@user-vx7vi3vq1c but they do NOT own the water. I was fishing near but not ON a private dock. I had man call police. Saying it all belonged to him. And guess what. All the home owners claim that their rights include the water out to 50 ft. Lol
Putting up a fraudulent sign on a beach should be illegal and punishable. You should not just be able to claim public land is yours without suffering any consequences
@@NomenClature-o8severyone is a tenant, federal government owns all land as they used it for collateral to the IMF and the federal government didn’t buy the land they stole it by force so technally they don’t own anything just living on stolen property…
ALL beaches need to be public! The homeowners don't own the beach. When storms ruin beaches it's not the homeowners that pay for the repairs it's our tax dollars.
She gets the view, the sea air, doesn’t have to worry about parking, can go to the bathroom, can have a snack, doesn’t not have carry chairs and supplies from the car to the beach. Pretty damn good deal. It’s still burning her up that she doesn’t own Pacific Ocean.
If you're directly behind their house, then it's their backyard. You wouldn't like it either if someone was behind your house, whether it was the beach, mountains or a river. However, if you move away from directly behind the house, there wouldn't be an issue.
Uhmm, Hawaii is a STATE. Why would their law vary from any other state ? In Florida we can drive on roads and go to libraries. Bet you can’t do that in Hawaii can you?!?!? See how stupid your comment is?
Yeah but the locals in Hawaii are actually respectful unlike most of the visitors here in California. A lot of visitors here in SoCal trash our beaches, bring loud speakers, etc.
Thats not entitlement. Thats "im tired of people littering and destroying a multi million dollar property i paid for" its no different than if someone were to come into your yard and leave a bunch of shit everywhere.
@@PCRyderSmoke more crack fool. We are tired of you pompous rich folk. Wonder how most of these rich people made their ill gotten gains. Definitely not from working harder than us little people, they just figured out how to game the system, break laws, and take advantage of others, that’s the recipe for success.
@@Max4Z Doesn't matter. Its still trespassing. She can be mad. And the news article clearly articulates that tourists are trashing laguna beach. So yeah id say we can use our brains and say littering is a part of it.
Hawaiian folks woulda beat a brother down telling them he owned a beach. NO ONE should own beach access. You buy a house near it, you get easier access, that's it. You want your own beach, go buy an island somewhere.
Lol, despite the dispute i'd say the people able to go to and enjoy the beach AND the ones living on the coastline are winning. Hell, even the homeless are winning to a degree. They could be homeless in a cold, less friendly, landlocked state.
@@andreabradley5837 Not first world problems. Problems around the world where rich people want to own the beach and leave the poor people with nothing.
It’s not the fact that the house was built close to the beach , it’s THE JERK who lives inside the house that doesn’t know how to handle living close to the beach
Just a heads up, it’s the few bone heads that give beach homeowners a bad name. Most are actually not jerks. I know this as someone who frequents the beaches for 60 years.
I’ve never seen an endangered beached whale rope itself off before..I live close by, everyone check their mailbox for my huge beach party invite in front of her house.
@@ChavezDIY😂😂 I had to see the Google Map listing for myself... Can't wait to move back to California in September. I know the very first place that I will be visiting 🎉
This has been going on for literally decades. How these false claims to private beach ownership and access have been allowed to go on this long is ridiculous.
@@LadyMavenum, no those people have tax attorneys and have made numerous contributions to politicians to provide loopholes so their tax burdens are less than those of the average taxpayer.
@@jld593Maybe for income tax, but property tax is a hard one to skirt around. Hard to fudge the numbers to the assessor when they can see you live on beachfront property.
@@jld593Maybe for income tax, but property tax is a hard one to skirt around. Hard to fudge the numbers to the assessor when they can see you live on beachfront property.
Having a bunch of people litter on your property and being irritated about it is not entitlement. Imagine if people wandered onto your yard and left a bunch of shit everywhere. Except you paid millions of dollars for that yard.
@@PCRyder I agree with your sentiment, except that a persons home is that , whether a castle or a cottage. Respect others property be it humble or fancy.
It’s not her property pcryder they made her take the ropes down. You must be just as entitled as her. Your family trust is visible through your comments
@@Plutogalaxy OK, I will correct my statement but there have been cases where home owners and HOAs have blocked off access to beach and loss. I wasn't gaslighting and it is illegal to block access to beaches in California per the California Coastal Act.
My family immigrated from California to the USA back in the 90’s and even I know that all beaches in California are public access. We even used to go to Laguna Beach specifically all the time. Absolutely there are private houses everywhere there. I’ve seen Laguna Beach in recent times, she should be grateful those people weren’t homeless and OD’ing.
Pissing people off in LA and then running back inside your house is not a good idea. They totally know where you live and one day you will piss off the wrong person or people.
@@1911Earthling I agree with that. The surfers and the fishermen need access as well as beach goers. What I hate about people is they leave behind trash.
People that act in that manner should be able to be charged with harassment. I remember a person saying I couldn’t park on a street in front of his house because it was private even though there were public parking signs
That crazy woman is dead wrong. She may not like it, but the public has access to the beach. We all own a piece of the ocean, and these wealthy scumbags need to be taught a lesson.
@@ingridfitz5677 There is public access to the beach and the home owner in that area actually owns the beach 10 feet above mean high tide. READ the law.
@@NomenClature-o8syou clearly haven’t read it either , you must be one of the sunburnt cockroaches in the video 😂 the homeowner’s property line STOPS at the high tide line, everything below it is PUBLIC.
@@jaAYnuMbeR5 and people pay for their private property. Maybe a few dozen people should just walk across your front yard everyday, set up and picnic and leave their trash on your lawn?
