A battery the size of a iphone carrying more energy than an entire Tesla pack... I always wondered how those star trek phasers could carry the energy they needed..
All laser weapons use the same power source in science fiction. They use a micro fusion reactor that's why they never run out of electricity. Even Tony Stark's arc reactor is a fusion reactor minitarirized.
No iphone sized battery Will ever hold the same charge as a Tesla car battery. For this, the battery has to go nuclear. There is a clear distinction between energy from transforming the atom nucleus, which is nuclear energy which is accessing the 'weak force', one of the four fundamental forces. And between energy from tapping into the electromagnetic force, again one of the four fundamental forces, which only manipulates electrons around the nucleus but doesn't affect the nucleus itself. Hydrogen is the best user of electromagnetic force for storage and conversion of energy, particularly chemical energy to heat. Even a liquid hydrogen battery the size of an iPhone can't be enough for a car's full miles range and nothing can beat a liquid hydrogen battery.
@@arillistionis4799 Thank you Captain Obvious next rank Admiral Sure Fucking Thing. Technology is advancing so eventually we will find a way to stabilize it. "Never" is a strong word.
@@AlexFlockhart, your reply may sound better in 20 years, when the process will be COMPLETELY different than this video, narrated via "I'm only a messenger."
@@TheZenytram, your reply may sound better in 70 years, when the process will be COMPLETELY different than this video, narrated via "I'm only a messenger."
SugarBooty but you could make graphene go in certain “moulds” and leave gaps and still be able for dialysis. Who knows what is possible but I’m sure this will be at some point, in fact I read something I think they found how to do this basics by heating certain parts more than others and where it wasn’t heated it left gaps. Obviously it can make it weaker etc and can tear in weak points but considering it’s still mostly in development as a material in every area this probably will be able to be done
The graphene revolution will probably be like plastic, slow. If you search around, there are already companies offering graphene products. They are not what we expect but I think we are getting there. Thanks for the comment.
@@michaelgrow9550 Graphene nanoparticles are being used in viable batteries now. I don't know how long it will take to get graphene sheets out there but Graphene nanoparticle technologies are imminent.
Invest in a company with a product demonstrating the use of graphene. Some company just made a power bank as a proof of concept and to prove it's viable to actually manufacture it. The youtube channel "Cold Fusion" just did a video on it.
Honestly I would hold back because most of the companies which are big enough to be publicly traded aren't going to be worth your time in the long run. The smaller emerging forms are all going to be known publicly traded or only available to qualified investors< meaning you earn $200,000 per year or $300,000 per year for a couple for at least two years and can demonstrate the likelihood of earning the same in the future.>
i just invested in Gratomic - a materials development company investing in graphite resources. it is a dollar stock and seems low risk for a longer term investment
I hope because his claims is total bullshit. Saying that Graphene batteries the size of a iphone maby can replace a Tesla battery. WFT? That's beyond stupid.
Chemical vapor deposition...the right heat and preasure on methane and hydrogen,which collects on a copper substrate and forms a 40 ft sheet of graphene at mit. Looking forward to seeing how much they make when they upgrade their equipment and who will use it first....thanks for the knowledge,God bless the omniverse multi verses universes...everyone doing great things!
Graphene will change the world. Also they are working on Solid state Batteries which will also be a huge advancement. You should make a video on that if you haven't already.
As a material scientist, I have to say the following: - Nanotubes are indeed promising for many applications - Graphene is a potential candidate for efficient fuel cells, so there is much research for graphene in electromobility BUT - Graphene (consisting of pure carbon) is one of the worst materials for applications where heat resistance is required! So the part from 5:52 to 6:12 is absolute bullshit... Nevertheless a good video!
Hey, thanks for the comment. so would you say that First graphene Firestop is BS? firstgraphene.net/applications/fire-retardancy/ i would like to know your opinion.
If you make the wire using the MIT process really small like fibers the are flatted you cann weave a graphene surface and then weave at 1.1 degrees for superconductivity as you mention in your other video...weaved graphene as carbon fiber is weaved for various thermal, conductive, and structural properties ...the substrate copper can be substituted for other metals for varying properties
Graphene deserves much more attention. There should be sheets available at every public library. Someone should publish a book about graphene with a few sheets of graphene as part of the book! This way the reader can experiment with it. Imagine a highway made of many layers of graphene. It could store solar energy and transmit it at will. A skyway strand of graphene cable could guide and power a gondola from China to California !
@@enbiomatriclab Hey Thanks; that's amazing I had no idea! I am not an engineer but I wish I was! I fear that so much has already been invested in the Lithium Tech and infrastructure that Graphene will be deliberately "sat on".
@@enbiomatriclab That's interesting. Is the focus entirely on small devices or are people interested in it as a material for structures? I am particularly interested in how it can be used in composites as a filler material. I don't think we really need to perfect the properties or quality of graphene for those applications, we just need to develop mass production with some sort of process so that it is produced in the order of tons rather than mg. But this interest gets mixed in with the interest in using it as a conductor on electronic devices, which seems a totally unrelated application because in one, you produce bulk in a reactor vs the other you apply thin coats to a substrate and there is no bulk product to go to market with.
