Yeah....that white dude seemed to still live in delusion of his colonial past. Kishore put him in his place in most subtle fashion. Well done Kishore ❤indonesia
Their governments hide with tails between their legs and didn’t speak a word for Gaza and the oppressed people of Palestine, but have the audacity to lecture China and others about morality and freedom. A bunch of moral losers.
Kishore's end statement: "... so I think here this is a time when it' be good for Western Minds to show a certain degree of humility in talking to the rest of the world instead of telling the rest of the world we know better than you what is good for you... please don't do that anymore!" And this also applies directly to his idiotic interlocutor who went off his white bird brain to talk about Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong. Please man, enough of your stupid arrogance and sheer ignorance!
Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong is ALWAYS part of China for hundreds of years. Go back to school to learn history, and stop watching smearing propaganda from western media too much.
Westerners bringing up Tibet as a victim of China is just so absurd. Tibet was literally a theocratic society ruled by slavers until China liberated them. And the West talks of that as if it was evil. I mean, it shows how us Europeans love slavery and hate abolition, but you'd think they would pick a different cause that takes more than a quick google search to disprove.
What the interviewer insists on at at around the 7 minute mark, essentially boils down to: "don't look at what the West is doing, don't look at the West's human rights records or expansionism, we are here to criticize China for what we have always done at greater scale and consistency. And we want to feel righteous for doing so."
Eloquent and insightful as usual by the Professor. Truly the rare handful that understands how to navigate into a future with an ascending China. Kudos!
I think that the interviewer is brainwashed. It’s not his fault, but if he were deemed not to have already been successfully brainwashed, he would not be in a position to work where he does. Not being a part of the groupthink disqualifies a candidate for such a job.
This is from a BBC article: A number of attacks have been blamed on separatists in Xinjiang and beyond over the past decade. About 200 people - mostly Han Chinese - were killed in rioting in the regional capital Urumqi in 2009. A crackdown was stepped up after five people were stabbed to death in February 2017. It is highly likely the Chinese rounded up a large number of people into detention camps to change the violent trajectory. However there has been no evidence that genocide was the intent nor that a genocide took place, only accusations from the western media. The interviewer is a little behind in that the latest accusation is cultural genocide since actual genocide was not found, The better question is what should the Chinese government to do, is there a better way to deal with internal terrorism?
There is/was no cultural genocide. The Xinjiang population has increased, both Uhghur language and Mandarin are spoken, both languages displayed everywhere, they were having more than one child unlike Han Chinese who were only allowed one, they were given better chances for entering higher education and helped to obtain employment. People in Xinjiang are happy and thriving. Go and see for yourself, doubters. Anyway, plenty of videos on YT of westerners who have visited the area, start with watching Jerry Grey _ My Takes on China. Mr Kishore gave fantastic replies.
@@user-pr1ll1zy4n shifting argument. From genocide to cultural genocide. That's how the losing side tries to divert attention from total loss. Bottomline, they are losing. 😊😊😊
A "cultural" genocide in Xinjiang was occurring at the hands of Muslim extremists there, which was destroying and shaping Uighur culture. The Uighurs were traditionally mild muslims who have a long wine-making and drinking culture. During the 1990s and 2000s, muslim extremists would kill wine-makers and those who drank wine. Now that Xinjiang is stable, the Uighurs have again started making and drinking wine again, and can express their culture freely.
Wow this is certainly very refreshing from the BBC who has always spews hatred and fake news about China. I have for many years stopped listening and reading articles from the BBC and CNN, and in fact all media from the 5 eyes!
Meanwhile at a Senate hearing, Senator Josh Hawley was harassing TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew about Xinjiang “Is there or is there not genocide happening in Xinjiang” he demanded and would not allow him to escape the question. He could just as well have asked “Are you willing to accept our narrative?”
It's regretable westerners, including those supposedly learned, continue to adopt the narrative that Taiwan and the South China Sea are contested areas when the UN had in 1971 pronounced Taiwan is a province of China, while the process in which the Japanese conquered South China Sea was returned by US led WWII Allies leaders to China on historical ground is also recorded within the annals of the UN.
