@@globalpropertyinvestment lol, stupid as stupid does. The US has full capabilities to destroy all Chinese military shipyards. China does not have any capacity to touch US pacific bases let alone touching US shipyards in mainland US.
Ohh this is a video that is long time coming. I have been waiting for something like this. In a total war and let's hope it never comes to that, it's not just your current assets that matter, it is also your entire industrial capacity and your existing infrastructure on whether they can replenish losses and consumables, and repair damaged assets quickly. Understanding a country's military capability must include understanding its industrial war material capacity. Thanks for making this video. Now I'm gonna watch it. Haha... I need a cheat sheet for all the ship types.
24:27 interesting to see the size difference between the Type 054A FFG (440' long/4,000+ tons) and the Type 056A FSG (300' long/1,500+ tons). The difference in size is more than I expected.
Yet another outstandingly researched & high qual vid. The mention of the fusion of the burgenong civil ship-building industry with the naval is valuable and bearing in mind c's accomplishments and ambitions in civil shipbuilding, the overall economies in scale and their synergy are impressive.. I had assummed the Hudong-Zhonghua complex was the biggest naval shipyard given the investment/expansion over the years but interesting to hear it is the dalian yshipyard (& their multiple buildling of the Type 55) Not sure any other site has carried this level and quality of analysis on this topic. All lean meat, no flab. Nice1
*As of 2021, China has over 3000+ shipbuilding yards,* -- 529 shipyards are capable of building ship of 10,000+ tons above -- 56 capable of building 100,000+ tons above ships (the average size of US AIRCRAFT carriers is about 100,000 tons) --30 capable of building 300,000+ tons above ships (almost TRIPLE the size of US AIRCRAFT carriers!) -And 6 Super shipyards capable of building half a million tons vessels(!!) (almost FIVE times the size of US Aircraft carrier) All can produce warships in a week. Every year China builds thousands of various kinds of new ships. China ship building industry produces over half of the entire world ship production by tonnage.
@@cabasadefogo9533 The total tonnage of ships built by the United States in 2022 is 600000 tons. In 2022, the total tonnage of Chinese-built ships is close to 40 million tons. But 2022 is not the year with the largest shipbuilding volume in China, with 76.65 million tons in 2011. During World War II, the total tonnage of ships built in the United States was nearly 14 million tons.
It would be important to go over civilian shipyards a bit as well, since they are the true monster of Chinese shipbuilding industry. Waigaowiao shipyard for example, is nearly twice the size of Jiangnan and ship they can build complex vessels like modern cruise ships and LNG ships, they would have no problem producing naval ships should they get the contracts for it. Though at the end of day, china naval build up is not really limited by shipbuilding cpacity, but by subsystems and personale due a lack of mobilization, which for the sake of world peace is a good thing.
If all shipyards were to stop commercial production, China has the capability to immediately churn out new naval vessels within weeks and larger naval vessels within month. These days vessels are all built in modular style.
I think this capability are very underestimate by western analysis. That why i think in case a war between US, china will win in long run because they have very huge industrial capacity
according to the chinese military expert,these factory only running on 15 -30 % workload, incase there is a war they can switch to full work of 100% and 200% 24/7
@@Fauzanarief-n7i China imports 70% of it's iron ore from Australia. Australia is one of Americas biggest allies. In times of war, China imports will be completely cut off by blockade so whatever domestic iron ore will be diverted to ammunition, not naval asset or land and air asset. If the Chinese could import from Russia or anywhere else, they would of already. China loses the long run by a mile.
Interesting !!! Much of CHINA submarine and tech are NOT knwn to the West . My guess is U S knows that it has LACK behind to CH INA subm arine abilities since 2015. Believe that new Su bmar ines can CARRY Hy perso nic Miss les. 🤯🤯
no comparison needed, its not on same level, china shipyards are world largest and most advanced ship yard, , while the gap is too big for US and russia, like 100 years behind
@@xinyiquan666 Not true! While China has some big big shipyards so does the US. And it is pretty clear that China is not making neither the largest nor the most advanced ships in the world. They are making lots of ships tho. And yet the amount of ships in tonnage compared to Korea is about the same. So in terms of the bigger ships SK is making more bigger ships than China.
So what do you reckon they are capable of all at once. At least 5 destroys and 5 frigates plus 2 carriers and many submarine all able to be simultaneously produced?
Because recent escalations of the clash of empires and NATO sponsored/directed military actions inside the former USSR, China will be ramping up both military production capacity and military production rates. This means any estimates of current production rates will be accelerated with multiple shifts and increased feeder subsystems & subassembly facilities. Also when Xi recently spoke concerns for new college graduate employment, I expect R & D efforts to ramp up. This means many more variants to quickly be prototyped for both ships and subsystems, plus developing new military technologies.
Mother fucker. The Chinese aren’t stupid enough to buy into Russian propaganda. The last thing NATO wanted was to provoke Russia into doing something stupid. If NATO’s plan was to get Russia to invade Ukraine, why didn’t they have contingencies in place for losing access to Russian gas? Why did they have to search far and wide for Soviet equipment that the Ukrainians had the infrastructure to use while they worked to get them in a situation where they could use donated NATO stock? Why didn’t they just train them on that in the first place? How was UA on the verge of joining NATO when NATO doesn’t allow countries w/ territorial disputes to even apply for membership? If preventing the possibility of UA joining NATO was the goal, they achieved it…in 2014. And don’t tell me NATO’s Freshest, Finland is somehow less of a threat than a hypothetical NATO w/ UA. China didn’t want this war anymore than NATO. Russia was supposed to provide a massive resource bank for China to point to and draw upon in the event of war. But now, because of Putin’s catastrophically dumb ass, it’s an open question on whether there will even be a Russian state on which China can rely.
So, where does the energy come from?... I mean, it's not like blackouts happen, especially in the winter.. so it must be so great it can deliver the energy and food needs, right? But I don't think many countries want to compare. And, I also heard about the scam China did with 5g. Pretty much downgrading 4g and presenting 4g as 5g. Had the same speeds posted by netizens. Idk if they improved it now, but if they did, primarily in wealthy areas, but definitely not every part of China.
You already forgot those war factory from u.s and europe... 😂😂😂 Far more advance naval shipyard hahaha korean and japanese can match that too... Lol...😊
We must take note of our great technological gap in shipbuilding technology compared to the great united states of america. Their Dellan shipyard are building 2 DDG-55 class cruisers and 5 DDG-52 class destroyers at the same time, while the Southdelta shipyard is building CVN-3 super carrier. We can only build trash can littoral fishing boats that were already retired not even after 10 years of service. Respect!
Littoral got retired before even enter services or combat ready. But worry not, China don't have modern combat experiences (from common American clown )
The biggest *DISADVANTAGE* that the US Navy has is *TONNAGE* .The new Chinese warships are all designed to be slim and light, travelling further and carrying more payloads whilst reducing fuel consumption. The US Warships are aged, rust buckets, antiquated and they are much heavier making them much less fuel efficient. We wouldn't use "tonnage" as a metric when it comes to measuring the state of military personnel, since a large tonnage would be a sign of poor health and obesity, how anyone can apply that metric to the US Navy and call it an advantage is beyond logic!
@@richarddavis8394 the point of the modern navy is to have stealth and high tech radar detection to prevent being hit to begin with, which is why they are lighter to travel faster
the only ship in the US navy that has this 'overweight' problem is the LCS and Zumwalts which are woefully undergunned for their weight. but the other surface combatants are still decently well armed.
their starting point was high - starting with Ukraine's engines tech, and improve from there. They should easily be in a leading position now after 30 years of digestion.
