@@kindabananas do not think people hate her, most thought she was terrific at first, everyone agrees she is beautiful.....just wish she could find happiness in a quiet and private life instead of trying to hang on to the Royalty gig.
@@kindabananas So…the reason the imaginary children are never seen is because their “parents,” the two biggest camera hogging and fame hungry liars, grifters, and opportunists ever to exist, are concerned about their “privacy and security” and are “protecting” them from nonexistent threats? Are the sugars also of the belief that normal people are as gullible as they are?
@@tishapratt9139Hang on to the royal gig?? She is in fact married into the royal family. When you dis her, you are dissing the whole royal family, including Princess Diana, who even though has passed, is Meghan's mother in law.
If you don’t care then, why do you watch the video and leave a comment? Actions speak, louder than words and your actions are giving obsessed. Maybe get a hobby?
@@erikacrews1338it was a photo of a legit child when it was taken, over two years ago, and before it was photoshopped. A legit child that isn’t Harry and Meghan’s.
Yes we do! Either stay out of the spotlight altogether OR show us a few pictures! It's ridiculous to only have one picture of Lilibet from 2 years ago and NOTHING ELSE! 🤷♀
MO - Harry is blood! What are you talking about about? Just because he lives in California does not mean he is not the grandson of the Queen...... he is royal blood, regardless of the azzhole that he is.
Because Harry and Meghan get views. End of story. Stopping engaging if it bothers you so bad. Everyone knows there’s an algorithm and if you’re consistently watching videos about Harry and Meghan, you’re gonna see more videos about Harry and Meghan.
Seriously why do you cover Rachel Meghan Markle and her children(?), she left the Royal Family after hurting staff and the Queen and Prince Phillip????? Endgame the book even accused the King and Princess of Wales of racism!!!!
Because Megan gets views. Obviously, cause you’re here, leaving comments lol. don’t engage if you hate it so much. Actions speak louder than words and your actions are giving obsessed.
@@erikacrews1338 I expressed my opinion that Prince Harry and Rachel Meghan Markle have left the Royal Family and shouldn't be a topic of a channel covering the Royal Family. I also firmly believe that Rachel Meghan Markle has proven through her actions towards the Royal Family and her own Family that she should be held accountable for her actions and not swept under the rug.
There is no consistent or reliable evidence that "Lilibet" - as their biological daughter - even exists. Why are they not posting new pictures with full frontal imagery of their children's faces? Where are the children?
That's a silly attempt to bait them into the limelight. If y'all weren't calling her an attention seeker every time she pops her head out to say hello, maybe we'd have tons of updated photos by now.
There’s no consistent and reliable evidence that anybody is anyone’s children unless there’s some type of DNA test. Why is it different for Harry and Meghan? The Royal family and the royal family channel has all admitted that this child exist and y’all still over here acting dumb.
Where does it say that you can’t be in princess unless you were born in the UK? Not you making up lies just to be mad about something that doesn’t even affect you. You really think the royal family and the royal family channel would acknowledge a child that doesn’t exist? Are you that dense?
This child, who has never been to the United Kingdom, can not be a princess no matter the bureaucracy. Shame on the awful couple to have stained Her late Majesty's name like that.
@@melody.rose. @erikacrews1338 said there was literal proof of Invisibilily visiting the UK, she then went on to say "Do some research". Which is a typical response when someone can't find any proof.
Guess it's to "Shine a light " on the tangled Web Hairy wrapped himself in ,regardless of the wise advise his lifelong mates tried to assist him with. At least he gets chance to wear his medals occasionally, the 3 attendancy medals his "commander in Chief presented him with . 3 medals for attending 3 Jubilees ,now that's really thriving ,bless him
Same old pic of Rentibet! Please stop giving those people or their supposed offspring any type of acknowledgment on your channel. They haven’t earned your respect or forgiveness. They also haven’t earned the respect or forgiveness of the good people of the UK either.
Non of your business rented or not paid for or not excist or not. NON OF YOUR BUSINESS. You are not a stakeholder of their lives. The ones who are being invested in are the three in london. They HAVE! to be SHOWCASED every year a few times. Those are the ones that you are paying for
@@maryjones8554 Of course! And also because they are so envious and copycats. They put her own daughter in an uncomfortable position with regard her cousin.
There WAS no child born at that "boutique" Santa Barbara hospital. The college-aged surrogate gave birth at UCLA Medical Center to a female named Diana Mary, and upon discharge, the birth mother fled with the child to Colorado, where Harry had absolutely ZERO chance of enforcing a surrogacy agreement, since he has NO biological ties to the child!
@@annhenry7948 Definitely not Cottage hospital, since my cousin knows a nurse who works in the NICU at that hospital, who said that Snarkle ABSOLUTELY DID NOT GIVE BIRTH THERE! Now channel creator Paula M. allegedly found a birth record at UCLA Medical Center for a child born on or about "Markle's" due date, and given the birth name of "Diana Mary," alleged to be the child born to the SECOND SURROGATE. That birth mother is alleged to have fled to Colorado, where Harry had LESS THAN ZERO RIGHTS, because he has ZERO BIOLOGICAL TIES to EITHER this "Are chee" or "Lill ee."