Taiwan is China according to not Only UN but Taiwan's constitution since surrender of Japanese empire. Much earlier than 1971. There is also no country called Taiwan but Republic of China based in Taiwan which was kicked out of UN seat like you said since 1971.
Orville is truly in a world of his own! He is a man who had sold his soul and constantly spews wrong narratives about China, and tragically he is aware of it but he’s paid to repeat that over and over again. Tragic man.
Another barely closeted white supremacist, who wants to brush away "whataboutism" of the West's own criminal history, just so he can pretend to have the moral authority to judge China. Like a failed student, insisting he has the "right" to be the invigilator for the final exam. Dis-gus-ting.
it is not difficult to handle China, even thousands of years ago, China could have conquered all of SEA, but instead, the SEA leaders just quietly send someone to the Chinese court, acknowledge their supremacy but carry on with their own business. so far it works, because China basically wanted all the countries to acknowledge that they are aware of and treated Chinese people fairly and allows them to go and trade there. Chinese people actually conquer with their money and genes, going there to trade and localize and establish Chinatowns and not with weapons and threats. war is bad for business.
I can’t believe he could still bring up human rights, after what the west has done to Gaza and Ukraine. After what it has done to many other countries in the very recent past. Iraq, Afghanistan, Cuba, so much of Africa, etc. No, you do not get to criticize. At all. Talk all you want. But make sure you talk within context. Compare what China is doing with what the other powers have done. Don’t just nitpick and take it out of context.
The interviewer accused Kishore of shifting subject about Tibet, But then when Kishore absolutely clobbered him on territory, he wanted to change topic to "human rights". Hypocrite.
11:00 - The West's consternation over information control in China is not about magnanimity (after all, western MSM is 90% propaganda), but because it deprives Anglo types from using that internal freedom to foment discord within Chinese society. He's still infected with the western sense of superiority, which is brand new btw, came about early 20th century with the maturation of the industrial revolution. Europe will go back to being a thin, slimy peninsula of the Eurasian landmass (which is, geographically, precisely what it is)
Borrowing a word from Prof. Kishore M... this interviewer is just incompetent to the core. He's just so full of himself with his biases and egotistic delusions.
At 8:54 we see the gaslighting. Why is it that smart and intelligent people are interviewed by these dumb cretins? The interviewer should just write for The Guardian and let a genuine person do these interviews instead.
10:52 This interview is hilarious. Is he actually this stupid, or is he paid to be this goldfish brained? "How will loosening up their internal policies allow them to be taken advantage of" Gee, that's a great question. The answer is in the question!
The Chinese and some Asian countries think democracy, human rights, freedom has to go according to the culture, and customs of the country. It’s totally different from the West. Chinese has Confucian teaching since thousand years. You can’t really change it. This teaching penetrated in the Chinese minds as the way of living. It’s a doctrine in daily behavior. China has democracy, freedom, human rights in their way.
@@tomtraster2065 Yes, greater good. Food and essentials were delivered. China's covid rates are proof in the pudding. The West preaching democracy is shamelessly hypocritcal, after countless assassinations of popular foreign leaders, and couping of popular foreign governments. Heard of Thomas Sankara? Patrice Lumumba? Heard of Allende/Pinochet, Mossadegh/Pahlavi? The West likes to ask "don't we all have the right to criticize?" - no, not if you have been couping and assassinating foreign leaders, destabilizing regions for private profit - no you don't. Go home.
In fact the GDP PPP - a vastly more meaningful measure than crude nominal GDP - of SE Asia now exceeds the GDP PPP of all of western europe. And ASEAN smokes europe for growth and has for many years.
China seeks win-win solution among varies nations. The Belt and Road initiative is an example. If China ever become a great nation, it can be a great benevolent nation.
It takes a great deal of self awareness to see and accept our own tendency and bias. Seek to understand before being understood. I think this applies to everyone, especially for the western countries. We teach our children to encourage and lift each other up by filling each other’s bucket. That’s what needed between countries too.
