Schiff, Republicans clash over "facts not in evidence"

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
  • House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff set off a confrontation with Republicans at the impeachment hearings Wednesday after telling witness William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, he should be "cautioned" about questions based on "facts not in evidence."

ความคิดเห็น • 702

  • @pastorjamesmiller
    @pastorjamesmiller 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    What a waste of government time

    • @leepyper939
      @leepyper939 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      And money James!

  • @alexandersankey9297
    @alexandersankey9297 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    1:41 The eyes that will haunt my nightmares

    • @ddlk9913
      @ddlk9913 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      3:32 lizard people

    • @lisarivera64
      @lisarivera64 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lmaoooooooooooo I smell a meme coming

    • @Ntw24
      @Ntw24 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I don't understand how some people can look at Shifty Schiff and think that's normal.
      Dude looks like a complete sicko.

    • @StanRams
      @StanRams 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Shiff is on drugs and commited treason so he must be arrested and put in jail

    • @tootsgirl976
      @tootsgirl976 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Alexander Sankey
      There is something behind those shifty eyes that should alarm this entire country!!

  • @johnb1731
    @johnb1731 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Schiff looks like an alien.

    • @MrRoyobentoni
      @MrRoyobentoni 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He is sitting on a strap on gin bottle he got from Pelosi

  • @idahocharley
    @idahocharley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    For being an ambassador the guy doesn’t know much of anything about the country he is paid to know about.

  • @MmmmMmmm-yq9vk
    @MmmmMmmm-yq9vk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    They are just angry that Clinton did not win😂😂😂😂

  • @reecesellers1721
    @reecesellers1721 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Back up. The timeline speaks volumes. If Trump was so concerned about the Biden's why didn't he have them investigated long ago?? Obviously money is always front and center of this administration. Timing is Everything.

    • @e.b.g7126
      @e.b.g7126 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Because Joe Biden wasn't his political opponent before....

    • @jasonsmith8802
      @jasonsmith8802 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ukraine was already investigating Biden by the time the call was made. Trump's call was about confirming that and for making sure Crowdstike's servers matched what the dossier said.

    • @jasonsmith8802
      @jasonsmith8802 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      For real though how are people like you so proud about being misinformed?

    • @reecesellers1721
      @reecesellers1721 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@e.b.g7126 Exactly

    • @stevenwilliams7297
      @stevenwilliams7297 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@e.b.g7126 you are a smart person! If I can like it twice I would have. No matter fact I'm going to unlike it and like it again

  • @merlin4398
    @merlin4398 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    where are Giuliani, Pompeo & others who were there when Trump made the call? Shouldn't they be up there defending the Donald?

    • @clarebaxter777
      @clarebaxter777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why aren't the Bidens testifying for their crimes? Joe Biden has a video on actually saying how he threatened Ukraine, coming from his own mouth, and he thought that he was so cool too! Huge coverup but their days are numbered, we will not quit until these criminals are locked up and the American people have justice. It is not OK to run our government like a Banana Republic!

  • @pureamerican5463
    @pureamerican5463 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    There’s gonna be so many people without jobs after this stupid hearing lol

    • @JrVtec
      @JrVtec 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Hayden Briggs
      Why? There's a allegation, there's evidence of the allegation, We're investigating to see if they're true or not.
      Shouldn't bother anyone except Trump but if he commit Attempted Bribery (he clearly did) he has nothing to worry about and shouldn't block ANYONE from responding to a legal subpoena if there's nothing to hide.
      Can't make it any clearer than that.

    • @belisariocastillo8695
      @belisariocastillo8695 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Stupid? Stupid are the republicans in power still backing up a corrupt person like Donald Trump.

    • @sparkysparky19
      @sparkysparky19 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Belisario Castillo you are stupid if you still believe the dems. They’re accusing trump of everything they did. They accused him of collusion when they admitted that they did and trump didn’t. They accuse trump of doing what Biden did and bragged about.

    • @anthonywalsh2520
      @anthonywalsh2520 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      JrVtec there has been no factual evidence if you listen to all of the hearing it’s full of I didn’t here it first hand I don’t know and I wasn’t there but was told by my assistant. Exactly what evidence are you referring to, if it’s the phone call the democrats have that and are not releasing it as it doesn’t do there witch hunt any good.

    • @RustyNeverSleepz
      @RustyNeverSleepz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@belisariocastillo8695 stupid, is the blatant hypocrisy displayed by the liberal Democrats and their slow-minded dimwitted supporters.