Their conventional steam turbine engine/gas turbine engine is first tier, might not be the best but not far from it. As for nuclear power, it’s still unclear. Nuclear submarines are too secretive to tell, China hasn’t built any surface nuclear power warships.
I expect China to lead the world in incorporating lessons learned into future systems being procured. Especially drones of all sizes and purposes, drone swarms, long range low cost precision munitions (e.g. larger bore longer barrel artillery with steerable shells), plus defensive measures against the new offensive capability (decoys, camoflauge, active close in defense, etc). I also expect a general shift towards undersea boats/ships (surface ships are too vulnerable to detection and attack).
@@gelinrefira Relocate to accommodate a larger shipyard, otherwise there won't be enough factory space. Jiangnan Shipyard was established over a hundred years ago, and its location in Shanghai is equivalent to Manhattan Island in New York City.
@@gelinrefira the short answer is no, the long answer is that the shipyard was in the center of the city, there was already plan to move it out completely.
I imagine China producing low cost subs designed to provide survivable capability of DF-27 missiles that operate very close to Chinese shore, where they are well protected from detection and attack. Such subs would surface to launch (their missiles are thus identical to land based missiles). Low cost Subs not requiring high speed, no long duration missions, only shallow depth operation, and reliant of regional protection instead of on board systems. I expect coastal control of all undersea activity would be watertight out to 50 miles from shore.
Hi, my names Doug and I’ve never heard of dimensions. Furthermore, I like to run my mouth about things I clearly haven’t tried to understand. I see missiles on trucks and boldly ask why those trucks not underwater trucks. I have big brain. Doctors call it “swollen” and complement me about my “hemorrhage.” They so jealous of my brain size. Everyday they urge me to come see them at their hospital. I tell them they are slackers and if they want to see me so bad why don’t they do it after work? What if we defended the South China Sea using sharks, with freaking laser beams on their heads?
@@williambrasky3891 mobile launch trucks are a survivability feature. Undersea launch platforms take survivability to the next level. Regarding South China Sea and other bases far from the mainland, survivability of mobile launch trucks on a small island is dubious
@@douginorlando6260 Im sure the crew would love that. But in all seriousness if china were to put hypersonic glide weapons on a sub, they would convert an SSBN to fire them. those have silos big enough to fit.
Jokes on you, US doesn’t have commercials shipyards anymore. They are all gone, China and South Korea ship builder sent their US counter part into the grave.
$US1500-2000 a month for a typical craft. accommodation and lunch is generally provided, they typically work 13 day fortnights, 10hr shifts. PPP its better than working in a US shipyard lol. Staff gets paid a little higher, they would have own accommodation nearby. The usual public holidays and shutdown for Chinese new year, and double bubble for public holidays. Insurance, 401k equivalent etc are all on top of the pay. It isn't bad cause they are in demand and labor mobility between yards is quite common. They are ahead not cause of cheap labor, but continuity of work on top of the work ethics that allows for continuous improvement and productivity gains. Comparing the productivity between the countries and its no contest....
@@Praetorian157A actually not really. Shanghai and Guangzhou are really, really expensive places.. the dorms and cheap food is a draw card to balance the costs. The wages gotta keep up with living expenses in the area.. people go where the $$$ is.
Control over the fundamental forces of production is everything. This is most represented by the military-industrial complex, which is the "first-derivative" of a nation's macroeconomy. Ostensibly under direct control of the State and her entire resources/labor productivity. The shipbuilding industry is a key indicator of well the State can wield these fundamental forces. China's shipyards is but one facet of the scale of manufacturing and coordination throughout the economy. In a larger sense, China's development is because the CPC is able to organize labor and balance interests at the State level. That is to say the CPC becomes the supra-union for all labor interests. While China's development model uses profits as an indicator of competitiveness, it's state owned companies are not beholden to them, and instead pursue scale and labor productivity as the benchmark. This video x1000 can be applied to all sectors of China's economy: nuclear power, solar, hydroelectric, power transmission, ports, high-speed rail, civil engineering (HMZB anyone?), etc, etc.
The chinese shipbuilding capacity is equal to the total of the rest world, and the cost of a chinese navy vessel is about 1/3 of a same level US one. When US Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro ensured on CNN that all chinese most sophisticated navy ships are built by "slaves", I knew that US navy would not have any chance to encounter the raise of its chinese rival.😂😂😂
Cnn is correct, china large ship builder are build with slave- I do believe they dont paid robot cutter and welder any wage only feed them with electric 🤣🤣🤣🤣dont we all love CNN logic
Russia does not have the ability to manufacture warships, Russia since the day of founding haven't bulid any medium or large warships, all their warships are the legacy of the Soviet Union
This is a crucial video on Chinese naval modernization, albeit a mere introduction, outlining public sources. If I were the Chinese, I would utilize the large, mountaineous island of Hainan not just as a naval station for the Southern Fleet, but also as a forward shipyard to construct, maintain and launch submarines, covertly from international spectators. I can't tell if that is technically feasible - hauling the necessary material from the mainland under *a strategem* of modernizing Hainan - but the historical analogy would be *the German military campaign into Norway in 1940 ('Operation Weser Exercise') with the sole objective to spread German submarines from being trailed by British destroyers after leaving German harbours* , forcing the Royal Navy to disperse in consequence...
@@directxxxx71 "Hainan Island is meant to be Miami of US with Aerospace industry (...)" That may well be so. I - admittingly - _speculated_ about a plausible dual use that will remain classified.
Building carriers are extremely complex. China is the only nation outside US that can build one independently. The arresting cables to stop jets on deck are too complex, and only US & China can build that system. Besides those big specialty drydock, specialty steels, machine tools are difficult to make.
Three things- 1-can you do a vid on if Japan can survive a war against China? 2-And even with all this,the west and Japan will still underestimate China and think they can beat China in like seven hours(the U.S especially) 3-Can the U.S really beat China easily?
That answer was given long ago in the Korean Peninsula. The US + the entire UN forces, fought China for 3 years, under the weapons parity of 1:10 in favor of the UN forces, barely fought China to a standstill. And today the weapons parity is likely at 1:2, and 2:1 for some areas, while China has moved from zero defense industry in the 1950s, to probably the largest defense compound in the world today. Your question is pretty much moot. And trust me, if the US can defeat China in 7 hours, this would have been done in the 1990s before China's takeoff to become what it is today. The Judeo-Anglo think tanks will constantly measure their military options in defense of their economic interest.
I don’t know where you get that 7 hours thing but it’s truly stupid. US fought 7+ years in southern Vietnam for one reason; to contain China and communism. If US could finish China off in couple hours why bother with Vietnam?
1 Japanese in its current state wouldn’t survive a war with China. It’s trade routes almost entirely under Chinese control. Japanese home islands are too small; population, industry and infrastructure are concentrated in a few major cities. Destroying those infrastructure would not be difficult, blockade is also not difficult. If both happens, Japanese will starve to death.
3. the question you need to ask is can USA really beats China. Has China already grown to a point, it’s no longer possible to defeat China without wiping out human civilization (aka nuclear annihilation) along with it. I think the answer is yes. What you are fighting here is World second largest economy, second largest country by population and largest industrial capacity on earth. Maybe get use to the fact USA won’t be the only superpower in the game.
The shipbuidling industry in China is probably their most impressive indusrty. Currently in scale it is only rivaled by SK. China is probably the nation with the second largest potential to built ships behind the US. The US coasts are simply give more potential to make ships. That's why the US has so many major ports and terminals. The US is also the nation with the biggest amount of shipyards in the world tho they are much smaller than the Chinese. But the Chinese shipbuilding industry is incredible! America have started investing more into their military shipbuilding capabilities. Something that had to start long long time ago. The removing of the subsidies for the US shipbuilding industry was one of the greatest blunders of their history IMO. Countries like China, Japan and SK replaced them and not China is capable of outproducing the US even in the militaary side of things. It will take many many years before America can outproduce China again. But the potential is there.