Why the host can say human rights abuses in China without citing any examples? And best yet, Kishore pretended that he didn't hear his human rights abuses question! Bizzaaaare !
I disagree with Kishore’s statement that big powers will consider their own interests first and then others second and that a large state will not be benevolent to a smaller state. Case in point, look at Israel/USA. The smaller state literally controls the larger one at the expense of the larger country’s own citizens.
The first point you talked about is about great powers being benign and you stated that no great power ever is benevolent, well to me if a country rules with force and violence then they are not a great power !!!
This "host" is still so representative of an anglo imperialist mindset here in the 21st century. Very likely he dismisses Mr. Mahbubani's closing rebuttals of incompetent Europeans' constant lecturing the majority global south.
Does the host think homelessness, healthcare and people shootings each others are not a human right problem? The above are the very basic human rights where the U.S doesn't have.
The guy should learn a thing about history. China didn't conquered Tibet, Mongolia. They invaded China Mongolia and Tibet invaded China for thousands years. Yuan Dynasty took control of China and Tibet. Tibet hasn't been a independent country since. Xinjiang was Mongol and Chinese for along time. In fact during the Qing dynasty they invited in the Muslims. They are not native to the area. China should have deported them back into central asia.
I hope the interviewer is only asking from a script that represents uneducated Western imperialists because if he actually believes the drivel he spouted, he is unqualified to speak. The sheer ignorance and naivety would be pitiable if we hadn't seen such ploys used in regime change time and again. "How would them relaxing internal policies lead to them being taken advantage of?" Does he think us stupid and not know all the American organizations assigned to each ethnic minority on the borders of China, ready with money and arms for the moment China rests for even a moment? "Surely we all have the right to talk about it openly and criticize just as we criticize our own government." What does he think he is doing right now? He's talking about it and making criticisms, where is the persecution? There is none; people talk and criticize every day and suffer no repression, what the imperialists actually want is to exert influence and usurp not just talk and criticize. And for all the implication that Westerners would criticize their own governments the same, I would like them to demonstrate it by prefacing every criticism of China with an equally long criticism of their own country; if they can't do it, then they should not criticize. Most damning of all is that the interviewer could not even get the name of the governing party correct. I thought child labour was illegal in the West but here we see one gainfully employed as a muppet.
Interviewer is not only prejudiced but also completely out of his depth. I guess the saying don’t judge a book by its cover holds true here ie just because you look smart doesn’t make you smart.
It is not arrogant, he is shameless. He avoided rhe Texas comparison because he know exactly how double standard the European are after they left such a mess in the whole world!
Don't just talk about human right when your own country is not perfect about human right . That's just showing off your arrogant. Look after yourself before criticizing someone else. Childish.
I am at the beginning of my "investment journey", planning to put 385K into dividend stocks so that I will be making up to 30% annually in dividend returns. any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated!
As a newbie investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Ruth Ann Tsakonas, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of information can be a big hurdle. I've been making more than $200k passively by just investing through an advisor, and I don't have to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my finances remain secure. So I really don't blame people who panic.
Without a doubt! Ruth Ann Tsakonas is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analysing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted on thorough research and years of practical experience..
how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
The tribe recognizes as thinkers those who think their evidence, while thinking is at odds with the evidence of the tribe Edgar Morin @edgarmorinparis Exposing the lies this civilisation told itself over millennia is a formidable challenge. It requires the humility to enter introspection, the courage to face the collapsing power structures coming from the domino of lies, and the willingness to face the day after: to be visionary, to genuinely want to progress, and to want to do the actual work needed to inaugurate a new multi-species civilisation: one with actual values and principles, not currencies.
Yeah....that white dude seemed to still live in delusion of his colonial past. Kishore put him in his place in most subtle fashion. Well done Kishore ❤indonesia
Absoluttly!
Prof Mahbubani is such a respectful intellect
😮
Europe not only could not prevent a war in their neighbourhood, it also could not prevent a genocide in Gaza
That's only because we are the USA's slaves in Europe.
and they are actively helping the genocide.
