The Truth About When Should You Take Social Security to Get The Most Out of Your Benefits

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 646

  • @almoemason
    @almoemason 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +290

    I retired and took my social security two years ago at age 62. Was it a good decision from a financial standpoint, no not even close. Am I in poor health ... no. I was just sick of working. I quit work and spent my entire Roth buying a boat, and that was not a good financial decision either. But they were the BEST two decisions I have made in my life. It's not always about the money. You are going to die, sooner or later. Have as much fun as you can, as long as you can.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Thank you for sharing your perspective on this!

    • @rubicon3416
      @rubicon3416 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      So are you living on SS only?

    • @almoemason
      @almoemason 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rubicon3416 No, I have a Navy pension and a state of Floriduh pension along with social security. I no longer have my Roth, I spent it.

    • @calebmelton5989
      @calebmelton5989 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      How much was your boat?

    • @almoemason
      @almoemason 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@calebmelton5989 $112k +$23K in Refurb and repair.

  • @OLDGUY7301
    @OLDGUY7301 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I waited till full. I'm still working as a residential contractor part-time, about 700 hours annually. I love it, I'll stop when I don't enjoy it anymore. I'm very healthy both parents are still breathing at 87 years old. Working until full allowed me to pay off my mortgage and become totally dept free.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds like you're in a great spot I. Life! Thank you for sharing!

    • @kellyname5733
      @kellyname5733 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Debt free?? Nobody in the US is "totally debt free". There are those pesky income tax's and In your case property tax's too.

    • @tonyl6385
      @tonyl6385 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wow God bless you. You're a power of example.

    • @reneb6702
      @reneb6702 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You've got to love what you're doing, which it seems you do, otherwise it's wearing the golden handcuffs while you're working. Love and light to you and yours. ❤

    • @aronsingletary
      @aronsingletary 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kellyname5733that's not debt, it is a recurring expense

  • @Lulu-kt6gr
    @Lulu-kt6gr ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Taking SS early doesn’t have to mean full retirement early. Perhaps one would like to cut down to part time and use the SS benefit as a means to support this transition. This video raises a lot of good questions. Each situation is unique.

  • @eduardooramaeddie4006
    @eduardooramaeddie4006 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I retired at 66and 4 months my age, social security had sent me the letter to confirm thank you

  • @CarpentersDaughter-dt6em
    @CarpentersDaughter-dt6em 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I was always able bodied, love construction work. I injured my back, figured it'll be ok, some ice, chiropractic appts, kept working in pain. Now I am totally messed up, degenerative disc & bone, pinched nerves, permanent bone marrow damage from chemo cancer 3x years ago has accelerated the bone issues. I am really afraid of the financial future. 😕 Social Security is less than the mortgage payment & they are fighting me on disability. As long as you're young & working you're fine but the minute you need help, despite paying into the system for decades, they want to kick you to the curb. 😢 That's a fact.
    Anyway...just found you guys & wanted to say thank you for putting this info together for us & presenting it as you do. Very helpful & useful. I was not even thinking of this stuff...planned to be working a long time as I loved it when I could physically do it. Well, I'm a subscriber now. You are very in depth with explaining everything. Keep up your good work.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So glad you found us. Thank you for tuning in and So sorry to hear about those struggles! That sounds so hard!

  • @chris-cx2rv
    @chris-cx2rv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    My dad started at 62 and was healthy. Dropped dead of heart attack at 65. You never know.

  • @susieq9186
    @susieq9186 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    They scared my Dad into taking social security at 62 = $600.00 monthly. He lived to age 89 and was sorry he took social security early.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Sorry to hear that. It is an important decision that can have lasting consequences. That's why we avoid the "always take it at __" talk because everyone is different. Thank you for watching!

    • @ellencox8415
      @ellencox8415 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yep. My grandmother AND mother both lived past 100. I don't know, but have heard being a centenarian is highly generic. Soooooo, I'm not retiring early because I'm basing retirement on 35 years starting at 70.

    • @DrSchor
      @DrSchor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      who were "they"

    • @kennyplay5982
      @kennyplay5982 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Who is "they" that scared him?

    • @susieq9186
      @susieq9186 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kennyplay5982 The person that did my Dad taxes along with people talking and articles/government saying social security was going to run out of money.

  • @bearcreekrealtyholdingsllc3953
    @bearcreekrealtyholdingsllc3953 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I just received my first social security check this month at age 62. I'm investing the money in A.I. and have already made money on my first investment. I figure I'd rather take it, invest it, and at least if I depart this earth prematurely, I'll have at least taken back some of my money.

  • @bobbytheblade2550
    @bobbytheblade2550 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    retired at age 50 and fell right into the routine phase: biking, pickleball, swimming, hiking and service work. That's it!
    I plan to take SS as early as possible, because I never counted on a dime. It's all just gravy! I married and raised 5 kids who all turned into achievers as well. I don't see any of them working past age 50 unless they choose to.
    I planned my retirement as a teen, and it worked! It's been 10 years, and LIFE IS WONDERFUL!
    The last thing any of us should do is be in a position where the government is a means of support.
    That's a prescription for poverty and dependence.

  • @jdjohnston1960
    @jdjohnston1960 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Glad to see a more sophisticated look at the breakeven analysis using the "opportunity cost" of holding on to one's personal investments longer. I did the same and used multiple rates to test different rates of return. The most reasonable rate of return for me pushed the breakeven date from age 78 to age 82. Knowing that, I chose to file as early as possible and use the government's money via Social Security rather than my own.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Appreciate you watching and sharing your experience. Few go into the detail you did for your calculation.

    • @kellyname5733
      @kellyname5733 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The Governments money 'is your money'. You contributed 'your money' to SS every month.

    • @gkerrhome
      @gkerrhome 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Did you consider the COLA against the larger benefit. I did and as you said, breakeven point was age 82. As my mom died at 84, and dad is still alive at 90, I am choosing to wait till 70.

