@nuitNo.6 You're aware that George Orwell was an anarcho-communist who observed and fought in the Spanish Civil War for anarcho-communism, right? Because using the language from 1984 to criticize American "communists" for simply arguing that the policies that have produced inequality along racial lines should be fixed to produce equality actually goes against the philosophy of the author whose work you're alluding to.
Gokart Mozart In some of Chomsky’s essays he seems to use “libertarian socialist” and “anarcho-communist” interchangeably, and I’d say Orwell is more attacking Stalinism than all definitions of socialism or communism. “Socialism in one country” is one of the central fallacies of Stalinism he attacks in Animal Farm and Catalonia.
@@druze3210 Because definition of being a bigot is one that is intolerant of others holding a different opinion. Bigotry is not always a negative thing
@@tboyer86 well if kendi had a leg to stand on (is that racist?), he could bolster his positions (is that racist?). If he cared to spread his doctrine, I’d expect that he’d want to entertain potential new listeners (is that racist?). But I don’t think his positions hold up. Because he’s a grifter (that must be racist?)
@@EbluestarE When is the last time you saw a college professor engage in a public live debate? That type of forum is theater, not an open exchange of ideas. When was the last time you watched a presidential debate and was convinced of anything. If people want to challenge his ideas do what he did...write a book or an article and submit it to peer review. Have you actually read his book btw?
Yes. I'm a pink-skinned heterosexual male with a bald head who is slightly browned from going to the tanning salon a couple of times a month. This guy is too hyper-focused on racism. He uses racism (or antiracism) as a panacea to solve just about every social issue. This is wokism in action and pseudo-philosophy.
"Not accusing people of being witches isn't good enough, now you have to point out those who would accuse another of being a witch for being coveted or weird. If you don't, you have condemned those who are accused as much as if you accused them yourself." Or in other words, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Fixed that for you.
@@jakemartinez6894 Silence allows the violence to continue. If you don't speak up and put a stop to it, the violence will keep happening. You're defending the bystander effect.
@@TheKarret Glad to see you’re building schools right now instead of typ…. Tell me, how much does whatever you watch TH-cam with cost and why wasn’t the cost contributed to a worthy cause.
So called 'anti racism' seems to be about seeing race in everything. Rather than anti-racist, I would call it anti-liberal. I recommend James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose book Cynical Theories for people who want to understand how supposedly intelligent people can reach these kinds of absurd conclusions.
“Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject.” - John Stuart Mill
Excellent reminder of Enlightenment thinking, The Kerret. "Capitalism conquers poverty" -?? In our dreams, no examples of that yet, even in (non-preditory) 'Natural Capitalism'
@@tboyer86 own it and read it. how would two people discussing issues cause them and others to learn something? it's simple....you learn when your beliefs are challenged. i'd like to listen to such a discussion. avoiding it is to just not want your beliefs challenged (and never learn anything)
He daren’t do it because the shallow circularity of his arguments would be exposed. That’s the kind of thing that could be exposed through dialogue by asking questions.
It is definitely problematic on many levels. I think solid evidence exists for some sociological factors which have led to where certain people are today in the hierarchy of our world. It is much more complicated than what is being presented here though and the judgements hurled are a turn off to whatever truths they may express.
@唐三藏 well, seeing as I have freinds and family of varying ethnicities, I would prefer they stay in my community, but I am allnfor segregationists leaving America. We have no need for the collectivists or zealots who care more about superficial identity than the individual.
I tried to read it....got 10 pages in and had to stop because of a horrible smell in my room. Then I realized it was coming from the book. Hateful, divisive philosophy disguising itself as truth. The man's a grifter. I mean literally. Check into his "Center for Anti-racisim" and try to follow the 40 million dollar money trail. There doesn't seem to be a trail!
@@okoverallknowledge564 it's almost like vigirously attacking someones past and removing historical figures, & attacking what amounts to iconic fiction might feel like a racist attack.
Have you done the research to prove that this idea of being antiracist has not been challenged? Also if you have the gull to comment behind your keyboard, why not come out the closed door and challenge the various antiracism researchers, teachers, and trainers in a formal setting across the US. When you do present your challenge, make sure it's recorded so we can all watch and learn.😉 Thanks in advance!😎
@@lilyzemengist8091 It's seems to me that in the politically charged climate that we now live in, if he were to do that he would most likely be attacked ad hominem for that. People, like you, would rather target him than his ideas, logic, or reason. The sarcasm and obvious vitriol in your reply epitomizes this. You cannot point to disparities between groups and claim racism, sexism, etc. Here's an example for you. According to the Roland Freyer study out of Harvard, police do not kill unarmed black people statistically more than they do white people. This is a multivariate study backed up by other independent studies looking at police departments all of the nation (researcher is black btw and expected a different outcome so no confirmation bias!). Yet, if I were to say this and challenge the current narrative that black people are being systematically targeted and killed by racist cops, then I would be attacked by a mob.
Coleman Hughes wrote counter arguments in his article “how to be an anti-intellectual”. But yeah, I agree. I’d love to see Kendi debate in real time because his arguments are riddled with logical fallacies.
Much of the tactics they utilize have a chilling effect on dialogue. Cancel culture seems to be a direct result of this ideology. In the universities many professors are quite aware of the consequences of criticizing this stuff. There is a guy called Benjamin Boyce who has a channel that documents how these ideas played out at Evergreen State College that is pretty interesting/disturbing. A professor was accused of being a racist, and a white supremacist, when he refused to comply to a request to all white people in the school to voluntarily absent themselves, on the grounds that the request was discriminatory. He was the only dissenting voice not because he was the only professor who disagreed but because he was the only one with the courage to face the mob.
@@elomnusk4015 @Elom Nusk I have a few questions and a request. 1. Who ARE 'people like me'? 2. What do you mean by people like me? Please elaborate. I distinctly said to challenge the IDEA. 3. Where is the cruelty in my comment? 4. How is the topic of antiracism political? 5. What 'mob' do you fear would attack you and in what way specifically? 6. My request: provide the link to the study you addressed in your comment. I request this because, if your comment is intended to teach or shed light on something specific that's being misrepresented then any and all who view it should be able to access your primary/secondary sources.
This man has never debated anyone about any of his ideas. How strong are those ideas? Let's create a whole ideology via the appeal to emotion. Data does not matter for this appeal to emotion
Who cares? When was the last time you saw an academic do a live debate? You don't see Neil DeGrasse Tyson debating flat earthers. What would be the point in debating someone who isn't even a scholar in a live debate when the point of a debate isn't even to see who has superior research and logical discourse, but to see which one can win favor with a crowd of people who probably already have the mind made up. When was the last time you watched a Presidential debate and changed your mind on who you were going to vote for.
@@tboyer86 So his opinions can be rationalised. He is possessed by a chaotic, sporadic ideology that hasn’t been questioned at all. It’s like how lockdowns have bred these radical views from all sorts of people-when you remove discussion and discourse from people’s lives, it’s like taking the brakes off a car for their opinions.
@@WinningThisOne What evidence, study or research do you have to back up that claim? The idea that scholarly work isn't peered reviewed simply doesn't ring true to me. Having worked in academia I know how rigorous the writing and research process is. Kendi's most famous book "How to be an anti-racist", while not an academic, peer-reviewed book, is based on his second book "Stamped From the Beginning". This book was heavily peered reviewed. He published several articles before completing the book, all of which went through the peer review process. The book was then submitted to the editorial process, which is much more intense for academic books than it is for say a book of fiction. And he presented his findings and research at multiple research conferences where he receives feedback from his peers. Also, the idea that Kendi doesn't engage in public debates because he is afraid to is nonsense. If anything, he doesn't do it because there really isn't any incentive to. College professors get paid to do two things: teach classes and write research papers/books. Their tenure is based on those two activities. What purpose does going on some podcast with a non-academic to be yelled at and condescended to serve? There's really no up side.
They think "If you refuse to admit you’re racist, that means you are both mentally and emotionally "fragile" , as well as racist. If you admit you’re racist, at least you aren’t "fragile". Admission of racism is clearly the "better" of the two options (for the ideology)". If you deny that you are a witch, then you are a witch. And if you do not deny it, then you are a witch for sure. It's a kangaroo court & a kakfkatrap.
The problem is, usually in these situations, people are talking about two different definitions of racism with each other. Where one side is talking about systemic racism, which is a complex system based on centuries of inequality that influeces everybody on a subconscious level, the other side just hears "you are a person who intentionally insults and wants to hurt people who are not your skin color". And this is simply not the same thing. Admitting you have grown up in a society with systemic racism at its backbone is the first step to healing long-ingrained injustice and inequality, it doesn't mean you are part of the KKK.
I think you're missing the point, Jose. The point isn't defining you as a racist. The point is defining our society as fraught with racist systems--not the sort of systems a single racist person perpetuates, but that we all allow to exist via apathy. Listen to him carefully, and you'll recognize that he calls out every group in America, including minorities that bear the brunt of racist systems, for engaging in racist thinking. Who cares who is or isn't a racist? What matters is that everyone should be treated equally, and our society clearly doesn't do that at large. Think of it this way. A building is smouldering. A businessman stands outside a building, and there's smoke coming out of one of the windows. A resident comes up to him and says, "This could turn into a bad fire--come up to that room with me and let's try to put it out." The businessman says, "I didn't start that fire, and I sure as heck aren't responsible for it. Is this my neighborhood? Let a firemen come and put it out." We cannot blame the man for being an arsonist. But would we admire this man? No--as the building burns down, we'd condemn him for being a bystander. The same thing goes with racism in America. We may not be "racists," by the KKK definition of the term. But by not taking action, we have failed to oppose the racism. And so racism lingers. Kendi asks us to stop letting racism be someone else's problem. That's the only way our children's children won't have to grapple with the same iniquity.
Pure sophistry, he's arguing that a human being's default state is racist and the only away to be not racist is to be "antiracist". The argument is constructed to compel a person to want to embrace this so called "antiracist" ideology and all the linguistic gymnastics that goes with it. What complete bullsh|t.
The idea of "There is 'not racist', just 'racist & anti-racist' " is a false dichotomy, like "You can't just 'not be a witch', you are either a witch or helping me burn witches". It's a manipulation tactic to push you to do what you don't want or aren't sure about.
Problem is, if you try to have an honest debate with them, they start using Post Modern double speak. The skills they have are extensive, but only useful if you are trying to undermine society through hatred and lies. useless at everything else.
Watch out when people try to implement sorting algorithms for determining whether you're "with" or "against". Especially when they are very eagerly redesigning the language according to their ideology.
It could be a slippery slope, but really all that he's trying to get you to realize is that by not participating in breaking down racist structures, you're helping to perpetuate them. That is all. You can try to break down racism any way you like, but if you're not doing that, you're helping maintain it, and you're doing something racist.
Looks like Cosmic Origin decided to dip out on this comment/delete... So here's the repost: "dogchaser520 Right, just if your not a murderer/rapist, but you don't do anything to stop murder and rape, your therfore supporing murder and rape, and guilty of being a murder/ rapist. Makes total sense" This is a fair point. But rape and murder are both active crimes. Racism is not even a _crime_. It's only passive. It's a behavior, not a crime. Don't think racism is criminal, or even necessarily evil. It's just not terribly useful. It's a mind-virus we're trying to work out, a product of a less-developed age. We'll get there; it's just going to take time and thought.
This faux intellectual has said this in his book How to be an Antiracist: 'The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination. The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.' Talk about an evil, toxic, prejudiced, racist mind.
Yes, he did say this. His point is: discriminate to produce equal outcomes (equity) and not equal opportunity (equality). This means providing more funding to traditionally underfunded schools, for instance. Schools are funded _totally_ unequally. Right now they are not remotely equal. It's pure evil. But people oppose equal school funding. He would go a step further after equal school funding and provide more funding to those areas who have more people who are part of groups that have had schools historically underfunded. Is this right? Well, I'm not sure. But it does make you think, and I like that. It demonstrates that right now, what we have is incredibly backwards and evil. We need to actually start getting pissed off about it. One reason Kendi is so popular is _because_ he says stuff like this, which actually gets people talking. We've become immune to these effects and just accept them as normal. They're not normal, they're not OK. We're not even giving equal opportunities, much less equal outcomes. Let's start with equality, at least?
@@dogchaser520 Every time, humanity has aspired to equality, it has lead to death and misery. People are not equal, we are individuals with each our own unique needs, wants talents and skills and trying to pigeon hole people into some utopian vision of equality will never end well. Instead of concentrating on "equity", which is just a dumb idea and a rebranding of equal outcome, try and concentrate on simply increasing peoples opportunity and freedom to choose said opportunity.