LMAO no. A country like SK with a tiny coastline has one of the largest shipbuilding industries in the world. Technology, investment, and consistent government support are the determinants of shipbuilding prowess, not coastline length. The only "potential" there for the US is national disintegration.
The Largest US ships Production output is on 1940-1945, Where US Build total 7,601 Ship per year, Thats 1,520 Ship per year in All Vessel from Naval,Oil Tanker and Merchant Vessel and it was peaked of US Industry because at that time its grueling by War... On the other hand, China Build 1,500 Ship Per year average from 2012 Only for Commercial and have straight 10 years build 1,500 Ship and also on modern time is fastest naval building ship in peacetime, And the difference, US do that because peak WW2 while China is just commercial, Meaning if China turn to Mobilizing Economy War, Its will be gargantuan.. Add enough, China start building Ship on A.I and Lesser Labour needed
@@alinux09 and you assume China got off lightly? lolol… their crematoria are fully booked for the next 3 months and they have stopped counting covid deaths 🤣🤣🤣
Thank you very much for the informative programme. I appreciate your attempts to pronounce the Chinese names of various entities correctly. However, I hope that you can do away with some Chinese names being pronounced in their western, romanised manner. Pronouncing Chinese names correctly can help avoid wrongly associating places with names. Thank you.
Its all for show. China's navy does not have a network of foreign bases to be effective overseas operations. But in littoral waters China can certainly deliver a LOT of firepower against foreign historically agressive powers. Dalian was was occupied by foreign powers in the historical past - NEVER AGAIN.
In the early days, most Chinese shipyards produced an inferior vessels unless strict quality and super visionary controls were put into place. I have been on many vessels built in Chinese yards which were very poorly completed. with in many cases having the delivery crews correcting the shipyard mistakes. These shipyards can do very good work but they must be supervised. What Western clients tend to do is place a supervisory staff who have final say on how everything is done. Including making major structural changes if required. Also in the early 90's we had two naval architects FROM DALIAN SHIPYARD do time at the Australian Maritime College's ship research laboratory running amongst others the towing tank where hull resistance and underwater characteristics were measured. This place was also instrumental in developing the winged keel for the America's cup win for AUSTRALIA II .
Diesel-Electric AIP Subs works better for the PLAN since the sea surrounding China and Taiwan Strait are shallow. Hence why they're the navy with the most Diesel-Electric AIP Subs in the world right now.
@@melwyn789 exactly any American sub entering the Taiwan strait is literally committing suicide. They are way too large to hide in such shallow waters. I would not be surprised if half of them actually just destroy themselves trying to maneuver and crashing into a sea mount
Imma waiting for USA to sanction Chinese SHIPYARD, as its dual engineering expertise is a DANGER to US National intrest... Ohh, plsssss.. sanction these yard... LoL
These facilities will likely be targeted if Americans decide to intervene in Taiwan or SCS (They might merge into a single Pacific war). The Americans didn't purchase 12000 JASSM's just to put them in storage. China needs to have proper air defenses set up in vital military and research installations. Perhaps more importantly, it needs to develop the ability to retaliate against American facilities as well. Conflicts are more likely when one side think they cannot be touched.
Na, nobody would attack those shipyards. Just like nobody is daring to hit Russian ammo factories or tank factories. We all know where they are but nobody would risk an escalation with a nuclear power. You retards better keep that in mind. China also has hundreds of ballistic missiles able to hit US shipyards. Would you risk you and your family being blown up into pieces? You might not care cause you are retarded but the smarter politician and businessman wouldn’t want that.
target by who? if us target them, then china wiill target Usa infrasture, they have hypersonic miissile for that now question is would Usa dare to target these? and pull it in full blown war
Good luck trying to get the plane into JASSM firing range with DF series missiles raining down hell into your carriers or air bases though. The US still doesn't have countermeasures against Hypersonics which China have plenty of.
@@melwyn789 The new JASSM-EX has a range of 1900km, Americans can launch their bombers from Hawaii or even continental US with air refuelling. This is a real and present threat, not something to be dismissed. Also, you will need continuous missile strikes to keep US bases suppressed, otherwise they can be operational again shortly after repairs.
With the rapid modernization of Chinese Military, Taiwan should also enhance its coastal defense force by acquiring/building large numbers of coastal submarines(120-500 tons displacement), shored based anti-ship missile batteries, fast missile boats, fast mine layer ships, drones (surveillance, combat, and kamikaze), mobile artilleries, ATGMs, and layered ground air defense systems. These platforms will compliment each other in order to form a defensive solid stance. I bet no admiral in any nation's navy will dare to conduct amphibious operation of Taiwan. And if China will approach blockade, I think it would be better for the government of Taiwan to let their citizen store some basic necessities such as food and water for a duration of 1-2 years.
Truth is China don't even need this navy for Taiwan if you want to talk crazy in this way. Taiwan is such a short distance away that with the industrial capacity of China they can just pump out and rain cheap missiles across the entirety of Taiwan 24/7 for ages until it's just a burned up lump of charcoal. But that's not China's goal. They want reunification and not scorched earth.
How many kilometers do you think a 120-500-ton submarine can go out of port to fight independently? During the Taiwan Strait war, there will be early warning aircraft in the sky, dozens of destroyers at sea, and nuclear-powered attack submarines in the sea. These pocket submarines are not as useful as mine tubes.
Impressive, at least youve given the Taiwanese, Japanese, the Americans and South Koreans proximity specific targets to geolocate their missiles and aircraft AGM mission sorties in the event of a Chinese war with QUAD, AUKUS, South Korea, Japan and other anti Chinese neighbours. 🤣
Well, the location of these facilities is no secret to begin with, and neither is what they build. The most I did is to draw attention to them for people that don't know.
@@EurasiaNaval Of course, your OSINT is very educational for my personal education on Chinese capabilities and giving a more informed level of respect as a Samoan Australian and as a Pacific Islander in awe of American and the nascency of the Chinese Blue Water fleet which I, as a Samoan, do not feel intimidated with the Chinese Multipolarity new world order headed by BRICS and the SCO, which may also ask for a Blue Water port from a South Pacific Island State, like Samoa. I would regard that multupolarity is economically beneficial for the world we live and to proffer a more balanced world not bullied by Eurocentrism and American Hegemonic bullying via their purported impartial rule of law. It is very partial to the former Colonial and Imperial powers. I personally have an aversion for Colonialism although I am thankful for the legacy of Colonialism for globalisation, interactivity, mutual trade, cultural exchange, and shared wealth. Multipolarity world order will place a check and balance upon a lethargic and lopsided world order with privileged more developed economies primarily from Europe and North America dominating the rule of law parameters undermining the less equal, struggling and emerging economies such as the fledgling Pacific Island Nations, Caribbean, African continent, Asia, Gulf States, and Central and South American States. Each developing Nations endeavours to improve their lot as best they can. China has offered their carrot on a sticj Belt and Road Initiative, and although there are strings attached, the Chinese have given many developing fragile economies a little boast and a hand up in improving their domestic infrastructures and domestic governance. Samoans, as well as other Pacific Islands have gain a lot from the Chinese. In return, the Chinese need friends, albeit, very few of them. Taiwan also has a need for friends but, since China has actually proposed a speed rail link under the Taiwan Strait, you can see how they have envisioned the One China Policy to include the former KMT Nationalists back into the fold since 1949. The One China Policy sees China and Taiwan in a much bigger ambitious perspective that will enhance China in their global posture as a super power. Korea too has lacked this vision unlike Vietnam which had dismissed the ideological division of the Macarthy Domina theory and has realised that National unity and identity was more important than ideodolical dogma. But, back to the rapid Chinese military build up which is also in par with the Chinese cvivilian and commercial infrastructural development along a Macroeconomic Keynesian think big vision by the Chinese Government that also includes global developments in other countries, which scares the shit out of Americans and Europeans. This is very good for the rest of us and that multipolarity seems like a very good alternative to American Hegemony especailly in light of the response to the Ukrainian crisis by putting out the fire by throwing fuel into the conflict by the weapons industry complex in America. In saying that, the Chinese are scaring the Americans every single day as more and more new weapons and warships roll out of the shipyards, more Satellites are laucnhed into space, more cars are rolled out of the factories, more megastructures are completed, more bridges, new skyscrapers are built and new cities are appearing in the middle of a desert, or new islands appearing from the depths of the vast empty oceans, you can only sit back and be amazed with how the Chinese thinks.
