The Truth About When Should You Take Social Security to Get The Most Out of Your Benefits

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ค. 2024
  • If you want to know when you should take Social Security watch this video!
    Be sure to go to Zacc's free Financial Education Platform here:
    www.thefinancialcall.com/guid...
    Need help? Email me!
    Erik@TheRetirementNerds.com
    Visit our website: www.TheRetirementNerds.com
    Join our newsletter:
    theretirementnerds.com/newsle...
    =============================
    This video is NOT sponsored.
    The Retirement Nerds is the no-cost educational platform and serves to offer information around Medicare, Social Security, Financial Planning, and Estate Planning.
    =============================
    Send me a message!
    =============================
    Erik@TheRetirementNerds.com
    ⏰ TIME CODES ⏰
    0:00 Rules of Thumb Problem
    0:14 Zacc Introduction
    0:40 Beware Absolutes
    3:40 What's on the Menu?
    7:00 Important Terms & Acronyms
    11:57 Spousal Benefits Rules
    23:40 Divorced Spousal Benefit Rules
    28:48 Deceased Spouse - Survivor Benefits
    37:49 Survivor Benefits and Remarriage
    41:50 Survivor Benefits & Ex Spouses
    43:19 The Menu Recap
    44:28 3 Separate Strategies Based on Time
    45:53 Breakeven Analysis on Steroids
    56:37 What if Social Security Disappears?
    1:03:17 When Should YOU Take Social Security?
    1:08:07 Still Working with SS Benefits
    1:11:28 Taxing Social Security Income
    1:20:22 Role of an Advisor
    =============================
    #socialsecurity #90daysfromretirement #socialsecuritybenefits #socialsecurityretirement #retirement #retirementplanning #retirementinvesting #retirementadvice #retirementincome #finance #financialfreedom
    Federal Disclaimer:
    We do not offer every plan available in your area. Any information we provide is limited to those plans we do offer in your area. Please contact Medicare.gov or 1-800-MEDICARE to get information on all your options.
    Disclosure:
    This podcast is intended for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for personal advice from Capita. This is not a recommendation, offer, or solicitation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results. There can be no assurance that investment objectives will be achieved.
    Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, including the loss of money invested. Therefore it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy, including the investments or investment strategies recommended or proposed by Capita will be profitable. Further, Capita does not provide legal or tax advice. Please consult with your legal or tax professional for advice prior to implementing any strategies discussed during this podcast.
    Certain information discussed during this podcast is based upon forward-looking statements, information and opinions, including descriptions of anticipated market changes and expectations of future activity. Capita believes that such statements, information and opinions are based upon reasonable estimates and assumptions. However, forward-looking statements, information and opinions are inherently uncertain and actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements, information, and opinions. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

ความคิดเห็น • 509

  • @cynthiabrier2828
    @cynthiabrier2828 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    My dad worked until he was 70 and took SS at 65. He also had a pension, which he paid into all of his working life. He only received 2 years of his pension. Tragic.

  • @almoemason
    @almoemason 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +220

    I retired and took my social security two years ago at age 62. Was it a good decision from a financial standpoint, no not even close. Am I in poor health ... no. I was just sick of working. I quit work and spent my entire Roth buying a boat, and that was not a good financial decision either. But they were the BEST two decisions I have made in my life. It's not always about the money. You are going to die, sooner or later. Have as much fun as you can, as long as you can.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Thank you for sharing your perspective on this!

    • @rubicon3416
      @rubicon3416 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      So are you living on SS only?

    • @almoemason
      @almoemason 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rubicon3416 No, I have a Navy pension and a state of Floriduh pension along with social security. I no longer have my Roth, I spent it.

    • @calebmelton5989
      @calebmelton5989 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      How much was your boat?

    • @almoemason
      @almoemason 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@calebmelton5989 $112k +$23K in Refurb and repair.

  • @donniesmith8779
    @donniesmith8779 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    I am still working and I just got my 3rd SS check at 66.5. I am healthy however I planning to retire in the next 3 months at 67 My FRA was 66.5

  • @chris-cx2rv
    @chris-cx2rv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    My dad started at 62 and was healthy. Dropped dead of heart attack at 65. You never know.

  • @rubicon3416
    @rubicon3416 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    Leave it to government to make this so unbelievably complicated.

    • @karenwimberly9296
      @karenwimberly9296 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      INDEED!!! I'd love to see any one of our politicians live for 1 months on what we live on. Lol. Bet they couldn't do it!

    • @debrathornquist2465
      @debrathornquist2465 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Everything at the govt is complicated.

  • @Lulu-kt6gr
    @Lulu-kt6gr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Taking SS early doesn’t have to mean full retirement early. Perhaps one would like to cut down to part time and use the SS benefit as a means to support this transition. This video raises a lot of good questions. Each situation is unique.

  • @susieq9186
    @susieq9186 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    They scared my Dad into taking social security at 62 = $600.00 monthly. He lived to age 89 and was sorry he took social security early.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Sorry to hear that. It is an important decision that can have lasting consequences. That's why we avoid the "always take it at __" talk because everyone is different. Thank you for watching!

    • @ellencox8415
      @ellencox8415 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yep. My grandmother AND mother both lived past 100. I don't know, but have heard being a centenarian is highly generic. Soooooo, I'm not retiring early because I'm basing retirement on 35 years starting at 70.

    • @DrSchor
      @DrSchor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      who were "they"

    • @kennyplay5982
      @kennyplay5982 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Who is "they" that scared him?

    • @susieq9186
      @susieq9186 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kennyplay5982 The person that did my Dad taxes along with people talking and articles/government saying social security was going to run out of money.