  • @lifesgood7235
    @lifesgood7235 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We the people need to put ourselves on the DC lawn

  • @wuvs2spooge
    @wuvs2spooge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Good thing we've given these clowns power over our lives.

    • @jpmdr.
      @jpmdr. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I need a decent outsider to be WH. Restore the integrity of WH and Capitol Hill.

    • @Ang3l-of-M3rcy
      @Ang3l-of-M3rcy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      YEAH, AND THE HEAD CLOWN IS IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

  • @koysamnang3066
    @koysamnang3066 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thank u so...much

  • @jakeheckler8006
    @jakeheckler8006 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    If the eyes 👀 are the window to the soul then Schiffs soul is in a dark place indeed

    • @Madrrrrrrrrrrr
      @Madrrrrrrrrrrr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Drugs? Pupils shrink with loads of light. His are still a bit bigger than normal.

  • @civil_villain
    @civil_villain 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "Correct?" "Correct?" Castor asked the most stupid and leading questions, trying over and over again to get Taylor to agree with him on the record, and he FAILED miserably.

    • @reneew5915
      @reneew5915 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Castor's questions were legit. You want leading questions? Listen to Schiff questioning McGuire. McGuire at least, politely set Schiff straight and didn't look like an obtuse idiot like Taylor.

    • @LuisTorres-pe1jf
      @LuisTorres-pe1jf 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@reneew5915 do you know the time line on that ? I missed that one

    • @mikekreen9336
      @mikekreen9336 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Failed miserably" is not a negative or a positive. Based on what the question is and who is asked, can lead to the knowledge of or lack of, rolls played by individuals. It shows an avenue to go down that may very well lead to an intersect. This type of questioning is actually on the BAR exam.

    • @reneew5915
      @reneew5915 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuisTorres-pe1jf Schiff keeps adding on "wouldn't you agree?" to the tail end of every question.
      th-cam.com/video/-QasoV0jeK0/w-d-xo.html

  • @LovedByYou
    @LovedByYou 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is the guy on the left okay?? He cant finish a sentence and talks in a very confused way😆😆😆😆😆. Like everything's a question

  • @hv9356
    @hv9356 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    All I heard was "I don't know" over and over and he's their star witness....bahahahaha

    • @v.blakheart2905
      @v.blakheart2905 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      actually he is not their star witness...

    • @panchopuskas1
      @panchopuskas1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      - because the questions have nothing to do with the witness and very little to do with the matter at hand.....

    • @stevenwood5313
      @stevenwood5313 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This lawyer guy asking questions is a genius. By forcing Ambassador Taylor to clarify things he has just proved there is NOTHING THERE. BUT You need to see this entire interview on another channel to see it all. The whole thing is a scam to protect Joe Biden and his son who is on the payroll of a Ukrainian gas company ( $50,000 a month ) , and China ( a cool $1 BILLION US DOLLARS, thank you very much ), so that he can instruct the Oval Office ( past, under Obama - and possibly future ) on what to do in the interests of self enrichment. But look, if you want IMMUNITY from investigation and prosecution, then all you have to do is run for President - then you and your family will be safe.

    • @beet4416
      @beet4416 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If the WH did not obstruct and threaten first hand witness, there would be more. Think about that - the Trump administration is BULLYING witnesses.

    • @craigkempton1
      @craigkempton1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@beet4416 how stupid do you have to be to be a dimocrat.

  • @MugRuith
    @MugRuith 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Republican strategy: ignore the facts of illegal bribery while throwing as much mud on the wall to confuse the issue as possible.

    • @billypardew2337
      @billypardew2337 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      There are no facts of illegal bribery only hearsay

    • @joesoap5888
      @joesoap5888 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Democrats strategy: entertain 5th person opinion and ignore facts..

    • @b4ph0m3t3
      @b4ph0m3t3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@joesoap5888 Democrats are gonna grab your president by the impussychment.