    • @almoemason
      @almoemason 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Social Security IS your money, not the government's money. Even though it is a horrible retirement plan from a financial standpoint, you would do better in a standard savings account, it is a retirement plan that you and your employer(s) paid into.

    • @lorielundgren7169
      @lorielundgren7169 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Tsimy876 Amen!!

  • @charleslemaire8137
    @charleslemaire8137 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Regarding the timing about when to take SS, as I contemplate my decision to wait until 70, my main criteria was to maximize my spouses fixed income in a post-Charles world. But as I listen to your presentation I realize two concepts compete; I feel comfortable taking on investment risk now, but I am sure my wife would be very uncomfortable with it. So to avoid the risk of my passing or the loss of cognitive ability, I choose to hold out to the maximum. It is a TEAM sport!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      100%! You are wise to look at it as a team sport!

    • @charleslemaire8137
      @charleslemaire8137 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Theretirementnerds - we were born in 1952 and 1953. I started studying SS in my 50s and had the File & Suspend all planned out. That blew up in 2015 (I blame Alicia Munnell), but Restricted Application lasted just long enough for us. BTW, there is virtually no one left that qualifies for Restricted Application (spousal).
      In a couple more years, we will not have to talk about FRAs 66 vs 67. BTW the last person that could get FRA=65 is 85 today.
      In the example where the fellow filed and passed away, the spouse should have moved to a benefit that is 82.5% of his PIA; a safety net for spouses of selfish husbands.

    • @FordF250Tremor
      @FordF250Tremor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I waited and couldn’t be happier

    • @barbie3139
      @barbie3139 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You could also buy a large term insurance policy if you decide to retire earlier. Yes, its not cheap, but we only live so long...

    • @nwlady59
      @nwlady59 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I plan to retire at FR at 67. That is 2.5years from now. My benefit amount is way higher than both my x’s spousal portion. One x is on ssdi and the other is on ss. Both are over 65. If either x spouse dies before I take full retirement can I take their benefit as survivor benefits and then take my ss benefit in 2.5 years? Probably won’t happen, but wanted to know the process. Is a x survivor benefit the same amount as what their ss benefit was when they passed?

  • @pagosabob10
    @pagosabob10 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    When to take SS is a serious decision and an individual one as well. Some need to take it early for various reasons. Others, like me who took it at 62 and did not need to was ultimately it was not a good decision. Waiting til 70 which would have worked out as I am now 83 and in good health was a better decision. Add to that, I made a poor choice in investing and put all into what became a Ponzi Scheme! Crap! :-) Fortunately my second wife inherited more than I lost. Sometimes good fortune smiles on you. But that was just plain luck for us. Not all are so lucky.:-)

    • @pstoneking3418
      @pstoneking3418 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Everything was much cheaper 14 years ago when I retired at 62. People seem to think that cola makes up for the costs increases. It doesn't even come close. I wouldn't have retired at 62 if I wasn't debt free at that time. But I was and have never regretted retiring early. I also have a decent retirement, so it's different for each individuals circumstances.

    • @michellepalmer5283
      @michellepalmer5283 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'm 53 with a blood cancer. The average life span after diagnosis is 5 years. So if I make it to 62 I'm definitely going to take it. I will invest it into the S&P500 index which has averaged 10% return since it's inception. If I die that money goes to my beneficiaries. If I don't take it they get $0. Also with an average return of 10% the money will double and if I start pulling it out of my investment at 70, I will be making on average $300-$500 more than if I waited to pull that out from SS at 70. If I invested the money into a ROTH it won't be counted towards taxes.

  • @rubicon3416
    @rubicon3416 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    Leave it to government to make this so unbelievably complicated.

    • @karenwimberly9296
      @karenwimberly9296 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      INDEED!!! I'd love to see any one of our politicians live for 1 months on what we live on. Lol. Bet they couldn't do it!

    • @debrathornquist2465
      @debrathornquist2465 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Everything at the govt is complicated.

    • @Tsimy876
      @Tsimy876 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      In this case, it makes sense that it is complicated - and I for one am glad they thought through all the possibile eventualities. They did a great job of keeping SS viable and avoiding people gaming the system - unlike our tax laws that leave too many loopholes for the megarich to game the system so they pay less than us common folk. Let's face it, Life is complicated. And SS has been an amazing success at keeping Americans from abject poverty, complete dependence on others, and/or homelessness - as I have seen in 3rd World countries. My Mother would be in real trouble without her SS.
      Also folks, it is never too early to look into the costs and logistics of senior care facilities. In my Mom's case, roughly $3k for independent living, $6k for assisted living, and $10k+ for full nursing care.

  • @July.4.1776
    @July.4.1776 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The quality years you have left are a major factor. Everyday you delay is one less day you have to live healthy or at all. 🤔 I worked with a guy that kept saying he was going to work one more year. He never made that last year and died.

    • @CaedenV
      @CaedenV 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Most people who are motivated to work "just one more year" often aren't ready to retire in the first place. I work with a lot of elderly high income people, and the majority of them will die or be forced into retirement because they are too sick to work rather than getting to enjoy a real retirement. There are a few who genuinely love their work and are invested in the company... But most of them are high income with even higher expenses. Cars, homes, boats, spouces, vacations, supporting lifestyles of adult kids and grandkids, you name it, they are proof to me that income or social security are rarely the reason why people don't retire. They just have so many plates in the air that everything is riding on them to keep working and they feel too damn responsible for everyone else to ever give themselves a break.
      And that isn't all bad. They mean well by it. But social security is rarely the real reason to work or not work one more year. It is more the unwillingness to stop expanding lifestyle that keeps people in the rat race. If you can manage that, and pay off debts, then the cut in pay of social security would only be a minor consideration of taking it one year vs another.

  • @matt75hooper
    @matt75hooper ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Formula : 1. You are healthy. 2. You enjoy your work. 3. You collect at 70 so your wife receives your full benefit even if you drop dead at 70 and a day. She deserves to sleep comfortably at night when you're gone. I am head of household and this was my decision. Also- these videos never take into consideration your income from age 62 to 70. It's typically a good strong income $. The perfect launching pad into retirement.