No one in East Asia is anti-China. Not even Japan and SK and certainly not SE Asia. No one wants to see war breaking out and everyone knows it is the US provoking conflict in this region. The more US tries to provoke a war here, the more desperate they really are. China doesn't want to dominate the world or any colonial imperialist bullshit you are projecting, they just want to be left alone to do their thing and trade but if you think China is gonna just meekly accept being bullied around, you are going to be in a nasty surprise. Kindly fuck off with your warmongering.
@@TimBrianTufuga Hey, thanks for the taking the time to respond like that. I read your entire reply. I enjoyed hearing about your background as a Samoan. I thought you are from the Pacific Islands, but not sure which country that is - now I know!
Hell China through up massive skyscrapers in half the time aswell but by god if chinas skyscrapers are anything to go on then chinas naval forces are in serious trouble as basically China is shine over shit, I’ve been hearing about problems with every Chinese weapons systems from tanks to missiles to helicopters jet fighters and apcs made from none bullet resistant armour and the ships will be no different, these fleets of Chinese warships are paper warriors, nothing works on them and even worse chinese personnel to operate the ships are a possible even worse concern as they have no trained techies to run the ships and keep them fighting, all window show just as everything else in China
![일상 속 기분 좋음 [Proto disco meme]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DwmEIaZ7XGQ/mqdefault.jpg)
The industrial capacity of China is breath taking 🎉 it would be cool if you did a comparison video of the shipyards in US.
That video would be under 10 seconds so would qualify as a TikTok video.
There’s no comparison
@@globalpropertyinvestment lol, stupid as stupid does. The US has full capabilities to destroy all Chinese military shipyards. China does not have any capacity to touch US pacific bases let alone touching US shipyards in mainland US.
They are a sleeping giant, their potential wartime capacity hasn't even been tested yet
It is more fair to compare China and the entire G7
As one from Dalian, I remember watching the aircraft carriers in the shipyard and the dock from home window
Da Li An
@@yaoshan-q8e lol
住东港的邻居吗哈哈
里奥宁州的达里安造船厂吗😂
朋友，我是美国网友，希望能和你相互认识🐶
That is one outstanding video, thanks ENI! And China did all that in 20 years too!!! Wow!!!
Bonjour, merci beaucoup pour votre emission, j'ai eu beaucoup de plaisir.
Bon courage pour votre chaîne...
Russian speaking French? 你好！
@@doc0core
C'est normal pour ma famille...
@@doc0core I think you mean French speaking Russian
@@wuhui ok you are right too, i was using the simple "subject verb noun" grammar 😆 (omitting the verb to be)
Ohh this is a video that is long time coming. I have been waiting for something like this.
In a total war and let's hope it never comes to that, it's not just your current assets that matter, it is also your entire industrial capacity and your existing infrastructure on whether they can replenish losses and consumables, and repair damaged assets quickly. Understanding a country's military capability must include understanding its industrial war material capacity. Thanks for making this video.
Now I'm gonna watch it.
Haha... I need a cheat sheet for all the ship types.
24:27 interesting to see the size difference between the Type 054A FFG (440' long/4,000+ tons) and the Type 056A FSG (300' long/1,500+ tons).
The difference in size is more than I expected.
Yet another outstandingly researched & high qual vid. The mention of the fusion of the burgenong civil ship-building industry with the naval is valuable and bearing in mind c's accomplishments and ambitions in civil shipbuilding, the overall economies in scale and their synergy are impressive.. I had assummed the Hudong-Zhonghua complex was the biggest naval shipyard given the investment/expansion over the years but interesting to hear it is the dalian yshipyard (& their multiple buildling of the Type 55) Not sure any other site has carried this level and quality of analysis on this topic. All lean meat, no flab. Nice1
*As of 2021, China has over 3000+ shipbuilding yards,*
-- 529 shipyards are capable of building ship of 10,000+ tons above
-- 56 capable of building 100,000+ tons above ships (the average size of US AIRCRAFT carriers is about 100,000 tons)
--30 capable of building 300,000+ tons above ships (almost TRIPLE the size of US AIRCRAFT carriers!)
-And 6 Super shipyards capable of building half a million tons vessels(!!) (almost FIVE times the size of US Aircraft carrier)
All can produce warships in a week.
Every year China builds thousands of various kinds of new ships.
China ship building industry produces over half of the entire world ship production by tonnage.
Wait what? 3000 shipyards? You for real?
@@cabasadefogo9533 The total tonnage of ships built by the United States in 2022 is 600000 tons.
In 2022, the total tonnage of Chinese-built ships is close to 40 million tons.
But 2022 is not the year with the largest shipbuilding volume in China, with 76.65 million tons in 2011.
During World War II, the total tonnage of ships built in the United States was nearly 14 million tons.
@@cabasadefogo9533 At least 3,000. Those numbers are old, precovid.
@@leapdrive 小丑🤡
@@leapdrive cannot be more sour
Love your videos ❤
I wish we didn’t have to have so many weapons.
However, we have tried ‘rich but weak’, it didn’t end too good for us.
we have wealth, so we need weapons to portect it.
You can't have prosperity without security.
It would be important to go over civilian shipyards a bit as well, since they are the true monster of Chinese shipbuilding industry. Waigaowiao shipyard for example, is nearly twice the size of Jiangnan and ship they can build complex vessels like modern cruise ships and LNG ships, they would have no problem producing naval ships should they get the contracts for it.
Though at the end of day, china naval build up is not really limited by shipbuilding cpacity, but by subsystems and personale due a lack of mobilization, which for the sake of world peace is a good thing.
Sinking the US fleet is the right way to maintain world peace
“达利安造船厂” lol
LOL🤣
HAHAHAHA
If all shipyards were to stop commercial production, China has the capability to immediately churn out new naval vessels within weeks and larger naval vessels within month. These days vessels are all built in modular style.
I think this capability are very underestimate by western analysis. That why i think in case a war between US, china will win in long run because they have very huge industrial capacity
according to the chinese military expert,these factory only running on 15 -30 % workload, incase there is a war they can switch to full work of 100% and 200% 24/7
@@我是我-y7k 战争打的的国力，也是工业能力，中国可是有好几亿产业工人，不说这几亿产业工人都来造武器，单几个车企全负荷运行造武器那数量都惊人
I'd rather not pick fights with an industrial power.