  • @GIUL7301
    @GIUL7301 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    I waited till full. I'm still working as a residential contractor part-time, about 700 hours annually. I love it, I'll stop when I don't enjoy it anymore. I'm very healthy both parents are still breathing at 87 years old. Working until full allowed me to pay off my mortgage and become totally dept free.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sounds like you're in a great spot I. Life! Thank you for sharing!

    • @kellyname5733
      @kellyname5733 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Debt free?? Nobody in the US is "totally debt free". There are those pesky income tax's and In your case property tax's too.

    • @tonyl6385
      @tonyl6385 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow God bless you. You're a power of example.

    • @reneb6702
      @reneb6702 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You've got to love what you're doing, which it seems you do, otherwise it's wearing the golden handcuffs while you're working. Love and light to you and yours. ❤

    • @aronsingletary
      @aronsingletary 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kellyname5733that's not debt, it is a recurring expense

  • @pagosabob10
    @pagosabob10 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    When to take SS is a serious decision and an individual one as well. Some need to take it early for various reasons. Others, like me who took it at 62 and did not need to was ultimately it was not a good decision. Waiting til 70 which would have worked out as I am now 83 and in good health was a better decision. Add to that, I made a poor choice in investing and put all into what became a Ponzi Scheme! Crap! :-) Fortunately my second wife inherited more than I lost. Sometimes good fortune smiles on you. But that was just plain luck for us. Not all are so lucky.:-)

    • @pstoneking3418
      @pstoneking3418 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Everything was much cheaper 14 years ago when I retired at 62. People seem to think that cola makes up for the costs increases. It doesn't even come close. I wouldn't have retired at 62 if I wasn't debt free at that time. But I was and have never regretted retiring early. I also have a decent retirement, so it's different for each individuals circumstances.

  • @timmytempleton2488
    @timmytempleton2488 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Retirement doesn't necessarily mean not working. Tomorrow is never guaranteed . I'm drawing mine at 62.

    • @projectkj7643
      @projectkj7643 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Same!

    • @Nunyabizness_
      @Nunyabizness_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Same here! You get to collect longer that way and you can still make a little over 22,000 a year.

    • @skepticalmechanic
      @skepticalmechanic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Everyone is different…

    • @karlatingley8380
      @karlatingley8380 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's what I did when my husband passed away. Even though I wasn't working at the time, I did work my whole life...but needed the money. Now working part time and I'm ok.

  • @matt75hooper
    @matt75hooper 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Formula : 1. You are healthy. 2. You enjoy your work. 3. You collect at 70 so your wife receives your full benefit even if you drop dead at 70 and a day. She deserves to sleep comfortably at night when you're gone. I am head of household and this was my decision. Also- these videos never take into consideration your income from age 62 to 70. It's typically a good strong income $. The perfect launching pad into retirement.

    • @brucefredrickson9677
      @brucefredrickson9677 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Yes, having a lower earning spouse played largely into my decision to wait until age 70. My military pension will drop to 55% after my death so having the higher SS benefit is important to offset that drop in income. Great video.

    • @Lulu-kt6gr
      @Lulu-kt6gr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brucefredrickson9677 very nice to think of your spouse.

    • @rene.s.s
      @rene.s.s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My plan was also to go to 70, and I still might, because my wife will be 63 at that time. But she’s told me I’m not allowed to go before she’s close. She will have a really hard time even though everything will be set. Luckily, I can reduce my pension to 75% and she gets the same for life, she’ll have my high earning survivor benefit, and my maxed 401k (which we’re Roth Laddering near retirement), Mega Backdoor Roth, Roth IRAs, HSAs, and brokerage accounts and my company stocks.
      The new plan is to retire at 62, when she’s 55. My employer has retirement health coverage, which will also cover her in case of me passing before she turns 65. The aforementioned accounts should still cover us with 8 years of earlier retirement and all that time to enjoy our time together sooner.

    • @JohnJohn-wr1jo
      @JohnJohn-wr1jo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Matt, it's such a simple decision for obvious reasons. Unfortunately people either fail to plan or just as bad ignore the obvious and draw early and regret later in life.

    • @kelmike060404
      @kelmike060404 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm hoping you can answer this my husband is 6 years older. He's made significantly more than me if he files at 65 when do I file for spousal benefits when I turn 65 and he's 71?

  • @eduardooramaeddie4006
    @eduardooramaeddie4006 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I retired at 66and 4 months my age, social security had sent me the letter to confirm thank you

  • @RobertSmith-gx3mi
    @RobertSmith-gx3mi 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Buddy and I used to talk about this and debate it all the time.Sixty two, sixty five, sixty seven, seventy?
    He turned 61 in October of 2018, two weeks later he was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreanic cancer and died December 18, 2018.
    The correct answer will be sixty two in my case.

  • @jdjohnston1960
    @jdjohnston1960 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Glad to see a more sophisticated look at the breakeven analysis using the "opportunity cost" of holding on to one's personal investments longer. I did the same and used multiple rates to test different rates of return. The most reasonable rate of return for me pushed the breakeven date from age 78 to age 82. Knowing that, I chose to file as early as possible and use the government's money via Social Security rather than my own.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Appreciate you watching and sharing your experience. Few go into the detail you did for your calculation.

    • @kellyname5733
      @kellyname5733 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The Governments money 'is your money'. You contributed 'your money' to SS every month.

    • @gkerrhome
      @gkerrhome 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Did you consider the COLA against the larger benefit. I did and as you said, breakeven point was age 82. As my mom died at 84, and dad is still alive at 90, I am choosing to wait till 70.

    • @almoemason
      @almoemason 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Social Security IS your money, not the government's money. Even though it is a horrible retirement plan from a financial standpoint, you would do better in a standard savings account, it is a retirement plan that you and your employer(s) paid into.

