The 2025 Acura MDX Type S Is A Family SUV With An Advanced Blend Of Luxury & Speed
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ค. 2024
- The #AcuraMDX took the role as Acura's flagship model back in 2022 and it introduced the first-ever high performance #AcuraMDXTypeS. As the first #TypeS SUV in the #Acura portfolio, the #MDXTypeS borrows its 3.0L Turbo V6 from the #TLXTypeS and for 2025, Acura has made the #MDX more appealing with slight styling tweaks and an improved touch-screen infotainment system.
We're also on:
Instagram: / redline_reviews
Facebook: / liketheredline
Twitter: / tweettheredline - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
Happy Tuesday everyone! Hope you all had a safe and relaxing holiday weekend! The Acura MDX gets subtle but effective updates for 2025 and while the pre-refreshed model was already one of the best looking vehicles in the segment, Acura made it even more handsome for 2025 and finally added a touch screen! If only they would just add a bit more power to the Type S model!
Please review the new 2024 buick envision. Wanted to see your thoughts before buying.
I will say this again ....I have a 2014 Acura Rlx Sport Hybrid....
377 horsepower 341 Torque...
With pretty much all the features
28 mpg city 32 highway. I always had an Acura..I could get to go 0 to 60 in about 4.6 seconds in a 2014 !!!!!!! Acura is not really listening to their customers. All my friends have gone to BMW and Mercedes!!!!! Now we see why !!!!!!!!
They also still use timing belts on their v6's instead of timing chains like on their i4's... Very unappealing.
Exactly, the new MDX type s is very very underwhelming for a “performance“ variant.
@@kingtrax5759
I didn't know that for the 4 cylinders....
Thanks
Everyday I learn something new. Thanks.
th-cam.com/video/4BwgwNIfjZ8/w-d-xo.html
The obsession for a bigger and bigger screens just blows my mind. One thing I learned for good is that most people are never content in the car industry and always either want more or always comparing so it makes people not appreciate what’s available now. Smh
Seriously!
Ppl think bigger screen = more luxury
For the class, this screen isn’t really that large. All the competitors have large screens that go all the way across.
I see more older MDXs on the road vs new ones. Those old ones are freaking tank's
Agree they all still look good too!
Our 2015 with 110,000 drives like new.
@Nick-tt2rh man those olds ones might not looks as good but damn thing is a beast. Keep it going, and may it reach 200k miles!
Nice upgrade overall, the new touchscreen system is especially nice coming from the touchpad in my 22. But I feel like the price is pretty high, especially for the Type-S. A CPO or used pre facelift Type S seems like an insane value for the money in comaprison.
13:33
"Why so serious? I dont understand" - Alex Pereira 😂😂😂😂
The screen is big enough! Not everyone wants a kiosk long ipad taking up the dashboard.
Yup, never understood these auto journalists and their love for big TVs in cars
The larger screens are very beneficial for older drivers that wear reading glasses but do not need prescription glasses. As you become older, it's just a matter of time before you realize the benefit of the use of a larger screen and it is very much appreciated.
I'm so glad you said that! Tell me about it! Who wants a huge 64 inch TV screen in their car! Damm I miss actual buttons😢😢😢
I say that in most car reviews these days, i want buttons and a medium sized screen to do some basic stuff, i do not want google assistant and that google App Store in my car just give me the basics and do it very well.
Well said! I only love a big screen when I'm placing racing games on my play station. Not in a car. For me 8 or 10 inch is just fine. Hell I even still love analog instrument cluster with all my physical buttons
The silence was LOUD when you asked for google to tell you a joke. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Must not be a morning person. Lol.
Literally always look forward to this guys reviews, he covers everything!!!
great been waiting for this!
It's still one of the best, and still one of the best looking in its class!!