@@emperorpicard4901 So ending slavery, ending feudalism and the concept of nobility, letting anyone other than White male landowners vote, equal rights for women and non-Whites ... those were all just "death and misery"? What you mean to say is clear: it led to annoyance and discomfort on the part of the privileged class. You happen to be part of the current privileged class, and that means that these changes _will_ be uncomfortable for you. But the reason we keep having this discussion is not because everything is wonderful now. We have these discussions because not only do we not have equality of outcome, but we also don't have equality of opportunity. For example, many inner-city schools in economically depressed areas are funded by property taxes in the area, and as a result rely on ragged 20-year-old textbooks and an underpaid and overworked staff. I agree that we should work to increase opportunity (including funding schools across the state level rather than county, district and so on), and if you want to work toward such projects, I applaud your efforts. That does not mean that relative equality of outcome _across averages_ is not a desirable goal. We don't all have to be the same and we don't all have to "win" at this cruel game called life in a neoliberal society, but we should still be working to correct historic inequality.
@@dogchaser520 Ending slavery, feudalism and nobility etc where not exercises in "equality" but simply a recognition of rights, there is a fundamental difference. A recognition of rights is individualistic in nature, its a recognition that people can and should make their own choices and that if you wish someone to follow your ideals, you have to ask them, not force them. A recognition of rights is the exact opposite of equality, or may I remind you that all slaves where equally enslaved. As soon as slavery was ended, these poor people started diversifying and perusing other ventures then the cotton fields. "What you mean to say is clear" rather then making presumptions, try and work on understanding. "it led to annoyance and discomfort on the part of the privileged class." Actually, it led to the exact opposite. It turns out that people are generally the most productive when they are free and have their rights respected. The whole of society benefited from having people rights respected. "including funding schools across the state level rather than county, district and so on" If government run schooling has failed so far, why do you think that more of the same would succeed? I give you an alternative solution, competing schools in a free market that will reduce costs and increase quality, and increase peoples opportunity and free their choices. "and if you want to work toward such projects, I applaud your efforts." Trying to centrally plan projects never ends well. So no, I do not wish to work on such projects, because I do not have the arrogant presumption of knowing what people need and want. "That does not mean that relative equality of outcome across averages is not a desirable goal." It is not a desirable goal, people are not averages, again people are individuals. I give you a true story as an example, the air force once tried to save money by designing a pilot seat that could fit ever pilot (rather than having many different pilot seats for different pilot sizes), so they measured every pilot and came up with average measurements and designed a seat for such measurements. It turns out that the seat did not fit a single pilot, why? Because people are not averages and come in all kinds of shapes and sizes. Recognizing that is the first step to recognizing that chasing averages for people is just a dump idea, rather focus on increasing peoples productivity, simple help them become the best version of themselves that they can be, while recognizing that "best" is subjective. And if you think about it, this is a rather healthy lessons we teach our children, saying to them "don't measure yourself against your classmate, don't worry about his achievement, but worry about your own, focus on your own improvement etc", so why would it be different in adulthood?
You sound stupid, like the slave owners who believed they were doing the slaves a favor by feeding and housing theme , without racism he’d have a different career.
Also in speaking to Non Western peoples from China and India they said their culture was far more racist than America or Europe was. Kendi is an ignorant grifter. Propped up by morons. He is a weapon of mass distraction
@@mindisflowershop2017 the problem with people like you is you think your some hero or good person amd have to constantly validate that to yourself. While at the same time let the super powerful brainwash you into doing there bidding which will never benefit you. And you believe this as your new religion to the point of hopelessness and unwillingness to learn on your own. You could never have an intelligent conversation with anyone if you believe ibrim is anything but a race addicted racist idiot. Your 10000% part of what's wrong with the country. Change
As a minority myself, I've grown up in a community with little racism. I received more flack and teasing for growing up Mormon than for growing up Asian. So my experiential context and Dr. Kendi's are very different. I see race as "a" problem instead of "the" problem, if that makes sense. So, naturally, I disagree with him on various topics and issues and agree with him on others. I like his idea that a person's action or speech in a given moment can be racist without classifying the whole person as racist. I also agree that if a person makes a mistake, they should admit it, change, and become a better person. On the other hand, at least in this presentation, his arguments about economics and politics seem to overly simplify complex issues. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Dr. Kendi, and hopefully we can all continue to learn from each other from different sides of issues and find common ground.
He is obsessed with race. It is very troubling to listen to him speak. I think he is still racist and is confused by his own racism about how to look at social problems and see the solution for problems that have nothing to do with race.
@@QuatMan wtf are you talking about? The worst systemic racism in America is against Asians. They are literally prevented from accessing college because they do too well.
38:14 There are "so many" other countries with models we could implement here? Be specific. Name one. Name something. Name anything that has some semblance of diversity in terms of race, ethnicity, class, etc. and what that country does. Give us something to work with, rather than this generalizing. This question was an opportunity to put real legs onto his theories. Just start with one example of a country with similar circumstances doing something that is transferrable here.
the world is racist.; In Cuba, Brasil, etc, people with darker skin are prejudiced against. This happens all over the world; religious differences, skin color, disabilities....people are so unloving, internally violent, and live in competition rather than cooperation out of a scarcity outlook, that racism is prevalent all over...wake up and smell the coffee Joe
Not so much. He's known for his writing and not his appearances. Give the book a read. It holds a silver bullet for how we can get beyond cancel culture. Racism is a mind-virus. Treat those with it as sick, and seek to get rid of the virus. We don't execute people for the crime of having cancer, because they are a victim.
@@dogchaser520 Is that the same book in which he stated that _"Racism is incurable"_ in one chapter and in another chapter he talks about being cured of his racism by a close friend? Are you talking about the same book where re recommends a *Racism Czar* to be appointed and granted the power to confiscate privet property... *_Bruh.. They don't make crack cocaine strong enough for me to take this dude seriously._*
@@dogchaser520 This creepy sound so similar like the cult idea of "everyone is a sinner, except those who join my cult and do as I told them to do, without any question"
@@dogchaser520 Critical Theories is a convenient & demagogic identity politics backpedal, to have something to fall back on when they know they've lost, fallaciously attacking the speaker's inmutable characteristics, instead of making a real counterpoint to the argument. Because a smoker tells you that smoking is bad, the fact he's an smoker, doesn't make what he said any less true, the truth is the truth, no matter who speak it.
@@dogchaser520 so why is he making CHILDREN BOOK'S for 4 to 7 year's old saying children should admit if they are racist you fucking kidding me how is a little child racist wtf is this world. We come so far with racism to fall back in with these type of people who get praised we all bleed the same colour we are not at fault at the past to be judged now so why are children being brought in to this this guy is a race baiting for cash simple as that
People are already divided into racial groups. White people sometimes don't realize it because they are the ones who aren't oppressed. But minorities face the fact that they are treated differently all the time. Which doesn't mean all white people treat minorities differently. And sometimes the few minorities in power also support white people over minorities. The net effect is that nearly every minority experiences being shut out from opportunities due to the way they look.
@@ellafoster-molina2288 'White people sometimes don't realize it because they are the ones who aren't oppressed.' - non falsifiable statement "But minorities face the fact that they are treated differently all the time." - non falsifiable statement "And sometimes the few minorities in power also support white people over minorities." - non falsifiable statement "The net effect is that nearly every minority experiences being shut out from opportunities due to the way they look." - non falsifiable statement The entire religion of interesctionality and critical race theory is built on non falsifiable statements.
@Benjamin, if only more people appreciated your great analogy and saw the divisive quasi-intellectualism that this guy and the wokists are trying to pull on humanity....
@@secondheaven9545 Same as "nepotism" was rebranded as "net working" and "torture" as "enhanced interrogation techniques". The trick is the double speak.
I think you'll notice that Ibram isn't blinded by the idea of "nonwhite people can't be racist" - he believes they can be - even against white people.... so idk what redefining you're talking about. :Va
It’s funny, I’m a Hispanic man but I don’t think of myself a Hispanic, I’m just a man. I have a different culture than others which I both love and find annoying. I also find that I both love and dislike other cultures, and frankly I won’t have anyone tell me what I can and can’t like. Ibram, you are a racist, you see the world by race. In your eyes I am only a “Hispanic “ man rather than just a man. You don’t see the content of my character sir.
I'm Croatian and you are right this guy is a racist. He makes money by selling books on division and does not really care about dividing this country and different groups. Hopefully people wise up and quit enriching people like him and not buy wha he is peddling.
You’ve hit the nail on th he head. This is one of the craziest dammed ideas that a person can be reduced to their color or gender or sexual orientation! I mean Really?? I am female and white but don’t feel female & white. I just feel like me. In fact how can a person know what a particular attribute feels like unless they can be more than one person simultaneously? Human beings aren’t simple. From all my reading and study it appears that reductionist thinking leads to dictatorships, oppression and lots of bloodshed. No thanks. I like this imperfect Democracy.
@@heavyglamrocker1987 Exactly, if "people of color" try to argue against the left, they just say that they have been brainwashed and don't know what they are feeling, almost racist isn't it.
Mmmmmmmmmm people are reacting to a lot of things Mr Kendi did not even say. He is not saying that all non-blacks are racist. Nor is he pushing a far-left anti-White agenda. Jeez. The point is we all need to do the hard work of confronting our own biases. And more specifically how policies create or help to maintain inequity.
Well, one of the problematic things he said was that a white person needs to acknowledge that their success may be due in part to the advantages of systemic racism and failing to acknowledge that makes you racist. The reason that is problematic is because there is no accurate way to even begin to determine which privileges contribute to a person's success. Yes, there is white privilege, but there is also the privilege of gender, nationality, religion, beauty, IQ, personality traits. There are so many factors involved in a person's success. But he is so passionately sure that it is white privilege specifically that makes a person successful. From a scientific perspective, it's just a crazy claim.
@@mbags2575 I also take issue with his proposed Department of Anti-racism which would apparently have authority to discipline officials who do not voluntary change their racist ideas and thoughts. I assume this means the dubious definition of racism Kendi and people like Di Angelo subscribe to.
FROM THE GUY WHO COULDN' DEFINE RACISM WHEN ASKED TO DO SO. What I get from is discourse is basically that the definition of racism = well.. racist ideas... history... society. Victims. I haven't really studied history and I love to generalize.
This is a slippery slope , I support the fact that police brutality and systemic racism is terrible and I would express that opinion under any circumstances. But there are other battles to be had , that exist , so no , not being actively devoted to the cause doesnt mean you are racist . That's the kind of bluriness in your speech . It reminds me the bush speech "either you're with us or against us " the world isn't a duality it's complex .
However when you take a vocal stance about a current very real problem in the world instated into culture and society and still mention there are more important things out there then what are you doing for these other very important things besides just casually mentioning them to try to diminish the impact of this very important issue for many people? If you got a purpose focus on that instead of things you deem not so important?
Bad-guys from WW2. Landing in Normandy = antifa. Leader of army that Landed in Normandy = antifa People destroying the statues of that leader = antiantifa? fa? Is BLM "fa" because they smeared statue of Churchil? No, no, no. For these people world isn't only black&white but there is only one thing you are allowed to care about. Do you remember the word "tolerance" they yelled back in the days?
@@ileanamon3352 If I get into a debate with someone , I will support the movement , the harsh reality is that I haven't heard a single person say that what happened to that man that day wasn't utterly atrocious . We're dividing more than anything because now people who aren't actively supporting the movement are deemed racist . Because this has gone out of the actual state of fighting for human rights and equality no matter what "race" (I don't like that word ) and more into a social mouvement where white people try to prove how great they are , making this more about them in some cases then the actual mouvement . This entire mouvement as a whole is beneficial I think. But the deviances of fights for social justice in the modern age can be dangerous. If you don't agree with something related to the mouvement you can be deemed racist. Exactly like the at the end of ww2 when the population would go after anyone who had had vaguely had something to do with the Germans , even unfounded rumors were enough to get lynched or humiliated . Huge angry mobs are dangerous because of their lack of nuance.
He provides a definition of racist as an adjective which I'm ok with ... 'racist is a descriptive term. It defines what a person is saying or doing at any given moment expressing racist ideas like black people are lazy.' That's fine. But I don't agree that you can then call up that person as a racist - using the noun as a sledgehammer. But that's what is happening. These aggressive, ambitious, thrusting people claiming the black community as their constituency lash out anyone not paying lip service to them, 'You are a racist.' Racist the adjective is just like saying someone's rude or ill-mannered or ignorant, all far preferable terms. What we need to do is get the word racist, and all the professional charlatans who ply it, out of the whole discussion. Then the people left in the discussion can have a sensible conversation.
Violet Fyxe Hating people because of their color is wrong. And it doesn't matter which color does the hating. It's just plain wrong. Muhammad Ali. #Okoverallknowledge
Metal Gear brother I have just mentioned a Muhammad Ali quote. I didn’t mean to hurt anybody. I’m wondering what made you say to that. Anyway have a good day. 😊😊
It's exactly the same. You can be "not fascist" but be ok with people being fascists, in which case you are supporting and allowing fascism, aka pro-fascist (despite not "identifying" as one yourself). Or then you can be against fascism, aka anti-fascist.