Great video. I'm excited about Graphene uses, especially mobile devise batteries, like phones, smart watches, tablets, electric cars etc. Can you imagine a mobile phone going a whole week before charging it or putting a AA battery (made of Graphene) in to a torch that can stay on for a whole week. I think the battery manufacturers will have something to say about that.
No matter how much I hear or read about graphene, and how much I groan internally about how it's looking less and less likely to take over in my lifetime, I'm still enamored by the potential it has to just break things whenever it does. Like, broad swaths of tech just obsolete overnight the moment we get large-scale, minimal-defect production of the stuff and the wherewithal to do what we want with it.
Why? Conductivity is 1.4 times that of copper. Why you hating on copper? Copper is amazing. Does having 40% increase in conductivity really blow everything else out of the water? I mean copper pretty awesome already, so I don't see why we would expect such huge leaps forward by getting to graphene.
Any references for the promises at 5:17? I'm not an expert in energy storage, but I am familiar with existing energy storage designs and have never heard of anything remotely on the scale of iPhone powering a Tesla energy densities. I know supercaps are getting made with graphene, but that barely brings them in line with existing liion batteries. Sounds like bullshit so far.
@@ExtantFrodo2 Graphene supercaps will have more energy than Li-Ion but I'm pretty sure that density claimed here won't be possible. I think he needs to vet his sources.
Interesting, though I wonder how bad people will freak out when a battery the size of and I-phone explodes. Accidents are bound to happen and that much energy stored in a small space will cause a lot of damage if released rapidly. I hope this tech comes to fruition like you stated, that will help in so many areas.
you likely have supercapacitors near you now which have enough energy to kill you instantly. your house encircles you with enough electricity to cook you alive.. but youre not dead
Your 'The wonders of the Miracle Material ' animation have one free floating carbon atom (green dot not attached to anything) that got my OCD to next gear! 😂
Im an engineer, in 1990, (29 years ago) I worked for a company that made diamonds... diamond substrates. After about 1 1/2 years there, testing and developing, I came to work one day and was not allowed in. Men identifying themselves as FBI told me to go home and wait for instructions. I was told to return to work 2 days later to collect my things. The ENTIRE company was SEIZED, rolled up and taken away. That was 29 years ago... Has anyone seen a DIAMOND PROCESSOR in a computer or cell phone? NOPE, and you NEVER WILL. The Government has them though. Diamond can withstand heat hundreds of times better than silicone chips.. meaning MORE SPEED, FASTER COMPUTERS. Graphene is no different. The explanation you are hearing here is quite old tech. The Government has been manufacturing high grade Graphene for more than 10 years now. Fear not, remember everything is relative. During World War 2 'plastic' was NEW... a pound of plastic, as difficult as it was to manufacture at the time, was worth a pound go GOLD... Today, we make trash bags out of plastics. The impact of Graphene is going to be epic. Light and transparent solar panels, and batteries will put EVERY oil company OUT OF BUSINESS. Im aware of one instance of a company 3D printing a lithium type cell phone battery.... It had 10 times the capacity in the same area. That was only a first attempt. Now imagine an electric car, with a graphene battery taking up the same area, with 10 times the capacity, attached to transparent solar panels in every window of the car.. AND embedded in the surface of the body panels. A car that you would never have to charge, unlimited travel distance. ALWAYS ON charging. Same with your house, these BIG UGLE SOLAR panels are OBSOLETE. Graphene solar will actually look like your roofing material, it will also be transparent, and in every south facing window of your home. Graphene will change EVERYTHING.
What would happen if our you relayered the graphene but offset the layers and pulled them through another layers larger gaps? Sort of like quilting it together.
I'm not sure if I have the facts entirely clear but I was led to believe that to grow defect free graphene on a surface like copper then it first becomes a necessity to have a defect free copper surface. Is this correct or incorrect? It led me to think about how I could utilise 1~10nm copper nano particles plated in nickle to polish the copper surface with just enough abrasion to smooth out any defects but if the MIT guys have figured out how to do it using industrial quantities of copper film then that's pretty fantastic really.
Unless what they have is actually graphene sheet but which has defects but this doesn't detract from the accomplishment, it only means that with some additional quality assurance procedures they may very well have cracked the problem and that's fantastic.
From their paper, its not clear if its defect free. However they do mention that the copper was refined in order to optimize the production quality. To be honest we will eventually get there in terms of purity because there is a LOT of interest for this material, which I will talk about in later videos, so stay tuned.
I'm wondering a step further.....if a graphene belt could be utilized by depositing directly onto it, reusing the belt over and over, and simply use micro "scrubbers" to either remove all excess copper atoms after deposition but before burning, or to find another way. I'm thinking a graphene sheet as a substrate instead of copper might be beneficial.
