You boldly proclaim in the thumbnail “starliner is OVER”, then proceed to say In the voiceover “I don’t mean to suggest that there’s definitely a problem with starliner”. YES YOU DID. Stop lying in your thumbnails.
Fact: Starliner Was Neer Ready To Safely Launch From Earth Starliner Was Rushed From Their Own Pressures Of Being Far Behind Their Own Schedule & Others Way Ahead Fact: Boeing Launch Knowing They Would Have Issues Amounting To Gambling Lives Fact: Boeing & Nasa Not Able To Cover Nor Further Try To Cover For Starliner Fact: These Space Shorts Are Too Boeing Friendly """❣️""" """👍😎👌"""
REMEMBER IT WAS THE ENGINEERS AT NASA THAT LAUNCHED A FROZEN SHUTTLE, AN DEORBIT A SHUTTLE WITH A HOLE IN IT KILLING BOTH CREWS ON NATIONAL TELEVISION, PLUS THERE CIVILIAN AIRCRAFT FALLING APART ACOSS THE SKYS OF AMERICA. BOEING IS FINISH.
Let Boeing's record speak for itself. The only reason Boeing is still in the space industry is due to the no solo provider clause the government inacted. It is a good policy but choosing Boeing was their mistake.
Now is the time for NASA to switch to Sierra Space as the second manned flight provider. Boeing's management problems are showing up throughout their company. And Sierra Space have continued onward on their own. Plus a ride for Sierra Space may be denied due to ULA's Space Force contracts. They need support and be given a chance to ride into space via Space X. Sierra Space should not be continued to be edged out.
Posters need to stop the BS and tell it as it is. Starliner is a failure, period. If I was the two astronauts who are stuck in space I’d say “Send a Dragon , we don’t want to try and die in the Starliner “!!!
it is baffling that NASA and Boeing had to wait until the Starliner was on space at the Space Station to do those tests. It looks like a proof of total incompetence. Why didn’t they do those tests with the un-crewed previous mission?
Gov agencies and gov-related corporations are corrupted and they are protecting each other. Boeing just go a slap on the wrist for vanishing 346 souls. No one is in jail. NASA sent the Challenger knowing about issues. No one is in jail. Criminals are managing these organizations. There is no wisdom there. We can't expect them to test the vehicle several times before sending humans up to space.
Click bait, no new info here! Just bring Starliner home autonomously and then send a falcon 9 dragon to pick up the astronauts. Easy and safe yet none of you TH-camrs have suggested it. Duh!
@@michaelpettersson4919 No. This isn't about politics - it's about corporate Big-Shots and their egos. It's about favoritism for a company that has been a long-time contractor for the Dept. of Defense, is too used to bilking the Taxpayers the maximum amount of money it can steal, and has too many friends in high places. Why - to some people - is EVERYTHING about POLITICS?
VERY DISAPPOINTED in your recent rush to CLICK BAIT. You title, as you used to do, about actual new events or news, then present old events or old news with a "back down" disclaiming statement or question. Or WORSE a compilation of re-edited clips that aren't even tied togeyher well or are redundant. If you have nothing NEW, say THAT up front or just don't post. NOTHING IN THIS POST is new or even different from the material previously presented. STOP WASTING OUR TIME!
I say it is time to figure out rescue missions. Twice, now, we have had major failures, Apollo 13 and Columbia. Once, they managed to hold it together and get back. You think accidents are not going to happen again?
they should ask the entire astronaut corps to decide if they should use the starliner for the return, include the retirees too . . . if they think it's too dangerous to use a flawed spacecraft then just don't. i know that astronauts have the biggest, brassiest balls but they are also realists and, i hope, wouldn't put two of their own at unnecessary risk.
Testing those thrusters while docked on the spacestation could alter its attitude. This should teach Boeing that simulations aren't enough. All the testing being done now should have been done long before sending it to space with a crew. Dump the junk and send for Dragon.
Yes, that has been my thinking. Dragon ride for the crew and bring Starliner back in auto mode. Save the data and figure it out before sending another one into space.
