I have been watching your reviews for a while now and have realized you have ‘the gift of eloquence’ - never let that go! There are subtle details to absorb everytime I rewatch your reviews, which is very satisfying. Thank you !
I love the Nimbus 25, use them for my +2hr easy runs. What makes them perfect for me, is that, when i finish my workout I’m not sore at all. So, ill kill my 25s this year, and go for the 26s in a heartbeat.
Depends for what purpose.. For running IMHO there is no better shoe than Adidas Takumi Sen 8-9, if you do not have wide foot.. Nothing come close for "Energy Return".. HOKA Carbon X, not bad, but nowhere near.. It's like PRO against casual.. Adidas rules.. Just my 2c.
I was alternating the Deviate Nitro 2 and the Nimbus 25 until I realized I just like the Deviate Nitro 2 better for every type of run. Nimbus is going to work. :)
I’ve been diagnosed as a stability runner by all and found this more stable than the kayano - the heel was clunky and my forefoot collapsed more in the kayano where the nimbus is the most comfortable stable shoe I’ve ever worn at the forefoot
Stoked for this shoe -- the 25s are probably my favorite max cushion shoe of all time, sounds like the updates are pretty good. Can't wait to get them! Love the nails btw :)
Glad to know that the Gel-Nimbus 26 middlesole is a little less ultra soft so the shoes can be more versatile. The Asics Gel-Nimbus 25 was the most comfortable shoes I ran last year ,but the extreme softness of the foam made these them my slowest shoes I had in 2023. For a comparison, later in the year I got the Nike invincible 3 that I also loved , but they had/have a very hard middlesole when compared to the Gel-Nimbus 25 . Anyways, I'm trying to find a max cushioning, for me, that is more of a middle ground between the Nimbus and the Invincible 3 ( a bit too fast this one) and the NB 1080 V 13 was not a fast shoes that I thought it would be, but they are definitely a bit less clunky them the slow motion running feeling of the Gel-Nimbus 25 gave me.
Got too distracted by 💅. Also I’m really glad they kept the pull tab design where it’s part of the back heel unlike those that sit below and sewn on. Works like a shoe horn for those who never untie or redo the laces 😎
Great review! Been waiting for this. I know I've commented before that the 25 has been treating me so well and I'm on my second pair (got them on sale for under $100 too). As someone who's injury prone and tried many popular shoes on the market, I keep coming back to my Nimbus. I may have to keep buying them but would love to try the 26 at some point.
The Gel Nimbus 25 gotta be my favorite running shoes in my running shoes rotation list, sometime i just want a super easy run besides it fit my foot just perfect, nice review Ko ❤
Bought the 25 in the wrong size last year and missed my return window due to travel. I’ll probably sell them and pick up the 26. I like what you mentioned about being able to pick up the pace in them better.
That subtle added midsole firmess of the 26th version is what actually made me choose it over the 25th. But overall, either of the two versions (25 and 26) will be good.
Another great review as always. Really interesting how shoe companies are tweaking back and forth between cushion and firmness each iteration trying to find the sweat spot. Hope you have great winter runs and watch out for ice!
Good Review Just got my pair of Nimbus 26, thank you Asics Rep. look forward to trying them. At first want to try to Brooks Glycerin 21 (that’ll be next). Like Good Cushion shoes especially being a heel striker Be safe and Take care
There are so many good shoes out now, including discounted shoes from the previous 2 years, that I find it increasingly more difficult to justify paying full MSRP for new shoes
Did ASICS address the aggressive taper of the toebox that created fit issues for so many people? Also, did they the fix weirdly long / intrusive toe bumper?
I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the issues you mentioned. You may wish to refer to a different reviewer who experienced a similar issue or try on the shoe for yourself.
Heyyy! This isn't the TS10 review I was expecting. LOL. I'm not a fan of the max cush genre in general. There's no situation where I'd reach for a heavy, energy vampire of a max cush shoe instead of a supertrainer. That said, I loved my N25 as a daily walking shoe. Anyway. Love to see all the wear on the bottom of your DN2! And I guess chapter breaks are so 2023? Happy first review of the year!
I have the Nimbus stability cousin, Kayano 30. For me, the Kayano 30 are nowhere near squishy for a sole that thick. I don’t know if it’s because of the added stability profile or other factors. And it’s pretty heavy, too. Bought another shoes for my daily run, Hoka Rincon 3. Very light, yet surprisingly more squishy than the Kayano 30. Although sadly not stable enough for my overpronating flat feet.
I have flat flat too 🥲 but I'm confused about buying the nimbus 26 or kayano 31. Does the kayano really good for flat feet? I tried the nimbus 26, and it was surprisingly good.
I discuss these two shoes specifically in this video. if that wasn't enough, then you're going to have to give me some more context so I can have an idea on how I should elaborate
@@kofuzi i kinda Hoka Clifton Fans. Usage for daily run, 6 - 13 miles / run. My weight 171 lb and height 6 inch. Basically i do like the cushion of those two, but which one is more durable and easier to fit in, if previously hoka clifton user? So i dont need to adapt anymore. Thank Kofuzi, cheers from Indonesia 🇲🇨🇲🇨
Ko what do you mean with the 1080? Was the v12 considered Max cushioned? Wasn't that the role of the More v4? If anything from what I've seen v13 is more max cushioned than previous versions of the 1080.
A1. yes A2. also yes. A3. I cannot comment on what you've seen. All I can tell you is what I experienced. Feel free to watch my review video of the 1080 if you have further questions.
Honestly most of the yearly running shoe updates are good only for getting previous model on cheep - otherwise most of those updates are only pushed by markering ..
It depends on the brand too. Like Saucony, there was no point buying a Ride 16 when the Ride 15 was the exact same shoe with a slightly inferior upper, so unless the upper was a nightmare for you, what's the point? At least in the 17 they've made significant changes increasing the stack and using an entirely different midsole. Whether you end up loving it or hating it, at least it's different enough to distinguish itself from previous models and justify any decision to buy the newest version. It depends on the brand and model, how significant the changes are, for sure.
I've been eyeing 25 since the get go. This makes me want to get the 25 even more, but everytime I try on the 25 I'm not wowed. I prefer the feel of something like the 1080v13. Squishy soft. I may just have to buy the 25 as a walker, they look so nice.
if it doesn't suit you, I wouldn't force it. not every shoe is for every runner, but we do fortunately live in a time where there does seem to be a good option for every runner
Just a general comment: I never understood why shoe companies never state the best use-case for their shoes. Sure, they categorise whether it's neutral or stability shoe, but they never state (on the box) each shoe as either best for daily-training, or tempo, or max-cushion, etc. I find it odd that they leave this kind of critical information out. What are your thoughts on this, Kofuzi?