I dont see anything online that says this was the best selling 3 row lux suv over the last 25 years that would probably be a toyota. But i will say that i own a 2013 and i love it things a beast
You are right about the 3rd row air vents. You have to run the AC on a higher mode to push air back there in the summer. A big mistake by Acura. They should also make the rear seats recline for comfort. I wouldn’t have minded an 8 seater. Acura should have put 3 seat belts in the 3rd row too. One really annoying thing about this model is it shuts off after 10 minutes of idling no matter what. You have to put the vehicle back in drive and then park again to reset that function. It is totally stupid. I have to wait for my kids when I pick them up from school and other functions. It’s so annoying. Definitely a digital rear view camera would be nice. The Lexus TX is nice with rear vents, reclining 3rd row and electric folding rear 3rd row seats.
#1. No there are no actual "vents" in the 3rd row, but there are floor opens that blow the air in the 3rd row when you use the vent and floor fan setting.
#2. 3rd row is a very tight space. Not even 3 small children are fitting back there. No need for 3 seatbelts.
#3. Idling a vehicle for long periods of time is bad for the engine. it will starve the engine block of oil and will greatly decrease lifespan of the engine. Just press the fuel pedal after a while to keep it from shutting off every 5 minutes or so.
#4. The 2nd row rear seats do recline.
#5. 100% agree about the digital rear view mirror/camera. It's crazy how much they are asking for this vehicle, and it doesn't even have this feature that vehicles 10k less than this one has.
Still waiting for an RDX Type S!
Love the styling, love the interior, and that engine sounds lovely too ❤️❤️👏👏 it would be nice though if Acura could raise the power a bit, that’s the only minor problem I have
Love the video as always Sofyan, but at 30:15 you incorrectly state that the MDX is a naturally aspirated V6 but in the beginning you tell us that it has a turbo V6
The other brands studied the MDX and made their suvs better. This suv was great 2-3 years ago but now it desperately needs a redesign. It gets the worst gas mileage. No hybrid. Has barely any leg room in third row. No air vents in the third row. The least amount of cargo capacity in the segment. No digital rearview mirror. Has more usb-a than usb-c ports. The base engine has less horsepower than its competitors. The turbo charged engine is underpowered too. I really liked the MDX but Acura has to update this car asap.
They can start by making a new v6 with a timing chain and dohc vtec.
On the flip side I really like the air suspension.. and I welcome the addition
There was 1 usb-A and 5 usb-C charging ports.
The front Grill is uniquely designed and beautiful,i grew tired of most cars with the same honeycomb designed grill
A lot of people are dissing it but I like it. It is kind of like a starburst honeycomb! Pretty unique too.
The startup sounds would drive me crazy, once is enough!!!
You are an awesome reviewer. I appreciate your speech cadence. Precise delivery. I'm subscribed now.
You have to remember too, that Julian, California is at an elevation of 4200 feet. So acceleration is usually about a half a second to a second slower in both 0-60 and quarter mile than it would be at lower elevations.
I hope this dosent suffer the from the same issues the Pilot is currently experiencing .some you tubers are saying that their transmissions are failing before 20k miles . I hate how Honda reliability is starting to fail
I believe it. My stolen 21 tlx type s transmission broke the 2 year at 25k miles (stock) warranty took care of it but mannnn.. a new car with issues already
wish acura injected some soul into this... A little more raspy exhaust note or a little dramatic gear shifts etc. For the same amount of money, you can get a BMW X3 M40i that is faster and has a super fun exhaust note.
This mdx should be 45k tops lolol im sick of this inflation
Nah, I bought a RDX Advance with a 3.5L V6 in September of 2016 and it was $43.5K then. This is a whole lot more SUV here. It's overpriced but not $30K overpriced. Not much on the market falls in the bargain category any more.
@cbotten106 I was jk. But c'mon man I'm trying to help us out!
Especially at this price point 2nd row should have cooled seats and heated 3rd row seats
Another masterpiece by Acura. Big shame they got rid of Tiger Eye pearl as a color option
Is there an aftermarket infortainment screen for 2023 models?
I like your vids & I'm plan on buy this one day.