Boeing is experiencing QUALITY CONTROL issues in all divisions, since bean counters and "professional" managers took over top corporate management positions. The luster of Boeing has dulled and is fading fast. If they don't reverse course soon, it is highly likely Boeing won't make it to 2040 or even 2030! They are failing in QUALITY in industries that demand the highest standards of quality products and services.
Anyone posting and narrating videos about space and space vehicles, should have at the very least, a rudimentary understanding of the orbital physics involved in a de-orbit and stop spreading "folk lore". Objects entering our atmosphere at extreme velocities DO NOT heat up from FRICTION!!!!! Objects heat up from compression of the air, not friction. The same way ignition in a diesel engine is provided by the heat of high compression....the air in front of a speedy object heats up. Please, let's not perpetuate commonly held lies.
NASA's commercial crew programme manager Steve Stich must be held accountable if anything goes wrong with the helium leak on Starliner because he is always delaying any alternate ways to bring the astronauts back to Earth.
Easy solution! Send Dragon to retrieve astronauts , and try and land Starliner Empty, one way or the other, we would either have had alive astronauts, or NOT!
Steve is confident that the astronauts they delivered to the ISS are not in immediate danger, but has no confidence as to how they can get them back, except to say that it should OK.
Start financially punishing Boeing instead of expecting the Feds to absorb the costs. If Boeing knew Starliner had these problems before launch, they should be liable for costs incurred.
Is NASA footing the bill for all this testing, or is Boeing? Seeing that Boeing received more for they're commercial contract than SpaceX, has NASA been footing the bill to fix SpaceX's few problems?
Boeing have been left in the dust as it relates to the many successful missions that SpaceX has accomplished so far with better tech. Bezos should stick with what they do well; building planes and military equipment. The company need to get their heads out of their butts and let SpaceX go to the ISS and rescue the two astronauts before it's too late to do so. On the flip side, IF Starliner is so safe for the astronauts to return, then why are they dragging their heels while attempting to save face with studies on this or that and not back on earth?! They are full of wishful thinking and self-reliance when it isn't necessary. I've noticed Jeff Bezos is unwilling to admit he and his team are over their heads in this field.
How can it bring them home safely in an emergency but not on a regular return trip. Makes no sense. The “emergency” is basically a Hail Mary I hope it works.
Manually flying causes excessive stress on the thrusters tells me that the capsule isn't and never will be safe for humans but rather autonomous resupply.
That what happen when accounts run engineering firm. When it comes to management, no performance metrics can replace personal subject/matter expertise.
Elon... PLEASE... PLEASE.... ... Call this part of Space X "International Rescue" and name all your ships "Thunderbird X" starting, of course... with "Thunderbird 7" to rescue the Boeing crew.
I don't see the crisis. I believe SpaceX has a scheduled launch to the ISS in a couple of weeks. Bring Starliner back without a crew, to see if the thrusters work. Consider it a test. I don't this should necessarily mean the end of Starliner, space is hard and Boeing is learning. Starliner crew gets an extra month or two in space. They're astronauts. Aren't they enjoying this experience? Bring Starliner's crew back in Crew Dragon. Doesn't it usually fly with a couple of empty seats? I'm sure this is oversimplification.
I don't think you want to @1:40 keep a fueled spacecraft on standby. Fueling up doesn't take anywhere near as long as it does to prep a vehicle. I wonder if it's even possible to keep a vehicle on standby, since several things such as the FTS have a very short lifespan and need to be inspected/replaced when they expire. Also the shape of the return capsule is designed to make it "self-orienting" @5:50, requiring only correct orientation at atmospheric insertion. The computers are in the return capsule, there is not "vital information" @6:39 in the service module - what's in there is all the bits that the engineers would love to get a look at to see why it broke.
Remember that it's paid in milestones. NASA has not paid out the full contract value or even close at this point. NASA also did not pay anything for the OFT-2 mission that Boeing had to fly.
For me the best thing for NASA to do is tell Beoing to bring the Starliner back - crewless. The crew will then go on a newly launched Dragon and return to Earth.
Keep a fueled rocket on standby? Nah. That's one of the least time-consuming parts of getting Dragon and Falcon 9 ready. And, um... while I love all things rockets, I am not a rocket expert.
