I’ve heard this theory before but it makes no sense. Why would the CIA want to overthrow a strong allied state and replace it with a foe? The Mullahs have done nothing but step on the US is toes every chance they get. The CIA aligned themselves with Saddam Hussein only a few years after the revolution in an attempt to bring down the Islamic republic. Why would they instal Khomenei, only to attempt to remove him via brute force a few years later?
the Middle East was in Peace? Is this a joke? The Middle East is in constant flux because of the fight between islamic extremism and moderation ... its never been at peace. But what is true - is that Iran is OCCUPIED by ARAB Muslims and the native Persians are oppressed and colonized.
the Irony it was Britain that shaped the modern borders of Iran, if Britain did not want a strong Iran why didn't they create multiple states in modern Iranian territory, then?, was it feasible?, IMO absolutely yes!
Carter with his smiling teeth stabbed the Shaw in the back and allowed Kohemani to return from France and kick out the Americans and embassy. The US use to have a large interest section in Iran and when I was in the Army Medical Service we had a hospital in Iran called Teheren Medical Hospital.
@@l.ls.8890 I heard about that not long ago. I believe someone made a reunion documentary about the some American military vets going back for the first time to meet medical workers ect they helped save during war.
Every country will be at peace as long as the US and Europe gets their hands on their wealth and bends over. PBD doesn't want to piss off people and his sponsors by telling the truth.
ولی شاه ایران چون امریکا و غرب را تحریم نفتی میکرد کنار گذاشته شد و بجای آن رژیم دست نشانده خودشان را بر سر کار آوردند مانند طالبان در افغانستان.کارتر شاه را کنار زد و بعدها وقتی از او پرسیدند که چرا به خمینی یه چک به مبلغ صدوپنجاه هزار دلار دادی و به او کمک کردی تا بر علیه شاه برخیزد گفت من فکر میکردم خمینی مانند گاندی یک رهبر صلح طلب است😢
That's not entirely true, many countries have fallen from within such as Venezuela, due to Communism. The US has tried to stay out of things, like after WWI, but then we got drawn in anyway. Not saying everything the US has done is okay, but we hand out TONS in foreign aid. No countries really seem to turn that down.
Iran was at peace when they had a democrately elected leader and was overthrown by the US. Every country in the middle east was destroyed and destabilized by the west. Idk why you sugarcoat that fact. You've lost all credibility brother
Sadly, I've come to realized since last October PDB is owned by the same entity that owns almost the entire US Congress. Only Thomas Massie has a backbone and integrity.
Well that Shah was a weak leader and frankly he had to go but it was a mistake for Iran to close down the US embassy , they should have kept it open . Iran was forced to pay around 50 million dollars to the embassy staff and the embassy is still closed , the US embassy staff won the lottery and Iran has been under sanctions ever since , the embassy should have never been closed down I hope the sanctions on Iran are removed and relations between Iran and the USA are improved , improved relations are a win/win , the embassy should reopen
@@SonnyRick you know nothing about the Shah. he was not weak at all. he was one of the oldest politicians in history. he had meetings with Churchill to Nixon! how can you call such a person weak? he left the country to stop a civil war. that is patriotism not weakness. iranians were brainwashed. he couldn't kill people only because he knew they were brainwashed.
@@audreyandlinCompany True dat! China was like “ lets build other countries infrastructure so we can get help and resources” while America went with double standards and military force lol
@@shafsteryellow Wrong. If you look at the declassified documents from the CIA, they met with the Shah and said that he would be overthrown by Mossadegh and requested that the Shah give in to the CIA. The Shah refused, saying that he can remove Mossadegh legally. According to the 1906 Constitution, the Shah had most powers given by the Constitution. In fact, it was Mossadegh staging the coup against the Shah when the Shah sent his letter of dismissal to Mossadegh. Look up "Did the CIA destroy democracy in Iran?" made by Persian History. It uses sources from the actual CIA website, and cites the 1906 Constitution. According to the 1906 Constitution, Iran was technically not a democracy. Democracy means rule of the people, was this the case in Iran? Absolutely not. Iran was a Constitutional Monarchy, and the Shah had most powers given by the Constitution, meaning that Iran couldn't have been considered a democracy in the first place.
About Mossadegh, I found a 40 minute documentary which I thought it would be interesting. It pulls sources from the actual CIA website, and their reports on Iran and the 1953 coup. If you don't want to watch it, that's okay. th-cam.com/video/4WAMTfWp0_E/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=PersianHistory I believe it was Iran's 1906 constitution that actually allowed the Shah to be more authoritarian. You see, leaders can't all the sudden become a dictator, because there can be laws that prohibit that sort of action. Like in the U.S. we have Checks and Balances, and Article 2 of the Constitution, which describes the President's role in leadership, what he can and can not do. In Iran's 1906 constitution, it's different, "As the constitutional monarch, the Shah’s powers were defined by the 1906 constitution. Some key aspects included: Executive Authority: The Shah held executive powers, including appointing the prime minister and other ministers. Legislative Role: While the Majlis (parliament) had legislative authority, the Shah could dissolve it and call for new elections. Judicial Influence: The Shah had some influence over the judiciary, including appointing judges. Military Command: The Shah was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. Foreign Affairs: The Shah represented Iran in foreign relations. Royal Prerogatives: The Shah could issue decrees and edicts." These laws actually paved way for the Shah to be more authoritarian. Again, I'd recommend watching the 40 minute documentary that I just posted. And, according to the New York Times, the Shah re-nationalized the oil fields in 1973. "TEHERAN, Iran, 1973 March 20 (AP)-The Shah of Iran today formally took control of the country's multibillion‐dollar oil industry from foreign operators. Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi announced nationalization of the industry in his broadcast Persian New Year message. He declared the take‐over gave Iran “full and real control” of all oil operations. The order places under control of the National Iranian Oil Company the largest oilfield, the largest refiner, the largest export terminal and the largest man‐made island in the world. The facilities had been operated by a consortium of British, American, French and Dutch concerns. The nationalization came after the group refused to double Iranian oil production to eight million barrels per day." *-New York Times.* As a matter of fact, during the Revolution, the Shah was actually *conceding to the people's demands for democracy.* He appointed Democratic Politican Shapour Bakhtiar as Prime Minister, which he ordered all political prisoners to be freed, lifted censorship of newspapers (whose staff had until then been on strike), relaxed martial law, ordered the dissolution of SAVAK (the regime's secret police) and requested for the opposition to give him three months to hold elections for a constituent assembly that would decide the fate of the monarchy and determine the future form of government for Iran. *Khomeini was the leader of the revolution,* and he refused to work with Bakthiar, and the regime was toppled a couple days later.
Apparently you got this whole thing about the Middle East wrong! The question should be who was behind the regime change in Iran!? If you know the answer to this question, then you are on the right track to figure out what happened since...
Well that Shah was a weak leader and frankly he had to go but it was a mistake for Iran to close down the US embassy , they should have kept it open . Iran was forced to pay around 50 million dollars to the embassy staff and the embassy is still closed , the US embassy staff won the lottery and Iran has been under sanctions ever since , the embassy should have never been closed down I hope the sanctions on Iran are removed and relations between Iran and the USA are improved , improved relations are a win/win , the embassy should reopen , it was wrong to close down the US embassy and it should reopen I think
@@SonnyRick the embassy was closed because the ayotallah is not a moron and knows embassies are used for staging coups like when the CIA overthrew the democratically elected president in 1953 . The embassy " hostages " were CIA. Hacks that stayed behind to get rid of the evidence linking the CIA to the coup in 1953
@@SonnyRick wrong, Shah did not want to kill unlike most middle Eastern leaders when the world started nasty propaganda against him with false number, and false news, and Carter push him to free terrorists from jail, leaders of communist , and Islamist terrorists , and when he gave a sudden politcal atmosphere when Iran was not ready...all by western pressure...when they started instigate protest, he did not suppress and he ordered army that no one nose is allowed to bleed
If a president or a king fires his minister, is it considered a coup? Did you believe the lies of the leftists?If the prime minister of Britain forcibly dissolves the parliament so that they cannot depose him, and brings tanks into the street to take power. Do you consider his dismissal a coup? Morally, Mossadegh was exactly like Khomeini.
Yep this regime now is not good, but the Shah was not a good guy. He threw a lavish party in 1971, that would have costed 650 million dollars while his people starved.
@@hellothere4765 Yeah, just like jan 6th was an insurrection and Biden is in good health and the prime of his life. You shouldnt believe everything the guys that are anti-the other guy, tell you.
