Why Logan Paul is WRONG About Nope (A Comprehensive Analysis)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ค. 2024
- Responding to Logan Paul's comments regarding Jordan Peele's new film, Nope. A few days after the movie's release, Logan Paul posted a Twitter thread explaining why Nope is the worst film he's seen in a long time.
I decided create a comprehensive analysis/rebuttal to all of Logan's questions and statements.
If you enjoyed the video, please leave a like and comment. Subscribe for new film and TV videos every week!
Follow me
➤ / heynarwhal
➤ Instagram: / heynarwhal
➤ Twitter: / heynarwhal
0:00 Start
0:27 Tweet 1
1:05 Tweet 2
1:52 Tweet 3
2:39 Tweet 4
6:47 Tweet 5
8:43 Tweet 6
9:47 Tweet 7
10:34 Tweet 8
12:19 Tweet 9
13:47 Tweet 10
14:12 Tweet 11
15:52 Tweet 12
17:26 Final tweet - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
Thank you for watching, friends! I'm so happy to be uploading TH-cam videos again. I had to take a few months to work on my mental health and figure out what direction I wanted to take this channel. It feels good to be creative again and I had a lot of fun making this video. If you enjoyed it, leave a like and comment what other videos you'd like to see from me!
the point of the alien eating the balloon is a Bad miracle, if the Gordy incident never happened that balloon would not exist.
The cinematographer did not fail the alien spit out the film and it rolled down the mountain watch it again.
And yet he forgets that he thought filming a dead man at the Aokigahara Forest was a brilliant way of achieving a spectacle.
Oop!
Right on the nail
I think that’s why he didn’t get it? He is literally the person obsessed with Spectacle. He is basically the TMZ guy on the motorcycle. Chasing the spectacle for fame, fortune, and celebrity. This film is partly about us and social media (tik-tok, IG, twitter, etc.) in general. Whether we realize it or not we are all somewhat drawn to the spectacle and it may lead to our undoing one day- if it hasn’t started already.
THANK. YOU. People seem to forget this and I understand people make mistakes however, it's very indicative of his character.
What does that have to do with him discussing his opinion on this movie? I fail to see a connection.
The fact that Logan, Who made a spectacle out of the suicide forest in Japan, doesn’t get what the film was going for is hilariously ironic.
He gets it, that’s why he hates it. Lol that man isn’t as dense as we think
You realize that what you said is a strawman argument, no?
@@willmurphy8650 Thats not even strawman argument Lmao.
Logan Paul is a clown. And he 100% is the TMZ guy on the motorcycle in this movie lol
Fuck LP
The abduction/digestion scene was the most horrifying thing I've seen in a movie ever. Absolute nightmare fuel
you mean that UFOGUSSY???
@@arendiaz3788 Jean Jacketussy
@@arendiaz3788 bruh no
Then by all means never watch "Fire in the Sky". Trust me. That was my traumatizing event.
@@ohc1492 why?
I am going to say something that I probably should not say, but: I think the movie went over Logan Paul's head, lol. And it's super wild because it's truly about people like him
i mean you aren’t wrong
That's fax. 📠
@@brucebobtrotter2170 I'm a cinephile and Nope was an excellent film. Just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean it sucks.
about people like him? what does that even mean? care to elaborate?
@@lifeisactuallyveryboring.7771 Ur making this movie be some fantastic masterpiece that is incredibly complex and if someone doesn't like it then that means they "didn't get it." U can like this movie and think it's a masterpiece, but it's not complex. It's a surface level movie. I enjoyed this movie, but it's a 7 at best. Can you explain what exactly I apparently "don't understand" about this movie?
I love how Logan Paul accidentally made the themes a lot more clear for people by being a living example of the caricatures displayed in the film... *chef's kiss*
Logan hating on a movie about people capitalizing on footage of traumatizing spectacles... but if the shoe fits...
The floating shoe or the spectacle!! You have no idea how brilliant your comment is.