Yes, and there are more and more ideological activists preaching on TED which is turning it away from science and into soap box. Pity, TED was such a great idea.
I mean, TED has always had a political position/agenda (pro capitalist & liberal corporate elitism), it could just be that this video is different than their usual fare and so you're recognizing that politics are at play, when political assertions are always present.
"The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination." -Dr. Ibram X Kendi "Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past." -Gerorge Orwell 1984
“Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject.” - John Stuart Mill
This guy's arguments can't stand up to the scrutiny of other intellectual individuals who disagree with him. That's why he consistently refuses to have open discussions with any of them because he fears that he will not be able to substantiate his arguments against tough criticism. But you know, he has the chance to prove me wrong. Simply have those discussions. If he believed so deeply in his ideals, then he should be MORE than willing, even eager, to defend them against any dissenting opinions. Yet he won't and he can't.
@@nicolasdesautels2848 Changing his name from Henry to Ibram and the "African" hair extensions is cosplaying ( marketing) to the white, affluent NPR crowd.
I think these terms have to be applied to all people. Blacks have to be antiracist also. Also , we need to differentiate between results based on skin color vs results based on culture. Example, does skin color or culture determine fatherlessness? Does this affect future success? Or does city living vs country living affect life choices .
Hating people because of their color is wrong. And it doesn't matter which color does the hating. It's just plain wrong. Muhammad Ali. #Okoverallknowledge
All you have to know about Ibram Kendi is his assessment of the police officer that shot Ma’Khia Bryan. Supposedly in the 8 seconds from upon arriving at the scene till when Ma’Khia Bryan had a knife to another girl's throat the police officer should have de-escalated the situation, and the reason the police officer didn't is because "SYsTemIC RaCiSm"...
Kendi: "People can never be racist. Only ideas and actions are. The goal is to do and say fewer racist things over time." Comments: **WHITE FRAGILITY INTENSIFIES**
The time has come to go back to the 60's. The revolutionary movement that toppled Jim Crow pushed back racism, strengthening the self-confidence of Blacks and the entire working class.
@@Charles.Wright You mean like during slavery that you could buy the father and perhaps allow him to come a few days a year to visit their children's? Yeah!
These comments are a cesspool of people trying to justify racism through the most absurd mental gymnastics. How people with so much cognitive dissonance sleep at night is beyond me.
@Puck Shack Marxist Conflict Theory is specifically economic, related to the inherent divide between bourgeoisie and working classes. Professor Kendi is not discussing societal issues through that lense; but instead a more specific racial conflict theory. If you expect me or anyone to take your criticisms of Kendi's theories seriously, then I'd recommend being specific about what your criticisms are... which implies reading his material, something I doubt you've done. (Also, if you intend to draw parallels between the racial conflict theory as posed by Kendi to the Marxist conflict theory of ... well, Marx ... then I'd recommend reading Marx as well. Also something I doubt you've done.)
I don’t think we should allow people to redefine language at their will. People are trying to redefine the term “racism” so that it can be applied in a sweeping way across entire groups of people without regard to the actions of individuals in that group. This is incredibly divisive. This might help move some people to action but it is not going to help us build a better society together.
@@ThisisKyle Even by that definition.. Blacks can be racist.. so it's even more idiotic.. OR alternatively PEOPLE can't be racist.. because racism via that interpretation is a systemic/power thing.. and people are not institutions..
@@ThisisKyle Some people trying to redefine the word. So far, people with certain ideologies only added a separate definition that they use with one another. The orignal definition of racism still stands, and will continue to as long as people are averse to the racist redefining of words.
@@ThisisKyle Given that black people have so much power that the largest media and social media platforms in the entire United States of America back them, it's arguable that the redefined racism is going to backfire, since the current paradigm grants all of the power to non-white people and the current social mores basically REQUIRE prejudice against white people
Words are redefined all the time, but it seems like people only seem to really get upset about that when the new definition doesn't fit their worldview.
When asked what it looks like to be in a place where WHO he is matters rather than WHAT he is, he immediately starts with, "As a black man..." and then lists ways he feels as a black man. Did you notice that?
Critical Theories is a convenient & demagogic identity politics backpedal, to have something to fall back on when they know they've lost, fallaciously attacking the speaker's inmutable characteristics, instead of making a real counterpoint to the argument. Because a smoker tells you that smoking is bad, the fact he's an smoker, doesn't make what he said any less true, the truth is the truth no matter, who speak it.
When people point out that the woke come out with ideas so ironically racist their response is basically always something along the lines of the ends justify the means. Kendi literally says that the cure for the discrimination is discrimination. How do you even argue with somebody so detached from objective reality? When you point out that their whole premise is that racism is bad yet they want to purposely engage in it, they turn around and call you racist for having that thought. It's literally beyond belief that anybody takes these people seriously in any capacity.
It takes someone with mindfulness and compassion to stand up to an injustice that did not happen to you. Anti-racism is looking at a situation and noticing if you got preferential treatment and then speaking out for the person who was unfairly treated. It is about going about your life noticing and thinking about what others are going through and if something happens, even a small thing that could make someone’s day better you do it. Observe, think and then act based on fairness.
@@karamiciek7722 I agree entirely but the injustice has to be clear and real and not imaginary. You cannot decide based on back reasoning from unequal outcomes. That is terrible reasoning and will not only not help anyone but will make things much worse
@Anthony Joseph You are perpetuating the same identity nonsense. The point is identitarians on the right and left are the problem. Organizing people into identity groups and blaming them is sick right wing ideology.
@@discogodfather22 sick right wing ideology? Have you had your head buried in the sand these past few years? There is only one political party currently blaming an entire group of people for things they havent done in America. Stalin, Mao all did that as well. Hitler, too. Isnt national socialism technically left wing? Know what you're talking abt next time
Yah... the lack of cultural output from America and being overtaken by other countries like Korea was the clear indication that America was in the dark ages. Now it’s even more obvious with the rise of the cult of identity politics that the dark ages has been upon us for a long time.
I’ve seen him say in multiple talks that “there’s either something wrong with people OR there’s something wrong with power and policies” and I just feel like that is such a simplistic and juvenile outlook. Completely lacks nuance.
The point is that if you look at America, there are very clear racial disparities across almost every measurable axis. If you start with the assumption that there really isn't a difference across racial groups, that humans are essentially equal, then this will lead you towards the truth that certain policies in the USA have impacted different racial groups disproportionately. It is a simple fact of history that white people in the USA , in general, have long had access to more resources and sources of wealth generation that have non-white people as a direct result of power, law, and policy. When those laws and policies changed and slowly became more equal (extremely recently historically speaking, after over 100 years of blatantly racist policy) all that accumulated wealth and power did not just suddenly vanish. Furthermore, policies such as red-lining and disproportionate law-enforcement (particularly when it comes to drug offenses) have fed into that cycle of disparity. Is this enough nuance for you? Humans have individual agency, and we are also highly influenced by our environment and our access to resources. When policies and laws have limited certain groups access to resources and limited options, we see the racial disparities arise.
I grew up thinking that racism was discriminating against another person because of their race, skin color, or even culture and ethnicity but I guess not anymore. I guess the true definition of racism is the act of not believing that everyone is racist and more specifically the act of disagreeing with the Kendi.
That dude in the middle is so comically racist that he basically spent this entire talk explaining how the whole world around him is racist and that he holds the fountain of knowledge on how to combat or fight against it. Still, the woman on the left is pretty good looking.
It gave me chills when my girls(13 and 14 yo) started chanting "you should not be a racist, you should be an anti-racist!" So I asked what does it mean? they said they dont know. So I told them to forget about it and be nice to everyone no matter the color of their skin. They said okay! and went on their way. Indoctination is happening, guys. This is like a cult targeting mass population.
So I'm either racist or an anti-racist. There is no in between. The mental gymnastics he must have committed to in order to fill an entire book is astounding.
This is a man who has been left to stu in his own racism for years while people in academia have been afraid to tell him his ideas are insanely divisive snd straight up racist. Everything wrong with higher learning can be summed up in this video.
@@funkydanieluk That's not what he said at all. He said that people can't use the fact that they adopted a Black child (or have Black friends) as "proof" that they won't do or say anything racist in the future. I've seen woke White liberals often be quite explicitly racist and not know it...
I feel like Kendi could actually have a worthwhile discussion with someone who was willing to engage critically with his arguments instead of simpering, wooden hosts like these who take whatever he says as gospel.
Who would dare do that in this age? To be called out as a racist for disagreeing with this pseudo intellectual hustler? The whole ideology here is manipulative and designed to shield Kendi from any rebuttal or skepticism. It’s 100% a hustle for him.
He couldn't, and he Won't. He has refused to debate people he knows would rip his racist ideas to shreds. He is the classic definition of a race grifter.
Racism is very literally believing that another race as a whole is lesser. If you don't believe that, you're not a racist. Plain and simple. You don't need all extra this mumbo jumbo.
The idea of "There is 'not racist', just 'racist & anti-racist' " is a false dichotomy, like "You can't just 'not be a witch', you are either a witch or helping me burn witches". It's a manipulation tactic to push you to do what you don't want or aren't sure about.
The idea of "There is 'not racist', just 'racist & anti-racist' " is a false dichotomy, like "You can't just 'not be a witch', you are either a witch or helping me burn witches". It's a manipulation tactic to push you to do what you don't want or aren't sure about.
Institutional racism: Constitution of Liberia Article 27 b. "In order to preserve, foster and maintain the positive Liberian culture, values and character, only persons who are Negroes or of Negro descent shall qualify by birth or by naturalization to be citizens of Liberia"
I want to see this guy speak with someone who will push back. Are there any videos of him in discourse with an alternate view? This TED talk and many others with this guy are often one sided.
Search Brett Weinstein ( Darkhorse) on TH-cam. Prof Weinstein recently interviewed seven black intellectuals that would crush Ibram X Kendi in a debate of ideas. Mr. X talks/books and paid appearances are geared for a white, affluent audience and not the general public.
@@sladegrey9272 left wing people do constantly debate people but you can’t change everyone so eventually u have to give up and stop trying to debate/educate people who r ignorant and not willing to change. put that energy into things or people who r willing to change.
Oh ya? If you can see it so clearly, why didn't you provide an example of him being "so damn racist and divisive"? The only "funny" thing, is that you didn't do that.
@@basquegrand8982 Equality is everyone gets the EXACT same treatment, regardless of circumstances. Equity is the idea that a person's circumstances should determine the response we give. Hth!
@@basquegrand8982 That's why it's a goal or an ideal. Something we try for. Right now we don't try very much at all, though. Example: public schools are still mostly funded by property taxes, so the quality of education for kids has a lot to do with how rich or poor an area is. I'm not OK with that.
The idea of "There is 'not racist', just 'racist & anti-racist' " is a false dichotomy, like "You can't just 'not be a witch', you are either a witch or helping me burn witches". It's a manipulation tactic to push you to do what you don't want or aren't sure about.
"Anti-racist" is Orwellian doublespeak for anti-white, or as Kendi would say, anti-whiteness. Adding the ness makes the ignorance and hatred legitimate.
I've been looking everywhere for a debate or discussion between kendi and anyone who disagrees. I agree with some of what he's saying but his cowardice is a bit off-putting. Until he deals with the legitimate criticism thrown at him I refuse to support him and his work.
@@WinningThisOne Good attention to detail! When I say "attention to detail" though, it's more like an awareness, because you can typify the quality of linguistic tactics being used. "Dialectic" is an important term to know, because it contrasts with the concept of a "Debate" in the modern world. As soon as you understand that, and a "Steel Man" argument by comparison to a "Straw Man" argument, you'll practically hack into conversational dynamics for the rest of your life. Truthful articulation functions precisely the way Good Vs. Evil functions in our archetypal stories. I live in California, and I still feel a bit sad Mr. Elder didn't become our Governer. Highest regards
Kendi comes across as believing what he's saying, but what he's saying is incredibly ignorant, unscientific, and hypocritical. "For minorities, don't take individual actions as indicative of the group - that's racist. But, believe me when I say that there is systemic and institutional racism.". If he believes that denial of being a racist is indicative of racism, he should speak to his own racism, wouldn't that be internally consistent with his beliefs? Either he admits being a racist, and should elaborate, or he denies being a racist, thereby making him a racist, and he should then explain himself, no?
@@mindisflowershop2017 I wish I could to go to one of those rallies, it looks interesting. Better that than wallow in guilt or feeling oppressed all the time. Life on your side must be miserable.