@@hellothere4765 It is not true. First: We were not starving. Second, the cost was 16 million dollars. Third: next year, Iran's income from tourism increased by 220 million dollars due to the world's familiarity with Iran. Please do your research before believing anything
@@UncleTehrarist - Why? How does this harm YOU? Evidently it's all about YOU, so...why? Can't you control yourself? I'm curious wtf this is about. Who CARES what some girl wears?? It's just LEGS, man. Camels have legs too. Is this a problem as well?
Of course, you are likely a guy. It hits different when you are the one being targeted. Hey, I have an idea, let me ask you this: Let's say Allah wanted rules to switch for guys and girls. You'd be okay being hidden in this big black tent just to run errands, if you are ALLOWED to leave at all...? I mean, driving and reading is now illegal. Shut up and do as the women say, dog. You'd like being hidden like some invisible second class citizen, forced to look like one of those Hiroshima shadows because someone might have a temper tantrum and knock the shit out of you cuz some invisible entity said you could...? She and her buddies stoning guys in public because...oh pick a reason. Doesn't seem to need any. Oh right, Allah says they can. Women beheading men in the road because, oh I don't know, it's Tuesday? Women throwing acid in your face because she decided you insulted her in some way? Yeah, I'm sure you guys would love that. Edited to Add: I really want to know how much you'd enjoy the roles being reversed for what...? Centuries now? Having people like Uncle T up there, he's Auntie T now---Aunt Therarist getting angry because you dared showed your LEGS in public for a few years in the 1970s...? Uht Oh, Aunt T might spray her shorts, how dare YOU...! Seriously? You'd be all right with that?
The Middle East was in Peace when the Old Persian Empire ruled that region. There were a few rebellions here and there but it was mostly Peaceful. The Old Persian Empire respected the Jewish State of Israel. They helped them rebuild their Sacred Temple as well. They never desecrated or Damaged the Ancient Structures which were built by the Sumerians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, Egyptians etc.
It's complicated and delicate. Examples 1. The Persian Empire ruled the region, but their faith was Zoroastrian, not what it is today. 2. Alexander didn't "destroyed" anything. Persians had many conflicts, Chinese, Mongols, afghans, and sometimes lost, but they always came back. Again, today they seem to have lost for good, because they are not Zoroastrian anymore.
اسکندر یا لشکری از اروپا بله به غارت سرزمین پارس پرداختند ولی پارسیان بیشترین لطمه را از حمله اعراب و مغول به خود دید زیرا علاوه بر غارت اموال و کشتن مردان و به بردگی گرفتن زنان و کودکان اسناد خطی زیادی یا در آتش سوخت یا به آب انداخته شد و از بین رفت که اگر بود خیلی زودتر از این ها به علم طب ابن سینا یا علم نجوم و ریاضی رازی یا ابوریحان بیرونی و خوازمشاهی دست میافتیم و این نمونه افراد را زودتر از اینها در تاریخ مشاهده می کردیم@@hjc7429
Shah of Iran wasn't an anti Zionist, he totally appreciated the concept of Zionism, he also clearly called Palestinian activists bully and terrorist. He was frustrated for getting picked on by left wing radicals. He was a friend of Israel.
Is there a reason why PBD keeps absolving the US from the mess in the middle east? And no ... Israel has always been the reason for instability in the middle east even during the Shah's time.
There was no peace in the Middle East under the Shah, this is complete nonsense. Yes, the violence has increased under the lsIamic republic, but it didn’t start with the revolution. The Arab-lsraeIi conflicts would take off every few years while the Shah was in powered. The Arab Socialists and the Pan-lsIamists have been at each others necks since Nassers Egyptian revolution. The Kurds had been rebelling against Iran, Syria, Iraq and Turkey since the French and the British divided up the region. This segment is complete nonsense.
PBD please have this guy on His name is Nader Saiedi He was my professor at ucla He has a lot of information about what happend and what needs to be done It will be a great show!
Israel never claimed to bring peace to the Middle East. Jimmy Carter was indeed horrible. But Israel has been attacked consistently even with Pahlavis. Israel didn’t topple Shah the west did. Islam itself deserves some credit for such undermining of Shah.
Israel is an illegal occupying white European colony. The shah was a puppet of the west. If he had any moral fabric, he would of never allowed for the Europeans to steal the land of the Persian Empire.
@@1Hash0 Wrong. Carter wanted him gone and they funded protests to overthrow him. Iran has always been a country people want to take out in the West. Iran is too smart.
I’m out in the Middle East was at peace before the west came and put Israel. I don’t understand why y’all keep thinking the Middle East was always violence in the stabilized. It was always peaceful until France England and America came your president always say America has to protect his interest and interest of the private sector is to keep the Middle East and conflicts. Middle Eastern are not violence. Your private sector is.
PBD you always say, "future looks bright" but how? What can we do to change the past? to keep the world in peace, not just our region in the Middle East. Yes, there were countries in the past that took advantage of other countries and used their resources technically for free! But now everyone's awake. We need a non-biased person that brings peace to all nations and countries and unfortunately, in this world, that person does not exist, and believe it or not, history repeats itself
What the heck are you talking about? The Middle East has been continuously full of war and violence since WW1. Iran itself was invaded in WW2 by the British and the Soviets. Then the elected prime minister of Iran was overthrown in 1953 by the British and the Americans. There were 5 Arab-Israeli wars between 1948 and 1973. Along with numerous terrorism and counter-terrorism attacks. And there was a huge and bloody civil war in Lebanon that started in the mid-1970s. All of this happened while the Shah was there. He didn’t stop jack. And while the Shah did economically modernize Iran using the oil money, he was also a dictator whose Savak secret police imprisoned and tortured tens of thousands of Iranians. Did you ever read “The Crowned Monkeys”?
One of my professors in college was Armenian that grew up in Iran. He told us how it had nightclubs😢, jeans, etc and 1 day they woke up and it changed instantly
Excellent video as always but here is my problem I have been making losses trying to make profit trading. I thought trading demo account is just like trading the real market... can anyone help me out or at least advise me on what to do
@HarperAsher-q3iYou're right! I have lost a lot trading all by myself without a guide. It's been an uneasy ride for me. Who is your mentor please. how can i reach her i really need help in this bear market now?
So how can PBD hate these guys if he sees the cause of the mayhem always comes from one entity? Does he think submission will liberate the people of Iran? Should they give up their sovereignty like the Europeans ?
Both you and Wayne are right but those were short-term conflicts, not long-tern all out wars like the recent one which has been going on since October 23.
PBD, I like you but actually during Shah’s time the Middle East was going through continuous turmoil including various Arab-Israeli wars, war in Algeria, civil war and Israeli occupation in Lebanon, Yemeni wars, and others.
yeah he has no clue what he's on about. No one would be going to Iran to go skiing over a beautiful country in Europe. To say the Middle East has ever been in peace under one particular person is totally ridiculous.
Please clarify, do you mean pre-cia-coup shah, or, post cia coup shah, idk presenter completely forgets about cia coup just like Waheed Ali on The Panel on Channel 10 (au)
Yes but Shah’s efforts at lobbying between Saadat and Robin is what led to camp David. But after revolution Carter took the credit and even won the noble peace prize for it.
@@Hermesborugerdian Idk if you can give the full credit to one person or the other. If it wasn’t for Egypt economics crisis and their need for US aid the deal may have never happened.
Actually I was thinking about his face too a bit. I was thinking, either way, his face is perpetually in a guilty looking state. Is this because he is a very smart guy who has worked out that if you spout swamp propaganda like this the al gore rhythms will love you and get you in the millions, or, does he meet with cia guy in lonely alley and get that briefcase to pay for that luxurious lifestyle? Either way, it does not matter anymore. You have to give props to cia for bossing youtube, much better propaganda tool than pathetic Russian RT hehehe
So are you saying they will not allow you in today? The problem is not Iran or Iranians the problem is the West doesn't want to see Iran progress because of its history, they know these people are smart and if allowed they will compete with everyone, especially on weapons building which the US number 2 export after the Dollar, Trump when he took the presidency focused on competition, China, Iran and Russia, Tariffs on China sanctions on Iran and he tried to end the gas supply to Europe from Russia, Was Aqaeda and ISIS created by Iran or has anything to do with Iran? fact Iran is fighting ISIS and Al Qaeda, have you heard any Shia blow up himself for his religion?