    • @tacticalcoffee7397
      @tacticalcoffee7397 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      sleepy joe was on TV talking about bribery, GET YA BOY

  • @impromptu_ninja
    @impromptu_ninja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I think Schiff did answer the question, I think Ratcliffe just didn't understand the answer. He made it short. He can make any challenges he wants, he's allowing a question despite facts not in evidence, not disallowing questions because of facts not in evidence. Objections on facts not in evidence will be most likely be heard. They may not be sustained, but they aren't being disallowed.
    Counselling Taylor on the issue was quite the right thing to do after having him asked if "... some elements of the Ukrainian establishment ... were out to get him" after leading it with a mile long string words that included a few "facts not in evidence," theoretical adversarial elements and events, sheesh.
    They may or may not exist, but they gotta actually appropriately introduce this stuff and not just try to sucker out some double edged responses on a complex situation.

    • @gacj2010
      @gacj2010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Schiff wouldn't answer about future questions .. he said he would let this question be answered...Schiff is now appearing to me as not as bright as he would like us to think ... He's going to blow this thing anyway

    • @anthonyd5192
      @anthonyd5192 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @James Allen You clowns are watching something different than I am. The dems aint looking too good today. 😆😆😆

    • @stevenp25100
      @stevenp25100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Schiff is supposed to be the chairman of the committee, not the witness's lawyer giving advice

    • @The-Musicians-Edge
      @The-Musicians-Edge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@anthonyd5192 So the Republicans talking about everything else totally unrelated to Trumps corrupt actions is what you think looks good? Deflection is not a defense

    • @impromptu_ninja
      @impromptu_ninja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@stevenp25100 That's true, but in any similar scenario, a chairman of an inquiry, a judge in a court of law, or anyone in a comparable position of authority has comparable responsibility to the poor non-guilty fellow being grilled. It's pretty common, accepted and appreciated. Taylor's not a defendant, he's a witness. It might be different if he was being accused or something. You might even argue he's guilty of something - but then you're way out in left field because this is a hearing.
      John Bellinger is Taylor's attorney, he may or may not have counselled him on the topic but the point stands that Schiff's interjection was not inappropriate.

  • @dennisking5281
    @dennisking5281 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is a clown show and we are the ones paying for this crap!! We have KIDS starving and this is a waste of money!!

  • @brianarps8756
    @brianarps8756 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is remarkable how much the key people liaising with Ukraine for the US, didn't know.

  • @jameslaverick2150
    @jameslaverick2150 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Very poorly worded questions.

    • @Colgruv
      @Colgruv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Incredibly convoluted. I probably couldn't keep a straight face in Taylor's position

  • @mike67able
    @mike67able 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    All hear say.....

    • @beet4416
      @beet4416 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Then let Trump testify, he's got first hand. PLUS the transcript is FAKE! The real one is locked in a secured vault!

    • @surfpsych
      @surfpsych 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hearsay testimony is typically permitted in preliminary hearings and grand jury proceedings, which determine whether a defendant will actually be put on trial.
      In a congressional setting, the House impeachment proceedings function much like a preliminary hearing. Ultimately, the House will decide whether to vote on articles of impeachment, the functional equivalent of a grand jury indictment. Those articles of impeachment would then go forward to the Senate for trial.

  • @zkeletonz001
    @zkeletonz001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Most of this "testimony" was this just this guy giving his opinion about things and now Shiff wants to worry about "facts not in evidence." lol

    • @bklynluv6171
      @bklynluv6171 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Zkeleton Z right? 🤣🤣🤣

  • @pokerzore
    @pokerzore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Schifft act like a father of Mr. Taylor. Another word schifft try to act as the father remind his child to answer the right questions.

  • @sumtingwog1273
    @sumtingwog1273 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Those are some nice chairs they're sitting on!

    • @fellogoodfella
      @fellogoodfella 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      If you pay taxes then you technically bought it! They should be sitting on folding chairs !

    • @sumtingwog1273
      @sumtingwog1273 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      fellogoodfella I pay taxes. And all of them are sitting on some nice chairs I don’t own a chair that looks that nice in my house.

    • @sumtingwog1273
      @sumtingwog1273 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      danbanrock1 I agree with you! Did you see that wood grain double stack desk from wall-to-wall? Where do you even order something like that?

    • @fellogoodfella
      @fellogoodfella 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The chairs are thousands of dollars and I don't own one either. It's a shame that these people, so disconnected from the common citizen, are pushing our country towards the goals of those same individuals who sit in those chairs.

    • @sumtingwog1273
      @sumtingwog1273 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      fellogoodfella That’s exactly what I mean. We need to start calling out things like this.

  • @cmp319
    @cmp319 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Where did the republicans find this Castor guy at the thrift store? All these body movements and schmucky facial expressions are killing me. Trying to jumble up pointless questions. Sounding like an amateur, like this is first time asking anyone questions, but trying to appear cool and confident. What a nightmare.