OFCOURSE HE WOULD THINK IT SUCKS, he is literally all the bad characters in the movie that die
Isn't he the same guy that filmed a man who commited suicide in a forrest, edited the clip without removing that part and posted it on TH-cam?
Not the best sense of objectiveness, sorry..
Something that I'll add that I feel is important about OJ as a character is that he gives off neurodivergent vibes. I'm not the only one who's noticed this either, but it's nice to see a hero who isn't super charismatic and and loud. OJ is more quiet, reserved, he opens up around his family and those he knows but you can see him close up around strangers. When giving the safety meeting at the start of the film you see he has trouble making eye contact with the other staff members, he speaks low, he stumbles over the words. As soon as Emerald steps in he shuts out the rest of the world and focuses only on Lucky.
People are so used to movie protagonists being like Emerald, but we need people like OJ too. Some people struggle with social situations, and that's fine. It makes OJ more believable, more interesting, and more relatable.
I prefer movies with strong characters in the lead, not pussies..
interesting, but I would say that OJ is just shy, and not used to doing the talking, as that clearly was his father's role, and now that of his sister's. The idea that shyness is now being seen as 'neurodivergent' is a little troubling... I do see the value of the rest of your point, though and second it. We need more lead characters who are reserved, thoughtful and introverted. Not every 'hero' has to be a charming, charismatic extrovert.
I love how instead of making a review u just went after Logan Paul 😂
It was an easy entry point for a video lol
@@heynarwhal 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 so bogus, but so true! 🤣🤣🤣🤭🤣🤣🤣
Dude...who ACTUALLY likes Logan Paul?
@@jupitershanty it's like watching a train crash....it's sad what is happening....but you can't look away. 🤣🤦🏼♀️ He's a true example of, what happens if you don't save the money you create...you end up doing outlandish things to stay relevant. I can honestly say I never really gave him my time....but I know a lot of kids who do. 😵💫...one word describes him in my mind, and that is....'Eww'. 🤮🤣😆
Notice OJ doesn't look people in the eye but to save his sister he stares at the creature
“Waiting for the shoe to drop” very old saying
Why does it feel like Logan had a thesaurus open next to him while tweeting all that
Also I think it was said there was 4 different monkeys used in the show so unless he bonded with all 4 it was basically luck or a bad miracle
Thank you for going through point by point. Of course he wouldn’t understand a movie that is commenting on people like him. Also i think it’s pronounced Kaluyah not Kahlua
Logan doesn't understand it because the any of the characters he would relate to died stupid deaths
I think Logan’s point about why did nobody question the quarter in the sky meant why didn’t people within the film and the world of the movie question how a guy died from a quarter rather than why did none of the viewers not question it
That‘s how I understood him as well. It‘s still a nonsensical argument because in the context of the movie that‘s literally what happened. A guy did indeed die from a quarter. It‘s clearly visible and there‘s really no other explanation for his death. Plus OJ starts questioning where that quarter came from once he spots the UFO but a regular person wouldn‘t just assume that the quarter was send down by an alien creature resembling a UFO if an airplane is the more sensible assumption.
@@ft4709 no I don’t think anyones debating he died from the quarter as he clearly did, and OJ might have suspected it came from a UFO but one would assume that others in the area would find it strange a man was killed by a quarter from the sky as that’s not something I’ve ever heard of happening.
@@ft4709 and being killed by a UFO to an average civilian is not a sensible assumption
@@garrettspikes1267 Sure they‘d find it strange. Pretty sure that comes across in the movie. People, especially OJ, is confused by his fathers death. So what now? You investigate what exactly? OJ? What motivation is there for him to kill his father? And how and why would one kill a man by shooting a quarter into someone‘s eye? It being a weird-ass coincidence is the most logical explanation. Besides, what is Logan‘s point here? Does he wish for there to be a scene in which the police shows up and interrogates OJ? Such a scene would serve no other purpose than to elaborate what we already know. It would just exist to fill a plot hole that’s not actually a plot hole. We could just as well assume an investigation took place off screen during the titel sequence.