  • @ZzXZ636
    @ZzXZ636 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Most of my family died before every getting social security . Something to think about ..,

  • @ron9665
    @ron9665 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    1:00:48 I think your best move is to plan on retiring without SS and then count it as icing on top when/if it does arrive. If I can set my retirement funds to create a situation in which my projected needs are covered (and possibly some of my wants too) then at least I am not playing the "I can probably skip my meds this month because I have hit the Medicare doughnut hole.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hoping for the same freedom when the time comes. Donut hole goes away in 2025 😊

  • @jamestamu83
    @jamestamu83 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    This channel is a great source of information for folks approaching retirement. My wife and I are new subscribers. Thanks for the well-presented, clear, and not overlaying complicated explanation of the basics.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much, James! Appreciate you spending time with us!
      We just released a new video (seconds ago) on Social Security taxability that you may enjoy :)
      th-cam.com/video/ZetbFdEqi2A/w-d-xo.html

  • @Spawny500
    @Spawny500 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    If you can still work, and don't mind it, would delay until full retirement age(FRA). That way, you can make a lot more $$$ working from age 62-66, than not, due to the SSA earnings cap. When you finally begin drawing at FRA, you'll have the advantage of greater savings & greater security, having earned more income from age 62-66. If desired, you'll also be able to continue working without an earnings cap, now that you have reached full retirement age. There is no one size fits all. Seek advice for your own situations.

  • @marykwart9331
    @marykwart9331 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I had to get SS at 62 because I retired under a firefighter retirement system at age 55 and got a retirement supplement that disappeared at age 62.

  • @user-cf1tm6fx4w
    @user-cf1tm6fx4w 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    This is so informative man. I also listened to the episode on Roth vs traditional. Please keep it up. Would love more episodes like this with this guy. It's seriously wildly valuable.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thank you so much! Recording a new one next week 🙂

    • @user-cf1tm6fx4w
      @user-cf1tm6fx4w 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @90DaysFromRetirement in case you were wondering, none of this is TOO DETAILED! The detail and tangents are so appreciated I can't even express it. Please keep going hard with the substance and detail.

    • @beverleyboateng566
      @beverleyboateng566 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I knew nothing about all this until I started listening to this man, he breaks everything down to it’s smallest denominator, thanks mr. social security explainer: please continue this great teaching…as we continue learning and growing!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@beverleyboateng566 thank you so much for spending time with us! And we are so glad this is helpful!!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@user-cf1tm6fx4w for some reason, TH-cam just showed us this comment even though it is 3 weeks old. Appreciate you saying this! Means so much to us and helps validate our hope to keep these moving forward. Thank you!!

  • @charleslemaire8137
    @charleslemaire8137 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Regarding the timing about when to take SS, as I contemplate my decision to wait until 70, my main criteria was to maximize my spouses fixed income in a post-Charles world. But as I listen to your presentation I realize two concepts compete; I feel comfortable taking on investment risk now, but I am sure my wife would be very uncomfortable with it. So to avoid the risk of my passing or the loss of cognitive ability, I choose to hold out to the maximum. It is a TEAM sport!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      100%! You are wise to look at it as a team sport!

    • @charleslemaire8137
      @charleslemaire8137 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Theretirementnerds - we were born in 1952 and 1953. I started studying SS in my 50s and had the File & Suspend all planned out. That blew up in 2015 (I blame Alicia Munnell), but Restricted Application lasted just long enough for us. BTW, there is virtually no one left that qualifies for Restricted Application (spousal).
      In a couple more years, we will not have to talk about FRAs 66 vs 67. BTW the last person that could get FRA=65 is 85 today.
      In the example where the fellow filed and passed away, the spouse should have moved to a benefit that is 82.5% of his PIA; a safety net for spouses of selfish husbands.

    • @FordF250Tremor
      @FordF250Tremor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I waited and couldn’t be happier

    • @barbie3139
      @barbie3139 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You could also buy a large term insurance policy if you decide to retire earlier. Yes, its not cheap, but we only live so long...

    • @nwlady59
      @nwlady59 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I plan to retire at FR at 67. That is 2.5years from now. My benefit amount is way higher than both my x’s spousal portion. One x is on ssdi and the other is on ss. Both are over 65. If either x spouse dies before I take full retirement can I take their benefit as survivor benefits and then take my ss benefit in 2.5 years? Probably won’t happen, but wanted to know the process. Is a x survivor benefit the same amount as what their ss benefit was when they passed?

  • @virginiagilmour4912
    @virginiagilmour4912 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I’m so grateful to have found Eric’s channel, The Retirement Nerds. Such incredibly helpful information. Thank you! I recommend you to all of my friends and family.

  • @raroque12
    @raroque12 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I love the way you guys have the opposite way to treat your hair… one has the perfect comb with jel and the other one looks like just got out of bed… nice 😊!

  • @ginacardarella
    @ginacardarella 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thank u for this

  • @Bob-yh7ir
    @Bob-yh7ir 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Planned without SS in the mix. We will get it and when I turn my SS on alone will more than cover all our household expenses and some fun. So investments will just be gravy train baby !

  • @artallmon3773
    @artallmon3773 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Excellent job guys! Thank you.

  • @July.4.1776
    @July.4.1776 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    The quality years you have left are a major factor. Everyday you delay is one less day you have to live healthy or at all. 🤔 I worked with a guy that kept saying he was going to work one more year. He never made that last year and died.

    • @CaedenV
      @CaedenV 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Most people who are motivated to work "just one more year" often aren't ready to retire in the first place. I work with a lot of elderly high income people, and the majority of them will die or be forced into retirement because they are too sick to work rather than getting to enjoy a real retirement. There are a few who genuinely love their work and are invested in the company... But most of them are high income with even higher expenses. Cars, homes, boats, spouces, vacations, supporting lifestyles of adult kids and grandkids, you name it, they are proof to me that income or social security are rarely the reason why people don't retire. They just have so many plates in the air that everything is riding on them to keep working and they feel too damn responsible for everyone else to ever give themselves a break.
      And that isn't all bad. They mean well by it. But social security is rarely the real reason to work or not work one more year. It is more the unwillingness to stop expanding lifestyle that keeps people in the rat race. If you can manage that, and pay off debts, then the cut in pay of social security would only be a minor consideration of taking it one year vs another.

