Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains Oxygen

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 954

  • @WIHWVI
    @WIHWVI 3 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    This is proof that education can be even more fun with the right teachers! Bravo 👏

    • @cyvonn
      @cyvonn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True.

    • @KeyBoard-io8nl
      @KeyBoard-io8nl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely. So I can finally breathe relief and relax no probs aheadrt?

    • @sicfxmusic
      @sicfxmusic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not going to happen. No teacher s going to explain like a scientist and no teacher is going above and beyond wasting their time for the salary they're paid.

  • @jamesmiddleton8128
    @jamesmiddleton8128 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    In metal welding, oxygen is an accelerant. Mixing oxygen with a flammable gas or liquid will net a higher temperature flame in the right ratio.

    • @nikitagloukhovtchenko6857
      @nikitagloukhovtchenko6857 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, I agree. Oxygen is 8th on the periodic table and any chemical is an accelerant if exposed to heat to push the particles forward with the faster motion of those particles.

    • @vikingslayer34
      @vikingslayer34 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Actually oxygen is a contaminant in welding. I think you meant metal cutting.

  • @chall4113
    @chall4113 3 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    “oxygen is like a non-burning accelerant?”-Chuck N.
    “Mmmkay,”-Dr. Tyson
    Lol Delightful as always. Made my Tuesday better.

  • @IanUniacke
    @IanUniacke 3 ปีที่แล้ว +258

    1 billion years from now, Cyanobacterianoids are celebrating their independence day. "Let us give thanks to the humans who graciously sacrificed their environment so that we could thrive. Abacteria."

    • @vladmirrazkolov92
      @vladmirrazkolov92 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      "Abacteria" that's gold right there

    • @sosheeanand3537
      @sosheeanand3537 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very impressive

    • @sopanroy1506
      @sopanroy1506 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Abacteria 🌹

    • @RECTALBURRITO
      @RECTALBURRITO 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice.

    • @reasonerenlightened2456
      @reasonerenlightened2456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cyanobacterianoids obtaining self-awareness is impossible without proper environment in which to allow them fast communication (for example, human brains need the environment of the body. And not every brain in a body is self-aware.).

  • @prohandyman4264
    @prohandyman4264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +174

    "The Diner Doctor" has to be a recurring character! Hands down some of Lord Nice's best!

    • @prohandyman4264
      @prohandyman4264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Way too much thought on this but... Doc's Diner: "The Heavenly Hash Editions"

    • @lemongavine
      @lemongavine 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He was cracking Neil up there

    • @ThizzRyuko
      @ThizzRyuko 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sounded like the women from the TV show Venture brother, also it's a good way to lose brain cells

    • @swistedfilms
      @swistedfilms 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lord Nice...good callback!

    • @ragnabrok
      @ragnabrok 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      unintentional mrs. bighead impression

  • @adrianscarlett
    @adrianscarlett 3 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    Chuck could play half the characters on the Simpsons with that voice

    • @ThizzRyuko
      @ThizzRyuko 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Chuck could play a lot of different characters and I hope he continues to get work for the rest of his life that just keeps elevating his career.

    • @NOMAD-qp3dd
      @NOMAD-qp3dd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      that smoker's voice was so hilarious!😄

    • @Brett.McMillin
      @Brett.McMillin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dr Hibbart for sure at least lol

    • @joshuawebster5847
      @joshuawebster5847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How did Indeed let you record an ad copy in a bathroom in a stadium? Your audio is usually so much better. Airpods? No offense meant but I'm a little disappointed. Love you both.

    • @Eremon1
      @Eremon1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sounded exactly like Harvey Fierstein with his diner waitress voice.

  • @galactic-gumbo9911
    @galactic-gumbo9911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +365

    Man chuck makes this show so much better he’s just great😂

    • @hououinkyouma5539
      @hououinkyouma5539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      If you need him to find this interesting, you weren't really interested in the first place

    • @EliasBac
      @EliasBac 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@hououinkyouma5539 Buzz Killer.
      He didn't say it would suck without him.
      And even tho he was not interested in the first place (assumption) - Now he is. Mission accomplished.

    • @galactic-gumbo9911
      @galactic-gumbo9911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@hououinkyouma5539 come on buddy it ain’t that serious chill out we all here to learn and laugh😂

    • @dahc0023
      @dahc0023 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@hououinkyouma5539 attention seeker spotted

    • @Dontbustthecrust
      @Dontbustthecrust 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah Chuck is pretty Nice.