If I had it my way, there would not be ANY houses on the coastlines in America. I would push the public access to 1/2 a mile or more, with no houses within this boundary.
@@fastesteddiealive 100% wrong. The law is very clear. The land owner’s property (in that jurisdiction) is 10 feet above the mean high tide. Do some actual research before writing whatever sounds good inside your head.
No, she needs a month in jail. She's been doing it over and over according to many posters. It also wasn't the first time she was warned by law enforcement. They just need to charge her and it will stop.
Mason cops will drag their feet, and if it ever goes to court the Mason judge will settle for a three digit fine and no recorded conviction. Money protects money. Power protects power.
@@chadkelham5034 In ten years, laws will quietly be passed with bi-partisan support that allow beaches to become private, and nobody will ever remember having 'voted for that'. It's not left vs right. It's the mega rich vs everyone else. They just give us left vs right so we chase each other's tail while they steal everything.
When someone trespasses on your property you will not touch them? Despite what you think, they bought the property with the shoreline and California Coastal act is for new construction and doesn't apply to these owners.
@@Xxxxxx2x Wrong, go look at a GIS map of Laguna Beach. It’s shows the property lines for each house. It clearly shows that many homeowners do own a portion of the beach.
Laguna beach has become the new hotspot because nobody wants to go to Santa Monica or Long Beach or Venice. If you go to Venice you get sexually assaulted, if you go to Santa Monica you get harassed by homeless, if you go to Long Beach you step on used drug needles. So now everyone and their cousin is going to Laguna and setting up tents and leaving dirty diapers and corona bottles when they leave -the people who live there are fed up.
@paulballard304 it's all about property lines. Property lines never extend into the beach. It is like a street. I don't go roping a street up just because the cars are too loud.
@@paulballard304 yes. All properties have lines around it. However, they don't extend into the beach here in California because by law the beach can't be owned. A property survey will mark the border lines for owners and these surveys are always done before a home is bought. This means that home owners know where their property ends.
The reason why they spend multi million dollars for those houses out there is because they want to get away from the mess they have created from the inner city
Update on the laguna beach homeowner: She has a history of complaints to LBPD regarding trespassing, which were deemed illegitimate, she now has been given a court date for her efforts to stop beach goers from entering what she deems “her property”. The California Coastal Commission, which has quasi-judicial control of the land and public access along the state’s coast line is involved and currently investigating the matter.
User nobody is on her property that’s the whole point. I’m pretty sure u are the lady. They made her take ropes down and told her she’s a bi$ch just like you are. Your trust fund days will run out eventually
This has been going on for decades in CA. I would never damage anyone’s property, but my friends may have sent some very expensive and inconvenient messages to beach front homeowners in the 80’s. Good times 👍
Things fueling this: 1. California when you count illegals California population grew by 10+ million in the last 2 decades. Virtually everyone lives near the coast. So that 10 million extra beach goers for the same beach length. 2. Massive beach erosion. There are beaches where in 2000 where water was 1000+ feet from the nearest home. Today in high tide water is less than 100 feet to that same home. 3. The decline of civil behavior in the last decade. You can go to plenty of eating establishments in California that had booths a decade ago that are now only take out only because of the decline if basic civil behavior.
All could be avoided if everyone was respectful to each other. Visitors need to pick up their trash, stay off the property that is private, use good judgment during their visit. I'm sure the residents are fed up with those who behave badly during their time at the beach. The residents can't think that the beach is all theirs. If there are problems, try to work it out, everyone should know the laws that pertain there, and follow them. Beaches are places to relax and chill
I live in Oregon, so am more familiar with our beaches. Our coast is very rugged, some small coves are impossible to access without crossing private property, even on the lowest tide. And our population numbers are very low, in comparison to southern California. In Portland we have a huge problem with Fentanyl addiction, and homeless living on the streets. I have seen a lot of trash, and drug consumption here. So, yeah sometimes individuals behave in ways that are objectionable and offensive, in public spaces. I can imagine after a few bad experiences, the "Karen" in this story just lost it. Or maybe she us just an entitled rich *itch, I don't know.
@@docwatson1134 She is actually in some trouble with the California Costal Commision. She was sent a letter and the fine could be $11,000 a day if she does not comply, by removing the roped off area. I felt sorry for the little boy in the video. Traumatized by a raging person, when he was just having time with his family at the beach. I have been there a few times, it was a lovely place, but it appears that a lot more people are going there now, which might instigate more problems.
We homeowners are fed up! This news are not showing the truth about our situation, people come to the beach to pollute, Make noise, get drunk, destroy things and who knows what else, until the police arrives the disaster already happened! And there's no consequences at all!
Why start a fight on the beach. If you think you own the land do a proper survey and put up a fence along your property line. If it isn't yours then stop arguing.
I totally agree. The beaches are public and visitors are welcomed but they still have that responsibility of taking their trash with them instead of leaving it behind.
When you say “be respectful” I assume you’re talking about towards Mother Earth and not the home owners right?😂😂😂 …. But seriously here in the state of Washington much of the waterfront is private do to an old and illegitimate law that was written to help early oyster farmers so god bless CA for getting that part right
Agreed. I stand behind you on this. As long as we hold them accountable. There has to be some type of balance, like if a resort decides to put umbrellas and chairs on the beach it can’t be restricted to hotel guests only. I do like the idea the hotel would keep the part that they’re caretaking clean. I just came back from the beach, it was filthy. I’ve never seen Malibu that disgusting. Luckily I had taken a trash bag with me, I gathered whatever pieces of trash I could. The items I collected seemed to be lost items. Things being taken out of people pockets when they’re in the waves, also plastic fast food items.