That's not a funny "joke," and I'm certain Musk did NOT denigrate the skills of "old Engineers" - he has many of the best of them working for him. Old engineers are good engineers - it's a field where EXPERIENCE DOES MATTER. The problem isn't "old engineers," the problem is that they let go many of them, and replaced them with MBA's who were more intent on turning the company upside down to empty its pockets into the hands of people like their new CEO - who got a raise this year: DOUBLE his salary from last year, as he was restructuring the company to farm out projects like "Starliner" piecemeal, to various subcontractors - and now they are utterly confused about why they don't know what's wrong, or how to fix it, as new problems continue to crop up. This is what happens when competent engineers are no longer directly designing, and Quality-Control checking, their own, internal work.
Let starliner come back uncrewed as a proof of concept for reentry. Put 2 extra seats on the Crew-9 dragon and bring the starliner crew safely back to earth.
Your last few comments were RIDICULOUS: "Boeing should help SpaceX develop blah-blah?" Why, in the name of whatever, do you think that SpaceX needs BOEING, of all companies, to "help" iot with ANYTHING? They are so far ahead of Boeing in the development of rocket engines and spacecraft, it would be like a Space Engineer asking a High-School kid for help. Or did you say that NASA should help SpaceX? That, too, is absurd. The way you phrased that statement ( around 00:12:36 ) left it completely unclear what you meant - read the script again; you'll understand.
If those brave astronauts try to return in the Boeing Starliner and it hits the atmosphere at the wrong attitude they will die,! Undocking Starliner uncrewed and having it do an automated return. Is the only way to see if it will burn up. This will protect the astronaut's lives. Starliner has a price tag, human life does not. Using the dragon for a rescue vehicle is a no-brainer.
As safety minded NASA is I was surprised that they decided to launch given the problems discovered on the ground. I wonder who got a pay out and how much. Something smells fishy.
By the itme Starliner gets certified to carry a human crew again there will not be enough time for Starliner to complete 6 missions to the ISS before NASA gives ISS to SpaceX for demolition.
We landed men on the moon because human input was still a respected resource. Now we are drowning in an out of control mess of mindless automation too complicated to control.
If I were one of the people who were sent to the spacestation I would be very afraid of the spaceliner to be safely 🙏 returned to earth and not die trying.
Not quite correct. SpaceX does heavy modeling and sim as well, the difference is that SpaceX is willing to invest in test articles, sacrificial if necessary, in order test out the hardware and software against their models. Boeing will not spend that money as their contract cost is already significantly higher than SpaceX's without the test articles.
Give ULA a cost plus(100%) contract to save Starliner because they didn't have enough money on hard bid to get there.( Cost over twice as Dragon, to fail.)
The "more testing" is so much BS. Unless the orbiting team can disassemble the service module whilst at the ISS then the testing is pretty uninformative. Bring 'em home.
You boldly proclaim in the thumbnail “starliner is OVER”, then proceed to say In the voiceover “I don’t mean to suggest that there’s definitely a problem with starliner”. YES YOU DID. Stop lying in your thumbnails.
is called Click bait..😅
This is all old news being sensationalized for more clicks. I thought this channel was better than this.
Fact: Starliner Was Neer Ready To Safely Launch From Earth
Starliner Was Rushed From Their Own Pressures Of Being Far Behind Their Own Schedule & Others Way Ahead
Fact: Boeing Launch Knowing They Would Have Issues Amounting To Gambling Lives
Fact: Boeing & Nasa Not Able To Cover Nor Further Try To Cover For Starliner
Fact: These Space Shorts Are Too Boeing Friendly
"""❣️"""
"""👍😎👌"""
I unsubsidized
I gave up after 5 minutes.
Boeing has failed . Starliner had big problems before launch , it should have never gone up .
Is Boeing's attitude "These astronauts are probably DEI hires anyway? If you lose one, you lose one. There are always thousands more."
This is no time for testing. The vehicle has continuously flunked the tests
So Boeing is finally doing all the testing on the ground that they should have done years ago during development?
Only Boeing could copy an Apollo capsule and screw it up.
Boeing is becoming a joke! They care more about their stock value than the quality of their machines!
They should ditch this capsule rather than put two precious lives at mortal risk, and send SpaceX.
