The great tax debate: How will GOP fund tax cuts?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 117

  • @Dowskydowsky
    @Dowskydowsky 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    There is no such thing as a republican plan to raise revenue

    • @nickvin7447
      @nickvin7447 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And there doesn't need to be genius.

    • @redfisher5378
      @redfisher5378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nickvin7447 Well, when you're 34T in debt? Yep. Idiot.

    • @nappybiscuit
      @nappybiscuit 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nickvin7447 ha ha I was thinking that same thing. Government is supposed to be a non-profit organization.

    • @nickvin7447
      @nickvin7447 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nappybiscuit Yep, instead they are trying to be big business when they are some of the worst at making money in history.

    • @iCanFlyWatchMe
      @iCanFlyWatchMe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s a good thing

  • @jesuisrobert808
    @jesuisrobert808 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    They can't and won't. Pay off the last tax cut before you float another one.

  • @brahmmauer7437
    @brahmmauer7437 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    They have never actually funded their tax cuts.

    • @user-hf2dr7sh4y
      @user-hf2dr7sh4y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol it's called national debt

    • @jamesklaatu9359
      @jamesklaatu9359 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      One simple look at the tax revenue increase to the treasury and you would have seen it pays for itself. Except for the Green New deal, Inflation reduction act, and the Infrastructure bill. Non of which have produced anything but more inflation. It's the spending stupid.

    • @Wackalacka
      @Wackalacka 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂​@@jamesklaatu9359

    • @ssuwandi3240
      @ssuwandi3240 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump incentivized overseas companies to go home and create jobs. That's one way to fund the cuts

    • @chrischoir3594
      @chrischoir3594 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought Trump lowered the amount of people on welfare/EBT ?

  • @Mostly_bad
    @Mostly_bad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Uh… They won’t fund them.

  • @wayneashley5486
    @wayneashley5486 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    How did they fund the 2017 tax cuts? Umm... #theydidnt

  • @jesuisrobert808
    @jesuisrobert808 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Be the fiscal conservatives you pretend to be. There's a revenue problem if you can't pay for your deficits.
    Pay the deficit from the last tax cuts before you promise more tax cuts. You're endangering our credit rating.

  • @Jilla0559
    @Jilla0559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Extending Trump Taxes will cost the Government 4.6 T and increase the deficit

  • @davehodge4606
    @davehodge4606 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is amazing to me that an expert appears on the show that does not know basic economics... The tax cuts didn't impact revenue as it drove other economic activity and gave Americans back a sizable chunk of their money which fueled consumer spending and improved their lives... The tax revenue is ~25% more now than it was in 2015 ($4.44 trillion to $3.25 trillion) Our government needs to stop the excessive spending unless we have a major issue like Covid. Congress should use basic principles that all financial advisors give to their clients. Live within your means, wipe out your debt, and invest in your future.

  • @zacharyfair6738
    @zacharyfair6738 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We need a real plan to cut back each year and increase tax/revenue each year.... We also need to recognize that investing in healthcare/nutrition from pregnancy to 12yo will prevent children from being dysfunctional adults.

  • @GordonMoat
    @GordonMoat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a similar path that Ireland tried, then failed horribly near the GFC (2008/2009). The “Bond Vigilantes” could put such an idea quickly into peril, as US Treasury auctions in the future would fail to find enough buyers.

  • @kimocoloma4123
    @kimocoloma4123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No tax on tips will forever put Nevada s Red State.

  • @jacobwatson3781
    @jacobwatson3781 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How did the greatest expansion of the US economy happen at a time when taxes were much much higher? How did people have pensions, how did households live off 1 income?

    • @MrMountain707
      @MrMountain707 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WWII left us being the only superpower left standing. Countries started to park their money here in treasuries.

    • @jacobwatson3781
      @jacobwatson3781 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@MrMountain707And we thrived with extremely higher taxes

    • @akp167
      @akp167 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jacobwatson3781Taxes rates were higher but there were many more deductions as well. The government’s revenue was similar to today in terms of % of the economy.
      Not to mention that the federal government was spending the money on the military back in those days. Today it is on social safety programs.

    • @jacobwatson3781
      @jacobwatson3781 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@akp167What does the government spend now of Homeland Security and Military budget now?

  • @vijjreddy
    @vijjreddy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    why we always talk about next ten years, keep it simple, just talk about one year. GOP will fund tax cuts in the usual manner, by printing money..and kicking the can down.. leave it to next administration to manage debt, and they will do the same,leave it to the next sdministration

  • @Kurdt-zk4wt
    @Kurdt-zk4wt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Obama 8 trillion in 8 years. Trump 8 trillion in 4 years

  • @michaelanderson3096
    @michaelanderson3096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tariffs & increase economic activity (Right to Work Legislation).