The United States and Britain installed the colony called Israel to start conflict and terrorism in the middle east. Since Israel was installed in 1948 the middle east has not seen peace. Also It's totally disheartening that Islamic Iranians are erasing 6000 years of Persian civilization, history and rich culture. Alongside western colonization we also have Islamization going on around the world unquestioned.
I know to come here if I need to hear the truth of events. Just a normal mum from Australia, totally flabbergasted of what is happening in the world. Love to you all
Sorry Pat, but I think you forgot about the 1957, 1967 and 1973 wars while Iran was ruled by the Shah. Peace in the Middle East has always been tentative at best.
Here in Ohio a women i talked to 30 plus years ago said her and husband and some friends of hers would go to Iran , Iraq ,Isreal for vacation doing the 1950's and 1960's and early 1970's and said it was wonderfull back then!
This regime now is not good, but the Shah was not a good guy. He threw a lavish party in 1971, that would have costed 650 million dollars while his people starved. He had gained this power through a CIA backed regime change in 1953.
This lavish party that you speak of was frankly recommended by the UN, it was recommended so the rest of the world could have a better understanding of Iran’s history and culture.
Saddam Hussein, and Kadafi also played a major role in stability in the Middle East. Once they were removed, terrorists took over. We all have to be honest about this, im not a fan of Saddam Hussein, but he kept Iraq in order and there was stability. PBD should also acknowledge this, despite it being an unpopular thing to say.
This is why I love this podcast, no podcast offers me more forbidden knowledge. This is what the EU is making laws against as we speak. In ten years there will be European federal prison time for spreading anti narrative knowledge. We are running into a bleak future and fast, enjoy this and learn as much as you can👍
I'm iranian myself. The idea that U.S actively supported the revolutionaries to overthrow the Shah is not supported by historical evidence. I don't know about his other videos but in this one most of what he says is a conspiracy theory rather than an accepted hypothesis based on evidence. The consensus among historical experts is that the U.S was a strong supporter of the Shah. Iran was provided military and economic aid as a part of the broader cold war strategy. Declassified documents show the U.S was trying to preserve the Shah's regime and was caught off guard by the speed and success of the revolution.
@@SinaHeidari522 Look up Robert E. Huyser "While the option of a pro-Shah military coup still was a possibility, Huyser met with Iranian Armed Forces leaders (but not the Shah), and established meetings between them and Khomeini allies, for the purpose of agreeing on Shapour Bakhtiar's transitional government." - Mission to Tehran by Andre Deutsch "According to a newly released report by the US government, Huyser's main objective was to declare the US government's support for the military to prevent any possible coup of the army's frightened generals. Huyser also met with some opposition leaders like Mehdi Bazargan." - BBC
Israel Is a very important ally of the west in the middle east ... Always has been , but Patrick you are correct about Iran bring a important ally of the west until the 1979 revolution ...
Dear PBD, I am a Jew from Israel, hears and respects your words, Allow me to add and perhaps correct a little My grandfather, peace be upon him, from Mashhad Iran. He was an orphan, his parents suffered riots and had to live as Muslims on the outside. Pahlavi was perfectly fine with the Jews, but he lived a life of luxury, when his people were hungry...that's what brought him down. Regarding the Middle East.. there was a madman named Jamel Nasser who closed Suez in 1956 and the whole Middle East went up in flames.. so unfortunately there are too many dictators in the Middle East.. and even the Shah could not always control them.
Almost every country that lost its way had a turning point, I'm Nigerian and there's always talk of the glory days even during and immediately after colonialism but fact is bad leaders wreck countries and the Shah obviously wasn't a good leader. You only praise the Shah because of the alternative, but bad leaders tend to breed worse leaders and usually downhill from there.
The Shah was near perfect for Iran, he raised a poor underdeveloped country into a relatively prosperous. What happened in 1979 was an un-holly alliance between the left, the Islamists and the 7 powerful oil companies who can be compared to the tech giants of today in terms of power and wealth. Of course our people helped by allowing themselves to be coned and manipulated, but they regret it bitterly The oil contract was coming up and the Shah wanted better terms and to take complete control of oil production and distribution. Surely Nigerians have also experienced the detrimental effects of the the games played by world powers
Right away after the damned 'Khomaini' returned from France (where he got an overthrow full course..), he played a very same game to start an Iranian revolution exactly similar to the French revolution which was led by the freemasonry.
Pat, your blood and DNA is still Iranian, it's a shame whatever the Iranian population has been put through, an Iranian will always be an Iranian, be proud!
The U.S. has not caused all the conflicts and destabilization in the middle east . The vast amount of conflict is caused by the people of the M. East by way of their cultures especially tribalism and Islamic ideology ...
He’s referring to the Abraham Accords. What he, and many others, fail to understand is that none of the countries in the Abraham Accords were enemies. They had been secretly allied for a half a century.
Your whole argument here is completely fallacious. Did you forget about the six day war? The Middle East was not at peace during the shahs but on the contrary, had conflicts going on all over the place.
What lesson? He’s completely delusional when it comes to the shah. The Middle East wasn’t at peace when the shah was in power, it was more violent than it is today. You have the lsraeIi-Arab wars, the Kurdish wars against Iraq, Syria, Turkey and Iran and you had the secular pan-Arab nationalist vs the pan-Islamic monarchs. There’s less conflict in the Middle East today than there was back when the shah was in power.
Shah gave too many interviews to western journalists and they held it against him. He should not have done that, they didn’t deserved it. None of the monarchs give that many interviews.
Nah brody you need a history lesson. Read the book the prize its a 800 page book on the history of oil. At one point iran was the strongest force in the middle east. Might have not been a long time but there was a snapshot in time when it was on top
You are right about the first part. However in terms of the second part, thats not quite accurate. Iran back then was kind of like Saudi right now. A stabilising factor on the region. Keep in mind that even now with its current regime, Iran has a strong presence in the region. If they werent so destabilising on the region, they might have still been the main ''guy in charge'' instead of Saudi.
@@Tiasung who said Saudis are in charge rn? They can't even pull their pants on without US permission. Iran already built its shia empire in the middle East. And if you take a look at history, iranians and turks are always in charge of the middle east not Arabs.
Some fact fo us citizen: First, mosadegh was not democratically elected. Second, the Shah was in power before Mosadegh. After the terror of Razmara by a radical group, the Shah selected Mosadegh to bring some peace to the people and help with oil nationalization. However, Mosadegh was just talk; and failed in all aspects of the economy, oil nationalization, politics, etc. The Shah had a prime ministers before Mosadegh, and according to Iranian law, the Shah had the power to remove Mosadegh, aftet Mosadegh Closed parliament , Shah send him dismissed from power order he first accepted then refused , army involved cause mosadegh start some riots .... so it was not a coup. A lot of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation is against shah. You know why right?
Actually it all started in 1948. Something happened that unleashed conflict in mid east. Also Shah of Iran forced women to take off their headscarf. You call that freedom? he was just another extreme opposite of the current regime.
Your link for the invite to the a.i. webinar does not work! Tried 3 times over the past week. It says your registered but sends or gives no link. .Kind of ironic for tech. themed webinar and not a good look for you. Im give up
اگر شاه ایران نبود امروز کشور عمان هم مانند یمن بود.روزی که سلطان قابوس پادشاه عمان از شاه ایران برای گروهک های کمونیستی که توسط روس ها شورانده شده بودند درخاست کمک کرد این ارتش ایران بود که ظرف دو ذوز شورش کمونیست های عمان را سرجایشان نشاند و حتی سالها بعد سلطان عمان امنیت کشورش را مدیون شاه و ارتش ایران میداند. ارتش ایران در جنگ حمله اعراب علیه اسرائیل هم به درخاست سازمان ملل برای ساختن امنیت منطقه حضور داشتند که با انقلاب اسلامی در ایران خمینی نیروهای ایران را از آن منطقه به ایران آورد چون خمینی مخالف صلح و آرامش در منطقه بود و بلافاصله جنگ با عراق را شروع کرد و بعدها گفت ما به جنگ احتیاج داشتیم و جنگ برای ما یک نعمت بود!. چون به بهانه جنگ خزانه را خالی کرد و تمام نیروهای متخصص و نیروی هوایی ایران را اعدام کرد و یا از کشور فراری داد و ارتش ایران را منحل کرد و از بین برد دقیقا اهدافی که انگلیس و روس ها در مورد ایران دوست نداشتند.مانند افغانستان که با ورود طالبان ارتش منحل شد و افراد متخصص یا کشته شدند یا از ترس طالبان از کشور فرار کردند و کشور خالی از ارتش و افراد متخصص شد که سالها آموزش دیده بودند
Iranian imperial army directly got involved in Oman and suppressed a communist coup. The immortal guards who were deployed there essentially preserved the Sultanates.