    • @brucefredrickson9677
      @brucefredrickson9677 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes, having a lower earning spouse played largely into my decision to wait until age 70. My military pension will drop to 55% after my death so having the higher SS benefit is important to offset that drop in income. Great video.

    • @Lulu-kt6gr
      @Lulu-kt6gr ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brucefredrickson9677 very nice to think of your spouse.

    • @rene.s.s
      @rene.s.s ปีที่แล้ว

      My plan was also to go to 70, and I still might, because my wife will be 63 at that time. But she’s told me I’m not allowed to go before she’s close. She will have a really hard time even though everything will be set. Luckily, I can reduce my pension to 75% and she gets the same for life, she’ll have my high earning survivor benefit, and my maxed 401k (which we’re Roth Laddering near retirement), Mega Backdoor Roth, Roth IRAs, HSAs, and brokerage accounts and my company stocks.
      The new plan is to retire at 62, when she’s 55. My employer has retirement health coverage, which will also cover her in case of me passing before she turns 65. The aforementioned accounts should still cover us with 8 years of earlier retirement and all that time to enjoy our time together sooner.

    • @JohnJohn-wr1jo
      @JohnJohn-wr1jo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Matt, it's such a simple decision for obvious reasons. Unfortunately people either fail to plan or just as bad ignore the obvious and draw early and regret later in life.

    • @kelmike060404
      @kelmike060404 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm hoping you can answer this my husband is 6 years older. He's made significantly more than me if he files at 65 when do I file for spousal benefits when I turn 65 and he's 71?

  • @RobertSmith-gx3mi
    @RobertSmith-gx3mi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Buddy and I used to talk about this and debate it all the time.Sixty two, sixty five, sixty seven, seventy?
    He turned 61 in October of 2018, two weeks later he was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreanic cancer and died December 18, 2018.
    The correct answer will be sixty two in my case.

    • @BuddyDog9267
      @BuddyDog9267 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So SAD. SS makes no diff for dis sad case! 😢

  • @conniefoxx9813
    @conniefoxx9813 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm trying to figure out when to take my Social Security as well, so I truly appreciate this video. My spouse and I are both age 68, and he filed for his at 66 and 4 mos. I'm still working full time, so I was letting mine grow, but even letting mine grow to age 70 will still not equal his...it'll sill be short about a hundred bucks or so. He's dying, so I'm considering if I should go ahead and take mine now, then switch to his once he passes on. Ugh! So much math.

    • @PipersCreek
      @PipersCreek 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why not? Since you’re going to draw his sooner than later. Bank your’s or spend it while he can have some benefit from it.

    • @silvercharm9507
      @silvercharm9507 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So sorry for all you're going through.

  • @cynthiabrier2828
    @cynthiabrier2828 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    My dad worked until he was 70 and took SS at 65. He also had a pension, which he paid into all of his working life. He only received 2 years of his pension. Tragic.

  • @ron9665
    @ron9665 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    1:00:48 I think your best move is to plan on retiring without SS and then count it as icing on top when/if it does arrive. If I can set my retirement funds to create a situation in which my projected needs are covered (and possibly some of my wants too) then at least I am not playing the "I can probably skip my meds this month because I have hit the Medicare doughnut hole.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hoping for the same freedom when the time comes. Donut hole goes away in 2025 😊

  • @jamestamu83
    @jamestamu83 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    This channel is a great source of information for folks approaching retirement. My wife and I are new subscribers. Thanks for the well-presented, clear, and not overlaying complicated explanation of the basics.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much, James! Appreciate you spending time with us!
      We just released a new video (seconds ago) on Social Security taxability that you may enjoy :)
      th-cam.com/video/ZetbFdEqi2A/w-d-xo.html

  • @marykwart9331
    @marykwart9331 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I had to get SS at 62 because I retired under a firefighter retirement system at age 55 and got a retirement supplement that disappeared at age 62.

  • @uninsurable9028
    @uninsurable9028 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Now that the kids are grown and I don’t have to rush home to cook dinner or drive someone to soccer, working is actually enjoyable. Plus I can work from home. And I get paid while I’m on vacation. I see no reason to retire- and definitely not until I’m 67 or 70.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for watching and sharing your thoughts!

    • @justinlanglais9825
      @justinlanglais9825 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm in the same situation.... kids gone, working from home at a job I like.... I'm looking at 67 or 67-1/2 for retirement and SS...

    • @lesadelisi9385
      @lesadelisi9385 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If your second spouse has died, can you file for your ex-spouse’s (first spouse’s) benefits if their PIA is larger than second’s spouse’s?

  • @Fold-p5c
    @Fold-p5c ปีที่แล้ว +28

    This is so informative man. I also listened to the episode on Roth vs traditional. Please keep it up. Would love more episodes like this with this guy. It's seriously wildly valuable.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you so much! Recording a new one next week 🙂

    • @Fold-p5c
      @Fold-p5c ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @90DaysFromRetirement in case you were wondering, none of this is TOO DETAILED! The detail and tangents are so appreciated I can't even express it. Please keep going hard with the substance and detail.

    • @beverleyboateng566
      @beverleyboateng566 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I knew nothing about all this until I started listening to this man, he breaks everything down to it’s smallest denominator, thanks mr. social security explainer: please continue this great teaching…as we continue learning and growing!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@beverleyboateng566 thank you so much for spending time with us! And we are so glad this is helpful!!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Fold-p5c for some reason, TH-cam just showed us this comment even though it is 3 weeks old. Appreciate you saying this! Means so much to us and helps validate our hope to keep these moving forward. Thank you!!

  • @flowersfrom7311
    @flowersfrom7311 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It was so helpful!!!
    I wouldn't be surprised if the combined benefit of this show to all the listeners who follow the advice to be in the millions of dollars.
    But there's another important consideration in planning for social security - taxes.

  • @virginiagilmour4912
    @virginiagilmour4912 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I’m so grateful to have found Eric’s channel, The Retirement Nerds. Such incredibly helpful information. Thank you! I recommend you to all of my friends and family.