If I am understanding your thinking correctly, if you deposited carbon atoms onto existing graphene then I would have thought the end result of this would be 2 layer graphene but separating one layer from the other without causing defect's would likely be problematic.
Wait...carbon nanotubes are tubes made of a 1-dimensional layer of carbon whose atoms are arranged in a repeating hexagon pattern. ...That's what graphene is
@@slavkosky It may be possible to create carbon nanotubes from graphene, but it is far from obvious whether that would be the most efficient way to produce them.
There are better alternatives to space elevators, that only only require materials we already have. - Skyhooks, for example. - Ideally: Orbital ring(s) but... there will be still some time before those are economical. :D .... like 30 years or so XD -- really, though: orbital rings are awesome ^^
I wonder if there's any way to get the roll of copper in and out of the gas chamber without leaking, something like pushing it through a bath of mercury (even though that would degrade the copper) such that your graphene would not be limited in length to the length of the copper roll. That way you could perhaps roll all the graphene into a pure graphene ring that could be used as a link in a super strong chain or something Also I can see that if the copper doesn't need a seed, multiple domains of graphene would weed themselves at once and grow together. I would think there would be defects at the seams where the growing domains meet.
@@iamchillydogg precisely, the length of the ribbon is still limited to the space incide the starting vacuum chamber. I just thought it would be cool to be able to create an indefinitely long ribbon
4:02 why they use CH4(methane) than CO2(carbon dioxide)? Itis less dangerous , more cheap and i think can be more pure(the molecule its smaller) Another question the cooper band its charged with electric curent or samething? I ask it because that can help oriented and order the carbon(C) atoms.
The reason is that it takes more energy to break the CO2 bonds but I heard that they are working on some technologies to actually use CO2. For your second question, its not charged, but i could be wrong. What they explain is that it is a property of the copper itself that facilitates the process when heated with temperatures of 700˚C+
@@SubjectZeroScience I heard that the reason why they can't make a space elevator out of this process is because, even though it is high quality... the space elevator ribbon needs to be perfectly made. Is there not some way they could inspect and correct the imperfections to create suitable graphene for a space elevator?
I wonder if it's possible to capture energy from craft re-entry into planetary atmosphere. It might offer some additional energy for planet side activity.
You do know you're not a football commentator from the 50's right? You don't have to repeat the same tonal inflections over an over when you describe the subject.
personally I loved it, brings back a lot of good memories... Hockey Night in Canada, and the CFL commentary... ahhhhh, those were the days... or daze :D feel like some days I'm staring in a Sci Movie or TV show (My Favorite Martian) from the 60's... Why does Mars have a desert the size of several thousand Sahara's.... where is my flying car?? LOL... yesterday I saw a kidney specialist, and he wasn't shocked or put a downer on my Longevity ideas, and he knew of Ray Kurzweil and Peter Diamandis and their work... he just said, you are in good health and we'll see about keeping you that way.... you just have to do the work of maintaining a good diet and exercise... and we'll monitor the rest... Gov't Medicare (we call it OHIP here in Ontario) is a miracle... by American SS Calculator I've got 15.5 years left to reach 86... by Canadian Stats, we add 3-4 years because of our health care system.... so figure near as makes no difference, 20 years, or 2038/9 for the average... I'll be 91... if you don't know what's coming, how can you take advantage of it... :D
How did you figure the energy density for a battery the size of an iPhone that would replace the batteries of a Tesla? I thought that the theoretical maximum for chemical storage was about the same as hydrocarbons, or perhaps a small multiple of that -- not orders of magnitude greater!
Everything I have read about graphene batteries has a theoretical energy density about 10 times that of lithium ion. In other words, this guy is full of shit.
and another question. How they split the two elements? the graphene film from a cooper layer. what method can be used. its easy to do it and not make damge to the graphene or the roll cooper?
Apparently that is not the problem at all. From what i got form the paper, they are having trouble with the fact that the Graphene sheet roll onto itself. so its not sticky. I have to look more into this.
Can you determine the orientation of the graphene Hexagons? I read in an article yesterday that the orientation pretty much determines the strength on tge graphene.
That's not quite how it works. The orientation is important, but only in the way that neighboring “hexagons” (what we call grains) need to be in the same direction for the crystals to fuse. If they are not, then the boundary will be weaker.
I was gonna say, ya it's kinda pointless to use space ships if you can make large scale graphene structures. Especially something as simple as a ribbon (albeit an insanely long one).
I think the secrete could be the extreme thermal conductivity, about 10 to 20 times of the copper. Then they could dissipate the heat with water vapor, before it could be burn in the air. But the heat energy produced is so big that even this may be impossible.
Ow, I am aware of it. The problem is that when you finally upload it, you are just sick and tired of re-watching the video over and over again. specially when you do this after work. LOL
Am I watching the turning point in the History? Am I watching the end of Oil and Gas Industry? If yes, then I am happy about it. Congrats world, for cleaner world!