So how can you on one hand say Israel is right and America first when your entire heritage was torn apart by their influence? Into an island of instability
@@horusksa1983 beruit is in Lebanon. And where the Lebanese malitia took over and caused a war from within and started a huge problem with Israel, Israel didn't want war. Lebanon was the problem. The Lebanese malitia when they had problems from within and Carter stuck his grizzly sticky hands in big oil it got worse. Carter should have left it alone
I love your show, but here you wrong, because you don’t know the history or maybe for other reasons. Middle East was in war from 1948 then 1956, 1967, then 1973. If this is peace, I don’t know what is war.
From the early 1960's until the Revolution in Iran, thousands of Americans resided in Iran. At first it was mostly for the petroleum industry and some military advisors but later on when Iran began to purchase a lot of military hardware, most of it from the US, technical advisors, engineers and technicians from Boeing, Bell Helicopter, McDonnell- Douglas, Grumman, General Electric, Pratt and Whitney, Hughes Aircraft, etc began pouring in. The Imperial Iranian Air Force was the only military other than the US Navy which flew the F14 Tomcat. My father worked for Sherkate Sahami Jeep in Iran from 1967 until 1973. Many Iranians that worked with my father advised him to leave and take his family with him as they knew things were going to get ugly. 60 Minutes did a story on Americans living in Iran titled "Yanks in Iran".
I was detached to the USS Kitty Hawk in 1974 when we picked up the Shaw and took him to sea and performed an air show for him to prove our capabilities in protecting Iran. I couldn’t believe how fast everything went to hell after the 1979 revolution but it was all predicted in The Late Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsay in 1972
I say this as an Iranian from inside Iran. The world will not see peace until Reza Shah II returns to Iran. The arms of the Islamic Republic reached Europe and America .You will experience disasters that you cannot even imagine. Like our previous generations who had no idea of the miseries after 1979
This is total nonsense. There was still no peace in the Middle East when the shah was in power. The Arab-lsraeIi wars took place under the Shah. Every few years there would be an all out conflict between lsraeI and their neighbors. The Pan-Arab socialist and the pan-Islamist monarchies were regularly engaging in proxy wars all over the region. The Kurds had conflicts with Iraq, Syria, the shahs Iran and Turkey. This whole segment is complete rubbish. PBD has such a hard-on for the shah, he becomes totally delusional when he’s brought up.
It was the CIA who took the Ayatollah from Paris and installed him in Iran
I’ve heard this theory before but it makes no sense. Why would the CIA want to overthrow a strong allied state and replace it with a foe? The Mullahs have done nothing but step on the US is toes every chance they get. The CIA aligned themselves with Saddam Hussein only a few years after the revolution in an attempt to bring down the Islamic republic. Why would they instal Khomenei, only to attempt to remove him via brute force a few years later?
With French blessing 😅😅😅
Controlled by the mossad
Has the CIA ever done ANYTHING beneficial for the world or the US?
@@dr-rexmangrca113 I THINK MAYBE CIA IS INSTAL PRESENTER IN TH-cam;)
Iranian people are not our enemy
' Israel is American Most Dangerous Enemy . '
us is the enemy of the world
Israel is our Enemy
Governments fight governments and use their own youth as fodder. Who is our enemy? When is war justified?
No people's are the enemy
Yea, Middle East was at peace when Iran (under Shah) was in charge. But the problem was U.S and England couldn't sale their weapons.
Jimmy Carter.
Yeap
PBD forgot about the Soviets charging into Afghanistan in '79
The problem was the influence of Russia and the problem still Russia!
@@BlackWolF_1374 the problem is the west especially the USA and UK
The british and the US did not want a strong iran. In addition, iraq was prompted to fight iran with the us backing
Yeah, that's why they told the soviet union to send Iraniam communist
@master1941 To send Iranian communists where? Are you talking about the one's the US government brought to the US after WWII?
Israel did not want a strong Iran. Israel wants the middle east all to itself. Europeans love to steal land.
the Middle East was in Peace? Is this a joke? The Middle East is in constant flux because of the fight between islamic extremism and moderation ... its never been at peace. But what is true - is that Iran is OCCUPIED by ARAB Muslims and the native Persians are oppressed and colonized.
the Irony it was Britain that shaped the modern borders of Iran, if Britain did not want a strong Iran why didn't they create multiple states in modern Iranian territory, then?, was it feasible?, IMO absolutely yes!
Carter with his smiling teeth stabbed the Shaw in the back and allowed Kohemani to return from France and kick out the Americans and embassy. The US use to have a large interest section in Iran and when I was in the Army Medical Service we had a hospital in Iran called Teheren Medical Hospital.
@@l.ls.8890 I heard about that not long ago. I believe someone made a reunion documentary about the some American military vets going back for the first time to meet medical workers ect they helped save during war.
Every country will be at peace as long as the US and Europe gets their hands on their wealth and bends over. PBD doesn't want to piss off people and his sponsors by telling the truth.
ولی شاه ایران چون امریکا و غرب را تحریم نفتی میکرد کنار گذاشته شد و بجای آن رژیم دست نشانده خودشان را بر سر کار آوردند مانند طالبان در افغانستان.کارتر شاه را کنار زد و بعدها وقتی از او پرسیدند که چرا به خمینی یه چک به مبلغ صدوپنجاه هزار دلار دادی و به او کمک کردی تا بر علیه شاه برخیزد گفت من فکر میکردم خمینی مانند گاندی یک رهبر صلح طلب است😢
That's not entirely true, many countries have fallen from within such as Venezuela, due to Communism. The US has tried to stay out of things, like after WWI, but then we got drawn in anyway. Not saying everything the US has done is okay, but we hand out TONS in foreign aid. No countries really seem to turn that down.
@@noelvoss6744foreign aid=WMD
he is just another one owned by zionists: you can tell by the questions he asks that he knows exactly what is going on
100% I agree. He doesn't wana piss off his sponsors
who has Iran started a war with or attacked? American foreign police has never cared about human rights.
You clearly have a selective memory of history
Yep the only reason American foreign policy is hawkish towards them is because of Israel.
@@thelonewrangler1008ok list the wars then. I hope this list is longer than what we see coming from western nations
@thelonewrangler1008 please list the wars, as previously requested 🤷♀️
@@thelonewrangler1008forever wars Master USA being fucjingover every one for years in name of freedom 😅😅😅
Iran was at peace when they had a democrately elected leader and was overthrown by the US. Every country in the middle east was destroyed and destabilized by the west. Idk why you sugarcoat that fact. You've lost all credibility brother
Sadly, I've come to realized since last October PDB is owned by the same entity that owns almost the entire US Congress. Only Thomas Massie has a backbone and integrity.
If you watched the whole video, he basically said it was the US government's fault
@@JAF0012 I'll give it a spin. I haven't been able to force my self to watch much anymore. We shouldn't throw the baby out with the bath water.
Because now he is an American millionaire
Now he is funded by Zionist to serve their interests
Iran was wonderful and it’s still wonderful but you need to ask yourself how the shah was taken out
Well that Shah was a weak leader and frankly he had to go but it was a mistake for Iran to close down the US embassy , they should have kept it open .
Iran was forced to pay around 50 million dollars to the embassy staff and the embassy is still closed , the US embassy staff won the lottery and Iran has been under sanctions ever since , the embassy should have never been closed down
I hope the sanctions on Iran are removed and relations between Iran and the USA are improved , improved relations are a win/win , the embassy should reopen
@@SonnyRick you know nothing about the Shah. he was not weak at all. he was one of the oldest politicians in history. he had meetings with Churchill to Nixon! how can you call such a person weak? he left the country to stop a civil war. that is patriotism not weakness. iranians were brainwashed. he couldn't kill people only because he knew they were brainwashed.
Unless you’re a young girl that refuses to wear a hijab.
@@weejoe27 look it up. It is not enforced anymore.
Was not is
Are you seriously saying that the US destabilized a well running country? Don't tell Africa, South America, or any indigenous person on earth.
Educate yourself before openning your mouth ... yes ... carter and CIA ..overthrew shah in my country iran ....
China says "Hold my rice bowl."
@audreyandlinCompany China is helping countries around the world. I know many is the west cannot understand helping others, but many do.
