Good morning Doctor from a rainy Sydney Australia. I didn't even know that there were Women who called out Feminism. You are the only one I've ever seen. Perhaps it's finally the beginning of the end for this destuctive 'acid'. It's important work you're engaged in. Thankyou.
Doing my undergrad at UBC, and my MSc at SFU, this was an eye opening revelation of how things have changed at SFU. In the 90s, I helped out Dr. Patricia O'Hagan in the Harassment Office, and helped her present at many of the harassment training sessions around campus. Her message was one of balance, how not everything is harassment, giving tangible examples of what may look like harassment, but is not. After leaving SFU in 1995, I was upset to hear about the Liam Donnelly controversy, which now has its own Wikipeida page, and led to the Fraser Institute paper "Liam Donnelly’s Conviction by Prejudice: Lessons for Harassment Policy" by David Finley. As an aside, Patricia did invite me as a guest lecturer at one of her Women's Studies classes. Talk about a "Strander in a Strange Land," a male computer nerd in a Women's Studies class, talking about gender issues in Computer User Interface Design." I was also the creator and instructor of SFU's first course in Computer User Interface Design. Yes, Patricia and I were good friends.
My understanding of feminism became crystal clear in a discussion with a feminist. We were discussing the subject of paper money versus metal coins. She favored abolishing paper money in all denominations in a favor of coins because coins are more durable. I said coins present a practical problem for men because men have no means of carrying them as women have purses. She cited her feminist credentials and said that in the feminist perspective, if something favors women and creates problems for men, men will simply need to find a way to cope with the action that is more favorable to women. End of discussion.
9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3
Historically she's right. You want eye opening... watch House of Garsenda by Useful Charts. It's long but shows the high probability that most of time has been matriarchy.
well, there are men's purses, pouches, and bags, that shouldn't be a great issue, but who really wants to carry coins instead of notes? the real question should be cash or cards, if they limit the use of cash in favor of cards we will all get screwed over time! that's a stupid perspective anyway, if the genders would be reversed there would be an outrage!
I thought that paper money was a more advanced development? That was how it was explained to me in school. The teacher went on about how the Chinese were more advanced than Europeans because they used paper money while the coin was the currency in Europe.
Like a truth ointment. Just wanna close my eyes and slouch in the chair and trust that Prof. F is gonna assure me that we haven't quite all gone MAD! We love you J. F.
The way feminism derisively "explains" men according to their own stereotypes while posing as benevolent saviors is so unbelievably arrogant. The problem is so many people accept that uncritically.
So the whole SFU 1997 Rachel Marsden/Liam Donnelly scandal has been conveniently forgotten about by SFU feminists. That case debunks every last argument they've got against a men's club. One of the first things an SFU men's club should do is erect a statue of Liam Donnelly right where the feminists would have to see it every day.
The rebuttal of the opposition to the Men’s Center is simple. Why is tue feminist framework (DEI) taken as sacred gospel in an academic setting? Is it the new state religion?
After almost ten years of watching these events, and beinable to eeethem againnow, I would be curious to revisit what has occurred since the creation of these videos.
My girlfriend at college in Vancouver (1988) was a self professed radfem and I learned a lot from her and her friends group. My main takeaway, and one of the reasons we broke up, was that while professing equality what they actually desired was societal dominance and not only the destruction of the patriarchy but also the decimation of the male ego, in particular, mine. The end of the relationship started when she spray painted the Granville Bridge with the words, "The average male is a petty rapist." Pardon me for taking umbrage with that sentiment.
They also regularly say "it's not my job to educate you" to cover for the fact that tyey're parroting and don't actually know what they're talking about
Those universities have lost their reason to exist. I speculate that the unavoidable reality checks people get when they enter the workforce, is precisely what eventually will make people realize how much they wasted their time by engaging with these ideas. I guess that's the point at which attendance will decrease.
God bless you abundantly Dr. Fiamengo.
Janice Fiamengo and Karen Straughan- two brilliant minds standing up to an ideology that has brainwashed so many - incredible
Good morning Doctor from a rainy Sydney Australia. I didn't even know that there were Women who called out Feminism. You are the only one I've ever seen. Perhaps it's finally the beginning of the end for this destuctive 'acid'.
It's important work you're engaged in.
Thankyou.
there are some women opposing feminism, she left some names on the video female white knights, there is the movement Women against feminism as well
Doing my undergrad at UBC, and my MSc at SFU, this was an eye opening revelation of how things have changed at SFU. In the 90s, I helped out Dr. Patricia O'Hagan in the Harassment Office, and helped her present at many of the harassment training sessions around campus. Her message was one of balance, how not everything is harassment, giving tangible examples of what may look like harassment, but is not. After leaving SFU in 1995, I was upset to hear about the Liam Donnelly controversy, which now has its own Wikipeida page, and led to the Fraser Institute paper "Liam Donnelly’s Conviction by Prejudice: Lessons for Harassment Policy" by David Finley.
