognized Walsh before the video could be aired, or because Walsh acted so weird that management just treated the video as garbage and threw it out.
Robin DiAngelo? Walsh kept insisting so much on reparations over and over (despite the fact that DiAngelo explicitly told him that's not how reparations work), that he ended up making his own black colleague "Ben" uncomfortable. DiAngelo eventually agreed to pay money just to get rid of Matt - but only after checking with Ben if he would have accepted the money.
The fake DEI workshop that Walsh created near the end of the documentary? Most of the audience walked out after Walsh said a few sentences.
A Masterpiece
"a film that's literally titled 'Am I a racist?'" - It's literally not titled that.
CONGRATULATIONS, JESSIE! Also, my deepest sympathies you watched this.
You should watch it. It's actually pretty funny.
How weak are you that watching a movie is some kind of epic undertaking?
Um, doesn't anybody think its odd that he's 'going undercover' and yet with somebody standing there filming the thing. Don't people realize you can hire actors to pretend they aren't acting?
Yes, but actors are professional fakers, while Wet Mulch fancies himself a crusader for truth and charismatic media personality. 🤣
He told them he was making a documentary, which he was, and they jumped at the chance to be filmed making fools of themselves.
Jessie? I think it may be Jackson
I totally forgot about Jeremy Jahn’s “Sound of Freedom” review until I saw his “Am I Racist” review… biiiiiiig self report there. Anyways great video as always, have some engagement!
When he did that Sound of Freedom review, I thought there's no way that he's that terminally offline. Now with this, he's fully exposed himself.
they are trying SO hard to penetrate the real world of entertainment but only proving their failure as screenwriters and moviemakers is only eclipsed by their failure as human beings.
with their bold money making strategy of making these "movies" as cheap as possible so they can say "technically we made a profit!"
The reviews and ticket sales would say otherwise
@@needaladyfriend1 nah. this is the best it'll do. they've already run through the audience they're capable of garnering. sort of like trump.
@@ThorneIdentity #1 Political Documentary in 20 years is pretty good, what's your bar?
@@davidstephens7399 Lol by what bar is this the #1 political documentary in 20 years?
If you were in good faith trying to disguise Matt Walsh, so he could Borat about and people genuinely not recognise him, how would you do it?
To me, the answer is obvious, and it's not give him a wig and a ponytail... it would be to shave his beard and maybe hair off.
Without that beard he'd be immediately unrecognisable. The fact he didn't do this says to me this whole concept is a scam (of course) and he lacked the stones to commit to the bit.
But he succeeded so it makes zero sense to try to armchair quarterback a play that already worked.
@@forsythejones2130 I disagree, I think its perfectly okay to armchair quarterback a play if you are an ideologue with no grasp on reality because of your marxist echo chamber.
@@JesseCuoi Many such cases. 😄
Small point but relevant to discussions on race: Kazakhstan is actually the most northern central Asian republic, just south of Russia. It’s a former Soviet republic with a history that’s more Eurasian than middle eastern, except for the influence of Islam
People are desperately coping in the comments since this documentary has been so successful lol
make believe is the MO
agreed.
Hon, Matt's Meat Riders ™ are all tf over the comment section.
Y'all need jobs.
🤣
@@beetlebob4675 at least the meat you think we ride is not attached to a "woman"
@@berndbernd3464
Transphobia. Bigotry. How usual for Matt and his ilk.🥱
"we DEFINITELY need to make a movie about how we are NOT racist!!" the "anti-DEI" grifters gettin all twisted ROFL
I wouldn't even know about the term "D.E.I." if adult toddlers didn't throw temper tantrums about it and then... release those tantrums into actual movie theaters while saying "look how smart and normal I am." Twisted is the only word
Wow! A review of the movie! By an actual critic! It’s almost like Matt enjoys being told he is not a competent actor, director, producer, documentarian, whatever he wants to be called. Love you Jessie. I enjoy that you’re able to put your personal opinions aside and genuinely review conservative media from a technical standpoint. Thinking about the earnest and not chronically online folks who might go to see this movie is a very appreciated viewpoint.