Prevent? How about active participation.
Their governments hide with tails between their legs and didn’t speak a word for Gaza and the oppressed people of Palestine, but have the audacity to lecture China and others about morality and freedom. A bunch of moral losers.
Kishore's end statement: "... so I think here this is a time when it' be good for Western Minds to show a certain degree of humility in talking to the rest of the world instead of telling the rest of the world we know better than you what is good for you... please don't do that anymore!" And this also applies directly to his idiotic interlocutor who went off his white bird brain to talk about Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong. Please man, enough of your stupid arrogance and sheer ignorance!
Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong is ALWAYS part of China for hundreds of years.
Go back to school to learn history, and stop watching smearing propaganda from western media too much.
Westerners bringing up Tibet as a victim of China is just so absurd. Tibet was literally a theocratic society ruled by slavers until China liberated them. And the West talks of that as if it was evil.
I mean, it shows how us Europeans love slavery and hate abolition, but you'd think they would pick a different cause that takes more than a quick google search to disprove.
@@kansax8253Never trust Westerners, they are working toward hidden agenda, definitely.
WOW WOW e ancora WOW ! Standing ovation per il sig. Mahbubani.
Correct statement from great great man of Asian 🌹🌹🌹
What the interviewer insists on at at around the 7 minute mark, essentially boils down to: "don't look at what the West is doing, don't look at the West's human rights records or expansionism, we are here to criticize China for what we have always done at greater scale and consistency. And we want to feel righteous for doing so."
Spot on the shameless western claim.
Kishore you're a man of patience. The paid troll is spreading Western lies and propaganda but your patience is out of this world❤
Eloquent and insightful as usual by the Professor. Truly the rare handful that understands how to navigate into a future with an ascending China.
Kudos!
Except that China is not ascendant. Their demographics are a time bomb. I doubt China will even exist in 30 or 40 years.
That interviewer is such a stooge
I think that the interviewer is brainwashed. It’s not his fault, but if he were deemed not to have already been successfully brainwashed, he would not be in a position to work where he does. Not being a part of the groupthink disqualifies a candidate for such a job.
“Peace reflects geopolitical competence, war reflects geopolitical incompetence” well said ❤
This is from a BBC article: A number of attacks have been blamed on separatists in Xinjiang and beyond over the past decade. About 200 people - mostly Han Chinese - were killed in rioting in the regional capital Urumqi in 2009. A crackdown was stepped up after five people were stabbed to death in February 2017.
It is highly likely the Chinese rounded up a large number of people into detention camps to change the violent trajectory. However there has been no evidence that genocide was the intent nor that a genocide took place, only accusations from the western media. The interviewer is a little behind in that the latest accusation is cultural genocide since actual genocide was not found,
The better question is what should the Chinese government to do, is there a better way to deal with internal terrorism?
There is/was no cultural genocide. The Xinjiang population has increased, both Uhghur language and Mandarin are spoken, both languages displayed everywhere, they were having more than one child unlike Han Chinese who were only allowed one, they were given better chances for entering higher education and helped to obtain employment. People in Xinjiang are happy and thriving. Go and see for yourself, doubters. Anyway, plenty of videos on YT of westerners who have visited the area, start with watching Jerry Grey _ My Takes on China.
Mr Kishore gave fantastic replies.
@@user-pr1ll1zy4n shifting argument. From genocide to cultural genocide. That's how the losing side tries to divert attention from total loss.
Bottomline, they are losing.
😊😊😊
A "cultural" genocide in Xinjiang was occurring at the hands of Muslim extremists there, which was destroying and shaping Uighur culture. The Uighurs were traditionally mild muslims who have a long wine-making and drinking culture. During the 1990s and 2000s, muslim extremists would kill wine-makers and those who drank wine. Now that Xinjiang is stable, the Uighurs have again started making and drinking wine again, and can express their culture freely.
Wow this is certainly very refreshing from the BBC who has always spews hatred and fake news about China. I have for many years stopped listening and reading articles from the BBC and CNN, and in fact all media from the 5 eyes!