  • @timmytempleton2488
    @timmytempleton2488 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Retirement doesn't necessarily mean not working. Tomorrow is never guaranteed . I'm drawing mine at 62.

    • @projectkj7643
      @projectkj7643 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Same!

    • @Nunyabizness_
      @Nunyabizness_ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same here! You get to collect longer that way and you can still make a little over 22,000 a year.

    • @skepticalmechanic
      @skepticalmechanic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Everyone is different…

    • @karlatingley8380
      @karlatingley8380 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's what I did when my husband passed away. Even though I wasn't working at the time, I did work my whole life...but needed the money. Now working part time and I'm ok.

  • @MElife4ME
    @MElife4ME ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Outstanding content. So many variables and SS decisions should be made on an individual by individual, family by family basis. The “growth” discussion as it relates to break even is NEVER discussed.
    Some other considerations are DAC benefits, caregiver benefits, and the family maximum can add even more complexity.
    I appreciate knowing there are firms out there who can consider all factors in helping to advise in this decision making. We most likely will be contacting you for a more in-depth review

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for watching and for leaving such a nice comment! We'd be honored to help in any way we can

  • @Bob-yh7ir
    @Bob-yh7ir ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Planned without SS in the mix. We will get it and when I turn my SS on alone will more than cover all our household expenses and some fun. So investments will just be gravy train baby !

  • @Spawny500
    @Spawny500 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If you can still work, and don't mind it, would delay until full retirement age(FRA). That way, you can make a lot more $$$ working from age 62-66, than not, due to the SSA earnings cap. When you finally begin drawing at FRA, you'll have the advantage of greater savings & greater security, having earned more income from age 62-66. If desired, you'll also be able to continue working without an earnings cap, now that you have reached full retirement age. There is no one size fits all. Seek advice for your own situations.

  • @katydid2k
    @katydid2k ปีที่แล้ว +16

    FANTASTIC conversation, thank you!! I appreciate your immense knowledge and great clarity on all these subjects.

  • @stevenmcnevin4031
    @stevenmcnevin4031 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I appreciate the information given freely and being married i learned some decisions we might make when we retire. Being in are 50's were not ready to retire anytime soon.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for watching! It's better to be too early than too late :)

  • @rrr574
    @rrr574 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I am 66 I. In great health love working and making incredible money. I am waiting til 70 . No reason to take it now..

    • @BitsyBee
      @BitsyBee 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      A reason to take it at my full retirement age (66 and 2/3), but before age 70, is that I have those working years until age 70 to save or invest the social security payments I don't yet need to live on. I did the math, and it would take me until age 86 to make up the difference between the FRA payment and waiting to take the age 70 payment. Most people in my family die at 83- 85. Even if I live to 100, there is a lost opportunity cost to spend the money at an age I can enjoy it, or lost interest which would be thousands.

    • @donnazukadley7300
      @donnazukadley7300 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Goodie good for YOU. I am a vacc1ne mandated aka medically gRaped nurse Who worked frontline during C0vid while many made MORE THAN ME WHILE SITTING HOME SAFE AND SOUND DOING ... NOTHING.. who is so ill every day of my life trying to still make a living.

    • @peterozzo1754
      @peterozzo1754 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      RE: Spousal Benefit. My wife and I plan for her to wait until 70 (long genes) and I would claim at FRA. If she files for spousal on my benefit, does that STOP her clock to get to 70 for her delayed benefit?

  • @Robs63
    @Robs63 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am on survivor benefits I took at 60 job closed after working there over 30 years as a bus driver Because Covid now I was going on 60 But when I weighed my options he made way more than me even if I waited til my full retirement age I still would not have made out even left mine on table period and living off my Ex’s never look back everything is just about paid am waiting on housing and no dept But took side hustle am loving it only couple hours a day not real early to be to work plenty time to rest and get off in three hours at almost 64 love it 😊 And love what I do 😊

  • @cdaz55
    @cdaz55 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    If you continue to work while collecting social security why does the government continue to withhold social security and Medicare from your paycheck ?

    • @lorielundgren7169
      @lorielundgren7169 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wages (money earned from a job) are always subject to taxes...some things never change. However, you aren't paying social security taxes on your social security income. Make sense?

  • @rtaticek61
    @rtaticek61 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Great presentation on the "when to take SS..." topic. One of the few I have seen that suggests you need to look at more than getting the "max" from SS based on longevity. You may be putting yourself at greater sequence of return risk or missing out on portfolio growth opportunity by waiting. As someone who retired early (stopped working) before 62 I have been analyzing at it more in terms of cash flow and portfolio appreciation than "maximizing" SS amount. I have found the New Retirement application helpful to look at SS scenarios in conjunction with expense and portfolio projections.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for watching and so glad it was useful. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts!

  • @maviskirsch2235
    @maviskirsch2235 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is so timely and great. A lot of financial advisors do not explain this part of the equation. Very straightforward and concise.
    He's is so knowledgeable because of this information I'm heading down to SS office this week.
    Thanks a lot.

  • @kennyplay5982
    @kennyplay5982 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Im gonna try to go for 125%

  • @raroque12
    @raroque12 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I love the way you guys have the opposite way to treat your hair… one has the perfect comb with jel and the other one looks like just got out of bed… nice 😊!

  • @rayosullivan4398
    @rayosullivan4398 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Take it, don't take it, take it as soon as you can,you should wait, never wait take it now,take at 62, but should wait till 67, maybe wait till 70, but 62 is better HOLY CHIT i don't think anyone really knows.

  • @Valorie_in_the_kitchen
    @Valorie_in_the_kitchen 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I wish the tax cap would go away. I was in the earning bracket for a few years where my social security tax ended. It wouldn’t have bothered me a bit to pay on the entire year pay.