This guys definition of racism is and I quote "racist policies that result in racist inequity based on racist ideas." So since he can't even come up with a coherent definition of what racism is he's objectively unqualified to speak on the subject. You cannot define a word with the same word you're attempting to define unless you're 5 or a liar.
No one would claim that mainland Chinese, Ashkenazi Jews, northern Indians, Ebo Nigerians, and Japanese (Americans) are outperforming white, African American, and Hispanic Americans in education and income, significantly, because our society is institutionally benefited to slant towards those minority groups. Why then are the plight and disparities of certain ethnic groups, in the US considered the sole responsibility of other outgroups? Absurd. Achievement not "privilege". Take Native Americans, who have been receiving their so called "reparations" for decades and are the poorest ethnic group in the US. What is the net result of reparations and affirmative action, historically, for those people being "helped"? This man is just another race hustler and so called intellectual.
It's a wonderful interview technique not to challenge the interviewee. I'm sure if Thomas Sowell, who uses more of his brain when asleep, was being interviewed... they would treat him with kid gloves...
"We are raising whole generations who regard facts as more or less optional and they are being taught that it is important to have views and they are not being taught that it is important to know what you are talking about. It is important to hear the opposite view point and more important to learn how to distinguish why view point A and view point B are different and which view point has the most evidence or logic behind it. They disregard that, they hear something and they get some rhetoric and run with it...Get some facts first, know what you are talking about, before you start spouting out this kind of stuff." - Thomas Sowell
Mr. Kendi is a racist himself, he values people based on the colour of their skin instead of the content of their character. Thank you for setting back race-equality back 5 decades, and at the same time dividing the general public (people, of all colours) in a time where they should stand together. But I don't think he really cares and that his books sell well this way. For all people who aspire to become a scientist/ academic. Always try to keep a presupposition and believe-bias out of your studies and research. Mr Kendi is a perfect example of what happens when you start every new topic of research and study biased, thinking you already know the answer, and try to support the answer with your research / studies. Then everything can be lead back to your answer (in his case: racism), it is just laughable this man is considered an intellectual by some people.
It is not racism all the time when we talk about criminals. I think you are totally missing the point of this issue. And if you really want to talk about the relationship between criminals and racism: what percentage of white criminals have been shot by the police and what is this percentage regarding POC? Even when the person next to a police officer is a criminal, he has no right to shoot him (and KILL him) unless the situation is very evidently threatening. If police officers can do whatever they want to criminals, then what is the purpose of justice, of law?
I'm currently reading STAMPED FROM THE BEGINNING so I decided to see if there were any videos with Prof. Kendi. He's brilliant. I wish I could say I'm shocked by all the hate in the comments section, but I'm not.
I’m not racist, I have four black tires and a colored tv In all seriousness, to sound like a boomer, you should always treat people with respect regardless of skin color But let’s face it, we’re all not equal or all the same … Africans built Africa, whites built Europe, Asians built Asia… our cultures are different in their own rite and that’s ok. And it’s ok to be “racist” to be uneasy when you’re a minority around a group of large peope (ie a white person in a black neighborhood and vice versa a black person in a white area) it’s a survival trait, it’s a gut feeling to keep your head on a swivel. This guys BS is left wing garbage, if he’s unhappy he should take Louis Farrakhans route and wish to separate peacefully Oh… and he’s saying latinx… 😒
It’s so hard to watch this, yet it’s incredibly important to understand those with which you completely disagree. Remember folks, there are ONLY two types of people. Racists and Anti-Racists. If you’re not his definition of anti-racist, guess what, you’re racist. Read Thomas Sowell if you want to actually understand race and the world. Not this racist.
“Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject.” - John Stuart Mill
When asked about specific countries America could emulate, he never stated a specific country or policy America could emulate. He then encouraged everyone to ask specific questions about policies and actions, when he was just asked to give specifics but didn’t. On that same question he said “There are countries with more people than us but less people in prison.” Avoids specifics. There are only 2 countries with a higher population: China and India. China is a communist dictatorship that swiftly silences dissent and India’s median household income is less than $2000 a year while still hosting some unbelievably rich billionaires. If there’s anyone we should take lessons from, it’s not China or India.
'There are countries with more people than us but less people in prison.” Those countries don't have 13% of their population with a 73% out of wedlock birthrate.
it’s sad that racism is spread across the globe. Yet, you trying to find an idea that you don’t agree with IS BECAUSE JUST LIKE THE RESIDENT WHO TRIED TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT AND END DEMOCRACY, YOU’RE A RACIST! GET WITH IT
“After suddenly laying off over half his employees last week and with his center producing almost nothing since its founding,” writes David Decosimo in the Wall Street Journal, “Mr. Kendi is now facing an investigation and harsh criticism from numerous colleagues complaining of financial mismanagement, dysfunctional leadership, and failure to honor obligations attached to its millions in grant money.”
@@Andy329 The people who hate this garbage certainly aren't. Those teaching this woke garbage are doing their very best to resuscitate racism, which had been in it's death throes as recent as 5 years ago now.
@@sirellyn Literally every finding of the social sciences refutes the idea that racism has died. Among a GIANT POOL of studies tackling racial-disparity-phenomena from: medical outcomes, to arrest rates, to sentencing outcomes, to housing values, to rates of pollution in comunities, is the cited study below. As recently as 2017 there was a major study which revealed, through experimental means, that racial disparities in hiring are still extremely socially prevalent 45 years after the Equal Employment Opportunity Act was ratified. Racial double standards and applicant selection. Authors: Doerer, Sharon Clemons1 Jr.Webster, Murray2 mawebste@uncc.edu Walker, Lisa Slattery2
@@solidaritytime3650 I'll take a look, but before I do let me just make sure: - None of these scientists espouse critical theory, or have used critical theory claims to base work. (Which are on their own 100% unscientific) - This is a comparative study, rather than showing any slightest trace of racism exists... (This is NEVER a test for the presence of something, as in any scientifically "clean" room you'll find dirt still.) ...it shows a COMPARATIVE of known discrimination based on skin color and it's effects vs a similar test in most other countries in the world, and over at least the last 30 years. - Their sample size is at least in the 10's of thousands in a diverse area. - The study is falsifiable. Assure me it doesn't breech these 4 very basic tenants, and I'm happy to read it. Otherwise I'll assume it's in the same stack as feminist glacial theory paper stacks.
The money I would pay to have this dude sit down and debate Thomas Sowell or Larry Elder or Walter Williams
He would NEVER do that, as it would spell the end of him.
Truth! I don’t think he could stand up to Thomas Sowell or Larry Elder.
@10en6ixty6ix LMFAO
Candace Owens would wipe him out with her mouth taped over.
He's too much of a Social Justice Baby. He would never do that.
“Hating people because of their color is wrong. And it doesn't matter which color does the hating. It's just plain wrong”.
Muhammad Ali💪
nuitNo.6 I’m not trying to step in on you, I’m just asking. How does being against racism make someone bigoted?
There is racial equity we’re talking about here. Not feelings! Educate yourself and watch this video again.
@nuitNo.6 You're aware that George Orwell was an anarcho-communist who observed and fought in the Spanish Civil War for anarcho-communism, right? Because using the language from 1984 to criticize American "communists" for simply arguing that the policies that have produced inequality along racial lines should be fixed to produce equality actually goes against the philosophy of the author whose work you're alluding to.
Gokart Mozart In some of Chomsky’s essays he seems to use “libertarian socialist” and “anarcho-communist” interchangeably, and I’d say Orwell is more attacking Stalinism than all definitions of socialism or communism. “Socialism in one country” is one of the central fallacies of Stalinism he attacks in Animal Farm and Catalonia.
@@druze3210 Because definition of being a bigot is one that is intolerant of others holding a different opinion. Bigotry is not always a negative thing
Coleman Hughes
Yes
Why would Kendi risk his lucrative career by having his arguments ripped apart in public
YES!!
So Coleman has become your flag and the answer to all things.
@@gaussminigun7095 Coleman has been ripped apart even more and so has all of Quilletes BS.
Bret Weinstein has invited Ibrahim X Kendi to his Dark Horse podcast....CRICKETS!
No surprise. I could literally out debate this man and I’m not an academic. He would get smoked so fast. And he knows it
This dude is a hardcore race obsessed person. He assumes every sociatal problem is a problem of race.
Why would he want to go on a silly pod cast of some nobody to debate him? What would be the point?
@@tboyer86 well if kendi had a leg to stand on (is that racist?), he could bolster his positions (is that racist?). If he cared to spread his doctrine, I’d expect that he’d want to entertain potential new listeners (is that racist?). But I don’t think his positions hold up. Because he’s a grifter (that must be racist?)
@@EbluestarE When is the last time you saw a college professor engage in a public live debate? That type of forum is theater, not an open exchange of ideas. When was the last time you watched a presidential debate and was convinced of anything. If people want to challenge his ideas do what he did...write a book or an article and submit it to peer review. Have you actually read his book btw?
As a person of color myself I don't shy away from calling out people like Kendi that simply need to look into a mirror to SEE a racist.
r/AsABlackMan
Kendi sees his face with feces floating in the toilet bowl
Clarification??
afreeman4302+Thank you!
Yes. I'm a pink-skinned heterosexual male with a bald head who is slightly browned from going to the tanning salon a couple of times a month. This guy is too hyper-focused on racism. He uses racism (or antiracism) as a panacea to solve just about every social issue. This is wokism in action and pseudo-philosophy.
"Not being a witch isn't good enough, now you have to point out the witches. If you don't, you're obviously a witch."
"Not accusing people of being witches isn't good enough, now you have to point out those who would accuse another of being a witch for being coveted or weird. If you don't, you have condemned those who are accused as much as if you accused them yourself."
Or in other words, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
Fixed that for you.
@@TheKarret
Aaaaand you’re defending the people who say silence is violence…
Bingo
@@jakemartinez6894 Silence allows the violence to continue. If you don't speak up and put a stop to it, the violence will keep happening. You're defending the bystander effect.
@@TheKarret
Glad to see you’re building schools right now instead of typ….
Tell me, how much does whatever you watch TH-cam with cost and why wasn’t the cost contributed to a worthy cause.
So called 'anti racism' seems to be about seeing race in everything. Rather than anti-racist, I would call it anti-liberal. I recommend James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose book Cynical Theories for people who want to understand how supposedly intelligent people can reach these kinds of absurd conclusions.
That is much more apt
"Anti-racism" is simply the new word for racism. Read 1984 and you'll under the term "Newspeak".
I see only green
“Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject.” - John Stuart Mill
Excellent reminder of Enlightenment thinking, The Kerret.
"Capitalism conquers poverty" -?? In our dreams, no examples of that yet, even in (non-preditory) 'Natural Capitalism'
Bret Weinstein would like to have Mr Kendi on his podcast, Mr Kendi you should take him up on his offer. We need a dialog between you two :)
Why the heck would he want to go on some nobody's stupid podcast and debate him? What would be the point of that?
@@tboyer86 to learn and teach
@@MCRONE2 How would doing a live debate accomplish that purpose? Have you even read Dr. Kendi's book?
@@tboyer86 own it and read it. how would two people discussing issues cause them and others to learn something? it's simple....you learn when your beliefs are challenged. i'd like to listen to such a discussion. avoiding it is to just not want your beliefs challenged (and never learn anything)
He daren’t do it because the shallow circularity of his arguments would be exposed. That’s the kind of thing that could be exposed through dialogue by asking questions.
A living example that speaking and articulating BS with confidence doesn't mean you are right in ANY sense.
It's called sophistry and rhetoric.
It is definitely problematic on many levels. I think solid evidence exists for some sociological factors which have led to where certain people are today in the hierarchy of our world. It is much more complicated than what is being presented here though and the judgements hurled are a turn off to whatever truths they may express.
Your comment is certainly indicative of that.
I read his book. He reminds me of evangelicals who espouse original sin and alter definitions to justify his racism, prejudices, and low self esteem
YES!
@唐三藏 lol....oh please take them. We will praise you Noble Chinese as our heros. Please take them. Gods above. Please take them.
He's a sham. 100% sham.
@唐三藏 well, seeing as I have freinds and family of varying ethnicities, I would prefer they stay in my community, but I am allnfor segregationists leaving America. We have no need for the collectivists or zealots who care more about superficial identity than the individual.
I tried to read it....got 10 pages in and had to stop because of a horrible smell in my room. Then I realized it was coming from the book. Hateful, divisive philosophy disguising itself as truth. The man's a grifter. I mean literally. Check into his "Center for Anti-racisim" and try to follow the 40 million dollar money trail. There doesn't seem to be a trail!
“Men build too many walls and not enough bridges.”
― Joseph Fort Newton
Ever been taken advantage of. Walls help.
@@hermanspaerman3490 it is bcos your country is the land of the free... thus everyone can come in.. thus who come in you have no way to move them out.