I think your video is great and think graphene is future in every one's life and the many products that will never rust... Cars should never rust and the steel mills might not sell much. Refrigerators and washing machines won't rust. Older cars can be fitted with new graphene parts and the age of automobiles will go up. Just replace the worn parts and interior and you got yourself a new car with low property taxes. The Tax man ain't goanna like it and the electric cars can travel farther with this light structure Graphene. Thanks for the great video and when do you think the new batteries will hit the market? Home power for you home and hunting lodge in the woods and hills. Cheaper heat and cooling. Crank up the wind mill and charge things up. The future looks bright and all you tax slaves might have an extra dollar in your pocket when you retire. But watch out those jobs out there might not make the Standard of Living. children. Teach your well.
this is wrong in 2021 we learned that : - we can produce grephen at large scale - one iphone size graphen battery would cost a lot and would not store "a tesla" battery in terms of energy - you cannot store energy for a long time (with pure graphene unfortunalty) - silicon won't be replaced by graphen because it cannot "hold" information "long enough" - much more stuff
A battery the size of a iphone carrying more energy than an entire Tesla pack... I always wondered how those star trek phasers could carry the energy they needed..
Finally we know how they do
It'll never existist, anything with such a high energy density would go boom, if disrupted in any way.
All laser weapons use the same power source in science fiction. They use a micro fusion reactor that's why they never run out of electricity. Even Tony Stark's arc reactor is a fusion reactor minitarirized.
No iphone sized battery Will ever hold the same charge as a Tesla car battery.
For this, the battery has to go nuclear. There is a clear distinction between energy from transforming the atom nucleus, which is nuclear energy which is accessing the 'weak force', one of the four fundamental forces. And between energy from tapping into the electromagnetic force, again one of the four fundamental forces, which only manipulates electrons around the nucleus but doesn't affect the nucleus itself.
Hydrogen is the best user of electromagnetic force for storage and conversion of energy, particularly chemical energy to heat. Even a liquid hydrogen battery the size of an iPhone can't be enough for a car's full miles range and nothing can beat a liquid hydrogen battery.
@@arillistionis4799 Thank you Captain Obvious next rank Admiral Sure Fucking Thing.
Technology is advancing so eventually we will find a way to stabilize it.
"Never" is a strong word.
"Graphene can do everything....except leave the lab."
You could have said the same about metallic aluminum or artificial diamonds at one time or another
you could say that to silicon in the 50s
Fox Vulpes so true!
@@AlexFlockhart, your reply may sound better in 20 years, when the process will be COMPLETELY different than this video, narrated via "I'm only a messenger."
@@TheZenytram, your reply may sound better in 70 years, when the process will be COMPLETELY different than this video, narrated via "I'm only a messenger."
Yes, Blender needs more ads.
Hope graphene will help improve dialysis machines and reduce sufferings of kidney patients
Is there any research done on this? I'd imagine the holes are too small
Wonderful potential for water purification/desalination, chemical production as well. Could be a game changer in developing countries.
@@alhemmings8554 Water filtration, yes. Dialysis would need bigger holes
SugarBooty but you could make graphene go in certain “moulds” and leave gaps and still be able for dialysis.
Who knows what is possible but I’m sure this will be at some point, in fact I read something I think they found how to do this basics by heating certain parts more than others and where it wasn’t heated it left gaps.
Obviously it can make it weaker etc and can tear in weak points but considering it’s still mostly in development as a material in every area this probably will be able to be done
In my head I was listening to this video with the voice of Cave Johnson from Aperture Science. Does anyone have some cake?
Yeah, I love the aperture science references on his videos!
funny fact is...
I found the cake from Aperture science in a restaurant I go to.
4:34 There's a loose atom
I've been watching graphene since 2010 and it looks like graphene is getting ready to break out, great video!
The graphene revolution will probably be like plastic, slow. If you search around, there are already companies offering graphene products. They are not what we expect but I think we are getting there.
Thanks for the comment.
Should we invest?
Please keep watching graphene. It may get out of the lab after another 30 years.
When
@@michaelgrow9550 Graphene nanoparticles are being used in viable batteries now. I don't know how long it will take to get graphene sheets out there but Graphene nanoparticle technologies are imminent.
Boy, I can see a Promising TH-camr, Glad to be first 500 of the BIG Family in the Future.
I’ve been following the graphene developments for nearly a decade now.
My only question is how do I invest in graphene.
Invest in a company with a product demonstrating the use of graphene. Some company just made a power bank as a proof of concept and to prove it's viable to actually manufacture it. The youtube channel "Cold Fusion" just did a video on it.
Honestly I would hold back because most of the companies which are big enough to be publicly traded aren't going to be worth your time in the long run. The smaller emerging forms are all going to be known publicly traded or only available to qualified investors< meaning you earn $200,000 per year or $300,000 per year for a couple for at least two years and can demonstrate the likelihood of earning the same in the future.>
TLGRF
i just invested in Gratomic - a materials development company investing in graphite resources. it is a dollar stock and seems low risk for a longer term investment
Why doesn’t this guys have more subscribers
Because of the annoying tonal inflections
because the majority of people on the net are from Amerikka... and have tender ears....