    • @TheRbruin10
      @TheRbruin10 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Check out Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan. Those are the Republicans with good questions and the ones who exposed the Democrats, not this guy. CBS didnt want to show you the other Republicans who had REAL QUESTIONS.

    •  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Democrats aren't human.

  • @bbeautifulporsche
    @bbeautifulporsche 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Idk just like a toddler when they are lying lol

  • @vince9649
    @vince9649 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    schiff doesn't know how to answer a question

    • @frankelizalde9306
      @frankelizalde9306 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      vincent benveniste Extending this further, Schiff knows how to NOT answer a question. Also knows which questions to BLOCK or prevent. Cheers!

  • @nicolasraage
    @nicolasraage 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Someone told me they heard this guy is a flat out liar....They should put me on the stand to testify to this!

    • @malancronje6805
      @malancronje6805 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Somebody told me that he overheard somebody say Adam Schitt sucks his own balls, while directing traffic with his eyes.

    • @nicolasraage
      @nicolasraage 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@malancronje6805 This is something that we should at least investigate.

  • @shapeach
    @shapeach 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What this dude is describing with Attorney General Barr and President Trump and President Zelinsky is standard Foreign diplomacy. There is nothing wrong with that at all. Happens all the time and in every administration.

  • @billwaterson9492
    @billwaterson9492 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Jesus Christ aren't these guys lawyers? Why can't theys talk no goods?

    • @andrewpark7016
      @andrewpark7016 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is youz stoopid? Look at ur own poorly worded comment before all this talking no goods comes out ur face hole hehehe

    • @siricecoldmars3046
      @siricecoldmars3046 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andrewpark7016 no....I refuse to believe a man can be that dense...and if your being serious God help you're soul you poor thing

    • @andrewpark7016
      @andrewpark7016 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@siricecoldmars3046 Lol I was clearly kidding

    • @siricecoldmars3046
      @siricecoldmars3046 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andrewpark7016 Sorry I think I've lost my touch at sarcasm on the internet but you can never be to sure on the political side of TH-cam. I take this L with Grace.

    • @slewone4905
      @slewone4905 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are better at drawing comic strips than making jokes here. Please draw more Calvin and Hobbes.

  • @Rowgue51
    @Rowgue51 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The clash wasn't over facts not in evidence. The clash was over what rules the hearing is supposed to be operating under. Because Schiff outlined a very specific set of rules for these hearings that ignore all standard house rules and all normal rules of evidence. Yet in the middle of questioning he's suddenly interrupting testimony to direct a witness not to answer or at the very least be cautious about what answers to give to certain questions that may be considered improper questions under normal rules of evidence. You don't get to very intentionally suspend all normal rules of evidence to allow all the testimony you want as part of the record and then assert rules of evidence as justification for suggesting a witness shouldn't offer certain testimony.

  • @Axhole11
    @Axhole11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Schiff is ridiculous.

  • @JT-sj8nx
    @JT-sj8nx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is worse then real house wives of anything. What a joke of time, money, and what a disgrace or power

  • @angeleyes7417
    @angeleyes7417 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    He is mentioned Trump was concerned???? Taylor just tripped!!!!!ha

  • @newlion7013
    @newlion7013 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Another CHAM!!!! I'll be voting republican enough is enough

  • @athena_the_hun1097
    @athena_the_hun1097 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    They don’t know Trumps concerns about Ukraine but the seem to think they know what’s in his brain about quid quo pro

  • @johnyouiel3247
    @johnyouiel3247 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Just remember nobody is talking about the fact that the ambassador was chosen by Obama.... so I hope this is the actual last time I say this but THANKS OBAMA!

  • @brendanfoster5548
    @brendanfoster5548 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    It sounds like trump dictated this to an intern, and told him "read this!"

    • @deebonash1495
      @deebonash1495 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao... found a betamale. Only assertions huh. Mention about obama bowing down to syrian terrorist, or Clinton at epstien's island. You wont right.... justkeep bending over to your boyfriend

    • @cosuinofdeath
      @cosuinofdeath 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Deebo Nash betaaaaaa uhmazin

  • @blaisegordon1
    @blaisegordon1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We need facts and evidence

  • @deb6616117
    @deb6616117 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Adam Schiff needs to be put in a straight jacket enough said

  • @studiosandi
    @studiosandi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I love Adam Schiff's professionalism.

