The NEED To Push Back

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @jenbloom6848
    @jenbloom6848 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Great topic this morning. Bouie’s column was spot on. I think creativity is a must. It diffuses, opens, and leaves room for needed change. Raskin and others “trolling” djt with use of “President Musk,” etc, is a good start. I did feel for you, Prof, with the questions about what you meant by “opposition.” You had to clarify the clarifications. Folks see things as literal, then as metaphoric, then contextual, then literal again. My take is that we’ve been made to be suspicious because truth has been hijacked. I hope to make it to the live stream in January! Be well and thanks for all you do to keep democracy alive. ☮️

  • @Carla-sm7pm
    @Carla-sm7pm 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Thank you for doing this. Every sane voice is needed right now. If you can hang in there your viewership will increase.

  • @suescannon
    @suescannon 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The opposition could save legacy media since they’re not willing to ask the tough accountability questions. They can just report on what the opposition found.

  • @evana.670
    @evana.670 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for this conversation!

  • @TheAdiWeiss
    @TheAdiWeiss 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    This is an important topic, but you knew this. I’ve been thinking about this since I heard Timothy Snyder talk about it. I hope to adjust my writing to avoid hyperbole and concentrate on facts. My excitement about doing something like this grew throughout the episode. And I thank you for that. Should we be looking for Wide Awake recruits, except for the paramilitary parts?

  • @robynme2513
    @robynme2513 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Where do you post the Links? The the Tammy Duckworth or Archived interviews and links?

  • @alannahsinclaire6037
    @alannahsinclaire6037 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I get that you were excited about this topic, but it seems from the questions asked that the explanation was not great. Perhaps a panel discussion with more people that can explain better an opposition way of thinking.