Too late America went there already lol
@@audreyandlinCompany True dat! China was like “ lets build other countries infrastructure so we can get help and resources” while America went with double standards and military force lol
Seems President Carter was worse than I realized.
i always heard he should have stayed a peanut farmer for reasons
That's how it is with every president after they leave
Trump said it
I spoke with an Iranian-American woman recently, she told me it was all President Carter’s fault for the mess it is today.
@spark556 maybe he did but i didnt hear it from him in 1978 when i was 4
The CIA overthrew the SHah of Iran.
No they overthrew mossadegh
@@shafsteryellow Wrong. If you look at the declassified documents from the CIA, they met with the Shah and said that he would be overthrown by Mossadegh and requested that the Shah give in to the CIA. The Shah refused, saying that he can remove Mossadegh legally. According to the 1906 Constitution, the Shah had most powers given by the Constitution. In fact, it was Mossadegh staging the coup against the Shah when the Shah sent his letter of dismissal to Mossadegh.
Look up "Did the CIA destroy democracy in Iran?" made by Persian History. It uses sources from the actual CIA website, and cites the 1906 Constitution.
According to the 1906 Constitution, Iran was technically not a democracy. Democracy means rule of the people, was this the case in Iran? Absolutely not. Iran was a Constitutional Monarchy, and the Shah had most powers given by the Constitution, meaning that Iran couldn't have been considered a democracy in the first place.
🤣😂 - we come in peace to spread "Democracy"
4 Blackrock and vanguard
The Shah of Iran had an internal coup like what is taking place with kameltoe hairyas-.😂
When is enough.... ENOUGH ?
About Mossadegh, I found a 40 minute documentary which I thought it would be interesting. It pulls sources from the actual CIA website, and their reports on Iran and the 1953 coup. If you don't want to watch it, that's okay. th-cam.com/video/4WAMTfWp0_E/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=PersianHistory
I believe it was Iran's 1906 constitution that actually allowed the Shah to be more authoritarian. You see, leaders can't all the sudden become a dictator, because there can be laws that prohibit that sort of action. Like in the U.S. we have Checks and Balances, and Article 2 of the Constitution, which describes the President's role in leadership, what he can and can not do.
In Iran's 1906 constitution, it's different,
"As the constitutional monarch, the Shah’s powers were defined by the 1906 constitution. Some key aspects included:
Executive Authority: The Shah held executive powers, including appointing the prime minister and other ministers.
Legislative Role: While the Majlis (parliament) had legislative authority, the Shah could dissolve it and call for new elections.
Judicial Influence: The Shah had some influence over the judiciary, including appointing judges.
Military Command: The Shah was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
Foreign Affairs: The Shah represented Iran in foreign relations.
Royal Prerogatives: The Shah could issue decrees and edicts."
These laws actually paved way for the Shah to be more authoritarian. Again, I'd recommend watching the 40 minute documentary that I just posted.
And, according to the New York Times, the Shah re-nationalized the oil fields in 1973.
"TEHERAN, Iran, 1973 March 20 (AP)-The Shah of Iran today formally took control of the country's multibillion‐dollar oil industry from foreign operators.
Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi announced nationalization of the industry in his broadcast Persian New Year message. He declared the take‐over gave Iran “full and real control” of all oil operations.
The order places under control of the National Iranian Oil Company the largest oilfield, the largest refiner, the largest export terminal and the largest man‐made island in the world. The facilities had been operated by a consortium of British, American, French and Dutch concerns. The nationalization came after the group refused to double Iranian oil production to eight million barrels per day." *-New York Times.*
As a matter of fact, during the Revolution, the Shah was actually *conceding to the people's demands for democracy.* He appointed Democratic Politican Shapour Bakhtiar as Prime Minister, which he ordered all political prisoners to be freed, lifted censorship of newspapers (whose staff had until then been on strike), relaxed martial law, ordered the dissolution of SAVAK (the regime's secret police) and requested for the opposition to give him three months to hold elections for a constituent assembly that would decide the fate of the monarchy and determine the future form of government for Iran.
*Khomeini was the leader of the revolution,* and he refused to work with Bakthiar, and the regime was toppled a couple days later.
Cater administration also destabilized Rhodesia-Zimbabwe.
Apparently you got this whole thing about the Middle East wrong! The question should be who was behind the regime change in Iran!? If you know the answer to this question, then you are on the right track to figure out what happened since...
Well that Shah was a weak leader and frankly he had to go but it was a mistake for Iran to close down the US embassy , they should have kept it open .
Iran was forced to pay around 50 million dollars to the embassy staff and the embassy is still closed , the US embassy staff won the lottery and Iran has been under sanctions ever since , the embassy should have never been closed down
I hope the sanctions on Iran are removed and relations between Iran and the USA are improved , improved relations are a win/win , the embassy should reopen , it was wrong to close down the US embassy and it should reopen I think
@@SonnyRick the embassy was closed because the ayotallah is not a moron and knows embassies are used for staging coups like when the CIA overthrew the democratically elected president in 1953 . The embassy " hostages " were CIA. Hacks that stayed behind to get rid of the evidence linking the CIA to the coup in 1953
@@SonnyRick That doesn't make sense. Calling the Shah a "weak" leader even though he had most powers given by the 1906 Constitution.
@@SonnyRick wrong, Shah did not want to kill unlike most middle Eastern leaders when the world started nasty propaganda against him with false number, and false news, and Carter push him to free terrorists from jail, leaders of communist , and Islamist terrorists , and when he gave a sudden politcal atmosphere when Iran was not ready...all by western pressure...when they started instigate protest, he did not suppress and he ordered army that no one nose is allowed to bleed
We would never hear these kinds of debates about Iran on 90% of podcasts or media outlets .. keep keeping us informed PBD 👊🏽
Mosaddegh was the democratically elected leader.
The Shah was installed by US/UK in 1953.
If a president or a king fires his minister, is it considered a coup? Did you believe the lies of the leftists?If the prime minister of Britain forcibly dissolves the parliament so that they cannot depose him, and brings tanks into the street to take power. Do you consider his dismissal a coup? Morally, Mossadegh was exactly like Khomeini.
Spot on 👏
Yep this regime now is not good, but the Shah was not a good guy. He threw a lavish party in 1971, that would have costed 650 million dollars while his people starved.
@@hellothere4765 Yeah, just like jan 6th was an insurrection and Biden is in good health and the prime of his life.
You shouldnt believe everything the guys that are anti-the other guy, tell you.
@@hellothere4765 It is not true. First: We were not starving. Second, the cost was 16 million dollars. Third: next year, Iran's income from tourism increased by 220 million dollars due to the world's familiarity with Iran. Please do your research before believing anything
Well done, covering this topics and education all had been over due. Thanks.
The civilian clothes during the time of the shah are shocking. Looks like America! Sad what happened.
You think clothing changes anything ? I can name you at least 10 countries that dress like Americans and are a shit show. Iran is doing very well.
@@latestmovies2016 -- Not since 1979 ...
@@latestmovies2016 yes but no mo mini skirts - i like my iran with mo mini skirts
@@UncleTehrarist - Why? How does this harm YOU? Evidently it's all about YOU, so...why? Can't you control yourself? I'm curious wtf this is about. Who CARES what some girl wears?? It's just LEGS, man. Camels have legs too. Is this a problem as well?
Of course, you are likely a guy. It hits different when you are the one being targeted.
Hey, I have an idea, let me ask you this:
Let's say Allah wanted rules to switch for guys and girls.
You'd be okay being hidden in this big black tent just to run errands, if you are ALLOWED to leave at all...? I mean, driving and reading is now illegal. Shut up and do as the women say, dog.
You'd like being hidden like some invisible second class citizen, forced to look like one of those Hiroshima shadows because someone might have a temper tantrum and knock the shit out of you cuz some invisible entity said you could...? She and her buddies stoning guys in public because...oh pick a reason. Doesn't seem to need any. Oh right, Allah says they can.
Women beheading men in the road because, oh I don't know, it's Tuesday? Women throwing acid in your face because she decided you insulted her in some way?
Yeah, I'm sure you guys would love that.
Edited to Add: I really want to know how much you'd enjoy the roles being reversed for what...? Centuries now? Having people like Uncle T up there, he's Auntie T now---Aunt Therarist getting angry because you dared showed your LEGS in public for a few years in the 1970s...? Uht Oh, Aunt T might spray her shorts, how dare YOU...!
Seriously? You'd be all right with that?
The Middle East was in Peace when the Old Persian Empire ruled that region. There were a few rebellions here and there but it was mostly Peaceful. The Old Persian Empire respected the Jewish State of Israel. They helped them rebuild their Sacred Temple as well. They never desecrated or Damaged the Ancient Structures which were built by the Sumerians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, Egyptians etc.