At the start of the film it's mentioned that the authorities theorized it from from a passing plane. Basically people dumping stuff down the toilet. After OJ first sees J.J. he mentions this again to Emerald, stating how this idea didn't make sense to him since airplanes don't even pass over their area. It's not that people didn't question how this happened, it's just that they came up with the most logical reason and brushed it off as a freak accident.
I've seen a lot of people talk about how wrong Logan Paul is, but , I haven't seen anyone talk about these comparisons or possible references
**SPOILERS**
Jean Jacket and The Thing are both shapeshifters. While JJ is not able to take human form like The Thing, we see it's "true form" at the end of the movie and it's definitely not just a flying saucer or a cloud and is able to make itself into various different shapes. JJ and The Thing are also both unable to digest metal and spits them out. Maybe I'm reading to far into this but this is what came to mind watching the video and the movie. ALSO Keith David is OJs father in the movie who plays Childs in The Thing
Thanks for the review. As for Logan Paul’s tweets, that old adage comes to mind about it being better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to talk and remove all doubt.
That quote was literally the first thing I thought when I read the first tweet.
Great comment
As for the shoe, I totally agree with the "Bad Miracle" interpretation but also, Jordan Peele is the master of incorporation of movie/music/pop cultural references. The shoe looks remarkably similar to the spaceship in the movie "Arrival". I think it was a direct nod to that film. As for the woman with the veil being there, the whole narrative is based off of the true story of a woman who had her face ripped off by her friend's pet chimp and then went on Oprah and was terribly exploited when she showed her face. The whole Gordy story is a very obvious and direct reference to the event and I LOVED how capturing the alien on film was named the "Oprah Shot". I mean, I'll admit that I wasn't that enthralled with Nope after I saw it but just like after I saw Us (and was somewhat disappointed after Get Out), I could not stop thinking about it!!! This is a movie (like Us) that demands multiple viewings and the watcher actually benefits from seeing it more than once. I am almost 100% sure that I am going to really start to appreciate it after a second watch. I think many films are made to bring the viewer back and watch it again because it's actually BETTER when you know the basic plot, premise and ending! But hey, it's not like I'm looking to Logan Paul for movie reviews or recommendations anyways!!!
Watch it again. So many metaphors in the film. Like when they eat at that burger joint after their second encounter with Jean Jacket. In the background you see a racial physical exchange outside the restaurant. And when they plan on encountering the alien again, they use monopoly pieces on the local map, a slight hint to them chasing money, or something like that idea.
Daniel was AMAZING in the movie he was just playing a character and he killed it!!! That's how his character was supposed to be stoic and he was brilliant!!!
Conspiracy Theory: Jordan Peele paid Logan Paul to promote his movie.
I‘m totally buying into this. There‘s no way Logan Paul is clever enough to play this well into the meta-themes of this movie. It’s just too big of a coincidence. And just way too funny.
I think jupe was feeding jean jacket horses AND humans since the creatures been spitting out coins and keys from the beginning of the movie, and the invite to OJ and Em to the park was to actually feed them to the creature since he wants the horses... but it backfires because jean jacket learned from the fake horse that it cant trust jupe anymore
The coin and key and other items at the beginning of the film were from the missing hikers in the news report.
@@carlgomberg i remember that too... but also when oj seen the alien come back when his sister was in the house, we can hear screams from peoples and also oj was staring at the lights from Jupiter's claim had went off before the alien got to him
@Ryoung404 you're referencing three different scenes at different points in the movie. The people screaming while it was over the house were the 40 people from Jupe's show who got sucked up, and the lights going out over the show were from a dress rehearsal they were doing where they presumably fed it one of the horses OJ had sold Jupe earlier.
Jupe treated the creature like Steve Irwin treated crocodiles. Supposedly, if crocodiles are fed or you feed them a chicken when you are in the enclosure with them, they won't go after you as a person. He figured as long as the horse was there as bait and food, he could lure it out to eat the horse and it wouldn't be interested in the people. But the plan backfired spectacularly.