  • @thejoshbtv
    @thejoshbtv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Chuck was killing it this episode.

  • @annewayman4862
    @annewayman4862 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Not only do I learn stuff, like O2 only promotes combustion, but I bust a gut laughing. What great teachers you two are.

    • @carultch
      @carultch ปีที่แล้ว

      In Titan's atmosphere, O2 is flammable, and methane only promotes combustion.

    • @whatabouttheearth
      @whatabouttheearth 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All beings need nitrogen and it's all around us, but only bacteria can fixate nitrogen, so all beings consume bacteria to get fixated nitrogen. Not really an intelligent efficient design

  • @russelltaylor535
    @russelltaylor535 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    In the Apollo 1 accident, the capsule was pressurised to 1 atmosphere with pure oxygen. That made the fire progress almost explosively. There was no way to reduce the pressure in the capsule below ambient, this would have required a vacuum pump, although they could have used atmospheric air for the test instead. Note that pure oxygen at .2 atmospheres has the same fire risk as 78% N2 - 20% O2 at 1 atmosphere.

    • @FranciscoNogueira
      @FranciscoNogueira ปีที่แล้ว

      Cool. Nice to know... That explains why they didn't need to reinforce the capsule structure. Although I then wonder where that whole story about having to redesign the capsule due to the need to pressurize it came from...

    • @Nuchello
      @Nuchello ปีที่แล้ว

      Neil explains it !!!

    • @ecospider5
      @ecospider5 ปีที่แล้ว

      So does that mean the plan was to reduce the cabin pressure to 0.2 atmospheres once they got to the vacuum of space?

    • @1953bassman
      @1953bassman ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FranciscoNogueira Since the capsule was on the launch pad for tests, and not in space, it was pressurized to one atmosphere to equal the outside pressure or it would have had to be reinforced to keep the outside air from leaking in.

    • @Jimjameslewis
      @Jimjameslewis 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another important flaw was that the door to the capsule opened inwards. With the pressure differential it was impossible to open it. It might not have made a difference in this case but it did remove the chance of survival.

  • @FinalConsensus
    @FinalConsensus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Neil and Chuck have the perfect dichotomy for this show. It wouldn't work with another comedian or any other astrophysicist. They're perfect

  • @adamsmith1300
    @adamsmith1300 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Didn't we just witness how Chuck solved the carbon emission problem?

  • @amadiohfixed1300
    @amadiohfixed1300 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    This inspired me to become an oxygen dealer

    • @TraGamer1606
      @TraGamer1606 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      “Yo I got that good ox bro”

    • @radicallybean
      @radicallybean 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TraGamer1606 nah, but I got OxyContin

    • @wrinkyscarnagecrew
      @wrinkyscarnagecrew 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@radicallybean lol do you deliver? Or mail lol

    • @MrSean03839
      @MrSean03839 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's regulated, so you need a license and certifications. ;)

    • @richtomlinson7090
      @richtomlinson7090 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Psst hey kid, first ones free, tell your friends about it.
      It'll make you feel good!

  • @infiniteuniverse9528
    @infiniteuniverse9528 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Oxygen, one of the many chemicals I'm addicted to. Soon American corporations will find a way to start charging money for it.

    • @Raz.C
      @Raz.C 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dude, I wouldn't be surprised at all.
      As an aside, have you seen Spaceballs? Given the subject matter, it seems particularly relevant : D

    • @Prince_Of_Fish
      @Prince_Of_Fish 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      distopian as it would be, living in the Lorax Movie would be funny.

  • @Real28
    @Real28 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Chuck, the symbol isn't flammable. It's the Oxidizer symbol. It's an O that's on fire. The flammable symbol is just flames.

    • @carultch
      @carultch 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you have any idea why inflammable means the same thing as flammable, when it sounds like they are opposites?

    • @MemphiStig
      @MemphiStig 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@carultch technically, they don't mean exactly the same thing, but the opposite of both is non-flammable, so go figure.

    • @77gravity
      @77gravity 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@carultch This is why the UN (some nerd department) ruled that the term "inflammable" should not be used, and the word "flammable" is correct. Thus, you rarely see "inflammable" on labelling and safety signs today. Flammable vs Not Flammable.