Yea and then Alexander the Great crushed the Persian empire
@@hjc7429 What happened after Islam took over the Middle East and Alexander's Macedonia in the form of the Ottoman Empire?
It's complicated and delicate.
Examples
1. The Persian Empire ruled the region, but their faith was Zoroastrian, not what it is today.
2. Alexander didn't "destroyed" anything. Persians had many conflicts, Chinese, Mongols, afghans, and sometimes lost, but they always came back. Again, today they seem to have lost for good, because they are not Zoroastrian anymore.
اسکندر یا لشکری از اروپا
بله به غارت سرزمین پارس پرداختند ولی پارسیان بیشترین لطمه را از حمله اعراب و مغول به خود دید زیرا علاوه بر غارت اموال و کشتن مردان و به بردگی گرفتن زنان و کودکان اسناد خطی زیادی یا در آتش سوخت یا به آب انداخته شد و از بین رفت که اگر بود خیلی زودتر از این ها به علم طب ابن سینا یا علم نجوم و ریاضی رازی یا ابوریحان بیرونی و خوازمشاهی دست میافتیم و این نمونه افراد را زودتر از اینها در تاریخ مشاهده می کردیم@@hjc7429
@@vladmatei1958 You don't get it do you? Islam ruined the Middle East. Zoroastrians didn't force their Religion upon others like the Islamists did.
Shah of Iran wasn't an anti Zionist, he totally appreciated the concept of Zionism, he also clearly called Palestinian activists bully and terrorist. He was frustrated for getting picked on by left wing radicals. He was a friend of Israel.
Israel is the friend you don't turn your back to..🗡
The Shah was never a Zionist, but he was not pro-palestine either. He had a realistic idea about Israel- Palestine conflict.
Mind Begs the Question:
▪︎If those once Dehumanized as Rats
▪︎Dehumanize others as Human Animals
▪︎Following footsteps of their Oppressors,no?
Is there a reason why PBD keeps absolving the US from the mess in the middle east? And no ... Israel has always been the reason for instability in the middle east even during the Shah's time.
So why were there major wars in the Middle East pre-1948? Israel didn't exist? Absurd.
Finally the Patrick I knew is back on point I’m glad your bringing out the truth to what happened to the Middle East,,!!
#JavidShah ,we people Iran want to have our king back. #KingRezaPahlavi
There was no peace in the Middle East under the Shah, this is complete nonsense. Yes, the violence has increased under the lsIamic republic, but it didn’t start with the revolution. The Arab-lsraeIi conflicts would take off every few years while the Shah was in powered. The Arab Socialists and the Pan-lsIamists have been at each others necks since Nassers Egyptian revolution. The Kurds had been rebelling against Iran, Syria, Iraq and Turkey since the French and the British divided up the region. This segment is complete nonsense.
PBD please have this guy on
His name is Nader Saiedi
He was my professor at ucla
He has a lot of information about what happend and what needs to be done
It will be a great show!
The main reason Spain took out the Arabs and Jews who are truly cousins out after 700 years.
The House of Sand and Fog is a movie that really brings this to life, and I can’t watch it without crying.
Israel never claimed to bring peace to the Middle East. Jimmy Carter was indeed horrible. But Israel has been attacked consistently even with Pahlavis. Israel didn’t topple Shah the west did. Islam itself deserves some credit for such undermining of Shah.
Nah who cares about the little hat people. They really really suck.
Israel is an illegal occupying white European colony. The shah was a puppet of the west. If he had any moral fabric, he would of never allowed for the Europeans to steal the land of the Persian Empire.
Eternal victims, it's getting tiring.
@@1Hash0 Wrong. Carter wanted him gone and they funded protests to overthrow him.
Iran has always been a country people want to take out in the West.
Iran is too smart.
Let's not give the mossad a pass either.
West talking about human rights and democracy but in reality they know one thing their interest
I’m out in the Middle East was at peace before the west came and put Israel. I don’t understand why y’all keep thinking the Middle East was always violence in the stabilized. It was always peaceful until France England and America came your president always say America has to protect his interest and interest of the private sector is to keep the Middle East and conflicts. Middle Eastern are not violence. Your private sector is.
That is not true at all.
PBD you always say, "future looks bright" but how? What can we do to change the past? to keep the world in peace, not just our region in the Middle East. Yes, there were countries in the past that took advantage of other countries and used their resources technically for free! But now everyone's awake. We need a non-biased person that brings peace to all nations and countries and unfortunately, in this world, that person does not exist, and believe it or not, history repeats itself
Huh?
Long Live President Trump and Long Live the Memory of Shah Pahlavi of Iran.
@@jackhurston667 trump is a zionist Jew who happens to be owned by IDF donors.
Installed in 1953, by CIA backed coup
Thank you for saying this loud
The shah wanted to go his way not USA way that’s when it kicked in he ain’t obeying the orders anymore 😮
❤ More power to you. with sharing and allowing people to face the reality to learn about real stories that has happened.
What the heck are you talking about? The Middle East has been continuously full of war and violence since WW1.
Iran itself was invaded in WW2 by the British and the Soviets. Then the elected prime minister of Iran was overthrown in 1953 by the British and the Americans.
There were 5 Arab-Israeli wars between 1948 and 1973. Along with numerous terrorism and counter-terrorism attacks.
And there was a huge and bloody civil war in Lebanon that started in the mid-1970s.
All of this happened while the Shah was there. He didn’t stop jack.
And while the Shah did economically modernize Iran using the oil money, he was also a dictator whose Savak secret police imprisoned and tortured tens of thousands of Iranians. Did you ever read “The Crowned Monkeys”?
He is a liar dude
The shah were supporting iraqi separists in north
Those dudes r clowns
هرچی که راجبش میخونی واقعی نیست جلوی جنگ های زیادی رو گرفت و یهودی هارو در ایران پناه میداد و اگه واقعا دیکتاتور بود اخوندا قدرت نمیگرفتن و همرو میکشت
One of my professors in college was Armenian that grew up in Iran. He told us how it had nightclubs😢, jeans, etc and 1 day they woke up and it changed instantly
December 31 1977!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Excellent video as always but here is my problem I have been making losses trying to make profit trading. I thought trading demo account is just like trading the real market... can anyone help me out or at least advise me on what to do
@HarperAsher-q3iYou're right! I have lost a lot trading all by myself without a guide. It's been an uneasy ride for me. Who is your mentor please. how can i reach her i really need help in this bear market now?
Just stop
God bless the soul of Shahanshah Arymehr, an amazing man lost tragically.
And what everything came about was Big Oil
Today, the USA is the world's largest oil producer. The world's fourth largest oil exporter. USA is Big Oil. Middle East is fair to middling oil.
@@toddtheisen8386 that's Today!! Back then our country was getting oil from the middle east
@@toddtheisen8386Only Europe buys overhyped and expensive Murican oil.
@@BruceJ999 13 million barrels a day. Someone is buying it. :D
@@toddtheisen8386 Who?? because the Global South sure hell doesn't buy that oil.
So how can PBD hate these guys if he sees the cause of the mayhem always comes from one entity? Does he think submission will liberate the people of Iran? Should they give up their sovereignty like the Europeans ?
When was the peace? In 1929?48? 56? 65? 73?
When?
Both you and Wayne are right but those were short-term conflicts, not long-tern all out wars like the recent one which has been going on since October 23.
Even though the shah wasn’t a big supporter of Zionism , he refused to intervene in the 6-day war of 1967. A historic testament of peace.
The shah is american puppet why will he intervene?
Great Informations!!!
PBD, I like you but actually during Shah’s time the Middle East was going through continuous turmoil including various Arab-Israeli wars, war in Algeria, civil war and Israeli occupation in Lebanon, Yemeni wars, and others.
Precisely, he’s totally delusional when it comes to the Shah.
yeah he has no clue what he's on about. No one would be going to Iran to go skiing over a beautiful country in Europe. To say the Middle East has ever been in peace under one particular person is totally ridiculous.
Please clarify, do you mean pre-cia-coup shah, or, post cia coup shah, idk presenter completely forgets about cia coup just like Waheed Ali on The Panel on Channel 10 (au)
Yes but Shah’s efforts at lobbying between Saadat and Robin is what led to camp David. But after revolution Carter took the credit and even won the noble peace prize for it.
@@Hermesborugerdian Idk if you can give the full credit to one person or the other. If it wasn’t for Egypt economics crisis and their need for US aid the deal may have never happened.