For 76k too expensive...a bmw x5 40i xdrive is a bit above 78k...is much faster...handles better...better tune potential...argue maybe that the honda might last longer..but who cares...this is in the performance category...if i want durability im not looking for performance
Interesting how they removed the 110V AC outlet in the second row from all Advance trims for 2025. It seems like an oversight, but likely a way to cut costs with an increased price tag.
That’s a stupid omission, we already don’t have 3rd row vents and 2nd row ventilated seats and no digital rear view mirror,(all of these features can be found in the TX) now they removed another feature, also add additional 2K price tag compared to the pre-refreshed models.
@@blackwhirlwind1245 Agreed! All they did was add a touchscreen and replace the sound system that nobody had an issue with. I really don’t see the premium here over a 2024.
@@robertwood9730 yeah, so basically just a touch screen, and it should’ve been offered in the first place. B&O Sound system is alright, but no one is complaining about ELS in the first place. I hate these ICE vehicles keep going up in price. I am an Acura Fan, but I am not happy that it doesn’t offer hybrid. So I am just waiting for RDX EV though.
If I was in the market for a mid-size 3-row SUV, I'd go for the new Genesis GV80 3.5 Advance for the slightly lower MSRP, more luxurious interior, significantly more torque and longer warranty. The exterior "double line" design ethos is more attractive and visually interesting, too, IMO.
More floaty though. If thats what you like, it’s all yours.
@@davidjones2059 Sure, and SH-AWD is a more sophisticated system. However, I wouldn't buy an SUV for the sporting drive. I own two Porsches for driving excitement... and neither is an SUV! 😉
(BTW, I bought a GV70 after testing all the competitors. The Acura didn't come close to the Genesis in ride quality, quietness, luxury or engine performance. I found the X3 and Q5 ride quality rather flinty. The Macan was not only a great driver's SUV. Ride quality was excellent, too, but I just couldn't justify the 30% buyer's "premium" over the GV70. OTOH, I do tend to agree that the 2025 GV80, even with the adaptive suspension, isn't as nimble and body movement not quite as well controlled as in the GV70.)
u think you can do a video on the 2024 hyundai tucson hybrid limited?
Great review as always. Just curious why an Explorer ST wasn’t mentioned as a potential rival to this Type S. The interior is definitely not as refined, but for around $10k less def worth a look. I own one and I don’t think you can beat the value in a 3 row SUV rocket.
...absolutely, was thinking the same. Got an ST and it does performance way better than the Type S. The Type S has zero claim to performance, sure the ST has bit of issues with the fit and finish but will take it any day over the Type S
Aftermarket tuner from JB4 adds an additional 80+ HP and torque to maxime this engine transmission. Then this car hauls was
12.3 inch screen is large enough, if they do 14 inch screen, they will probably bake climate controls in the screen which is not ideal for most people. Example: Lexus TX
No.
The size of the car should be increase for the redesign with hybrid to boost the power plus the fuel consumption. RLX hybrid is on my mind now..
Absolutely gorgeous vehicle.
Im so glad I got the MDX sport hybrid it does 0-60 around the same time .. breaks are not that great though
Brakes on the Type S are very good.
Isn’t it direct and port injected?
Acura needs to bring back the MDX sport hybrid
At least make the 3 row seats power folding to the upright position if not full powered
My interest is for the Advanced…no one seems to be doing the Advanced reviews. Maybe comparing the aspec & type differences 🧐
I’ve had an Advanced for 3 years this month. It’s a 2022 with 60k miles. It’s been great only thing is the battery just recently died on it but I bought a new one through AAA. It’s a decent family hauler with 4 kids. Freeway miles are good, especially in eco mode.
There is an Advance review for 2025 out on TH-cam. But most are type-s.
Coming soon in large numbers to your local tennis club and starbucks
They should've kept the Tiger Eye pearl color as well. This needs to be a 5 sec car tho for that price. 400-425hp would've been nice. Other than that it's a nice looking SUV. Oh and they really need to add vents in the 3rd row. Come on Acura!