Meanwhile at a Senate hearing, Senator Josh Hawley was harassing TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew about Xinjiang
“Is there or is there not genocide happening in Xinjiang” he demanded and would not allow him to escape the question. He could just as well have asked “Are you willing to accept our narrative?”
Kudos to Kishore I always admire his poise in dealing with these western corrupt propaganda infused malignant creatures.
Very good description of these social misfits. 😆😆😆👍🏻👍🏻
👍👍👍 to Kishore
It's regretable westerners, including those supposedly learned, continue to adopt the narrative that Taiwan and the South China Sea are contested areas when the UN had in 1971 pronounced Taiwan is a province of China, while the process in which the Japanese conquered South China Sea was returned by US led WWII Allies leaders to China on historical ground is also recorded within the annals of the UN.
Taiwan is China according to not Only UN but Taiwan's constitution since surrender of Japanese empire. Much earlier than 1971. There is also no country called Taiwan but Republic of China based in Taiwan which was kicked out of UN seat like you said since 1971.
They should stop sending such interviewer or the likes Orvillle to talk to Kishore. Their lack of knowledge of China is shameful.
Orville is truly in a world of his own! He is a man who had sold his soul and constantly spews wrong narratives about China, and tragically he is aware of it but he’s paid to repeat that over and over again. Tragic man.
Completely agree
when the white dude said CCP i know what is to come
Another barely closeted white supremacist, who wants to brush away "whataboutism" of the West's own criminal history, just so he can pretend to have the moral authority to judge China. Like a failed student, insisting he has the "right" to be the invigilator for the final exam. Dis-gus-ting.
it is not difficult to handle China, even thousands of years ago, China could have conquered all of SEA, but instead, the SEA leaders just quietly send someone to the Chinese court, acknowledge their supremacy but carry on with their own business. so far it works, because China basically wanted all the countries to acknowledge that they are aware of and treated Chinese people fairly and allows them to go and trade there. Chinese people actually conquer with their money and genes, going there to trade and localize and establish Chinatowns and not with weapons and threats. war is bad for business.
I can’t believe he could still bring up human rights, after what the west has done to Gaza and Ukraine. After what it has done to many other countries in the very recent past. Iraq, Afghanistan, Cuba, so much of Africa, etc.
No, you do not get to criticize. At all. Talk all you want. But make sure you talk within context. Compare what China is doing with what the other powers have done. Don’t just nitpick and take it out of context.
Agree 💯!
The interviewer accused Kishore of shifting subject about Tibet, But then when Kishore absolutely clobbered him on territory, he wanted to change topic to "human rights".
Hypocrite.
the Europeans are living in denial.
11:00 - The West's consternation over information control in China is not about magnanimity (after all, western MSM is 90% propaganda), but because it deprives Anglo types from using that internal freedom to foment discord within Chinese society. He's still infected with the western sense of superiority, which is brand new btw, came about early 20th century with the maturation of the industrial revolution. Europe will go back to being a thin, slimy peninsula of the Eurasian landmass (which is, geographically, precisely what it is)
He is a wise man with amazing geopolitical opinions, the West & US should pay attention to!
Borrowing a word from Prof. Kishore M... this interviewer is just incompetent to the core. He's just so full of himself with his biases and egotistic delusions.
Someone should ask the Europeans why they never talk about ongoing colonization and cultural genocide of Greenland.
Not sure if the interviewer is naive or stupid. I'm speechless at his comments and questions.
He is just shameless.
The last 2:30 minutes was great! Kishore’s last point just highlighted the hypocrisy of the interviewer’s earlier point about “discussing” issues.
At 8:54 we see the gaslighting. Why is it that smart and intelligent people are interviewed by these dumb cretins? The interviewer should just write for The Guardian and let a genuine person do these interviews instead.
10:52 This interview is hilarious. Is he actually this stupid, or is he paid to be this goldfish brained? "How will loosening up their internal policies allow them to be taken advantage of"
Gee, that's a great question. The answer is in the question!
The host is rubbish.