  • @margaretnorris5840
    @margaretnorris5840 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Thank you for explaining this complicated stuff.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you Margaret!! Appreciate you!

  • @katydid2k
    @katydid2k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    FANTASTIC conversation, thank you!! I appreciate your immense knowledge and great clarity on all these subjects.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much! So glad it was helpful!

  • @MElife4ME
    @MElife4ME 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Outstanding content. So many variables and SS decisions should be made on an individual by individual, family by family basis. The “growth” discussion as it relates to break even is NEVER discussed.
    Some other considerations are DAC benefits, caregiver benefits, and the family maximum can add even more complexity.
    I appreciate knowing there are firms out there who can consider all factors in helping to advise in this decision making. We most likely will be contacting you for a more in-depth review

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for watching and for leaving such a nice comment! We'd be honored to help in any way we can

  • @flowersfrom7311
    @flowersfrom7311 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It was so helpful!!!
    I wouldn't be surprised if the combined benefit of this show to all the listeners who follow the advice to be in the millions of dollars.
    But there's another important consideration in planning for social security - taxes.

  • @mixville2
    @mixville2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your videos are fabulous and incredibly clear and informative. No hyperventilating or trying to push an agenda, which I pick up from most other YT videos of this type. Just from the few I've watched yesterday and today, I've learned a great deal - and I think I was already pretty well-informed. Great work and thanks.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much! Appreciate you taking the time to watch and leave this comment 😊

  • @ginacardarella
    @ginacardarella 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thank you for making this video

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Of course! Thank you for watching!

  • @eugeniahutiu
    @eugeniahutiu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you verry much!Enormous help with details you have given.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So glad it's helpful! Thank you for watching!

  • @attheworktable
    @attheworktable 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    this entire series needs more "Likes"

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Appreciate you saying this! Thank you so much!

    • @attheworktable
      @attheworktable 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I learned so much from this series of videos.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@attheworktable did you see the new one released yesterday? Zacc did a remarkable job in that one as well.
      th-cam.com/video/flCDgSy25e0/w-d-xo.html

  • @Elena-rt9yu
    @Elena-rt9yu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wow wow wow……so much to learn, thank u, for this valuable information.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So glad it's helpful! Thank you for spending time with us!

  • @debrahazelwood623
    @debrahazelwood623 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I am very grateful for all the information you have shared thank you

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for watching Debra!

  • @avis4433
    @avis4433 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Your video gave us a lot to think about; excellent - thank you 💙!

  • @deelo4153
    @deelo4153 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    😊great information guys! Thank you so much!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for spending time with us 🙂

  • @rtaticek61
    @rtaticek61 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Great presentation on the "when to take SS..." topic. One of the few I have seen that suggests you need to look at more than getting the "max" from SS based on longevity. You may be putting yourself at greater sequence of return risk or missing out on portfolio growth opportunity by waiting. As someone who retired early (stopped working) before 62 I have been analyzing at it more in terms of cash flow and portfolio appreciation than "maximizing" SS amount. I have found the New Retirement application helpful to look at SS scenarios in conjunction with expense and portfolio projections.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for watching and so glad it was useful. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts!

  • @user-xk2rx5gz8f
    @user-xk2rx5gz8f 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thank you!

  • @VuPhanLam
    @VuPhanLam 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks for good informations.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are so welcome! Thank you for watching!

  • @funkqueen2029
    @funkqueen2029 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Good Information!!!

  • @conniefoxx9813
    @conniefoxx9813 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm trying to figure out when to take my Social Security as well, so I truly appreciate this video. My spouse and I are both age 68, and he filed for his at 66 and 4 mos. I'm still working full time, so I was letting mine grow, but even letting mine grow to age 70 will still not equal his...it'll sill be short about a hundred bucks or so. He's dying, so I'm considering if I should go ahead and take mine now, then switch to his once he passes on. Ugh! So much math.

    • @PipersCreek
      @PipersCreek 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why not? Since you’re going to draw his sooner than later. Bank your’s or spend it while he can have some benefit from it.

    • @silvercharm9507
      @silvercharm9507 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So sorry for all you're going through.

  • @richardsilver8485
    @richardsilver8485 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wow!! Enjoyed the episode. Lots of great content and I appreciated your respect of the others privacy. That is quite the galley.

  • @martingainty9623
    @martingainty9623 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A few rules
    1)Married at lease 10 years
    2)Cannot remarry to live off of old-spouses PIA

  • @uninsurable9028
    @uninsurable9028 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Now that the kids are grown and I don’t have to rush home to cook dinner or drive someone to soccer, working is actually enjoyable. Plus I can work from home. And I get paid while I’m on vacation. I see no reason to retire- and definitely not until I’m 67 or 70.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for watching and sharing your thoughts!

    • @justinlanglais9825
      @justinlanglais9825 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm in the same situation.... kids gone, working from home at a job I like.... I'm looking at 67 or 67-1/2 for retirement and SS...

    • @lesadelisi9385
      @lesadelisi9385 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If your second spouse has died, can you file for your ex-spouse’s (first spouse’s) benefits if their PIA is larger than second’s spouse’s?