@@Fauzanarief-n7i China imports 70% of it's iron ore from Australia. Australia is one of Americas biggest allies. In times of war, China imports will be completely cut off by blockade so whatever domestic iron ore will be diverted to ammunition, not naval asset or land and air asset. If the Chinese could import from Russia or anywhere else, they would of already. China loses the long run by a mile.
Well done China Super Shipyard to building more advanced powerful Navy vessels in the world.❤❤💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯❤❤
These are just the ones out in the open for all to see.
Congratulations. good video.
Love this background music,
Me too!!
Im impressed by how the chinese military industry changed a lot
They slowly and surely got their shitt together post-Mao. They were third-world poor at a time!
Stronger china makes me feel happy.
Check out the story about a 094A SSBN surfacing in the Philippines Sea during Shandong fleet exercise near Guam.
Interesting !!! Much of CHINA submarine and tech are NOT knwn to the West . My guess is U S knows that it has LACK behind to CH INA subm arine abilities since 2015. Believe that new Su bmar ines can CARRY Hy perso nic Miss les. 🤯🤯
No don't! This will break their protective bubble that the US is #1 and they'll freak out.
Can you do it also for US and Russia naval shipyards as comparison?
核心问题不在于造船厂，工业配套系统的整体，现在的造船厂只是一个整体调试的地方………
模块化中的配重调试都是在陆地生产线完成的…已经不是10年前了
no comparison needed, its not on same level, china shipyards are world largest and most advanced ship yard, , while the gap is too big for US and russia, like 100 years behind
@@xinyiquan666 Not true! While China has some big big shipyards so does the US. And it is pretty clear that China is not making neither the largest nor the most advanced ships in the world. They are making lots of ships tho. And yet the amount of ships in tonnage compared to Korea is about the same. So in terms of the bigger ships SK is making more bigger ships than China.
@@napobg6842
Actually the biggest ship was built in Japan in the 1970s. So I'm not sure where you're going with that line of reasoning 😂😂
@@napobg6842 the fact that a single Chinese shipyard can produce the entire US shipbuilding industry says everything.
So what do you reckon they are capable of all at once. At least 5 destroys and 5 frigates plus 2 carriers and many submarine all able to be simultaneously produced?
too easy
yes,you said right
PLA launched 43 warships of various classes in 2022. Wartime capacity would likely be higher than that.
Dalian Shipyard had 5 destroyers under construction at the same time, it's already proved.
@@bearpolo3618only in one dockyard😂
Because recent escalations of the clash of empires and NATO sponsored/directed military actions inside the former USSR, China will be ramping up both military production capacity and military production rates. This means any estimates of current production rates will be accelerated with multiple shifts and increased feeder subsystems & subassembly facilities.
Also when Xi recently spoke concerns for new college graduate employment, I expect R & D efforts to ramp up. This means many more variants to quickly be prototyped for both ships and subsystems, plus developing new military technologies.
Mother fucker. The Chinese aren’t stupid enough to buy into Russian propaganda. The last thing NATO wanted was to provoke Russia into doing something stupid. If NATO’s plan was to get Russia to invade Ukraine, why didn’t they have contingencies in place for losing access to Russian gas? Why did they have to search far and wide for Soviet equipment that the Ukrainians had the infrastructure to use while they worked to get them in a situation where they could use donated NATO stock? Why didn’t they just train them on that in the first place? How was UA on the verge of joining NATO when NATO doesn’t allow countries w/ territorial disputes to even apply for membership? If preventing the possibility of UA joining NATO was the goal, they achieved it…in 2014. And don’t tell me NATO’s Freshest, Finland is somehow less of a threat than a hypothetical NATO w/ UA.
China didn’t want this war anymore than NATO. Russia was supposed to provide a massive resource bank for China to point to and draw upon in the event of war. But now, because of Putin’s catastrophically dumb ass, it’s an open question on whether there will even be a Russian state on which China can rely.
Supply Chains, infrastructures, 5G,AI,manpowers, no other countries around the world can challenge Chinese ship buildings
Korea has all those things and can just import more migrant workers
man please they will be at the bottom of the ocean in days
So, where does the energy come from?... I mean, it's not like blackouts happen, especially in the winter.. so it must be so great it can deliver the energy and food needs, right? But I don't think many countries want to compare. And, I also heard about the scam China did with 5g. Pretty much downgrading 4g and presenting 4g as 5g. Had the same speeds posted by netizens. Idk if they improved it now, but if they did, primarily in wealthy areas, but definitely not every part of China.
Haha okay wu mao....😅😅😅😅
You already forgot those war factory from u.s and europe... 😂😂😂 Far more advance naval shipyard hahaha korean and japanese can match that too... Lol...😊
We must take note of our great technological gap in shipbuilding technology compared to the great united states of america. Their Dellan shipyard are building 2 DDG-55 class cruisers and 5 DDG-52 class destroyers at the same time, while the Southdelta shipyard is building CVN-3 super carrier. We can only build trash can littoral fishing boats that were already retired not even after 10 years of service. Respect!
Are praising or dissing China's capabilities?
Littoral got retired before even enter services or combat ready. But worry not, China don't have modern combat experiences (from common American clown )
@@peekaboopeekaboo1165 read my comment again carefully
@@rogue_hk 只服役十年😂😂😂是个在国内生活的人都有常识讲不出这种无知的话。
@@露透社 战忽局在上班，别妨碍工作
The biggest *DISADVANTAGE* that the US Navy has is *TONNAGE* .The new Chinese warships are all designed to be slim and light, travelling further and carrying more payloads whilst reducing fuel consumption. The US Warships are aged, rust buckets, antiquated and they are much heavier making them much less fuel efficient. We wouldn't use "tonnage" as a metric when it comes to measuring the state of military personnel, since a large tonnage would be a sign of poor health and obesity, how anyone can apply that metric to the US Navy and call it an advantage is beyond logic!
It can take more hits
@@richarddavis8394 the point of the modern navy is to have stealth and high tech radar detection to prevent being hit to begin with, which is why they are lighter to travel faster
the only ship in the US navy that has this 'overweight' problem is the LCS and Zumwalts which are woefully undergunned for their weight. but the other surface combatants are still decently well armed.
Your video is great, may I ask you, has the Chinese ship engine been solved?
Leading
their starting point was high - starting with Ukraine's engines tech, and improve from there. They should easily be in a leading position now after 30 years of digestion.
Their conventional steam turbine engine/gas turbine engine is first tier, might not be the best but not far from it. As for nuclear power, it’s still unclear. Nuclear submarines are too secretive to tell, China hasn’t built any surface nuclear power warships.
china build 60%-70% if the world ship so I am sure engine is not the problem, your mindset is stuck in the 80s
Congratulations to the Chinese, you have a right to self determination, and defense. Peace and Love from the African continent.
I expect China to lead the world in incorporating lessons learned into future systems being procured. Especially drones of all sizes and purposes, drone swarms, long range low cost precision munitions (e.g. larger bore longer barrel artillery with steerable shells), plus defensive measures against the new offensive capability (decoys, camoflauge, active close in defense, etc). I also expect a general shift towards undersea boats/ships (surface ships are too vulnerable to detection and attack).
Children make choices
We all need it
got to learn a lot, thanks. You should make a discord server
Jiangnan shipyard was moved for the Shanghai Expo.
They moved an entire shipyard for an expo?
@@gelinrefira The power of communism, comrade.
@@kevinmckay1389 I know you meant it as a joke, but China can move literal mountains if doing so will better the lives of its people.
So yea...
@@gelinrefira Relocate to accommodate a larger shipyard, otherwise there won't be enough factory space. Jiangnan Shipyard was established over a hundred years ago, and its location in Shanghai is equivalent to Manhattan Island in New York City.