    • @timj.8056
      @timj.8056 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Schifty Schiff is a corrupt politician who spews lies, hate and confusion. A sham to smear the President!

    • @tylerfrank637
      @tylerfrank637 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Tim Z. Adam Schiff has more intelligence and honor than anyone bearing the last name trump will ever have.

    • @elkeater8672
      @elkeater8672 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Honesty and Integrity are the cornerstone of professionalism. Adam Schiff has neither.

    • @TheRbruin10
      @TheRbruin10 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tylerfrank637 hahahaha! this is a joke right, Adam Schiff intelligence and honor lol good one

  • @Dude408f
    @Dude408f 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    From 0:31 to 1:23 the most moronic and childish question. 1:25 face of the ambassador: WTF?!?!?! LOL!

    • @compleatmeadmaker
      @compleatmeadmaker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Saw the Dems' attorney questioning. Knows he's been outprepared and is outclassed. He's nervous as all get out, and can't keep his hands off the mic.

  • @jaypapa8751
    @jaypapa8751 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I consider myself a cross party voter. I vote on the candidates based on their policies not their political party alliance. All I can say is that, we're already pretty divided as a country and impeaching a sitting president can not be the answer. I would rather see him voted out or re-elected by the people than this circus. 2020 is around the corner, instead of working on important issues like health care and drug prices, homelessness, education, jobs and infrastructure.....I'm watching this. Really? #bothsidesuck

  • @GaveMeGrace1
    @GaveMeGrace1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Being that he’s a US Ambassador (I’m assuming he’s not a new appointee), of all people, he should know the appropriateness of the President asking another President to look into something.

    • @Amigps01
      @Amigps01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not really. That has to do more with rules, regulations, and precedents that are in place. The guy is an ambassador not a lawyer. He would have limited understanding if there would be any legal issues regarding these sorts of contacts. I'd be surprised if he did.

    • @GaveMeGrace1
      @GaveMeGrace1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amigps01 - I see what you’re saying, and yet he’s in the business of dealing for foreign dignitaries as a go between us and them. Some familiarity mahouts be innate in order to determine when a foreign power wrongfully deals with him (quid pro quo). Sure it’s not the exact thing, but similar enough. I suppose that doesn’t mean he’d have to.

  • @teambeforeself6839
    @teambeforeself6839 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This dude needs to figure out how to ask a freakin question... This whole process is a goat rope.

    • @Skybloodable
      @Skybloodable 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Read the Damn Transcript Pencil Neck Chithead ! What a waste of Taxpaper money ! This is making the Dumbassocrats look like total fools and will forever make the dem party look like a gang of crooks. The End dems. -- Bye forever and Good Riddance !

    • @johnmoore5293
      @johnmoore5293 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      A kangaroo court

  • @youtubeAIDigitalContentCreator
    @youtubeAIDigitalContentCreator 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The comity herein these proceedings has all the underpinnings of agency, serving an administrative function, with that come the agency's duty to promulgate rules, if the rules exist only in the head and mind of the leading member and seem to constantly change then these proceedings are unconstitutional. There needs to be an emergency petition to the US Supreme court to determine this agency action in that all must be stricken and started anew with established rules......

  • @angeleyes7417
    @angeleyes7417 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Funny Schiff is refusing to let the question be asked

    • @seanjvm
      @seanjvm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He specifically said he will allow the question but made them aware of certain situations.

    • @kevinquinn3763
      @kevinquinn3763 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He has Trumpitis.

  • @bbeautifulporsche
    @bbeautifulporsche 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Evidence is facts

  • @chuckb8945
    @chuckb8945 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Judge Judy would throw Schiff and his witnesses out of her court room.

    • @garrymiller3171
      @garrymiller3171 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trump is a criminal. Get over it

    • @jeremiahG4
      @jeremiahG4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@garrymiller3171 prove it. The dems sure can't if this is their best.

    • @chuckb8945
      @chuckb8945 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@garrymiller3171 Joe Bidden and his son just won the election for Trump.

    • @garrymiller3171
      @garrymiller3171 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chuckb8945 if Trump voters are that ignorant to believe conspiracy theories

    • @chuckb8945
      @chuckb8945 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@garrymiller3171 Biden's son got a million dollar a year part time job in a country most people couldn't find on a map and you can't smell the rotten fish. LOL

  • @johnmoore5293
    @johnmoore5293 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the point of order question but is it true Republicans have to have Schiff approve Republicans choice for witness list? If this is true can we make a point of order that if Republican witnesses are screened and deneyied by Schiff how is this not a kangaroo court? ( ignoring standards of law or justice).