She was not named after the queen because the Queen's name is not Lilibet. Princess Beatrice's child is named after Queen Elizabeth, so is Zara's and Peter's. And of course there's Princess Charlotte. In fact Zara's name is Zara Anne Elizabeth. Harry and Meghan made a joke out of the entire process.
@@celissolarte Veo que el inglés no es lo tuyo… Yo dije que “no es real”, o sea que no existe! (porque todo el mundo sabe que son muñecos/photoshop y/o niños prestados para las fotos). No dije que no fuera una “royal”. “Royal” ≠ “Real”
@@erikacrews1338prove a birth certificate than ! According to British law there needs to be proof of birth to be in the line of succession to the throne !
@@txkitkat1307 yeah and the only people that need that proof is the royal family, which is why Harry and Meghan’s kids are on the royal family website. You can go check or I guess you can keep being delusional if you want.
You think you’re the only person with the name Missy? Your mom recycled your name but Meghan Markle giving her kid a name that already exist is stealing? It’s givingracist.
The child was named as a slam to Queen Elizabeth! That name was never supposed to be used again after Prince Phillip passed away! Totally disrespectful of both Meghan and Harry!
Get off the slow bus because the author stated QEII was very delighted having a great granddaughter named Lilibet after her and that the UK media misconstrued what he stated in the book.
@shonnie8361 No she was delighted for them to name her great grandchild Elizabeth after her. Just like the other 30 grandkids and great grandkids. You should know this by common sense because her name is not Lilibet.
@zoidmo3388 Why aren't you asking where George is? The answer to your question is during the day they are at school which started back up on Monday. Why are you stalking children?
I just can't stand that Harry and Meghan have not released any pictures of Lilibet. We just have this one picture of her at about one year of age plus some baby photos. We do not know what she looks like at age 3! ☹
You have bigger things to worry about if you're so bothered about a child who isn't even yours. Why do you feel so entitled to photos of a 3 year old little girl, you're such a creep
An intemate family party ,what family ?,one grandmother no grandfather no grandmother no great uncles no great aunts no aunts ,uncles,cousins, second cousins god parents nursery friends neighbours my my what a gathering that must be.
There is only one Lilibet and she is Queen Elizabeth lll ! Team Catherine, Princess of Wales 🏴 Prayers for Catherine and King Charles as they continue to recover from cancer.
Why are you posting about a child that has not ever been seen by any of our beloved RF and very likely is not born of M body. First of all proof and DNI
3 yr olds love intimate parties. What they don’t like is inviting all their friends from playgroup with their Mums, hiring a bouncy castle and a clown, then running round like tornados for 2 hours in a massive group sugar high!
THIS PICTURE OF A SMALL CHILD IS NOT LILIBET….IT IS THE PHOTO OF A CHILD MODEL..THIS CHILD WAS POSING FOR PICTURES BEFORE LILIBET WAS BORN IF THERE EVEN IS A CHILD NAMED LILIBET…
@@erikacrews1338this isn’t the royal family’s channel. This is a fake “royal family” propaganda channel, run by itn. There is no acknowledgment from the royal family about this imaginary kid’s “third birthday.” How many times do you need to be told that? 😆🤡
@@Ker-mk3bf Princess Lilibet and Prince Archie are also the direct lineage of King Charles. To ignore this fact, just because you are jealous of their mother is absurd. Those innocent kids did nothing to you.
@@VictoriousSageno one wonders why Harry and Meghan “keep their kids hidden.” They don’t have kids to keep hidden, their “kids” don’t exist. The reason the imaginary children are never seen is because their “parents,” the two biggest camera hogging and fame hungry liars, grifters, and opportunists ever to exist, are concerned about their “privacy and security” and are “protecting” them from nonexistent threats? Are the sugars also of the belief that normal people are as gullible as they are?
Why is it you don’t hold H&M accountable for what they do and don’t do? What the point? No one believes a word that they say and no one believes what their mouth pieces say either. Someone needs to tell the truth.
Are you seriously on a podium speaking for everyone? saying ' no one believes a word' 'no one believes what their mouth pieces say either" You are accountable for your delirium.
@@Ker-mk3bf You don't run this channel and nothing they said goes against TH-cam guidelines. You just made baseless claim yourself. People have the right to their own opinions and that is allowed on TH-cam.
You haven't seen Charlotte or Louis and please spell his name correctly but other people have including their entire school so why are you being a perv?@@erikacrews1338
NO new picture at all. I almost forgot that MM was suppose to have kids, I still have my doubts that she carried them in her tummy. I agree that she is not named after the late queen at all, she does however have Lady Di name at least. I feel sorry for those kids. Would like to see DNA results as well.
@zoidmo3388 Why aren't you asking where George is? The answer to your question is during the day they are at school which started back up on Monday. Why are you stalking children?