Because if you can't use it nobody cares.
Haha , I thought only I found his talking style a bit annoying. Enough to not subbscribe in my case.
I hope because his claims is total bullshit. Saying that Graphene batteries the size of a iphone maby can replace a Tesla battery.
WFT? That's beyond stupid.
Chemical vapor deposition...the right heat and preasure on methane and hydrogen,which collects on a copper substrate and forms a 40 ft sheet of graphene at mit. Looking forward to seeing how much they make when they upgrade their equipment and who will use it first....thanks for the knowledge,God bless the omniverse multi verses universes...everyone doing great things!
Thank you for the comment. Im actually very excite for the next few years for the exact same reasons as you. Cheers.
Just awesome explanation .... I've been keen to learn about Graphene production .... And this video did it all
Take a look at Robert Murray-Smith's channel for how tos on making Graphene at home.
Graphene will change the world. Also they are working on Solid state Batteries which will also be a huge advancement. You should make a video on that if you haven't already.
As a material scientist, I have to say the following:
- Nanotubes are indeed promising for many applications
- Graphene is a potential candidate for efficient fuel cells, so there is much research for graphene in electromobility
BUT
- Graphene (consisting of pure carbon) is one of the worst materials for applications where heat resistance is required! So the part from 5:52 to 6:12 is absolute bullshit...
Nevertheless a good video!
Hey, thanks for the comment. so would you say that First graphene Firestop is BS?
firstgraphene.net/applications/fire-retardancy/
i would like to know your opinion.
MIT Graphene Roll-To-Roll CVD Explained. Sounds complex but its quite simple really. Leave a like, it helps a lot.
If you make the wire using the MIT process really small like fibers the are flatted you cann weave a graphene surface and then weave at 1.1 degrees for superconductivity as you mention in your other video...weaved graphene as carbon fiber is weaved for various thermal, conductive, and structural properties ...the substrate copper can be substituted for other metals for varying properties
Liked and subbed bro, awesome visuals btw!
Re-entry's big problem is dumping the heat... therefore, the shields are ablative... designed to shed hot pieces.
Graphene deserves much more attention. There should be sheets available at every public library. Someone should publish a book about graphene with a few sheets of graphene as part of the book! This way the reader can experiment with it. Imagine a highway made of many layers of graphene. It could store solar energy and transmit it at will. A skyway strand of graphene cable could guide and power a gondola from China to California !
Go to any conference on materials. 80% of the papers/posters are on graphene. It's the only attraction everywhere.
@@enbiomatriclab Hey Thanks; that's amazing I had no idea! I am not an engineer but I wish I was! I fear that so much has already been invested in the Lithium Tech and infrastructure that Graphene will be deliberately "sat on".
@@enbiomatriclab That's interesting. Is the focus entirely on small devices or are people interested in it as a material for structures? I am particularly interested in how it can be used in composites as a filler material. I don't think we really need to perfect the properties or quality of graphene for those applications, we just need to develop mass production with some sort of process so that it is produced in the order of tons rather than mg. But this interest gets mixed in with the interest in using it as a conductor on electronic devices, which seems a totally unrelated application because in one, you produce bulk in a reactor vs the other you apply thin coats to a substrate and there is no bulk product to go to market with.
Great video. I'm excited about Graphene uses, especially mobile devise batteries, like phones, smart watches, tablets, electric cars etc. Can you imagine a mobile phone going a whole week before charging it or putting a AA battery (made of Graphene) in to a torch that can stay on for a whole week. I think the battery manufacturers will have something to say about that.
er... imagine people in poor countries having fresh water and not dying of horrible disease. But hey you need your new toy
this video exposes your lack of understanding but it's still awesome
No matter how much I hear or read about graphene, and how much I groan internally about how it's looking less and less likely to take over in my lifetime, I'm still enamored by the potential it has to just break things whenever it does. Like, broad swaths of tech just obsolete overnight the moment we get large-scale, minimal-defect production of the stuff and the wherewithal to do what we want with it.
Why? Conductivity is 1.4 times that of copper. Why you hating on copper? Copper is amazing. Does having 40% increase in conductivity really blow everything else out of the water? I mean copper pretty awesome already, so I don't see why we would expect such huge leaps forward by getting to graphene.
Any references for the promises at 5:17? I'm not an expert in energy storage, but I am familiar with existing energy storage designs and have never heard of anything remotely on the scale of iPhone powering a Tesla energy densities. I know supercaps are getting made with graphene, but that barely brings them in line with existing liion batteries. Sounds like bullshit so far.
With that kind of energy density in that lightweight package you could be powering flying cars, not just Teslas.
@@ExtantFrodo2 Graphene supercaps will have more energy than Li-Ion but I'm pretty sure that density claimed here won't be possible. I think he needs to vet his sources.