@@carlgomberg ooh okay, i like that but yeah thats what i was referring to was the scene when ojs sister was playing the music loud and i just remembering hearing the screams at that point
Thank you for mentioning this!! I thought the same, that Jupiter was feeding the alien the audience, but no one brings it up. I have to watch it again, but I thought it was a distinct possibility. If it is the first show, I guess not. But if it is not, then why wouldn't the attendees be talking to the media? Why wouldn't there be talk of something happening at Jupiter's Claim? The other question would be if Jupiter is feeding the alien horses, why the hell would he be buying such expensive horses and not just knackered cows or something? I mean, these horses would cost tens of thousands of dollars, I believe. Not just horses, but trained stunt horses. That is the only part that doesn't add up for me. I guess one possibility is that the horses needed to be beautiful (for the spectacle/show aspect) and the timing of their sale was convenient. Poor horses... ☹
I may be reaching but on my second watch I realized that the three movie cameras at the set where Gordy is mauling the woman have two black dots/mechanical pieces that highly resemble the oblong alien masks with two little dots. I don't think there is a massive connection between the two but he has three kids. idk. Three kids with alien masks. Three cameras at the studio. There's three cameras used throughout the film (security, cinematographers film camera, and the flashing well). Three main characters. Three phases of the alien, : cloud, ufo, balloon octopus. Again that's probably a massive reach and wasn't super intentional but who knows
You highkey might be onto something
The alien costumes also seems to have the body of a chimpanze.
So, it wasn’t just me who notice the cameras with the two dots that resemble the alien mask? When they’re showing that scene I was like, wait? Those camera resembles the aliens mask but, I thought I was just reaching a little.
Dudebros always saying art is “objective” without having the slightest comprehension of filmmaking or artistic integrity
To be fair, I think Logan Paul's first point was why no one in the movie questioned it. It's still stupid. No one knew there was an alien. It's not the first thing that would spring to a person's mind, so of course airplane seems to be the most logical. Aside from that, oj mentions to his sister that the airplane excuse never really made sense to him, but what were his options aside from acceptance?
I have no idea why Logan is so desperate for people to care about what he thinks. First he wants to be an actor. THEN he wants to be a podcast comedian who does stupid things in public. THEN he wants to be a celebrity boxer. Guess what Logan, your credibility goes down with every major career jump, and your movie credit is a TH-cam Red Hunger Games knockoff.
I think this is a great video that we all needed tbh ...even if you think you understood the film chances are you didn't understand everything...and sometimes we need a Logan Paul to ask the dumb questions that we're too embarrassed to ask to really get some comprehensive answers
You would expect someone that loves Japan so much to appreciate the inherited art that NOPE has-
Oh.. wait..
I thought the director was also a sort of homage to the shark hunter from Jaws too. Both of them share a meal and sing the night before they die, and they both die chasing what they were after: the dolls eyes of the shark, and the impossible shot with the director.
Interesting point!
Great movie ! Everyone I’ve went to see it with has enjoyed it so far ! A lot of these points I picked up on with the first viewing but the movie becomes so much more clear on the 2nd and it surprisingly felt wayy faster on the second watch
I agree! Both times the movie felt way faster than it was, which I think is a good sign haha
You shouldn’t have to see a movie more than once to understand it
@@Ryan-sd4ir Never said such. Maybe you should give my comment a 2nd viewing and you’ll understand it better
@@LSPTaris becomes clear after a second watch lol. That’s not a good thing
@@Ryan-sd4ir That’s like saying you should fully understand every paragraph of a text book after the first read. Your perspective doesn’t hold up in any scenario.
No one even knew who Logan was until that suicide forest situation he was always in the shadow of his brother Jake now he stands out for horrible reasons but will also remain in the shadows no matter what he does of his brother anything he really says I really don't give a shit about and nobody else does either..... But great video really loved your take on the movie!