@theres...Are you claiming you've seen the birth certificates of George, Charlotte, Louis or/& you've seen their DNA profile forms to prove their bloodline. But, I get it. You only have a hatefilled soul for H&M. You're an embarrassment to Canada.
Actually the birth certificates of George, Charlotte, and Louis are online. I believe that Archie's is also online, but it seems to keep changing every few months.@@zoidmo3388
Outside the spotlight? Weird, when you know that all Sparry and Megaliar want is being in the spotlight. No current or recent photos of either child suggests they do not exist… IMO
Harry and Meghan are not in the spotlight as much as you think. The British media can’t stop talking about them because they’re obsessed making it seem like they’re always doing something and they’re not.
@@txkitkat1307 The First Lady of Nigeria made a statement that she never said anything about what Megan was wearing. Not you showing me that you believe the toxic media and didn’t actually do your own research before speaking on some thing you know nothing about.
@@erikacrews1338 the Brit media are paid NOT to print stories regarding 'Where's Kate/Catherine?' 'where's Charlotte and Louis' It's why they put fake sightings of them. The media have to feed the gullible monarchist🐑 lies about H&M..bullying their children by untruths as if it's a right. Crazy hatefilled souls.
you must be sorry for George, Charlotte, Louis bec they have a mom being represented by an actor @ the market and an AI park bench vid and sinks lower by photoshopping ultered mother's day pic of them with the missing Catherine. So much hypocritical sheep here commenting.
Zoidmo When you get the subpoena that you're being sued for defamation of character and slander you will have proof of every single thing you wrote here correct? Because otherwise you're going to lose everything you've ever worked for.
I’d truly appreciate not seeing anything related to the California grifter’s here. I want to hear and see the real royals and what they’re doing. Don’t pander to them please!
An intimate party to celebrate the birthday of a child who is a ghost. There must be a reason why the children are hidden. I believe they simply don't exist. Use borrowed photos to show ghosts.
You'll be real happy simon, when Catherine's 👻shows up for Halloween. Must be a reason she's hidden & no live sightings. AI, actors, photoshopped old mom day pics are the only thing out there. Non existing? btw, Where's Charlotte and Louis? talk about ghosts.
@zoidmo3388 Why aren't you asking where George is? The answer to your question is during the day they are at school which started back up on Monday. Why are you stalking children?
I didn’t even want to click on this but I had to see it to believe it. This is THE SAME RECYCLED PHOTO we have seen over and over!! Who are they kidding? I also can’t believe this wonderful channel is putting out this garbage.
This isn’t a “wonderful channel.” It’s a fake “royal family channel,” run by itn. It’s mostly Harry and Meghan propaganda. The _actual_ royal family channel is just called “The Royal Family.”
@@dazza9326 lolol Truth annoying you? She is a classic narcissistic sociopath and you are just another nieve follower!! That is a professional opinion!!!
@dazzy...You obviously do care by commenting. I know what you mean though. We've been shown fake Kate/Catherine constantly for 6 MONTHS and she herself admitted she photoshopped/ultered her very own YRS PAST mom's day pic with her kids. That is a new level of low. Where is she anyway?
No new photos,HOPE PRINCESS CATHERINE GETS BETTER SOON
Did you actually believe there would be new photos?
@@winterlight4521 there are no old ones.
I guess not,😊 but it ďrives me crazy!
No sightings of her for the summer so come halloween you may be lucky 👻Catherine sighting.
@@zoidmo3388Are you expecting sightings of harrys toddler ,good luck with that .
Very intimate party. No kids no guests. No 3 year old picture of invisible child. What a shocker
Archie had an intimate party too. It must be the latest Hollywood trend.
why would she show you disgusting people her child? Just another thing for people who hate her to judge her on
@@kindabananas do not think people hate her, most thought she was terrific at first, everyone agrees she is beautiful.....just wish she could find happiness in a quiet and private life instead of trying to hang on to the Royalty gig.
@@kindabananas So…the reason the imaginary children are never seen is because their “parents,” the two biggest camera hogging and fame hungry liars, grifters, and opportunists ever to exist, are concerned about their “privacy and security” and are “protecting” them from nonexistent threats? Are the sugars also of the belief that normal people are as gullible as they are?
@@tishapratt9139Hang on to the royal gig?? She is in fact married into the royal family. When you dis her, you are dissing the whole royal family, including Princess Diana, who even though has passed, is Meghan's mother in law.
That picture is a couple of years old! 🙄
Essa foto visivelmente foi manipulada. Os braços e o sorriso dessa criança , chega ser assustador. Foto fake!🤡🥱
It sure looks like the same photo
You baby haters ought getting anymore than that.
@@BeautifullyMixed72 👍 exactly.
@@BeautifullyMixed72 You make no sense whatsoever. 👩🦲
She hasn't aged a day! 🤣
She has. Just because you’re not seeing her age doesn’t mean she’s not aging lol. Do you honestly believe things only exist if you see them?