  • @mixville2
    @mixville2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your videos are fabulous and incredibly clear and informative. No hyperventilating or trying to push an agenda, which I pick up from most other YT videos of this type. Just from the few I've watched yesterday and today, I've learned a great deal - and I think I was already pretty well-informed. Great work and thanks.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much! Appreciate you taking the time to watch and leave this comment 😊

  • @WigsGlam
    @WigsGlam 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awsome Information!!!! I will turn 65 in January and I'm trying to learn about Medicare and this information is amazing! I might need a wealth advisor, the first time in my life😊

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thabk you for watching! Zacc and his team are amazing!

    • @WigsGlam
      @WigsGlam 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Theretirementnerds i'm definitely going to contact them!!!! I've listened to both of you guys twice today all the way from beginning to end

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@WigsGlam I'm sorry you have to hear my voice so much! Zacc's is pleasant though and he is so sharp!

    • @WigsGlam
      @WigsGlam 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Theretirementnerds I think you are both very brilliant in your own fields!!!! And neither one of you are bad on the eyes or maybe I need to get mine checked👵🏻👵🏻👵🏻 which makes it much easier to listen to you

  • @janereinhardt4715
    @janereinhardt4715 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I retired 19 years before my FRA, which will be 67. I may wait until i am 68, 69 or 70 though to start.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Congratulations on such an early retirement!

  • @cavapoo23
    @cavapoo23 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm pretty sure that Zacc can accomplish accounting for the opportunity cost of delaying filing (as it relates to investor risk tolerance), by setting up the Excel sheet as he described, with inflation adjusted cash flows for different start dates, then using the "net present value" function to sum the cash flows. The "rate" in the NPV function would correspond to the expected return of the assets outside of S.S. When the net present values are equal for different start dates, that is the break even age. There is a little bit more excel work to automate it, but guessing its well within his wheelhouse (or feel free to reach out and I'll share it, I think I'll build it into my model. I appreciate the podcast, it was very informative).

  • @timothythompson4036
    @timothythompson4036 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have life insurance, so when I die my wife gets the life insurance and my SS survivor benefit. I am really glad I invested in life insurance when I was younger. It makes waiting to age 67 to collect SS much easier.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Life insurance is important! Thank you for sharing!

  • @philbrennaman4572
    @philbrennaman4572 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What is the video that talks about taxing SS? You mentioned it at the 1:10 mark, and said the video is going crazy right now. Just came across your channel, and perfect timing, I retire in one year. Love all the videos I have seen, thanks

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!
      Here is the SS taxation video:
      th-cam.com/video/-NlSlZeoRn4/w-d-xo.html
      It is for 2023. We will make another for 2024 soon.

  • @karenroberts7083
    @karenroberts7083 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Im loving all of this information, however I’m not hearing anything if you are single and have always been. Most of this is about survivor or spousal benefits. Did i miss something?

  • @attheworktable
    @attheworktable 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    this entire series needs more "Likes"

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Appreciate you saying this! Thank you so much!

    • @attheworktable
      @attheworktable 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I learned so much from this series of videos.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@attheworktable did you see the new one released yesterday? Zacc did a remarkable job in that one as well.
      th-cam.com/video/flCDgSy25e0/w-d-xo.html

  • @colleenwebster8762
    @colleenwebster8762 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was so insightful. Especially the point on considering taking money from our investments and losing that interest versus taking ss early. We had not thought of that before.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for watching, and we're so glad to hear it was helpful!

    • @zaccarycall
      @zaccarycall 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We call it the difference between the straight break even and the break even with lost growth. We haven’t found calculators/tools that account for it. We had to build them! Wild how all this fits together right?

  • @jgibbs6159
    @jgibbs6159 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You should NEVER wait until 70 unless money is the only priority - imo. Life expectancy for males now who are age 62 is about 83. Meaning, statistically if you waited until 70 you only have 13 years of the full benefit which is capped at around $5k a month or 60k a year. at 67 its roughly $3,900, so.... you are only earning 8% on 40-56k a year for 3 years. The maximum benefits of $60k a year for 13 years is 780k. The rough estimate for max benefit at 62 is $2,700 x 21 years is $680,000 or just $5k less a year over the same period. In other words, you pay yourself to retire earlier - if you can swing it. If you're checking out at 83, the question is - are you taking some of it with you, ie., enjoyed your last years here, or passing it all on to your heirs/spouse. Lastly, when SSA changes come - and they are for sure coming - who do you think they will go after first for savings? The people at the $2,700 a month level or those at the $5,000 a month? Mathematically, waiting until 70 is the optimal economic choice, but who wants to work for 50+ years and only have 13 years to relax? Plus, there is a HUGE difference between how your body works at 62 and 70. Love the educational content though - best Iv'e seen so far.

    • @donnazukadley7300
      @donnazukadley7300 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have worked as a nurse for 35 YEARS and only have 2,000 SS. I HAD ENDANGERED MY LIFE DURING C0VID AND MISSED SO MANY YEARS of spending time with family band HOLIDAYS AND DROVE THRU RAINSTORMS and SNOWSTORMS and HURRICANES. HOW IS THIS FAIR?

    • @dianeaj4663
      @dianeaj4663 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The NEVER in your statement lost me, particularly when you say unless money is the only priority. Your continued statement implies you equate "retirement" with taking SS and that there are no other investments to tie one over unless they take SS. Have you not learned absolutes are typically incorrect?

    • @karenvanorden8206
      @karenvanorden8206 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jgibbs6159 that's one thing they never talk about ---you're guaranteed to be healthier at 62 than at 70.
      And you would be amazed at how much of your money can get wiped out by a nursing home at 85.

  • @KotoriOnWheels
    @KotoriOnWheels 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We need to figure in how much we can make in wages while retired too, right?
    And the penalties for making too much and what happens to your benefits.

  • @guycorrigan1174
    @guycorrigan1174 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A thought on this is that social security is not inheritable. If you are drawing down assets to maximize your SS payment, you are reducing your legacy to your spouse or family members.....if that is a consideration for you.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excellent thought!
      For a spouse, SS benefits are (sort of) inheritable through a survivor benefit. There is a story in there around this where the spouse takes SS early at 62, dies shortly after, and now the spouse is left with the smaller SS benefit rather than the full PIA.
      In this video, we touch on drawing SS early but needing other assets to cover and how that can have consequences.
      th-cam.com/video/ZetbFdEqi2A/w-d-xo.html
      Thank you for adding that!