Edit: Please edit your videos to take out any "hey Google". You triggered my devices twice. 🙏🏼
Test drove this car. I’m not that tall but the seats were unusually narrow and short compared to segment. Created a weird pressure point in the thigh. Dealer was also asking 20,000 over MSRP😂
Still asking for over msrp? That’s ridiculous. It’s not 2021/2 anymore.
2000 over MSRP is more believable, I have a hard time believing 20k over MSRP.
The third gen MDX did 0-60 in 6 flat, and under 6 seconds in the sport hybrid. This can’t be right. C/D got 5.5 with the pre-refresh, so although that’s not great in general, I’d expect at least that.
I find Acura’s interior way classier than a TX..
The type S is a great vehicle for street performance. Handles amazing and power is more than adequate. We gotten used too Germans with high horsepower suv and somehow made that the standard for power. High hp not everything and not needed by everybody.The Mdx s is not made to de-throne them. Its a great balanced high performance SUV to add that spice to the everyday driving. Like a golf vs golf gti. Also historically with type s models like the CL and TL the type Models was enought bump and tweaks to set is self apart from the base models and increase street performance. Thats what the type S is about. Somehow we think type S should be the hardest of the hard core, where it never was meant to be. Its biggest flaw tho is gas mileage.
30:20 Come on MDX just add a hybrid battery unit to this V6 for 2026 iteration 💪
Love the look too expensive for an Acura for me
Acura need to start doing hybrid cars
They did, the Sport Hybrid MDX was released 5 years ago. At the time, the market for this segment wasn't ready for hybrids and it sold poorly, so Acura discontinued it.
Pretty much every CAR they make is a hybrid. The SUVs are starting to get the hybrid powertrains but they are starting at the bottom of the lineup and working up market. Based on what I've read a lot of buyers still want a V6 in their SUVs (or better😜), any hybrid will likely be a 4 pot.
I said the same thing cause I want one but I’m not paying $80000 for the zdx electric when I can get a Tesla for $40000
@@joelewis8992 tesla is a trash for empty people
Honda will be doing that.. Acura will go full EV as per their map plan.
Acura MDX type S have a ton of videos on TH-cam winning drag races against others in its’ class, but the TLX Type S does not match its competitors. It’s strange that a large SUV have more vim than the TLX when it comes to its competitors. What I love about Acura it’s in the middle of premium and luxury a tier 2. I love it! Check out the MDX type S in a drag race th-cam.com/video/4BwgwNIfjZ8/w-d-xo.html
The MDX is relatively lighter than its competitors, while the TLX is heavier. But the TLX is a superb handler, beating the M340i, C43 AMG and Audi S4's lap times at MotorTrend. People still sleep on SH-AWD.
Not all about drag racing, it handles and sounds amazing looks best in its class by a mile sounds amazing
BMW has no steering feel.
@@dnice362 I agree it’s a head turner
@@dnice362 th-cam.com/video/4BwgwNIfjZ8/w-d-xo.html
Brother I love yours videos since day one but you need to compare everything with the competition sound like you are never happy with any car you confuse the buyer. Keep the good work
What does thee best selling car means???
Best selling suv from that brand is that he meant
Small fuel tank and bad fuel economy low range, but outside of that I like it.
There is the HUNDAI TUSCAN HYBRED, A cheaper suv with tons of features and way less money, features that does not exist on the new Acura MDX which cost a good chunk of cash . These reviewers should have a look and relate their findings to Acura ,so they can incooperate in their future SUVs
Looks like a cutting edge design… for 2016.
DISAPPOINTING stats considering size of motor. Type S 6 sec is slow, horsepower is limited etc etc. all this for $$$$
What are paint “flecks”?
They are the glitter pieces that give the pearl/metallic paints their extra shine. That might not be the correct "technical term" but it makes the point.
This or cx 90? price difference is bigger than I thought 15k?
Top trim cx90 ?
@@harrytej top trim cx90 starts about 55k. With options about 60k? So it's 10k difference I guess
The Mazda CX-90 is a better deal than this by far.
