Exactly. Poverty is relative to the time, but with everyone having access to information, and a consistent job being enough to escape poverty, it's really a matter of morality.
@@candorsspot2775 Morality is relative. In addition, everyone does not have access. See Alabama, Mississippi, North Florida, East New York. There are no good opportunities.
@@a.m.m.4592 Lazy response. Right now there's plenty of jobs open but those you are talking about don't have the skills or education to do them. They could learn, but choose not to.
Critical thinking is lacking. Lead paint isnt the focus but one by-products of living in a bad environment. Having less resources makes life hard for anyone. We know why poor country towns, trailer parks, and hoods exist. Poverty. Some people wont ever see money in their bloodlines.
This is true about Black Women enrolling in HBCU’s after A Different World. My wife saw A Different World as a kid and wanted to go to Hillman. And later on, when she got of age. She enrolled in an HBCU and it was the best experience of her life per her words to me. Facts!
Many homes in northern Ohio were built before world war 2 just go to Cleveland and you’ll lots of homes with chipping paint.. however I don’t think that’s the issue with crime rates
Teachers don't want to work in bad neighborhoods not because of the pay but because the parents of the children have zero accountability at home and the kids simply do not want to lean.
Bad schools and communities are byproducts of adults not being mature & proactive🤯 Stop blaming everyone/thing else, bottom line YOU are responsible for YOU and YOUR kids🤯
In pregnant women and young children they also cause developmental issues. He’s saying that the substances affect the way the brain develops for people exposed to them in the hood.
We need to stop finding excuses for why people are not being good parents to thier children. Now they are trying to say lead paint, lead pipes, what about accountability. Kids are a byproduct of sex, screw at your own risk, but own your responsibility
It’s not just the horrible environment. It is the horrible parents or parent. The answer is not killing babies. it’s got to be the most evil shit I ever heard
Maybe because by time those neighborhoods were established, they had less lead in the paint by then. Once the parents are exposed to it, then they are violent and therefore the kids will probably be violent too and the cycle continues. It's not as simple as, hey, put somebody in the house with lead paint and they're violent, and then as soon as you take them out, they're not violent anymore.
Bad schools are created by bad parents and bad administrators, not bad teachers. Teachers are paid to teach, not deal with kids who aren’t raised to behave.
Channels like this one that glorify ignorance, immorality, and senseless violence, also contribute greatly to the overall problem. Trash In = Trash Out
If you not giving Americans in poor neighborhoods the resources to strive and take care of their families, WTF you think going to happen, a kid going hungry everyday eventually going to do what he needs to do to eat.
I have to admit when I hear certain things he says thru other sources not out of his mouth I say I’m done with this dude. Then I hear him talk & I’m like I agree with him. So I do like the dude. The internet is truly undefeated
“There has been suggestive evidence of such a link for decades, though it hasn’t gained much traction in research or policy circles. But the case that lead exposure causes crime recently became much stronger. The “lead-crime hypothesis” is that (1) lead exposure at young ages leaves children with problems like learning disabilities, ADHD, and impulse control problems; and (2) those problems cause them to commit crime as adults - particularly violent crime. For many years, the major source of lead in the environment was leaded gasoline: car exhaust left lead behind to settle into dust on the roads and nearby land. When lead was removed from gasoline, lead levels in the environment fell, and kids avoided the lead exposure that caused these developmental problems. About 20 years later, when those kids became young adults, crime rates fell. This, proponents say, is what explains the mysterious and persistent decline in crime beginning in the early 1990s. The main challenge in measuring the effect of lead on crime is that lead exposure is highly correlated with a variety of indicators related to poverty: poor schools, poor nutrition, poor health care, exposure to other environmental toxins, and so on. Those other factors could independently affect crime. The challenge for economists has been to separate the effect of lead exposure from the effects of all those other things that are correlated with lead exposure. A true experiment - where some kids are randomized to grow up with high lead exposure and others not - is out of the question. So economists have gone hunting for natural experiments - events or policies that divide otherwise-similar kids into comparable treatment and control groups. And they’ve found them. Three recent papers consider