Working in running specialty, I have an educated guess as to why. If you get too specific with the use-case the only thing you can potentially do is pigeon-hole your shoe into a narrow category and lose the sale. When customers come to us, we ask them questions and based on the feedback genuinely try to match them with the best shoes for the uses they describe, but if a customer comes in looking very specifically for a particular model and asks us if it can do such and such, as long as it isn't a terrible fit for the intended use, we're not going to talk them out of it just because we might have a shoe we personally like better for what they describe. You want the Clifton for daily training but want to mix in some tempo runs occasionally? I'd reach for the Novablast myself, but I'm not going to tell you you're wrong to want to use the Clifton that way. If you listened to my preferences, you might hate the Novablast for the same use. Look at the Endorphin Speed, for instance. The midfoot and heel platform was really narrow on the first 2 versions, and so for some people it was strictly a speed-work and budget racer, often heel strikers or people who have fairly significant stability needs. It's not a shoe they can use as a daily trainer. For others, the Endorphin Speed series has been a daily training dream come true. There are people who, despite the stability improvements on the 3s, still cannot use it as anything but a speed work shoe, and others who've found the changes actually knocked it out of race day consideration. Why as a brand would you pigeon-hole your shoes when everyone knows YMMV? At least with surface (road/trail) and gait type (neutral/stability) these are more predictable than how a person will perceive the shoe and which types of runs they'll like them for. Most of the time that people are looking at these shoes in-person there's a run specialty employee, usually a runner themselves, who can walk them through it. Whether the Endorphin Speed would work as a daily trainer for somebody is a matter of asking them questions and getting to understand their running experience. How could you, if you're Saucony, put "daily trainer" or "tempo shoe" on the box as some universal standard for your shoes when you don't know the specifics of the person looking at them? All you can really do is note what type of running the shoes were designed with in mind, which is often what brands do on their product pages on their sites for customers who are looking online instead of in run specialty stores. You'd also be surprised how individual "max cushion" can be perceived, even though you'd think that a significant difference in the listed stack heights would be nearly universally felt in favor of the more highly stacked shoe. We regularly get customers who think that a much lower stack is more cushioned than shoes that we'd consider max cushion. We've had at least a couple of customers tell us how the 860v13 feels "more cushioned" than the Gel-Kayano 30, for example, or how the Ghost feels more cushioned than the Clifton. This usually just means that a shoe is more comfortable to the customer, and who are we to argue with comfort? We don't tell them they're wrong unless they ask if it's actually more cushioned.
Adding to my point about density, keep in mind that it's not the Nimbus 26, but the Gel-Nimbus 26. That gel adds a lot of density, and the point of density is to "absorb shock" (a marketing-friendly way of saying it deadens impact) which comes at the expense of energy return (less energy is being loaded through the natural spring of your achilles and returned to the leg). The much airier Novablast has significantly more energy return despite being the same midsole and stack height. The Novablast is an extremely versatile shoe, but if you need to shuffle and really spare the legs, those true recovery days, that's where the Gel-Nimbus 26 will come in. Sounds like it'll be a bit more versatile than just this, but this is the main difference.
I wouldn't say "never". I still keep a pair of my all-time favourite shoe (probably the most beautiful running shoe ever produced) - the NIKE Flyknit Racer, and when you peek inside, on the insole with big, bold letters it reads: RACING. So yeah - NIKE used to label their race-day models, I don't think they do it anymore though.
I have many thoughts on it. I spoke about it for a couple minutes on yeaterday’s livestream. I think it’s ultimately something that driven by people worried about sales and not people worried about making great shoes
My experience, 5'9" 180 lbs. I have flat feet and need a touch of stability, but most stability shoes feel super clunky. The nimbus 25 was a good shoe, but after about 30-45 minutes on feet I started to have a little bit of pain in the arches of my feet. Other than that it was great. The nimbus 26 is just a touch firmer, but still pillowy soft with some pop, but it's also about 3 mm wider in the midfoot and in the heel. This gives just a touch more stability and took care of the pain I was experiencing in my arches. Also, the midfoot and heel lockdown is much better. I recommend spending the extra and get the Nimbus 26 over the 25.
Hi Kofuzi my only issue with the 25, of which I bought 2 pairs!!!, is the toe box feeling too rigid and tight Is there any improvement noticeable in the toebox?
I would love to see a baby nimbus like the same foam underfoot and rubber coverage but maybe a lower stack height version that’s also lighter. Like a nimbus with 33-27mm stack height shoe that like 8.0-9oz would be amazing just amazing. Love the feel underfoot just wish it wasn’t nearly 42mm in the heel
was stuck between the nimbus 25 and 26 and this just confirmed my feeling that i should just stick to the discount and get the 25. espically since the nimbus is going to be my max cushion shoe of choice
Hey, I just got a great deal on the Gel-Nimbus 26 TR. But I can't seem to find any reviews or tests that have been done on the TR version. Do you have any insights in to what I can expect from them? Will it just be the same shoe with rougher outsoles, which might add some weight and feel on foot? Rock on dude!
The Nimbus 25 is still $180 on sale from $209 in Canada. I have a lot of shoes to kill at the moment, but hoping to find them at a better price when it’s time for new shoes. Will probably replace my Clifton 9s with Nimbus 25s in the spring.
Why would you pick this shoe as a forefoot runner? It's heavy and 8mm drop means that more foam is in the heel than the area you are landing on which means that you have to carry more shoe than needed. Triumph has even higher drop and if you need bouncier shoe, you could always get something speedier, lighter and even more bouncy instead. I wish there were more details on breathability. I'll have to wait for Aussies to test the new version to see if it still is an oven for most of the year. I have low instep, normal width feet and I couldn't get a good fit. My big toe would rub on the medial internal lip and changing sizing didn't fix it. Are there any changes to the new model that could fix that?
I have been running for 2 years now with 1:45 HM and 19:56 5K PBs. I started with velocity nitro 2 then deviate nitro 2 as racing shoe. I am targeting sub 90 HM. I am thinking about a pair affordable carbon plate racing shoes. Rocket X is now available in India at ~ 85 USD. Is this going to be a good option, even though it’s an older model?
The X2 has a PEBA foam and is a much more well-liked shoe. If you're looking for a budget carbon plated shoe you could look into the ASICS Magic Speed 3 ($160) though note that the plate is a little more flexible/less aggressive than some of the super shoes and it does not use a super foam (FF Blast+ is still nice and it's what they've used in the Novablast which has decent pop, but it isn't FF Turbo which is why it's available at a budget price). The consensus on the Magic Speed 3 seems to be that people like it for up to half marathons. The other options are going for an older model or tbh the Endorphin Speed 3 with its nylon plate could be enough, and they're comfy over distance. A lot of these super shoes make very marginal differences for those of us who aren't elite and not hitting the target pace ranges that the shoes were designed for.