  • @stevenmcnevin4031
    @stevenmcnevin4031 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I appreciate the information given freely and being married i learned some decisions we might make when we retire. Being in are 50's were not ready to retire anytime soon.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for watching! It's better to be too early than too late :)

  • @kennyplay5982
    @kennyplay5982 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Im gonna try to go for 125%

  • @cavapoo23
    @cavapoo23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm pretty sure that Zacc can accomplish accounting for the opportunity cost of delaying filing (as it relates to investor risk tolerance), by setting up the Excel sheet as he described, with inflation adjusted cash flows for different start dates, then using the "net present value" function to sum the cash flows. The "rate" in the NPV function would correspond to the expected return of the assets outside of S.S. When the net present values are equal for different start dates, that is the break even age. There is a little bit more excel work to automate it, but guessing its well within his wheelhouse (or feel free to reach out and I'll share it, I think I'll build it into my model. I appreciate the podcast, it was very informative).

  • @fatcat220
    @fatcat220 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love both my dogs! Great video & thank you for the content. I'm still undecided between supplement plan vs Advantage.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad it is helpful! Dogs are the best!!

    • @barbie3139
      @barbie3139 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have to be almost in perfect health to change from Advantage to Supplement.
      Wide variety of supplement plans from cheap major med to more expensive covering everything. Have heard horror stories about advantage plans, since insurance co makes care decisions vs. Just your doctor.
      But it is cheaper. Good luck!

  • @philbrennaman4572
    @philbrennaman4572 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What is the video that talks about taxing SS? You mentioned it at the 1:10 mark, and said the video is going crazy right now. Just came across your channel, and perfect timing, I retire in one year. Love all the videos I have seen, thanks

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!
      Here is the SS taxation video:
      th-cam.com/video/-NlSlZeoRn4/w-d-xo.html
      It is for 2023. We will make another for 2024 soon.

  • @carolinapascua3672
    @carolinapascua3672 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I took it at 62 and was glad I did it although I continued working and gets taxed too much and there were times SSS stops it because it gets beyond the capped allowed. But I like to work but this is 100% commission on a W2 but I love what I do.

    • @petermandel2552
      @petermandel2552 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think you might be better off halting ss and pay it back to get a higher return later. Not sure its even possible.

  • @rrr574
    @rrr574 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I am 66 I. In great health love working and making incredible money. I am waiting til 70 . No reason to take it now..

    • @BitsyBee
      @BitsyBee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A reason to take it at my full retirement age (66 and 2/3), but before age 70, is that I have those working years until age 70 to save or invest the social security payments I don't yet need to live on. I did the math, and it would take me until age 86 to make up the difference between the FRA payment and waiting to take the age 70 payment. Most people in my family die at 83- 85. Even if I live to 100, there is a lost opportunity cost to spend the money at an age I can enjoy it, or lost interest which would be thousands.

    • @donnazukadley7300
      @donnazukadley7300 9 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Goodie good for YOU. I am a vacc1ne mandated aka medically gRaped nurse Who worked frontline during C0vid while many made MORE THAN ME WHILE SITTING HOME SAFE AND SOUND DOING ... NOTHING.. who is so ill every day of my life trying to still make a living.

  • @Valorie_in_the_kitchen
    @Valorie_in_the_kitchen 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I wish the tax cap would go away. I was in the earning bracket for a few years where my social security tax ended. It wouldn’t have bothered me a bit to pay on the entire year pay.

  • @georgeferich6803
    @georgeferich6803 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Better analysis in this video than most

  • @ron9665
    @ron9665 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Most money sites seem to suggest 15% - 25% (or more) to create an acceptable retirement situation. If people could retain their 12.4% that SS extracts from them and add the aforementioned 15% - 25% they could end up investing as high as 37.4% of their gross each year in something they could have a little more confidence in. Averaging $75k for their work years (20 - 65) at just 7% could net them $41,079 / month for a 30 year retirement if their rate drops to 4% after retiring.

  • @mikeflair6800
    @mikeflair6800 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The only absolute rule is you. What are your personal circumstances? In my case, I married a younger woman with minor children. For the children to receive social security benefits based upon my work record (my PIA Earnings), I would have to be physically receiving mine, not just have earned, for their benefit to be physically turned on. I physically turned mine on at 62, as early as I could, as the minor benefits will end at 18. We are in a family max situation.

  • @janereinhardt4715
    @janereinhardt4715 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I retired 19 years before my FRA, which will be 67. I may wait until i am 68, 69 or 70 though to start.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Congratulations on such an early retirement!

  • @lindamyers951
    @lindamyers951 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No worries you look handsome. Thank you for your advice

  • @Savannah-ed4rv
    @Savannah-ed4rv 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm 63 on SSDI and a widow who was the higher wage earner. I was told when my SSDI converts at age 67, my FRA, I should suspend my own benefit to let it grow until the age of 70. Then during this time I was told I could not take a Survivor benefit because I had been on disability but that would give me three years without any income in order to end up with a higher Social Security payment on my own record. Now I'm wondering if I should somehow get off disability and claim my Survivor benefit even though it's lower than what I'm getting now. I have asked several so-called experts I Social Security like you and I'm not really getting clarification from what a computer program told me to do. My understanding is that the restricted applications are still available for widows, but the company who ran the program says that that is not the case! Can you please help me with this because the days are taking away and I don't know what the best strategy really would be.

  • @masterlee4370
    @masterlee4370 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What an awesome video. I wish you could have touched on the subject of someone getting a state retirement and then when they start collecting social security too how it will affect it. But with that being said there was so much information in this video. Zach is really awesome with his knowledge and down to Earth speaking. Utah has some really awesome human beings! Great Job!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Zacc is awesome and is such a valuable wealth of knowledge.
      In regards to your state retirement, would this video help? It talks about the WEP and GPO penalties associated with those who work for a state entity that does not contribute to the Social Security side of FICA taxes and instead, offers the pension?
      th-cam.com/video/n4aHC6xnFFM/w-d-xo.html
      Let me know if it is something else you'd like us to tackle and I'm sure we can put something together.
      Appreciate you!

