Thank you for excellent videos with great information on flying and on different plane platforms. I appreciate you and especially for sharing your expertise and experiences. You are a top level pilot and it shows on your landings and takeoffs from very difficult places and in all levels of wind and weather conditions. Your energy and speed management through constant adjustment is just amazing to watch. I have learned a lot from you in your videos. I cannot thank you enough for sharing your knowledge and experience. Thanks again.
What year is your 182? I have a 1972 182P. Our paint jobs are almost identical. I enjoy your videos a lot. Your are one of my favorite pilots on TH-cam. Great aviator !
Thanks for the excellent thoughts and opinions, I very much enjoyed hearing your perspectives, it inspired me to reflect on what My impressions were the best flying Cessna's and the Cessna's that were the most fun to fly, because the best flying Cessna's are perhaps not always the most fun. My father was a Cessna, Mooney and Beach dealer, and I've had the opportunity to own and fly just about every model of Cessna and Beech single and twin, and the Cessna 172 series I consider to be the best flying Cessna models, with the Skyhawk XP being my favorite because of the smooth six cylinder engine with fuel Injection, and having a better power to weight and drag ratio than a 182 in some conditions. My personal favorite Cessna (which I've mentioned in another one of your videos) is the 1965 and 66 Cessna 210s with the 66' T-210F, the last of the strutted 210s, basically a turbo 206RG with a lower drag wing leading edge, some flesh riveting and drag cleanups, it also has a couple of feet more flap due to Cessna's use of Frise type ailerons that greatly improve the role and the characteristics. It's basically a 200+ MPH 206 that's more fuel-efficient than a 182 or 172 per mile. I've also flown and owned a number of 300 and 400 sires Cessnas, and and I preferred the early, lighter weight 310's like the 1959 to 1962 models, but my personal favorite out of all the Cessna 300 series was the 1962 to 1963 turbo 320 Skyknights, with the turbocharged TISO-470 engines (turbocharged fuel injected 182 engines), over the later, heavier 320s that had the TISO-520s I've flown the 470 and 520 versions side by side on a delivery flight, and had to throttle back on the 470 version to keep from running away from the 520 powered version, while burning about 20 to 30% less fuel. With the lighter engines it flew nicer, landed and took off slower and overall was a better flying aircraft. As for being fun to fly, I give the B55 the Edge. Out of the 400 series Cessna twins, I like the early 402 models, and preferred the 421 over the 414, the Cessna 421 is one of my favorite aircraft, near turboprop performance for a fraction of the cost, comfortable, stable and overall a great long distance cruiser, easier to fly than 310 to boot, but not as nimble. The Cessna 340 is a nice aircraft but rub piston pressurized twin, my two favorites are 58P Baron that has more range than a 340, two doors and will fit in a lot of hangers at 340 won't go into, And for pressurized twins, my personal favorite is the Aerostar.
What an awesome landing! It impresses me how consistently you can pull that off. You must have 100s of thousands of landings!
Great breakdown! I have a few hours on a -170 and I was surprised how much nicer it flies than most -172s
Great information. Thank you for the breakdown between the different models
Yeah I really enjoy watching thanks 👍
Thank you for excellent videos with great information on flying and on different plane platforms. I appreciate you and especially for sharing your expertise and experiences. You are a top level pilot and it shows on your landings and takeoffs from very difficult places and in all levels of wind and weather conditions. Your energy and speed management through constant adjustment is just amazing to watch. I have learned a lot from you in your videos. I cannot thank you enough for sharing your knowledge and experience. Thanks again.
Very nice view 👍👍👍
Thanks!
Thank you
@@motoadveBackcountry182 you're welcome. Hope to see some new content soon. Miss seeing your videos. Bendiciones!
What year is your 182? I have a 1972 182P. Our paint jobs are almost identical. I enjoy your videos a lot. Your are one of my favorite pilots on TH-cam. Great aviator !
Thanks, I am glad you enjoy my videos, mine is a P model year 1973
@@motoadveBackcountry182 👍
Hi. Always enjoy your videos. However, at 5:24, you say the 310 is the only twin from Cessna. Did you forget about the Cessna Skymaster?
What I was saying its the only twin I have flown from Cessna, I know there is the 313, 337 410 414 etc.
@@motoadveBackcountry182 Gotcha!
Thanks for the excellent thoughts and opinions, I very much enjoyed hearing your perspectives, it inspired me to reflect on what My impressions were the best flying Cessna's and the Cessna's that were the most fun to fly, because the best flying Cessna's are perhaps not always the most fun. My father was a Cessna, Mooney and Beach dealer, and I've had the opportunity to own and fly just about every model of Cessna and Beech single and twin, and the Cessna 172 series I consider to be the best flying Cessna models, with the Skyhawk XP being my favorite because of the smooth six cylinder engine with fuel Injection, and having a better power to weight and drag ratio than a 182 in some conditions.
My personal favorite Cessna (which I've mentioned in another one of your videos) is the 1965 and 66 Cessna 210s with the 66' T-210F, the last of the strutted 210s, basically a turbo 206RG with a lower drag wing leading edge, some flesh riveting and drag cleanups, it also has a couple of feet more flap due to Cessna's use of Frise type ailerons that greatly improve the role and the characteristics. It's basically a 200+ MPH 206 that's more fuel-efficient than a 182 or 172 per mile.
I've also flown and owned a number of 300 and 400 sires Cessnas, and and I preferred the early, lighter weight 310's like the 1959 to 1962 models, but my personal favorite out of all the Cessna 300 series was the 1962 to 1963 turbo 320 Skyknights, with the turbocharged TISO-470 engines (turbocharged fuel injected 182 engines), over the later, heavier 320s that had the TISO-520s I've flown the 470 and 520 versions side by side on a delivery flight, and had to throttle back on the 470 version to keep from running away from the 520 powered version, while burning about 20 to 30% less fuel. With the lighter engines it flew nicer, landed and took off slower and overall was a better flying aircraft. As for being fun to fly, I give the B55 the Edge.
Out of the 400 series Cessna twins, I like the early 402 models, and preferred the 421 over the 414, the Cessna 421 is one of my favorite aircraft, near turboprop performance for a fraction of the cost, comfortable, stable and overall a great long distance cruiser, easier to fly than 310 to boot, but not as nimble. The Cessna 340 is a nice aircraft but rub piston pressurized twin, my two favorites are 58P Baron that has more range than a 340, two doors and will fit in a lot of hangers at 340 won't go into, And for pressurized twins, my personal favorite is the Aerostar.
What is the glass gauge on dash. Aiming point?
Angle of attack indicator by Alpha Systems
I hate you. I have a 182p that I love and now I need a 170b as well. You will be hearing from my wife ;)
LOL