@@melbourneopera we still have borders/walls rather then bridges..
Hating people because of their color is wrong. And it doesn't matter which color does the hating. It's just plain wrong.
@@okoverallknowledge564 it's almost like vigirously attacking someones past and removing historical figures, & attacking what amounts to iconic fiction might feel like a racist attack.
Why hasn’t this man debated anyone on these ideas? Why is everyone so convinced about this and letting it go unchallenged?
Have you done the research to prove that this idea of being antiracist has not been challenged?
Also if you have the gull to comment behind your keyboard, why not come out the closed door and challenge the various antiracism researchers, teachers, and trainers in a formal setting across the US.
When you do present your challenge, make sure it's recorded so we can all watch and learn.😉 Thanks in advance!😎
@@lilyzemengist8091 It's seems to me that in the politically charged climate that we now live in, if he were to do that he would most likely be attacked ad hominem for that. People, like you, would rather target him than his ideas, logic, or reason. The sarcasm and obvious vitriol in your reply epitomizes this. You cannot point to disparities between groups and claim racism, sexism, etc. Here's an example for you. According to the Roland Freyer study out of Harvard, police do not kill unarmed black people statistically more than they do white people. This is a multivariate study backed up by other independent studies looking at police departments all of the nation (researcher is black btw and expected a different outcome so no confirmation bias!). Yet, if I were to say this and challenge the current narrative that black people are being systematically targeted and killed by racist cops, then I would be attacked by a mob.
Coleman Hughes wrote counter arguments in his article “how to be an anti-intellectual”. But yeah, I agree. I’d love to see Kendi debate in real time because his arguments are riddled with logical fallacies.
Much of the tactics they utilize have a chilling effect on dialogue. Cancel culture seems to be a direct result of this ideology. In the universities many professors are quite aware of the consequences of criticizing this stuff. There is a guy called Benjamin Boyce who has a channel that documents how these ideas played out at Evergreen State College that is pretty interesting/disturbing. A professor was accused of being a racist, and a white supremacist, when he refused to comply to a request to all white people in the school to voluntarily absent themselves, on the grounds that the request was discriminatory. He was the only dissenting voice not because he was the only professor who disagreed but because he was the only one with the courage to face the mob.
@@elomnusk4015
@Elom Nusk
I have a few questions and a request.
1. Who ARE 'people like me'?
2. What do you mean by people like me? Please elaborate.
I distinctly said to challenge the IDEA.
3. Where is the cruelty in my comment?
4. How is the topic of antiracism political?
5. What 'mob' do you fear would attack you and in what way specifically?
6. My request: provide the link to the study you addressed in your comment. I request this because, if your comment is intended to teach or shed light on something specific that's being misrepresented then any and all who view it should be able to access your primary/secondary sources.
This man has never debated anyone about any of his ideas. How strong are those ideas?
Let's create a whole ideology via the appeal to emotion. Data does not matter for this appeal to emotion
Who cares? When was the last time you saw an academic do a live debate? You don't see Neil DeGrasse Tyson debating flat earthers. What would be the point in debating someone who isn't even a scholar in a live debate when the point of a debate isn't even to see who has superior research and logical discourse, but to see which one can win favor with a crowd of people who probably already have the mind made up. When was the last time you watched a Presidential debate and changed your mind on who you were going to vote for.
@@tboyer86, I never said Kendi would have to go up against a scholar who possessed superior research and logical discourse.
@@purdysanchez So what would be the point of doing a debate?
@@tboyer86 So his opinions can be rationalised. He is possessed by a chaotic, sporadic ideology that hasn’t been questioned at all. It’s like how lockdowns have bred these radical views from all sorts of people-when you remove discussion and discourse from people’s lives, it’s like taking the brakes off a car for their opinions.
@@WinningThisOne What evidence, study or research do you have to back up that claim? The idea that scholarly work isn't peered reviewed simply doesn't ring true to me. Having worked in academia I know how rigorous the writing and research process is. Kendi's most famous book "How to be an anti-racist", while not an academic, peer-reviewed book, is based on his second book "Stamped From the Beginning". This book was heavily peered reviewed. He published several articles before completing the book, all of which went through the peer review process. The book was then submitted to the editorial process, which is much more intense for academic books than it is for say a book of fiction. And he presented his findings and research at multiple research conferences where he receives feedback from his peers.
Also, the idea that Kendi doesn't engage in public debates because he is afraid to is nonsense. If anything, he doesn't do it because there really isn't any incentive to. College professors get paid to do two things: teach classes and write research papers/books. Their tenure is based on those two activities. What purpose does going on some podcast with a non-academic to be yelled at and condescended to serve? There's really no up side.
They think "If you refuse to admit you’re racist, that means you are both mentally and emotionally "fragile" , as well as racist. If you admit you’re racist, at least you aren’t "fragile". Admission of racism is clearly the "better" of the two options (for the ideology)". If you deny that you are a witch, then you are a witch. And if you do not deny it, then you are a witch for sure. It's a kangaroo court & a kakfkatrap.
Well said
The problem is, usually in these situations, people are talking about two different definitions of racism with each other.
Where one side is talking about systemic racism, which is a complex system based on centuries of inequality that influeces everybody on a subconscious level, the other side just hears "you are a person who intentionally insults and wants to hurt people who are not your skin color".
And this is simply not the same thing.
Admitting you have grown up in a society with systemic racism at its backbone is the first step to healing long-ingrained injustice and inequality, it doesn't mean you are part of the KKK.
Exactly this.
I think you're missing the point, Jose. The point isn't defining you as a racist. The point is defining our society as fraught with racist systems--not the sort of systems a single racist person perpetuates, but that we all allow to exist via apathy. Listen to him carefully, and you'll recognize that he calls out every group in America, including minorities that bear the brunt of racist systems, for engaging in racist thinking. Who cares who is or isn't a racist? What matters is that everyone should be treated equally, and our society clearly doesn't do that at large.
Think of it this way. A building is smouldering. A businessman stands outside a building, and there's smoke coming out of one of the windows. A resident comes up to him and says, "This could turn into a bad fire--come up to that room with me and let's try to put it out." The businessman says, "I didn't start that fire, and I sure as heck aren't responsible for it. Is this my neighborhood? Let a firemen come and put it out." We cannot blame the man for being an arsonist. But would we admire this man? No--as the building burns down, we'd condemn him for being a bystander.
The same thing goes with racism in America. We may not be "racists," by the KKK definition of the term. But by not taking action, we have failed to oppose the racism. And so racism lingers. Kendi asks us to stop letting racism be someone else's problem. That's the only way our children's children won't have to grapple with the same iniquity.
@@growthought8670 I think he gets it and it gives me hope that some people see this for the mind parasite that it is.
Pure sophistry, he's arguing that a human being's default state is racist and the only away to be not racist is to be "antiracist". The argument is constructed to compel a person to want to embrace this so called "antiracist" ideology and all the linguistic gymnastics that goes with it. What complete bullsh|t.
The idea of "There is 'not racist', just 'racist & anti-racist' " is a false dichotomy, like "You can't just 'not be a witch', you are either a witch or helping me burn witches". It's a manipulation tactic to push you to do what you don't want or aren't sure about.
You say what you want he speaks truth like it or not
Problem is, if you try to have an honest debate with them, they start using Post Modern double speak.
The skills they have are extensive, but only useful if you are trying to undermine society through hatred and lies. useless at everything else.
@@pamelafranklin3452he only speaks the truth to the truly delusional and weak minded.
@@oscargoldman85well said
Watch out when people try to implement sorting algorithms for determining whether you're "with" or "against". Especially when they are very eagerly redesigning the language according to their ideology.
Incredibly well spoken. Nailed it.
well said
@@Cosmic.Origin.exe. that
It could be a slippery slope, but really all that he's trying to get you to realize is that by not participating in breaking down racist structures, you're helping to perpetuate them. That is all. You can try to break down racism any way you like, but if you're not doing that, you're helping maintain it, and you're doing something racist.
Looks like Cosmic Origin decided to dip out on this comment/delete... So here's the repost: "dogchaser520 Right, just if your not a murderer/rapist, but you don't do anything to stop murder and rape, your therfore supporing murder and rape, and guilty of being a murder/ rapist. Makes total sense"
This is a fair point. But rape and murder are both active crimes. Racism is not even a _crime_. It's only passive. It's a behavior, not a crime. Don't think racism is criminal, or even necessarily evil. It's just not terribly useful. It's a mind-virus we're trying to work out, a product of a less-developed age. We'll get there; it's just going to take time and thought.
This faux intellectual has said this in his book How to be an Antiracist: 'The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination. The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.' Talk about an evil, toxic, prejudiced, racist mind.
What kind of discrimination is he advocating for?
Yes, he did say this. His point is: discriminate to produce equal outcomes (equity) and not equal opportunity (equality). This means providing more funding to traditionally underfunded schools, for instance. Schools are funded _totally_ unequally. Right now they are not remotely equal. It's pure evil. But people oppose equal school funding. He would go a step further after equal school funding and provide more funding to those areas who have more people who are part of groups that have had schools historically underfunded. Is this right? Well, I'm not sure. But it does make you think, and I like that. It demonstrates that right now, what we have is incredibly backwards and evil. We need to actually start getting pissed off about it. One reason Kendi is so popular is _because_ he says stuff like this, which actually gets people talking. We've become immune to these effects and just accept them as normal. They're not normal, they're not OK. We're not even giving equal opportunities, much less equal outcomes. Let's start with equality, at least?
@@dogchaser520 Every time, humanity has aspired to equality, it
has lead to death and misery. People are not equal, we are individuals
with each our own unique needs, wants talents and skills and trying to
pigeon hole people into some utopian vision of equality will never end
well.
Instead of concentrating on "equity", which is just a dumb idea
and a rebranding of equal outcome, try and concentrate on simply
increasing peoples opportunity and freedom to choose said opportunity.
@@emperorpicard4901 So ending slavery, ending feudalism and the concept of nobility, letting anyone other than White male landowners vote, equal rights for women and non-Whites ... those were all just "death and misery"? What you mean to say is clear: it led to annoyance and discomfort on the part of the privileged class. You happen to be part of the current privileged class, and that means that these changes _will_ be uncomfortable for you. But the reason we keep having this discussion is not because everything is wonderful now. We have these discussions because not only do we not have equality of outcome, but we also don't have equality of opportunity. For example, many inner-city schools in economically depressed areas are funded by property taxes in the area, and as a result rely on ragged 20-year-old textbooks and an underpaid and overworked staff. I agree that we should work to increase opportunity (including funding schools across the state level rather than county, district and so on), and if you want to work toward such projects, I applaud your efforts. That does not mean that relative equality of outcome _across averages_ is not a desirable goal. We don't all have to be the same and we don't all have to "win" at this cruel game called life in a neoliberal society, but we should still be working to correct historic inequality.
@@dogchaser520 Ending slavery, feudalism and nobility etc where not exercises in "equality" but simply a recognition of rights, there is a fundamental difference.
A recognition of rights is individualistic in nature, its a recognition that people can and should make their own choices and that if you wish someone to follow your ideals, you have to ask them, not force them.
A recognition of rights is the exact opposite of equality, or may I remind you that all slaves where equally enslaved. As soon as slavery was ended, these poor people started diversifying and perusing other ventures then the cotton fields.
"What you mean to say is clear" rather then making presumptions, try and work on understanding.
"it led to annoyance and discomfort on the part of the privileged class." Actually, it led to the exact opposite. It turns out that people are generally the most productive when they are free and have their rights respected. The whole of society benefited from having people rights respected.
"including funding schools across the state level rather than county, district and so on" If government run schooling has failed so far, why do you think that more of the same would succeed?
I give you an alternative solution, competing schools in a free market that will reduce costs and increase quality, and increase peoples opportunity and free their choices.
"and if you want to work toward such projects, I applaud your efforts." Trying to centrally plan projects never ends well. So no, I do not wish to work on such projects, because I do not have the arrogant presumption of knowing what people need and want.
"That does not mean that relative equality of outcome across averages is not a desirable goal." It is not a desirable goal, people are not averages, again people are individuals.
I give you a true story as an example, the air force once tried to save money by designing a pilot seat that could fit ever pilot (rather than having many different pilot seats for different pilot sizes), so they measured every pilot and came up with average measurements and designed a seat for such measurements. It turns out that the seat did not fit a single pilot, why?
Because people are not averages and come in all kinds of shapes and sizes.
Recognizing that is the first step to recognizing that chasing averages for people is just a dump idea, rather focus on increasing peoples productivity, simple help them become the best version of themselves that they can be, while recognizing that "best" is subjective.
And if you think about it, this is a rather healthy lessons we teach our children, saying to them "don't measure yourself against your classmate, don't worry about his achievement, but worry about your own, focus on your own improvement etc", so why would it be different in adulthood?