  • @terrellgray9777
    @terrellgray9777 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    Love this show I’m 22 and I think we know the predicament of the schools in America right now so I don’t mind getting a “refreshment” lesson on oxygen 😭

    • @REDv350
      @REDv350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Felt

    • @MelzFootballEditz
      @MelzFootballEditz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I love this show too! I turned 11 on Monday

    • @Corn0nTheCobb
      @Corn0nTheCobb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@REDv350 one of my favorite materials

    • @REDv350
      @REDv350 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Corn0nTheCobb word

  • @isaaclark
    @isaaclark 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    When chuck makes Neal laugh its so wholesome lol I can't help but join in 😅

  • @bigdongled3077
    @bigdongled3077 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I love Chucks dad joke banter is always one of my favorite parts of Star Talk lol

  • @thomasrussell5562
    @thomasrussell5562 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Man, Doc Tyson and Lord Nice, would have been a great addition to the Myth Busters series !
    If teachers would have taught anywhere near this effectively back in my day we all would have benefited greatly and the future would have compounded benefits abundantly!
    Y’all are great - please keep up the good works. Tom

    • @trellchargest4042
      @trellchargest4042 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Damn right

    • @Goldengirl48
      @Goldengirl48 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. If there was more laughter in education and less stress, we would not have as many kids dropping out of school.

    • @ProfPoindexter1968
      @ProfPoindexter1968 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some teachers do teach like this. You might have one if you're really, REALLY lucky!

  • @stevedoty7115
    @stevedoty7115 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I was a submariner and one of my duties was atmospheric analysis. Wish you would have hit up on pressure and O2 relationship vs pressure and our ability to live. Overall though great discussion.

    • @victroiki7321
      @victroiki7321 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for your service

  • @GeorgePap99
    @GeorgePap99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Great video as always, thank you! While hearing about how oxygen isn't flamable and how a whole place would catch fire after lighting a match in case it was, I realized how incredible of a fact this was! Then I remembered the way water turns into ice and only the top layer of a lake will freeze allowing all the fish survive during the winter for example. Are there any more incredible facts like these 2 that could make a whole mind-blowing Explainer? Greetings from Greece! :D

  • @musingsbymarco5001
    @musingsbymarco5001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm really loving these videos lately StarTalk, keep it up!

  • @vatz8341
    @vatz8341 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Okaay! The Diner Doctor has to be a recurring character on the show! HAS TO xD

  • @shaneboal1030
    @shaneboal1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    At 17 minutes into the video. Dr. Tyson mistakenly states that the insects of the Mesozoic were larger due to increased oxygen levels. It was actually the late Paleozoic that had large insects due to increased oxygen levels. Also it's my understanding that insects primarily obtain oxygen from air tube systems and not through their surface directly. Not major mistakes but accuracy matters. Thank you for all you do! ❤️

    • @margarita8442
      @margarita8442 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree

    • @vladimir5836
      @vladimir5836 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is another big mistake that runs through the whole show and that is that trees produce oxygen, this is a complete lie, although it is factually true that trees produce oxygen it is also true that trees use up all that oxygen because everything alive uses up oxygen including trees . Not only that, trees also consume oxygen at night, but at that time they do not produce oxygen at all due to the lack of photosynthesis.

    • @Nuchello
      @Nuchello ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeaaaa Wooow He has a episode on how we have oxygen !!! It's called Photosynthesis learned in 3rd grade !! Plants pull in carbon dioxide and water plus sun converts it to Sugers that feeds plants and guess what's the by product. Of that chemical reaction. Oxygen. Yeaaa if you still using the word factual. Just watch the Movie Martian with Matt Damon !!!

    • @northuniverse
      @northuniverse ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vladimir5836 this doesn't sound right. Are trees not net producers of O2?

    • @vladimir5836
      @vladimir5836 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@northuniverse Trees use up oxygen because everything alive uses up oxygen including trees. Do trees use oxygen?

  • @michaelsord6475
    @michaelsord6475 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Going through alot these days. One of my few smiles come from these guys I never miss a video thanks for the knowledge guys. Keep up the good work.

    • @fit_pharmd4830
      @fit_pharmd4830 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hope things have gotten better in the 9 months that have passed

    • @KeyBoard-io8nl
      @KeyBoard-io8nl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      like how do you apply the knowledge tho?

  • @jgraytopgun
    @jgraytopgun 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My son and I really enjoy listening to your videos on our 30 min ride taking him to school every morning!!!

  • @Coal_XVII
    @Coal_XVII 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    They finally got a sponsor !!!