It’s the usual “I’m superior to you” mentality coming from the western world.
The Chinese and some Asian countries think democracy, human rights, freedom has to go according to the culture, and customs of the country. It’s totally different from the West. Chinese has Confucian teaching since thousand years. You can’t really change it. This teaching penetrated in the Chinese minds as the way of living. It’s a doctrine in daily behavior. China has democracy, freedom, human rights in their way.
People were welded into their apartments in Wuhan. Welded in. Greater good though eh?
@@tomtraster2065 Yes, greater good. Food and essentials were delivered. China's covid rates are proof in the pudding. The West preaching democracy is shamelessly hypocritcal, after countless assassinations of popular foreign leaders, and couping of popular foreign governments. Heard of Thomas Sankara? Patrice Lumumba? Heard of Allende/Pinochet, Mossadegh/Pahlavi? The West likes to ask "don't we all have the right to criticize?" - no, not if you have been couping and assassinating foreign leaders, destabilizing regions for private profit - no you don't. Go home.
In fact the GDP PPP - a vastly more meaningful measure than crude nominal GDP - of SE Asia now exceeds the GDP PPP of all of western europe. And ASEAN smokes europe for growth and has for many years.
God Bless China/Russia/BRICS/Asia/Africa
Not forgetting Latin America that is moving towards the BRiCS.
I think the interviewer arrived on the last rain drop.
China seeks win-win solution among varies nations. The Belt and Road initiative is an example. If China ever become a great nation, it can be a great benevolent nation.
GDP per capita
Tibet 2011 US$2,886
Tibet 2021 US$8,157
It takes a great deal of self awareness to see and accept our own tendency and bias. Seek to understand before being understood. I think this applies to everyone, especially for the western countries. We teach our children to encourage and lift each other up by filling each other’s bucket. That’s what needed between countries too.
Why the host can say human rights abuses in China without citing any examples? And best yet, Kishore pretended that he didn't hear his human rights abuses question! Bizzaaaare !
Was waiting to hear about the terrorist at the border!
The US Mexican boarder is a great example of western charity and human rights???
Since when did Harry Potter get into politics and western propaganda?
😂😂😂😂😂
Wondering if this "Westener" advocates as hard to address the American school to prison pipeline.
Beautiful msg
"we know better than you about what is good for you"
Agreed with kishore
I disagree with Kishore’s statement that big powers will consider their own interests first and then others second and that a large state will not be benevolent to a smaller state. Case in point, look at Israel/USA. The smaller state literally controls the larger one at the expense of the larger country’s own citizens.
Wrong, Israel and uncle Sam are ONE. Not small/big States.
Without Israel the USA is a third world country.
True, so very true!
Has the moderator been to 新疆？ He was so ready to accept the smears as facts.
Some countries can be loosening up to 50, so the UN will have 243 members
I wonder if Kishore wished he had a chancla to give the interviewer as a high speed present
Hi Kishor,talking about small countries, Singapore has sanctions a great power whose is also a leader of Brics.What is your take?
When ask about xinjiang and tibet autonomous region Kishore take example of Mexico and immediately we can see how westerners reaction. 😂
It is not whataboutism. The g-side in the US and gaga zaza are real; there is no g-side in Xin Ji ang.
Putin calls it colonial mind set .
☝👍💐🙏😊
China may need new bloods now besides Kishore...too tiring for him to argue alone...
Accusations is facts?
😅😅😅👍👍👏👏👏💪💪💪💪😍😍😍😍😍💝💝💝💝💝💝💪💝💝
The first point you talked about is about great powers being benign and you stated that no great power ever is benevolent, well to me if a country rules with force and violence then they are not a great power !!!
To see the many comments hidden by YT, tap on the "Newest" option in the Comments bar.
Seems like a smart man. Although he seems a little dismissive of human rights of uses.
Gaha
This "host" is still so representative of an anglo imperialist mindset here in the 21st century. Very likely he
dismisses Mr. Mahbubani's closing rebuttals of incompetent Europeans' constant lecturing the majority global south.