Did this guy actually say we're addicted to racism? When his entire career is about racism? Without it no one would know his name.
You sound stupid, like the slave owners who believed they were doing the slaves a favor by feeding and housing theme , without racism he’d have a different career.
@@mindisflowershop2017 LOL
Now THAT is an extremely low level IQ comment.
Also in speaking to Non Western peoples from China and India they said their culture was far more racist than America or Europe was. Kendi is an ignorant grifter. Propped up by morons. He is a weapon of mass distraction
@@mindisflowershop2017 no he wouldn't lol
@@mindisflowershop2017 the problem with people like you is you think your some hero or good person amd have to constantly validate that to yourself. While at the same time let the super powerful brainwash you into doing there bidding which will never benefit you. And you believe this as your new religion to the point of hopelessness and unwillingness to learn on your own. You could never have an intelligent conversation with anyone if you believe ibrim is anything but a race addicted racist idiot. Your 10000% part of what's wrong with the country. Change
As a minority myself, I've grown up in a community with little racism. I received more flack and teasing for growing up Mormon than for growing up Asian. So my experiential context and Dr. Kendi's are very different. I see race as "a" problem instead of "the" problem, if that makes sense. So, naturally, I disagree with him on various topics and issues and agree with him on others. I like his idea that a person's action or speech in a given moment can be racist without classifying the whole person as racist. I also agree that if a person makes a mistake, they should admit it, change, and become a better person. On the other hand, at least in this presentation, his arguments about economics and politics seem to overly simplify complex issues. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Dr. Kendi, and hopefully we can all continue to learn from each other from different sides of issues and find common ground.
Mormonism is racist ideology at its core....especially against African Americans. You grew up around Mormons dishonest about their beliefs.
@@seanchaney3086 lol no it’s not😂it a a dumb poorly thought out religion but it’s not racist at it’s core not at all racist
He is obsessed with race. It is very troubling to listen to him speak. I think he is still racist and is confused by his own racism about how to look at social problems and see the solution for problems that have nothing to do with race.
You are not the target of most racism. That is why it is "a" problem for you.
@@QuatMan wtf are you talking about? The worst systemic racism in America is against Asians. They are literally prevented from accessing college because they do too well.
38:14 There are "so many" other countries with models we could implement here? Be specific. Name one. Name something. Name anything that has some semblance of diversity in terms of race, ethnicity, class, etc. and what that country does. Give us something to work with, rather than this generalizing. This question was an opportunity to put real legs onto his theories. Just start with one example of a country with similar circumstances doing something that is transferrable here.
the world is racist.; In Cuba, Brasil, etc, people with darker skin are prejudiced against. This happens all over the world; religious differences, skin color, disabilities....people are so unloving, internally violent, and live in competition rather than cooperation out of a scarcity outlook, that racism is prevalent all over...wake up and smell the coffee Joe
He's a televangelist.
Not so much. He's known for his writing and not his appearances. Give the book a read. It holds a silver bullet for how we can get beyond cancel culture. Racism is a mind-virus. Treat those with it as sick, and seek to get rid of the virus. We don't execute people for the crime of having cancer, because they are a victim.
@@dogchaser520 Is that the same book in which he stated that _"Racism is incurable"_ in one chapter and in another chapter he talks about being cured of his racism by a close friend?
Are you talking about the same book where re recommends a *Racism Czar* to be appointed and granted the power to confiscate privet property...
*_Bruh.. They don't make crack cocaine strong enough for me to take this dude seriously._*
@@dogchaser520 This creepy sound so similar like the cult idea of "everyone is a sinner, except those who join my cult and do as I told them to do, without any question"
Did you know that this guy is writing propaganda for children? I thought TED wanted to be taken seriously.
Read the book. This is not the place to have a debate.
@@dogchaser520 Critical Theories is a convenient & demagogic identity politics backpedal, to have something to fall back on when they know they've lost, fallaciously attacking the speaker's inmutable characteristics, instead of making a real counterpoint to the argument. Because a smoker tells you that smoking is bad, the fact he's an smoker, doesn't make what he said any less true, the truth is the truth, no matter who speak it.
@@dogchaser520 so why is he making CHILDREN BOOK'S for 4 to 7 year's old saying children should admit if they are racist you fucking kidding me how is a little child racist wtf is this world. We come so far with racism to fall back in with these type of people who get praised we all bleed the same colour we are not at fault at the past to be judged now so why are children being brought in to this this guy is a race baiting for cash simple as that
Step 1: divide people into racial groups and generate further divide with an uncompromising ideology.
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Utopia.
No Utopia is out there. This divide will only lead to genocide.
It's basically Marxian. The Socialist Revolution occurs and then we get Utopia, magically. Marx never answered how.
People are already divided into racial groups. White people sometimes don't realize it because they are the ones who aren't oppressed. But minorities face the fact that they are treated differently all the time. Which doesn't mean all white people treat minorities differently. And sometimes the few minorities in power also support white people over minorities. The net effect is that nearly every minority experiences being shut out from opportunities due to the way they look.
@@ellafoster-molina2288 if you insist we will show you how it's done. IDK why you guys think you would last 2 days.
@@ellafoster-molina2288 'White people sometimes don't realize it because they are the ones who aren't oppressed.'
- non falsifiable statement
"But minorities face the fact that they are treated differently all the time."
- non falsifiable statement
"And sometimes the few minorities in power also support white people over minorities."
- non falsifiable statement
"The net effect is that nearly every minority experiences being shut out from opportunities due to the way they look."
- non falsifiable statement
The entire religion of interesctionality and critical race theory is built on non falsifiable statements.
"You can't just not be a witch, you have to help me burn witches."
@Benjamin, if only more people appreciated your great analogy and saw the divisive quasi-intellectualism that this guy and the wokists are trying to pull on humanity....
Perfect analogy.
Or perhaps "You can't just not burn accused witches yourself, you have to stop people from burning them."
People like this don’t want racism to end because then they will have nothing to peddle 😅
Antiracism: the effort to redefine what racism means so that the textbook methods of actual racism can be employed without judgement.
So basically anti racism is racism under a different label
@@secondheaven9545 Same as "nepotism" was rebranded as "net working" and "torture" as "enhanced interrogation techniques". The trick is the double speak.
I think you'll notice that Ibram isn't blinded by the idea of "nonwhite people can't be racist" - he believes they can be - even against white people.... so idk what redefining you're talking about. :Va
@@TheKarret Not really. He playing word games. But he really is a racist
that’s sick
It’s funny, I’m a Hispanic man but I don’t think of myself a Hispanic, I’m just a man. I have a different culture than others which I both love and find annoying. I also find that I both love and dislike other cultures, and frankly I won’t have anyone tell me what I can and can’t like. Ibram, you are a racist, you see the world by race. In your eyes I am only a “Hispanic “ man rather than just a man. You don’t see the content of my character sir.
I'm Croatian and you are right this guy is a racist. He makes money by selling books on division and does not really care about dividing this country and different groups. Hopefully people wise up and quit enriching people like him and not buy wha he is peddling.
Watch out, some white liberal will claim you're not a "real hispanic"
You’ve hit the nail on th he head. This is one of the craziest dammed ideas that a person can be reduced to their color or gender or sexual orientation! I mean Really?? I am female and white but don’t feel female & white. I just feel like me. In fact how can a person know what a particular attribute feels like unless they can be more than one person simultaneously? Human beings aren’t simple. From all my reading and study it appears that reductionist thinking leads to dictatorships, oppression and lots of bloodshed. No thanks. I like this imperfect Democracy.
@@heavyglamrocker1987 Exactly, if "people of color" try to argue against the left, they just say that they have been brainwashed and don't know what they are feeling, almost racist isn't it.
LMAO
Mmmmmmmmmm people are reacting to a lot of things Mr Kendi did not even say. He is not saying that all non-blacks are racist. Nor is he pushing a far-left anti-White agenda. Jeez. The point is we all need to do the hard work of confronting our own biases. And more specifically how policies create or help to maintain inequity.
Well, one of the problematic things he said was that a white person needs to acknowledge that their success may be due in part to the advantages of systemic racism and failing to acknowledge that makes you racist. The reason that is problematic is because there is no accurate way to even begin to determine which privileges contribute to a person's success. Yes, there is white privilege, but there is also the privilege of gender, nationality, religion, beauty, IQ, personality traits. There are so many factors involved in a person's success. But he is so passionately sure that it is white privilege specifically that makes a person successful. From a scientific perspective, it's just a crazy claim.
M B he admits he was wrong on this. He was young at the time and angry. He rejected those beliefs a long time ago
@@mbags2575 I also take issue with his proposed Department of Anti-racism which would apparently have authority to discipline officials who do not voluntary change their racist ideas and thoughts. I assume this means the dubious definition of racism Kendi and people like Di Angelo subscribe to.
FROM THE GUY WHO COULDN' DEFINE RACISM WHEN ASKED TO DO SO.
What I get from is discourse is basically that the definition of racism = well.. racist ideas... history... society. Victims. I haven't really studied history and I love to generalize.
It's good to see in the comment section that most people aren't buying what's being sold here.
This is a slippery slope , I support the fact that police brutality and systemic racism is terrible and I would express that opinion under any circumstances. But there are other battles to be had , that exist , so no , not being actively devoted to the cause doesnt mean you are racist . That's the kind of bluriness in your speech . It reminds me the bush speech "either you're with us or against us " the world isn't a duality it's complex .
However when you take a vocal stance about a current very real problem in the world instated into culture and society and still mention there are more important things out there then what are you doing for these other very important things besides just casually mentioning them to try to diminish the impact of this very important issue for many people? If you got a purpose focus on that instead of things you deem not so important?
Bad-guys from WW2.
Landing in Normandy = antifa.
Leader of army that Landed in Normandy = antifa
People destroying the statues of that leader = antiantifa? fa?
Is BLM "fa" because they smeared statue of Churchil?
No, no, no. For these people world isn't only black&white but there is only one thing you are allowed to care about.
Do you remember the word "tolerance" they yelled back in the days?
@@ileanamon3352 If I get into a debate with someone , I will support the movement , the harsh reality is that I haven't heard a single person say that what happened to that man that day wasn't utterly atrocious . We're dividing more than anything because now people who aren't actively supporting the movement are deemed racist . Because this has gone out of the actual state of fighting for human rights and equality no matter what "race" (I don't like that word ) and more into a social mouvement where white people try to prove how great they are , making this more about them in some cases then the actual mouvement . This entire mouvement as a whole is beneficial I think. But the deviances of fights for social justice in the modern age can be dangerous. If you don't agree with something related to the mouvement you can be deemed racist. Exactly like the at the end of ww2 when the population would go after anyone who had had vaguely had something to do with the Germans , even unfounded rumors were enough to get lynched or humiliated . Huge angry mobs are dangerous because of their lack of nuance.
🎯
There's no such thing as systematic racism, it doesn't even exist as a term in CRT. Do you mean systematic racism?
He provides a definition of racist as an adjective which I'm ok with ... 'racist is a descriptive term. It defines what a person is saying or doing at any given moment expressing racist ideas like black people are lazy.' That's fine. But I don't agree that you can then call up that person as a racist - using the noun as a sledgehammer. But that's what is happening. These aggressive, ambitious, thrusting people claiming the black community as their constituency lash out anyone not paying lip service to them, 'You are a racist.'
Racist the adjective is just like saying someone's rude or ill-mannered or ignorant, all far preferable terms. What we need to do is get the word racist, and all the professional charlatans who ply it, out of the whole discussion. Then the people left in the discussion can have a sensible conversation.
Next to the difference between not fascist and 'anti-fascist'.
Violet Fyxe Hating people because of their color is wrong. And it doesn't matter which color does the hating. It's just plain wrong.
Muhammad Ali. #Okoverallknowledge
Ok:overall Knowledge - Preaching to the choir while endorsing racism amongst your own kind is extremist Black Supremacist theology.
Ok:overall Knowledge 🤔💪🏿🖕
Metal Gear brother I have just mentioned a Muhammad Ali quote. I didn’t mean to hurt anybody. I’m wondering what made you say to that. Anyway have a good day. 😊😊
It's exactly the same. You can be "not fascist" but be ok with people being fascists, in which case you are supporting and allowing fascism, aka pro-fascist (despite not "identifying" as one yourself). Or then you can be against fascism, aka anti-fascist.
Hello, we are TED talks. We are the closest thing you can get to scientology without technically being a religion.
Yes, and there are more and more ideological activists preaching on TED which is turning it away from science and into soap box. Pity, TED was such a great idea.
Ha, true
Mao has entered the chat.
👉☭ 👉
This guy is the definition of "pseudo intellectual"
Egg-zolani… lmao. Reminds me of Rachel Dolezal’s self-imposed “Nikecchi Amare Diallo”.
hes just a pampered race hustler
This is the first time I've seen TED having a political agenda. The women interviewing him are expressing their agreement.