the effects of lead exposure on juvenile delinquency and crime rates, using three very different empirical approaches and social contexts. All have plausible (but very different) control groups, and all point to the same conclusion: lead exposure leads to big increases in criminal behavior.” One of these papers considers the aggregate effects of lead exposure on city-level crime, using U.S. data from the early twentieth century. The authors, James Feigenbaum and Christopher Muller, noted that one of the primary ways individuals were exposed to lead during this period was by drinking water pumped through lead pipes. They find that exposing populations to lead in their drinking water causes much higher homicide rates 20 years later, relative to similar places where kids avoided such exposure. This evidence on city-level violent crime is more compelling than previous correlational studies, but perhaps it would be even better to compare similar kids who live in the same community. This would allow us to control for more factors that might independently drive criminal behavior. The next paper does just this, using data from more recent years. Anna Aizer and Janet Currie link data on preschool blood lead levels with data on school suspensions and incarceration, for children born in Rhode Island between 1990 and 2004. They note that kids who happened to live closer to busy roads within a neighborhood are more likely to have high blood lead levels, because the soil near those roads was still contaminated due to the use of leaded gasoline decades ago. But Aizer and Currie find that being exposed to higher levels of lead increases kids’ likelihood of suspension from school as well as (for boys) the probability of being incarcerated as juveniles. The magnitude of their estimates suggest that the reduction in lead exposure due to the switch to unleaded gasoline may indeed explain a substantial portion of the decline in crime in the 1990s and 2000s. The third paper comes at the lead-crime hypothesis from a different direction, and asks whether government programs that aim to reduce lead exposure can protect kids from lead’s negative effects. Stephen Billings and Kevin Schnepel measure the effect of CDC-recommended interventions for kids with elevated blood lead levels. Kids who test above a certain lead level twice in a row are provided intensive services - including lead abatement in their home and nutritional counseling to mitigate the effects of lead exposure. The reason two tests are required is that blood lead tests are extremely imprecise. There are therefore a lot of kids who test over the threshold once but not the second time, for reasons other than their actual lead exposure. Billings and Schnepel use the noise in these test results as random variation that divides kids into treatment and control groups: kids who tested over the threshold twice get these services, while kids who tested over the threshold once and then just below the threshold the second time do not. The intuition is that these kids have similar blood lead levels, but due to random noise in the test, some are treated and others are not. By comparing what happens to those two groups of kids, Billings and Schnepel are able to measure the effects of CDC-recommended interventions on kids’ outcomes. They use data on kids born between 1990 and 1997 in Charlotte-Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The data include results of blood lead level tests as well as school records and adult arrests. They find that, relative to the control group, kids who receive the intervention exhibit substantially less antisocial behavior, including suspensions, absences, school crimes, and violent crime arrests. These results are striking for two reasons: (1) The kids’ blood lead levels - low by historical standards - are high enough to affect their behavior and put them at risk for suspensions and arrests. (2) The CDC-recommended interventions have a big impact and can substantially mitigate those risks. The authors conclude: “It is likely that increasing the frequency and intensity of intervention for lead-exposed children will yield a profound return considering the potential long-term effects of lead on health and human capital.” These new studies give us compelling evidence that ongoing lead exposure in communities across the country will have long-term costs to society. But they also provide evidence that we can do something to help kids who have been exposed to high lead levels, and that the benefits of such interventions far outweigh the costs. (Billings and Schnepel estimate that for every $1 invested in the intervention they studied, society yields a return of nearly $1.80.)”
uh Idk bout the lead paint theory but I’m from the hood. Grew up poor and I mean 99.8% of crime is bc folks ain’t got money. When you broke & hungry, you get sad and then that turns into anger. & people do dumb shit when they’re angry & broke, myself included.
@@TheRealOfficialWiseOwlWeve known about the lead and the effects since the 70's. People are angry for many reasons, but the way they react is different.