This guy can't lie with a straight face
Actually I was thinking about his face too a bit. I was thinking, either way, his face is perpetually in a guilty looking state. Is this because he is a very smart guy who has worked out that if you spout swamp propaganda like this the al gore rhythms will love you and get you in the millions, or, does he meet with cia guy in lonely alley and get that briefcase to pay for that luxurious lifestyle? Either way, it does not matter anymore. You have to give props to cia for bossing youtube, much better propaganda tool than pathetic Russian RT hehehe
Paid grifter
In 1975 Saddam invaded Iran over the Arvand border dispute with 150k men and was defeated in 1 month by a force a third of the size.
Looking forward to your book
Approximately date time do you think it would be released? Thank you for your great work keep going.
I drove across Iran.
Border to border in 1975 to London.
It was a well-known tourist trail .... then the Shah was kicked out.
First the all Shah not kick out ? He left the country and he didn't want to kill his people, go back to school and educate yourself.
Many have done it recently and they are all happy. Just search for their videos in TH-cam
So are you saying they will not allow you in today? The problem is not Iran or Iranians the problem is the West doesn't want to see Iran progress because of its history, they know these people are smart and if allowed they will compete with everyone, especially on weapons building which the US number 2 export after the Dollar,
Trump when he took the presidency focused on competition, China, Iran and Russia, Tariffs on China sanctions on Iran and he tried to end the gas supply to Europe from Russia,
Was Aqaeda and ISIS created by Iran or has anything to do with Iran? fact Iran is fighting ISIS and Al Qaeda, have you heard any Shia blow up himself for his religion?
The United States and Britain installed the colony called Israel to start conflict and terrorism in the middle east. Since Israel was installed in 1948 the middle east has not seen peace. Also It's totally disheartening that Islamic Iranians are erasing 6000 years of Persian civilization, history and rich culture. Alongside western colonization we also have Islamization going on around the world unquestioned.
While shah was in charge, there were 4 wars between Israel and Arabs. I don't know what he is talking about.
Exactly 😂
I know to come here if I need to hear the truth of events. Just a normal mum from Australia, totally flabbergasted of what is happening in the world.
Love to you all
Sorry Pat, but I think you forgot about the 1957, 1967 and 1973 wars while Iran was ruled by the Shah. Peace in the Middle East has always been tentative at best.
Well he meant we had less wars than now
Here in Ohio a women i talked to 30 plus years ago said her and husband and some friends of hers would go to Iran , Iraq ,Isreal for vacation doing the 1950's and 1960's and early 1970's and said it was wonderfull back then!
Same time somalia was a holiday destination 😢
The world went to shit mid 70s
Netanyahu is rael
This regime now is not good, but the Shah was not a good guy. He threw a lavish party in 1971, that would have costed 650 million dollars while his people starved. He had gained this power through a CIA backed regime change in 1953.
This lavish party that you speak of was frankly recommended by the UN, it was recommended so the rest of the world could have a better understanding of Iran’s history and culture.
مردم زمان شاه گشنه نبودن مردم الان گشنه ان حتی تو روستا ها مردم راحت زندگی میکردن راجب شاه ما درست حرف بزن
Saddam Hussein, and Kadafi also played a major role in stability in the Middle East. Once they were removed, terrorists took over. We all have to be honest about this, im not a fan of Saddam Hussein, but he kept Iraq in order and there was stability. PBD should also acknowledge this, despite it being an unpopular thing to say.
President Kaddafi was a big enemy of shah of Iran, he gave 200 million dollars to terrorist to help the revolution.
This is why I love this podcast, no podcast offers me more forbidden knowledge.
This is what the EU is making laws against as we speak. In ten years there will be European federal prison time for spreading anti narrative knowledge. We are running into a bleak future and fast, enjoy this and learn as much as you can👍
I'm iranian myself. The idea that U.S actively supported the revolutionaries to overthrow the Shah is not supported by historical evidence. I don't know about his other videos but in this one most of what he says is a conspiracy theory rather than an accepted hypothesis based on evidence. The consensus among historical experts is that the U.S was a strong supporter of the Shah. Iran was provided military and economic aid as a part of the broader cold war strategy. Declassified documents show the U.S was trying to preserve the Shah's regime and was caught off guard by the speed and success of the revolution.
@@SinaHeidari522 Look up Robert E. Huyser
"While the option of a pro-Shah military coup still was a possibility, Huyser met with Iranian Armed Forces leaders (but not the Shah), and established meetings between them and Khomeini allies, for the purpose of agreeing on Shapour Bakhtiar's transitional government." - Mission to Tehran by Andre Deutsch
"According to a newly released report by the US government, Huyser's main objective was to declare the US government's support for the military to prevent any possible coup of the army's frightened generals. Huyser also met with some opposition leaders like Mehdi Bazargan." - BBC
Israel Is a very important ally of the west in the middle east ... Always has been , but Patrick you are correct about Iran bring a important ally of the west until the 1979 revolution ...
Dear PBD, I am a Jew from Israel, hears and respects your words, Allow me to add and perhaps correct a little My grandfather, peace be upon him, from Mashhad Iran. He was an orphan, his parents suffered riots and had to live as Muslims on the outside. Pahlavi was perfectly fine with the Jews, but he lived a life of luxury, when his people were hungry...that's what brought him down. Regarding the Middle East.. there was a madman named Jamel Nasser who closed Suez in 1956 and the whole Middle East went up in flames.. so unfortunately there are too many dictators in the Middle East.. and even the Shah could not always control them.
Almost every country that lost its way had a turning point, I'm Nigerian and there's always talk of the glory days even during and immediately after colonialism but fact is bad leaders wreck countries and the Shah obviously wasn't a good leader. You only praise the Shah because of the alternative, but bad leaders tend to breed worse leaders and usually downhill from there.
The Shah was near perfect for Iran, he raised a poor underdeveloped country into a relatively prosperous.
What happened in 1979 was an un-holly alliance between the left, the Islamists and the 7 powerful oil companies who can be compared to the tech giants of today in terms of power and wealth.
Of course our people helped by allowing themselves to be coned and manipulated, but they regret it bitterly
The oil contract was coming up and the Shah wanted better terms and to take complete control of oil production and distribution.
Surely Nigerians have also experienced the detrimental effects of the the games played by world powers
@@rositatehrani8425 Well said
In 1980s to 1988, Isreal gave weapons and jets to Iran during Iran/Iraq war and Iran Ayutullahs gave them oil.....
Lets that sink in.....
Right away after the damned 'Khomaini' returned from France (where he got an overthrow full course..), he played
a very same game to start an Iranian revolution exactly similar to the French revolution which was led by the freemasonry.
Freemasons 😂And the earth is flat
@@arosrealtylondon
Both are not related, it's just the loop in your little brain.. You're making null sense.
I personally met the Shah and Farrah Diva in Panama while in exile, he was a great guy… Carter completely destroyed the World.
What are you talking about PBD… you need to educate yourself about the history of the Middle East.
During the 1973 Yom Kipper War when Arab countries cut off oil to the US, it was the Shah and Iran which kept oil flowing to the US Armed Forces.
I learn so much from listening this show....wow
Thanks for this info, I would definitely check this one...
PBD is also Iranian, what a coincidence😮
Yeah…so what???
Wow. Crazy how much times have changed the situation
Never knew Iran had mountains and snow!!!
last week suddenly it started to snow in Yazd in the middle of summer in the centre of sahara .
Iran has more snow than most of Europe.
The worst blizzard in human history happened there (1972) and they have incredible ski resorts.
Bcz your American
Iran has a very diverse climate. They have desert, arctic and even rain forest in the north.
@@Ruder6163Interesting
Pat, your blood and DNA is still Iranian, it's a shame whatever the Iranian population has been put through, an Iranian will always be an Iranian, be proud!
The U.S. has not caused all the conflicts and destabilization in the middle east . The vast amount of conflict is caused by the people of the M. East by way of their cultures especially tribalism and Islamic ideology ...
The usa pounce on them in ottaman empire the people had common ideals then the British promise the saud and hashimite families wealth and power
Yet Eurpope has had more battles and conflicts
When the hell has Israel ever claimed to facilitate peace in the Middle East? Lol
He’s referring to the Abraham Accords. What he, and many others, fail to understand is that none of the countries in the Abraham Accords were enemies. They had been secretly allied for a half a century.
Middle East never really has been at peace.
Exactly!!!!
I think PBD means Iran and not middle east, Iran was at peace, Middle east was far from being at peace.