REMEMBER IT WAS THE ENGINEERS AT NASA THAT LAUNCHED A FROZEN SHUTTLE, AN DEORBIT A SHUTTLE WITH A HOLE IN IT KILLING BOTH CREWS ON NATIONAL TELEVISION, PLUS THERE CIVILIAN AIRCRAFT FALLING APART ACOSS THE SKYS OF AMERICA. BOEING IS FINISH.
NASA FINISHED TOO, THERE CEOS ARE JUST TOO GREEDY AND REALLY DONT CARE ABOUT SAFTEY.
NASA astronauts have to be taught "IF IT'S BOEING?I AIN'T GOING!!!!
Everyone knows, "If its BOEING, it'll go boing, Boing BOING" ... like the Slinky ... then it'll Crash and Burn" 🚀🔥
The click bait thumbnails have got old quick. It honestly stops me from subscribing to the channels.
Boeing space missions are a joke, only death comes to using Boeing. Sad but true.
Let Boeing's record speak for itself. The only reason Boeing is still in the space industry is due to the no solo provider clause the government inacted. It is a good policy but choosing Boeing was their mistake.
Now is the time for NASA to switch to Sierra Space as the second manned flight provider. Boeing's management problems are showing up throughout their company. And Sierra Space have continued onward on their own. Plus a ride for Sierra Space may be denied due to ULA's Space Force contracts. They need support and be given a chance to ride into space via Space X. Sierra Space should not be continued to be edged out.
You'd think this issue would have been discovered during testing. Perhaps rushing to fulfill their contract was an issue.
Posters need to stop the BS and tell it as it is. Starliner is a failure, period. If I was the two astronauts who are stuck in space I’d say “Send a Dragon , we don’t want to try and die in the Starliner “!!!
At this point, thruster should not be a problem.We've used thrusters for a long, long time.And so why now is this a serious issue
If you can’t run with the big boys, the puppies need to stay home on the porch.
it is baffling that NASA and Boeing had to wait until the Starliner was on space at the Space Station to do those tests. It looks like a proof of total incompetence. Why didn’t they do those tests with the un-crewed previous mission?
Gov agencies and gov-related corporations are corrupted and they are protecting each other. Boeing just go a slap on the wrist for vanishing 346 souls. No one is in jail. NASA sent the Challenger knowing about issues. No one is in jail. Criminals are managing these organizations. There is no wisdom there. We can't expect them to test the vehicle several times before sending humans up to space.
They couldn't wait any longer!
Send Starliner home empty, then pick up people with Dragon just to be safe.
Click bait, no new info here! Just bring Starliner home autonomously and then send a falcon 9 dragon to pick up the astronauts. Easy and safe yet none of you TH-camrs have suggested it. Duh!
I think there are some egos at NASA and Boeing while the real issue is not that Starliner can or can't be fixed, but the two lives that are at stake.
Could politics be behind this? Someone in power at NASA that really do not like Elon Musk that are positive to Trump?
@@michaelpettersson4919
No. This isn't about politics - it's about corporate Big-Shots and their egos.
It's about favoritism for a company that has been a long-time contractor for the Dept. of Defense, is too used to bilking the Taxpayers the maximum amount of money it can steal, and has too many friends in high places.
Why - to some people - is EVERYTHING about POLITICS?
So do we get a refund or does the ATM (American Taxpayer Money) get wasted again by the big corporations?
VERY DISAPPOINTED in your recent rush to CLICK BAIT. You title, as you used to do, about actual new events or news, then present old events or old news with a "back down" disclaiming statement or question. Or WORSE a compilation of re-edited clips that aren't even tied togeyher well or are redundant. If you have nothing NEW, say THAT up front or just don't post.
NOTHING IN THIS POST is new or even different from the material previously presented. STOP WASTING OUR TIME!
The only reason I stop by anymore is to vent on Boeings incompetence...the channel sucks !!
I know, right? Soon after I started watching this, I felt like I was experiencing a bad case of déjà vu!
I say it is time to figure out rescue missions. Twice, now, we have had major failures, Apollo 13 and Columbia. Once, they managed to hold it together and get back. You think accidents are not going to happen again?
they should ask the entire astronaut corps to decide if they should use the starliner for the return, include the retirees too . . . if they think it's too dangerous to use a flawed spacecraft then just don't.
i know that astronauts have the biggest, brassiest balls but they are also realists and, i hope, wouldn't put two of their own at unnecessary risk.