Also, just because an animal has an amazing ability like echolocation doesn't mean it can actually understand the physics of how the soundwaves interact with the world. It just uses the ability and lives its best life. Same with jean jacket. It creates an electromagnetic field that protects it from the various intelligent life it may encounter as it travels the galaxy, but it doesn't really understand the ability in any meaningful depth. The field might also help it fly. A lot of amazing evolution traits stat out as happy accidents.
Someone send this to Logan Paul.
You broke this down great! Idk how this man couldn’t understand this film lol
Thank you!
Sometimes your too close to the problem to take a step back and see that your actually apart of it
Especially with him doing what he did, you know, a spectacle; what the movie was shining a light on.
He didn’t understand it because he’s an out-and-out moron. It runs in the family
keep making this videos, even if they don’t get the views you want at first. it’s great content. keep following trends like this and i’m sure you’ll blow up in time!
Thank you for this comment, I really appreciate it! I'm planning on uploading regularly again
The Barbie ferreira question is understandable, but to me her inclusion just reflects the movies themes (like Logan Paul does) her entire career is a spectactle... she is an unconventional model, that was able to transition to acting... iits a miracle, it would be for anyone, but its also something that can be repeated, in the same way Jupes career is created in a similar way transitioning to films, then theme parks, then alien viewings. Whats most important though is that for any other things to work they have to be some kind of miracle
Ghost was the name of the white horse that is the first to disappear from the ranch. I think it's the same horse Otis Sr. is sitting on at the beginning of the film.
Hi! I'm a new subscriber. Totally enjoyed your breakdown. On another site it was mentioned that Gordy didn't attack Jupe because he didn't have direct eye contact due to the cloth in his line of vision; and Jupe was distracted by the shoe standing up. I believe that the shoe is not important. It was a distraction for Jupe and for us the audience. Not important.
If I'm being honest, I walked out of the theater very confused. After watching a 2nd time though, I quickly realized how much of a masterpiece this film really is. With that, I can literally talk about all the different facets of it for hours. But for anyone who didn't like it, I have one question.... SPOILER:
When you first saw that thing flying through the sky, what did you think it was made of? I already know the answer bc you thought the same thing that we all did....metal. You thought that it was a vehicle, piloted by little green men w/purple antennas. That reason alone should be good enough.
I dont get why everyone keeps calling the shoe a bad mirracle, it helped Jupe get his attentoin off Gordy, so a Good mirracle maybe??
Man I miss seeing that setup every Monday but I’m glad to see that your back!
AW thanks for watching! I appreciate it :D
Great analysis. Film is so much more then just shock and awe. And NOPE is a story full of detail and most film goers missed a lot of it on hope of the now norm jum scares and horror tropes. You're killing it.
When did Logan Paul become a film critic ? (Rhetorical) he should stick to what he does best…. Which is…. 🤷♀️
I believe Logan Paul posted those tweets in an attempt to piggyback onto the publicity of NOPE. His criticisms are idiotic and baseless, especially when you consider that he filmed dead bodies over in Japan. Hmm, spectacle much?
Me: watching this review like I’ve seen the movie
Also me: “hmm, good point. 🤔”
dont watch logan paul or this movie and you popped up in my recommendations and I clicked and actually watched so your doing something right man keep grinding
Aye I love hearing that, thank you so much for actually watching!
I really enjoy your context style, it makes the video interesting even though I don't really care about the movie. Been watching this channel ever since the podcast ended. I'm excited to see the new context that's in the works :)
Ditto
Point #8 i agree with u, but it's also very lame when producers put in actors as a cameo and give them 1 line. Why, well because they feel wronged when they are "PORTRAYED" to be a substaintial part of the movie and then end up just being a marketing ploy.