    • @masterlee4370
      @masterlee4370 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had watched this video once before but I don't think I was serious enough in listening to it. This time I was. I went on the SSA Site with the WEP Calculator. I put in my wife's salary for the 10 years they took out social security. She made from 80k to a 100k. I just sort of guessed at it. I didn't see anywhere for the amount to put in for her state retirement. It came out to $1.218 a month. Would that be the amount or would I need to subtract that $547 from it, Thanks for your help.@@Theretirementnerds

  • @paulb9156
    @paulb9156 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is excellent information and advice. Are you aware of a Canadian resource giving this type of information?

  • @July.4.1776
    @July.4.1776 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Moral of the story everyone’s situation will be different. Some say draw down your retirement accounts first. Some say take social security @ 62 and save the invested assets. Depends on what you would like to leave after death.

    • @pagosabob10
      @pagosabob10 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, and it depends on investing wisely.

  • @davidfolts5893
    @davidfolts5893 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks for the great content, gentlemen! Yesterday, I read that only about 4% of people maximize their Social Security benefits, so there is much room for improvement.😀

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much for watching David!
      I always think of you when the more financial videos are published because I know you have a brilliant financial mind. Appreciate you!

    • @davidfolts5893
      @davidfolts5893 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Theretirementnerds Thank you, that is very kind of you to say.

  • @edgonzalez186
    @edgonzalez186 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Whoa!... that first example, that woman cracked the code!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's nice to have options, I guess!

    • @heidikamrath1951
      @heidikamrath1951 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really. Not all three marriages lasted at least 10 years (one was only 6 years). I guess if she was widowed in the 6 year marriage, that would work as she would have been married longer than 9 months for the survivor benefits.

  • @irpain8617
    @irpain8617 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I delayed until 68 to provide delayed credits to the surviving spouse. That was the age my wife reached her full retirement age. I feel what would have been drawn from my portfolio will generate far more income than the 2 years of delayed credits given up by not waiting till 70. I look at Social Security as insurance against out living your money...!!

  • @mfuntanilla7476
    @mfuntanilla7476 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What about taxes and RMDs ? If getting SS early throws you into a higher tax bracket when you have to do RMDs because your investments grew and your Medicare premiums go up, should that also be factored in ?

  • @puravida5683
    @puravida5683 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Some things that are not mentioned enough to seniors! The double taxation of social security. And, the social security tax table has not been adjusted for inflation in decades. Thus, more and more seniors are moved into a taxable or higher tax table. Politicians have been giving seniors lip service for decades, rolling out bills they know won't pass, or just focusing on keeping social security solvent. What they are not telling seniors, social security will be solvent, via The Federal Reserve currency printer. And, that seniors will continue having reduced purchasing power, via the low manulipated annual COLA amounts.

  • @deanworks9252
    @deanworks9252 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m dual entitled. I’m taking survivors benefits at 60. And then switch to my SS at age 70. I have looked at over and over. This is the only thing that makes sense.

    • @gmharris2010
      @gmharris2010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Keep in mind there are income cap limitations on earnings under FRA and if under FRA you need to be mindful of the tax bracket on SS

  • @mikewatch1487
    @mikewatch1487 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Makes no since to touch your investments if you have over $500,000 and instead take SS early and let your investments grow even more.

    • @rayzerot
      @rayzerot 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Except you'll never find a better investment than Social Security. It's the stuff investors dream of. 8% *guaranteed* annual returns? Inflation adjusted every year? Minimum 15% (usually more) of the income tax free?? Social Security is the best investment around. Spend the rest of your money first

    • @LG123ABC
      @LG123ABC 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rayzerot Nope, I'm hanging onto mine as long as possible. I hope to do WAY better than 8%.

    • @rubicon3416
      @rubicon3416 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@LG123ABC- Maybe you will, maybe you won't. We could have a prolonged 1970's scenario where you lose for a decade.

  • @Paul-oy4oy
    @Paul-oy4oy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great Interview. How can I get more information on IRA Topedo? Thanks.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It all revolves around how SS is taxed.
      This video should help: th-cam.com/video/-NlSlZeoRn4/w-d-xo.html
      Traditional IRA income would count in the equation. Roth wouldn't.

  • @bearcreekrealtyholdingsllc3953
    @bearcreekrealtyholdingsllc3953 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My sister is 60 years old now and is legally separated. She collects 50% of her husband's monthly government pension. She left her government job to raise her kids, but went back to work part-time once her kids were close to graduating high school. If she starts collecting social security at 62, she will be penalized for collecting her husband's government pension. Not fair. I heard there may be something in the works to change that. Are you aware of this new law?

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She shouldn't be penalized since this pension was not based on HER work.
      We have heard that Biden has discussed getting rid of the WEP/GPO but nothing has come of it yet. It has been "discussed" for years. Usually as a campaign promise from both parties that isn't fulfilled. Maybe that will change.

  • @guycorrigan1174
    @guycorrigan1174 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A thought on this is that social security is not inheritable. If you are drawing down assets to maximize your SS payment, you are reducing your legacy to your spouse or family members.....if that is a consideration for you.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excellent thought!
      For a spouse, SS benefits are (sort of) inheritable through a survivor benefit. There is a story in there around this where the spouse takes SS early at 62, dies shortly after, and now the spouse is left with the smaller SS benefit rather than the full PIA.
      In this video, we touch on drawing SS early but needing other assets to cover and how that can have consequences.
      th-cam.com/video/ZetbFdEqi2A/w-d-xo.html
      Thank you for adding that!

  • @timothythompson4036
    @timothythompson4036 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I have life insurance, so when I die my wife gets the life insurance and my SS survivor benefit. I am really glad I invested in life insurance when I was younger. It makes waiting to age 67 to collect SS much easier.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Life insurance is important! Thank you for sharing!