Fantastic video and the animations were A+++. You got yourself a new sub.
In CDDA i use a CVD machine to diamond coat my zwheihander. Makes it cut a little better.
CVD, Chemical Vapor Deposition
wonderful video series, keep making such videos
Interesting, though I wonder how bad people will freak out when a battery the size of and I-phone explodes. Accidents are bound to happen and that much energy stored in a small space will cause a lot of damage if released rapidly. I hope this tech comes to fruition like you stated, that will help in so many areas.
you likely have supercapacitors near you now which have enough energy to kill you instantly. your house encircles you with enough electricity to cook you alive.. but youre not dead
Do you have any information on graphene batteries exploding?
This gives off portal 2 trailer vibes.
That was the intent but people didn’t like it. Ow well
Graphene Latex is my new obsession
I want to learn all its application beyond extra sensitive condoms
Bulletproof condoms
Excellent info and presentation, but be careful, lately we do kill the messenger ;) since 300! lol
Wow, all of the batteries of a Tesla. Fit into the size of an
I-phone. That's crazy, really mind blowing.
Would finally solve the problem of an energy source for, say, an iron-man style exosuit.
All the moonlanding's control centre's processing power fit into pocket calculator.
Your 'The wonders of the Miracle Material ' animation have one free floating carbon atom (green dot not attached to anything) that got my OCD to next gear! 😂
Still dont understand why your channel its not viral. In my opinion its pure quality information in here.
comments like this keep me going. lets hope it happens so i can have videos on weekly basis.
Subject Zero Science just please dont stop. I found your channel recently and I was really amazed. Thank you for your work.
growth on TH-cam is usually exponential, slow growth at the start, then very fast growth.
Im an engineer, in 1990, (29 years ago) I worked for a company that made diamonds... diamond substrates. After about 1 1/2 years there, testing and developing, I came to work one day and was not allowed in. Men identifying themselves as FBI told me to go home and wait for instructions. I was told to return to work 2 days later to collect my things. The ENTIRE company was SEIZED, rolled up and taken away. That was 29 years ago... Has anyone seen a DIAMOND PROCESSOR in a computer or cell phone? NOPE, and you NEVER WILL. The Government has them though. Diamond can withstand heat hundreds of times better than silicone chips.. meaning MORE SPEED, FASTER COMPUTERS.
Graphene is no different. The explanation you are hearing here is quite old tech. The Government has been manufacturing high grade Graphene for more than 10 years now.
Fear not, remember everything is relative. During World War 2 'plastic' was NEW... a pound of plastic, as difficult as it was to manufacture at the time, was worth a pound go GOLD... Today, we make trash bags out of plastics.
The impact of Graphene is going to be epic. Light and transparent solar panels, and batteries will put EVERY oil company OUT OF BUSINESS.
Im aware of one instance of a company 3D printing a lithium type cell phone battery.... It had 10 times the capacity in the same area. That was only a first attempt.
Now imagine an electric car, with a graphene battery taking up the same area, with 10 times the capacity, attached to transparent solar panels in every window of the car.. AND embedded in the surface of the body panels. A car that you would never have to charge, unlimited travel distance. ALWAYS ON charging. Same with your house, these BIG UGLE SOLAR panels are OBSOLETE. Graphene solar will actually look like your roofing material, it will also be transparent, and in every south facing window of your home.
Graphene will change EVERYTHING.
Do you get retirement fund?, I heard someone story, quite similiar
Fuck off with the bullshit. Tons of companies make artificial diamonds. The government does not have magic diamond computers and magic graphene cars.
I was wondering why they don't dissolved the copper midway on the underside and roll it into a Brownian motion battery???
your channel is awesome , thanks , love it all
Korea has been doing this for a long time now. Good job "MIT"
Stellareffervescence source?
Where is this today I wonder.
I read the titles, to infinity and beyond.
Promising technology . Let's hope it does good on the Earth .
Really nice video!!! Do you use blender for the animations?
Thanks. Yes I use blender, been using it for over 10 years.
What would happen if our you relayered the graphene but offset the layers and pulled them through another layers larger gaps? Sort of like quilting it together.
Earned a new sub love it.
Chinese Reverse Engineering Department take notes about this
what about using flash graphene instead of methane??
What inventions humanity put into real life is just tiny fraction.
*Correction:*
5:11 Many _-times-_ *many* times
Planes & Planes 飞机 What’s wrong?
Great video, not great music. Your new videos are much better
Is Graphenoxide in bionthec and moderna and Jonson? Yes or No???
I'm not sure if I have the facts entirely clear but I was led to believe that to grow defect free graphene on a surface like copper then it first becomes a necessity to have a defect free copper surface. Is this correct or incorrect? It led me to think about how I could utilise 1~10nm copper nano particles plated in nickle to polish the copper surface with just enough abrasion to smooth out any defects but if the MIT guys have figured out how to do it using industrial quantities of copper film then that's pretty fantastic really.