  • @debrahazelwood623
    @debrahazelwood623 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am very grateful for all the information you have shared thank you

  • @Savannah-ed4rv
    @Savannah-ed4rv ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm 63 on SSDI and a widow who was the higher wage earner. I was told when my SSDI converts at age 67, my FRA, I should suspend my own benefit to let it grow until the age of 70. Then during this time I was told I could not take a Survivor benefit because I had been on disability but that would give me three years without any income in order to end up with a higher Social Security payment on my own record. Now I'm wondering if I should somehow get off disability and claim my Survivor benefit even though it's lower than what I'm getting now. I have asked several so-called experts I Social Security like you and I'm not really getting clarification from what a computer program told me to do. My understanding is that the restricted applications are still available for widows, but the company who ran the program says that that is not the case! Can you please help me with this because the days are taking away and I don't know what the best strategy really would be.

  • @FrankBatistaElJibaro
    @FrankBatistaElJibaro 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    @90 Days From Retirement
    Thank you for your video. I am still confused because my situation is very rare.
    My wife is 5 years older than I am.
    I want to take Social Security at 67. She would be 72 at that time.
    She is ok with retiring at any age after 62 so when, should she take hers and when should she take spousal?
    My PIA is 2924, hers is 1108, both at 67.
    Or can you please do a video where the lower earning spousal benefit spouse is older? I've never seen anyone cover that nuance.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi Frank! Great comment. You are always free to send me an email to erik@90daysfromretirement.com and I'll connect you with Zacc's team. It is no cost to have a conversation with them and they can give you some direction and a plan around your circumstances

  • @davidfolts5893
    @davidfolts5893 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for the great content, gentlemen! Yesterday, I read that only about 4% of people maximize their Social Security benefits, so there is much room for improvement.😀

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you so much for watching David!
      I always think of you when the more financial videos are published because I know you have a brilliant financial mind. Appreciate you!

    • @davidfolts5893
      @davidfolts5893 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Theretirementnerds Thank you, that is very kind of you to say.

  • @deanworks9252
    @deanworks9252 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’m dual entitled. I’m taking survivors benefits at 60. And then switch to my SS at age 70. I have looked at over and over. This is the only thing that makes sense.

    • @gmharris2010
      @gmharris2010 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Keep in mind there are income cap limitations on earnings under FRA and if under FRA you need to be mindful of the tax bracket on SS

  • @JaniceHylton
    @JaniceHylton 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My husband will take at 70.
    I will take it at 62.
    I will retire at 55.
    We will have lifetime health insurance

  • @margaretnorris5840
    @margaretnorris5840 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thank you for explaining this complicated stuff.

  • @juliebee61
    @juliebee61 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My husband is 20 yrs older than I. He has pension benefits and SS. I'm not sure when i should file since my FRA is 67 and ill be 62 this year. I think my higher amount would be based on his benefit. Does it make sense for me to file sooner or later??

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Julie, thank you for leaving this comment! There's still quite a bit that would go into that decision. Would you mind sending me an email to erik@90daysfromretirement.com and we can take a closer look? It will never cost you anything to chat with us about SS - just want to be clear on that up front.

  • @SylviaDeluna-j1p
    @SylviaDeluna-j1p 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What about a single person . When should i take SS. Im 63 ... my work is physical and I'm tired .. I'm a stylist for 43 yrs don't know if i can make it to 67 . Will it be ok to start at 65 ?

  • @kellymabon6044
    @kellymabon6044 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I retired early, 61, with a pension. If I wait until full retirement age, 67, my benefit is larger than my x-husband who took his benefit at 62. Can I claim on his now & get my full benefit later?

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Kelly, unfortunately, it doesn't work like that anymore. If you file now, SS will give you the larger of the two benefits. You get a percentage of his, not the full benefit (unless he is deceased). If you do take before FRA, either yours or a spousal, your benefit doesn't continue to grow outside the annual Cost of Living Adjustment. Hope that helps!

  • @ron9665
    @ron9665 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Most money sites seem to suggest 15% - 25% (or more) to create an acceptable retirement situation. If people could retain their 12.4% that SS extracts from them and add the aforementioned 15% - 25% they could end up investing as high as 37.4% of their gross each year in something they could have a little more confidence in. Averaging $75k for their work years (20 - 65) at just 7% could net them $41,079 / month for a 30 year retirement if their rate drops to 4% after retiring.

  • @patricianebe9885
    @patricianebe9885 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    NEW
    ???? Earlier you mentioned something about a woman who had been married more than once. I've been twice. I divorced my 1st husband and then he died about 4 years ago and I have been married to my 2nd husband for 15 years. I'm pretty sure my 1st husband made more money. Can I still claim survivors benefits? My benefits are in medical review right now and I'm afraid of them being taken away and I need them because I have seizures and I can't work. ???

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      2 things. Your first marriage had to have lasted at least 10 years. 2nd, you would need to have remarried your 2nd husband after 60 to be entitled to the survivor from the first husband. Unless your current marriage ends in divorce or death.

    • @karenwimberly9296
      @karenwimberly9296 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In Blind to Billionaire, He just covered this very question. If you were married to your 1st husband for 10 years or longer, the answer is yes, you can! Go for it, girlfriend!

    • @debrathornquist2465
      @debrathornquist2465 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My mom has a state retirement benefit of about $2,100.00 pension. Born in 1942. Applied for social security at 62. And has barely paid in social security. She gets a piddly amount of $400.00 a month. When she retired her husband was alive. He was drawing social security much higher than hers. Can she get a survivor benefit?

    • @debrathornquist2465
      @debrathornquist2465 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I forgot to add her first marriage was to my dad for 11 years he is deceased. So can she get his survivor benefit. But not the second husbands, because she married him before age 60? ?