@@erikacrews1338like Catherine’s health?
Where’s Lilly?
@@erikacrews1338Do you honestly not get that it was a joke? Christ. It’s not difficult to figure out
@@SandraLane-qc6io at least get the name spelled correctly as Lili . Where's Catherine? Where's Charlotte? Where's Louis.
You need to Prove this child is a R F before you can expect people to care and at this point we dont care
You are speaking for yourself. Scorn in your heart, especially about an innocent child, can be a poisonous thing.
@@janedoe327. Meghan had a hysterectomy in her early twenties. The child doesn’t exist.
How rude
Those are the King's grandchildren, whether you believe it or not
If you don’t care then, why do you watch the video and leave a comment? Actions speak, louder than words and your actions are giving obsessed. Maybe get a hobby?
Why is this photoshopped picture still being used? I thought altered pictures were taboo or is only for the Prince and Princess of Wales?
Sick of seeing this photo of a doll!
@@sandraevans6066 you’re delusional if you think that’s a doll and not a legit child.
Photoshopped and altered.
@@erikacrews1338it was a photo of a legit child when it was taken, over two years ago, and before it was photoshopped. A legit child that isn’t Harry and Meghan’s.
Same old photo
We don't have to wonder why though.
Why are you showing Hartford Schroeders photo?
Where's Lillys photo?
😂🤣😆😅
🙄‼️
Diana Mary's photos are with her biological mother in Colorado.
🧸
I think we need to see NEW pictures of the children??
Why cause you’re a pervert?
Yes we do! Either stay out of the spotlight altogether OR show us a few pictures! It's ridiculous to only have one picture of Lilibet from 2 years ago and NOTHING ELSE! 🤷♀
What children?
@@lily_m3538 not yours clearly. Maybe stop obsessing over children that aren’t yours because it’s giving pervert.
There are no children
THEY ARE NOT PART OF THE ROYAL FAMILY….. DONT LIVE ON GREAT BRITAIN….WHY YOU GIVE THEM TIME AND SPOTLIGHT????
MO - Harry is blood! What are you talking about about? Just because he lives in California does not mean he is not the grandson of the Queen...... he is royal blood, regardless of the azzhole that he is.
Because Harry and Meghan get views. End of story. Stopping engaging if it bothers you so bad. Everyone knows there’s an algorithm and if you’re consistently watching videos about Harry and Meghan, you’re gonna see more videos about Harry and Meghan.
Seriously why do you cover Rachel Meghan Markle and her children(?), she left the Royal Family after hurting staff and the Queen and Prince Phillip????? Endgame the book even accused the King and Princess of Wales of racism!!!!
Because Megan gets views. Obviously, cause you’re here, leaving comments lol. don’t engage if you hate it so much. Actions speak louder than words and your actions are giving obsessed.
@@erikacrews1338,
I normally don't reply to other's comments.
This time I will make acception
How leaving @Ker-mk3bf alone
@@Linda356 it’s hilarious to me that you think that I actually give AF!
@@Ker-mk3bf how can they be failures when you’re literally obsessed with them?
@@erikacrews1338 I expressed my opinion that Prince Harry and Rachel Meghan Markle have left the Royal Family and shouldn't be a topic of a channel covering the Royal Family. I also firmly believe that Rachel Meghan Markle has proven through her actions towards the Royal Family and her own Family that she should be held accountable for her actions and not swept under the rug.
You used to give actual ROYALS content. I never watch fake 'news'. Unsubscribing.
How is this fake news?
Fantastic unsubscribe
c ya
yes because one person unsubscribing is definitely going to ruin them
There is no consistent or reliable evidence that "Lilibet" - as their biological daughter - even exists. Why are they not posting new pictures with full frontal imagery of their children's faces? Where are the children?
🙄‼️
It's because of haters like you that they don't show their children
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
That's a silly attempt to bait them into the limelight. If y'all weren't calling her an attention seeker every time she pops her head out to say hello, maybe we'd have tons of updated photos by now.
There’s no consistent and reliable evidence that anybody is anyone’s children unless there’s some type of DNA test. Why is it different for Harry and Meghan? The Royal family and the royal family channel has all admitted that this child exist and y’all still over here acting dumb.
Why do you have this on a so called Royal channel? They are no longer Royal.
Yes, they are royals. They’re just not working members of the royal family, but they are royal.
Harry might be a blood Royal, but MM is a Royal pain.
@@SandraLane-qc6io and how do you know that?
@@YusufYusuf-ti2rz For one, by the look on the late Queen’s face during the wedding to Harry!
@@SandraLane-qc6io really she seemed happy to me
How can this supposed child, lily, be a princess in the british monarchy when she is an american born citizen?
Is she not royal blood? Is her father not the grandson of Queen Elizabeth?
Where does it say that you can’t be in princess unless you were born in the UK? Not you making up lies just to be mad about something that doesn’t even affect you. You really think the royal family and the royal family channel would acknowledge a child that doesn’t exist? Are you that dense?
@@oneitalia2312 Does she really exist?