@@gelinrefira the short answer is no, the long answer is that the shipyard was in the center of the city, there was already plan to move it out completely.
The Yangzi doesn't divide China in half. The US and USSR wanted Jiang to hold on across the Yangzi, and he ran away. The Huai and Qin divides China.
I imagine China producing low cost subs designed to provide survivable capability of DF-27 missiles that operate very close to Chinese shore, where they are well protected from detection and attack. Such subs would surface to launch (their missiles are thus identical to land based missiles). Low cost Subs not requiring high speed, no long duration missions, only shallow depth operation, and reliant of regional protection instead of on board systems. I expect coastal control of all undersea activity would be watertight out to 50 miles from shore.
im not sure if DF27s could even be mounted on subs let alone diesel subs which are much smaller.
Hi, my names Doug and I’ve never heard of dimensions. Furthermore, I like to run my mouth about things I clearly haven’t tried to understand. I see missiles on trucks and boldly ask why those trucks not underwater trucks. I have big brain. Doctors call it “swollen” and complement me about my “hemorrhage.” They so jealous of my brain size. Everyday they urge me to come see them at their hospital. I tell them they are slackers and if they want to see me so bad why don’t they do it after work?
What if we defended the South China Sea using sharks, with freaking laser beams on their heads?
@@hughmungus2760 small sub goes vertical and sticks it’s nose out of the water to launch. No need for large diameter sub
@@williambrasky3891 mobile launch trucks are a survivability feature. Undersea launch platforms take survivability to the next level. Regarding South China Sea and other bases far from the mainland, survivability of mobile launch trucks on a small island is dubious
@@douginorlando6260 Im sure the crew would love that.
But in all seriousness if china were to put hypersonic glide weapons on a sub, they would convert an SSBN to fire them. those have silos big enough to fit.
How are the working conditions like in this shipyards? How are wages vs US shipyards?
Let’s not get into that lol
Jokes on you, US doesn’t have commercials shipyards anymore. They are all gone, China and South Korea ship builder sent their US counter part into the grave.
$US1500-2000 a month for a typical craft. accommodation and lunch is generally provided, they typically work 13 day fortnights, 10hr shifts. PPP its better than working in a US shipyard lol. Staff gets paid a little higher, they would have own accommodation nearby. The usual public holidays and shutdown for Chinese new year, and double bubble for public holidays. Insurance, 401k equivalent etc are all on top of the pay. It isn't bad cause they are in demand and labor mobility between yards is quite common. They are ahead not cause of cheap labor, but continuity of work on top of the work ethics that allows for continuous improvement and productivity gains. Comparing the productivity between the countries and its no contest....
Also, dollar for dollar, its sooo much cheaper in China as cost of living is sooo much lower.
@@Praetorian157A actually not really. Shanghai and Guangzhou are really, really expensive places.. the dorms and cheap food is a draw card to balance the costs. The wages gotta keep up with living expenses in the area.. people go where the $$$ is.
Control over the fundamental forces of production is everything. This is most represented by the military-industrial complex, which is the "first-derivative" of a nation's macroeconomy. Ostensibly under direct control of the State and her entire resources/labor productivity.
The shipbuilding industry is a key indicator of well the State can wield these fundamental forces. China's shipyards is but one facet of the scale of manufacturing and coordination throughout the economy. In a larger sense, China's development is because the CPC is able to organize labor and balance interests at the State level. That is to say the CPC becomes the supra-union for all labor interests.
While China's development model uses profits as an indicator of competitiveness, it's state owned companies are not beholden to them, and instead pursue scale and labor productivity as the benchmark. This video x1000 can be applied to all sectors of China's economy: nuclear power, solar, hydroelectric, power transmission, ports, high-speed rail, civil engineering (HMZB anyone?), etc, etc.
The chinese shipbuilding capacity is equal to the total of the rest world, and the cost of a chinese navy vessel is about 1/3 of a same level US one. When US Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro ensured on CNN that all chinese most sophisticated navy ships are built by "slaves", I knew that US navy would not have any chance to encounter the raise of its chinese rival.😂😂😂
Cnn is correct, china large ship builder are build with slave- I do believe they dont paid robot cutter and welder any wage only feed them with electric
🤣🤣🤣🤣dont we all love CNN logic
Hey you put some respec on that slave labor. They died so those ships could ship your cheap Chinese knockoff products.
Shut up. China bot
He secretly wished the USN shipyards had slaves to build them too!
L actually agree with you and finally some one who l found in the comment section that actually has a functioning brain for once @@KishorTwist
they should build more type 055 to about 30. then develop new version even more potent
30 is a lot.
@@gelinrefira but can replace older designs
30 is unnecessary and the money can be put into more strategic projects instead.
They are already planning type 057 destroyers.
@@gelinrefira It needs more destroyers to match the US arleigh burke, I don't feel comfortable with just type 52dls
Dalian shipyard can build 5 warships at once, and complete them within a year … this is the level of industrial power the US used to have.
just 5 per year? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@jetli740一个船厂的能力，这样的船厂，中国有3000个以上😅
@@太宗唐-s7v低調😅
@@太宗唐-s7v I know, I 🤣🤣 at Dalian shipyard
you mean DA LI AN
I'm Chinese.
Don't be scared
All boats are fishing boats or rescue boats
For example, evacuation of overseas Chinese
Yea I’m pretty sure fishing boats don’t have Guns or missiles.
@@tetraxis3011they are for sharks
@@kanestalin7246 Yea fishing boats are for sharks. These are not.
I saw a report that China is providing a 100,000 tonne dry dock for Russia. This will be the largest in Russia according to the report.
Russia does not have the ability to manufacture warships, Russia since the day of founding haven't bulid any medium or large warships, all their warships are the legacy of the Soviet Union
This is a crucial video on Chinese naval modernization, albeit a mere introduction, outlining public sources.
If I were the Chinese, I would utilize the large, mountaineous island of Hainan not just as a naval station for the Southern Fleet, but also as a forward shipyard to construct, maintain and launch submarines, covertly from international spectators.
I can't tell if that is technically feasible - hauling the necessary material from the mainland under *a strategem* of modernizing Hainan - but the historical analogy would be *the German military campaign into Norway in 1940 ('Operation Weser Exercise') with the sole objective to spread German submarines from being trailed by British destroyers after leaving German harbours* , forcing the Royal Navy to disperse in consequence...
Hainan Island is meant to be Miami of US with Aerospace industry + Hong Kong style financial district and free trade zone in the future, I think.
@@directxxxx71
"Hainan Island is meant to be Miami of US with Aerospace industry (...)"
That may well be so.
I - admittingly - _speculated_ about a plausible dual use that will remain classified.
Building carriers are extremely complex. China is the only nation outside US that can build one independently. The arresting cables to stop jets on deck are too complex, and only US & China can build that system. Besides those big specialty drydock, specialty steels, machine tools are difficult to make.
France can also make such ships.
@@napobg6842 Did you mean *INDEPENDENTLY* ?
@@Chickenworm9394 Yup
@@napobg6842 you really know nothing about Tech and France. plz just read more books
@@zhaomax5857 I know nothing? France literally has a nuclear carrier with catapults system 🤣🤣🤣
Three things-
1-can you do a vid on if Japan can survive a war against China?
2-And even with all this,the west and Japan will still underestimate China and think they can beat China in like seven hours(the U.S especially)
3-Can the U.S really beat China easily?
Any war with China will be the end of humanity.
Seriously....
That answer was given long ago in the Korean Peninsula. The US + the entire UN forces, fought China for 3 years, under the weapons parity of 1:10 in favor of the UN forces, barely fought China to a standstill. And today the weapons parity is likely at 1:2, and 2:1 for some areas, while China has moved from zero defense industry in the 1950s, to probably the largest defense compound in the world today. Your question is pretty much moot.