  • @July.4.1776
    @July.4.1776 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Moral of the story everyone’s situation will be different. Some say draw down your retirement accounts first. Some say take social security @ 62 and save the invested assets. Depends on what you would like to leave after death.

    • @pagosabob10
      @pagosabob10 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, and it depends on investing wisely.

  • @richardsilver8485
    @richardsilver8485 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow!! Enjoyed the episode. Lots of great content and I appreciated your respect of the others privacy. That is quite the galley.

  • @Beadgcfb
    @Beadgcfb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am 60 and the higher earner (3:1 benefit difference), my wife is 63. I'll be 67 when she is 70. Good health and longevity in the genes. Assuming our retirement planning prioritizes maximizing lifetime SS benefits and the survivor benefit, at which ages should we each file?

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are several other factors in there including the other assets from which you can pull and how long you plan on working.
      My email is erik@theretirementnerds.com
      Shoot me an email with the state you live in and we can set up something to go into your specific situation. We never charge anything for Social Security help, conversations, guidance, etc.

  • @eugeniahutiu
    @eugeniahutiu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you verry much!Enormous help with details you have given.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So glad it's helpful! Thank you for watching!

  • @puravida5683
    @puravida5683 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Some things that are not mentioned enough to seniors! The double taxation of social security. And, the social security tax table has not been adjusted for inflation in decades. Thus, more and more seniors are moved into a taxable or higher tax table. Politicians have been giving seniors lip service for decades, rolling out bills they know won't pass, or just focusing on keeping social security solvent. What they are not telling seniors, social security will be solvent, via The Federal Reserve currency printer. And, that seniors will continue having reduced purchasing power, via the low manulipated annual COLA amounts.

  • @dinamedina9005
    @dinamedina9005 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is there is a difference starting my social security within Puerto Rico versus the states?
    I guess my concern is that if I will loose money by applying from being in P.R. After I worked all my life in the states

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. No difference. Puerto Rico is a US territory and as long as you've paid into the SS system, you get your benefits. Sorry it took so long to respond!

    • @robertwatts6313
      @robertwatts6313 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@dinamedina9005 There should be no difference regardless of where you live, speaking as an expat

  • @Elena-rt9yu
    @Elena-rt9yu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wow wow wow……so much to learn, thank u, for this valuable information.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So glad it's helpful! Thank you for spending time with us!

  • @ericgold3840
    @ericgold3840 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fantastic video.
    One reason to delay not mentioned: as part of a Roth conversion strategy

  • @mfuntanilla7476
    @mfuntanilla7476 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What about taxes and RMDs ? If getting SS early throws you into a higher tax bracket when you have to do RMDs because your investments grew and your Medicare premiums go up, should that also be factored in ?

  • @rhondaswedeen8868
    @rhondaswedeen8868 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You guys are SO awesome. Great, clear info and fun together. Thx very much for all you both do.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for spending time with us!

  • @mikeflair6800
    @mikeflair6800 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The only absolute rule is you. What are your personal circumstances? In my case, I married a younger woman with minor children. For the children to receive social security benefits based upon my work record (my PIA Earnings), I would have to be physically receiving mine, not just have earned, for their benefit to be physically turned on. I physically turned mine on at 62, as early as I could, as the minor benefits will end at 18. We are in a family max situation.

  • @carolinapascua3672
    @carolinapascua3672 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I took it at 62 and was glad I did it although I continued working and gets taxed too much and there were times SSS stops it because it gets beyond the capped allowed. But I like to work but this is 100% commission on a W2 but I love what I do.

    • @petermandel2552
      @petermandel2552 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think you might be better off halting ss and pay it back to get a higher return later. Not sure its even possible.

  • @LeslieNicole
    @LeslieNicole ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is very comprehensive and generous advice on SS, but be sure to look at the video breakdown of topics. I watched an hour of info that didn’t really pertain to me because this is highly targeted to couples (and divorced / survivor) strategies and I am not eligible for spousal or survivor benefits. I guess it’s interesting to know, but doesn’t pertain to me. The advice on not worrying about wether SS will go away was helpful. I’m 62 and was wondering if I should take retirement early - partially for this reason.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much for watching and sharing these thoughts!

    • @kevinweidner9981
      @kevinweidner9981 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Take your social security when you turn that special age determined by your birth year. Keep working and bank the SS. At the rate we are going SS may not be around in your later years and BAM you waited and waited and say it’s gone? You missed the boat. Our hard working generation is dying off and the entitled brats we raised aren’t working like we did, so people aren’t paying into the system and now it’s dwindling away. Going going, gone!

  • @azogues725
    @azogues725 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is very informative - thank you. It would have helped me if the language used were more distinctive, such as Person 1 and Person 2 (i.e. spouses, whether married or divorced or alive or deceased). The informative sentences were often "you you you you.... " or then "spouse spouse spouse"... I couldn't refer back fast enough to understand which person you were talking about, and whether or not I myself was the "You" or "the spouse". Thank you.

  • @janinelargent9220
    @janinelargent9220 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think the most wicked fact is not that they make full retirement age older and older or even that they reduce the payment for early retirement but that they so significantly limit the amount you can earn in retirement

  • @redcloud5813
    @redcloud5813 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Doubtful. Historical stock market returns (s&p) are about 7.5%. Every year you delay taking SS it raises about 8%.

  • @marilynh5487
    @marilynh5487 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My 1st has always been now retired at 43 from the Postal Service Immediate Annuity. Army Reserve at 38, finally at 60, check started. Social Security 62. I want my money 💰 now.
    My sister die at 35 in a car accident 😢.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So sorry to hear about your sister 😢

  • @Jenny40090
    @Jenny40090 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am going to be 67 in June 2024 . I will have
    Cal Per benefits plan . My question is when will be best time to retire? I want to retire soon .