If it were on his property, he's right...he can't legally be filmed without his permission. However, that's the story isn't it? Is it his property? My guess is no...
If you're directly behind their house, then it's their backyard. You wouldn't like it either if someone was behind your house, whether it was the beach, mountains or a river. However, if you move away from directly behind the house, there wouldn't be an issue.
For the couple that was commenting on how great it was and it was dog friendly, the rules printed on the sign next to that one public access point to the beach clearly says no dogs allowed. That's a rule I personally would expect to see for public beaches. They are obviously in violation.
Some people think we're not animals. LMAO. Here, you have territorial humans willing to use violence for territory. And they say the animals were put here for us. Such BS.
That’s easy to say when you don’t own it hahaha I think those folks are stressed out of their minds trying to hold on to properties and a lifestyle that is becoming more and more expensive by the day. Idk give grace because we don’t know what everyone is going through… But also don’t walk up on me at the beach either 😂😅
😅. This is California. In most situations you can't even get a cop to show up unless there's blood involved. The answer to your question is no. Now someone with a cell phone could actually look up the statute and show it to the homeowner but then there would be a dispute about where the mean high tide line is. It's not the simple issue that you think it is because all animals are territorial.
The simplest thing to do would be to have a clear fence that delineates your property, so that people know where it starts and where they can't walk. Since it is related to high tide, there should be a marking of some sort. How can tourists know where the limits of the property are if not indicated?
"We own the beach because we are rich now get off!" so annoying but what is also annoying is visitors that go to the beach and don't pick up their trash!
@@adolfocamblor9295 lol a Californian said it, not me but I’m just taking her word- how can Californians watch folks suffering on a sidewalk for a decade and not flinch is beyond me.
@@adolfocamblor9295 you’re getting upset with me over something I didn’t even say… Yes we do have homeless but we have several shelters in the area so they don’t stay on the street for long.
It’s sad when these people buy homes by the beach in California and assume the beach is theirs. They need to realize the beach has always been for everyone as we Californians share the beach.
The beaches are public but there shouldn’t be forced public access either. I’ve seen cases where the city uses convoluted justifications to force private land to create an access for public. And on the other side of it, there are beach goers that are rude, loud, and trash these beaches. That increases the tension. There’s a balance.
Well that IS a generalization. Am not a rich person, but I have had periods in my life where I have been rich and Ive always been to earth cuz am punk AF and I used to know a weed grower that made millions and he was never entitled,as a matter of fact when he quit he gave all the rest of the plants, buds and colas to friend afflicted with cancer. I think social class generalizations are completely false because social class define being conscious or not. That is a Marxist myth. The glorious working classes supported fascism in the 30ties. Consciousness is defined by individualist affirmation of the self & Ego and the rejection of all domination and control of individual @autonomy.
It’s not her property. Putting up something permanent would get her dragged into court. Now some rich people are willing to spend the money on lawyers to keep their illegal structures up.
Guess I'll bring the boys out to Lechuza instead of Leo, looks killer! Thank you Fox, Karim and ESPECIALLY the local home owners for the publicity, see you soon.
Feel free to leave the country. Land belongs to those who hold it. By your logic, every American is gross including your own founding . Use your head, don't be a Californian.
Purchasing a home by the beach and thinking you own the beach is insaaaaaane!
Here in Ohio, you CANNOT own property any closer than within 3 feet of a public waterway.
@@unionrdr That’s not true at all. People own lakefront properties right down to the lake.
The insanity is California.
@user-vx7vi3vq1c but they do NOT own the water. I was fishing near but not ON a private dock. I had man call police. Saying it all belonged to him.
And guess what. All the home owners claim that their rights include the water out to 50 ft. Lol
@@donovanbryan5000 I never wrote they owned the water.
Putting up a fraudulent sign on a beach should be illegal and punishable. You should not just be able to claim public land is yours without suffering any consequences
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅going there now to clean my azz h ole.🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🍲🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓
FUCK YEAH!
Lock everybody up!
@@guybeingaguyman but they should lock real criminals up
People are sick of their towns being destroyed by dirty diapers and corona bottles.
If you visit somewhere, take your trash with you.
Rich people think they own the world.
Yes they do & there nothing but lowlife gutter Trash .
They kinda do..
No there not better nothing than anyone else is there nothing but
Trash & garbage.
@@NomenClature-o8severyone is a tenant, federal government owns all land as they used it for collateral to the IMF and the federal government didn’t buy the land they stole it by force so technally they don’t own anything just living on stolen property…
They do
The *Laguna Beach* woman had two park rangers show up at her door & fined her for littering! 😂 *Karen Karma*
is that really true?
@@cbus12ll27 yah. KTLA news station reported on it. Channel 5. It’s on their TH-cam
I would sure hope so
ALL beaches need to be public! The homeowners don't own the beach. When storms ruin beaches it's not the homeowners that pay for the repairs it's our tax dollars.
They already are thats the point. These residents have no legal standing.
The State owns all the shoreline in California you only get the illusion of owning beachfront property.
Actually, the homeowner owns the land they purchased in the back of their house to the ocean the beach
@@alanjordan1742 That is 100% not the case and you could easily look it up in the California Coastal Commission site
California Coastal Act of 1976 decrees all coastline in California is open to the public
She gets the view, the sea air, doesn’t have to worry about parking, can go to the bathroom, can have a snack, doesn’t not have carry chairs and supplies from the car to the beach. Pretty damn good deal. It’s still burning her up that she doesn’t own Pacific Ocean.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
She should spend more time walking on that beach instead of talking…………………
They pay a lot of money to live there.