Spoilers for anyone who doesn’t know who MW and DW are: yes, Matt is a racist.
By what actual critic?
@@arjay9745 Jessie. She is an approved critic for Rotten Tomatoes. You can disagree with her opinions, but that doesn’t take away her place on the critics list. And while normally I wouldn’t respond to obvious rage bait, I’m happy to give the video some additional engagement.
@@goofballjar It's not that I disagree with Jesse's opinions. It's that this was a beginning-to-end, non-substantive ad hominem fest on Jesse's part. When this channel does an actual review, bringing up actual points from specific in-film contexts, then, and only then, I will accept the self-designation of 'reviewer'.
We must’ve watched different videos, because she references the film throughout. But again, thank you for responding and continuing to give Jessie additional engagement.
it's a Shockumentary - a word I just made up to emphasise that it's a movie that doesn't aim to document reality, but to enrage viewers over imagined culture war issues
It's what happens when you don't have the credentials/willingness to make a serious documentary, but you're also not funny enough to make a comedy.
People have been using that made up word for years now though
But it does document reality. These are real people and real organizations.
@libertyspikes666 a cherry-picked reality of the worst examples he could find.
@@libertyspikes666That’s like saying reality TV “documents reality”
No, it documents a staged and highly edited version of reality presented in bad faith and achieved by lying to and misleading people.
You missed the point entirely, min 8:57 the point is that DEI instructors are grifters by charging “30k” for a presentation and sit around on chairs or 5K for a dinner to be told that there is no fix. That is the point of the movie another DEI instructor was charging 10k+ and it was a whiteboard presentation. Then he went online and got certified. The point of that is that he went through the training and proves that anyone can be a DEI expert as he mentions in the movie.
Then about the Borat of the right, I think that only applies to the last scene were he pushes to see how far it can go.
And just another thing you claim that your video review had almost 1M views but the trailer has over 6M views and in the second week has grossed over 9M usd in the box office just to put things in to perspective.
Walsh was the one who charged 30k. He was the one who offered DiAngelo 10k-20k, unprompted. And every time he mentions a price tag, he never tells you if it's per person or per group.
Basically, Walsh makes sh!t up. Not to mention how much _he_ charges for _his_ speeches.
@@dariocarraresi1823 even if it is per group and he did not charge that I actually watched the movie he made 3k from people that enrolled in the DEI which technically he can because he has a certificate. And unprompted, she did those interviews, workshops she even mentioned that in the movie I guess it is just gaslighting time.
@@ignisproductions7791 No, I'm talking about one of the DEI workshops that appeared early on in the movie - the one who, according to Walsh, charged 30k. The Daily Wire staged that workshop. There's even a police report about it.
@@dariocarraresi1823 yes they staged all of them. Like the interview the race to dinner that is how they got the cameras in. Same as everyother movie like it that is how you have control of the film. What was not staged was the content.
Ngl reparations is a bullshit idea
Why?
Lord help me, I almost feel bad for M.W., because it doesn't seem like he does anything well. He failed upwards and desperately wants people to think of him as some kind of supremely talented "actor"/"raconteur" when he's just an average bearded dude.
That's an insult to the average white dude - Walsh is below average.
98% Audience Score...
@@pixelsheep8939 The argument from popularity is a logical fallacy. You lose.
@@oxman5571 "He doesn't do anything well" well 98% of Audience say otherwise. How is that a logical fallacy 😂
@pixelsheep8939 the only people who bothered to review it are people he panders to. He only has fans so long as he tells them what they want to hear ((look how quick they turned on him when he said not to drink raw milk))
Jessie, I just want to say, before watching this video, that I really appreciate the sub-20 min format.
Okay -- let's go girl!
Why does it always looks like as if Matt Walsh had a fake beard?