Hi Kofuzi, what's your standview for a runner who just completed full marathon should I stick with garmin daily recommended workout (if I set HR Garmin put below 140 which is way too low for my normal pace so I need to run even slower than normally I did) or it's ok to just stick with my current running to keep at zone 2-3 and the heart rate will eventually go down the more mileage I go? which method improve my running fitness better than the other?
I have thoughts but this really should be answered by a coach. I’m not saying that you have to hire a coach to answer this question. But someone who has coaching credentials may be able to better direct you
The Metaspeed Sky said $249.99 now that alot for a running shoe but I don't think thats a everyday put on shoe but the Gel-Nimbus 26 is good for the jogger who enjoys jogging and a new experience at the price of $159.99
I guess it’s just me when I say that I tried to really like the nimbus 25…but it needed some response and it didn’t give me any. It was good for walking I’ll say. Thought the 26 would be better, but it’s the same. The 24 to me actually gave me more response.
Thank you for your answer. Looking forward to your review. The outsole makes me skeptical, will be very interesting what’s your take on the outsole for this shoe.
I'm looking for very comfortable sneakers for working and walking on vacation. I bought the more v4 and I'm going to buy the nimbus 26 because of the more discreet color. What other model do you suggest for extreme comfort?
did you find that the upper on the 25s wore away quickly? mine started wearing down after about 500km and now there is a hole in the toe area at about 800km. lets see how the 26s do. thanks
I don't understand how people get 800km out of a shoe. people tell me that they do it, and I believe them. but I personally find it incomprehensible for my foot strike, gait, and running surfaces.
2,255 km on my NIKE Zoom Fly Flyknit, just did a 12K run in them this morning. Legs feel fine, 82 kg , 42 YO runner. The React foam made some unusually durable synergy with the carbon plate, plus upper and outsole show no sign of wear to this day! I don't usually get that much mileage out of a shoe, i.e. the Numbus models get to 1,300-1,500 km before they start killing my legs. OG race flats last me 700-1,000 km before retirement. But 700 km on a Nimbus...man, to me they are brand new & feel mint and extra squishy at that point!@@kofuzi
I do all my running in the Nimbus line. I'd like to get better racing shoes, but I have 4E feet (no, 2E will not work!). Any suggestions for race shoes?
I'm not sure the Nimbus is going to go the full direction of the 1080, but even if it were, I'd say that the novablast 4 is still the novablast 4. I don't think the two shoes are dovetailed. Maybe the Cumulus and the Nimbus are more related. But the Novablast kind of sits out there by itself. A substantial change to the Superblast might cause me to question what corollary changes might be getting pushed to the Novablast. But the Nimbus doesn't do that in my mind.
a bit, but depending on where it is very narrow and squeezes your foot (on top of the foot, at the ankle, across the toes?), it may be something that can be resolved with adjusting lacing. but ultimately, if what you're really asking me is if you should exchange it, exchange it for a bigger size. this shoe also comes in a wide. when it comes to sizing, don't overthink it. my general recommendation is that a slightly big shoe is less unsatisfactory than a slightly small shoe.
Thanks for the interesting video! How many kilometers should I run to test the new Nimbus 26? For easy runs and long runs with the Nimbus 25, I've covered over 700 kilometers, and I'll take them to 800. They are still in good condition with an indestructible tread! I've rotate them with the Hoka Clifton 9, which have reached the end of their life at 700 kilometers... For faster workouts, I use the Hoka Mach X. I plan to buy the Nimbus 26, but I need to decide on the second pair for easy runs to rotate with them. Will the Clifton be released in a new version?
A1. Especially for non-race shoes, I’m of the opinion that a shoe in 2024 shouldn’t need break in. It should be good right out of the box. A2. I don’t know
Maybe it’s because of my weight (around 220) or my easy run pace (around 9:40), but I found the 25 very hard. I’d often end up my long runs (2h+) with aches in my knee and lower foot. I found the Deviate Nitro 2, that I used for everything, to be more comfortable. I think the pace is also important. For @Kozufi an easy pace might be my marathon or half marathon pace, and it makes a big difference. For max cushion, I’m loving the NB More v4
It has always been my opinion that pace is a poor metric to use for categorizing shoes. What you feel at easy effort in a shoe should be relatively similar to what easy effort feels like to me
How would you compare this to the Novablast? If this is leaning into the daily trainer category, wouldn’t the Novablast be a comparable option at just a slightly cheaper price point?
Keep in mind that the Novablast is still significantly lighter (we're talking roughly 1.5oz) in part because its midsole is much less dense (the biggest difference you'll feel trying both on despite both being FF Blast+ eco) and more rockered than the Nimbus. The Novablast is a max cush daily trainer that leans into the tempo category even if it's still more of a daily trainer. Nobody is going to mistake the newest Nimbus for a shoe with the pace versatility that the Novablast has. The Nimbus is very much still going to be a cruiser. The density of the foam plays a key role in the difference. A comparison would be how the Ride 17's upgrade to PWRRUN+ makes it nearly identical to the Triumph 21 (22 will be getting PB) on paper, but the Ride 17 still feels more versatile in pace due to its PWRRUN+ midsole being less dense than the Triumph's, despite the shoes being nearly identical in weight. The slightly lower drop (8mm vs. the Triumph's 10mm which tbh feels even higher than 10) makes it easier to increase cadence, as higher drop shoes tend to induce a slower foot switch. The Nimbus to me, at least in the 25s, very much felt like an 8mm drop, and though the Novas are listed at 8mm, they feel slightly lower the way that 6mm usually feels to me.
K-Thanks for the review. Using only the Superblast and Adios Pro 3 but now starting to get a little sore (legs tired and slight sore but want to get more miles in) would you recommend this or just go with 25 or something else. Was looking to replicate Invincible Run 1&2 feel.
I ranted about this for a while on the livestream today. I think there's a lot of potential factors at play. but ultimately, there are lot of shoes out there for a lot of different preferences
sorry to make you wait, but I have a couple other videos that I'd like to put up first and then there will be some Houston content. and then Takumi Sen. short answer is that there are some changes but it is still great
Considering I'm on a budget and just getting into running, would it be better to go for a mid range shoe from the current year or go for a discounted top of the line shoe from previous years?
I don't feel that stable in the 25, the weight doesn't really make it that enjoyable. Using it in the summer, it just gets heavier soaking up the sweat. I'll have to pass on the 26 since it even gained weight.
I feel another comparison should be the Puma Magnify Nitro 2. Similar easy day shoe, feels closer to the Triumph 20/21, but still has some ride characteristics of the Nimbus 26, and cost is $140.