  • @jus4kelley
    @jus4kelley 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maybe I missed it, but I did not hear you mention anything about the Windfall provision (deduction) for certain pensions (I’m a teacher)…My calculations show that I can only get 45% of my benefit. Can you suggest another video for that deduction?

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure can 🙂
      Here is a video on those:
      th-cam.com/video/n4aHC6xnFFM/w-d-xo.html

  • @gillyOO7
    @gillyOO7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sarasota Tim has all the answers if you want to live in a camper down south.
    With Covid and shit goin down with govt seems to make sense for all to take it at 62

  • @GaryBacon-cf6dg
    @GaryBacon-cf6dg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was under the impression that the spouse will always get 100% of their own benefit and then receive the difference up to what they would get as a spousal benefit.

  • @lindamyers951
    @lindamyers951 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No worries you look handsome. Thank you for your advice

  • @masterlee4370
    @masterlee4370 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What an awesome video. I wish you could have touched on the subject of someone getting a state retirement and then when they start collecting social security too how it will affect it. But with that being said there was so much information in this video. Zach is really awesome with his knowledge and down to Earth speaking. Utah has some really awesome human beings! Great Job!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Zacc is awesome and is such a valuable wealth of knowledge.
      In regards to your state retirement, would this video help? It talks about the WEP and GPO penalties associated with those who work for a state entity that does not contribute to the Social Security side of FICA taxes and instead, offers the pension?
      th-cam.com/video/n4aHC6xnFFM/w-d-xo.html
      Let me know if it is something else you'd like us to tackle and I'm sure we can put something together.
      Appreciate you!

    • @masterlee4370
      @masterlee4370 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had watched this video once before but I don't think I was serious enough in listening to it. This time I was. I went on the SSA Site with the WEP Calculator. I put in my wife's salary for the 10 years they took out social security. She made from 80k to a 100k. I just sort of guessed at it. I didn't see anywhere for the amount to put in for her state retirement. It came out to $1.218 a month. Would that be the amount or would I need to subtract that $547 from it, Thanks for your help.@@Theretirementnerds

  • @mikewatch1487
    @mikewatch1487 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Makes no since to touch your investments if you have over $500,000 and instead take SS early and let your investments grow even more.

    • @rayzerot
      @rayzerot ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Except you'll never find a better investment than Social Security. It's the stuff investors dream of. 8% *guaranteed* annual returns? Inflation adjusted every year? Minimum 15% (usually more) of the income tax free?? Social Security is the best investment around. Spend the rest of your money first

    • @LG123ABC
      @LG123ABC ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rayzerot Nope, I'm hanging onto mine as long as possible. I hope to do WAY better than 8%.

    • @rubicon3416
      @rubicon3416 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@LG123ABC- Maybe you will, maybe you won't. We could have a prolonged 1970's scenario where you lose for a decade.

    • @badwater
      @badwater 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rayzerot That's my plan... retire at 65 and live off 401(k) money (and part time job... because I've got to do something) and delay Social Security until 70.

  • @dperreno
    @dperreno 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just a comment - I'm assuming that you meant to say that people would be earning a "return" on their IRA/401K portfolios, not just interest. "Interest" is a specific type of payment and does not include appreciation in the value of the underlying assets.

  • @Wonderland41
    @Wonderland41 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, you can take a divorced spouse benefit if you remarried, if your later marriage ended by annulment, divorce, or death.

  • @irpain8617
    @irpain8617 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I delayed until 68 to provide delayed credits to the surviving spouse. That was the age my wife reached her full retirement age. I feel what would have been drawn from my portfolio will generate far more income than the 2 years of delayed credits given up by not waiting till 70. I look at Social Security as insurance against out living your money...!!

  • @pattylagasse
    @pattylagasse 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If I take SS at 62 and my husband is getting his full amount, you mentioned I could get some of his benefits, is this possible if he’s alive first, also does what I get from him does that take it away from the amount he’s now getting? Thank you

  • @zubazzkodine1643
    @zubazzkodine1643 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Take your Social Security to soon as you can because you don’t know if you’re going to be alive next year too many sicknesses are around

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you are single: maybe.
      If you are married: I'd think about it a different way.
      Zacc covers that from 30:30 - 33:21
      And especially from 31:59 - 33:21

  • @andreaartist7207
    @andreaartist7207 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Didn't the spousal benefit change in 2024? If so could you discuss this int the future? Thanks!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi Andrea, there are proposals out there, but not official changes yet. There is an article that is sort of gotten a lot of popularity because is is on the SSA.gov site. It talks about proposals and people are acting like it's official. We'll keep you posted if that changes!

  • @pinkmoonrisin
    @pinkmoonrisin 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Please help! The info at 35:22 has given me info I didn’t have. Thank you! My question is as a survivor that thought about taking the benefit at 60 they would not tell me how much my husband’s would be at my full retirement. They only told me what it would be now. When he passed there wasn’t an online account set up so I couldn’t look at it. Is there a way to find out what his will be so I can decide how to do this? I didn’t take it this year because they would have taken half of it back and I would have to pay taxes on the rest.

  • @richardallard519
    @richardallard519 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Eric, just finished watching your social security video with Zac and it was an extremely worthwhile chunk of time. Looking forward to watching he followup piece on Roth conversions. Keep up the great work

  • @susanmarich5487
    @susanmarich5487 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oh my goodness. I got remarried 1 and a week before 60. Why didnt i know this about survivorship?

  • @rowddyone3570
    @rowddyone3570 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    in survival benefit does amount stop at PIA, or grow more at 70? Even if other spouse claimed at62?

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Survivor benefit is a percentage of whenever the living spouse takes the benefit based on whatever the deceased spouse was receiving. If the deceased spouse delayed and had more than the PIA, the surviving spouse's benefit is based on the higher amount. Likewise if the deceased spouse took early and had a reduced benefit, the spouse also has their percentage of the reduced benefit.

  • @xZOIEM6x
    @xZOIEM6x 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You mean still pay in to ss. And not receive? Is that what your saying?

  • @avis4433
    @avis4433 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Your video gave us a lot to think about; excellent - thank you 💙!