  • @vincentgiasullo
    @vincentgiasullo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tax cuts don’t cost money, the reason why people say that they do is because the government still spends the same amount with less revenue flowing it. If you want to significantly cut taxes, you must also find a way to cut spending on that which we do not need.

    • @MrMountain707
      @MrMountain707 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They never do that last part though. That would be too politically unpopular.

  • @joshuaburns3167
    @joshuaburns3167 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stop Fn spending and prices will fall......

  • @TinoTM1986
    @TinoTM1986 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reduce government??? Easy answer ?

  • @petegww
    @petegww 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    How many jobs has the federal goverment needlessy added since 2001.... cut government spending on everything

    • @richdilorenzo8145
      @richdilorenzo8145 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is the obvious and correct answer, but somehow the idea of "funding" tax cuts by REDUCING government spending never seems to get much play!! I am of the opinion, after having spent 40 years trying to get things accomplished through government and seeing the bureaucracy continue to "bloat" over every single year without EVER seeing a reduction that fully 1/3 of all government spending could be CUT completely and no one would see any change in the funcionging of goverment. The remaining staffs of all the amazing overlaps on mission would have to work a bit harder. I saw it in California with the "freak out" by government om 1978 after the PEOPLE passed prop 13 freezing in large part property taxes claiming all the disastrous effects it would have on the usual suspects like Fire and Police. IT DID NOT HAPPEN.

    • @jacobwatson3781
      @jacobwatson3781 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, how much you want to cut from Defense Budget, SS, and Medicare?

    • @petegww
      @petegww 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jacobwatson3781 decrease food stamps for young adults and give them to ss recipients, and cut ss and the military budget for sure... one year of no new military spending would save a trillion dollars... and cut a lot of other bs government programs, like all bs research

    • @NewDealDem2187
      @NewDealDem2187 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good thing you werent around to advise FDR

    • @petegww
      @petegww 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NewDealDem2187 FDR sold out Americans to the wealth disparity that exists now, also hurt the black population.

  • @forthdimension686
    @forthdimension686 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tip wages really 😂 going after pennies

  • @brent0708
    @brent0708 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Taxes? Really??? Come on guys the dollar is already dead. Why tax anyone when fiscal policy is broken in America?

  • @Rust_Belt_Capital
    @Rust_Belt_Capital 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Reducing taxes and Regulations actually grows the economy…. You pay off debt by GROWTH not more taxes

    • @teebone2157
      @teebone2157 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're talking about old economics?It doesn't work that way anymore

    • @damonkatos4271
      @damonkatos4271 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trickle down doesn't work. It's proven over and over.

    • @Rust_Belt_Capital
      @Rust_Belt_Capital 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@teebone2157 Just like gravity doesn’t work anymore

    • @james09jr
      @james09jr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re still forgetting the cutting spending part, which is the issue. Doesn’t matter if growth improves while spending simultaneously increases at the same or greater rate. See the budgets from 2017-2020 for prime examples

    • @ssuwandi3240
      @ssuwandi3240 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just shut down Gender Study and Equality and put that money into healthcare such as diabetes research that China has found the cure

  • @matt96920
    @matt96920 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    lol Jesus Christ, this comment section. If you're so incredibly worried about funding government spending, *donate* your remaining untaxed income. If you think the government isn't stealing enough of your money, give it to them voluntarily. Problem solved! No more deficits! You won! Everyone else *was* dumb!

  • @teole6364
    @teole6364 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gov has spending problem. They are the problem. Less money for government, more money for people.

  • @teebone2157
    @teebone2157 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Considering the current debt issue, bidens plan would be better but they have to cut spending on "defense" and some social programs

    • @user-yk5hc4qt1n
      @user-yk5hc4qt1n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      depends on how much a supermajority would spend really

  • @carlnelson8418
    @carlnelson8418 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    End the IRS go to a consumption tax

  • @fredhenry426
    @fredhenry426 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Meat Axe Green & EV crap scams

  • @chiquita683
    @chiquita683 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cut $50 billion to Uke

    • @redfisher5378
      @redfisher5378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump wants to continue giving money to Ukraine. Don't get your hopes up.

  • @SweetToastSugar
    @SweetToastSugar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I no longer want to pay social security and want my money back. Boomers already have the assets and were able to buy their house for a strawberry (last line stolen from a comedian). :)

  • @cryptkeeper7656
    @cryptkeeper7656 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    At current interest rates the interest on our debt will be 3.8 trillion dollars a year by 2028 what the hell are you guys talking about

  • @13Bravo77
    @13Bravo77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Raise taxes on companies and they pass it on to consumers, = inflation

    • @redfisher5378
      @redfisher5378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lower taxes on the rich, lower corporate taxes. Then, stock buybacks!! Win-Win for the little guy!!