I haven't tried that one, but I'm always of the opinion that more suitable alternatives exist than what I list. I do not intend for my mentions to be exhaustive
Thank you for the video. I have a question. I am not a runner but i stand a lot and walk for my job. I loved the colour and cushion of nimbus 26. But the upper mesh looks a bit thicker. My feet moisturize a lot. Do you recommend me this pair or another brand and pair. Thank you.
i think to answer that question, i'd have to know what you'd like me to compare the nimbus 26 against. otherwise, i might suggest a more breathable sock, if that is a practical option for your work
@@kofuzi i am tour guide and walking a lot. It is so hot here about 30-40 celcius. I have columbia drain maker iv it s so breathable but its cushion is not good. I have used nike invincible run it has a nice cushion but not breathable as columbia. This asics nimbus 26 looks like nike’s upper mesh so it made me confused. They are expensive shoes in my country so i want to make a good decision. Breathable and max cushion and comfortable for summer
I may be operating on outdated information, but I've always understood shin splints as a matter of fitness. like, it happens when increase volume too much, too soon. and you're body needs a chance to catch up. the remedy is basically time and Advil. (reminder, this is what I learned in the 90s). some shoes that are softer can help, but I probably wouldn't pick a shoe based on the condition. I'd perhaps search out softer surfaces to run on. like, if you normally run on concrete, look for blacktop/tarmac. or if you normally run on tarmac, look for gravel, dirt roads, or grass. and then, also consider Advil. as far as your shoe specific question, the Nimbus is a neutral shoe. the Kayano is a stability shoe. unless you need stability, I would advise against it.
Does it require sizing up half a size? What about the width in the forefoot and the volume inside? My feet are 10.7cm wide and size US 10. should i go for 2e or 4e in this
I'm wondering between Puma DV8 2 - Novablast - Nimbus for my daily trainner, or can do all type of run, Not for race and about 10-21k, Can you give me a suggestions. Thansk from Viet Nam
I spent $60 on the DV2 for my interval runs and $72 on the Nimbus 25 for my easy runs. I live in Malaysia, and the prices are converted to US dollars. I enjoy both shoes a lot; however, I still prefer the Nimbus 24, which is more stable and versatile. do not like Triumph 20, it so soft and unstable on the heel, i sinking in down to bottom and pop up back, weird feel.
Hello Kofuzi, I weigh 300 lbs and just got into running. I can run for a very long time in my zone 2 using Cloud Monsters but my shins kind of hurt. Is this a good shoe for a big boy training for a 10K with shin pain considered?
i just got the 25 for $93 last week and probably my best purchase so far
Wait where?
I got it for much more expensive than that but I think it's still one of my best purchases yet.
@@eddiewang9440 i bought it from local website here in Malaysia
I payed 120
@@uramis00 i would say if you can get it anywhere $130 and below, its cheap enough.
I have been watching your reviews for a while now and have realized you have ‘the gift of eloquence’ - never let that go! There are subtle details to absorb everytime I rewatch your reviews, which is very satisfying. Thank you !
A slight firmer than the 25? That is exactly what i was hoping for the 26! i'm sold
Yup loved to hear it was firmer. Would love if they keep trending that way its what I loved about the nimbus 19
I love the Nimbus 25, use them for my +2hr easy runs. What makes them perfect for me, is that, when i finish my workout I’m not sore at all. So, ill kill my 25s this year, and go for the 26s in a heartbeat.
that's a good plan
What shoe do you use for shorter training runs?
Depends for what purpose.. For running IMHO there is no better shoe than Adidas Takumi Sen 8-9, if you do not have wide foot.. Nothing come close for "Energy Return".. HOKA Carbon X, not bad, but nowhere near.. It's like PRO against casual.. Adidas rules.. Just my 2c.
@@kristanvw1563 Novablast 4 and On Eclipse. Faster ones, and 5k runs, Adidas Takumi 9
@@kristanvw1563 For shorter and faster runs, I use the Takumi Sen 9, normal 1hr runs, Asics Novablast 4, racing Adios Pro 3, or Vaporfly 3.
I was alternating the Deviate Nitro 2 and the Nimbus 25 until I realized I just like the Deviate Nitro 2 better for every type of run. Nimbus is going to work. :)
I’ve been diagnosed as a stability runner by all and found this more stable than the kayano - the heel was clunky and my forefoot collapsed more in the kayano where the nimbus is the most comfortable stable shoe I’ve ever worn at the forefoot
Is the Nimbus good for overpronators?
I loved your Nimbus 25 video and now I'm back to hear about the 26!!!
Stoked for this shoe -- the 25s are probably my favorite max cushion shoe of all time, sounds like the updates are pretty good. Can't wait to get them! Love the nails btw :)
How long do the soles last
25s are now on sale. Can’t see there being a $40-$50 difference. Another great video!
Just got the 25’s ❤️❤️❤️ better not change too much
Glad to know that the Gel-Nimbus 26 middlesole is a little less ultra soft so the shoes can be more versatile. The Asics Gel-Nimbus 25 was the most comfortable shoes I ran last year ,but the extreme softness of the foam made these them my slowest shoes I had in 2023. For a comparison, later in the year I got the Nike invincible 3 that I also loved , but they had/have a very hard middlesole when compared to the Gel-Nimbus 25 . Anyways, I'm trying to find a max cushioning, for me, that is more of a middle ground between the Nimbus and the Invincible 3 ( a bit too fast this one) and the NB 1080 V 13 was not a fast shoes that I thought it would be, but they are definitely a bit less clunky them the slow motion running feeling of the Gel-Nimbus 25 gave me.
try saucony endorphin shift 3
I just bought Nimbus 26. The upper part is very narrow and squeezes my foot. Does it expand and relax over time as you use it?
Got too distracted by 💅. Also I’m really glad they kept the pull tab design where it’s part of the back heel unlike those that sit below and sewn on. Works like a shoe horn for those who never untie or redo the laces 😎
i love the nimbus 25. also jealous of that snow you have
that happened to be the one day of snow we had in December in Illinois. I got lucky that day
@@kofuzi I live in southern Illinois we didn’t get any that stuck down here
We'll all buy this in 11 months when the 27 comes out, just like we did with the 25 😎
Great review! Been waiting for this. I know I've commented before that the 25 has been treating me so well and I'm on my second pair (got them on sale for under $100 too). As someone who's injury prone and tried many popular shoes on the market, I keep coming back to my Nimbus. I may have to keep buying them but would love to try the 26 at some point.
I just bought Nimbus 26. The upper part is very narrow and squeezes my foot. Does it expand and relax over time as you use it?
just tried on and got the 26. game changer for sure running with it . its like running on a pillow
Glad you’re enjoying it!