If you're directly behind their house, then it's their backyard. You wouldn't like it either if someone was behind your house, whether it was the beach, mountains or a river. However, if you move away from directly behind the house, there wouldn't be an issue.
There is always one deeply antisocial person in every neighborhood it seems.
Hawaii does it right… All beaches are public, no private beaches. Tide line is irrelevant.
unless you're of the 1%
Uhmm, Hawaii is a STATE.
Why would their law vary from any other state ?
In Florida we can drive on roads and go to libraries.
Bet you can’t do that in Hawaii can you?!?!?
See how stupid your comment is?
Puerto Rico is the same! all beaches are public. Tideline doesnt matter.
Good for Hawaii. But you do know that CA is the same right?
Yeah but the locals in Hawaii are actually respectful unlike most of the visitors here in California. A lot of visitors here in SoCal trash our beaches, bring loud speakers, etc.
Time to fine these entitled residents.
Thats not entitlement. Thats "im tired of people littering and destroying a multi million dollar property i paid for" its no different than if someone were to come into your yard and leave a bunch of shit everywhere.
@@PCRyderSmoke more crack fool. We are tired of you pompous rich folk. Wonder how most of these rich people made their ill gotten gains. Definitely not from working harder than us little people, they just figured out how to game the system, break laws, and take advantage of others, that’s the recipe for success.
@@PCRyder 1. Not all of that was her property
2. We don’t know if the visitors there were littering or not
@@PCRyder
Blah blah, 😒
@@Max4Z Doesn't matter. Its still trespassing. She can be mad. And the news article clearly articulates that tourists are trashing laguna beach. So yeah id say we can use our brains and say littering is a part of it.
Hawaiian folks woulda beat a brother down telling them he owned a beach. NO ONE should own beach access. You buy a house near it, you get easier access, that's it. You want your own beach, go buy an island somewhere.
Thank you for your permission for allowing people to buy their homes
@@alanjordan1742 Found the peasant.
@@alanjordan1742 are you pleased with your sassy high school comment?
Epstein did that!
@@alanjordan1742 You are one whiny little loser. You're never going to own property anyways lol, what are you crying about?
If the homeless dont harrass you on the beach, the homeowners do. You cant win in California.
Damm…. this only happens in California?
and if they dont harass you, some half-wit, dim-wit, f*ck-wit will. Its the USA.
The homeowners created the homeless via NIMBYism
😩😩😩
Lol, despite the dispute i'd say the people able to go to and enjoy the beach AND the ones living on the coastline are winning.
Hell, even the homeless are winning to a degree. They could be homeless in a cold, less friendly, landlocked state.
Imagine living on the beach and being mad when people are on the beach. 🤦🏻♂️
😂😂😂smh
Because they want their own private beach. Doesn’t everyone?
Nimby
First world problems
@@andreabradley5837
Not first world problems. Problems around the world where rich people want to own the beach and leave the poor people with nothing.
These houses should have never been built so close to the beach.. for many reasons. I have no pity for these rich snobs.
It’s not the fact that the house was built close to the beach , it’s THE JERK who lives inside the house that doesn’t know how to handle living close to the beach
They weren't. Coastal erosion brought the beach close to the houses.
In 10 years those houses will be washed away.
@@dps6198coastal erosion only happens with fjord like environments, not a beach
Just a heads up, it’s the few bone heads that give beach homeowners a bad name. Most are actually not jerks. I know this as someone who frequents the beaches for 60 years.
How stupid to make such a blanket statement. They're not ALL like that. We live near CA beaches, and I speak from experience.
I’ve never seen an endangered beached whale rope itself off before..I live close by, everyone check their mailbox for my huge beach party invite in front of her house.
Bring a mini projector with Bluetooth, a big white sheet & then you play that video on loop where she can see/hear it. 😊
I will drive in from Tucson. 8-)
The location is listed as a landmark in Google Maps under "Karen's Private Beach"
🤣👍
@@ChavezDIY😂😂 I had to see the Google Map listing for myself... Can't wait to move back to California in September. I know the very first place that I will be visiting 🎉
Imagine spending millions on a beach house but zero dollars on a gym membership.
😂😂😂😂
Too much Bacon 😂😂😂
LMFAO!!!
She doesn't even swim
@@Vmaster005 never too much bacon just too little exercise, and they live on the beach lol
This has been going on for literally decades. How these false claims to private beach ownership and access have been allowed to go on this long is ridiculous.
People are super ignorant. That ain’t changing
They are not false claims
@@alanjordan1742 in a legal sense, they are. Maybe there’s some other sense I’m not aware of
Being a millionaire with a home on the beach gives SOME people grandiose ideas of the “private beach”.
There's always a new batch of entitled plutocrats moving in.
Miserable people who will cry when a storm washes away the sand , and the TAXPAYERS get stuck with the bill for replacing the beach,,,,
Um, those with homes on the beaches pay higher taxes than most. So, that's not quite an accurate statement.
@@LadyMavenum, no those people have tax attorneys and have made numerous contributions to politicians to provide loopholes so their tax burdens are less than those of the average taxpayer.
@@LadyMavenreally, so you pay more income tax if you have a home on the beach? I didn't see that on the irs form. They get federal funds.
@@jld593Maybe for income tax, but property tax is a hard one to skirt around. Hard to fudge the numbers to the assessor when they can see you live on beachfront property.
@@jld593Maybe for income tax, but property tax is a hard one to skirt around. Hard to fudge the numbers to the assessor when they can see you live on beachfront property.
Those rich people are so entitled.