  • @linedanzer4302
    @linedanzer4302 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That diner doctor voice was priceless! Please bring him back. *Often!!*

  • @patrickwalsh2361
    @patrickwalsh2361 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’ve never watched a StarTalk
    (or Cosmos) that didn’t have a new story of scientific trivia that wasn’t really interesting! Keep them coming guys!

  • @pushing2throttles
    @pushing2throttles 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Doc... keep looking up! What an awesome episode on a subject that most people think they understand. Well done sir. I learned something new. By watching the explainer series i also am relearning how to learn and how to think within a different paradigm.

  • @josemi8828
    @josemi8828 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great video guys! Could you explain the periodic table of elements next and why is the way it is?

    • @carultch
      @carultch ปีที่แล้ว

      It's complicated. Study quantum chemistry.

  • @danm3570
    @danm3570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this is great, been trying to find a quick explanation of how oxygen works and basics of our atmospheres composition

  • @tonysimons4883
    @tonysimons4883 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I love this show, Neil is one of the greats and Chuck always adds his spark to proceedings

  • @thisthespies9389
    @thisthespies9389 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Always grateful for your conversationally explaining well enough for a layman like me to understand

  • @CraigCail
    @CraigCail 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I think Chuck just solved the global warming crisis with that suggestion.

    • @dumaskhan
      @dumaskhan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      no, he didn't.

  • @johnkiefer6158
    @johnkiefer6158 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @stevestumpy6873
    @stevestumpy6873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    You could use O2 as a fuel in a stove in a 100% CH4 atmosphere.

    • @druggy1868
      @druggy1868 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why would you even need a stove the whole atmosphere will be flammable right?

    • @stevestumpy6873
      @stevestumpy6873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@druggy1868 not if there is no oxygen

    • @Chris-hx3om
      @Chris-hx3om 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, the 'methane atmosphere' is still the fuel, and the oxygen is still the oxidizer. The rules of chemistry don't change just because you change the position (or ratios) of the fuel and the oxidizer...

    • @stevestumpy6873
      @stevestumpy6873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Chris-hx3om six in one hand, 1/2 a dozen in the other.

    • @FelixEnder
      @FelixEnder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cody'sLab made a Video "Burning Oxygen In Propane Atmosphere"

  • @toddschnack3172
    @toddschnack3172 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love you guys - keep doing great work

  • @jseance
    @jseance 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Chuck you have single handily solved our current problem 🤣🤣

  • @jessngatai2384
    @jessngatai2384 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @garyblackwell3023
    @garyblackwell3023 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The consequences of cyanobacteria was a massive ice age. One of the supposed snowball earth events.

  • @WalterGreenIII
    @WalterGreenIII 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Years ago I worked in a place where we repaired commercial stoves. One morning we walked into the work shop / warehouse, flipped on the light switch. The entire warehouse from end to end flashed a blue light starting roughly knee high and flash burned from near where we stood of toward the other side of the warehouse. I happened so quick no one had a chance to respond. what had occurred is that because we did NOT have city gas lines (compress natural gas) we we instead used methane. Methane works as it has very similar properties, Although the gas going into one of the stoves we were testing was shut off at the stove, it was not shutoff at the tank. A minute leak in the line going from the tank to the stove had a previously undetected, caused the tank to empty over the week end. It filled the room, but only up to knee level. It happened so quick, we did not have time to be scared, or react except for the releaf of knowing we had not blown up, the only thing we felt was a slight warmth at knee level. The boss for his part was not angry, but slightly bemused because he had the habit of walking around turning off ALL valves at the end of the day. Somehow this one valve did not get shutoff on Friday/. All we could do all day is laugh about how cool looking the flash flame was, but also how weird and scary it was after we had all day to think about it.

  • @KernsJW
    @KernsJW 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Great episode. Never have given oxygen much thought, but you really put things into perspective. I thought at one point you were going to talk about o3. Ozone seems to have a lot of misinformation out there. Thanks for always sharing knowledge and making it fun!

    • @druggy1868
      @druggy1868 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can one breathe o3

    • @hemiolaguy
      @hemiolaguy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@druggy1868 No.

    • @trevorcorwynn1311
      @trevorcorwynn1311 ปีที่แล้ว

      Think of the term used in chemistry for burning things. Rapid Thermal Oxidation. Oxygen bonds to other molecules, and in doing so releases heat. Heat in turn excites nearby molecules, and makes it easier for oxygen to bond with them. When this happens rapidly enough, you get fire.