Hmmm….155 years ago nearly all blacks were poor and didn’t have money…why wasn’t their such high crime rates then? Why not 130 years ago, or 100 years ago. Why not even 80 years ago? Blacks had far less of everything than they even have now(including opportunities) why wasn’t the crime rate as high then? 🤔……I’m totally open to hearing your reasoning.
I used to be optimistic about this but I’ve seen it with my own eyes and there’s nothing u can do to fix it. I’m not about to explain it but it took generations on top of generations to get to this chaos we have today and it’s a mentality. U will never change ppl who r set in their ways it’s just not going to happen. And it trickles down to the next generation.
Many studies have linked lead exposure to increased arrests, including violent crime arrests. For example, a meta-analysis of about 30 studies found that declining lead exposure likely accounted for about 15% of the decline in homicides in the United States from 1989 to 2014
The sheer and overwhelming level of incompetence mixed with the unreasonable amount of leeway afforded to the DA is embarrassing. I literally feel embarrassed for this inept, incompetent, unintelligent, unintelligible, non sensical arguments, invalid mumbo jumbo that a freshman lawyer would know better and have the sense to understand not to get into etc. Granted, the razor thin evidence would make, making an argument more difficult but again. Being stupid and incompetent as well as unable IQ wise to do the job as a DA of course is why were seeing what we are seeing and have been seeing and will continue to see.
Things like fruit bearing trees being cut down. Now all the trees are pollinators along with more recorded allergies than ever. Both these instances add to cost of living. With Food and Pharmacy both being cornerstones in the economy it’s hard to find that coincidental. Speaking to the nature of the American situation. Governance has become unbearably greedy
Just imagine how goofy you gotta be to think this is a logical argument for supporting a point. Two people who are clearly not in any position to support a logical argument for most things that are actually complex and they try to simplify things because they’re not qualified to understand what they’re talking about. 1:50
I think there's just 2 mentalities and one is more common than the other. One kid will see the mess around them and want to avoid that - another kid will see the mess and think that's all there is and it's all they can be. But it's extremely difficult to be kid 1, ALL the time. Especially if people around you or are raising you aren't like that.
Not the "abortion lowered the crime rate" bs again. There's a whole lot of factors besides just abortion. Crime rates went down in every city and country that isn't a warzone, regardless of their position on abortion.
People don't just want babies. They want people to be responsible, get married, and create families. And this whole more abortions lowering the crime rate doesn't make much sense considering the legalization of abortion is part of what led to the majority of blk babies being born outside of marriage.
@@ibervillezee9142that post literally looks like he sees that comment on every TH-cam video and wanted to say it so bad but unfortunately it doesn't make sense this time. Sorry bud . Yo protect this man at all costs he found the free energy cheat code!
Don’t know of a whole lot of poor Asian neighborhoods but there’s definitely crime & Asian gangs are some of the most violent gangs there are, they just don’t show it.
Fatherless communities due to mass incarceration is whated to the destruction on black communities....look at the statistics in regardsto single mothers and men that are incarcerated.....mind blowing
Now I do agree that single parent households contribute more to being at risk for violence, health and certain financial issues. Nevertheless, how do you equate that's the reason crime went down 15 years was because of abortion. You can't conclude what children would have been who never was here to study. That's not an intelligent take.
That's not true one of my family members have two sons that had lead paint they got the lead out his system before he got older and he is a straight A student it's off to the parents to take the kids to the doctor to get lab blood test
I disagree. I feel like the best schools are in bad neighborhoods! and bad kids go into the schools and make the school bad schools are not bad! so it kills me when you see people make fun of certain artist or rappers that went to our school and they don’t have no idea that good schools are in bad neighborhoods.
That’s sounds great Vlad but most kids/teens are not mature enough to be inspired by a rich friend.. more than likely jealousy would rear its ugly head
Interesting piece. I like where DL is coming from here. I admire “progressive” people. People who I don’t admire are squares. People that actually believe that America is a great country. There used to be 2 great things about America: movies and music. Those two things don’t exist anymore.