Having a bunch of people litter on your property and being irritated about it is not entitlement. Imagine if people wandered onto your yard and left a bunch of shit everywhere. Except you paid millions of dollars for that yard.
@@PCRyder I agree with your sentiment, except that a persons home is that , whether a castle or a cottage. Respect others property be it humble or fancy.
@@PCRyder How do you know they were on her property?? The women was complaining about them being on the beach, not on her property.
@@mopes2713 BEcause if you listen closely it says "private property" She owns that stretch of beach.
It’s not her property pcryder they made her take the ropes down. You must be just as entitled as her. Your family trust is visible through your comments
She needs to sell her house if she doesn't want people on the sand.
She a renter
This is one reason Oregon's better. There are no private beaches, and you're not allowed to have a house on the beach. It's all public, wet or not.
There are no "private" beaches in CA either. All beaches are public. But rich people ignore the rules, and challenge them in courts.
There are no private beaches in California. They just can't draw a line in the sand and say mine.
@@Plutogalaxy OK, I will correct my statement but there have been cases where home owners and HOAs have blocked off access to beach and loss. I wasn't gaslighting and it is illegal to block access to beaches in California per the California Coastal Act.
@@elmono3939 Plenty of private beaches in California.
@@dohanddonuts5716 I read this and it is for new construction and not old construction or did I read it wrong?
My family immigrated from California to the USA back in the 90’s and even I know that all beaches in California are public access. We even used to go to Laguna Beach specifically all the time. Absolutely there are private houses everywhere there. I’ve seen Laguna Beach in recent times, she should be grateful those people weren’t homeless and OD’ing.
Pissing people off in LA and then running back inside your house is not a good idea.
They totally know where you live and one day you will piss off the wrong person or people.
Maybe Mother Nature needs to take back her land and show the homeowners who is the boss at the beach….
@@BettyBlack99these are rich entitled assholes who don’t care about anything but their property value, so they can suck it
In 20 years coastal erosion by the surf will remove the beach and homes
That'll be beautiful ...
@canadiangirl5119 mother nature will take her house
@@BettyBlack99shut up... It's public land and roping off from a deck into the surf don't change shit
Who expects different behavior from rich snobs in Malibu. The name says it all.
Always been that way. I own the Pacific Ocean as for out as you can see. BS. Surfers and fishermen have all gone thru this all the way up the coast.
@@martinnorbeck4657 I think the fishermen and surfers would win you on land they on water. Who is more vulnerable?
@@1911Earthling I agree with that. The surfers and the fishermen need access as well as beach goers. What I hate about people is they leave behind trash.
"The name says it all." What do you mean by that? What 'name' are you referring to?
Not Me!
People that act in that manner should be able to be charged with harassment. I remember a person saying I couldn’t park on a street in front of his house because it was private even though there were public parking signs
guess who is subject to a lawsuit here...?
IN NO WAY can you keep people off there !
Maybe we should start dumping them from the border to the beach line maybe then we can get some different results from our political arena
That crazy woman is dead wrong. She may not like it, but the public has access to the beach. We all own a piece of the ocean, and these wealthy scumbags need to be taught a lesson.
@@NomenClature-o8s didn’t the police make her take it out
you do not own a thing.
@@ingridfitz5677 There is public access to the beach and the home owner in that area actually owns the beach 10 feet above mean high tide. READ the law.
@@NomenClature-o8syou clearly haven’t read it either , you must be one of the sunburnt cockroaches in the video 😂 the homeowner’s property line STOPS at the high tide line, everything below it is PUBLIC.
Nah. Not dead. Not “dead.” Not “dead”. /
people pay taxes for public parks and beaches....this is crazy
No these Mexican invaders pay nothing they just destroy and over run everything
@@jaAYnuMbeR5 and people pay for their private property. Maybe a few dozen people should just walk across your front yard everyday, set up and picnic and leave their trash on your lawn?
@@NomenClature-o8s the beach ISN'T their property
@@cliftonking2004 Yes it is. Look at a GIS map for Laguna Beach California. The homeowners there actually own part of the beach
Someone give her some donuts fast to calm her down.
And a ham
She's providing both hams 😂
Probably a tube steak
or a Starbucks drink, Karens love their Starbucks
*doughnuts
If I had it my way, there would not be ANY houses on the coastlines in America. I would push the public access to 1/2 a mile or more, with no houses within this boundary.
That's how it is in Australia. People also have the right to access any natural waterway, too.
@@jublywublythe aussies are ahead of their time
You poor rich snobs.
Some of them actually own parts of the beach.
God sold it to them? Who has the right to sell the earth? Nobody owns the beach
@@fastesteddiealive 100% wrong. The law is very clear. The land owner’s property (in that jurisdiction) is 10 feet above the mean high tide. Do some actual research before writing whatever sounds good inside your head.
@@NomenClature-o8s That lady is probably renting the home and is just expanding what was already set-up.
@@erikh9991 Do you just write dumb stuff that pops into your head? She’s the property owner. 🙄
Karen needs to chill....its a public beach you dont own that
@@jsalga She owns 10 feet above mean high tide.
She figures if she pretends to own it then people will stay away from the thing that she wants to own, but can’t
No, she needs a month in jail. She's been doing it over and over according to many posters. It also wasn't the first time she was warned by law enforcement. They just need to charge her and it will stop.
@@mosherbyact Except it’s her land. READ THE LAW.
@@NomenClature-o8s
It isn’t.
That Laguna Beach lady bought the wrong house! She is right next to the public access entry point. I would rent it to out on abb.
Recipe for disaster…
Entitled “rich” people. Please file charges for battery with law enforcement.