When the beancounters took over from the engineers at Boeing, the company began to fail. DEI completed the end.
Boeing's new CEO will change this! Do you think so?
Testing those thrusters while docked on the spacestation could alter its attitude. This should teach Boeing that simulations aren't enough. All the testing being done now should have been done long before sending it to space with a crew. Dump the junk and send for Dragon.
They barely got to the space station, there is no way I would put my life on coming back on the Starlimper! !
Astronauts new slogan...... if it's boeing, I aint going, prayers for the 2 people
They need to let the star liner try go empty so it lets no astronaut. This is my opinion.
Bring them back with the Dragon and attempt to bring back the Starliner unmanned.
Yep get them home before anything else goes wrong
Yes, that has been my thinking. Dragon ride for the crew and bring Starliner back in auto mode. Save the data and figure it out before sending another one into space.
Blue origin can't get it up .. Boeing can't get it down .. are they on Viagra ??
Boeing needs a complete change of management.
Boeing has announced the new CEO! Will it be a turning point? What do you think?
Boeing is experiencing QUALITY CONTROL issues in all divisions, since bean counters and "professional" managers took over top corporate management positions. The luster of Boeing has dulled and is fading fast. If they don't reverse course soon, it is highly likely Boeing won't make it to 2040 or even 2030! They are failing in QUALITY in industries that demand the highest standards of quality products and services.
And in 10-15 years we're going to fly planes made in China. I don't see Boeing coming out of this situation unless massive changes in the leadership.
How hard was it for Boeing to build an upgraded rip off of the Apollo capsule from the 60's? And the debacle of the 737 Max??? Let Boeing fail.
Stayliner, Stuckliner, Scrapliner!
Anyone posting and narrating videos about space and space vehicles, should have at the very least, a rudimentary understanding of the orbital physics involved in a de-orbit and stop spreading "folk lore". Objects entering our atmosphere at extreme velocities DO NOT heat up from FRICTION!!!!! Objects heat up from compression of the air, not friction. The same way ignition in a diesel engine is provided by the heat of high compression....the air in front of a speedy object heats up. Please, let's not perpetuate commonly held lies.
Finally !! A correct educated description to the heat buildup when an object enters the atmosphere...It's not gd friction !! Thank You !!
NASA's commercial crew programme manager Steve Stich must be held accountable if anything goes wrong with the helium leak on Starliner because he is always delaying any alternate ways to bring the astronauts back to Earth.
This time it can't be postponed anymore because crew 9 needs a place to docking.
Steve Stich is Boeing's "paid boy" to say what they tell him to say...
@@ltdees2362 that explains a lot
@@alphatech4966 need a place to dock, not docking. Why aren’t you addressing your Clickbait issues brought up by multiple posters
Easy solution! Send Dragon to retrieve astronauts , and try and land Starliner Empty, one way or the other, we would either have had alive astronauts, or NOT!
American has HOMELESS problem even in the ISS 😂😂
It's easy for Stich to be confident when it's not his butt several hundred miles above the planet.
Steve is confident that the astronauts they delivered to the ISS are not in immediate danger, but has no confidence as to how they can get them back, except to say that it should OK.
Boeing still trying to save face>It's not working!
Starliner will never be ready.
The main issues with Starliner will never be fixed
Somehow they are forced to do 6 launches under contract with Nasa, otherwise they will have to pay the contract if they cancel
Boeing's aircrafts are unreliable due to corner cutting
because of this?
Start financially punishing Boeing instead of expecting the Feds to absorb the costs. If Boeing knew Starliner had these problems before launch, they should be liable for costs incurred.
Is NASA footing the bill for all this testing, or is Boeing? Seeing that Boeing received more for they're commercial contract than SpaceX, has NASA been footing the bill to fix SpaceX's few problems?
Boeing have been left in the dust as it relates to the many successful missions that SpaceX has accomplished so far with better tech. Bezos should stick with what they do well; building planes and military equipment. The company need to get their heads out of their butts and let SpaceX go to the ISS and rescue the two astronauts before it's too late to do so. On the flip side, IF Starliner is so safe for the astronauts to return, then why are they dragging their heels while attempting to save face with studies on this or that and not back on earth?! They are full of wishful thinking and self-reliance when it isn't necessary. I've noticed Jeff Bezos is unwilling to admit he and his team are over their heads in this field.