I do think that people who don’t want kids shouldn’t have them…… If yall think it’s bad now wait to all the BBL and face tattoos parents kids that they didn’t want grow up !!!! It will be Gotham city 😅
Lead bullets are the reason for high crime in poor black neighborhoods.
😂😂😂😂😂
Facts
That made more sense.
That was dumb ass hell!
That wasn't as deep as you thought that it was.
VLAD....You gotta let people talk,nobody cares about your stories!!!
Facts how the host got a story for ever thing
Goofy basketball ppl, with the same black Twitter talking points.
at least they aint touchn kids or shtn up skools like yall 😂😂
We care
@@LowProductionValues-fj2nu goofy racist person
Ninjas were poor before and never was this morally horrible smh
Exactly. Poverty is relative to the time, but with everyone having access to information, and a consistent job being enough to escape poverty, it's really a matter of morality.
@@candorsspot2775
Morality is relative.
In addition, everyone does not have access. See Alabama, Mississippi, North Florida, East New York.
There are no good opportunities.
@@a.m.m.4592 Lazy response. Right now there's plenty of jobs open but those you are talking about don't have the skills or education to do them. They could learn, but choose not to.
Because those jobs aren’t taught to them as young until they get a person or a adult to teach them or it’s going to be a low vibration mindset
It’s the music , culture, and victim mentality
Black culture, embarrassed by nothing but yet completely offended by everything 😑
Just hursh brudda
1000%
Sounds more like White Culture, which is why they don't want AmeriKKKan history taught in schools.
Ignorance at its best
Ive seen this said four different ways in one day lmao. Im pressing up shirts.
Critical thinking is lacking. Lead paint isnt the focus but one by-products of living in a bad environment. Having less resources makes life hard for anyone. We know why poor country towns, trailer parks, and hoods exist. Poverty. Some people wont ever see money in their bloodlines.
😂😂😂 2024 stop saying the same shit
@@youngjmaryland3729 in 2024 aren’t we going through the same shit. We know the problem. Money. We’ve been in a deficit for 400 years.
This is true about Black Women enrolling in HBCU’s after A Different World. My wife saw A Different World as a kid and wanted to go to Hillman. And later on, when she got of age. She enrolled in an HBCU and it was the best experience of her life per her words to me. Facts!
They stopped putting lead in paint 1978…
So what’s the excuse after that and now?
Big facts..... lead was taken out so that he govt can spy on citizens more efficiently.....
Also once you paint over it it’s no longer a danger so what are we talking about
Many homes in northern Ohio were built before world war 2 just go to Cleveland and you’ll lots of homes with chipping paint.. however I don’t think that’s the issue with crime rates
Teachers don't want to work in bad neighborhoods not because of the pay but because the parents of the children have zero accountability at home and the kids simply do not want to lean.
Learn🤔
They dont want to get shot in the suburbs either
You were one of them huh? 😂
They want to lean …off of syrup!!! They don’t want to learn. Who does ,other then math and learning to read the rest of the bs taught to us is a lie .
Vlad what led up to Rick Ross beating yo ass
I know right Asians eat Paint, Dogs, Rats, Cats and Mice they don't commit crime😂😂
@@SoloDolo01you act like cos don’t be doing street shit 😂
Lol vlad s
always talks about when he sold drugs, went to jail, how bout when u got ur ass kicked
First thing I’ve ever stood behind vlad on. Bad schools bread bad environments
instead of teaching, they are warehousing kids.
Bad schools and communities are byproducts of adults not being mature & proactive🤯
Stop blaming everyone/thing else, bottom line YOU are responsible for YOU and YOUR kids🤯
Lead paint is extremely bad for humans , I do think it can have brain effects aswell
Yea its the lead paint in the walls that makes Fathers leave their kids.
Crime is linked to poverty........