    • @Brendonbosy
      @Brendonbosy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not necessarily. Inflation is about price reaction to supply and demand. If you raise prices, it will drive down demand unless it’s a necessity like food. And even then, what happens is consumers will simply reallocate their spending (ie demand for non-essentials will go down or they’ll eat cheaper food) Housing is a perfect example of this. In 4 years housing costs have increased vs income, but you dont see rampant homelessness. Ppl simply put more % of their income towards housing and less towards things like commodities, vacations, etc. So on the whole, you may see “sticky inflation” on one part of the economy, but it balances with deflation on other parts

    • @jordanslingluff287
      @jordanslingluff287 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually tax increases are deflationary
      Tax cuts are inflationary.
      The response to inflation should have been some tax increases and cuts to government spending. That's what Clinton did in the 90s when we had high inflation. It never came back until Trump/Biden decided to light the country on fire doing the opposite along with 10+ years of free money.

    • @redfisher5378
      @redfisher5378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Brendonbosy the consumer of today doesn’t know how to stop spending.

    • @vincentgiasullo
      @vincentgiasullo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Brendonbosyif we implement mass tariffs, the cost will be passed on the consumer.

  • @iCanFlyWatchMe
    @iCanFlyWatchMe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cut spending

  • @daviddraper5627
    @daviddraper5627 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just drop a couple of trillion from your budget and see how that goes.

  • @damham5689
    @damham5689 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love how they glance over tariffs and social program cuts. Tariffs are a tax on Americans because the cost of the tariff is eventually paid by the consumers (plus the customary business add on because we can price increase and blame tariffs/inflation/regulation/wages/etc..)
    Deep cuts in social programs will hurt millions of Americans from newborn babies to the oldest. But it will help a couple thousand of the most wealthy by allowing them to pay less taxes on gains they never lifted a finger for or suffered for to get.

  • @BalajiHariharan81
    @BalajiHariharan81 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How about a plan from Democrats to cut spending? Why are we running 2T in deficits when the economy per them is " doing good" and there is full employment?

    • @redfisher5378
      @redfisher5378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How about a plan from Republicans to cut spending? Hasn't happened.

    • @ughwhyn0w
      @ughwhyn0w 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      spending has been cut under democrat presidents. not nearly to a balanced budget, but cut nontheless. what you should be asking is: what is republicans plans to fund their cuts? they spoke of the 2017 tax cuts as self funding once the economic impact was fully implemented, but that never manifested in substantial employee raises and more jobs. it ended up costing the US more (and still under the current admin). we're still paying for the tax cuts now.

    • @ezyryder11
      @ezyryder11 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Taiwan and Israel and Ukraine need our tax money apparently

    • @jacobwatson3781
      @jacobwatson3781 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You realize, the GOP spends more than DEMS right?

    • @jacobwatson3781
      @jacobwatson3781 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Giving weapons to Ukraine is the most efficient money spent by the US.

  • @nickvin7447
    @nickvin7447 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    By cutting spending libs.

    • @brad1928
      @brad1928 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Our largest expense is the military. You want to cut any of that bloated budget? How about social security? Education? Were you trying to cut spending pal? Cutting taxes reduces revenue, the irony is that you probably support that and also whine when the deficit increases

    • @redfisher5378
      @redfisher5378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don't get out or read much, do you? Oh wait: you watch NewsMax!!

    • @nickvin7447
      @nickvin7447 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brad1928 This level of delusion is truly legendary. We have the lowest defense budget of the past 10 years, what are you yapping about? School budgets have increased every year producing the same horrible results. Your people are getting voted out in November, you can bet your life on that.

    • @nickvin7447
      @nickvin7447 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brad1928 This level of delusion is truly legendary. We have the lowest defense budget of the past 10 years, what are you yapping about? School budgets have increased every year producing the same horrible results. Your people are getting voted out in November, take that to the bank.

    • @nickvin7447
      @nickvin7447 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brad1928 Can't wait to watch you cry when you are voted out in November.

  • @markfregly4148
    @markfregly4148 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You dont have to fund tax cuts

  • @harrychu650
    @harrychu650 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Simply put, discounts the views of anyone who talks in acronyms.

  • @jakemeyer8317
    @jakemeyer8317 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is no cost for cutting taxes

  • @germankononov8535
    @germankononov8535 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Обожаю твои ролики!) каждый раз угараю как гиена из король лев))))

  • @citymarine7256
    @citymarine7256 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Social Security duh….

  • @scothaynes608
    @scothaynes608 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Many comments here more than a little math challenged