You can thank America and Isreal for that.
Go back just over 100 years ago, middle East was in peace. It all started with the first terrorist attack by an Israeli.
Because of the peninsula
Your whole argument here is completely fallacious. Did you forget about the six day war? The Middle East was not at peace during the shahs but on the contrary, had conflicts going on all over the place.
Thanks pbd for the lesson . Much respect always
What lesson? He’s completely delusional when it comes to the shah. The Middle East wasn’t at peace when the shah was in power, it was more violent than it is today. You have the lsraeIi-Arab wars, the Kurdish wars against Iraq, Syria, Turkey and Iran and you had the secular pan-Arab nationalist vs the pan-Islamic monarchs. There’s less conflict in the Middle East today than there was back when the shah was in power.
Shah gave too many interviews to western journalists and they held it against him. He should not have done that, they didn’t deserved it. None of the monarchs give that many interviews.
Pat needs history lesson. Middle east had constant wars. And Iran was never "in charge" of middle east.
Nah brody you need a history lesson. Read the book the prize its a 800 page book on the history of oil. At one point iran was the strongest force in the middle east. Might have not been a long time but there was a snapshot in time when it was on top
You are right about the first part. However in terms of the second part, thats not quite accurate. Iran back then was kind of like Saudi right now. A stabilising factor on the region.
Keep in mind that even now with its current regime, Iran has a strong presence in the region. If they werent so destabilising on the region, they might have still been the main ''guy in charge'' instead of Saudi.
🤣🤣🤣
@@Tiasung who said Saudis are in charge rn? They can't even pull their pants on without US permission. Iran already built its shia empire in the middle East. And if you take a look at history, iranians and turks are always in charge of the middle east not Arabs.
What alternate reality is pbd living in? The US helped the revolution then (well well well) lost control of him. 😂
Some fact fo us citizen: First, mosadegh was not democratically elected. Second, the Shah was in power before Mosadegh. After the terror of Razmara by a radical group, the Shah selected Mosadegh to bring some peace to the people and help with oil nationalization. However, Mosadegh was just talk; and failed in all aspects of the economy, oil nationalization, politics, etc. The Shah had a prime ministers before Mosadegh, and according to Iranian law, the Shah had the power to remove Mosadegh, aftet Mosadegh Closed parliament , Shah send him dismissed from power order he first accepted then refused , army involved cause mosadegh start some riots .... so it was not a coup. A lot of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation is against shah. You know why right?
Actually it all started in 1948. Something happened that unleashed conflict in mid east. Also Shah of Iran forced women to take off their headscarf. You call that freedom? he was just another extreme opposite of the current regime.
Actually, no, there were many, many major conflicts before 1948 that is just flat-out false.
Your link for the invite to the a.i. webinar does not work! Tried 3 times over the past week. It says your registered but sends or gives no link. .Kind of ironic for tech. themed webinar and not a good look for you. Im give up
ايران لم تكن تحافظ على السلام في الشرق الأوسط، كانت فقط لاتتدخل في الدول
اگر شاه ایران نبود امروز کشور عمان هم مانند یمن بود.روزی که سلطان قابوس پادشاه عمان از شاه ایران برای گروهک های کمونیستی که توسط روس ها شورانده شده بودند درخاست کمک کرد این ارتش ایران بود که ظرف دو ذوز شورش کمونیست های عمان را سرجایشان نشاند و حتی سالها بعد سلطان عمان امنیت کشورش را مدیون شاه و ارتش ایران میداند.
ارتش ایران در جنگ حمله اعراب علیه اسرائیل هم به درخاست سازمان ملل برای ساختن امنیت منطقه حضور داشتند که با انقلاب اسلامی در ایران خمینی نیروهای ایران را از آن منطقه به ایران آورد چون خمینی مخالف صلح و آرامش در منطقه بود و بلافاصله جنگ با عراق را شروع کرد و بعدها گفت ما به جنگ احتیاج داشتیم و جنگ برای ما یک نعمت بود!. چون به بهانه جنگ خزانه را خالی کرد و تمام نیروهای متخصص و نیروی هوایی ایران را اعدام کرد و یا از کشور فراری داد و ارتش ایران را منحل کرد و از بین برد دقیقا اهدافی که انگلیس و روس ها در مورد ایران دوست نداشتند.مانند افغانستان که با ورود طالبان ارتش منحل شد و افراد متخصص یا کشته شدند یا از ترس طالبان از کشور فرار کردند و کشور خالی از ارتش و افراد متخصص شد که سالها آموزش دیده بودند
هنوز در دنیا خلبانان ایران رکورد دار بهترین پرواز جنگنده F14تامکت هستند.در زمان شاه ارتش ایران جزع پنج ارتش قدرتمند دنیا بود سرچ کنید تا ببینید
Iranian imperial army directly got involved in Oman and suppressed a communist coup. The immortal guards who were deployed there essentially preserved the Sultanates.
@@Hermesborugerdian
لان عمان نظام اباضي ، والفرق الضاله تحب بعضها
So how can you on one hand say Israel is right and America first when your entire heritage was torn apart by their influence? Into an island of instability
1965 war and October war were during the shah of Iran, Yemen civil war of 1965. Lebanon 1975 civil war.
@@horusksa1983 yep in beruit
@@jackson5781 guess where beirut is? Or did you mean the yemen civil war? Or egypt the October war?
@@horusksa1983 beruit is in Lebanon. And where the Lebanese malitia took over and caused a war from within and started a huge problem with Israel, Israel didn't want war. Lebanon was the problem. The Lebanese malitia when they had problems from within and Carter stuck his grizzly sticky hands in big oil it got worse. Carter should have left it alone
@@jackson5781 Yes but my point was even during the shah, the middle east wasnt in peace like PBD claimed
@@horusksa1983 that was also my point
Indeed!!! Love the Shah of Iran✨👑✨🌞❤️🔥🦁
I love your show, but here you wrong, because you don’t know the history or maybe for other reasons. Middle East was in war from 1948 then 1956, 1967, then 1973. If this is peace, I don’t know what is war.
Agree
From the early 1960's until the Revolution in Iran, thousands of Americans resided in Iran. At first it was mostly for the petroleum industry and some military advisors but later on when Iran began to purchase a lot of military hardware, most of it from the US, technical advisors, engineers and technicians from Boeing, Bell Helicopter, McDonnell- Douglas, Grumman, General Electric, Pratt and Whitney, Hughes Aircraft, etc began pouring in. The Imperial Iranian Air Force was the only military other than the US Navy which flew the F14 Tomcat.
My father worked for Sherkate Sahami Jeep in Iran from 1967 until 1973. Many Iranians that worked with my father advised him to leave and take his family with him as they knew things were going to get ugly. 60 Minutes did a story on Americans living in Iran titled "Yanks in Iran".
Patrick has it's own virtual reality historic facts.. *That made me laugh Good!.*
How do we listen to this podcast live ?
So much bullshit and misinformation here
I was detached to the USS Kitty Hawk in 1974 when we picked up the Shaw and took him to sea and performed an air show for him to prove our capabilities in protecting Iran. I couldn’t believe how fast everything went to hell after the 1979 revolution but it was all predicted in The Late Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsay in 1972
It’s true and I’m Israeli. My father flew fromTel-Aviv straight to Tehran. Said it was a great country.
I say this as an Iranian from inside Iran. The world will not see peace until Reza Shah II returns to Iran. The arms of the Islamic Republic reached Europe and America .You will experience disasters that you cannot even imagine. Like our previous generations who had no idea of the miseries after 1979
Say when
Let him know what's up. Pat
Right on brother
His perception of the Shah is completely delusional. There was plenty of conflict all over the Middle East when the Shah was empower.
absolutely correct thanks
This is total nonsense. There was still no peace in the Middle East when the shah was in power. The Arab-lsraeIi wars took place under the Shah. Every few years there would be an all out conflict between lsraeI and their neighbors. The Pan-Arab socialist and the pan-Islamist monarchies were regularly engaging in proxy wars all over the region. The Kurds had conflicts with Iraq, Syria, the shahs Iran and Turkey. This whole segment is complete rubbish. PBD has such a hard-on for the shah, he becomes totally delusional when he’s brought up.
Thank you very informative
Wasn’t there constant war in Beirut ?
@@eddiegill yes there was. Constant war
@@eddiegill and they made a movie about it too
Beirut is Lebanon is it not
@@cecilieluse5289 and the labanese malitia were dangerous as f
@@cecilieluse5289 it’s part of Middle East