1:06:29 Clayton does a good impression of sounding ILE R Brake in his recounting of his experience with an ESI resembler. Watch the reactions of the LIIs (or more accurately, those who resemble that type model) as they don't appear to particularly relate. Clayton self types as Enneagram Type 9 (ie E9). E9 is accommodating and so is LII so LII E9 would be extra accommodating. Clayton doesn't seem to be extra accommodating (which is likely to not cause offence); instead he causes offence [imagine how much offence he might cause if not E9-like :) ]. This ILE E9 diagnosis seems relatively more likely than LII E9 for Clayton. It's also a Jung-Gulenko "temperament" thing: ILE and SEE are both Ep Flexible-Active (and have the same Causal Determinist Form of cognition and are both Right spinning extraverts) and LII and ESI are both Ij Balanced-Stable (with the same Holographic-Panoramic Form of Cognition* and are both left spinning introverts). Later in the video, Clayton talks about not being able to answer a question about liking a car or not unless a criterion is given. This shouldn't be a PoLR-indicative pain point for LII (ILE but not LII). I would have said: "It's ok. Nothing special in terms of looks. It's no Lamborghini." Then asked about features. * = See "Gulenko's Cognitive Styles" or "Forms of Thinking" on wikisocion.
Lmao at 34:56 (when did you last walk into a pole) I did this really badly in college. Had a mark on my forehead that was luckily obscured by my hair. Sorry I missed the party. Round two sometime I hope.
I did too. I was running after a friend in a game of take away and ran (RAN!) into a metal pole- I can still feel it vibrations from my forehead through my teeth. That was 25 years ago.
1:53:00 speaking of things that can get stuck in there, don't ever listen to Sabaton's song, The Final Solution. It is the most inappropriately sad and catchy song ever.
I'm ESI, I think these guys are a lovely group of people, wish i knew of some more LII type people around me i could make friends with.
I wished there was an ILE party
there will be
1:06:29 Clayton does a good impression of sounding ILE R Brake in his recounting of his experience with an ESI resembler. Watch the reactions of the LIIs (or more accurately, those who resemble that type model) as they don't appear to particularly relate. Clayton self types as Enneagram Type 9 (ie E9). E9 is accommodating and so is LII so LII E9 would be extra accommodating. Clayton doesn't seem to be extra accommodating (which is likely to not cause offence); instead he causes offence [imagine how much offence he might cause if not E9-like :) ]. This ILE E9 diagnosis seems relatively more likely than LII E9 for Clayton. It's also a Jung-Gulenko "temperament" thing: ILE and SEE are both Ep Flexible-Active (and have the same Causal Determinist Form of cognition and are both Right spinning extraverts) and LII and ESI are both Ij Balanced-Stable (with the same Holographic-Panoramic Form of Cognition* and are both left spinning introverts). Later in the video, Clayton talks about not being able to answer a question about liking a car or not unless a criterion is given. This shouldn't be a PoLR-indicative pain point for LII (ILE but not LII). I would have said: "It's ok. Nothing special in terms of looks. It's no Lamborghini." Then asked about features.
* = See "Gulenko's Cognitive Styles" or "Forms of Thinking" on wikisocion.
Lmao at 34:56 (when did you last walk into a pole) I did this really badly in college. Had a mark on my forehead that was luckily obscured by my hair.
Sorry I missed the party. Round two sometime I hope.
I did too. I was running after a friend in a game of take away and ran (RAN!) into a metal pole- I can still feel it vibrations from my forehead through my teeth. That was 25 years ago.
lol
1:53:00 Si polr be like
Why would that be Si Polr?
huh???
1:53:00 speaking of things that can get stuck in there, don't ever listen to Sabaton's song, The Final Solution. It is the most inappropriately sad and catchy song ever.
Does laura have a youtube channel?
Didn't have time to listen, were ESE discussed?)
Around the 36 minute mark
@@rajeshjogani1907 Thanks