@@oneitalia2312,Likely not. DNA needs to be done. Look up Lady Colin Campbells photo of Archie baby bump… between MeGains KNEES.
Why does it matter ppl are sick
This child, who has never been to the United Kingdom, can not be a princess no matter the bureaucracy. Shame on the awful couple to have stained Her late Majesty's name like that.
There is literal proof that she’s been to the UK! Do some research and stop believing everything you hear.
@@erikacrews1338
"Do some research," which translates as "I couldn't find anything. And I'll be amazed if you do".
@@SelinaBarton-ij5izwhat's this about? I can't see the original comment.
@@melody.rose.
@erikacrews1338 said there was literal proof of Invisibilily visiting the UK, she then went on to say "Do some research". Which is a typical response when someone can't find any proof.
@@SelinaBarton-ij5iz LOL! that's nice. I sense it's an American trying to "protect" Meghan.
These pictures are very very old.
If H and MM are raising their children out of the spotlight, why are you reporting on this?
Guess it's to "Shine a light " on the tangled Web Hairy wrapped himself in ,regardless of the wise advise his lifelong mates tried to assist him with. At least he gets chance to wear his medals occasionally, the 3 attendancy medals his "commander in Chief presented him with . 3 medals for attending 3 Jubilees ,now that's really thriving ,bless him
Same old pic of Rentibet! Please stop giving those people or their supposed offspring any type of acknowledgment on your channel. They haven’t earned your respect or forgiveness. They also haven’t earned the respect or forgiveness of the good people of the UK either.
LOL “Rentibet” 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
Always the same picture. Are there not any new pictures
You mean the rented "Lilibet?"
Non of your business rented or not paid for or not excist or not.
NON OF YOUR BUSINESS.
You are not a stakeholder of their lives.
The ones who are being invested in are the three in london. They HAVE! to be SHOWCASED every year a few times. Those are the ones that you are paying for
@john_cockpit that's interesting, one comment up you said YOU were paying for them. Now we're paying for them. You're a joke.
The only thing that's paid by the people is security. Everything else they take care of.@@john_cockpit
@@aerialpyropewpewIgnore that John “person”. It’s a fake bot Meg troll. 😂
You need to stop watching 80s Wall Street movies.@@john_cockpit
I hate she stole the name from the Queen.
Stole? Your mom stole someone's name too. You aren't the first Jacqueline.😂
I wonder why they copied the name from his niece Princess Charlotte: Charlotte ELIZABETH DIANA? 🤨
@@anacatalinalopezlutz3143because they can call their daughter any name they like!
They have no respect for anyone , only themselves
@@maryjones8554 Of course! And also because they are so envious and copycats. They put her own daughter in an uncomfortable position with regard her cousin.
I’m unsubscribing too. Clickbait
Good!
c ya.
So am I this is just clickbait😂😂
Happy fake birthday to fake lily have a very fake party
👍🇺🇸
@Christina3891there’s no way to “put down” a three year old who doesn’t exist.
God Bless King Charles III and Queen Camilla.
Troll
🍪
She is no princess and probably does not even exist
You need treatment
@@nobleknight1472for stating the truth? Hardly.
@Christina3891 Lilibet is a Princess, the official website of the Royal Family has been updated to reflect this.
No new photo?
What a joke.
You 🍼 baby hater.
I wasn't talking about the "baby" but thanks for letting us know where you stand nitwit.
Sorry, but unable to locate a birth certificate for a child born with this name, on this date at that hospital. More of Rachel’s lies.
There WAS no child born at that "boutique" Santa Barbara hospital. The college-aged surrogate gave birth at UCLA Medical Center to a female named Diana Mary, and upon discharge, the birth mother fled with the child to Colorado, where Harry had absolutely ZERO chance of enforcing a surrogacy agreement, since he has NO biological ties to the child!
I googled and found birth certificate in 2 seconds btw. Surprisingly.
@@joyr2273yeah, fake ones
What hospital? Cottage hospital in SB?
@@annhenry7948 Definitely not Cottage hospital, since my cousin knows a nurse who works in the NICU at that hospital, who said that Snarkle ABSOLUTELY DID NOT GIVE BIRTH THERE!
Now channel creator Paula M. allegedly found a birth record at UCLA Medical Center for a child born on or about "Markle's" due date, and given the birth name of "Diana Mary," alleged to be the child born to the SECOND SURROGATE.
That birth mother is alleged to have fled to Colorado, where Harry had LESS THAN ZERO RIGHTS, because he has ZERO BIOLOGICAL TIES to EITHER this "Are chee" or "Lill ee."
sorry unscubscribing.... How can you call yourself The Royal Family Channel and keep on putting false news. Bye Bye.
c ya!
It’s a fake “royal family” channel, run by itn
They're not royals, nor are their children. D.N.A. test.
I don't believe heirs to the throne should continue to be heirs whilst living in foreign countries.