It's mostly just his inherent natural insincerity. Also it goes back too far under his chin to be that short.
I think it's because it's too tightly groomed. It doesn't fade at all into his cheeks, so it looks more like a hard line between his beard and his face. Which might be the "right way to do it"? But Matt would be more concerned with Doing It Right than choosing what looks better for him
Because he wants to not resemble Steve shives as much as possible
Bad CGI
As a black person almost every group shown in this movie was offensive and pandering and I honestly think these ppl think less of me and everyone that looks like me.
yeah i saw this movie and everyone was howling or cringing at those seminars. i cant imagine one black person would watch this movie and think those seminars are a good thing. say what you want about matt walsh, but that doesnt mean these scam artists he spoke to are good people.
@@nullakjg767 thats a fair opinion, but matt framing these seminars and the author of White Fragility as the be all and end all of anti-racist thought is really disingenuous when there are so many authors and thinkers out there and on the ground work being done.
@@llynxfyremusic There is no "be all and end all of anti-racist thought" because people arrive at these ideals by themselves as they are basic ideas like "don't pee on your food". Is like having an expert on how to eat from a plate, very redundant and pretentious as being against racism is a natural conclusion to most of the population, yet media profits by selling the idea that we are still in the 19 century and all minorities have shackles. And if you disagree you are evil
@@llynxfyremusic I have yet to see a version of it that's not condescending and regressive. I don't want white ppl to consider my race when dealing with me just my character. They would rather the world handle me with children's gloves on as if I'm fragile and need anything from them
Good because we do think less of you
Misnaming a film.... Of all the people to consistently get a name wrong....
Just saw the movie, it made a great point and it was hilarious. Dont be so angry about it, its just a reality you refuse to accept.
Just another Matt meat rider. Make sure to get a diaper beforehand, he loves those
Matt isn't going to f*** you
You didnt even listen to the video/review.
@@beetlebob4675 oh hey beetlebot, good to see you here again. 😂😂
@@Witdabear
It's not reciprocated
How can you say he “clips out of context” when u don’t know for sure?
Because one, the video editing of those scenes is terrible, with lots of cuts, different clips from different moments being mashed together etc;
And two, Jessie already saw similar crab from "What Is A Woman?"
@@dariocarraresi1823 that’s just an opinion though, no one can know for sure if it’s out of context editing except for the editors. And most of the clips need zero other context bcz they are so ridiculous
@@j3n1us Nah, knowing Walsh's history with these kinds of things, it's safe to assume that he erased important context. Like when in "What Is A Woman?" he censored any mention of the difference between gender and sex, arriving to the point of taking a professor's explanation (that Walsh himself requested) and turning it into an incomprehensible montage with deafening classical music.
@@dariocarraresi1823 so we know Kamala’s history of prosecuting minorities to the max for small charges. Does that mean that’s happening every time? One thing can happen in your eyes and still be different another time
@@j3n1us Let me guess: is that related to the "Harris jailed 1,500 people for marijuana possession" story?
Well done review. I agree that his edgy character makes it seem likes it's a movie for his own audience. The people that you need to convince are the ones on the political left, not the political right. The best way to do that is to be genuinely curious of the other side's views and to be respectful when talking with them. His edgy and rude behavior would, if nothing else, put left-leaning viewers on the defensive.
However, he did touch on systemic racism. One of the interviews in the film was with Wilfred Reilly who is a right-leaning political scientist. He shared some interesting perspectives on there being a "demand" for racism from the left that the "supply" can't keep up with, and he shared statistics to back up his arguments.
First time seeing your content. A traditionally conservative person, irrespective of my views on this current subject, have to say copyright striking your video is predatory and hypocritical to who Matt Walsh and the Dailyawire portray themselves to be. Good on you for creating a civil discourse and shame on the daily wire
Gosh what a trashh you are. This freek woke asshol just like you, he wants matt walsh arrested.
So gfys about the Civil discourse
You can't believe a word this guy says.
