Haha thank you!! :) I wish it goes well for me, there have been many points where i was like, should i actually do this or not, but for now i’m going strong haha
@@calm_opportunity ye, I always find it interesting to see other people's journey in life even if it's not related to me I can always learn some life lessons from them
If you're lucky enough to do so, I think you should pursue a graduate degree because you love philosophy. But be open to the big possibility that you might not become a professor, meaning you would've spent a minimum of 5 years (if in the US)--investing time, energy, and forgoing money--working on a project for your PhD that leads to nowhere in particular. On a side note, which topics and which philosophers do you enjoy most?
Watching and listening to your video gives me ideas about your personality type that might be interesting for you to explore. I suggest that you take the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from a local counseling office, then study the result and the Jungian theory supporting it. It may be that you are an INTP, which is a good result for the interests you have expressed. Not being enamored of math, physics, and computer science, each of which expresses itself in short statements called equations, and favoring writing in longer whole sentences, as in the case of philosophical essays, suggests you are more comfortable with natural languages rather than mathematical ones. Perhaps you should explore long term work as a creative writer -- a journalist, an essayist, a novelist, or some other work with words. Ability and interest in philosophy are good predictive indicators for success in the law profession.
@@ocean34560 Your comment is a grammatical failure as an attempt at communication. For example, your use of "ironic" is incorrect, "your" should be you're as a contraction, "peace" is incorrect diction, and should be piece, "that" should be who, and "peoples" should be "a person's." If you intend to persist with use of English as a public language, you should at least make a significant effort to improve your knowledge of the language. Not calling people rude names, and not jumping to illogical conclusions are two further improvements you may make.
I would argue that you can conbine computer science and philosophy in a meaningful way. You should look into cognitive science. Cognitive scince is an interdisciplinary field which combines among other things biology, psychology, computer science, anthropology, neuroscience, linguistics, AI- research and even philosophy. Many of the theories, questions and major problems in cognitive science emerge from the western philosophical tradition and more specifically from phenomenology and philosophy of mind and language. (Mind body problem, transcendental idealism, the issue about the relation between the objective reality and our subjective perseption, how does language represent "reality", intentionality of consciousness, qualias, ethical questions about the moral status of consciouss beings, can AI be consciouss and be a subject of moral worth? ) Cognitive science tries to answer these questions by conbining many relatet subjects whom essentially study the same thing, the consept of a mind. Cognitive science in practice is weary technology and programming based. Among other things it studies human an machine interaction and how human minds prosess information. Studing cognitive science can for example prepare you for a lucrative career as an UI/UX-designer in a software company.
Of course you can combine computer science and philosophy. I wasn't trying to degrade computer science in any way though; it's just that I tried it out, and I didn't like it. For the philosophy of mind problems, although they are interesting, they never really interested me at a deep level. Perhaps that will change later, but as of now, I am not really interested in them. Nonetheless, thank you for the reply :)
*Me at 2am randomly seeing this on TH-cam and clicking this as an electrical engineer with no thought of pursuing philosophy*: ah hmm yes interesting
Also good for you for doing what you love and good luck in career. Seems like you thought about it a lot
Haha thank you!! :) I wish it goes well for me, there have been many points where i was like, should i actually do this or not, but for now i’m going strong haha
@@calm_opportunity ye, I always find it interesting to see other people's journey in life even if it's not related to me I can always learn some life lessons from them
Philosophy looks at the world like an impartial observer. But we humans need to act, change the world! Hegelians of the world, UNITE!
thanks for this video !
If you're lucky enough to do so, I think you should pursue a graduate degree because you love philosophy. But be open to the big possibility that you might not become a professor, meaning you would've spent a minimum of 5 years (if in the US)--investing time, energy, and forgoing money--working on a project for your PhD that leads to nowhere in particular. On a side note, which topics and which philosophers do you enjoy most?
Watching and listening to your video gives me ideas about your personality type that might be interesting for you to explore. I suggest that you take the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from a local counseling office, then study the result and the Jungian theory supporting it. It may be that you are an INTP, which is a good result for the interests you have expressed.
Not being enamored of math, physics, and computer science, each of which expresses itself in short statements called equations, and favoring writing in longer whole sentences, as in the case of philosophical essays, suggests you are more comfortable with natural languages rather than mathematical ones. Perhaps you should explore long term work as a creative writer -- a journalist, an essayist, a novelist, or some other work with words. Ability and interest in philosophy are good predictive indicators for success in the law profession.
the most ironic thing about this comment is that it exposed that your an absolute peace of shit that thinks you can read peoples personality
@@ocean34560 Your comment is a grammatical failure as an attempt at communication. For example, your use of "ironic" is incorrect, "your" should be you're as a contraction, "peace" is incorrect diction, and should be piece, "that" should be who, and "peoples" should be "a person's."
If you intend to persist with use of English as a public language, you should at least make a significant effort to improve your knowledge of the language. Not calling people rude names, and not jumping to illogical conclusions are two further improvements you may make.
@@KMMOS1 more narcissism. thanks for proving my point
@@ocean34560 More incompetence; ditto.
I would argue that you can conbine computer science and philosophy in a meaningful way. You should look into cognitive science. Cognitive scince is an interdisciplinary field which combines among other things biology, psychology, computer science, anthropology, neuroscience, linguistics, AI- research and even philosophy. Many of the theories, questions and major problems in cognitive science emerge from the western philosophical tradition and more specifically from phenomenology and philosophy of mind and language. (Mind body problem, transcendental idealism, the issue about the relation between the objective reality and our subjective perseption, how does language represent "reality", intentionality of consciousness, qualias, ethical questions about the moral status of consciouss beings, can AI be consciouss and be a subject of moral worth? )
Cognitive science tries to answer these questions by conbining many relatet subjects whom essentially study the same thing, the consept of a mind.
Cognitive science in practice is weary technology and programming based. Among other things it studies human an machine interaction and how human minds prosess information. Studing cognitive science can for example prepare you for a lucrative career as an UI/UX-designer in a software company.
Of course you can combine computer science and philosophy. I wasn't trying to degrade computer science in any way though; it's just that I tried it out, and I didn't like it. For the philosophy of mind problems, although they are interesting, they never really interested me at a deep level. Perhaps that will change later, but as of now, I am not really interested in them. Nonetheless, thank you for the reply :)