Yet another click bait title, time to unsubscribe.
Story correction.
Yes Boring DID KNOW ABOUT THE HELIUM LEAK AND SAID IT WOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM
How can it bring them home safely in an emergency but not on a regular return trip. Makes no sense. The “emergency” is basically a Hail Mary I hope it works.
All this same same old no news
Its not a problrm to get them home but to get them home alive.
Manually flying causes excessive stress on the thrusters tells me that the capsule isn't and never will be safe for humans but rather autonomous resupply.
That what happen when accounts run engineering firm. When it comes to management, no performance metrics can replace personal subject/matter expertise.
Boeing has lost its expertise.
Elon... PLEASE... PLEASE....
... Call this part of Space X "International Rescue" and name all your ships "Thunderbird X" starting, of course... with "Thunderbird 7" to rescue the Boeing crew.
Would Boeing CEO fly in it?
if starliner is over, Boeing space division will be over. Stakes are high 😂😂
Boeing Fail across the board .. Commercial Airplane Fail .. Space Missio Fail .. Defense Fail. And Still got $$$ and gov't contract ?
I'm unsubscribing. Once again, you are being deceptive. This time it's "Boeing Starliner is OVER!"
Same
I'm tired of the click bait too
After yet another clickbait title I'm giving thumbs down and do not recommend channel
They'd need to pay me more than my weight in gold to come back on that piece of space junk!
I don't see the crisis.
I believe SpaceX has a scheduled launch to the ISS in a couple of weeks.
Bring Starliner back without a crew, to see if the thrusters work. Consider it a test. I don't this should necessarily mean the end of Starliner, space is hard and Boeing is learning.
Starliner crew gets an extra month or two in space. They're astronauts. Aren't they enjoying this experience?
Bring Starliner's crew back in Crew Dragon. Doesn't it usually fly with a couple of empty seats?
I'm sure this is oversimplification.
My BS meter now looks like a Boca Chica launch pad ……
ALL of these Tests and Evaluations are supposed to happen BEFORE being submitted for service !! 😮
I don't think you want to @1:40 keep a fueled spacecraft on standby. Fueling up doesn't take anywhere near as long as it does to prep a vehicle. I wonder if it's even possible to keep a vehicle on standby, since several things such as the FTS have a very short lifespan and need to be inspected/replaced when they expire. Also the shape of the return capsule is designed to make it "self-orienting" @5:50, requiring only correct orientation at atmospheric insertion. The computers are in the return capsule, there is not "vital information" @6:39 in the service module - what's in there is all the bits that the engineers would love to get a look at to see why it broke.
NASA should be concerned. Starliner is a lemon 🍋
Boeing seems lost in dei land
NASA needs to sue Boeing for violating their contract.. 5 billions dollars and this is all Boeing offers up..
Remember that it's paid in milestones. NASA has not paid out the full contract value or even close at this point. NASA also did not pay anything for the OFT-2 mission that Boeing had to fly.
For me the best thing for NASA to do is tell Beoing to bring the Starliner back - crewless. The crew will then go on a newly launched Dragon and return to Earth.
You read my mind exactly , WHAT IS BEOUNG AND NASA TRYING TO DO , KILL SOME MORE ASTRONAUTS ???
They would of never let Space x do this !!!!!
Total clickbait
Keep a fueled rocket on standby? Nah. That's one of the least time-consuming parts of getting Dragon and Falcon 9 ready.
And, um... while I love all things rockets, I am not a rocket expert.
It doesn't take that long to fuel the falcon 9, 1 hour 5 mins.
Prepare for emergencies use SpaceX
They need to use dragon to make sure the team gets home safely
Like elon said too many managers within the Boeing space team. And lots of old engineers😂
That's not a funny "joke," and I'm certain Musk did NOT denigrate the skills of "old Engineers" - he has many of the best of them working for him. Old engineers are good engineers - it's a field where EXPERIENCE DOES MATTER.