Another nonsensical post about an imaginary child
She was not named after the queen because the Queen's name is not Lilibet. Princess Beatrice's child is named after Queen Elizabeth, so is Zara's and Peter's. And of course there's Princess Charlotte. In fact Zara's name is Zara Anne Elizabeth. Harry and Meghan made a joke out of the entire process.
Because they seem a joke 😢
Where is the current Photo????????????????????????????????
Rent a kid was closed at time of sitting…..
She’s not real!
Es princesa Lilibeth de susex de Reino unido nieta de el rey Carlos 😂😂😂
@@celissolarte Veo que el inglés no es lo tuyo…
Yo dije que “no es real”, o sea que no existe! (porque todo el mundo sabe que son muñecos/photoshop y/o niños prestados para las fotos).
No dije que no fuera una “royal”.
“Royal” ≠ “Real”
Megan hated Britian but gives her kids titles?
I know. You couldn't make it up, could you?
There is no baby.
Prove it.
@@erikacrews1338prove a birth certificate than ! According to British law there needs to be proof of birth to be in the line of succession to the throne !
@@txkitkat1307 yeah and the only people that need that proof is the royal family, which is why Harry and Meghan’s kids are on the royal family website. You can go check or I guess you can keep being delusional if you want.
Yes, well, you have to wonder why all their supposed close friends have never seen Lily it's very odd to say the least.
Can't they take an updated photo of her? That's very strange
Apparently not …
Rachel forever branded Lilabet.
The Queen was given the impression they were naming her Elizabeth. Rachel does everything for alternative motives
A claim is nothing without photographic evidence.
And that is why we want to see real pictures of kate. Not the ones that got killed.
Or ai generated video's
And dna
@@Ker-mk3bf The one that she said that she is sorry for that faux pas that she commited?
And the one that said that we will see her around easter?
😂🤣
Amen! 🤣
@@john_cockpit if you're so smart you'd remember "around easer" was scheduled before her cancer diagnosis.
Who cares the child is a Phantom, how can you wish someone you never see anything ..god help her from the insanity of her parents .
She will live a scathed life
Stealing the Queen's pet name for an invisible child is pretty despicable in my opinion
You think you’re the only person with the name Missy? Your mom recycled your name but Meghan Markle giving her kid a name that already exist is stealing? It’s givingracist.
Same old pics
why mention it if there are no photos? no party pics. nothing
Propaganda channel, fake “royal family channel”
PATHETIC.😂😂
invisibeth!😂😂😂😂
So who cares about mythical child? Why report on this?
I wonder how old Meghan’s two children will be untiil she dumps them like she has her family and friends.????
are you suffering from flashbacks.?
Already happened. Look at how many vacations they've taken without their children. Can you imagine Princess Diana doing that?
@@Cheesey.Louisey on
Show the birth certificate… nobody believes she carried these children….SHAMEFUL
O that's outrageous!!! As much as you/me/we/Brits dislike Harry and Megs, that child is biologically theirs! That's ridiculous!
Personal Data Protection!
@@Magdalenkaization and truth in our royals is very important….we are tired of being lied to
Then she shouldn’t be in the line of succession… there must be proof of birth!
@@txkitkat1307 👍
The child was named as a slam to Queen Elizabeth! That name was never supposed to be used again after Prince Phillip passed away! Totally disrespectful of both Meghan and Harry!
I agree 💯
Personally i woulda gone with Lily. Lilibet is more a nickname term of endearment then legal name.
Get off the slow bus because the author stated QEII was very delighted having a great granddaughter named Lilibet after her and that the UK media misconstrued what he stated in the book.
@shonnie8361 No she was delighted for them to name her great grandchild Elizabeth after her. Just like the other 30 grandkids and great grandkids. You should know this by common sense because her name is not Lilibet.
@Peghanxv : In the final analysis, why is this any concern of yours, or anyone else's?
Is there such a girl?
#wherearearchiandlilibet
#wherearearchiandlilibet
Where's Catherine? Where's Charlotte? Where's Louis?
@zoidmo3388 Why aren't you asking where George is? The answer to your question is during the day they are at school which started back up on Monday. Why are you stalking children?
😂
I just can't stand that Harry and Meghan have not released any pictures of Lilibet. We just have this one picture of her at about one year of age plus some baby photos. We do not know what she looks like at age 3! ☹
You have bigger things to worry about if you're so bothered about a child who isn't even yours. Why do you feel so entitled to photos of a 3 year old little girl, you're such a creep
Invisibet doesn’t exist!
An intemate family party ,what family ?,one grandmother no grandfather no grandmother no great uncles no great aunts no aunts ,uncles,cousins, second cousins god parents nursery friends neighbours my my what a gathering that must be.
they will come out when the money is needed
There is only one Lilibet and she is Queen Elizabeth lll ! Team Catherine, Princess of Wales 🏴 Prayers for Catherine and King Charles as they continue to recover from cancer.
My God! Are you trying to shade a Child? You're sick
O grow up!
So where are the photos? This child doesn’t exist. Why don’t you in the media investigate
FAKE!