And trust me, if the US can defeat China in 7 hours, this would have been done in the 1990s before China's takeoff to become what it is today. The Judeo-Anglo think tanks will constantly measure their military options in defense of their economic interest.
I don’t know where you get that 7 hours thing but it’s truly stupid. US fought 7+ years in southern Vietnam for one reason; to contain China and communism.
If US could finish China off in couple hours why bother with Vietnam?
1 Japanese in its current state wouldn’t survive a war with China. It’s trade routes almost entirely under Chinese control. Japanese home islands are too small; population, industry and infrastructure are concentrated in a few major cities. Destroying those infrastructure would not be difficult, blockade is also not difficult. If both happens, Japanese will starve to death.
3. the question you need to ask is can USA really beats China. Has China already grown to a point, it’s no longer possible to defeat China without wiping out human civilization (aka nuclear annihilation) along with it. I think the answer is yes. What you are fighting here is World second largest economy, second largest country by population and largest industrial capacity on earth. Maybe get use to the fact USA won’t be the only superpower in the game.
they need to build more shipyard
Can you cover the Japanese MSDF shipbuilding and its history aswell, Always been fascinated by that
It would honestly be fascinating to see how the entire european continents shipbuilding ability compares to chinat
Not comparable. China,Korea & Japan together make up 90% of global shipbuilding capacities.
China has over 3000 ship docks so much more than Europe
The shipbuidling industry in China is probably their most impressive indusrty. Currently in scale it is only rivaled by SK. China is probably the nation with the second largest potential to built ships behind the US. The US coasts are simply give more potential to make ships. That's why the US has so many major ports and terminals. The US is also the nation with the biggest amount of shipyards in the world tho they are much smaller than the Chinese. But the Chinese shipbuilding industry is incredible! America have started investing more into their military shipbuilding capabilities. Something that had to start long long time ago. The removing of the subsidies for the US shipbuilding industry was one of the greatest blunders of their history IMO. Countries like China, Japan and SK replaced them and not China is capable of outproducing the US even in the militaary side of things. It will take many many years before America can outproduce China again. But the potential is there.
Chinese shipyard have been outproducing the US for years now
Just as Bismarck said - the US has weak neighbours to the north and south, and fishes to the east and west.. a truly imbalanced advantage
LMAO no. A country like SK with a tiny coastline has one of the largest shipbuilding industries in the world. Technology, investment, and consistent government support are the determinants of shipbuilding prowess, not coastline length. The only "potential" there for the US is national disintegration.
ShipBuilding in USA is DEAD, what tf ya talking about?. There's no big commercial shipbuilding in US..
@@sergiocazzaro4571 True! US needs to return to investments in the industry. As of now they are more focused on restoring the naval capacity.
利澳宁州的达利安船厂，😊
The Largest US ships Production output is on 1940-1945, Where US Build total 7,601 Ship per year, Thats 1,520 Ship per year in All Vessel from Naval,Oil Tanker and Merchant Vessel and it was peaked of US Industry because at that time its grueling by War...
On the other hand,
China Build 1,500 Ship Per year average from 2012 Only for Commercial and have straight 10 years build 1,500 Ship and also on modern time is fastest naval building ship in peacetime,
And the difference, US do that because peak WW2 while China is just commercial, Meaning if China turn to Mobilizing Economy War, Its will be gargantuan.. Add enough, China start building Ship on A.I and Lesser Labour needed
WHAT?!! Todays TH-cam comments filled with Dozens of chat Bot, Oh my God!
Also my opinion is China always had perfect planning on everything
yeah, their zero covid strategy was one mighty success!
@@Kevin-fq3zh 🤣🤣🤣🤣
why china make perfect plan, well they employer the right person for the job, Usa employed who the best boot licker for the job
@@Kevin-fq3zh like millions seniors died like the us😂
@@alinux09 and you assume China got off lightly? lolol… their crematoria are fully booked for the next 3 months and they have stopped counting covid deaths 🤣🤣🤣
Thank you very much for the informative programme. I appreciate your attempts to pronounce the Chinese names of various entities correctly. However, I hope that you can do away with some Chinese names being pronounced in their western, romanised manner. Pronouncing Chinese names correctly can help avoid wrongly associating places with names.
Thank you.
他是台湾人啊
Let me drop and American proverb:
Tomato tomato
@@williambrasky3891 Potato potato
Its all for show. China's navy does not have a network of foreign bases to be effective overseas operations. But in littoral waters China can certainly deliver a LOT of firepower against foreign historically agressive powers. Dalian was was occupied by foreign powers in the historical past - NEVER AGAIN.
НОАК.🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳💪💪💪💪💪
In the early days, most Chinese shipyards produced an inferior vessels unless strict quality and super visionary controls were put into place. I have been on many vessels built in Chinese yards which were very poorly completed. with in many cases having the delivery crews correcting the shipyard mistakes. These shipyards can do very good work but they must be supervised. What Western clients tend to do is place a supervisory staff who have final say on how everything is done. Including making major structural changes if required. Also in the early 90's we had two naval architects FROM DALIAN SHIPYARD do time at the Australian Maritime College's ship research laboratory running amongst others the towing tank where hull resistance and underwater characteristics were measured. This place was also instrumental in developing the winged keel for the America's cup win for AUSTRALIA II .
Now days the Chinese shipyards are certified in ISO in the same way as western shipyards are certified, guaranteeing the quality.
大哥，你这英语好像哪里不对😂😂😂
You have made the "战略忽悠局” ’s job very difficult
Compro a fragata toda por 500 trilhões manda para a base do rio de janeiro Niterói brasil marinha
China is catching up in maritime technology
...
This many shipyards can make a floating island double the size of Taiwan. Then why considering to push the world into war over Taiwan.
台湾是中国的一部分。林肯总统为什么要攻击美国南方呢？
SSN are the weakest point of pla navy
Lol type 95 being built in hudingzonegship yard lol since November 2022 enters service in 2027 to 2032 6 month so far beging bulit
Diesel-Electric AIP Subs works better for the PLAN since the sea surrounding China and Taiwan Strait are shallow.
Hence why they're the navy with the most Diesel-Electric AIP Subs in the world right now.
@@melwyn789 exactly any American sub entering the Taiwan strait is literally committing suicide. They are way too large to hide in such shallow waters. I would not be surprised if half of them actually just destroy themselves trying to maneuver and crashing into a sea mount
that's true
Imma waiting for USA to sanction Chinese SHIPYARD, as its dual engineering expertise is a DANGER to US National intrest...
Ohh, plsssss.. sanction these yard... LoL
Go ahead who cares.
well,. US has no measures to sanction, US has no much mordern ship building technology, china is like 100 years more advanced,
@@xinyiquan666 差异在于美国的军工复合体，需要的是利润！
美国设计的标准是，外观足够惊艳美观，维护周期内要有足够的利润
在这个设计的大纲下，完成功能设计…
中国军工不一样的设计思路
would be amazing if Usa sanction china ship yard, many of their commercial ship are build there.
Compro a fragata toda por 900bilhoes manda para a base do rio de janeiro Niterói brasil marinha
These facilities will likely be targeted if Americans decide to intervene in Taiwan or SCS (They might merge into a single Pacific war). The Americans didn't purchase 12000 JASSM's just to put them in storage. China needs to have proper air defenses set up in vital military and research installations. Perhaps more importantly, it needs to develop the ability to retaliate against American facilities as well. Conflicts are more likely when one side think they cannot be touched.