  • @dreday2ka
    @dreday2ka 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wtf kind of questions are these. I find it pretty disrespectful to treat Taylor like this. He’s a real patriot. They should some respect

    • @DatlTAE
      @DatlTAE 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are about why Trump would withhold funding for 55 days. Its legal for the president to withhold congress mandated funding as long as he explains to congress why if asked. Most common reason to withhold over estimated project costs. It destroys the quid pro quo argument.

  • @aarti2108
    @aarti2108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Why is this guy making this kind of face. That’s how he speaks to his kids at home?

    • @outbook
      @outbook 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL

  • @davidfarmer3218
    @davidfarmer3218 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    win or lose all this calls tax payers millions and millions of dollars why??? all these people investigating and the senators asking questions aren't they all ready paid a salary from tax payer dollars? so why do we have to pay more for them to do their jobs that they are all ready paid to do?

  • @shahnulislam9897
    @shahnulislam9897 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about you guys ask questions about the facts of the events and not chase a rabbit down a freaking hole

  • @elizabethburns1449
    @elizabethburns1449 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    The Ben Stiller lookin' member makes some pretty interesting faces.

    • @mikekreen9336
      @mikekreen9336 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ben Stiller...…….BAW HAHAHAHAH :o

    • @clarebaxter777
      @clarebaxter777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @David L He did an excellent job, that weasel Taylor was humming and hauling, he definitely said that he didn't know the President and he clearly said that he was "told" that President Trump asked for the investigation! We need to investigate Taylor! Sick of these liars!

    • @clarebaxter777
      @clarebaxter777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And that weasel Adam Schiff's eyes were about to pop out of his ugly head! Why is he adamant about impeaching President Trump? What crimes is he covering up? We will find out, he is dirty!

    • @rickjensen2956
      @rickjensen2956 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Taylor looks like fred Munster and is about as smart.

    • @rickjensen2956
      @rickjensen2956 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That would be Herman Munster played by Fred Gwynne.

  • @coriagarcia9163
    @coriagarcia9163 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    They will regret doing this to the workin classs

  • @johnbrooks3750
    @johnbrooks3750 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Schiff was made fun of in school. It is still happening in his adulthood.

    • @kevinquinn3763
      @kevinquinn3763 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You must be talking about Jorden.

    • @thismodernmonkiedelection1647
      @thismodernmonkiedelection1647 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The whole school I bet ran from him, he scared the teachers like an N-word , and got expelled, even disqualified for homeschooling.

  • @101km7
    @101km7 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Funny how mr. Taylor has no problem reaching conclusions and interpreting presidential intentions without having first-hand knowledge on so many issues raised by the Democrats but as soon as the Republican start asking questions about what he believed the president's intentions were he suddenly is unable to provide his opinion

  • @paulapisces590
    @paulapisces590 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What stupid questions the Republicans ask

  • @amandagirlygirl12
    @amandagirlygirl12 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Castor talks about Manafort resigning, and then segways into some diatribe how that means the Ukrainians were out to get Trump..... ???? How? When there was a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT Ukraine government??? Led by a competent businessman, not some actor?

  • @eseale1
    @eseale1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "Chairman" Schitt has lost control of this parody Kangaroo Kourt and we're all better off for it. This is hilarious!

  • @RSS10000
    @RSS10000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hearsay Hearsay let this be over, what a joke

  • @MikeUIibarri
    @MikeUIibarri 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How you like them apples!?

  • @dennisjanda5081
    @dennisjanda5081 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Is Taylor giving his testimony secondhand ??..Just Askin' !!

    • @Planetcharr
      @Planetcharr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes. and he's basically saying ... I heard it from, who heard it from, they heard it from... and i'm sure the Dems watching this are rolling their eyes but at the same time to save face... will still take the testimony as hardcore 1st hand facts...while everyone else in the world is asking: Is this the phone game?

    • @ezek3187
      @ezek3187 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think most of it was 4th hand... gossip...
      I suppose a CIA field agent (Whistleblower) would know how to create discord within governments.... I am sure they are trained to do it... I am sure they have done it before in my lifetime a few more times than I remember... but that is why they exist, isn't it? I am sure they understand how to manipulate people and take advantage... They are trained to work in the shadows... I am absolutely sure of these things..