Does the host think homelessness, healthcare and people shootings each others are not a human right problem?
The above are the very basic human rights where the U.S doesn't have.
The guy should learn a thing about history. China didn't conquered Tibet, Mongolia. They invaded China Mongolia and Tibet invaded China for thousands years. Yuan Dynasty took control of China and Tibet. Tibet hasn't been a independent country since. Xinjiang was Mongol and Chinese for along time. In fact during the Qing dynasty they invited in the Muslims. They are not native to the area. China should have deported them back into central asia.
I hope the interviewer is only asking from a script that represents uneducated Western imperialists because if he actually believes the drivel he spouted, he is unqualified to speak.
The sheer ignorance and naivety would be pitiable if we hadn't seen such ploys used in regime change time and again. "How would them relaxing internal policies lead to them being taken advantage of?" Does he think us stupid and not know all the American organizations assigned to each ethnic minority on the borders of China, ready with money and arms for the moment China rests for even a moment? "Surely we all have the right to talk about it openly and criticize just as we criticize our own government." What does he think he is doing right now? He's talking about it and making criticisms, where is the persecution? There is none; people talk and criticize every day and suffer no repression, what the imperialists actually want is to exert influence and usurp not just talk and criticize. And for all the implication that Westerners would criticize their own governments the same, I would like them to demonstrate it by prefacing every criticism of China with an equally long criticism of their own country; if they can't do it, then they should not criticize.
Most damning of all is that the interviewer could not even get the name of the governing party correct. I thought child labour was illegal in the West but here we see one gainfully employed as a muppet.
Interviewer is not only prejudiced but also completely out of his depth. I guess the saying don’t judge a book by its cover holds true here ie just because you look smart doesn’t make you smart.
Such a patronizing journalist. Só sad. No humility.
✨🕊️✨ 🧸👶❤️
Arrogant interviewer vs eloquent professor.
It is not arrogant, he is shameless. He avoided rhe Texas comparison because he know exactly how double standard the European are after they left such a mess in the whole world!
Don't just talk about human right when your own country is not perfect about human right . That's just showing off your arrogant. Look after yourself before criticizing someone else. Childish.
The host is really annoying, he only knows western propaganda, get him out of the stage. There is no Xinjiang genocide!!! Go to Ga za.
This interviewer is so biased and full of arrogance.
I don’t think there is peace in Asia if America is not present.
On the contrary, wherever the America treads on there will be chaos
Living in Japan for like 30 years. Doesn't seem like chaos.
I am at the beginning of my "investment journey", planning to put 385K into dividend stocks so that I will be making up to 30% annually in dividend returns. any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated!
As a newbie investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Ruth Ann Tsakonas, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of information can be a big hurdle. I've been making more than $200k passively by just investing through an advisor, and I don't have to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my finances remain secure. So I really don't blame people who panic.
Without a doubt! Ruth Ann Tsakonas is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analysing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted on thorough research and years of practical experience..
how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
He never misses an opportunity to quote Kissinger and to sell his books. Most unscholarly.
Lousy brain washed fellow
When you can't refute any of his factual arguments, you take a cheap shot at his undisputed credentials as a scholar? Try harder next time.
Lol. A narrow-minded, childish judgmental view of this man. It’s the kind of pathetic behavior that is typical of weak, white American bigots
Only in this book
Cope. Maybe the US can bottle and sell it. Could kickstart your industrialisation
Kashmir moslem &
Khalistani Sikh must proclaim independence too folks
The tribe recognizes as thinkers those who think their evidence, while thinking is at odds with the evidence of the tribe
Edgar Morin @edgarmorinparis
Exposing the lies this civilisation told itself over millennia is a formidable challenge. It requires the humility to enter introspection, the courage to face the collapsing power structures coming from the domino of lies, and the willingness to face the day after: to be visionary, to genuinely want to progress, and to want to do the actual work needed to inaugurate a new multi-species civilisation: one with actual values and principles, not currencies.
Arunachal Pradesh / Southern Tibetan must be declare got freedom too folks