  • @MegaSkills9
    @MegaSkills9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A log burning in a fireplace is an example of Rapid Oxidation. Rust forming on an old car is an example of Slow Oxidation.

  • @ross350tube
    @ross350tube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    if the co2 levels were higher when that bacteria started making all that oxygen, the temperatures were probably higher too, to support the reproduction rate at such a level that it could have the impact it did.
    Considering this, maybe we can increase the heat inside a bacteria box that can also sustain those high temps while a stream of air flows through them. considering this further still, that principle could be used to introduce large amounts of oxygen to another planet, and so there's a good reason to make the bacteria able to survive in a another gas, cut the leg work for was, krypton. make the bacteria able to sustain an environment similarly enriched with krypton gas as nitrogen on earth, the density of it means it can stay inside tunnels on mars.. and because it can be output from uranium fission... and we think there's a fair bit of uranium on mars.. and if we can dig and fill the holes with a mixture of krypton and oxygen, then we can sorta actually get the ball rolling there.

    • @toreadoress
      @toreadoress 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes the Earth was much warmer before the cyanobacteria started pumping oxygen around 3 billion years ago (some sources say 3.5. Billion years, others say 2.7 so I rounded it at 3 Billion), majority of the atmosphere was CO2 and methane, which are much better insulators than Oxygen) and the whole Earth cooled down to subzero degrees because the Sun was 20-30 % weaker than it is today (it grows roughly 10 % per Billion years) and the whole Earth was what's called "Snowball Earth" from poles to the equator for hundreds of millions years with small areas around the equator where it retain liquid state like lakes. Then the sun intensity grew the more Hydrogen was fused to Helium and more volcanic activity started pumping more CO2 and the Earth began to warm up again.

    • @ross350tube
      @ross350tube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@toreadoress Fascinating, I guess air was also more dense with co2, like aluminium frying pan vs cast iron, the ability to hold heat increases with density. like a heat sync , absorbing heat from the atmosphere.

  • @evangaudet
    @evangaudet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Neil and Chuck are the perfect two people to listen to having a conversation. What wonderful goofballs.

  • @HululusLabs
    @HululusLabs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Some much needed fresh air in my TH-cam feed

  • @toniodmonio
    @toniodmonio ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is fascinating. Always love the history on how things are done.

  • @DaBlondDude
    @DaBlondDude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This was fascinating, I never knew that about the Apollo missions, just that six had been scrubbed. Now I'm wondering what replaces it in subsequent Apollo missions, etc.
    The self-regulation of plants is surprising too but makes perfect sense.
    That cyanobacteria idea sounds cool except for the problems mentioned with plants self-regulation, which might counter the process?

  • @abhi123shake
    @abhi123shake 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Always worth the wait. God bless you sir 🙏🏻

  • @AJD...
    @AJD... 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Also the increased oxygen concentration in the atmosphere will mean there's less CO2, which will stifle plants correcting the ratio of CO2 and O2

    • @AJD...
      @AJD... 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the reason why we have 3% CO2 and 21% O2 is because of the difference of their molecular mass. CO2 is way heavier than Nitrogen or oxygen so plants will little of it to make do, compared to animals who require higher concentration of lighter oxygen

  • @cinemabynihal
    @cinemabynihal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It has become my morning ritual on weekend to start with Star Talk... Love both of you guys Neil & Chuck, thanks for making this content for free. Great Stuff

  • @stevestumpy6873
    @stevestumpy6873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you remember when they visited Vulcan, and Kirk and Spock fought they talked about the thin atmosphere, and some were they talked about more gravity on Vulcan and that why they are stronger.

    • @booqueefious2230
      @booqueefious2230 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah in the episode where Kirk had to fight Spock, Bones gave Kirk a shot to boost his blood oxygen to make the fight more fair

  • @dreamrestore213
    @dreamrestore213 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chuck working extra hard to make this entire conversation seem interesting.....
    ....GIVE THAT MAN A RAISE..!!

  • @SundbyCPH
    @SundbyCPH 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I like the chemistry between these two guys🤣🤣

    • @gageguy
      @gageguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah there's an element of compatibility between them.

    • @RetNemmoc555
      @RetNemmoc555 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      These guys are a gas!

    • @gageguy
      @gageguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RetNemmoc555 But their performance is solid.