The Gel Nimbus 25 gotta be my favorite running shoes in my running shoes rotation list, sometime i just want a super easy run besides it fit my foot just perfect, nice review Ko ❤
it just looks beautiful. the colour combo, the shape,
Bought the 25 in the wrong size last year and missed my return window due to travel. I’ll probably sell them and pick up the 26. I like what you mentioned about being able to pick up the pace in them better.
That subtle added midsole firmess of the 26th version is what actually made me choose it over the 25th. But overall, either of the two versions (25 and 26) will be good.
Another great review as always. Really interesting how shoe companies are tweaking back and forth between cushion and firmness each iteration trying to find the sweat spot. Hope you have great winter runs and watch out for ice!
Good Review
Just got my pair of Nimbus 26, thank you Asics Rep. look forward to trying them. At first want to try to Brooks Glycerin 21 (that’ll be next). Like Good Cushion shoes especially being a heel striker
Be safe and Take care
How did the Brooks work out ?
I just bought Nimbus 26. The upper part is very narrow and squeezes my foot. Does it expand and relax over time as you use it?
@@dustydreaverI have a pair of the glycerin 21 and they’re awesome! You just forget they’re on your feet, i rotate the brooks and 2x pairs of nimbus
There are so many good shoes out now, including discounted shoes from the previous 2 years, that I find it increasingly more difficult to justify paying full MSRP for new shoes
it's a great time to be a runner
@@kofuzi Indeed indeed
It's great time to be sneaker head too 😊
not so much for basketball sneakers, bots and resellers are killing it@@tkwasik
Just got these as my first pair of running shoes! Very comfortable.
Happy running!
Love the review, as always, Kofuzi. However, the painted nails are a vibe! Keep up the great energy, sir!
Did you notice a significant difference in grip with the update outsole?
Did ASICS address the aggressive taper of the toebox that created fit issues for so many people? Also, did they the fix weirdly long / intrusive toe bumper?
I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the issues you mentioned. You may wish to refer to a different reviewer who experienced a similar issue or try on the shoe for yourself.
I’m curious about that too!
is the nail paint a certain awareness acknowledgement? just being nosy :)
Heyyy! This isn't the TS10 review I was expecting. LOL. I'm not a fan of the max cush genre in general. There's no situation where I'd reach for a heavy, energy vampire of a max cush shoe instead of a supertrainer. That said, I loved my N25 as a daily walking shoe. Anyway. Love to see all the wear on the bottom of your DN2! And I guess chapter breaks are so 2023? Happy first review of the year!
I forgot to add them
@@kofuzihey should I get the nimbus 26 or 26 tr?
I have the Nimbus stability cousin, Kayano 30. For me, the Kayano 30 are nowhere near squishy for a sole that thick. I don’t know if it’s because of the added stability profile or other factors. And it’s pretty heavy, too. Bought another shoes for my daily run, Hoka Rincon 3. Very light, yet surprisingly more squishy than the Kayano 30. Although sadly not stable enough for my overpronating flat feet.
I have flat flat too 🥲 but I'm confused about buying the nimbus 26 or kayano 31. Does the kayano really good for flat feet? I tried the nimbus 26, and it was surprisingly good.
For Malaysia market, better to choose on Nimbus 26.
Saya guna nimbus 26 mmg best bro❤
@@PanglimaBiru waaahhh. Saya belum ada kesempatan beli Nimbus. Diusahakan tahun ni. 😁
Apa karena cuaca/iklim hot kah?
Just got the 26 for $103 in Amazon
Thanks for the review😊
And where can I get this shirt?
onitsuka
Im so confused which one to buy, 1080 v13 or Nimbus 26?? Please help. Thanks Kofuzi
I discuss these two shoes specifically in this video. if that wasn't enough, then you're going to have to give me some more context so I can have an idea on how I should elaborate
@@kofuzi i kinda Hoka Clifton Fans. Usage for daily run, 6 - 13 miles / run. My weight 171 lb and height 6 inch. Basically i do like the cushion of those two, but which one is more durable and easier to fit in, if previously hoka clifton user? So i dont need to adapt anymore. Thank Kofuzi, cheers from Indonesia 🇲🇨🇲🇨
Ko what do you mean with the 1080? Was the v12 considered Max cushioned? Wasn't that the role of the More v4? If anything from what I've seen v13 is more max cushioned than previous versions of the 1080.
A1. yes
A2. also yes.
A3. I cannot comment on what you've seen. All I can tell you is what I experienced. Feel free to watch my review video of the 1080 if you have further questions.
Honestly most of the yearly running shoe updates are good only for getting previous model on cheep - otherwise most of those updates are only pushed by markering ..
It depends on the brand too. Like Saucony, there was no point buying a Ride 16 when the Ride 15 was the exact same shoe with a slightly inferior upper, so unless the upper was a nightmare for you, what's the point? At least in the 17 they've made significant changes increasing the stack and using an entirely different midsole. Whether you end up loving it or hating it, at least it's different enough to distinguish itself from previous models and justify any decision to buy the newest version. It depends on the brand and model, how significant the changes are, for sure.
is this satire?
I was hoping they updated the tongue. The lockdown I needed caused discomfort where the laces lay.
Try sizing down?
I've been eyeing 25 since the get go. This makes me want to get the 25 even more, but everytime I try on the 25 I'm not wowed. I prefer the feel of something like the 1080v13. Squishy soft. I may just have to buy the 25 as a walker, they look so nice.
if it doesn't suit you, I wouldn't force it. not every shoe is for every runner, but we do fortunately live in a time where there does seem to be a good option for every runner
@kofuzi facts. I do love the look of the 25 though, may pick up that earth day drip as a casual wear.
They take a while to break in and then theyre amazing
Just a general comment: I never understood why shoe companies never state the best use-case for their shoes. Sure, they categorise whether it's neutral or stability shoe, but they never state (on the box) each shoe as either best for daily-training, or tempo, or max-cushion, etc.
I find it odd that they leave this kind of critical information out. What are your thoughts on this, Kofuzi?
Working in running specialty, I have an educated guess as to why. If you get too specific with the use-case the only thing you can potentially do is pigeon-hole your shoe into a narrow category and lose the sale. When customers come to us, we ask them questions and based on the feedback genuinely try to match them with the best shoes for the uses they describe, but if a customer comes in looking very specifically for a particular model and asks us if it can do such and such, as long as it isn't a terrible fit for the intended use, we're not going to talk them out of it just because we might have a shoe we personally like better for what they describe. You want the Clifton for daily training but want to mix in some tempo runs occasionally? I'd reach for the Novablast myself, but I'm not going to tell you you're wrong to want to use the Clifton that way. If you listened to my preferences, you might hate the Novablast for the same use.