  • @rickrich7325
    @rickrich7325 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My wife retired as a Texas school teacher after 30years. She can’t get SS as a retired school teacher, it’s been that way for decades. I’m 65 but not planning on taking until 70 as of right now. If I die she won’t let get any of my social! Just so wrong. If she dies I get her retirement ( our choice when she retired) and my SS until I die.

  • @charleslemaire8137
    @charleslemaire8137 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This was a really good coverage of the topic. I learned that I had a misconception about survivor benefits - THANKS!
    WRT the 4 Breakeven Analysis adjustments Zacc suggests, including the investing temperament and the associated Lost Growth is brilliant, but I wonder if the COLA item makes sense. If there were no inflation, there would be no COLA and one would maintain their buying power and no adjustment would be warranted. As there is inflation, the COLA's purpose is to maintain (sort-of) the buying power of the benefit, so it seems like it should be ignored. The fixed incomes that do not have COLAs are the ones that should be considered and adjusted for.
    Every time the COLA is announced, the news says it is a raise for seniors, but as it never really covers the lost to inflation, it seems to be the celebration of a loss of buying power.

    • @murrays1555
      @murrays1555 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The reason COLA needs to be factored into the break even analysis is that delaying SS benefits increases the dollar amount; delaying until age 70 increases the benefit AND COLA by 77% over age 62 so while a person who takes SS at age 62 may get a $100/mo increase, a person with the same FRA benefit will get $177/mo increase and that definitely changes the breakeven analysis.

    • @charleslemaire8137
      @charleslemaire8137 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@murrays1555 - You make the point that delaying until 70 give a disproportionate COLA over filing at FRA or 62. True. But my point is that the COLA is an attempt at maintaining buying power (I argue one always falls a little behind, as CPI-W is a poor measurement). Inflation needs to be factored into the calculation for retirement income that does not keep up with inflation. When building your plan, figure out how to get increases from your other accounts to keep you even. SS will sort-of fix itself. If you chose to get 124% (132% if you are older), 100%, or 70% (75%) of PIA, the COLA is simply trying to keep your chosen benefit even. Be careful to evaluate sales pitches correctly. Regards.

    • @murrays1555
      @murrays1555 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@charleslemaire8137 I agree, COLA is meant to keep up with inflation and may not be sufficient, but I was replying to your comment "I wonder if the COLA item makes sense" in regards to a breakeven analysis. The answer to that question is unequivocally yes; inflation and your expenses are a different analysis and don't factor into when you "breakeven".

  • @KotoriOnWheels
    @KotoriOnWheels 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We need to figure in how much we can make in wages while retired too, right?
    And the penalties for making too much and what happens to your benefits.

  • @barrymitchell4424
    @barrymitchell4424 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can you please get to the point?
    Last time I went to sleep.
    I’m trying to watch again

  • @FIRED13
    @FIRED13 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Increasing FRA past 67 will absolutely suck for a lot of people-like blue collared workers.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed

    • @FIRED13
      @FIRED13 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Theretirementnerds my 50`s blue collared bros are all staying too feeling years of hard labor. They aren't going to survive to 65, even

  • @gillyOO7
    @gillyOO7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sarasota Tim has all the answers if you want to live in a camper down south.
    With Covid and shit goin down with govt seems to make sense for all to take it at 62

  • @deliaespino4881
    @deliaespino4881 หลายเดือนก่อน

    my present checking account got compromised. I OPEN A NEW CHECKING ACCOUNT & is there a form that needs to be filled up? Pls let me know. Thank you.

  • @JaniceHylton
    @JaniceHylton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My husband will take at 70.
    I will take it at 62.
    I will retire at 55.
    We will have lifetime health insurance

  • @FrankBatistaElJibaro
    @FrankBatistaElJibaro 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    @90 Days From Retirement
    Thank you for your video. I am still confused because my situation is very rare.
    My wife is 5 years older than I am.
    I want to take Social Security at 67. She would be 72 at that time.
    She is ok with retiring at any age after 62 so when, should she take hers and when should she take spousal?
    My PIA is 2924, hers is 1108, both at 67.
    Or can you please do a video where the lower earning spousal benefit spouse is older? I've never seen anyone cover that nuance.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi Frank! Great comment. You are always free to send me an email to erik@90daysfromretirement.com and I'll connect you with Zacc's team. It is no cost to have a conversation with them and they can give you some direction and a plan around your circumstances

  • @jman3970
    @jman3970 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have to think about life expectancy. For example my father and his brother were the first men in their paternal line to live past 50 (heart disease), my father already has had two heart attacks, he would be a great candidate to take early retirement at 62 or for disability if it gets worse. He also has a comprehensive retirement plan on top of social security, 2 pensions (19 years and 17 years), 401k, and a paid off house he could downsize, which is basically a fancy way of saying that he has other incomes during retirement. He realistically could possibly not make it past his 70s, so retiring at 67 might mean his retirement won't last 10 years. Where he could retire at 62 and if he does pass in his 70s he has much more time to enjoy his retirement.

  • @staceystovall7583
    @staceystovall7583 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Great video! Question: Is there a way to calculate how much your social security payment will be if you choose to stop working before your FRA? The social security information sheet makes the assumption that your earnings will continue to be the same as your most recent annual earnings reported. If you stop working 5 years prior to your FRA, for example, your monthly social security estimates will be something less than those listed.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you for watching!
      Many financial advisors will have some sort of tool to help calculate that kind of thing. Zacc and his team do not charge for social security consultations. I know other financial advisors do the same. That's probably a good and accurate way to go.

    • @tinarhodes4188
      @tinarhodes4188 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      You can fill out a form and send to SSA advising them of the age you want to stop working before FRA and they will mail you an estimate of what you can expect to earn. I did this, it was very helpful.