  • @rosemarienoone
    @rosemarienoone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love this! You made my day Neil & Chuck

  • @spark_two
    @spark_two 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for making science fun Neil!

  • @xtevexeairoux2637
    @xtevexeairoux2637 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great idea Chuck the CO2 scrubber I was thinking about something like that last week but I couldn't come up with what bacteria or natural means to achieve said goal. thanks Neil that was what I needed is to know that particular bacteria's name.

  • @johndaniels5226
    @johndaniels5226 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I come for the knowledge bombs, but I stay for Neil’s belly laugh. Love these guys.

  • @BlueRain508
    @BlueRain508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These explainer videos are my favorite!

  • @LexoG33
    @LexoG33 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Molecular oxygen (O2) is a reactant in combustion reactions. Oxygen is the 2nd most electronegative ("electron hungry") element in the universe. The small size of the oxygen nucleus relative to the valence electron configuration allows it to strongly attract elections from the atoms of many other elements to create covalent bonds. All this means oxygen is highly reactive.

  • @goodmorninggilw2836
    @goodmorninggilw2836 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool oxygen commentary… Chuck! You're the man bro

  • @Hendershot93
    @Hendershot93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I know you guys probably won’t read this but I freakin love Chucks commentary because (exactly like me) he knows enough of the topic for say something true but topical of a subject. Then Dr. Tyson blows his mine with the rest of ours lol. And who as an adult thought the atmosphere was only oxygen?? There is a lot of weird stuff going on in our world, what we breath is no different lol

  • @jeremyhogue780
    @jeremyhogue780 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    every time i watch this show my mind gets blown away

  • @drivewasher
    @drivewasher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The gas in your house has to be the correct ratio of gas to air(oxygen) to actually expolde /ignite. Also any dust IE coal even flour will become flamable when at the right ait mix

    • @SentinelGhost
      @SentinelGhost 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed. That's why saw mills and sugar producing factories can and have exploded

    • @steveDC51
      @steveDC51 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Custard powder is particularly dangerous - certainly not to be trifled with.

  • @TheZenbudda
    @TheZenbudda 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Actually hooper said “thats compressed air. You fool around with these things and they’ll blow up”

  • @morbidmanmusic
    @morbidmanmusic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There was on Star Trek where they had that built into there regular suit. One episode only, talked about that.

  • @timodne5741
    @timodne5741 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A special thank you to the category five🌸

  • @markpodesta4605
    @markpodesta4605 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oxygen peaked at 35% of the atmosphere during the Carboniferous period.

  • @alginperalta
    @alginperalta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A notch up on respecting Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson,
    please and thank you

  • @Slum0vsky
    @Slum0vsky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In the old Columbo TV series Nimoy/Spok once played a criminal surgeon and he smoked, I'd love to listen to him talking with dr. Diner here xD

  • @laura-ann.0726
    @laura-ann.0726 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As Dr. Tyson pointed out, CO2 and O2 are constantly being cycled back and forth between photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic life forms, and this process has been more or less in equilibrium for hundreds of millions of years (since the Cambrian, at least). But some CO2 ends up "fixed" as limestone rock, and some oxygen gets captured by exposed iron and other metals as metal oxides. Here's my question: Over the entire course of the history of Earth, past, present, and future, is the amount of oxygen available in the ecosphere slowly diminishing as some amount every year gets captured as rust by iron? There is a lot of iron in this planet - the inner core is a huge sphere of iron-nickel alloy - and as we all know, iron loves to grab onto oxygen; if that wasn't true, people living in the upper midwest would never have to worry about their cars rusting out from exposure to road salt.

  • @technician0096
    @technician0096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    There’s more oxygen in the earths crust, actually it’s the most, or one of the most abundant elements in the earths crust. Mostly found in the silicone dioxide all over our beaches… also known as “sand” and most of the other rocks here.😅 there’s more oxygen in the ground then there is in the air we breathe, and to me that’s just weird 😂

    • @MattIsntYoung
      @MattIsntYoung 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lots of oxygen in the oceans too.. wild h2o

    • @lxathu
      @lxathu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The supernova that had left its remnants of which the Solar system built up had fused a lot of iron at its core that we make use of in the core of the Earth for a magnetic field and in our hammers, but had also fused a lot of lighter elements before that and at its outer layers.
      Oxygen, nitrogen and carbon are examples for those whose fusion starts at an early stage of a huge star, after it burnt all its hydrogen into helium. Silicon is just forged together out of oxygen. This way there's a big chance that during the explosion of the ancestor star, these elements are close and when the temperature decreases to the level when chemistry can take place finally, but is big enough for the real, chemical burning to that we know much better than fusion, a lot of compounds is created participating the insane oxygen... and, btw, to our luck: carbon.