It’s not an agenda it’s the truth and racist people are the only ones upset about it.
They look as confused of every other person listening to this nonsensical assertion. This guy's a joke
I mean, TED has always had a political position/agenda (pro capitalist & liberal corporate elitism), it could just be that this video is different than their usual fare and so you're recognizing that politics are at play, when political assertions are always present.
"The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination."
-Dr. Ibram X Kendi
"Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past."
-Gerorge Orwell 1984
“Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject.” - John Stuart Mill
Both op and it's reply are top tier quotes
TRUTH
“Kendi beats up 65 strawmen in under one hour.”
All of those strawmen were racist.
This guy's arguments can't stand up to the scrutiny of other intellectual individuals who disagree with him.
That's why he consistently refuses to have open discussions with any of them because he fears that he will not be able to substantiate his arguments against tough criticism.
But you know, he has the chance to prove me wrong. Simply have those discussions.
If he believed so deeply in his ideals, then he should be MORE than willing, even eager, to defend them against any dissenting opinions.
Yet he won't and he can't.
Profiting and dividing while acting like some sort of savior .🤦🏼♂️
A timeshare salesman could learn a few tricks from Ibram.
He's a charlatan. It's awful.
@@nicolasdesautels2848 Changing his name from Henry to Ibram and the "African" hair extensions is cosplaying ( marketing) to the white, affluent NPR crowd.
I think these terms have to be applied to all people. Blacks have to be antiracist also.
Also , we need to differentiate between results based on skin color vs results based on culture. Example, does skin color or culture determine fatherlessness? Does this affect future success? Or does city living vs country living affect life choices .
I would like to comment on your example . Can you elaborate on why did you say that ?
Hating people because of their color is wrong. And it doesn't matter which color does the hating. It's just plain wrong.
Muhammad Ali. #Okoverallknowledge
Honest Person I disagree, anyone can be racist
@@Elizabeth.Holiday So young browns are forced to break the law against their will?
Ironically, it seems to me that if this becomes a cultural norm, the group defining racism is guilty of systemic racism.
All you have to know about Ibram Kendi is his assessment of the police officer that shot Ma’Khia Bryan. Supposedly in the 8 seconds from upon arriving at the scene till when Ma’Khia Bryan had a knife to another girl's throat the police officer should have de-escalated the situation, and the reason the police officer didn't is because "SYsTemIC RaCiSm"...
Kendi: "People can never be racist. Only ideas and actions are. The goal is to do and say fewer racist things over time."
Comments: **WHITE FRAGILITY INTENSIFIES**
The time has come to go back to the 60's. The revolutionary movement that toppled Jim Crow pushed back racism, strengthening the self-confidence of Blacks and the entire working class.
MLK JR was assassinated in 1968…
Which shows that the 60s, while historic, weren’t all that effective
Segregation is worse now than it was then
@@Charles.Wright You mean like during slavery that you could buy the father and perhaps allow him to come a few days a year to visit their children's? Yeah!
@@Charles.Wright You misspelled racism.
Bruh this guy sounds like a cult leader
He is a Marxist, which is a fancy cult for rich white people
He is actually a far cry character
well... he is
He absolutely is, look at the weirdos defending him in the comments. Completely checked out as far as critical thinking goes
These comments are a cesspool of people trying to justify racism through the most absurd mental gymnastics. How people with so much cognitive dissonance sleep at night is beyond me.
@Puck Shack Marxist Conflict Theory is specifically economic, related to the inherent divide between bourgeoisie and working classes. Professor Kendi is not discussing societal issues through that lense; but instead a more specific racial conflict theory. If you expect me or anyone to take your criticisms of Kendi's theories seriously, then I'd recommend being specific about what your criticisms are... which implies reading his material, something I doubt you've done. (Also, if you intend to draw parallels between the racial conflict theory as posed by Kendi to the Marxist conflict theory of ... well, Marx ... then I'd recommend reading Marx as well. Also something I doubt you've done.)
Playing the victim provides one with a very powerful position of privilege
A person with privilege has always hindered over the victims of oppression. Review your history
Yeah the accurate privilage is called: left wing.
@@amphibian6074 He's got more money than I do and is calling me more privileged? You're deluded.
@amphibian6074 good little sheep, keep bleeting
Maybe also make a video on the difference between being antiracist and being anti-white!
I don’t think we should allow people to redefine language at their will. People are trying to redefine the term “racism” so that it can be applied in a sweeping way across entire groups of people without regard to the actions of individuals in that group. This is incredibly divisive. This might help move some people to action but it is not going to help us build a better society together.
They've already redefined the word racism. You now need systemic power in order to be racist, in short black people can't be racist and it's moronic
@@ThisisKyle Even by that definition.. Blacks can be racist.. so it's even more idiotic.. OR alternatively PEOPLE can't be racist.. because racism via that interpretation is a systemic/power thing.. and people are not institutions..
@@ThisisKyle Some people trying to redefine the word. So far, people with certain ideologies only added a separate definition that they use with one another. The orignal definition of racism still stands, and will continue to as long as people are averse to the racist redefining of words.
@@ThisisKyle Given that black people have so much power that the largest media and social media platforms in the entire United States of America back them, it's arguable that the redefined racism is going to backfire, since the current paradigm grants all of the power to non-white people and the current social mores basically REQUIRE prejudice against white people
Words are redefined all the time, but it seems like people only seem to really get upset about that when the new definition doesn't fit their worldview.
When asked what it looks like to be in a place where WHO he is matters rather than WHAT he is, he immediately starts with, "As a black man..." and then lists ways he feels as a black man. Did you notice that?
Critical Theories is a convenient & demagogic identity politics backpedal, to have something to fall back on when they know they've lost, fallaciously attacking the speaker's inmutable characteristics, instead of making a real counterpoint to the argument. Because a smoker tells you that smoking is bad, the fact he's an smoker, doesn't make what he said any less true, the truth is the truth no matter, who speak it.
@@Jose04537 What?
His personality as a human being is 'black man'
When people point out that the woke come out with ideas so ironically racist their response is basically always something along the lines of the ends justify the means. Kendi literally says that the cure for the discrimination is discrimination. How do you even argue with somebody so detached from objective reality? When you point out that their whole premise is that racism is bad yet they want to purposely engage in it, they turn around and call you racist for having that thought. It's literally beyond belief that anybody takes these people seriously in any capacity.
I find it seriously racist to deem things racist without first examining them.
Certainly an illogical path to gain perspective….
Racism is illogical…
Yup…. It’s absolutely racist 🤔😂👍
@@PIFF50so you agree ibram is a racist? Hard to decipher that comment...
not racist: ignoring the color of one's skin
antiracist: base all decisions solely on the color of one's skin
Hmmm...
It's a simple mind and a weak character that blames the system for their own inadequacy.
It takes someone with mindfulness and compassion to stand up to an injustice that did not happen to you.
Anti-racism is looking at a situation and noticing if you got preferential treatment and then speaking out for the person who was unfairly treated.
It is about going about your life noticing and thinking about what others are going through and if something happens, even a small thing that could make someone’s day better you do it. Observe, think and then act based on fairness.
And it's a naive person that doesn't recognize the reality of systemic injustice
@@karamiciek7722 I agree entirely but the injustice has to be clear and real and not imaginary. You cannot decide based on back reasoning from unequal outcomes. That is terrible reasoning and will not only not help anyone but will make things much worse
@karamiciek7722 you are a loon if you cant see this guy as a scumbag race hustler
Welcome to the new dark ages..
2020: where we totally abandon all reason and logic. This rabbit hole is waaay deeper than anything bad in the past.
Things have been nuts since 2016 or earlier actually. From liberals and conservatives.
Age of identity. As the economic system breaks down and fails in all ways to correct itself, the world breaks down on identity lines.
@Anthony Joseph You are perpetuating the same identity nonsense. The point is identitarians on the right and left are the problem. Organizing people into identity groups and blaming them is sick right wing ideology.
@@discogodfather22 sick right wing ideology? Have you had your head buried in the sand these past few years? There is only one political party currently blaming an entire group of people for things they havent done in America. Stalin, Mao all did that as well. Hitler, too. Isnt national socialism technically left wing? Know what you're talking abt next time
Yah... the lack of cultural output from America and being overtaken by other countries like Korea was the clear indication that America was in the dark ages. Now it’s even more obvious with the rise of the cult of identity politics that the dark ages has been upon us for a long time.
I’ve seen him say in multiple talks that “there’s either something wrong with people OR there’s something wrong with power and policies” and I just feel like that is such a simplistic and juvenile outlook. Completely lacks nuance.
The point is that if you look at America, there are very clear racial disparities across almost every measurable axis. If you start with the assumption that there really isn't a difference across racial groups, that humans are essentially equal, then this will lead you towards the truth that certain policies in the USA have impacted different racial groups disproportionately. It is a simple fact of history that white people in the USA , in general, have long had access to more resources and sources of wealth generation that have non-white people as a direct result of power, law, and policy. When those laws and policies changed and slowly became more equal (extremely recently historically speaking, after over 100 years of blatantly racist policy) all that accumulated wealth and power did not just suddenly vanish. Furthermore, policies such as red-lining and disproportionate law-enforcement (particularly when it comes to drug offenses) have fed into that cycle of disparity. Is this enough nuance for you? Humans have individual agency, and we are also highly influenced by our environment and our access to resources. When policies and laws have limited certain groups access to resources and limited options, we see the racial disparities arise.
@@jamesn3122 true and the solution is to stop all those policies and we did, so mission accomplished. Systemic racist policies over.
I typically love TED, but that they featured this neo-racist really makes me question TED’s intellectual integrity.
Anti-racism uses the same exact philosophy as Racism.
Because ‘anti-racism’ is really just a euphemism for ‘guilty conscience racist’
And it will show the same disrespect for law, and use of force to dominate others, if allowed.
Same with antifa
I grew up thinking that racism was discriminating against another person because of their race, skin color, or even culture and ethnicity but I guess not anymore. I guess the true definition of racism is the act of not believing that everyone is racist and more specifically the act of disagreeing with the Kendi.
It is so sad that anyone would give this guy's distorted views any attention at all. He is delusional.
That dude in the middle is so comically racist that he basically spent this entire talk explaining how the whole world around him is racist and that he holds the fountain of knowledge on how to combat or fight against it.
Still, the woman on the left is pretty good looking.
It gave me chills when my girls(13 and 14 yo) started chanting "you should not be a racist, you should be an anti-racist!" So I asked what does it mean? they said they dont know. So I told them to forget about it and be nice to everyone no matter the color of their skin. They said okay! and went on their way. Indoctination is happening, guys. This is like a cult targeting mass population.
It's being perpetuated through crt in schools.
So I'm either racist or an anti-racist. There is no in between. The mental gymnastics he must have committed to in order to fill an entire book is astounding.
This is a man who has been left to stu in his own racism for years while people in academia have been afraid to tell him his ideas are insanely divisive snd straight up racist. Everything wrong with higher learning can be summed up in this video.
This comment section gives me hope , everyone needs to continue to resist this nonsense . Anti racism is in fact racism
@Adonis Johnson The guy giving the talk does not think white people should be allowed to adopt black kids.
@@funkydanieluk Adonis probably agrees with him.
@@funkydanieluk That's not what he said at all. He said that people can't use the fact that they adopted a Black child (or have Black friends) as "proof" that they won't do or say anything racist in the future. I've seen woke White liberals often be quite explicitly racist and not know it...
Seriously...
This stuff is a cancer that needs to be stamped out by reasonable people
@@dogchaser520yeah, HE IS ONE OF THOSE RACIST WOKE LIBERALS, cant you see that?
I feel like Kendi could actually have a worthwhile discussion with someone who was willing to engage critically with his arguments instead of simpering, wooden hosts like these who take whatever he says as gospel.
Could.
Who would dare do that in this age? To be called out as a racist for disagreeing with this pseudo intellectual hustler? The whole ideology here is manipulative and designed to shield Kendi from any rebuttal or skepticism. It’s 100% a hustle for him.
Lots of people would debate him tomorrow. Douglas Murray for one would. Surprise surprise Kendi and DeAngelo want no part of it.
He couldn't, and he Won't. He has refused to debate people he knows would rip his racist ideas to shreds. He is the classic definition of a race grifter.
They're terrified, and probably rightly so, of losing their jobs.
Racism is very literally believing that another race as a whole is lesser. If you don't believe that, you're not a racist. Plain and simple. You don't need all extra this mumbo jumbo.
The idea of "There is 'not racist', just 'racist & anti-racist' " is a false dichotomy, like "You can't just 'not be a witch', you are either a witch or helping me burn witches". It's a manipulation tactic to push you to do what you don't want or aren't sure about.