@Hey Narwhal I appreciate this analysis. So few people put any emphasis on this whole movie being about humans and their interactions with other animals. It might as well be a thesis for critical animal studies. Jean Jacket is just an animal, just as Gordy, the horses and human characters in the film are. There is no 'wild' or 'tamed'. A chimp is a chimp. At the same time, the movie is all about movie making, and the use of other animals throughout that entire history. The title cards (Ghost *is* a horse, by the by) evoke silent movies, or more arthouse films that display their artifice through the text titles of chapters. It also places a non-human animal as the subject, very much what films have not done throughout history. Peele destabilizes quite a lot in this film.
He also brings back the Black cowboy, a part of history that has been scrubbed, just as with the black jockey. OJ is a cowboy. He embodies the cowboy as created by Hollywood, and what we as the audience perceive as a 'cowboy'. He also, however, is the only character that meets 'animal to animal' with Jean Jacket. He gives the alien a name, further allowing him/her an identity and personhood. He establishes JJ's routines, likes, dislikes, etc. and how to interact with him successfully, i.e. without dying. OJ embraces the fact that he himself is an animal. His reserved nature and physical communication over verbal matches many people who work intimately with other animals. Mr. Paul's criticism of Kaluuya's 'vanilla acting' is just a very superficial observation of the actor's work. Kaluuya's performance is quite fitting to the character, but also draws a stark contrast to his sister and the other characters and how they choose to understand and respond to this animal in the sky. Everyone would have died without Otis, the alien whisperer.
There are so many things to think about, so many questions. Why was the sho standing up? To denote an anomaly, a flux, a paradox, a mystery. We don't know, and that is the whole point. It drives us. We *want* to know. The whole 'Nope' thing is the decision to NOT look, to NOT know. OJ rejects the desire to look at the spectacle in the sky, the thing he fears. He just says, 'nope, I'm not doing it.' Everyone is gobsmacked, looking at the thing of terror. One could argue that this is also about the spectacle of violence, and of violent acts against specifically Black Americans. The black history theme is already there. What happens when we choose to view these images of violent acts? This is also posed by the documentary maker while watching his animal on animal violence film clips. I don't have this worked out yet, but there is definitely something there.
There is just so, so much in this film, I just can't see how anyone can conclude that it sucks. You can not like it, but to say it is not a meaningful film is, well, dumb. One can layer so many different topics onto this film and it all makes sense. There are so many discussions woven into 'Nope'. That to me is the sign of a meaningful contribution to the collective.
Ghost what's the name of one of the horses
Tweet 3 : Logan is saying why wouldn't the people in the film, law enforcement, the doctors be curious about how a man died with a coin in his head, or why multiple coins and metal objects fell from the sky. You missed the point of his tweet.....
I love how the move legit just went over his head.
No mention of even how the Gordy scene and the lasso experience or TMZ biker dude was a legit call out to what he represents
Logan pal is the biker in the helmet.
Damn social media go away!!!!!
WOW!
You're so on point with Nope.
Brilliant and well done.
Keep moving forward ❣️
Logan is slow😂
Love the video keep it up man happy your feeling better loved pims but totally understand that it's what you guys needed
Someone may have pointed this out already, but Ghost was the name of the white horse. Also, I believe the animal referenced in each title card ends up dying in that act, if I'm remembering it correctly.
Waiting patiently for part 2: a comprehensive analysis that explains why his life is wrong as well.
Loved this movie regardless of some things going over my head at first. I wanted to find a video that broke down certain aspects that could explain some of these things and when I saw the name "Logan Paul" I knew it was going to have to be broken down like youre trying to explain something to a five year old, so I KNEW this would be a very comprehensive explanation, and I really appreciate that this was the first and only video I had to click to get some of my curiosities answered aswell as possible takes on other scenes through out the movie. thank you for uploading this!
Nice breakdown! Agree 100%. After just seeing Nope for the 3rd time, I have a lot of love for this film and for me did need multiple viewings, but awesome regardless!!
Oh and you have some great ideas I didn't consider...thanks!