As an aside, Patricia did invite me as a guest lecturer at one of her Women's Studies classes. Talk about a "Strander in a Strange Land," a male computer nerd in a Women's Studies class, talking about gender issues in Computer User Interface Design." I was also the creator and instructor of SFU's first course in Computer User Interface Design. Yes, Patricia and I were good friends.
My understanding of feminism became crystal clear in a discussion with a feminist. We were discussing the subject of paper money versus metal coins. She favored abolishing paper money in all denominations in a favor of coins because coins are more durable. I said coins present a practical problem for men because men have no means of carrying them as women have purses. She cited her feminist credentials and said that in the feminist perspective, if something favors women and creates problems for men, men will simply need to find a way to cope with the action that is more favorable to women. End of discussion.
Historically she's right. You want eye opening... watch House of Garsenda by Useful Charts. It's long but shows the high probability that most of time has been matriarchy.
Men would have no issue carrying coins though. I know I don't. Purses are less practical than wallets not more.
@ribbonsofnight Gee I mean I thought pockets solved it all.
well, there are men's purses, pouches, and bags, that shouldn't be a great issue, but who really wants to carry coins instead of notes? the real question should be cash or cards, if they limit the use of cash in favor of cards we will all get screwed over time! that's a stupid perspective anyway, if the genders would be reversed there would be an outrage!
I thought that paper money was a more advanced development? That was how it was explained to me in school. The teacher went on about how the Chinese were more advanced than Europeans because they used paper money while the coin was the currency in Europe.
Like a truth ointment. Just wanna close my eyes and slouch in the chair and trust that Prof. F is gonna assure me that we haven't quite all gone MAD! We love you J. F.
Excellent presentation. Thank you.
This woman is talking sense.
The way feminism derisively "explains" men according to their own stereotypes while posing as benevolent saviors is so unbelievably arrogant. The problem is so many people accept that uncritically.
please share these important videos
1st. . . Cheers from Chicago Prof. Fiamengo.
So the whole SFU 1997 Rachel Marsden/Liam Donnelly scandal has been conveniently forgotten about by SFU feminists. That case debunks every last argument they've got against a men's club. One of the first things an SFU men's club should do is erect a statue of Liam Donnelly right where the feminists would have to see it every day.
Can I ask why you're republishing now? Is it because they were previously thought to have been shadowbanned?
James Lindsay calls this "the iron law of woke projection" - whatever the woke criticise everybody else of doing, is what they're doing themselves.
The rebuttal of the opposition to the Men’s Center is simple. Why is tue feminist framework (DEI) taken as sacred gospel in an academic setting? Is it the new state religion?
Women get their rocks off on entering male spaces and ultimately destroying them
Where is Janice now?
On sub stack.
Is that Frank Zappa?
@@Jeremy-ho3viMale feminists are the ultimate in cowards
Obviously we recognise your selfless compassion for men too but fair play for the honesty
Appreciate ya. Thanks for sharing.
After almost ten years of watching these events, and beinable to eeethem againnow, I would be curious to revisit what has occurred since the creation of these videos.
Nothing good. It got a lot worse.
My girlfriend at college in Vancouver (1988) was a self professed radfem and I learned a lot from her and her friends group. My main takeaway, and one of the reasons we broke up, was that while professing equality what they actually desired was societal dominance and not only the destruction of the patriarchy but also the decimation of the male ego, in particular, mine. The end of the relationship started when she spray painted the Granville Bridge with the words, "The average male is a petty rapist." Pardon me for taking umbrage with that sentiment.
Oh I thought it meant 'shut the f...up'
Don't they tell men to "Educate other men"?
They also regularly say "it's not my job to educate you" to cover for the fact that tyey're parroting and don't actually know what they're talking about
Cant believe this is from 2015. Its gotten way worse.
Eventually they might understand that the Unis have been made redundant by the internet
Those universities have lost their reason to exist. I speculate that the unavoidable reality checks people get when they enter the workforce, is precisely what eventually will make people realize how much they wasted their time by engaging with these ideas. I guess that's the point at which attendance will decrease.
nice job Janice
The concept of institutionalized sexism at SFU is hilarious. That's like saying Disneyland fights against employees wearing costumes.
It’s the green west coast, so,no surprise.
lol, they Learm to employ fallacies. . . They’re probably mostly serious? I know I argue as hard as I can.
👍