Good work...I enjoy your videos very much. Some feedback, if I may: at least the frame of the front windscreen would generally still be present, if not both front and rear. Some faint markings on the aircraft would make it more visually interesting, as would some form of battle damage and any sort of underwater terrain features. Perhaps also, as a means of emphasizing the shallowness of the water, maybe having a propeller tip or the tip of the tail rise slightly above the water. Just some thoughts. Good work.
Brother, that’s what I said bout some Dioramas with LEDs and about this and guess what?! $1,000 in equipment and stuff later, at least 90 days, 2 to 3 to 4 hours a day, 4 to 5 days a week and…. I am only marginally closer than when I begun. All of this stuff is so much harder than it looks and by a wide, wide margin. Lolol anyways, finally starting to get somewhere this week - thanks to the airbrush and patience but good God…. these guys really do make it look easy.
@miamijules2149 Almost 400 hours of work and you're not finished? You must be yankin' his chain. $1000??? I think not. $250 and you're all set, and using nice tools. You are exaggerating brother.
Spectacular, once again an amazing specimen of model, Was this based on a photo, or film? Will you make an F/A-18 Super Hornet for the upcoming, Top Gun sequel? Take care, and all the best.
Great work. All I want to know is before and after the gel medium you spray something... what is that a gloss spray or is that some airbrushing? It's really nice when videos explain.. 😉 please and thank you
You took the effort to scratch build the control surfaces, but omitted the entire cockpit area. No windscreen, no canopy and no rear canopy. The three piece canopy is not ejected, the windscreen and rear canopy are fixed and middle part slides to the rear when opening. Of course the whole canopy structure could sheer off, but that’s not in line with the otherwise good condition of the wreck. Everybody pretends to be an expert, I am not, but it is just an inconstant part of the presentation.
Nope, this underwater diorama does not work at all. No props, even an eel under the wing would help and the wave ripples are unconvincing. Sea weed and a broken canopy would also help.
Nope, this comment doesn’t work at all. No kindness, even a hint of you having a tiny fraction of the skill and talent of this modeller would help and the zeek name is unconvincing. Deleting your comment and reflecting hard on your life choices would also help.
@@chad6080 I fail to see what "reflecting on hard choices" has to with my commentary on this video. The seabeds off Catalina and San Clemente islands are fairly representative of what might be found in a south Pacific setting of a downed Japanese Zero fighter. Seventy six years have passed since war's end and a plane in the water for that length of time would be festooned with growth. Even a barren seabed would attract creatures looking for food or a place to hide. The Channel Islands are a great place to use scuba gear or to snorkel. The plane at least should have been weathered with bullet holes and cracked canopy. San Clemente is closed to the public but pictures of old wrecks taken clandestinely off shore are sometimes released. Local octopi would eat Zeros for lunch.
@@zeekwolfe6251 are we really going to do this? You’re behaving like a self appointed art critic. You’re demanding that this artist produces work exactly to your specification and grading his work as if he’s some sort of school boy? Where is it claimed that this aircraft depicts a wreck in the modern day rather than how it looked in 1947? The aircraft could have ditched due to mechanical failure. It’s entirely up the artist what they choose to depict. Perhaps you’d like to share the link to your own scale modelling projects so that we can all assess your competence?
@@chad6080 Of course it is up to the artist to choose what they want to depict. One does not need vast university learning to understand works of art and the great skill needed to to show in one, two or three dimensions actual or mythological scenes. Some artists can excell in all phases, Salvador Dali and Pablo Picasso come to mind. Others, while talented and famous, can still produce work best relegated to less visited museums. Los Angeles has over 1000 museums, many housing fine art. The Huntington Library, the two Gettys (Center and Malibu), LACMA, the Eli Broad modern art museum and others are well attended. The Hammer UCLA art museum is a less visited museum because the founder, Armand Hammer, was a fence for art stolen by the Soviets after the 1918 revolution. Even the Rembrandts are substandard and other works are quite ordinary. I make no claim to being an art critic, but I know good composition when I see it. The submerged zero is a plastic model covered in aqua resin, a substandard work this time by perhaps an otherwise talented individual. Maybe a candidate for the Hammer Museum.