Never wanted to punch a hypocrite in the face so bad my teeth and gums are pulsating. The balls on Fake Paul with his arrogant I know everything wanna be click bait movie critique as if he’s a good source for it and thinks his fans want to know what he thinks . Man i’m just gonna tell myself he is trolling because if he’s being dead serious the thought of that makes me so angry lol I needa chill.
It’s the type of people who say “this person is “wrong” because” like STFU everyone has their own fucking options, that doesn’t mean the first thing outta your mouth is calling Logan “wrong” or “stupid” for not liking this 1 specific movie grow up people
Who cares about what this... 'Logan Paul' thinks? Why should it matter? Who's that guy? "Nope" is a freakishly clever film, and a masterpiece.
look man I just watched this movie and I have my own questions about it. I’m not going to defend whichever Paul brother made this review but I do think it’s a bad sign when someone has to do research or homework on your movie to make full sense of it. Like movies can be complicated and need further digging into but even if you don’t understand you can still get a sense of whether all the themes work and relate to each other well. My personal opinion, my opinion, the thoughts and feelings inside of my mind, again just to clarify my opinion. Is that the movie was good but it’s weaker moments came whenever I felt like there was a message or something symbolic because those scenes were done in a way that to me, felt like it was taking time away from the main story instead of complimenting it. Like the scene with the scarred costar threw me off because it reminded me of the “detour” in the movie that never really led anywhere, I genuinely felt like it was shock value for shock value’s sake, just for her to get eaten and die, like okay cool I guess. Also the cinematographer got really weird at the end and I feel like I only think it was weird because that particular moment wasn’t really set up that well. It felt like they cut some of the scenes from that moment in the final edit because the movie acts like we’re supposed to know why he just decided to suddenly lose his mind. It’s a good movie I can’t hate and the highs were definitely high but yeah it also had some speed bumps along the way too
So, I've not seen Nope but I have been watching the dissection (I work alot) and I still feel that Logan Paul either understood the movie but thought he'd get more attention being glib about it or he's exactly as I expect he is (filming bodies in the woods).
Kudos for attempting to make thoughtful content!
Shoe could be an homage to Kubrick's monolith for obvious reasons
Logan was right. I don’t know what movie you watched. It was highly pretentious and over indulgent. A lot of subplots and no carry through on the main plot. So many parts that never connected. I could go in in detail but it’s a waste of time. The thing that pissed me off the most was the waste of an iconic Akira shot. That was the moment I hated this movie.
Movie is absolutely slow and drags around. It's like Tarantino directed it. It's 2022 nobody has time or patience to sit and watch them drag around on screen trying to portray some mystic BS and plant subliminal motives. Peel should have gotten over himself and made a fast paced likable movie about UFOs. This was like a War and Peace drama. Like I watched all Lord Of The Rings combined.
people have the right to like and dislike things
He has the right to dislike the movie
And we have the right to dislike him
Thats just how it is
What do you think Logan Paul's favorite movies are?
Who cares really what Logan Paul says? I mean he can't even use the word objectively correctly. Nope wasn't what I was expecting, which was a good thing IMO. It's not some overplayed alien movie, it had a surprising amount of layers that had me thinking about what it all meant for some time after.
This was a really good TH-cam video. Strongly agree with you here.
Thank you for the kind words, I'm excited to make more like this!
Tweet 8 was really helpful thank you I thought I was the only confused about the Gordy incident. 🤣🤣
When he actually picks a actual career. Then maybe I'll acknowledged him as a source of senseable information.Untell then, if he can't connect simple theme plots🤷🏾♀️. I am simply unable to care about anything he has to say. Nope is amazing, Love your channel BTW❤
Great post! Paul appears to have been clocked in the head to much! Stop playing boxing! Your not Barry Norman ( 🇬🇧 ref google him)
Also if you hated it so much why the multiple tweets on in!
Tell you what Jordan peel has made as many films as you’ve had crap fights
Switch up! And play pretend being Spielberg
Yer!!?