Look at the Endorphin Speed, for instance. The midfoot and heel platform was really narrow on the first 2 versions, and so for some people it was strictly a speed-work and budget racer, often heel strikers or people who have fairly significant stability needs. It's not a shoe they can use as a daily trainer. For others, the Endorphin Speed series has been a daily training dream come true. There are people who, despite the stability improvements on the 3s, still cannot use it as anything but a speed work shoe, and others who've found the changes actually knocked it out of race day consideration. Why as a brand would you pigeon-hole your shoes when everyone knows YMMV? At least with surface (road/trail) and gait type (neutral/stability) these are more predictable than how a person will perceive the shoe and which types of runs they'll like them for.
Most of the time that people are looking at these shoes in-person there's a run specialty employee, usually a runner themselves, who can walk them through it. Whether the Endorphin Speed would work as a daily trainer for somebody is a matter of asking them questions and getting to understand their running experience. How could you, if you're Saucony, put "daily trainer" or "tempo shoe" on the box as some universal standard for your shoes when you don't know the specifics of the person looking at them? All you can really do is note what type of running the shoes were designed with in mind, which is often what brands do on their product pages on their sites for customers who are looking online instead of in run specialty stores.
You'd also be surprised how individual "max cushion" can be perceived, even though you'd think that a significant difference in the listed stack heights would be nearly universally felt in favor of the more highly stacked shoe. We regularly get customers who think that a much lower stack is more cushioned than shoes that we'd consider max cushion. We've had at least a couple of customers tell us how the 860v13 feels "more cushioned" than the Gel-Kayano 30, for example, or how the Ghost feels more cushioned than the Clifton. This usually just means that a shoe is more comfortable to the customer, and who are we to argue with comfort? We don't tell them they're wrong unless they ask if it's actually more cushioned.
Adding to my point about density, keep in mind that it's not the Nimbus 26, but the Gel-Nimbus 26. That gel adds a lot of density, and the point of density is to "absorb shock" (a marketing-friendly way of saying it deadens impact) which comes at the expense of energy return (less energy is being loaded through the natural spring of your achilles and returned to the leg). The much airier Novablast has significantly more energy return despite being the same midsole and stack height. The Novablast is an extremely versatile shoe, but if you need to shuffle and really spare the legs, those true recovery days, that's where the Gel-Nimbus 26 will come in. Sounds like it'll be a bit more versatile than just this, but this is the main difference.
I wouldn't say "never". I still keep a pair of my all-time favourite shoe (probably the most beautiful running shoe ever produced) - the NIKE Flyknit Racer, and when you peek inside, on the insole with big, bold letters it reads: RACING. So yeah - NIKE used to label their race-day models, I don't think they do it anymore though.
I have many thoughts on it. I spoke about it for a couple minutes on yeaterday’s livestream. I think it’s ultimately something that driven by people worried about sales and not people worried about making great shoes
My experience, 5'9" 180 lbs. I have flat feet and need a touch of stability, but most stability shoes feel super clunky. The nimbus 25 was a good shoe, but after about 30-45 minutes on feet I started to have a little bit of pain in the arches of my feet. Other than that it was great. The nimbus 26 is just a touch firmer, but still pillowy soft with some pop, but it's also about 3 mm wider in the midfoot and in the heel. This gives just a touch more stability and took care of the pain I was experiencing in my arches. Also, the midfoot and heel lockdown is much better. I recommend spending the extra and get the Nimbus 26 over the 25.
I feel like that makes sense for someone that had the experience you did with the 25
Hi Kofuzi my only issue with the 25, of which I bought 2 pairs!!!, is the toe box feeling too rigid and tight
Is there any improvement noticeable in the toebox?
I would love to see a baby nimbus like the same foam underfoot and rubber coverage but maybe a lower stack height version that’s also lighter. Like a nimbus with 33-27mm stack height shoe that like 8.0-9oz would be amazing just amazing. Love the feel underfoot just wish it wasn’t nearly 42mm in the heel
Yo kofuzi did you stop chaptering your videos? I loved it when I want to quickly rewatch a video.
sometimes I forget
was stuck between the nimbus 25 and 26 and this just confirmed my feeling that i should just stick to the discount and get the 25. espically since the nimbus is going to be my max cushion shoe of choice
Hey, I just got a great deal on the Gel-Nimbus 26 TR. But I can't seem to find any reviews or tests that have been done on the TR version.
Do you have any insights in to what I can expect from them? Will it just be the same shoe with rougher outsoles, which might add some weight and feel on foot?
Rock on dude!
I feel like you are in the best position to answer your questions
Managed to get one for US$118 in 4E as I can’t find the 25 in that version anymore. Primarily will be using for long walks and lots of standing.
Where at?
Sorry, I’m not in the US. Actually started wearing it today. Not too bad
The Nimbus 25 is still $180 on sale from $209 in Canada. I have a lot of shoes to kill at the moment, but hoping to find them at a better price when it’s time for new shoes. Will probably replace my Clifton 9s with Nimbus 25s in the spring.
Love your tshirt. Looks like an Onitsuka Tiger tshirt. Where did you get it?
it was a gift
Why would you pick this shoe as a forefoot runner? It's heavy and 8mm drop means that more foam is in the heel than the area you are landing on which means that you have to carry more shoe than needed. Triumph has even higher drop and if you need bouncier shoe, you could always get something speedier, lighter and even more bouncy instead.
I wish there were more details on breathability. I'll have to wait for Aussies to test the new version to see if it still is an oven for most of the year.
I have low instep, normal width feet and I couldn't get a good fit. My big toe would rub on the medial internal lip and changing sizing didn't fix it. Are there any changes to the new model that could fix that?
because it's comfy
Fair enough :)
If you already have the nimbus 24, which would be the best option for walking in 2025?? The nimbus 25, nimbus or nimbus 27 :)
I have been running for 2 years now with 1:45 HM and 19:56 5K PBs. I started with velocity nitro 2 then deviate nitro 2 as racing shoe. I am targeting sub 90 HM. I am thinking about a pair affordable carbon plate racing shoes. Rocket X is now available in India at ~ 85 USD. Is this going to be a good option, even though it’s an older model?
No, it sucks. It lacks proper good foam. Deviate Nitro will be faster imo. Why not looks at Deviate Elite v1 or v2?
I did not love that shoe
The X2 has a PEBA foam and is a much more well-liked shoe. If you're looking for a budget carbon plated shoe you could look into the ASICS Magic Speed 3 ($160) though note that the plate is a little more flexible/less aggressive than some of the super shoes and it does not use a super foam (FF Blast+ is still nice and it's what they've used in the Novablast which has decent pop, but it isn't FF Turbo which is why it's available at a budget price). The consensus on the Magic Speed 3 seems to be that people like it for up to half marathons.