    • @enoughofthis
      @enoughofthis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Most abundant by atomic weight

    • @technician0096
      @technician0096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lxathu I wouldn’t be able to go into detail myself like you have, but I am aware of the process to some degree. Honestly, the fact I mentioned was something I needed to know for a introductory chemistry course I did 2 years ago before moving into my electrical field of study 😅

  • @WallySketch
    @WallySketch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oxygen would be flammable in a Methane based atmosphere. It's just that we don't precise in what kind of atmosphere we're talking because we only have one.

  • @akumarolls8532
    @akumarolls8532 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wondering why Sheldon never brought this up

  • @DrakiniteOfficial
    @DrakiniteOfficial ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like this was an incomplete explanation about Oxygen's role in combustion, but the anecdotes that Neil discussed were still very interesting and informative.

  • @harliiquinnstarlight
    @harliiquinnstarlight 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In regards to the rocky desert like planets that the Star Trek crewmembers were beaming down to just because that's what we were given as far as an area doesn't mean the entire planet is Desert like similar to being in the middle of the Sonoran Desert or worse yet the Saharan Desert they're still oxygen in the middle of the Sahara Desert isn't there?

    • @Dontbustthecrust
      @Dontbustthecrust 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So Picard just really likes alien deserts.

    • @harliiquinnstarlight
      @harliiquinnstarlight 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dontbustthecrust Kirk also. 😆

    • @Dontbustthecrust
      @Dontbustthecrust 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@harliiquinnstarlight that's who I actually meant to refer to but I was too lazy to correct it. Lol

  • @harvey66616
    @harvey66616 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love all the facts; an impressive density of information in such a short presentation. As usual, Tyson and Nice provide a fantastic balance in the presentation. It's pretty obvious that if Nice had decided to go into astrophysics instead of stand-up/radio/etc., he'd have given Tyson a run for his money and might have wound up the planetarium director instead! He's clearly got the smarts for it.
    That said, I was a little disappointed that the brief discussion about the methane-filled stove didn't touch on the facts that combustion requires not just the presence of oxygen and fuel, but also proper mixing and stoichiometric balance. There's a great hazard from leaking methane or propane of course, but it's theoretically possible for the gas to remain insufficiently mixed and/or in far too little or far too great a quantity to support combustion. No doubt there have been the occasional if rare lucky folks who _didn't_ get blown up in spite of a gas leak.

  • @adambomb42x
    @adambomb42x 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Mythbusters had an episode on the Jaws ending. The result was the mouth rocket.

  • @wrinkyscarnagecrew
    @wrinkyscarnagecrew 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video as always you should have brought up the fire triangle that could have helped your explanation just saying

  • @reginaromsey
    @reginaromsey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the info about Cyanobacteria!

  • @zl_neptune_lz7428
    @zl_neptune_lz7428 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Indeed is actually how I got my first job. They take good care of me and wrote me back fast. It truly works. Seriously, give it a try. It's wonderful.

  • @richardfarlow1955
    @richardfarlow1955 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the issues cited in the final accident report on the Apollo 1 fire cited the overuse of velcro. They had been warned about overusing the flammable material by the manufacturer.

  • @katalyst4stem
    @katalyst4stem ปีที่แล้ว

    15:10 Actually, i beg to differ. If there are more trees, spewing out more oxygen .... then, those trees have also removed more CO2 from the atmosphere (i know, the water vapour argumnent .... but equimolar concentrations of both are released in plant respiration and water vapour in atmosphere has a much shorter 1/2 life). So, overall IMO there will be a cooling effect, leading to lesser instances of forest fires.