The idea of "There is 'not racist', just 'racist & anti-racist' " is a false dichotomy, like "You can't just 'not be a witch', you are either a witch or helping me burn witches". It's a manipulation tactic to push you to do what you don't want or aren't sure about.
Anti-racist - ‘I’m non-white and my life isn’t perfect. That must be because I’m oppressed
The heartbeat of racism is peanuts like this having a microphone.
Treat everyone equal.
In other words, if you disagree with me you are racist!!!
Brilliant😐
Institutional racism: Constitution of Liberia Article 27 b. "In order to preserve, foster and maintain the positive Liberian culture, values and character, only persons who are Negroes or of Negro descent shall qualify by birth or by naturalization to be citizens of Liberia"
Shhhhh.....u dont want to spoil their agenda.
I want to see this guy speak with someone who will push back. Are there any videos of him in discourse with an alternate view? This TED talk and many others with this guy are often one sided.
Search Brett Weinstein ( Darkhorse) on TH-cam. Prof Weinstein recently interviewed seven black intellectuals that would crush Ibram X Kendi in a debate of ideas. Mr. X talks/books and paid appearances are geared for a white, affluent audience and not the general public.
The Left will NEVER go up against someone smart (ie: conservative). They know they'll get torn to shreds in seconds.
@@sladegrey9272 left wing people do constantly debate people but you can’t change everyone so eventually u have to give up and stop trying to debate/educate people who r ignorant and not willing to change. put that energy into things or people who r willing to change.
For being an advocate of anti-racism, this cat Ibram X. Kendi is so damn racist and divisive. It's funny that he doesn't see it, but I do.
Oh ya? If you can see it so clearly, why didn't you provide an example of him being "so damn racist and divisive"? The only "funny" thing, is that you didn't do that.
@@davidantonacci9525 you just proved it.
"We need a more equitable society"
Expect literally no one is equal.
Well, equitability and equality are two different concepts...
@@will7133 explain how.
@@basquegrand8982 Equality is everyone gets the EXACT same treatment, regardless of circumstances. Equity is the idea that a person's circumstances should determine the response we give. Hth!
@@clhunt15 bullshit. Equity’s entire goal is equality. Peoples circumstances will never we equal because people aren’t equal. It’s an impossible goal.
@@basquegrand8982 That's why it's a goal or an ideal. Something we try for. Right now we don't try very much at all, though. Example: public schools are still mostly funded by property taxes, so the quality of education for kids has a lot to do with how rich or poor an area is. I'm not OK with that.
TED talks should have Thomas Sowell on!
So what you’re saying is Being more mindful of others is how you avoid racists ideas. I get it.
Hating people because of their color is wrong. And it doesn't matter which color does the hating. It's just plain wrong.
Muhammad Ali
Yes, roughly, that's what he's saying.
@@okoverallknowledge564 He doesn't hate White people. Is that what you're implying he's doing? He would agree with you/Ali.
The idea of "There is 'not racist', just 'racist & anti-racist' " is a false dichotomy, like "You can't just 'not be a witch', you are either a witch or helping me burn witches". It's a manipulation tactic to push you to do what you don't want or aren't sure about.
@@Jose04537 Correction, the dichotomy is it's helping to burn "witches" or stopping people from burning "witches".
"Anti-racist" is Orwellian doublespeak for anti-white, or as Kendi would say, anti-whiteness. Adding the ness makes the ignorance and hatred legitimate.
Calling someone a racist now is akin to having called someone a witch in the Middle Ages.
I've been looking everywhere for a debate or discussion between kendi and anyone who disagrees. I agree with some of what he's saying but his cowardice is a bit off-putting.
Until he deals with the legitimate criticism thrown at him I refuse to support him and his work.
Well said. Cheers from November 2021 as the dynamic has gotten worse
@@WinningThisOne Good attention to detail! When I say "attention to detail" though, it's more like an awareness, because you can typify the quality of linguistic tactics being used. "Dialectic" is an important term to know, because it contrasts with the concept of a "Debate" in the modern world. As soon as you understand that, and a "Steel Man" argument by comparison to a "Straw Man" argument, you'll practically hack into conversational dynamics for the rest of your life. Truthful articulation functions precisely the way Good Vs. Evil functions in our archetypal stories. I live in California, and I still feel a bit sad Mr. Elder didn't become our Governer. Highest regards
Thomas Sowell would wipe the floor with him and he’s in his 90’s. Kendi knows his platform is propaganda; he’ll never challenge anyone.
He wasted 30 million on 2 researches and has nothing to show for it.
Kendi comes across as believing what he's saying, but what he's saying is incredibly ignorant, unscientific, and hypocritical. "For minorities, don't take individual actions as indicative of the group - that's racist. But, believe me when I say that there is systemic and institutional racism.". If he believes that denial of being a racist is indicative of racism, he should speak to his own racism, wouldn't that be internally consistent with his beliefs? Either he admits being a racist, and should elaborate, or he denies being a racist, thereby making him a racist, and he should then explain himself, no?
That's a whole lot of BS.
You’re late for your rally.
@@mindisflowershop2017 I wish I could to go to one of those rallies, it looks interesting. Better that than wallow in guilt or feeling oppressed all the time. Life on your side must be miserable.
This guys definition of racism is and I quote "racist policies that result in racist inequity based on racist ideas." So since he can't even come up with a coherent definition of what racism is he's objectively unqualified to speak on the subject. You cannot define a word with the same word you're attempting to define unless you're 5 or a liar.
No one would claim that mainland Chinese, Ashkenazi Jews, northern Indians, Ebo Nigerians, and Japanese (Americans) are outperforming white, African American, and Hispanic Americans in education and income, significantly, because our society is institutionally benefited to slant towards those minority groups. Why then are the plight and disparities of certain ethnic groups, in the US considered the sole responsibility of other outgroups? Absurd. Achievement not "privilege".
Take Native Americans, who have been receiving their so called "reparations" for decades and are the poorest ethnic group in the US. What is the net result of reparations and affirmative action, historically, for those people being "helped"? This man is just another race hustler and so called intellectual.
Poverty makes covid more deadly. Our diet and lifestyle make us more vulnerable to covid. We are physiologically the same.
Kimberyote3 it helps if you know what “physiologically the same” means. One race - human.
It's a wonderful interview technique not to challenge the interviewee. I'm sure if Thomas Sowell, who uses more of his brain when asleep, was being interviewed... they would treat him with kid gloves...
Don't listen to this evil. If you want to hear intelligent thought lookup Shelby Steele and Thomas Sowell.
HAHAHA now those guys are evil
@Puck Shack LOL Marx was an intellectual, something you clearly do not understand.
"We are raising whole generations who regard facts as more or less optional and they are being taught that it is important to have views and they are not being taught that it is important to know what you are talking about. It is important to hear the opposite view point and more important to learn how to distinguish why view point A and view point B are different and which view point has the most evidence or logic behind it. They disregard that, they hear something and they get some rhetoric and run with it...Get some facts first, know what you are talking about, before you start spouting out this kind of stuff."
- Thomas Sowell
@@activistarts7722 'HAHAHA now deys be ebils!!'
that's you lol!!
I have no idea why people give it a platform. it's ugly racism that sows division and hatred. who would want that?
The most pressing topic in this is how much the woman on the left blinked
Mr. Kendi is a racist himself, he values people based on the colour of their skin instead of the content of their character. Thank you for setting back race-equality back 5 decades, and at the same time dividing the general public (people, of all colours) in a time where they should stand together. But I don't think he really cares and that his books sell well this way.
For all people who aspire to become a scientist/ academic. Always try to keep a presupposition and believe-bias out of your studies and research. Mr Kendi is a perfect example of what happens when you start every new topic of research and study biased, thinking you already know the answer, and try to support the answer with your research / studies. Then everything can be lead back to your answer (in his case: racism), it is just laughable this man is considered an intellectual by some people.
Why does it have to be "Racism" all the time when we talked about a criminal here? You black people should have listenede to Chris Rock more.
which criminal are you referring to?
If you mean George Floyd ... you are missing the point.
Sorry.. let me rephrase: We, people of color, should have listened to Chris Rock more.
It is not racism all the time when we talk about criminals. I think you are totally missing the point of this issue. And if you really want to talk about the relationship between criminals and racism: what percentage of white criminals have been shot by the police and what is this percentage regarding POC? Even when the person next to a police officer is a criminal, he has no right to shoot him (and KILL him) unless the situation is very evidently threatening. If police officers can do whatever they want to criminals, then what is the purpose of justice, of law?
My football team has a beautiful structure of brotherhood. This goes against everything we believe.
THANK YOU.
I'm currently reading STAMPED FROM THE BEGINNING so I decided to see if there were any videos with Prof. Kendi. He's brilliant. I wish I could say I'm shocked by all the hate in the comments section, but I'm not.
I’m not racist, I have four black tires and a colored tv
In all seriousness, to sound like a boomer, you should always treat people with respect regardless of skin color
But let’s face it, we’re all not equal or all the same … Africans built Africa, whites built Europe, Asians built Asia… our cultures are different in their own rite and that’s ok. And it’s ok to be “racist” to be uneasy when you’re a minority around a group of large peope (ie a white person in a black neighborhood and vice versa a black person in a white area) it’s a survival trait, it’s a gut feeling to keep your head on a swivel.
This guys BS is left wing garbage, if he’s unhappy he should take Louis Farrakhans route and wish to separate peacefully
Oh… and he’s saying latinx… 😒
I don't trust anyone who only appears on media that is favorable to their message
It’s so hard to watch this, yet it’s incredibly important to understand those with which you completely disagree. Remember folks, there are ONLY two types of people. Racists and Anti-Racists. If you’re not his definition of anti-racist, guess what, you’re racist. Read Thomas Sowell if you want to actually understand race and the world. Not this racist.
“Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject.” - John Stuart Mill
When asked about specific countries America could emulate, he never stated a specific country or policy America could emulate. He then encouraged everyone to ask specific questions about policies and actions, when he was just asked to give specifics but didn’t. On that same question he said “There are countries with more people than us but less people in prison.” Avoids specifics. There are only 2 countries with a higher population: China and India. China is a communist dictatorship that swiftly silences dissent and India’s median household income is less than $2000 a year while still hosting some unbelievably rich billionaires. If there’s anyone we should take lessons from, it’s not China or India.
China just doesn't call it prison
'There are countries with more people than us but less people in prison.”
Those countries don't have 13% of their population with a 73% out of wedlock birthrate.
There's no perfect country. The US shouldn't be emulating any other country. It's its own place.
those are answers that frauds give ...he's a fraud
it’s sad that racism is spread across the globe. Yet, you trying to find an idea that you don’t agree with IS BECAUSE JUST LIKE THE RESIDENT WHO TRIED TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT AND END DEMOCRACY, YOU’RE A RACIST! GET WITH IT
I hear he’s up for grifty of the year
“After suddenly laying off over half his employees last week and with his center producing almost nothing since its founding,” writes David Decosimo in the Wall Street Journal, “Mr. Kendi is now facing an investigation and harsh criticism from numerous colleagues complaining of financial mismanagement, dysfunctional leadership, and failure to honor obligations attached to its millions in grant money.”
I'm loving all these past TED talks that turn out to be hosted by criminals.
This is ridiculous.
**continues to hold on to racism**
@@Andy329 The people who hate this garbage certainly aren't. Those teaching this woke garbage are doing their very best to resuscitate racism, which had been in it's death throes as recent as 5 years ago now.
@@sirellyn Literally every finding of the social sciences refutes the idea that racism has died.
Among a GIANT POOL of studies tackling racial-disparity-phenomena from: medical outcomes, to arrest rates, to sentencing outcomes, to housing values, to rates of pollution in comunities, is the cited study below.
As recently as 2017 there was a major study which revealed, through experimental means, that racial disparities in hiring are still extremely socially prevalent 45 years after the Equal Employment Opportunity Act was ratified.
Racial double standards and applicant selection.
Authors:
Doerer, Sharon Clemons1
Jr.Webster, Murray2 mawebste@uncc.edu
Walker, Lisa Slattery2
@@solidaritytime3650 I'll take a look, but before I do let me just make sure:
- None of these scientists espouse critical theory, or have used critical theory claims to base work. (Which are on their own 100% unscientific)
- This is a comparative study, rather than showing any slightest trace of racism exists... (This is NEVER a test for the presence of something, as in any scientifically "clean" room you'll find dirt still.)
...it shows a COMPARATIVE of known discrimination based on skin color and it's effects vs a similar test in most other countries in the world, and over at least the last 30 years.
- Their sample size is at least in the 10's of thousands in a diverse area.
- The study is falsifiable.
Assure me it doesn't breech these 4 very basic tenants, and I'm happy to read it.
Otherwise I'll assume it's in the same stack as feminist glacial theory paper stacks.