The other options are going for an older model or tbh the Endorphin Speed 3 with its nylon plate could be enough, and they're comfy over distance. A lot of these super shoes make very marginal differences for those of us who aren't elite and not hitting the target pace ranges that the shoes were designed for.
Thanks. The comments help quite a lot now in deciding my next shoes
What do you think the sizing is like compared to the 25s? Thanks!
Why don’t more brands start using “hybrid grip” outsoles? Makes total sense
I think a lot do. It’s just not always given a trade name
I like hard responsive shoes due to my XC\TF experience. Spikes hurt and I love it. Why are all shoes so mushy and sloppy now?
The better outsole makes these better than the 25. Longer lasting and more grippy for a more responsive run
Did anyone find the upper a bit tight. Does it stretch to your foot after a few runs?
I didn't like the nimbus 25 when I tried it on in store and on a treadmill, but for 130 I'll see if I can try them again.
Great review. Would you recommend 1080v13 or nimbus 26 for heavier runner (210lbs) for 5-10km runs 3-4x a week?
Hi Kofuzi, what's your standview for a runner who just completed full marathon should I stick with garmin daily recommended workout (if I set HR Garmin put below 140 which is way too low for my normal pace so I need to run even slower than normally I did) or it's ok to just stick with my current running to keep at zone 2-3 and the heart rate will eventually go down the more mileage I go? which method improve my running fitness better than the other?
I have thoughts but this really should be answered by a coach. I’m not saying that you have to hire a coach to answer this question. But someone who has coaching credentials may be able to better direct you
Paid 110€ for the nimbus 25 coming next week, I hope it’s a great and lasting shoe cz it’s the most I have spent on a daily trainer
I need bouncy max cushioning in the ball of foot area for running. Can you suggest some names in x-wide options pls?
I am not familiar with which shoes are available in wide
Prefer the look of the 25, the 26 looks like a dad shoe
In person, the 26 look a lot more refined.
maybe because if the color he picked 😅
The Metaspeed Sky said $249.99 now that alot for a running shoe but I don't think thats a everyday put on shoe but the Gel-Nimbus 26 is good for the jogger who enjoys jogging and a new experience at the price of $159.99
Which do you think is better, the adidas supernova rise or the asics nimbus 26?
I guess it’s just me when I say that I tried to really like the nimbus 25…but it needed some response and it didn’t give me any. It was good for walking I’ll say. Thought the 26 would be better, but it’s the same. The 24 to me actually gave me more response.
thanks for the feedback!
@kofuzi When do we get the review of Cumulus 26?
It keeps getting bumped. Probably not until May
Thank you for your answer. Looking forward to your review. The outsole makes me skeptical, will be very interesting what’s your take on the outsole for this shoe.
I've bought 4 pairs of gel nimbus 26. They all break at the mash on top of the fingers in a months time. Too expensive but comfy as hell.
I'm looking for very comfortable sneakers for working and walking on vacation. I bought the more v4 and I'm going to buy the nimbus 26 because of the more discreet color. What other model do you suggest for extreme comfort?
Cloud ☁️ are good
In my opinion the best Max cushion shoe is More V4. I love it for my easy recovery runs
No question about it, more 4 is great.
@@Amen20 Amazing!! A need for a marathoner
did you find that the upper on the 25s wore away quickly? mine started wearing down after about 500km and now there is a hole in the toe area at about 800km. lets see how the 26s do. thanks
I don't understand how people get 800km out of a shoe. people tell me that they do it, and I believe them. but I personally find it incomprehensible for my foot strike, gait, and running surfaces.
@@kofuzi fair enough. i like to push mine to 1200 to get maximum value.
@@peterbayvel-zayats7172 I'm sure your legs appreciate your frugality
2,255 km on my NIKE Zoom Fly Flyknit, just did a 12K run in them this morning. Legs feel fine, 82 kg , 42 YO runner. The React foam made some unusually durable synergy with the carbon plate, plus upper and outsole show no sign of wear to this day! I don't usually get that much mileage out of a shoe, i.e. the Numbus models get to 1,300-1,500 km before they start killing my legs. OG race flats last me 700-1,000 km before retirement. But 700 km on a Nimbus...man, to me they are brand new & feel mint and extra squishy at that point!@@kofuzi
I do all my running in the Nimbus line. I'd like to get better racing shoes, but I have 4E feet (no, 2E will not work!). Any suggestions for race shoes?
Altra Torin 7
If the Nimbus 26 is becoming a daily trainer, where does the Novablast 4 fit in?
I'm not sure the Nimbus is going to go the full direction of the 1080, but even if it were, I'd say that the novablast 4 is still the novablast 4. I don't think the two shoes are dovetailed. Maybe the Cumulus and the Nimbus are more related. But the Novablast kind of sits out there by itself. A substantial change to the Superblast might cause me to question what corollary changes might be getting pushed to the Novablast. But the Nimbus doesn't do that in my mind.
Hi, is this show durable for a heavy runner (260lbs). Concerned the sole will collapse
@kofuzi I just bought Nimbus 26. The upper part is very narrow and squeezes my foot. Does it expand and relax over time as you use it?
a bit, but depending on where it is very narrow and squeezes your foot (on top of the foot, at the ankle, across the toes?), it may be something that can be resolved with adjusting lacing. but ultimately, if what you're really asking me is if you should exchange it, exchange it for a bigger size. this shoe also comes in a wide.
when it comes to sizing, don't overthink it. my general recommendation is that a slightly big shoe is less unsatisfactory than a slightly small shoe.
Thanks for the interesting video!
How many kilometers should I run to test the new Nimbus 26?
For easy runs and long runs with the Nimbus 25, I've covered over 700 kilometers, and I'll take them to 800. They are still in good condition with an indestructible tread! I've rotate them with the Hoka Clifton 9, which have reached the end of their life at 700 kilometers...
For faster workouts, I use the Hoka Mach X.
I plan to buy the Nimbus 26, but I need to decide on the second pair for easy runs to rotate with them.
Will the Clifton be released in a new version?
A1. Especially for non-race shoes, I’m of the opinion that a shoe in 2024 shouldn’t need break in. It should be good right out of the box.
A2. I don’t know
Maybe it’s because of my weight (around 220) or my easy run pace (around 9:40), but I found the 25 very hard. I’d often end up my long runs (2h+) with aches in my knee and lower foot.
I found the Deviate Nitro 2, that I used for everything, to be more comfortable.
I think the pace is also important. For @Kozufi an easy pace might be my marathon or half marathon pace, and it makes a big difference.
For max cushion, I’m loving the NB More v4
wait till u try the superblast
It has always been my opinion that pace is a poor metric to use for categorizing shoes. What you feel at easy effort in a shoe should be relatively similar to what easy effort feels like to me
How would you compare this to the Novablast? If this is leaning into the daily trainer category, wouldn’t the Novablast be a comparable option at just a slightly cheaper price point?