Tell that to the Olympic Committee, who also submitted a copyright strike. Clearly, mistakes were made. But, to quote Jessie, "it suits his narrative to play the victim".
All movie companies and content creators, left and right, strike any video that uses more than an 8-second clip of their content. Jesse knows this very well and is obviously being disingenuous.
I’m a black woman and it’s obvious that this is 100% biased. Why did you lie?
Where did she lie? Describe one single argument that Jessie used against the documentary.
@@dariocarraresi1823She said he parodies when he's actually just exposing these people. She also said he was kicked out several times but was only kicked out once, before he put on the disguise. Hope this helps!
@@Mopark25you’re talking to an NPC who’s butthurt that their favorite racist author DiAngelo got exposed. Don’t expect an intelligent response
@@StefunnyStrange cool, you proved black women can be wrong too
It's not like Matt Walshs movie was also.... biased
@@Mopark25 First of all, "he parodied" and "he exposed" aren't mutually exclusive. Walsh tried to go undercover in order to expose DEI instructors; the problem is that he chose to act like an unrealistic parody of a DEI activist. As a result, as Jessie said, many people were weirded out and suspicious.
Speaking of which: Walsh was kicked out by both the DEI group meeting (and he didn't present himself as Matt Walsh, he used fake names) and the DEI dinner.
Also, you know all those scenes where Walsh went to TV shows? Walsh managed to get inside the studios and do his comedy act, but NONE of those scenes were actually aired by the networks. Why? Because all of them smelled the fraud.
On top of that, when he goes to interview various civilians, you can see many of them recognize that he's a fraud, or even recognize him outright. The same thing happened when he tried to make a fake DEI course.
Him being repeatedly figured out as an alt-right crank in real time is the actual comedy in this movie, I don't know how he thought this was a performance to be proud of 😂😂😂
😂😂😂he was literally allowed to stand behind the wh0re cumala wtf are you smoking?
How many times did it happen?
@BP-or2iu At every "focus group" type meeting that he arranged or crashed. The video's long but it's worth it, the dudes a clown.
@@MrDeelightful Where’s this video?
@@BP-or2iu the one you're commenting on
Don't be surprised if he tries to block this video as well.
Also "The left hates free speech."
He’s blocking videos? ☠️
@@manga-1173 He tries to use a copyright strike to block videos.
@@2727rogers And they say the left are a bunch of snowflakes 🙄
@@manga-1173 The thing about snowflakes if you put enough of them together you will have a storm.
When it comes to the Conservative Party, there are so many unsettling and unloving things I have to read and watch. But what I’ve learned through my walk with Christ is that you have to have grace.
Grace is rated E for everyone and it is unlimited with Jesus. Even me, a horrible, rotten freaking sinner. I swear I lived my life apart from God and boy did I live it up. Though it lead me down a path of addiction, confusion, hatred of others, and love of self. You see a lot of holier than thou, self loving conservatives destroying the image of Christianity all over the news. I don’t identify with that. God is not a political party no matter what the media would like to tell you. Matt Walsh is not a representative of Christ.
Self-sacrificial love is not a phrase used a lot these days. The only one in human history that lived that out to a t (no pun intended) was Jesus Christ. Make no mistake, when He said in John 14:6 “Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” He wasn’t lying. Don’t believe me? Read the freaking Book. Read it for yourself and ask yourself if He was telling the truth. The day they find Jesus’ bones is the day I give up my Faith, but as it stands, Jesus of Nazareth died, was buried, and rose again on the third day. He ascended into Heaven in bodily form and is seated at the right hand of the Father. I hope to one day see Him so I can cry and just say thank you myself. I love you all so dearly, God bless you whoever is reading this ❤️✌️
I thought this movie was hilarious!
It was
Actually the movie is funny because the compassionate narcissist on the left are ridiculous.