Lead paint & Mold Cause Health Problems
The Ultimate Cause Of Health Problems Is Living
In pregnant women and young children they also cause developmental issues. He’s saying that the substances affect the way the brain develops for people exposed to them in the hood.
“Get a friend in high school who has a Benz and Rolex’s”. Dude lived a very lucky life
A lot of people have friends in high school with Benz and Rolex’s. They usually die the next couple of years though.
Both of these Men are on the right track. Our biggest problem is those at the top know that it's big money in keeping people poor.
Facts! Thank you for sharing your Interview with Vlad with me Brother DL Hughley. 🙏🏾🙌🏾👍🏾👊🏾💜💯
How do you explain high crime anywhere black peoples live?
It’s not anywhere they live😂😂black people live in white neighborhoods too
@@daniellebron4295yeah but it's a few black people in those white neighborhoods
@@daniellebron4295 and black people have really wealthy communities too.
Simple. Poverty. Go around the world and its always the most impoverished communities with high crime. Doesn't matter the race.
@@mickiemallorieABSOLUTELY!!!
In the past everybody used lead paint, not just the black community
Two words; fatherless communities.
Never thought about that but wow statistically speaking kids that are born in unwanted or terrible households are more likely to be criminals
We need to stop finding excuses for why people are not being good parents to thier children. Now they are trying to say lead paint, lead pipes, what about accountability. Kids are a byproduct of sex, screw at your own risk, but own your responsibility
Crack is the Reason for High Crime in Poor Neighborhoods.
It was high in the 70s, too.
It Was Happening Before Crack
That was in the 80s
🧢
Interesting way to say black people
Lead pipes/plumbing led to the decline of Rome. Poisoning.
And you-know-who STUDIED all the fallen civilizations and nations and used the same tactics on other groups to keep them down…
Immigration did, not irrigation.
@@RingDAlarm-xn1zq One of many things...
This was a good interview Vlad and DL made some good points
Here because of Marlon Wayans
🤦🏿♂️
Lol
😂
Go away
Fact's!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
VLAD MAKES IT SOUND SO EASY, TALKING ABOUT GO GET A RICH FRIEND
It’s not just the horrible environment. It is the horrible parents or parent. The answer is not killing babies. it’s got to be the most evil shit I ever heard
Then why arent poor asian neighborhoods violent?
Ever been to the West Coast
You haven’t to east San Diego have you??
Ever been to a poor Asian neighborhood?
@@afrolore7462 yeah, Asian neighborhoods are overwhelmingly safe.
Maybe because by time those neighborhoods were established, they had less lead in the paint by then. Once the parents are exposed to it, then they are violent and therefore the kids will probably be violent too and the cycle continues. It's not as simple as, hey, put somebody in the house with lead paint and they're violent, and then as soon as you take them out, they're not violent anymore.
Bad schools are created by bad parents and bad administrators, not bad teachers.
Teachers are paid to teach, not deal with kids who aren’t raised to behave.
What about all our recent young criminals? Lead paint hasn't been used in decades. Next excuse?
The Cosby show is the reason why I went to law school and moved to New York.
Channels like this one that glorify ignorance, immorality, and senseless violence, also contribute greatly to the overall problem. Trash In = Trash Out
Better nutrition would help people's mindstates.
If you not giving Americans in poor neighborhoods the resources to strive and take care of their families, WTF you think going to happen, a kid going hungry everyday eventually going to do what he needs to do to eat.
I have to admit when I hear certain things he says thru other sources not out of his mouth I say I’m done with this dude. Then I hear him talk & I’m like I agree with him. So I do like the dude. The internet is truly undefeated
I’m 46 and n.w.a ruined my life
yea it has nothing to do with lack of family structure, upbringing and personal choices....
“There has been suggestive evidence of such a link for decades, though it hasn’t gained much traction in research or policy circles. But the case that lead exposure causes crime recently became much stronger.