76 vs 60 grand I'll take the cx90
No more ambient lights in the speakers 😢 my fav feature
Got the chance to drive that car the other day it's a sweet ride
My family has 2 of them. Very nice sporty SUVs. The ride quality is amazing.
I loved my older MDX but Acura needs to upgrade the powertrain. My 24’ XC90 Recharge got me 952 miles on a single tank. I’m not paying $80k for a vehicle that doesn’t provide at least 500 miles in range. I understand it’s the Type S “performance” model but the 0-60 is SLOW. If they made a PHEV version I would buy but looks like I’ll be sticking with the XC90 or the X5.
I don't get the ,argument of it needing a bigger screen because some of it's competition have unnecessarily massive displays. So you're telling me that if BMW puts a 55 inch screen on the dash, then others with smaller screens also need to. I'm sorry, but 14 and 15 inch screens on cars look hideous and add nothing. 10" and 12" screens are big enough.
Right? Maybe they should make the whole front window one giant screen
Well in the luxury space that matters. If a bmw who’s the segment benchmark in every category offered a 55in screen then yeah others would be expected to do this. After all bmws the standard by which everything else is measured
BMW is just an old legend these days. No longer taken seriously. 👎
Awesome suv and best American 3 row suv, too bad American labour drive prices so high.
The Type S has the adaptive air suspension with auto leveling
No one does reviews better than @theredline
Type S 3 liter doesn't have the 3.5 liters cylinder deactivation that may cause issues in the future of those vehicles.... I think I am going Type S....may not get good gas but it is tested longer than the other version....after a few years of possibly owning the 3 liter.... I may go for a 3.5 liter after they fix some problems it having and you never go for the new try year of any vehicle make wait a couple years... .maybe 5.... then get the other....LOL
TLX-S has VCM.
The type s get better real world mileage as many MDX owners had move to a type S once it came out. They have reported back better trip mileage than the NA version.
Just a reminder that there is a requirement for premium 93 octane for turbo cars while the NA has a minimum of 87 octane.
MPG isn’t impressive
I think the pricetag is a deal breaker for most.
Too little too late from Acura - competitors are offering much more and better
Not really. I can think of a competitor that’s worse than the MDX
Can’t believe there isn’t an RDX Type S.
That’s the one I’d buy
Leather up that high would wear and tear that's why they don't put it there. I t just makes sense with longevity.
31 speakers but no 3rd row air vents
Disagree with you on the MDX needing any bigger screen than a 12.3”. Screens any bigger than that look ridiculous and in my opinion take away from the style of the cabin. No real point in having anything bigger.
im ngl i see these everywhere
Well, my Google home device that you triggered told me a couple of jokes, so…….
76k for Acura, lost my word.
❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤
I would easily take this over the new RX
No comparison. The is the better-looking SUV, and to know they still have a V6 engine. It's a no-brainer
It costs almost twice as much though. 🤔
I would take anything over Lexus at this point 😂
I thought you were all pro Toyota Lexus 😂
@@naveenthemachine I’m not the person you think I am. Stop assuming who ppl are. I’m not predictable like you.
Judging by the new QX80 once Infiniti gets their shit together they could definitely surpass Acura in terms of overall refinement from a Japanese luxury brand. That interior could’ve come out in 2016.
Hell my wrangler Sahara can go 111mph n shut down
Who needs or should be "hauling ass" in a 4800 lb 3-row family SUV with kids and pets in tow? And, buying a Honda (oh yeah they call it an Acura) for $76,000.00, no, I don't think so.
THIS. Thank you so much for pointing this out.
Just got a ‘24 MDX Type S 75k CAD. Cancelled my ‘25 - over 100k CAD. Funny how reviewers are going crazy this year over the new touchscreen…
No VTEC? Come on Acura, give us the TEC!
This thing is still under power and no hybrid.
Give it a mild hybrid motor and it would solve improve the horrid mpg and power
Acura should start focusing on powertrain rather than technology as price increases which I would rather spend on.