One of the things that irritates me the most about this movie is that he really thought just putting on a wig the same color as his actual hair but long and tied back would make him into some kind of iconic sjw liberal Borat character but like he just looks like Matt Walsh with long hair
Bro calm down it ain’t that deep. 💀
@@Peterson1451??? Saying Matt Walsh didn't put in any effort to change his appearance is deep? 😂
@@UrOnTheWrongSide no it’s that he gets so pissed off about it. Like bruh that was the point, he wasn’t changing his appearance to much due to it being a satire movie.
@@Peterson1451 You mean how they said they were irritated that he thought he looked any different? Well, he did look stupid, It's not that deep. Lol Move on.
@@UrOnTheWrongSide ok?
Other than ad hominem attacks... review the film.
Hilarious, considering that the comment above didn't watch the review.
@@dariocarraresi1823 I did.
@@graemebuchan8142
You can't prove you did.
So.
Tit for tat, mf.
I feel like the review just completely missed the whole thing.
It does have that comedic satire however the people in the movie are real people that are not scripted.
this is gonna be the funniest documentary ever ! wohoo!!!!
Matt Walsh on Native Americans: Well they all fought in wars, so it was right for Europeans to commit genocide
Matt Walsh on slavery: Well every nation did it back then, so you can't unfairly blame the U.S. Also, slavery was very beneficial to the U.S.
Lunatic lghdtv like you always invents things like that in your head.
@@Themiddleearther1990 what are you talking about? These are things Matt has actually said, genius.
@@Themiddleearther1990 Those are positions Matt Walsh published on his own website and videos. Are you calling Matt Walsh a liar?
@@Themiddleearther1990Matt walsh has literally said this
@@PatrickWDunne It's a strawmen of what he said, but sure. I find the first one dubious, but the second one is just factually correct. In most non-western countries some degree of slavery is still the norm. Libia still has open air slave markets, half our stuff is manufactured by something like slaves in east Asia with minerals recycled by children on African garbage belts. It's also weird to blame the US for it because the US only existed since 1776 when most slaves were already taken there by the Brits and French a century before.
"unbiased" spends more than 20% of the video being biased.
Lmao what did you really expect ? The entire review is based on her world view. Any normal person is going to find this movie hilarious
@@zachanator2011 “Her”? What video are you commenting on? The dude in this video is no more feminine than a bag of recycling with lipstick lips drawn on it.
How about we stick to the documentary and not making a joke out of what being a woman (or movie critic) (or human being) is.
LOL! Both movies were spot on, and it hurts your feelings.
@@joshwilson2271 spot on about what ? That Matt Walsh is desperately begging for Hollywood's attention but can't seem to get it
@Joshwilson2271 🤭🫵 stinky
@@joshwilson2271 you're subbed to Asmongold? Eeewww
My problem with the concept of the movie is exactly that, its superficial and pandering. What was said about figures like the mainstream DEI profiteers has been said time and time again, free and legitimate criticism is out there.
A lot of Walshs criticism from the right towards the conservatives™️ gets drowned out by the hordes. I am far far from a progressive or post modernists but at least i will acknowledge that their world view isnt consistent.
Many of these discussions on these topics about gender/sexuality/race go over the heads of those in the mainstream, not exactly a new problem tho. If you remember Spencer versus Sargon, as Sargon now is now appropriating points from Spencer, but a big issue for the cons™️ is the fundamental denial of racial identity -and by extension denying sexual and gender identity- but straining the importance of ones ideas and opinions. Something something Martin Luther King JR Is infallible.
But also somehow forgetting that "whiteness" "white people" is inherently progressive and has a basis in modern liberalism. Its also why i believe the term "abolish whiteness" is actually triggering to them because of the lack of understanding the fundamental concept of where that term comes from.
I tried explaining this to some of my friends on the far right and many get it. But those who are lukewarm or reactionary dont. These cons dont get it, never have. They only started tagging on "but what about white people" because of the far right pressure put upon them.
Anyways good criticism. God Bless.