❤ 👑 ❤ Why would you post this? No current pictures what is wrong with you?
I’m unsubscribing this channel if this channel continue posting Harry and his Family.
Why are you posting about a child that has not ever been seen by any of our beloved RF and very likely is not born of M body. First of all proof and DNI
There is no Lille
Raised them outside of the spotlight? 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
3 yr olds love intimate parties. What they don’t like is inviting all their friends from playgroup with their Mums, hiring a bouncy castle and a clown, then running round like tornados for 2 hours in a massive group sugar high!
No pictures, no party, probably no kid!!!!😂😂😂😂
No one cares.
I see the hate H&M Network cares...read the majority of these comments.
We don’t care. She’s not a working royal and doesn’t even know the royal family.
You think a 3 year old is a “working” anything?
Karens sure are dumb.
THIS PICTURE OF A SMALL CHILD IS NOT LILIBET….IT IS THE PHOTO OF A CHILD MODEL..THIS CHILD WAS POSING FOR PICTURES BEFORE LILIBET WAS BORN IF THERE EVEN IS A CHILD NAMED LILIBET…
Prove it.
@@erikacrews1338prove them wrong
@@krissypeters1517 Why would the Royal family acknowledge a kid that didn’t exist lol. Maybe ask yourself why you want to believe she’s fake.
@@erikacrews1338this isn’t the royal family’s channel. This is a fake “royal family” propaganda channel, run by itn. There is no acknowledgment from the royal family about this imaginary kid’s “third birthday.” How many times do you need to be told that? 😆🤡
Invisibet
Ridiculous!
Fakers
And then you wonder why they keep their kids hidden from you.
@@Ker-mk3bf Neither do Kate's children, to the deluded minds.
@@Ker-mk3bf Princess Lilibet and Prince Archie are also the direct lineage of King Charles. To ignore this fact, just because you are jealous of their mother is absurd. Those innocent kids did nothing to you.
@@VictoriousSageno one wonders why Harry and Meghan “keep their kids hidden.” They don’t have kids to keep hidden, their “kids” don’t exist.
The reason the imaginary children are never seen is because their “parents,” the two biggest camera hogging and fame hungry liars, grifters, and opportunists ever to exist, are concerned about their “privacy and security” and are “protecting” them from nonexistent threats? Are the sugars also of the belief that normal people are as gullible as they are?
Why is it you don’t hold H&M accountable for what they do and don’t do? What the point? No one believes a word that they say and no one believes what their mouth pieces say either. Someone needs to tell the truth.
MSM pushing fake narratives as usual
Are you seriously on a podium speaking for everyone? saying ' no one believes a word' 'no one believes what their mouth pieces say either" You are accountable for your delirium.
Why are you asking a fan channel this?
🥤
Really? So WHERE are the (current) pictures?!!
Why do they only show baby pictures?
The kid rental fees are too steep
Unsubscribing
So the same old pictures then? If William and Catherine did this, the sewer squad would be here having hissy fits.
They are doing this. We haven’t seen Charlotte or Luis since Christmas. Maybe stop focusing on seeing someone else kids you perv.
@@Ker-mk3bf You don't run this channel and nothing they said goes against TH-cam guidelines.
You just made baseless claim yourself. People have the right to their own opinions and that is allowed on TH-cam.
@@Ker-mk3bf
What did they say?
You haven't seen Charlotte or Louis and please spell his name correctly but other people have including their entire school so why are you being a perv?@@erikacrews1338
NO new picture at all. I almost forgot that MM was suppose to have kids, I still have my doubts that she carried them in her tummy. I agree that she is not named after the late queen at all, she does however have Lady Di name at least. I feel sorry for those kids. Would like to see DNA results as well.
This is not he child the first pic we saw was meg holding her and she had blonde hair. Wow
There's that picture again of legless Lil. Will we get to see any new, current images (photoshopped or not)?
like the market actor, the AI bench vid, the photoshop ultered mom day pic of missing Catherine. Where is Charlotte and Louis?
@zoidmo3388 Why aren't you asking where George is? The answer to your question is during the day they are at school which started back up on Monday. Why are you stalking children?
😂
Don't care about the kids till we see real proof that they are part of The Royal Family . 🇨🇦
Good thing they don’t care what you want. Maybe stop obsessing over someone else’s kids you perv.
@theres...Are you claiming you've seen the birth certificates of George, Charlotte, Louis or/& you've seen their DNA profile forms to prove their bloodline. But, I get it. You only have a hatefilled soul for H&M. You're an embarrassment to Canada.
Actually the birth certificates of George, Charlotte, and Louis are online. I believe that Archie's is also online, but it seems to keep changing every few months.@@zoidmo3388
🧠
Outside the spotlight? Weird, when you know that all Sparry and Megaliar want is being in the spotlight. No current or recent photos of either child suggests they do not exist… IMO
Harry and Meghan are not in the spotlight as much as you think. The British media can’t stop talking about them because they’re obsessed making it seem like they’re always doing something and they’re not.