The “lead-crime hypothesis” is that (1) lead exposure at young ages leaves children with problems like learning disabilities, ADHD, and impulse control problems; and (2) those problems cause them to commit crime as adults - particularly violent crime. For many years, the major source of lead in the environment was leaded gasoline: car exhaust left lead behind to settle into dust on the roads and nearby land. When lead was removed from gasoline, lead levels in the environment fell, and kids avoided the lead exposure that caused these developmental problems. About 20 years later, when those kids became young adults, crime rates fell. This, proponents say, is what explains the mysterious and persistent decline in crime beginning in the early 1990s.
The main challenge in measuring the effect of lead on crime is that lead exposure is highly correlated with a variety of indicators related to poverty: poor schools, poor nutrition, poor health care, exposure to other environmental toxins, and so on. Those other factors could independently affect crime. The challenge for economists has been to separate the effect of lead exposure from the effects of all those other things that are correlated with lead exposure. A true experiment - where some kids are randomized to grow up with high lead exposure and others not - is out of the question. So economists have gone hunting for natural experiments - events or policies that divide otherwise-similar kids into comparable treatment and control groups.
And they’ve found them. Three recent papers consider the effects of lead exposure on juvenile delinquency and crime rates, using three very different empirical approaches and social contexts. All have plausible (but very different) control groups, and all point to the same conclusion: lead exposure leads to big increases in criminal behavior.”
One of these papers considers the aggregate effects of lead exposure on city-level crime, using U.S. data from the early twentieth century. The authors, James Feigenbaum and Christopher Muller, noted that one of the primary ways individuals were exposed to lead during this period was by drinking water pumped through lead pipes.
They find that exposing populations to lead in their drinking water causes much higher homicide rates 20 years later, relative to similar places where kids avoided such exposure.
This evidence on city-level violent crime is more compelling than previous correlational studies, but perhaps it would be even better to compare similar kids who live in the same community. This would allow us to control for more factors that might independently drive criminal behavior.
The next paper does just this, using data from more recent years. Anna Aizer and Janet Currie link data on preschool blood lead levels with data on school suspensions and incarceration, for children born in Rhode Island between 1990 and 2004. They note that kids who happened to live closer to busy roads within a neighborhood are more likely to have high blood lead levels, because the soil near those roads was still contaminated due to the use of leaded gasoline decades ago.
But Aizer and Currie find that being exposed to higher levels of lead increases kids’ likelihood of suspension from school as well as (for boys) the probability of being incarcerated as juveniles. The magnitude of their estimates suggest that the reduction in lead exposure due to the switch to unleaded gasoline may indeed explain a substantial portion of the decline in crime in the 1990s and 2000s.
The third paper comes at the lead-crime hypothesis from a different direction, and asks whether government programs that aim to reduce lead exposure can protect kids from lead’s negative effects. Stephen Billings and Kevin Schnepel measure the effect of CDC-recommended interventions for kids with elevated blood lead levels. Kids who test above a certain lead level twice in a row are provided intensive services - including lead abatement in their home and nutritional counseling to mitigate the effects of lead exposure. The reason two tests are required is that blood lead tests are extremely imprecise. There are therefore a lot of kids who test over the threshold once but not the second time, for reasons other than their actual lead exposure. Billings and Schnepel use the noise in these test results as random variation that divides kids into treatment and control groups: kids who tested over the threshold twice get these services, while kids who tested over the threshold once and then just below the threshold the second time do not. The intuition is that these kids have similar blood lead levels, but due to random noise in the test, some are treated and others are not. By comparing what happens to those two groups of kids, Billings and Schnepel are able to measure the effects of CDC-recommended interventions on kids’ outcomes.
They use data on kids born between 1990 and 1997 in Charlotte-Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The data include results of blood lead level tests as well as school records and adult arrests. They find that, relative to the control group, kids who receive the intervention exhibit substantially less antisocial behavior, including suspensions, absences, school crimes, and violent crime arrests. These results are striking for two reasons: (1) The kids’ blood lead levels - low by historical standards - are high enough to affect their behavior and put them at risk for suspensions and arrests. (2) The CDC-recommended interventions have a big impact and can substantially mitigate those risks. The authors conclude: “It is likely that increasing the frequency and intensity of intervention for lead-exposed children will yield a profound return considering the potential long-term effects of lead on health and human capital.”