I’m so over the tech talk like who wants google assistant and the google App Store in their car? Is it going to get updates? Do the people buying these actual care or do they own iPhones and don’t care about google? I’m so tired of manufacturers pushing crap on us and shoving garbage into cars.
I have a 2022 and HATE it. Transmission problems, plastic rattles inside, start stop issues, ac compressor has been replaced, and it has so so much road noise. I would be curious to drive the refreshed one but I don’t see myself making the same mistake twice.
This is a MDX *Type S* - S as in sport. I would equate to the difference between a BMW X5 and the BMW X5 M (or AMG class benz).
If that is the case, why does a Type S - Flagship Sports version of the MDX have a top speed of 110MPH??
Just get the normal MDX, the Type S is not fast enough to justify its high price. Needs to be low 5s upper 4s 0-60 for them to charge $75k…
For that price point I wouldn’t do it. But it is a nice vehicle in the inside. I’m not a fan of that grill either. Nice vehicle color and interior.
That gas mileage and acceleration suck. Durango v8 is just as quick with same mpg basically. It makes no sense. A bigger heavier expedition gets same mpg and acceleration in a non sport model. This vehicle makes no sense, just buy a pilot and take to a performance center and upgrade the 3.5 engine with a turbo. So annoying this thing makes no sense.
It does make sense. One car has 2 extra cylinders and no turbo and less torque. One has less cylinders and a turbo that requires extra fuel for extra torque down low.
Any turbo car is going feel more sporty due to torque but the downside is always flooring the pedal and wasting gas. With big ol’ explorers or other SUVs it’s moms with a light foot and not expecting peak horsepower and torque at all times.
@chrisrobles2012 I think you should reread my comment and then augment your statement because it makes no sense. The rise of turbo engines was for a better MPG figure to horsepower not worse.
@@ethany7708 it does make sense and always has. The engine is more “efficient” at HP and torque not MPG. No turbo car ever is better at mpg. It never has and never will. There will always be more fuel dispersed down low in rpm than a naturally aspirated and will always be more fuel dispersed at high rpm and boost levels versus a naturally aspirated regardless of cylinders.
I’m sorry you have a comprehension problem or understand of how tuning and engines work.
They did not need to put in that third row.
That is what the Honda passport is for.
Acura RDX with the 2.0T is faster than the MDX TypeS. Imagine if they drop the 3.0T on the RDX. It will probably sell like hot cakes.
This is what I've been asking...i guess because the mdx sells more, they completely skipped over rdx for type s treatment.
They are about the same, I believe MDX Type S is slightly faster which is 5.5 seconds 0-60, and RDX takes 5.7 to 6 seconds 0-60. Remember, this is 3000 feet above the elevation, that’s why you see 6 seconds for MDX to reach to 60 in the video.
@@blackwhirlwind1245 But if both are turbos that shouldn't make any difference, correct?
@@cbotten106 they have the different turbo engines, one is 3L turbo V6, another is 2L turbo 4. If they have the same turbo, then RDX is definitely faster because it’s lighter.
@@blackwhirlwind1245 I was saying altitude would not favor one vehicle over the other because both drivetrains are, in fact, pressurized. Different turbos, engines, displacement, weight or boost notwithstanding.
There is nothing special about the noise coming out of a V6 compared to an inline 4. It's just going to be a continuous thump. You need an uneven firing order to get some type of variance. From there it's how the exhaust is made which makes it special, and there is nothing special about that exhaust.
Dash is not leather. It’s plastic. 😂
So... The 280hp v6 naturally aspirated Honda Passport matches its 0-60 time as well as having the same all wheel drive system. Sleeper it is.....for 30k less and better gas mileage all on regular unleaded.
Passport is 5.6 seconds 0-60? Which version ?
@@harrytej 6.1 matches the Mdx in this video. 2021 Passport hit 5.8 in Car&Drivers test... Look it up.
If i wanted a car above 50k it wouldn't be an acura
Type s stuff at least needs to have 400hp like cmon