Mason cops will drag their feet, and if it ever goes to court the Mason judge will settle for a three digit fine and no recorded conviction.
Money protects money. Power protects power.
It’s not an entitlement issue ; it’s societal
@@chadkelham5034 In ten years, laws will quietly be passed with bi-partisan support that allow beaches to become private, and nobody will ever remember having 'voted for that'.
It's not left vs right. It's the mega rich vs everyone else. They just give us left vs right so we chase each other's tail while they steal everything.
When someone trespasses on your property you will not touch them? Despite what you think, they bought the property with the shoreline and California Coastal act is for new construction and doesn't apply to these owners.
@@jonathanprice8119 Imagine simping for rich people that see you as a slave.
This happens everywhere people have frontage on the water
So the woman who used fear and intimidation to have some leave public property gets a “talking to”…that’s justice for you.
Sounds about white lol
Maybe it was actually was her property…after the mean high tide.
@@Xxxxxx2x Wrong, go look at a GIS map of Laguna Beach. It’s shows the property lines for each house. It clearly shows that many homeowners do own a portion of the beach.
🔴 *This public beach "Karens Private Beach" is on Google Maps* DO ONLY give 5 Star reviews
@@pilarq7886 lol this is awesome
Laguna Beach lady needs to chill. Probably doesn't have many friends to begin with.
She wouldn’t care as she’s rich
Laguna beach has become the new hotspot because nobody wants to go to Santa Monica or Long Beach or Venice.
If you go to Venice you get sexually assaulted, if you go to Santa Monica you get harassed by homeless, if you go to Long Beach you step on used drug needles. So now everyone and their cousin is going to Laguna and setting up tents and leaving dirty diapers and corona bottles when they leave -the people who live there are fed up.
Who needs friends when you got a beach house
She is lucky my family and friends wasn’t there that day! 😂😂😂
Apparently she’s just renting the house… 🤡
They own the house, not the beach.
@@donmcc6573 they’re on the property their house is on.
What is the problem here?
@paulballard304 What is the problem? The fact that they’re wrong, and so are you. The beach is NOT part of their property.
@paulballard304 it's all about property lines. Property lines never extend into the beach. It is like a street. I don't go roping a street up just because the cars are too loud.
@@SanchoSanto Something that’s not truthful is not correct, the private property lines do exist on all sides.
@@paulballard304 yes. All properties have lines around it. However, they don't extend into the beach here in California because by law the beach can't be owned. A property survey will mark the border lines for owners and these surveys are always done before a home is bought. This means that home owners know where their property ends.
We pay for the regular restoration of those beaches. If they want to own the sand, they can pay for it.
I don't care how much they pay, it's public land, period. No amount of money can own what is freely everyone's equal right.
The reason why they spend multi million dollars for those houses out there is because they want to get away from the mess they have created from the inner city
PUBLIC‼️😎 good job for getting this out there and educating people living there .
Out of control homeowners and homeowner associations.
they are not out of control at all
@@BlackTarH
Oh yes they are
Do some research
HOAs are a plague
That angry resident should move out instead of making false claim on property rights
Go to a GIS map of Laguna Beach. It’s shows the property lines for each house. It clearly shows that many homeowners do own a portion of the beach.
If a big wave hit her house, she would insist that the people that she doesn't want on her sand pay for her losses.
She said its dog friendly and im like “ohhhh thats nice” and then the sign says “ No dogs” 🤣
yeah in la county signs do not matter it seems
ooh, good catch! lol
There also are problems with property owners planting plants on public beach lands.
How many times do you have to tell these people they do not own the sand!!
They know. They do not care.
@@dzerkle And the rule that you can only be on wet sand is stupid!
@@Miss-Katherine It's the high tide line. Nowadays, that's right up to their houses.
Imagine being so rich that you can afford to live in the beach, but at the same time being so angry??
Nothing worse that’s a Karen with money.
These are the same people that think that you should welcome illegal immigrants into YOUR backyard. 🤷♂️
Makes it so much worse when they are ugly.
😀
Same thing is happening in Mexico with retired U.S. citizens trying to take over beaches
Good. Payback's a bitch
Bad idea to press the locals 😂
Update on the laguna beach homeowner:
She has a history of complaints to LBPD regarding trespassing, which were deemed illegitimate, she now has been given a court date for her efforts to stop beach goers from entering what she deems “her property”. The California Coastal Commission, which has quasi-judicial control of the land and public access along the state’s coast line is involved and currently investigating the matter.
Hippos are very territorial
Actually hippos eat ppl. Friend who grew up swimming in the Nile typically lost a friend every year from hungry hippos - sad!
Winner! lol
@@LunaShimmyDiva They are herbivores. They kill but not to eat.
Lol
She'd make a nice shark meal...
Everyone should go there on saturday and set camp 🎉😂
And the Cops should arrest anyone who is trespassing on her property.
User nobody is on her property that’s the whole point. I’m pretty sure u are the lady. They made her take ropes down and told her she’s a bi$ch just like you are. Your trust fund days will run out eventually
I'll be there, dude! Gonna be a rager!
@@NomenClature-o8s It’s not her property dim wit it’s a public beach.
@@NomenClature-o8s
I’m sure the cops know her by now and I doubt they will show up for her or she would have called em for this incident
This has been going on for decades in CA. I would never damage anyone’s property, but my friends may have sent some very expensive and inconvenient messages to beach front homeowners in the 80’s. Good times 👍
You and your friends are part of the problem.
@@garygolfer3243 Bragging about destruction of property. Nice.