Unless what they have is actually graphene sheet but which has defects but this doesn't detract from the accomplishment, it only means that with some additional quality assurance procedures they may very well have cracked the problem and that's fantastic.
From their paper, its not clear if its defect free. However they do mention that the copper was refined in order to optimize the production quality. To be honest we will eventually get there in terms of purity because there is a LOT of interest for this material, which I will talk about in later videos, so stay tuned.
I'm wondering a step further.....if a graphene belt could be utilized by depositing directly onto it, reusing the belt over and over, and simply use micro "scrubbers" to either remove all excess copper atoms after deposition but before burning, or to find another way. I'm thinking a graphene sheet as a substrate instead of copper might be beneficial.
If I am understanding your thinking correctly, if you deposited carbon atoms onto existing graphene then I would have thought the end result of this would be 2 layer graphene but separating one layer from the other without causing defect's would likely be problematic.
Need to find a similar method to apply to Carbon nanotubes.
Looking for that as well
Dude, you forgot the most interesting use of this technology :
Space elevators
Space elevators are supposed to be made by carbon nanotubes, not graphene.
Wait...carbon nanotubes are tubes made of a 1-dimensional layer of carbon whose atoms are arranged in a repeating hexagon pattern.
...That's what graphene is
@@slavkosky It may be possible to create carbon nanotubes from graphene, but it is far from obvious whether that would be the most efficient way to produce them.
There are better alternatives to space elevators, that only only require materials we already have.
- Skyhooks, for example.
- Ideally: Orbital ring(s) but... there will be still some time before those are economical. :D .... like 30 years or so XD -- really, though: orbital rings are awesome ^^
@@slavkosky Carbon Nanotubes are not graphene.
3:30 how the graphene domain size is controlled in R2R process?
I wonder if there's any way to get the roll of copper in and out of the gas chamber without leaking, something like pushing it through a bath of mercury (even though that would degrade the copper) such that your graphene would not be limited in length to the length of the copper roll. That way you could perhaps roll all the graphene into a pure graphene ring that could be used as a link in a super strong chain or something
Also I can see that if the copper doesn't need a seed, multiple domains of graphene would weed themselves at once and grow together. I would think there would be defects at the seams where the growing domains meet.
Both ends are in the vacuum and it unrolls from one end and rolls up on the other.
@@iamchillydogg precisely, the length of the ribbon is still limited to the space incide the starting vacuum chamber. I just thought it would be cool to be able to create an indefinitely long ribbon
Graphene + Solid State Battery = ultimate power source.
4:02 why they use CH4(methane) than CO2(carbon dioxide)? Itis less dangerous , more cheap and i think can be more pure(the molecule its smaller)
Another question the cooper band its charged with electric curent or samething? I ask it because that can help oriented and order the carbon(C) atoms.
The reason is that it takes more energy to break the CO2 bonds but I heard that they are working on some technologies to actually use CO2.
For your second question, its not charged, but i could be wrong. What they explain is that it is a property of the copper itself that facilitates the process when heated with temperatures of 700˚C+
@@SubjectZeroScience I heard that the reason why they can't make a space elevator out of this process is because, even though it is high quality... the space elevator ribbon needs to be perfectly made. Is there not some way they could inspect and correct the imperfections to create suitable graphene for a space elevator?
I wonder if it's possible to capture energy from craft re-entry into planetary atmosphere. It might offer some additional energy for planet side activity.
Amazing!!! I subbed :))
I had Russian subtitles, but I switched saw the second time and the subtitles disappeared. Why?
Imagine a plane made with graphene, graphene battery, graphene solar panels. That will run forever.
imagine graphene
You do know you're not a football commentator from the 50's right? You don't have to repeat the same tonal inflections over an over when you describe the subject.
I was going to comment on this ; it's really exasperating !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
personally I loved it, brings back a lot of good memories... Hockey Night in Canada, and the CFL commentary... ahhhhh, those were the days... or daze :D feel like some days I'm staring in a Sci Movie or TV show (My Favorite Martian) from the 60's... Why does Mars have a desert the size of several thousand Sahara's.... where is my flying car?? LOL...
yesterday I saw a kidney specialist, and he wasn't shocked or put a downer on my Longevity ideas, and he knew of Ray Kurzweil and Peter Diamandis and their work... he just said, you are in good health and we'll see about keeping you that way.... you just have to do the work of maintaining a good diet and exercise... and we'll monitor the rest... Gov't Medicare (we call it OHIP here in Ontario) is a miracle... by American SS Calculator I've got 15.5 years left to reach 86... by Canadian Stats, we add 3-4 years because of our health care system.... so figure near as makes no difference, 20 years, or 2038/9 for the average... I'll be 91... if you don't know what's coming, how can you take advantage of it... :D
Whereas I'm sure there are things to critique, it would be unfair not to note that every one has their own style.
Internet commenting etiquette for the win
@Tundra14 Agreed
Tell us when it leaves the lab.