It's because your premises are bullshit and people notice your dishonesty and arrogance with relative ease.
I find it funny how much Matt's disguise looks like the "woke teacher" from Mr. Birchum. Also by DW of course. Dudes are overflowing with creativity.
Is it me, or does Matt Walsh's "disguise " make him look like a conservative Jarred Leto?
@@antheathetiefling8581 he reminds me more of an extra from "the last of the mohicans"
What conservatives look like his disguise?
If you have to ask the answer is most likely yes
Honestly ..i think if you ask yourself sincerely it may often be an attempt to improve yourself..
Asking yourself, is that gut feeling based in racism, why do i assume xy, why did I laugh at that joke...can be enlightning ;)
But in case of matt walsh? The answer is simply yes!
@@saraa.4295I think the word "sincerely" is how we know Matt doesn't meet the criteria. He'll saw off his own leg before he seriously reevaluates a single opinion of his own
@@Alkeeros absolutely!
Subverting Betteridge's law of headlines.
LOL. I bet you thought that was clever when you posted this… The irony is: the grifters you’re trying to defend are saying ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACIST.
So… what are you doing here, ya racist?
One of the criticism is that he interviews some of the most unhinged people. Since it's a comedy that has a goal at killing the business of grifters, he should do that.
Except that's not the goal of the movie, according to Walsh.
Dude. Chill
This movie... I don't need to watch it to know that the answer to the titular question is "yes". That is always the answer when someone asks that question. They can either whine about that fact or try to change.
This dude just hates the guy who made the movie. I didn’t know who Walsh was before he was making this movie, but I watched it because it looked hilarious. It’s actually very factual. I don’t think this guy really watched it. Probably just pulled clips.
It's done terrifically well. Jessie has sour grapes as usual. 😂😂
Completely biased
I actually ran across your review for this on rotton tomatoes yesterday! I was safe to assume you'd be making a video reviewing it. I'm so thankful for your bravery in sitting through the entire thing because I would not have been able to. Because if the cinama industry was a restaurant, watching this movie would be like paying to eat directly out of the dumpster. I need someone with a deeper ability of analysis and self awareness to actually tackle a serious question. Matt walsh just doesn't have the mental maturity to ask deep questions and actually analyze them. It's kinda his thing lol.
I was actually surprised at how good this movie is. Pretty funny actually
Technically speaking. Everybody is racist. You can never 100% turn away from bias. It just falls under a spectrum. Some people are more racist then others but ironically it is not a black or white situation
And in this short comment you have already demonstrated significantly more thought and insight into the subject than Matt Walsh bothered to.
Bias does not necessarily mean racism. Bias is the tendency to gravitate to someone familiar (I.e. someone like yourself). There is no malice in that, just natural self- centeredness.
An alternate armchair psychologist theory: Everyone is a Tribalist, of which racism is one kind of tribalism. Whichever group identity one ties their identity to, that is their Tribe. Everyone outside of it is Other and Beneath.
If true, it means that everyone CAN be racist, but they could also be Nationaist, Sexist, Globalist, or any sort of Ist. The wolf you feed helps determine it.
I think what people like Matt Walsh think is a different kind of racism. You can have bias and be naturally inclined to gravitate towards people similar to yourself, sure. That's probably what you're referring to. What the DW and its following believe is something more to the effect of "White is SUPERIOR to all other races BECAUSE of my whiteness." This isn't just something white conservatives think, either. This is the type of racism that is instilled into people all over the world in the form of extreme nationalism.
The issue is that society is structurally racist.
You can't avoid it without taking positive steps to learn.
That often means listening to marginalized people.
"It's just lazy and bad." Yep. The end.
As is the review.
please give a specific example from the movie that was lazy.
@@matthewjohnson6926 He's not answering that. Matt Walsh bad. Conservatives racist. Beep boop, I'm a fuckin' robot.
@@Ultranothingof course Matt Walsh won't answer why his movie is lazy.
@@pulpficti