Thanks for the video! Really informative!
why do we even give him attention
I don't really like Logan Paul (I don't know much about him though) but that's his opinion. Maybe he could have been a bit more respectful of the work put in the movie (even though I kind of think he was respectful enough) but ultimately that's just his (subjective of course) opinion. I liked "Nope". I liked it first and foremost as a suspenseful thriller (which was visually beautiful too) and missed many of the symbolisms. After looking the film up, I was introduced to its really rich themes. Some of them I liked and said "wow that's deep", others I just considered overanalysing of the movie. But I can't blame anyone that wasn't really invested upon them, or even cared about them. Cinema is an art and is subjective. Yes there are very annoying films that most people would consider bad and many great films that most people consider good. But that doesn't mean all people. I know it's difficult not to get annoyed by someone really disliking a film you loved, and him being vocal about it for reasons you consider "wrong". But as I said art is subjective and his opinion isn't less valid than your or mine. Yes, film critics exist and they know more about Logan Paul about cinema. But just because a movie is considered good by them, doesn't mean you would like it. Isn't there a single movie labelled great by most critics and people that you found boring or just bad? If so then do you believe that you are wrong and your opinion doesn't matter.
To sum up, I believe your video is unnecessarily harsh on him for this, especially when you start it with a definition of "objectivity" - yes he shouldn't have said objectively slow either. But no, his views aren't just wrong. It would be really hypocritical to say that.
Lastly I want to say that I am writing this with no malice, and I am sorry if it came off mean. I want to believe that I am just criticising your video respectfully and if you or anyone else wants to reply to me, please do accordingly.
great video.... one thing though, the sloth in the back ground is freaky! gives me chills....
To be honest, I have no idea who Logan Paul is and I don't care. He is either feigning stupidity to spark a reaction (success!) or he is just truly an idiot. Private idiocy is fine, but as soon as someone displays idiocy to profit from it, I feel free to call it out. Maybe some people just don't deserve to understand and appreciate some films.
OK I'm up to tweet 2 in this video and already you got something painfully incorrect. Logan isn't asking why the VIEWER wasn't curious about the coin and the key, he's asking why the CHARACTERS were not. Obviously it's clear to the viewer. There are lots of questionable character motivations and reactions in this film. Not off to a good start, mate.
Liked the content, loved your face. Subscribed.
Oh shoot, beat me to it man! But great content, keep it up!
Thank you bro, same to you! I really enjoyed your video :D
People keep bringing up the suicide forest as if its correlated to the film, sort of but not really. I think it's time to let it go.
Logan Paul doesn't understand a movie about exploitation 🤣🤣🤣☠
Love this video, thanks
Spot on. I loved this movie.
It's my 2nd favorite on the year! Behind Everything Everywhere All at Once
This was one of the worst half baked crazily written inconsistent movies I have ever seen. Get out was awesome but Jordan duped me twice with US and Nope smh. This guy is like m night shyamalan.. Over hyped garbage and waste of time. These movies now are for stupid no questions asked netflix watchers
Because Logan is jealous of other people success
And that pepole like the success!
@@adrianwallerborg8865 wtf is a pepole?
@@dirtygirl2808 people
Logan Paul is 100% not WRONG. He gave his opinion which everyone is entitled too. Just because he didn't like it and you did, it doesn't make him wrong. I thought the movie was pure 100% garbage and that's only my opinion. For the people who loved the film, all power to you. You are not wrong for liking the film. It's all about someone's personal taste.
Well, except that Logan was actually wrong about multiple things. Sure, some of his opinions are subjective, but things like "Why have a cameo? This makes for bad movie" is pretty stupid when cameos happen in movies and film all the time.
I feel like “worst” is overused imo
so funny Logan Paul wrote that tweet. movie is about him
I i=think the movie trusts it audience to be smart
Logan has never heard of dying for there art.
Nice to see you back
Thanks Noah!
this man is on his knees for this movie so much I'm surprised ur knees arent hurting
No one cares what Logan Paul says. His opinion has no value.