@@NomenClature-o8s Thanks! It is nice to know people pay for their transgressions against others, and your support is appreciated 👍
@@NomenClature-o8s Your snowflake status is confirmed. Go back to your safe space 🤣👍
@@NomenClature-o8s Glad you agree! It’s always nice when karma gets a helping hand 👍
Things fueling this:
1. California when you count illegals California population grew by 10+ million in the last 2 decades. Virtually everyone lives near the coast. So that 10 million extra beach goers for the same beach length.
2. Massive beach erosion. There are beaches where in 2000 where water was 1000+ feet from the nearest home. Today in high tide water is less than 100 feet to that same home.
3. The decline of civil behavior in the last decade. You can go to plenty of eating establishments in California that had booths a decade ago that are now only take out only because of the decline if basic civil behavior.
She lives on the ocean…and still complaining! Damn.
White elephant seal needs to be IN THE OCEAN.
All could be avoided if everyone was respectful to each other. Visitors need to pick up their trash, stay off the property that is private, use good judgment during their visit. I'm sure the residents are fed up with those who behave badly during their time at the beach. The residents can't think that the beach is all theirs. If there are problems, try to work it out, everyone should know the laws that pertain there, and follow them. Beaches are places to relax and chill
I live in Oregon, so am more familiar with our beaches. Our coast is very rugged, some small coves are impossible to access without crossing private property, even on the lowest tide. And our population numbers are very low, in comparison to southern California.
In Portland we have a huge problem with Fentanyl addiction, and homeless living on the streets. I have seen a lot of trash, and drug consumption here. So, yeah sometimes individuals behave in ways that are objectionable and offensive, in public spaces.
I can imagine after a few bad experiences, the "Karen" in this story just lost it.
Or maybe she us just an entitled rich *itch, I don't know.
@@docwatson1134 Oregon beaches are huge too. I'd go kiteboarding many times on the coast and I'd have the entire beach to myself.
This is one of the few adult, well reasoned posts here, but it only has 25 likes at this point.
@@docwatson1134 She is actually in some trouble with the California Costal Commision. She was sent a letter and the fine could be $11,000 a day if she does not comply, by removing the roped off area. I felt sorry for the little boy in the video. Traumatized by a raging person, when he was just having time with his family at the beach. I have been there a few times, it was a lovely place, but it appears that a lot more people are going there now, which might instigate more problems.
@@jasong9774 Thank you
The mind of a person with money must be frustrating
Living examples of “money can’t buy happiness”
They bought the house not the beach
We should ask a real estate agent about this 'my property' thing...
We homeowners are fed up! This news are not showing the truth about our situation, people come to the beach to pollute, Make noise, get drunk, destroy things and who knows what else, until the police arrives the disaster already happened! And there's no consequences at all!
Homes near the ocean should be illegal!
Why start a fight on the beach. If you think you own the land do a proper survey and put up a fence along your property line. If it isn't yours then stop arguing.
"Dog friendly" that sign behind the reporter says no dogs, Lol!
You're Right! Ugh! Hopefully we Don't see a Sign that says: No People Allowed on the Beach!! Just Awful!! 🤔☹️😠😠💔🖤🕊️
😂 good eye!
dogs suck
It's important to add that beach visitors should never leave garbage behind. Be respectful.
But they are not which is why homeowners complain and rightfully so.
@@f430ferrari5 Probably most people are clean and respectful, but there's always a few who ruin it for everybody.
I totally agree. The beaches are public and visitors are welcomed but they still have that responsibility of taking their trash with them instead of leaving it behind.
When you say “be respectful” I assume you’re talking about towards Mother Earth and not the home owners right?😂😂😂 …. But seriously here in the state of Washington much of the waterfront is private do to an old and illegitimate law that was written to help early oyster farmers so god bless CA for getting that part right
@@garciaizm
Don't leave garbage. Full stop. No need to specify who or what benefits from the decency.
Double standards officials allow big resorts to take over the beach. All beaches should be public.
Agreed. I stand behind you on this.
As long as we hold them accountable.
There has to be some type of balance, like if a resort decides to put umbrellas and chairs on the beach it can’t be restricted to hotel guests only.
I do like the idea the hotel would keep the part that they’re caretaking clean.
I just came back from the beach, it was filthy. I’ve never seen Malibu that disgusting.
Luckily I had taken a trash bag with me, I gathered whatever pieces of trash I could.
The items I collected seemed to be lost items. Things being taken out of people pockets when they’re in the waves, also plastic fast food items.
Stupidity is forever, regardless of your status in life. Once you have it, it stays with you wherever you go. You can’t fix it.
what an archaic old guy saying....'you cant film me without my permission...' like its 1973 in California
If it were on his property, he's right...he can't legally be filmed without his permission. However, that's the story isn't it? Is it his property? My guess is no...
Lmao!! Right?!
Watch this beach go viral… people are going to show up in droves.
🔴 *This public beach "Karens Private Beach" is on Google Maps* DO ONLY give 5 Star reviews
The problem is that these rich people feel they are entitled to more and more, just because they paid millions of dollars
Millions of dollars don’t mean 💩
If you bought a house next to a public beach 🤣
CA AINT FLORIDA- entire 1000 mile coastline of CA is open and public- END OF STORY
If you're directly behind their house, then it's their backyard. You wouldn't like it either if someone was behind your house, whether it was the beach, mountains or a river. However, if you move away from directly behind the house, there wouldn't be an issue.
@@regaininglife9084they might call it there back yrd but is where is the property line .
@@regaininglife9084
Totally false
@@regaininglife9084law and order matter to most of us
No one owns the beach.
For the couple that was commenting on how great it was and it was dog friendly, the rules printed on the sign next to that one public access point to the beach clearly says no dogs allowed. That's a rule I personally would expect to see for public beaches. They are obviously in violation.
