15:54 - Leaving a campaign because of spoilers 25:31 - Changing character age limits after the campaign started (Honestly; thought it was going to be the reverse with someone wanting to play a minor.) 40:10 - Hi, I am the problem; its me. (Title of the post) 53:31 - Leaving a campaign early after someone "Um Achututally'ed" a big twist.
I put stickers on every water bottle I get! Life and joy are fleeting might as well give in to the goblin thoughts. They do peel, but meh, I’ll just put more on
In story 2: the first time the DM said the homebrew class was too OP for the campaign the player should have accepted the ruling. Like, I've had plenty of scenarios where I disagree with the DMs ruling but they're the DM and when it comes to game mechanics it's their game and you have to concede.
I allow almost anything from third party books (Kobold Press, Ghost Fire Games, Hit Point Press, etc). but if they want something truly homebrewed, I tell them it's subject to change as we go.
For a few minutes I thought I was the subject of the Age Restriction AITA 😅 I was in a similar situation where I was basically given an ultimatum. "Change your characters age or leave" for context I wanted to play a retired courtier Shadar-kai (500 years old) and I was only told I could not play a very young character. I ended up leaving because I felt like I wasn't going to be able to compromise for the concept I wanted to play. On topbof other issues and homebrew rules I was not keen on.
I have a DM that's fairly recently stated he doesn't run passives at all. Which is a problem for my charecter as that was going to be her thing outside of combat, she's a martial in a magic heavy campaign (war of the burning sky) This decision has kinda just stuck a spanner in the works for my build path as observant was something I was gonna take to help get my wis mod up. Oh and now instead of passives it's an active roll using your action. 😢
I relate to the second story in regard to having a character who is ancient. With mine, he is from an age so old it is not written in modern times (for various reasons). To get around this, it was revealed that he was born due to being tied to the God of Fate and for this reason, every so often throughout his life when massive events happened, his mind was split in two and one half was sealed inside along with his memories. Effectively it was a character that I created along with the DM whose backstory grew over time as things were revealed. Turned out fantastic and did not infringe on the 6 other players' backstories. It's hard and niche, but possible if done correctly.
Unless this person is a professional actor i see no real difference between a 500 year old character and a 5000 year old character i think the DM should've just let them have that part
Mags touching Jack with those carpet grippers, on camera?! SMH Anyone gifting me Pho will get a forehead smooch🥺 but I’m gifting my homemade chocolate chip cookies
It's a very nitpicky thing, but I kinda feel like you should acknowledge the fact that you changed your mind about stuff that was already agreed. It at least sounds from the recall that the OP just said "btw, I don't want your character be over 500 years old", without even mentioning that it was previously allowed. I realise that it wouldn't change anything, it's just a bit of a pet pive of me
@@HamiltonIsLife I totally agree that the DM was in the right to change their mind. I don't agree that they didn't need to apologize or even acknowledge that they changed their mind in the first place (perhaps they didn't think they did anything wrong, which is also valid). If I were in the player's place, I would be more comfortable with "Hi, I thought a bit more about it, and I realized that I'm not comfortable with that" than "and you also can't do that"
15:54 - Leaving a campaign because of spoilers
25:31 - Changing character age limits after the campaign started
(Honestly; thought it was going to be the reverse with someone wanting to play a minor.)
40:10 - Hi, I am the problem; its me. (Title of the post)
53:31 - Leaving a campaign early after someone "Um Achututally'ed" a big twist.
YOU'RE THE BEST! THANK YOU GRIZZLY
doodoo mentioned 40:06
I put stickers on every water bottle I get! Life and joy are fleeting might as well give in to the goblin thoughts. They do peel, but meh, I’ll just put more on
In story 2: the first time the DM said the homebrew class was too OP for the campaign the player should have accepted the ruling. Like, I've had plenty of scenarios where I disagree with the DMs ruling but they're the DM and when it comes to game mechanics it's their game and you have to concede.
I allow almost anything from third party books (Kobold Press, Ghost Fire Games, Hit Point Press, etc). but if they want something truly homebrewed, I tell them it's subject to change as we go.
For a few minutes I thought I was the subject of the Age Restriction AITA 😅
I was in a similar situation where I was basically given an ultimatum. "Change your characters age or leave" for context I wanted to play a retired courtier Shadar-kai (500 years old) and I was only told I could not play a very young character. I ended up leaving because I felt like I wasn't going to be able to compromise for the concept I wanted to play.
On topbof other issues and homebrew rules I was not keen on.
1:02:19 Idk if the intention was more to make the other guy feel bad or to just get him to stfu but either way, nose off, face spited
I have a DM that's fairly recently stated he doesn't run passives at all.
Which is a problem for my charecter as that was going to be her thing outside of combat, she's a martial in a magic heavy campaign (war of the burning sky)
This decision has kinda just stuck a spanner in the works for my build path as observant was something I was gonna take to help get my wis mod up.
Oh and now instead of passives it's an active roll using your action. 😢
I relate to the second story in regard to having a character who is ancient. With mine, he is from an age so old it is not written in modern times (for various reasons). To get around this, it was revealed that he was born due to being tied to the God of Fate and for this reason, every so often throughout his life when massive events happened, his mind was split in two and one half was sealed inside along with his memories. Effectively it was a character that I created along with the DM whose backstory grew over time as things were revealed. Turned out fantastic and did not infringe on the 6 other players' backstories. It's hard and niche, but possible if done correctly.
6:25 I was broken up with recently so... I've been better
If someone ruined a big twist or character arc moment, I'd flip the table fr. My jimmies are thoroughly rustled fr
Food gift? Id give my younger brother pigs-in-blankets (uk version).....hes obsessed
You can't tell me what to do, past Mags & Jack! 😝
Unless this person is a professional actor i see no real difference between a 500 year old character and a 5000 year old character i think the DM should've just let them have that part
i would give chicken noodle soup and I would want to be given kimchi jjigae with fresh rice. I'm just a soup sloot
Mags touching Jack with those carpet grippers, on camera?! SMH
Anyone gifting me Pho will get a forehead smooch🥺 but I’m gifting my homemade chocolate chip cookies
It's a very nitpicky thing, but I kinda feel like you should acknowledge the fact that you changed your mind about stuff that was already agreed. It at least sounds from the recall that the OP just said "btw, I don't want your character be over 500 years old", without even mentioning that it was previously allowed. I realise that it wouldn't change anything, it's just a bit of a pet pive of me
Idk I disagree. DMs day is final and they explained their reasoning . Just because you said yes doesn’t equal yes forever
@@HamiltonIsLife I totally agree that the DM was in the right to change their mind. I don't agree that they didn't need to apologize or even acknowledge that they changed their mind in the first place (perhaps they didn't think they did anything wrong, which is also valid). If I were in the player's place, I would be more comfortable with "Hi, I thought a bit more about it, and I realized that I'm not comfortable with that" than "and you also can't do that"
43:30 they just don’t like you. Please find a new group. It’s nothing you’re doing wrong but some people just don’t vibe well with others.
Sure you might be annoying. Maybe you’ve been rude. But you’re actively trying to be a better player. The DM just does not like you :(