These new studies give us compelling evidence that ongoing lead exposure in communities across the country will have long-term costs to society. But they also provide evidence that we can do something to help kids who have been exposed to high lead levels, and that the benefits of such interventions far outweigh the costs. (Billings and Schnepel estimate that for every $1 invested in the intervention they studied, society yields a return of nearly $1.80.)”
DL came up with every excuse. Mention the lack of fathers, drugs, gangs, and lack of education. We have to take accountability
Your stupid!
Im just now realizing his hat doesn't say " Lowe's" 😂🤦🏾♂️
Dl is right about lead paint
uh Idk bout the lead paint theory but I’m from the hood. Grew up poor and I mean 99.8% of crime is bc folks ain’t got money. When you broke & hungry, you get sad and then that turns into anger. & people do dumb shit when they’re angry & broke, myself included.
Facts 💯
@@TheRealOfficialWiseOwlWeve known about the lead and the effects since the 70's. People are angry for many reasons, but the way they react is different.
Hmmm….155 years ago nearly all blacks were poor and didn’t have money…why wasn’t their such high crime rates then? Why not 130 years ago, or 100 years ago. Why not even 80 years ago? Blacks had far less of everything than they even have now(including opportunities) why wasn’t the crime rate as high then? 🤔……I’m totally open to hearing your reasoning.
Besides getting a legit job right
@@TheRealOfficialWiseOwlBullshit stop being lazy
"They belong in the ocean." 🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️
Parents scraping by but kids driving Benz’s to school and wearing Rolex’s, living in mansions 🤔somebody help me out 😂
I used to be optimistic about this but I’ve seen it with my own eyes and there’s nothing u can do to fix it. I’m not about to explain it but it took generations on top of generations to get to this chaos we have today and it’s a mentality. U will never change ppl who r set in their ways it’s just not going to happen. And it trickles down to the next generation.
Many studies have linked lead exposure to increased arrests, including violent crime arrests. For example, a meta-analysis of about 30 studies found that declining lead exposure likely accounted for about 15% of the decline in homicides in the United States from 1989 to 2014
The sheer and overwhelming level of incompetence mixed with the unreasonable amount of leeway afforded to the DA is embarrassing. I literally feel embarrassed for this inept, incompetent, unintelligent, unintelligible, non sensical arguments, invalid mumbo jumbo that a freshman lawyer would know better and have the sense to understand not to get into etc. Granted, the razor thin evidence would make, making an argument more difficult but again. Being stupid and incompetent as well as unable IQ wise to do the job as a DA of course is why were seeing what we are seeing and have been seeing and will continue to see.
Fatherlessness is the reason for high crimes in poor neighborhoods. Being poor with little to no infrastructure is the reason for high crimes
Vlad: "Crabs belong in the ocean" 😂😂😂
Watts water been messed up since I was a kid.
Things like fruit bearing trees being cut down. Now all the trees are pollinators along with more recorded allergies than ever. Both these instances add to cost of living. With Food and Pharmacy both being cornerstones in the economy it’s hard to find that coincidental. Speaking to the nature of the American situation. Governance has become unbearably greedy
It's not Outliers, it's Freakonomics by Hubner & Lewitt
I know people in their 30's who still get a check from eating paint chips as a kids...😅😂😅😂😅
The only black kids who may have seen vacation houses went to the fresh air fund in the summer. Only a certain amount of kids could go
Just imagine how goofy you gotta be to think this is a logical argument for supporting a point. Two people who are clearly not in any position to support a logical argument for most things that are actually complex and they try to simplify things because they’re not qualified to understand what they’re talking about. 1:50
Vlad why didn’t you let him go into details about the lead? Tf.