Keep in mind that the Novablast is still significantly lighter (we're talking roughly 1.5oz) in part because its midsole is much less dense (the biggest difference you'll feel trying both on despite both being FF Blast+ eco) and more rockered than the Nimbus. The Novablast is a max cush daily trainer that leans into the tempo category even if it's still more of a daily trainer. Nobody is going to mistake the newest Nimbus for a shoe with the pace versatility that the Novablast has. The Nimbus is very much still going to be a cruiser.
The density of the foam plays a key role in the difference. A comparison would be how the Ride 17's upgrade to PWRRUN+ makes it nearly identical to the Triumph 21 (22 will be getting PB) on paper, but the Ride 17 still feels more versatile in pace due to its PWRRUN+ midsole being less dense than the Triumph's, despite the shoes being nearly identical in weight. The slightly lower drop (8mm vs. the Triumph's 10mm which tbh feels even higher than 10) makes it easier to increase cadence, as higher drop shoes tend to induce a slower foot switch. The Nimbus to me, at least in the 25s, very much felt like an 8mm drop, and though the Novas are listed at 8mm, they feel slightly lower the way that 6mm usually feels to me.
No
K-Thanks for the review. Using only the Superblast and Adios Pro 3 but now starting to get a little sore (legs tired and slight sore but want to get more miles in) would you recommend this or just go with 25 or something else. Was looking to replicate Invincible Run 1&2 feel.
If you want an invincible, buy the invincible.
I’ve already discussed in this video whether to get the 25 or the 26
Can someone explain the pink nail polish?
His daughter's work 😉
Can someone explain the push towards daily trainers over max cushion? I like squish
I ranted about this for a while on the livestream today. I think there's a lot of potential factors at play. but ultimately, there are lot of shoes out there for a lot of different preferences
This is all good but bring on the Sen 10 Review please and thank you 😂
sorry to make you wait, but I have a couple other videos that I'd like to put up first and then there will be some Houston content. and then Takumi Sen.
short answer is that there are some changes but it is still great
Currently running in the superblasts, however sold out everywhere. Need to update my shoes looking at these. Are they comparable?
No
Considering I'm on a budget and just getting into running, would it be better to go for a mid range shoe from the current year or go for a discounted top of the line shoe from previous years?
Always go with flagships from prior year if you are looking to save some money. But keep in mind not all updates are mild
I don't feel that stable in the 25, the weight doesn't really make it that enjoyable. Using it in the summer, it just gets heavier soaking up the sweat. I'll have to pass on the 26 since it even gained weight.
I feel another comparison should be the Puma Magnify Nitro 2. Similar easy day shoe, feels closer to the Triumph 20/21, but still has some ride characteristics of the Nimbus 26, and cost is $140.
I haven't tried that one, but I'm always of the opinion that more suitable alternatives exist than what I list. I do not intend for my mentions to be exhaustive
Thank you for the video. I have a question. I am not a runner but i stand a lot and walk for my job. I loved the colour and cushion of nimbus 26. But the upper mesh looks a bit thicker. My feet moisturize a lot. Do you recommend me this pair or another brand and pair. Thank you.
i think to answer that question, i'd have to know what you'd like me to compare the nimbus 26 against.
otherwise, i might suggest a more breathable sock, if that is a practical option for your work
@@kofuzi i am tour guide and walking a lot. It is so hot here about 30-40 celcius. I have columbia drain maker iv it s so breathable but its cushion is not good. I have used nike invincible run it has a nice cushion but not breathable as columbia. This asics nimbus 26 looks like nike’s upper mesh so it made me confused. They are expensive shoes in my country so i want to make a good decision. Breathable and max cushion and comfortable for summer
Hi Kofuzi, I am heel striker and use to have pain in my spin splints. Do you think kayano 31 or nimbus 26 is good for me? Please response thank you
I may be operating on outdated information, but I've always understood shin splints as a matter of fitness. like, it happens when increase volume too much, too soon. and you're body needs a chance to catch up. the remedy is basically time and Advil. (reminder, this is what I learned in the 90s).
some shoes that are softer can help, but I probably wouldn't pick a shoe based on the condition. I'd perhaps search out softer surfaces to run on. like, if you normally run on concrete, look for blacktop/tarmac. or if you normally run on tarmac, look for gravel, dirt roads, or grass.
and then, also consider Advil.
as far as your shoe specific question, the Nimbus is a neutral shoe. the Kayano is a stability shoe. unless you need stability, I would advise against it.
Cool review, the 25 is on for a great price £88
Lovin the t shirt, can’t find it anywhere
is ιτ true that the nimbus 26 tears easily in the front????
Does it require sizing up half a size? What about the width in the forefoot and the volume inside? My feet are 10.7cm wide and size US 10. should i go for 2e or 4e in this
I would go with your usual running shoe size
I'm wondering between Puma DV8 2 - Novablast - Nimbus for my daily trainner, or can do all type of run,
Not for race and about 10-21k,
Can you give me a suggestions.
Thansk from Viet Nam
I got the 25. Tried to run in them once...not a good experience (vs the speed 3s imho)
They are great for walking !!
that makes sense. those are two very different shoes for two very different things, imo
The 25 were the best max cushion shoe I’ve ever had and I’m definitely going to get the 26 now. Thanks for the top notch review!
I spent $60 on the DV2 for my interval runs and $72 on the Nimbus 25 for my easy runs. I live in Malaysia, and the prices are converted to US dollars. I enjoy both shoes a lot; however, I still prefer the Nimbus 24, which is more stable and versatile. do not like Triumph 20, it so soft and unstable on the heel, i sinking in down to bottom and pop up back, weird feel.
Nimbus 24 was very different
Why the nail polish? I started running a few months ago, thanks to your videos. Ive got the nimbus 25 , boston 12, adios pro 3 rotation
@@coolkid8608 I was thinking maybe he has a young daughter that was playing with him
His daughter got a nail polish set for christmas.. ultimate dad sacrifice 😊 he did address it in his livestream.
Could be a leftover new year party thing 😊
I don’t think my feet are wide, I can wear most trainers, but even the 4E x-wide I found was too narrow 😢
Sorry to hear that
@cofuzi Please tell me where i can get that t-shirt your wearing in this video........PLEAAASE!
Onitsuka
Hello Kofuzi, I weigh 300 lbs and just got into running. I can run for a very long time in my zone 2 using Cloud Monsters but my shins kind of hurt. Is this a good shoe for a big boy training for a 10K with shin pain considered?
I think it’s worth looking at
Good daughter help her daddy polish his nails.