Analysis: 5:14 of video. 28 second intro, 98 seconds of montage and outro. That leaves 3:36 of "content" that, with a brief also in Spitfires bit on the engine, consisted of vaguely point at thing and name it while the camera wanders off. It's not even new the same video was published on 09/11/2020.
Was that it! what about the driver area. didn't even do any history of the tank development and the other variants. Shows how much WOT and wargaming love the british tanks, if it was a Russian tank you would get twice as long.
There is any obj 268? :l Because i saw in the game that it was built and passed the tests, but didnt entered in the mass production, i would like to see that next :D
Considering that the 17 pounder was designed in 1941, why was the Cromwell not designed to take it? Why was there so much push back to mount it in British tanks? When mounted on a Challenger, there was a rediculous staff requirement to accomodate 2 loaders, but when mounted in a Sherman, that requirement was not enforced.
Your comment is old, but the Cromwell was supposed to have a long barreled 75mm gun with much better penetration. But the turret was to small and they decided to upscale then 6 Pounder instead which could then use American 75mm HE. The Firefly became a stopgap untill the Comet was introduced
Thanks. Very informative. But the music?That music? It doesn't fit and it doesn't make sense. It could be better with different music. Or even better than that with none!!
Bugger Challenger, you might do well to review your propensity to say 'actual'. Is there a difference between 'seeing' and 'actually seeing', or between a 'design' and an 'actual design'?
The first thirty seconds featured terrible audio deficiencies. At one minute in, another audio hiccup happened. You lot can produce better video's cheaper by not trying to spice things up.
What tank would you like to see next?
Isu 152
Panzerkampfwagen2
Kranvagn ;) half of it is at arsenalen.
Conqueror pls
Never mind kv2
AMX 30,CHALLENGER,B1 BIS,M4 SHERMAN,M6,M26 PERSHING.
Cromwell definitely deserves a longer video.
This was lousily short compared to wonderful the "Inside The Chieftain's Hatch" videos. I don't blame Mr. Cutland, but this short format itself.
Analysis: 5:14 of video. 28 second intro, 98 seconds of montage and outro. That leaves 3:36 of "content" that, with a brief also in Spitfires bit on the engine, consisted of vaguely point at thing and name it while the camera wanders off.
It's not even new the same video was published on 09/11/2020.
These really need to be longer.
Was that it! what about the driver area. didn't even do any history of the tank development and the other variants.
Shows how much WOT and wargaming love the british tanks, if it was a Russian tank you would get twice as long.
So what happened to describing the other four crew positions - ?
It was a fast small low silhouette to give them a quick response to get there and back
Also note the Insignia od Polish first armored division. Cue the winged hussars song...
There is any obj 268? :l
Because i saw in the game that it was built and passed the tests, but didnt entered in the mass production, i would like to see that next :D
WG likes paper tonks ;)
Where is the Chieftain? You didnt even tell us how to adjust track tension!
Good thing they used green and didn't crom it well.
I’ll show you the door
Thanks dad!
Whirlwind tour... where’s the Chieftain??
He stuck trying getting out of the hatch of a burning kitchen!
Get quicky on the line
Considering that the 17 pounder was designed in 1941, why was the Cromwell not designed to take it? Why was there so much push back to mount it in British tanks? When mounted on a Challenger, there was a rediculous staff requirement to accomodate 2 loaders, but when mounted in a Sherman, that requirement was not enforced.
Your comment is old, but the Cromwell was supposed to have a long barreled 75mm gun with much better penetration. But the turret was to small and they decided to upscale then 6 Pounder instead which could then use American 75mm HE. The Firefly became a stopgap untill the Comet was introduced
How driver drive? I dont see any gas or controls much
Bring back The Chieftain and/or Sofilein to talk about tanks!
cromwell go hill ill suport u Aiming G3 reloading 11 seconds left
Killer Cromwell hi from Turkey.
How can I buy Cromwell B today? Is it still possible? I tried to look 4 it on wargaming site but I couldn't find it.
Does it worth to get it?
Thanks. Very informative. But the music?That music? It doesn't fit and it doesn't make sense. It could be better with different music. Or even better than that with none!!
I appreciate the videos, but you must improve the footage of the exterior. Pan more and give a better overview. Less details and more panning please.
Is it small ?
about 10 tons lighter than a sherman but about 5 tons heavier than the Panzer 4.
Poor man's version of inside the chieftain's hatch with an infuriatingly annoying backing track to boot
Orange color and wings, it must be polish :-)
Bugger Challenger, you might do well to review your propensity to say 'actual'. Is there a difference between 'seeing' and 'actually seeing', or between a 'design' and an 'actual design'?
I want to see stridsvagn 103
So is this the movie star from Band of Brothers?
KV-2 please
Plz EU server with +1-1 matchmaking plz plz plz. Everyone would love that change.
this is the besttt
Wanna see jg100 next
This tank never existed in real life.
Old musics
Who chose the music and why is a 40-50 year old man dressed as a teenager?
Stop with the vignette and color cast in editing!!
The first thirty seconds featured terrible audio deficiencies. At one minute in, another audio hiccup happened. You lot can produce better video's cheaper by not trying to spice things up.
very basic needs to get his info across in more detail didn't really learn much about the tank at all.
NO Sup Thia
Su 101