All that lead paint in Africa South America and the Middle East 😂😂😂
I think there's just 2 mentalities and one is more common than the other. One kid will see the mess around them and want to avoid that - another kid will see the mess and think that's all there is and it's all they can be. But it's extremely difficult to be kid 1, ALL the time. Especially if people around you or are raising you aren't like that.
Not the "abortion lowered the crime rate" bs again. There's a whole lot of factors besides just abortion.
Crime rates went down in every city and country that isn't a warzone, regardless of their position on abortion.
Freakonomics made that point about abortion, not Malcom Gladwell
They say it's in the water
THEY DO IT BECAUSE THEY'RE TRYNA BE SAVAGES...
This was a good ass interview
BE QUITE VLAD..
BUT YOU ON A SLIPPERY SLOPE..
.
Talking about abortion in the black community
Vlad sound like a straight up white supremacist
People don't just want babies. They want people to be responsible, get married, and create families. And this whole more abortions lowering the crime rate doesn't make much sense considering the legalization of abortion is part of what led to the majority of blk babies being born outside of marriage.
Watch the full interview now as a VladTV TH-cam Member - th-cam.com/users/vladtvjoin
I’m 37. My dad’s childhood courts apartments are still there. Look the same.
Why Vlad so Damn Animated in this interview???
Lead paint ? The government gone come get him protect this man at all times.
The Government told us about it in the 70's.
@@ibervillezee9142that post literally looks like he sees that comment on every TH-cam video and wanted to say it so bad but unfortunately it doesn't make sense this time. Sorry bud . Yo protect this man at all costs he found the free energy cheat code!
Naw, that lead paint stops big brother from spying on you. Poverty and the devil has a way of bringing you down...
Broken Window Theory..
Don’t know of a whole lot of poor Asian neighborhoods but there’s definitely crime & Asian gangs are some of the most violent gangs there are, they just don’t show it.
Travel to other Countries and you'll see numerous poor Asian neighborhoods
This is true it was just recently discovered in the water in Watts
Take them out of the equation 😳 dayum
Avalon looks way better than where I’m from 😂 that’s bs
Fatherless communities due to mass incarceration is whated to the destruction on black communities....look at the statistics in regardsto single mothers and men that are incarcerated.....mind blowing
Vlad missed the entire point
He lacks compassion for the culture doesn’t see things out our lens at all
Poverty is the easy answer.
The book was Freakonomics, not Outliers.
😂 what did i jus listen too? 😂
Another episode of "The Blame Game".
America first to complain, last to arrive, world war 2.
Now I do agree that single parent households contribute more to being at risk for violence, health and certain financial issues. Nevertheless, how do you equate that's the reason crime went down 15 years was because of abortion. You can't conclude what children would have been who never was here to study. That's not an intelligent take.
That's not true one of my family members have two sons that had lead paint they got the lead out his system before he got older and he is a straight A student it's off to the parents to take the kids to the doctor to get lab blood test
DL THE UNDERCOVER 🌈
I disagree. I feel like the best schools are in bad neighborhoods! and bad kids go into the schools and make the school bad schools are not bad! so it kills me when you see people make fun of certain artist or rappers that went to our school and they don’t have no idea that good schools are in bad neighborhoods.
Nah black folk culture the reason....
That’s sounds great Vlad but most kids/teens are not mature enough to be inspired by a rich friend.. more than likely jealousy would rear its ugly head
Why tf is Vlad screaming
bad parenting
Kamala ain’t that bright
It's because there is no dad at home
...why is Vlad always screaming?
Interesting piece. I like where DL is coming from here. I admire “progressive” people. People who I don’t admire are squares. People that actually believe that America is a great country. There used to be 2 great things about America: movies and music. Those two things don’t exist anymore.
I do think that people who don’t want kids shouldn’t have them…… If yall think it’s bad now wait to all the BBL and face tattoos parents kids that they didn’t want grow up !!!! It will be Gotham city 😅
How many kids does Vlad have?
It wuz da white paintz fault!
No fucking way
Does DL have adopted children ?
DL from the east side¿ away shyt!!!