Dear Studio Blue Ocean and anyone reading i hope all is well. I just want to say that Jesus Christ loves and cares for you. If you haven't done so please accept Him as your savior and Lord. And remember to enjoy and cherish all that is good and right in life for we only get one life and we don't know what tomorrow will bring.
Although I myself are not at your level. But I find it a bit dull. Why no windscreen, skeleton, some partially gone markins, most of all water plants. Just a plastic plane in a lump of resin. Sorry but your submarine was way better.
Good work...I enjoy your videos very much. Some feedback, if I may: at least the frame of the front windscreen would generally still be present, if not both front and rear. Some faint markings on the aircraft would make it more visually interesting, as would some form of battle damage and any sort of underwater terrain features. Perhaps also, as a means of emphasizing the shallowness of the water, maybe having a propeller tip or the tip of the tail rise slightly above the water.
Just some thoughts. Good work.
Wow you have some amazing insights, the decal thing sounds nice.
An absolutely amazing piece of work here & very realistic indeed, I'd be proud if I'd have done this, so should you, nice job. 😉
How on earth do you manage to upload an entire project every week while still achieving incredible craftsmanship and detail?
I mean this is a project very doablre in a week, it's when he build a diorama with a fully detailed capital ship that is mind blowing
@@pietrooliani3251 I was referring generally to the content on this channel 😀
@@sirlevine538 yeah lol
wow! What an amazing piece of art!
Great work as always 👏👏👏👏👏👏
Looks amazing
Yes, another little gem! 👍👍
Actually the corners really looks great like that ... beautifull work.
Awesome work as always! I would love to see you try creating sea/ocean surface with waves and crests using epoxy resin?
Fantastic, could you list in the description what you use, would love to try something like this.
Brother, that’s what I said bout some Dioramas with LEDs and about this and guess what?! $1,000 in equipment and stuff later, at least 90 days, 2 to 3 to 4 hours a day, 4 to 5 days a week and…. I am only marginally closer than when I begun. All of this stuff is so much harder than it looks and by a wide, wide margin. Lolol anyways, finally starting to get somewhere this week - thanks to the airbrush and patience but good God…. these guys really do make it look easy.
@@miamijules2149 this is literally one of the easiest diorama's to make. Epoxy does most of the work anyways
@@miamijules2149 how goes your project now?
As always amazing..no words, and a very enjoyable proyect.
@miamijules2149 Almost 400 hours of work and you're not finished? You must be yankin' his chain. $1000??? I think not. $250 and you're all set, and using nice tools. You are exaggerating brother.
Oh wow I thought this channel has more subscribers, good work you've just earned a sub
Very nice
Looks very good! All the best for You! ;)
넘 멋지네요..^^ 말씀대로 에폭시 자체로는 물결표현이 어렵지만 표면에 물결표현 해주는것만으로도 멋지네요~
Good work
Making a similar diorama with the arizona, this helped a lot
Esta muy bueno el video y el resultado quedo muy bien .
Podrías hacer mas maquetas de barcos o aviones hundidos?
You are unstoppable at this. You do everything so good and some parts even better. Keep the hard work up.
Really wish you would state the products/paints etc you use. Great video anyway.
조형도 조명도 예술이네요.
이젠 에폭시까지 쓰시네...점점 더 고수가 되는것 같습니다
Nicee
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 Quality!
Superbe!!👌 😉 🏁...
Spectacular, once again an amazing specimen of model, Was this based on a photo, or film?
Will you make an F/A-18 Super Hornet for the upcoming, Top Gun sequel?
Take care, and all the best.
Очень красиво!
This brings me back to ww2 and one Country set to conquer the world
A surprise to be sure, but a welcome one
사용하신 스프레이는 뭔가요? 신기하게 투명해지네요.
The music was sad, unsettling tragic and perfect
Wow
Do more of this pls
Can you say what kind of resin you use?
진짜 거의 기계급..
I hear it’s near impossible without ‘perfect measurements’ and heat/temp/climate control.To get a Deep and Large Scale Epoxy to Work? Is this True?
White guard.(frame) What are these ingredients?
시바툴로 조형할때 꼭 경화제도 같이 넣어야하나요?
Great work. All I want to know is before and after the gel medium you spray something... what is that a gloss spray or is that some airbrushing? It's really nice when videos explain.. 😉 please and thank you
Spray is gloss top coat spray. thank you
What do you spray on the sides to make them turn transparent?