@@Ker-mk3bf I can count on one hand how many times we’ve actually seen Megan this year. Meghan Markle can do whatever TF she wants. Cry about it.
@@erikacrews1338Nigeria was all about Meghan’s spotlight dressed inappropriately!
@@txkitkat1307 The First Lady of Nigeria made a statement that she never said anything about what Megan was wearing. Not you showing me that you believe the toxic media and didn’t actually do your own research before speaking on some thing you know nothing about.
@@erikacrews1338 the Brit media are paid NOT to print stories regarding 'Where's Kate/Catherine?' 'where's Charlotte and Louis' It's why they put fake sightings of them.
The media have to feed the gullible monarchist🐑 lies about H&M..bullying their children by untruths as if it's a right. Crazy hatefilled souls.
I’m sorry you have those 2 for parents
you must be sorry for George, Charlotte, Louis bec they have a mom being represented by an actor @ the market and an AI park bench vid and sinks lower by photoshopping ultered mother's day pic of them with the missing Catherine. So much hypocritical sheep here commenting.
Zoidmo When you get the subpoena that you're being sued for defamation of character and slander you will have proof of every single thing you wrote here correct? Because otherwise you're going to lose everything you've ever worked for.
I’d truly appreciate not seeing anything related to the California grifter’s here. I want to hear and see the real royals and what they’re doing. Don’t pander to them please!
You do know hos auntie did the same thing with her children right, Harry's cousins. are they grifters too.
Dolls that look like real children, technology is amazing! Does it laugh and cry and say things like "It's 200 bucks for a photo pal!". Lol.
An intimate party to celebrate the birthday of a child who is a ghost.
There must be a reason why the children are hidden.
I believe they simply don't exist.
Use borrowed photos to show ghosts.
Grow up!!
You'll be real happy simon, when Catherine's 👻shows up for Halloween. Must be a reason she's hidden & no live sightings. AI, actors, photoshopped old mom day pics are the only thing out there. Non existing? btw, Where's Charlotte and Louis? talk about ghosts.
@@Rickolsen247LOL wake up 😆🤡
Rachel and Henry are disgusting.
Do they not have current photos of these so called children?
Their parents obviously would. This fake royal channel not so much.
Why do you all keep posting these photos?
That is NOT Lili.
She is Stassie Schroeder's daughter.
Agree
🙄‼️
@@Ker-mk3bf FAKE ACCOUNT ‼️👎
@@Ker-mk3bf FAKE ACCOUNT ‼️👎
@@marymarr3 🙄‼️
Where's Merchie and Lilibucks???
A three years doesn't look like that fake kid. Who are they KIDDING. I guess they don't take pictures of the real ages. FAKE FAKE
I wonder why they copied the name from his niece Princess Charlotte: Charlotte ELIZABETH DIANA? 🤨
Where is Charlotte? Where is Louis? Where is Catherine?
@zoidmo3388 Why aren't you asking where George is? The answer to your question is during the day they are at school which started back up on Monday. Why are you stalking children?
The same names in both male and females within the royal bloodline have been passed down since 1500s
They don't grow. Don't know why this channel would show this.
Yes, I agree. It made me suspect the veracity of this whole channel.
Why did you watch? Obsessed much?!
It's a fan channel.
🍪
@@therealsophiemary Oh. Well that explains a lot. Thanks!!
Why are the Markles still using this two year old photo which is probably not even Lily? How many of us would even recognize this child if we saw her?
I didn’t even want to click on this but I had to see it to believe it. This is THE SAME RECYCLED PHOTO we have seen over and over!! Who are they kidding? I also can’t believe this wonderful channel is putting out this garbage.
This wonderful channel? This channel is awful. They don't even bother to check what they upload. It's only here to make money.
This isn’t a “wonderful channel.” It’s a fake “royal family channel,” run by itn. It’s mostly Harry and Meghan propaganda.
The _actual_ royal family channel is just called “The Royal Family.”
Who are you kidding?
There are no children!!!!
Prove it.
@@erikacrews1338 Is that all you ever say, change the record love, you're boring.
@@dazza9326 not you sitting obsessing over peoples kids you don’t even know. Pervert much?
@@erikacrews1338 You prove with DNA that there are!!
@@dazza9326 lolol Truth annoying you? She is a classic narcissistic sociopath and you are just another nieve follower!! That is a professional opinion!!!
This girl is not Lilibet, her name is Rebecca Cord media victim
Yeah, it’s either Rebecca Cord or Hartford Clark. Most definitely not “Lilibet”
Who's she!!!!! Heard her name a couple of times but never seen her. WHO CARES.
@dazzy...You obviously do care by commenting. I know what you mean though. We've been shown fake Kate/Catherine constantly for 6 MONTHS and she herself admitted she photoshopped/ultered her very own YRS PAST mom's day pic with her kids. That is a new level of low. Where is she anyway?
I thought Lilibet's hair was red. Looking at pic of MM holding them both. Apparently she has no idea how to hold a toddler.