  • @NotTheEx
    @NotTheEx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The bad thing about your videos is that I constantly have to rewind them to catch the parts I missed because I was laughing too hard to hear another word. LOL

  • @beatsbyduffy9763
    @beatsbyduffy9763 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    lover the 20 min explainers

  • @69jpil69
    @69jpil69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am surprised Neil Tyson implied NASA constructed space capsules with flammable materials. Everything in the capsule was tested for flammability... at standard oxygen levels. However, some of the materials, like the Velcro specifically designed for NASA to keep things in place during flight, were flammable at 100% oxygen. Sometimes even NASA misses things that are obvious only after the fact.
    Also, what kept the hatch closed wasn't the normal cabin pressure, but the excessive pressure from the heat and gasses from the fire itself. And the reason the hatch couldn't be opened was because it opened inward. Had the door opened outward, there would have been no problem. In fact, the original Mercury hatches opened outward with explosive bolts. However, during the second Mercury flight's splashdown, the explosive bolts wen off prematurely, losing the hatch in the ocean. This allowed seawater to flood and sink the capsule, Liberty Bell 7, and nearly drowned the astronaut. To avoid future problems, NASA eliminated the explosive bolts, and changed the hatch to open inward. By so doing, they unwittingly doomed the Apollo 1 crew to a fiery death.
    The final irony to this sad tale is, the astronaut on Liberty Bell 7 who nearly drowned because of its outward opening hatch, was Gus Grissom, one of the three Appollo 1 crew who burned to death inside the Apollo 1 capsule because of its inward opening hatch.

  • @Danceofmasks
    @Danceofmasks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I looked at the thumbnail and thought, "O is only worth one ... wait ... that's the element, not the scrabble piece"

  • @raytaylor8381
    @raytaylor8381 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have more questions now. Every explanation brings new questions. I could spend a life time asking questions. 😊

  • @GeoHvl
    @GeoHvl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The big O. US Navy had a fire fighting school. Lots of demonstrations on Oxygen along with Magnesium, and every type of fuel used. Classes on fighting these fires.

  • @wisnog99
    @wisnog99 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love that indeed sponsored you guys! I love indeed, I got jobs from indeed before and I landed my career off indeed!

  • @crisscrossam
    @crisscrossam 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Although this wasn't stated directly in the episode, but if you think about it, it makes sense:
    The reason candles/stoves/etc. Burn at certain rates isn't just due to how much gas they have access to, but also how much oxygen they have access to, because if a candle had access to more oxygen and less nitrogen from the air it would burn brighter and hotter and would get consumed more quickly. If a gas stove somehow sent gas and the tube was connected to another tank with oxygen feeding where the gas comes out and the fire is sustained, you'd have to open up the gas more to keep a sustainable flame and of course that flame would also be a lot hotter.

  • @fasilharer1291
    @fasilharer1291 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally Star talk

  • @danmcbride1478
    @danmcbride1478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good stuff but I’m surprised Neil didn’t mention O2 is an oxidizer. And how chemical reactions rely on it for combustion/oxidation.

  • @skeptickhan4239
    @skeptickhan4239 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Neil & Chuk are the best scientific combo, keep on producing the quality content. Appreciated ❤

  • @nickelsin7170
    @nickelsin7170 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The part that trips me out is the fact that we need Oxygen to survive. We use it to deteriorate slowly, whilst regenerating. It is responsible for the dead skin flakes that come off of you, as well as the new skin being generated underneath. It's like a nail that is slowly rusting away on the outside, but also generating a new nail structure underneath, so it never really disintegrates... until it finally quits using the Oxygen altogether. Then it succumbs to the Oxygen.

  • @DmytroHolub
    @DmytroHolub 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the show and science! :)

  • @Kualinar
    @Kualinar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I heard of Apollo 1, because I was there when it burnt. Younger peoples rarely new anything about it. During that test, it was pure oxygen at normal atmospheric pressure. Now, when they use pure oxygen, it's at 17 to 20% of atmospheric pressure.
    In Jaws, to explode as it did, the tank would need to be pressurized at almost it's rupture point.

  • @Eltoca21
    @Eltoca21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1) Are there known examples of fossilized animals that lived just fine in the previous carbon dioxide rich atmosphere on earth before cyanobacteria?
    2) How do you pressurize for example a diving tank with a gas e.g. how do you force more gas into a confined space than it could hold under non pressurized conditions, and does the pressurized gas change in any way? I'm probably not wording this well but hopefully someone will understand what I'm trying to get at.

    • @SereneAncalime
      @SereneAncalime 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To question number 2.
      With a pump.
      Think of your air pump for your bike or car tyres. They are doing exactly the same putting gas into what well become a pressurised container.
      Its the same principle just scaled up.

  • @rvowave3227
    @rvowave3227 ปีที่แล้ว

    The self correcting part is just mind blowing on the level I never knew. 14:21