How did you figure the energy density for a battery the size of an iPhone that would replace the batteries of a Tesla? I thought that the theoretical maximum for chemical storage was about the same as hydrocarbons, or perhaps a small multiple of that -- not orders of magnitude greater!
definitely not possible lol
Everything I have read about graphene batteries has a theoretical energy density about 10 times that of lithium ion. In other words, this guy is full of shit.
Interesting video,thank you....
Great video. Very clear and concise. Your 3D animations were very helpful. Thanks! 👍🏼👍🏼😁
0.11 typo. It say's roll to rool in beginning graphic.
I'm glad people are sharing their methods because I fear the day Graphene production gets patented by 1 company.
too late - Universal materials company ...flash joule heating method....
Where are you from, the owner of the channel?
and another question.
How they split the two elements? the graphene film from a cooper layer. what method can be used. its easy to do it and not make damge to the graphene or the roll cooper?
Apparently that is not the problem at all. From what i got form the paper, they are having trouble with the fact that the Graphene sheet roll onto itself. so its not sticky. I have to look more into this.
just compare graphene and cooper melting points.
2:30 End of intro, Summary of MIT invention starts
I'm mad I had actually thought about a process so similar last month, but at least it's made ;)
Me too
This video was made a year and a half ago
Can graphene be produced by laser sintering?
Yes, just not feasible for mass production.
Excellent!
Great! I subbed :)
Thanks man, I was feeling sad for only having myself as a sub! LOL
keep it up... subs are hard work these days :/
How do we invest in this?
Can you determine the orientation of the graphene Hexagons? I read in an article yesterday that the orientation pretty much determines the strength on tge graphene.
That's not quite how it works. The orientation is important, but only in the way that neighboring “hexagons” (what we call grains) need to be in the same direction for the crystals to fuse. If they are not, then the boundary will be weaker.
Very interesting
Make ships? How about a space elevator?
I was gonna say, ya it's kinda pointless to use space ships if you can make large scale graphene structures. Especially something as simple as a ribbon (albeit an insanely long one).
The power density claims are bunkers bro. Also, graphene is not qualified for reentry heat insulation...
Considering it barely exists that makes sense.
I think the secrete could be the extreme thermal conductivity, about 10 to 20 times of the copper. Then they could dissipate the heat with water vapor, before it could be burn in the air. But the heat energy produced is so big that even this may be impossible.
Can you make a video on space fountain
How does tis metod works?
Am I able to use this technique legally?
Yes, and technically it's not that expensive.
How do we make money investing into this?
Can't wait till we can roll regular thc also
Good info, but you need to do a reading check before publishing. There are a number of word use errors and misspellings.
Ow, I am aware of it. The problem is that when you finally upload it, you are just sick and tired of re-watching the video over and over again. specially when you do this after work. LOL
Sounds interesting. When d' y' think I could buy some on eBay? Just a thought.
You can but graphene nanoparticles on ebay now. The quality varies though.
I would like to know what has the author of these cool videos studied when he was in school...
great vid. I SUBBED!
Great video. Just CVD = chemical vapor deposition* and not deposit.
John Hart made the Roll-to-Roll scalable process in 2015 /:-\
Am I watching the turning point in the History?
Am I watching the end of Oil and Gas Industry?
If yes, then I am happy about it.
Congrats world, for cleaner world!
Till the batteries need recharging.
haha no
Great job! New sub...
I think your video is great and think graphene is future in every one's life and the many products that will never rust... Cars should never rust and the steel mills might not sell much. Refrigerators and washing machines won't rust. Older cars can be fitted with new graphene parts and the age of automobiles will go up. Just replace the worn parts and interior and you got yourself a new car with low property taxes. The Tax man ain't goanna like it and the electric cars can travel farther with this light structure Graphene. Thanks for the great video and when do you think the new batteries will hit the market? Home power for you home and hunting lodge in the woods and hills. Cheaper heat and cooling. Crank up the wind mill and charge things up. The future looks bright and all you tax slaves might have an extra dollar in your pocket when you retire. But watch out those jobs out there might not make the Standard of Living. children. Teach your well.
chemical vapor deposition ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
same thing yea i know
why the guy has only 10k subs??
Because this is not a news in science and engineering community.
Hurry up and figure out how to mass produce this material, I have a house design in mind.
Welcome to the electro-space age !
this is wrong in 2021 we learned that :
- we can produce grephen at large scale
- one iphone size graphen battery would cost a lot and would not store "a tesla" battery in terms of energy
- you cannot store energy for a long time (with pure graphene unfortunalty)
- silicon won't be replaced by graphen because it cannot "hold" information "long enough"
- much more stuff
But there are hope since other materals exists and AI can find most optimised for x purpuse !
Futur will be mindblowing, and futur is "almost" now !
Can you make a paint?
Now... they need to get SHELDON COOPER on the graphene sheet program. IT FLOWS throught the graphene.... LIKE A WAVE......