    • @fredricandersson9756
      @fredricandersson9756 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rep are blocking first hand witnesses.

  • @onelife7511
    @onelife7511 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Adam eyes when he stare looks like a vampire ....scary

  • @blkhemi3925
    @blkhemi3925 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    (Schiff:) don't assume facts not in evidence before you.
    (Also Schiff:)Please tell us about a phone call you didn't witness, in which a conversation took place that you didn't listen to, between a 2 people you never met.

  • @Planetcharr
    @Planetcharr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok, it doesn't help that the counsel member asking the damn question sounds like he's gonna have a stroke. I don't like Schiff as well...however I believe he has a point in that the question being asked sounds like 3 different things in 1 and only 1/2 of what is being asked is about the core of the matter. Schiff did right in interrupting the questioning with caution.

  • @aarti2108
    @aarti2108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This person is wired questioning Taylor. Like his eyes and lips 🤣🤣🤣 what is he doing 🤣

    • @beverlyelzen3763
      @beverlyelzen3763 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He's more than wired, he appears to be intoxicated. He and Trump probably snorted prior to the hearing.

    • @aarti2108
      @aarti2108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Beverly Elzen exactly how I felt! Intoxicated 😅

    • @thisoledad1946
      @thisoledad1946 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He’s asking easy questions and the Ambassador can’t answer. I’m not aware is not an answer that someone who is supposed to know implied thoughts of the president.

  • @jpmdr.
    @jpmdr. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Guys, Who really care about impeachment? We need to talk about automation and job losses. No matter who gets into wh, one must solve the problem automation destroys jobs, 80m in 16 years, according to an article by Merrill Lynch. Automation destroys jobs and towns. What to do? No jobs, no family, then addiction and depression...scary

    • @xenuk5398
      @xenuk5398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      automation will lead to a universal basic income

  • @Burke396
    @Burke396 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    #walkaway

  • @sandraarce633
    @sandraarce633 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    After congress approved and released the aid,show me the document that said Trump/Giuliani .....needed to investigate the gov.of Ukraine.....I guess not.

  • @christopherjones4462
    @christopherjones4462 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Warch Taylor's reaction when the Durham investigation is mentioned.

  • @peterhudson5748
    @peterhudson5748 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    trump said to contact his personal attorney Giuliani NOT Durham. that is not official channels.

  • @Johnyrocket70
    @Johnyrocket70 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol this isn't a court trial it's an inquiry.

  • @blackroyalbrand1287
    @blackroyalbrand1287 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Why is his eyes so dam big 🤣👁👁

    • @jasonwoods840
      @jasonwoods840 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It’s a common trait of leftists continuously lying. Little Adam schitt, aoc, Pocahontas...all of them have the bug eyes

    • @JasonTraxler
      @JasonTraxler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@jasonwoods840 Hmmm, I thought habitual lying caused orange skin and tiny hands

    • @tolstoy8124
      @tolstoy8124 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cocaine

    • @cynthiamadle6383
      @cynthiamadle6383 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's what a rat in the corner looks like when the lights come on

    • @jerrodcarter7537
      @jerrodcarter7537 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Crystal meth

  • @kabbey30
    @kabbey30 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Schiff is so good... at taking it in both ends...at the same time. Hence the bug eyes.

  • @bigmuffin99
    @bigmuffin99 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Taylor: 'I heard that his response' hearsay !

    • @surfpsych
      @surfpsych 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hearsay testimony is typically permitted in preliminary hearings and grand jury proceedings, which determine whether a defendant will actually be put on trial.
      In a congressional setting, the House impeachment proceedings function much like a preliminary hearing. Ultimately, the House will decide whether to vote on articles of impeachment, the functional equivalent of a grand jury indictment. Those articles of impeachment would then go forward to the Senate for trial.

  • @gl1500ctv
    @gl1500ctv 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does the minority attorney keep adjusting the microphone position? It completely distracts from what he is saying.

    • @compleatmeadmaker
      @compleatmeadmaker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He's panicked. He's a chess player down two rooks.

  • @human151
    @human151 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s beginning to become obvious that trump did nothing wrong here.

  • @williambingham3408
    @williambingham3408 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why are you just showing Dems?

    • @gmeister03
      @gmeister03 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Uh. Did you not see what channel this is?