Some people think we're not animals. LMAO. Here, you have territorial humans willing to use violence for territory. And they say the animals were put here for us. Such BS.
They’ll take the beach and even miles straight out into the ocean. These people need heavy fines for harassment etc
You can be rich and still be angry at life
So very true!
She should maybe afford a personal trainer
Might help with her anger
@@Max4Z Maybe a Therapist?? 🤦🤷☹️
They played themselves... Now so many people are gonna show up.
As far as the tide rolls up. Unfortunately the homeowner is correct. She just acted like a clown
Lechuza and Victoria beaches should be much more popular from now on. 😂
🔴 *This public beach "Karens Private Beach" is on Google Maps* DO ONLY give 5 Star reviews
If I could afford that area I would gladly share it. Just respect nature and that's all.
That’s easy to say when you don’t own it hahaha
I think those folks are stressed out of their minds trying to hold on to properties and a lifestyle that is becoming more and more expensive by the day.
Idk give grace because we don’t know what everyone is going through…
But also don’t walk up on me at the beach either 😂😅
Sonia, then post your address and invite people to have picnics on your front lawn.
You won’t.
The thing is it’s not yours to share. It’s a public area
@@Imjusttryingtotellu The thing is it’s not yours to share. It’s a public area
@@NomenClature-o8s The thing is it’s not yours to share. It’s a public area
I too have a problem parking on a public street in front of someone’s house claiming I can’t park in front of their house.
These are the same people that put up a " local only traffic " sign at the entrance to their streets
She had the area in front for her property already roped off, get a restraining order on her, she is harassing that mother and child.
Wouldn’t it be easier to just send a cop to inform the property owners the law concerning public access to beaches?
Damn, y’all do shit the hard way.
😅. This is California. In most situations you can't even get a cop to show up unless there's blood involved. The answer to your question is no. Now someone with a cell phone could actually look up the statute and show it to the homeowner but then there would be a dispute about where the mean high tide line is. It's not the simple issue that you think it is because all animals are territorial.
The simplest thing to do would be to have a clear fence that delineates your property, so that people know where it starts and where they can't walk. Since it is related to high tide, there should be a marking of some sort. How can tourists know where the limits of the property are if not indicated?
Lady has a beach house and looks like she has never swam a day in her life. Lol
Are you fat shaming? That’s horrendous
Who cares? If it’s her land.
Beached Whale
It’s not her land that’s the whole point they made her take the ropes down and told her she’s a bi$ch. you must be a trust fund baby just like her.
For the user above afraid to have a real name so he can troll on utube
Please do not go to 2846 wards terrace to humble the 4legged one in the beginning
send all the homeless there
"We own the beach because we are rich now get off!" so annoying but what is also annoying is visitors that go to the beach and don't pick up their trash!
If "get off my lawn " was a beach. Or "you can't park in front of my house" was sand.
You won the internet today!
The beach belongs to us all, fricking entitled rich people
A Californian once told me Californian’s aren’t nice and I took that shit to heart.
All 39 million of them?? That's so illogical to be believe that.
@@adolfocamblor9295 lol a Californian said it, not me but I’m just taking her word- how can Californians watch folks suffering on a sidewalk for a decade and not flinch is beyond me.
@@Imjusttryingtotellu Are there no homeless where you live? Have you provided shelter for any of them?
@@adolfocamblor9295 you’re getting upset with me over something I didn’t even say…
Yes we do have homeless but we have several shelters in the area so they don’t stay on the street for long.
It’s sad when these people buy homes by the beach in California and assume the beach is theirs. They need to realize the beach has always been for everyone as we Californians share the beach.
I can't stand people who say bro, but he's right
She doesn't own where the water hits the sand !! Plain and simple can't be hard to understand !
The beaches are public but there shouldn’t be forced public access either. I’ve seen cases where the city uses convoluted justifications to force private land to create an access for public. And on the other side of it, there are beach goers that are rude, loud, and trash these beaches. That increases the tension. There’s a balance.
That Malibu guy is going to have real problems in the future.
If anyone touched me. They would be in a world of trouble.
Be wearing her lips as eyebrows
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Karen is comming for you! 😂
no they won’t
okay tough guy...
The arrogance and entitlement of people with money
Well that IS a generalization. Am not a rich person, but I have had periods in my life where I have been rich and Ive always been to earth cuz am punk AF and I used to know a weed grower that made millions and he was never entitled,as a matter of fact when he quit he gave all the rest of the plants, buds and colas to friend afflicted with cancer.
I think social class generalizations are completely false because social class define being conscious or not. That is a Marxist myth. The glorious working classes supported fascism in the 30ties. Consciousness is defined by individualist affirmation of the self & Ego and the rejection of all domination and control of individual @autonomy.
Greedy home owners
In 20 years coastal erosion by the surf will remove the beach and homes
It doesn’t remove it. It just moves it.
Those people are extremely rich. They think they bought the ocean because the house was so expensive.
If that was her property, she'd have something permanent up
Exactly
It’s not her property. Putting up something permanent would get her dragged into court. Now some rich people are willing to spend the money on lawyers to keep their illegal structures up.
@@neilkurzman4907 Well no kidding it's not her property. That's what my comment said
Guess I'll bring the boys out to Lechuza instead of Leo, looks killer! Thank you Fox, Karim and ESPECIALLY the local home owners for the publicity, see you soon.
People are gross who think they own nature
Feel free to leave the country. Land belongs to those who hold it. By your logic, every American is gross including your own founding . Use your head, don't be a Californian.