    • @Kenji-ds9rf
      @Kenji-ds9rf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      On SSA.gov, you can edit the income for the upcoming year to $0, then a new chart will show how much you'll receive.

    • @JBoy340a
      @JBoy340a 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The SSA website will tell you this

    • @dennybrown1290
      @dennybrown1290 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is an option on the SSA.gov calculator that lets you enter an amount for future earnings and zero is an option.

  • @dperreno
    @dperreno หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just a comment - I'm assuming that you meant to say that people would be earning a "return" on their IRA/401K portfolios, not just interest. "Interest" is a specific type of payment and does not include appreciation in the value of the underlying assets.

  • @rebpos6519
    @rebpos6519 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My mom needs to talk to you!!

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Send her our way!
      Erik@90daysfromretirement.com is my email address. Have her include what state she's in 🙂

  • @redcloud5813
    @redcloud5813 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Doubtful. Historical stock market returns (s&p) are about 7.5%. Every year you delay taking SS it raises about 8%.

  • @user-oj4gh7sp5q
    @user-oj4gh7sp5q หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here’s the other problem: I’m turning 65 next month, and I’m being forced to get on Medicare off of my wife’s insurance. My full retirement date is 66 and 10 months. So, I’m out of pocket paying for Medicare for 22 months. Why is the date for Medicare and SS different? If I don’t take Medicare now I’ll be penalized for the rest of my life. Government just trying to screw folks looks like to me

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is your wife still working and covered by a company plan? You may not have to go on Medicare.
      Watch this video:
      th-cam.com/video/jwQKngHS5zI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=fGeenFsL-CfIuq1p
      My email is erik@theretirementnerds.com if you want to dig into more details

    • @user-oj4gh7sp5q
      @user-oj4gh7sp5q หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Theretirementnerds. Thanks.

  • @marilynh5487
    @marilynh5487 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My 1st has always been now retired at 43 from the Postal Service Immediate Annuity. Army Reserve at 38, finally at 60, check started. Social Security 62. I want my money 💰 now.
    My sister die at 35 in a car accident 😢.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So sorry to hear about your sister 😢

  • @LeslieNicole
    @LeslieNicole 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is very comprehensive and generous advice on SS, but be sure to look at the video breakdown of topics. I watched an hour of info that didn’t really pertain to me because this is highly targeted to couples (and divorced / survivor) strategies and I am not eligible for spousal or survivor benefits. I guess it’s interesting to know, but doesn’t pertain to me. The advice on not worrying about wether SS will go away was helpful. I’m 62 and was wondering if I should take retirement early - partially for this reason.

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for watching and sharing these thoughts!

  • @Jenny40090
    @Jenny40090 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am going to be 67 in June 2024 . I will have
    Cal Per benefits plan . My question is when will be best time to retire? I want to retire soon .

  • @pstoneking3418
    @pstoneking3418 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Many people don't realize that the social security fund is empty. Our government borrowed money from our social security fund. And regardless what they say they never paid everything back. Todays society security benefits are currently being paid from what's known as the general fund. So, in that respect, the social security fund (now general fund) can never go broke. That's what Congress votes to increase the debt limit on nearly every year.
    The general fund is what runs our country, pays government employees' wages, etc. Consequently. They will always vote to increase the debt ceiling.

  • @Antandthegrasshopper
    @Antandthegrasshopper 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ok

  • @prandn
    @prandn 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ( ~13:45-14:00 in ) On the Spouse getting half of higher wage earners benefit: In our case my wife gets her PIA & then the difference between her PIA & Half of my PIA. Sounded like there was 2 options???

    • @Theretirementnerds
      @Theretirementnerds  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You described it correctly. Zacc goes over this at about 19:36 - 20:47 :) Thank you for watching!

  • @Wonderland41
    @Wonderland41 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes, you can take a divorced spouse benefit if you remarried, if your later marriage ended by annulment, divorce, or death.

  • @jgibbs6159
    @jgibbs6159 19 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    You should NEVER wait until 70 unless money is the only priority - imo. Life expectancy for males now who are age 62 is about 83. Meaning, statistically if you waited until 70 you only have 13 years of the full benefit which is capped at around $5k a month or 60k a year. at 67 its roughly $3,900, so.... you are only earning 8% on 40-56k a year for 3 years. The maximum benefits of $60k a year for 13 years is 780k. The rough estimate for max benefit at 62 is $2,700 x 21 years is $680,000 or just $5k less a year over the same period. In other words, you pay yourself to retire earlier - if you can swing it. If you're checking out at 83, the question is - are you taking some of it with you, ie., enjoyed your last years here, or passing it all on to your heirs/spouse. Lastly, when SSA changes come - and they are for sure coming - who do you think they will go after first for savings? The people at the $2,700 a month level or those at the $5,000 a month? Mathematically, waiting until 70 is the optimal economic choice, but who wants to work for 50+ years and only have 13 years to relax? Plus, there is a HUGE difference between how your body works at 62 and 70. Love the educational content though - best Iv'e seen so far.

    • @donnazukadley7300
      @donnazukadley7300 9 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      I have worked as a nurse for 35 YEARS and only have 2,000 SS. I HAD ENDANGERED MY LIFE DURING C0VID AND MISSED SO MANY YEARS of spending time with family band HOLIDAYS AND DROVE THRU RAINSTORMS and SNOWSTORMS and HURRICANES. HOW IS THIS FAIR?

  • @fsm12385
    @fsm12385 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for that marriage date tip 😂 great analysis guys

  • @user-do8hw9fo4y
    @user-do8hw9fo4y 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about a single person . When should i take SS. Im 63 ... my work is physical and I'm tired .. I'm a stylist for 43 yrs don't know if i can make it to 67 . Will it be ok to start at 65 ?