The problem isn't "old engineers," the problem is that they let go many of them, and replaced them with MBA's who were more intent on turning the company upside down to empty its pockets into the hands of people like their new CEO - who got a raise this year: DOUBLE his salary from last year, as he was restructuring the company to farm out projects like "Starliner" piecemeal, to various subcontractors - and now they are utterly confused about why they don't know what's wrong, or how to fix it, as new problems continue to crop up. This is what happens when competent engineers are no longer directly designing, and Quality-Control checking, their own, internal work.
@@art.is.life.eternal for me all about boeing now become a joke and good for stand up comedy material😝
Let starliner come back uncrewed as a proof of concept for reentry. Put 2 extra seats on the Crew-9 dragon and bring the starliner crew safely back to earth.
Your last few comments were RIDICULOUS: "Boeing should help SpaceX develop blah-blah?"
Why, in the name of whatever, do you think that SpaceX needs BOEING, of all companies, to "help" iot with ANYTHING? They are so far ahead of Boeing in the development of rocket engines and spacecraft, it would be like a Space Engineer asking a High-School kid for help. Or did you say that NASA should help SpaceX? That, too, is absurd.
The way you phrased that statement ( around 00:12:36 ) left it completely unclear what you meant - read the script again; you'll understand.
probably a misrepresentation from me! i will correct that!
What a waste of time.... NO new information, and that thumbnail is click bait. You wasted 20 minutes of my life I can never get back.
U can get it back by not watching the next misleading video. Here is hoping you break even🍺
I wouldn’t want to be someone coming back to earth in it regardless
Gives a new meaning to the phrase flying coffin
I feel scared🥲
Trash it, give Elon more funding to build more dragons
The plight of the astranauts should be paramount. I advise using SpaceX to rescue the astranauts safely as soon as possible.
Boeing hires based on skin colour and sexual identity.
They sent them even when their knew there are problems
Boeing and NASA should be sued !
As long as Bill Nelson is in charge of NASA nothing will change.
If those brave astronauts try to return in the Boeing Starliner and it hits the atmosphere at the wrong attitude they will die,! Undocking Starliner uncrewed and having it do an automated return. Is the only way to see if it will burn up. This will protect the astronaut's lives. Starliner has a price tag, human life does not. Using the dragon for a rescue vehicle is a no-brainer.
the more distant in time the original German Engineers become, the more scruffy the official US Space effort becomes.
I sure hope the crapsile doesn't come detached and float into interstellar space through the eons
Too low in Earth's orbit. The pull of the Earth and drag of the atmosphere will pull it back to ground zero.
Stop lying in your thumbnails. Paving the channel!
As safety minded NASA is I was surprised that they decided to launch given the problems discovered on the ground. I wonder who got a pay out and how much. Something smells fishy.
By the itme Starliner gets certified to carry a human crew again there will not be enough time for Starliner to complete 6 missions to the ISS before NASA gives ISS to SpaceX for demolition.
We landed men on the moon because human input was still a respected resource. Now we are drowning in an out of control mess of mindless automation too complicated to control.
Very repetitive of previous videos.
If I were one of the people who were sent to the spacestation I would be very afraid of the spaceliner to be safely 🙏 returned to earth and not die trying.
If it's Boeing, I'm not going. Elon save the astronauts
Never go full Angry Astronaut
Not quite correct. SpaceX does heavy modeling and sim as well, the difference is that SpaceX is willing to invest in test articles, sacrificial if necessary, in order test out the hardware and software against their models. Boeing will not spend that money as their contract cost is already significantly higher than SpaceX's without the test articles.
Tell Boeing they can keep their capsule, meanwhile, save rhe astronauts!
Give ULA a cost plus(100%) contract to save Starliner because they didn't have enough money on hard bid to get there.( Cost over twice as Dragon, to fail.)
Started off with a very misleading statement. Not going to watch the rest of the video. Thumbs down.
Boeing's products may be failing but I bet their DEI programs are the top priority and doing well.
The "more testing" is so much BS. Unless the orbiting team can disassemble the service module whilst at the ISS then the testing is pretty uninformative. Bring 'em home.
Really don't appreciate the bogus click bait title of this video; it doesn't encourage me to watch future videos from this channel.