Na, nobody would attack those shipyards. Just like nobody is daring to hit Russian ammo factories or tank factories. We all know where they are but nobody would risk an escalation with a nuclear power. You retards better keep that in mind. China also has hundreds of ballistic missiles able to hit US shipyards. Would you risk you and your family being blown up into pieces? You might not care cause you are retarded but the smarter politician and businessman wouldn’t want that.
target by who? if us target them, then china wiill target Usa infrasture, they have hypersonic miissile for that
now question is would Usa dare to target these? and pull it in full blown war
Good luck trying to get the plane into JASSM firing range with DF series missiles raining down hell into your carriers or air bases though.
The US still doesn't have countermeasures against Hypersonics which China have plenty of.
@@melwyn789 The new JASSM-EX has a range of 1900km, Americans can launch their bombers from Hawaii or even continental US with air refuelling. This is a real and present threat, not something to be dismissed. Also, you will need continuous missile strikes to keep US bases suppressed, otherwise they can be operational again shortly after repairs.
@@ld871111 China can also lunch attack to Hawaii... what are you talking about?
Move our industrial capacity to China. What's the worst that can happen?
Same as China sharing early inventions worth Europe... It didn't age well
Yes China to the moon 🌛🫶❤️
With the rapid modernization of Chinese Military, Taiwan should also enhance its coastal defense force by acquiring/building large numbers of coastal submarines(120-500 tons displacement), shored based anti-ship missile batteries, fast missile boats, fast mine layer ships, drones (surveillance, combat, and kamikaze), mobile artilleries, ATGMs, and layered ground air defense systems. These platforms will compliment each other in order to form a defensive solid stance. I bet no admiral in any nation's navy will dare to conduct amphibious operation of Taiwan. And if China will approach blockade, I think it would be better for the government of Taiwan to let their citizen store some basic necessities such as food and water for a duration of 1-2 years.
Truth is China don't even need this navy for Taiwan if you want to talk crazy in this way. Taiwan is such a short distance away that with the industrial capacity of China they can just pump out and rain cheap missiles across the entirety of Taiwan 24/7 for ages until it's just a burned up lump of charcoal. But that's not China's goal. They want reunification and not scorched earth.
A VAST majority of Taiwanese want the USA to leave them alone...or else....
With bloom sticks?
How many kilometers do you think a 120-500-ton submarine can go out of port to fight independently? During the Taiwan Strait war, there will be early warning aircraft in the sky, dozens of destroyers at sea, and nuclear-powered attack submarines in the sea. These pocket submarines are not as useful as mine tubes.
idiot
Shyna 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳 sheap quality 😂😂😂
If your watcher are English-Speaking people, then improve the speaker's English is more important.
His English is fine
Impressive, at least youve given the Taiwanese, Japanese, the Americans and South Koreans proximity specific targets to geolocate their missiles and aircraft AGM mission sorties in the event of a Chinese war with QUAD, AUKUS, South Korea, Japan and other anti Chinese neighbours. 🤣
Well, the location of these facilities is no secret to begin with, and neither is what they build. The most I did is to draw attention to them for people that don't know.
@@EurasiaNaval Of course, your OSINT is very educational for my personal education on Chinese capabilities and giving a more informed level of respect as a Samoan Australian and as a Pacific Islander in awe of American and the nascency of the Chinese Blue Water fleet which I, as a Samoan, do not feel intimidated with the Chinese Multipolarity new world order headed by BRICS and the SCO, which may also ask for a Blue Water port from a South Pacific Island State, like Samoa. I would regard that multupolarity is economically beneficial for the world we live and to proffer a more balanced world not bullied by Eurocentrism and American Hegemonic bullying via their purported impartial rule of law. It is very partial to the former Colonial and Imperial powers. I personally have an aversion for Colonialism although I am thankful for the legacy of Colonialism for globalisation, interactivity, mutual trade, cultural exchange, and shared wealth. Multipolarity world order will place a check and balance upon a lethargic and lopsided world order with privileged more developed economies primarily from Europe and North America dominating the rule of law parameters undermining the less equal, struggling and emerging economies such as the fledgling Pacific Island Nations, Caribbean, African continent, Asia, Gulf States, and Central and South American States. Each developing Nations endeavours to improve their lot as best they can. China has offered their carrot on a sticj Belt and Road Initiative, and although there are strings attached, the Chinese have given many developing fragile economies a little boast and a hand up in improving their domestic infrastructures and domestic governance. Samoans, as well as other Pacific Islands have gain a lot from the Chinese. In return, the Chinese need friends, albeit, very few of them. Taiwan also has a need for friends but, since China has actually proposed a speed rail link under the Taiwan Strait, you can see how they have envisioned the One China Policy to include the former KMT Nationalists back into the fold since 1949. The One China Policy sees China and Taiwan in a much bigger ambitious perspective that will enhance China in their global posture as a super power. Korea too has lacked this vision unlike Vietnam which had dismissed the ideological division of the Macarthy Domina theory and has realised that National unity and identity was more important than ideodolical dogma. But, back to the rapid Chinese military build up which is also in par with the Chinese cvivilian and commercial infrastructural development along a Macroeconomic Keynesian think big vision by the Chinese Government that also includes global developments in other countries, which scares the shit out of Americans and Europeans. This is very good for the rest of us and that multipolarity seems like a very good alternative to American Hegemony especailly in light of the response to the Ukrainian crisis by putting out the fire by throwing fuel into the conflict by the weapons industry complex in America. In saying that, the Chinese are scaring the Americans every single day as more and more new weapons and warships roll out of the shipyards, more Satellites are laucnhed into space, more cars are rolled out of the factories, more megastructures are completed, more bridges, new skyscrapers are built and new cities are appearing in the middle of a desert, or new islands appearing from the depths of the vast empty oceans, you can only sit back and be amazed with how the Chinese thinks.
No one in East Asia is anti-China. Not even Japan and SK and certainly not SE Asia. No one wants to see war breaking out and everyone knows it is the US provoking conflict in this region. The more US tries to provoke a war here, the more desperate they really are. China doesn't want to dominate the world or any colonial imperialist bullshit you are projecting, they just want to be left alone to do their thing and trade but if you think China is gonna just meekly accept being bullied around, you are going to be in a nasty surprise.
Kindly fuck off with your warmongering.
@@TimBrianTufuga Hey, thanks for the taking the time to respond like that. I read your entire reply. I enjoyed hearing about your background as a Samoan. I thought you are from the Pacific Islands, but not sure which country that is - now I know!
i pretty much doubt that US or its allies will target mainland china, just like US restric Ukraine to targeting deep inside russia
Love the propaganda.
So the actual reality is that China has none of these things? That's a huge copium from the Amerifats
现代造船是在陆地上建好模块后直接在船坞内进行拼接组装 建造速度飞快 当你的工业规模和技术指标已经达到足够高的水平后 你就能看到中国在以造货轮的速度造055和052D 美国经过长期的去工业化 已经丧失了在军备竞赛中获胜的可能
Hell China through up massive skyscrapers in half the time aswell but by god if chinas skyscrapers are anything to go on then chinas naval forces are in serious trouble as basically China is shine over shit, I’ve been hearing about problems with every Chinese weapons systems from tanks to missiles to helicopters jet fighters and apcs made from none bullet resistant armour and the ships will be no different, these fleets of Chinese warships are paper warriors, nothing works on them and even worse chinese personnel to operate the ships are a possible even worse concern as they have no trained techies to run the ships and keep them fighting, all window show just as everything else in China
Compro a fragata toda por 900bilhoes manda para a base do rio de janeiro Niterói brasil marinha