    • @williambingham3408
      @williambingham3408 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gmeister03 Oh Yeah lol

  • @arlypaulmigueldamuy5221
    @arlypaulmigueldamuy5221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Schiff's eyes are so terrifying?

    • @sarahrobinson9140
      @sarahrobinson9140 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      scrambo mills Just like your President, punk!

  • @MegzeeR
    @MegzeeR 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So posts made on social media accounts are credible evidence now for legal prosecution witness testimony? Well, gosh, then I read on said fb page that Mary's nephew heard his teacher tell the school principal that she heard that the Superintendent planned on skewing a few "hot dogs" at the next "camping trip" to the "Smoky Mountains" (wink, wink) Dear God, how much embarrassment is more than anyone can ever recover from in public?

  • @shawa1939
    @shawa1939 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Is this a joke? What is wrong with the democrats? And I identify as one..........smh.....

    • @jcar2412
      @jcar2412 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only purpose of this is to suppress the epstein story
      I used to be a Dem, btw

  • @thecynic807
    @thecynic807 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Schiff interrupts and tells witness hey dont mess this up.

  • @grahamsclater9988
    @grahamsclater9988 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this for real?

  • @juanmatos6796
    @juanmatos6796 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NOTHING NEW BUT A SHAM IS STILL A SHAM

  • @jimschmidt8628
    @jimschmidt8628 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So boring,

  • @pauladams833
    @pauladams833 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is he holding his breath or pooping?

  • @angeleyes7417
    @angeleyes7417 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ambassador doesnt know his job?

  • @nocommnunists
    @nocommnunists 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So sick about those GOPs in this hearing!

    • @lonewolfy5621
      @lonewolfy5621 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why? Trying to get to the truth of the matter bothers you?

  • @sandraward116
    @sandraward116 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ..unkind things on social media..let's not remember what the Pres himself TWEETS every and any day about others..FOUL BALL sir..🐩🐩🐩

  • @MamaMia-ye2be
    @MamaMia-ye2be 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    And I suppose Dump was insulted. Who hasn’t Dump talked bad about

  • @MRDAMNICK1
    @MRDAMNICK1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    He is doing those a
    Eyes as a warning to the witness not to answer. This is ridiculous. Since when does the judge, act as the person being questioned lawyer?!

  • @55ostaR
    @55ostaR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Just to show you how people can turn on you..PS Adam look scared

  • @anthonywalsh2520
    @anthonywalsh2520 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Full of I don’t know I didn’t here it first hand etc etc pack of people who lost there gravy train jobs and are bitter.

  • @GaveMeGrace1
    @GaveMeGrace1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you- the attitude of Ambassador Taylor after Adam Schiff’s interruption dramatically changed. His body language seems to have shifted from open and cooperative to somewhat fearful or even cowed (by a veiled threat?). So whatever on earth just happened? Did I catch something or am I reading too much into what I saw? Maybe he was just unnerved?

    • @firestarter105G
      @firestarter105G 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We'll probably never know what was said or took place in the basement "star chamber" before the public hearings started.

    • @elbee5191
      @elbee5191 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hamlet Fortinbras
      You really aren't paying attention, are you?

    • @GaveMeGrace1
      @GaveMeGrace1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      el bee - you’d have to clarify what you specifically mean by that statement.

    • @elbee5191
      @elbee5191 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GaveMeGrace1 "...the attitude of Ambassador Taylor after Adam Schiff’s interruption dramatically changed."???
      Adam Schiff was trying to get Bill Taylor to stay on point, and not feel obligated to answer the Jordan, Nune's-Cow or other Ohio Imbecile's WORD SALAD questions.

    • @GaveMeGrace1
      @GaveMeGrace1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      el bee the ambassador is under obligation to answer and Schiff seemed to be subtly obstructing that. In any case, the man seemed taken aback, if not shaken. You can call Jordan’s clear line of enquiry “word salad” if you want, but I don’t.

  • @lour9309
    @lour9309 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IS THIS SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE ? WE LOVE YOU MR.TRUMP !!!! #MAGA 2020

  • @joesstockmail
    @joesstockmail 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is a waste of tax payers money .. Im voting for Trump ..

  • @angeleyes7417
    @angeleyes7417 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is this plaintiffs words, not ukraines president or president Trump's!! The plaintiff words are just heresay period.

  • @yoitsahmad
    @yoitsahmad 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Social media posts are now facts? I can't....