Gloss varnish
とてもきれいですね。ゼロ戦闘機ですか？
А если сделать дно из гипса?
Who else thought the music was going to play sadness and sorrow from naruto in the beginning 😂
本当に墜落した零戦みたいですごいですねぇ〜
2:56 혹시 이런 진흙 표현은 어떤 재료로 하시나요?
손에 힘 많이 들어가겠어요
You took the effort to scratch build the control surfaces, but omitted the entire cockpit area. No windscreen, no canopy and no rear canopy.
The three piece canopy is not ejected, the windscreen and rear canopy are fixed and middle part slides to the rear when opening. Of course the whole canopy structure could sheer off, but that’s not in line with the otherwise good condition of the wreck. Everybody pretends to be an expert, I am not, but it is just an inconstant part of the presentation.
I want to do that soo much but I’m not that talented
Please if you can link where you got the model? that would be nice
No thats a SubZero
I guess it died of covid.
It should have enough battle damage for the viewer to envision a whole scene leading to its watery grave.
Possibly ran out of fuel? Or, since the canopy is missing, a kill-shot to the pilot would do it too, without much damage.
,
As a Chinese, when I see the wreck of a Japanese zero. I feel so happy
Taiwan no.1
@@user-lu2kw9nc5x China no 1
@@hiofongcheng4208 Taiwan no.1
This got interesting....
Amen me too!
Nope, this underwater diorama does not work at all. No props, even an eel under the wing would help and the wave ripples are unconvincing. Sea weed and a broken canopy would also help.
Nope, this comment doesn’t work at all. No kindness, even a hint of you having a tiny fraction of the skill and talent of this modeller would help and the zeek name is unconvincing. Deleting your comment and reflecting hard on your life choices would also help.
@@chad6080 I fail to see what "reflecting on hard choices" has to with my commentary on this video. The seabeds off Catalina and San Clemente islands are fairly representative of what might be found in a south Pacific setting of a downed Japanese Zero fighter. Seventy six years have passed since war's end and a plane in the water for that length of time would be festooned with growth. Even a barren seabed would attract creatures looking for food or a place to hide. The Channel Islands are a great place to use scuba gear or to snorkel. The plane at least should have been weathered with bullet holes and cracked canopy. San Clemente is closed to the public but pictures of old wrecks taken clandestinely off shore are sometimes released. Local octopi would eat Zeros for lunch.
@@zeekwolfe6251 are we really going to do this? You’re behaving like a self appointed art critic. You’re demanding that this artist produces work exactly to your specification and grading his work as if he’s some sort of school boy? Where is it claimed that this aircraft depicts a wreck in the modern day rather than how it looked in 1947? The aircraft could have ditched due to mechanical failure. It’s entirely up the artist what they choose to depict. Perhaps you’d like to share the link to your own scale modelling projects so that we can all assess your competence?
@@chad6080 Of course it is up to the artist to choose what they want to depict. One does not need vast university learning to understand works of art and the great skill needed to to show in one, two or three dimensions actual or mythological scenes. Some artists can excell in all phases, Salvador Dali and Pablo Picasso come to mind. Others, while talented and famous, can still produce work best relegated to less visited museums. Los Angeles has over 1000 museums, many housing fine art. The Huntington Library, the two Gettys (Center and Malibu), LACMA, the Eli Broad modern art museum and others are well attended. The Hammer UCLA art museum is a less visited museum because the founder, Armand Hammer, was a fence for art stolen by the Soviets after the 1918 revolution. Even the Rembrandts are substandard and other works are quite ordinary. I make no claim to being an art critic, but I know good composition when I see it. The submerged zero is a plastic model covered in aqua resin, a substandard work this time by perhaps an otherwise talented individual. Maybe a candidate for the Hammer Museum.
Dear Studio Blue Ocean and anyone reading i hope all is well. I just want to say that Jesus Christ loves and cares for you. If you haven't done so please accept Him as your savior and Lord. And remember to enjoy and cherish all that is good and right in life for we only get one life and we don't know what tomorrow will bring.
Although I myself are not at your level. But I find it a bit dull. Why no windscreen, skeleton, some partially gone markins, most of all water plants.
Just a plastic plane in a lump of resin.
Sorry but your submarine was way better.