Which country has the most powerful military: UK or France?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ต.ค. 2024
  • What are the latest figures regarding the UK's three armed services and how do they compare with the French, and does it really matter?
    Forces News looks at how many troops, warships and fighter jets the French and British Armed Forces can muster.
    More: www.forces.net/politics/france-v-uk-how-do-both-militaries-stack-comparison
    #forcesnews #nato #military #france #ukmilitary
    Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
    Check out our website: forces.net
    Facebook: / forcestv
    Instagram: www.instagram....
    Twitter: / forcesnews

ความคิดเห็น • 1.7K

  • @jimramsey8887
    @jimramsey8887 ปีที่แล้ว +1081

    I'm a Very old Brit and I am ashamed about many ridiculous comments about the French military. The Brits only talk about past glory that is in our favour. Don't forget the many extremely brave French people in occupied France in WWII and going back a bit further, Yorktown.. We all know what politicians are like on both sides but we are important allies and friends.

    • @richardsawyer5428
      @richardsawyer5428 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Well said. No doubt that there is banter between French and British warriors of equal stature but rude and inaccurate comments about their military is just plain wrong, especially if it dishonours any person putting themselves in harm's way for our collective good.

    • @labechamel75
      @labechamel75 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      Plus Brits tend to forget they escaped in Dunkirk during WWII and their army was saved by French!

    • @Englishman_and_mountains
      @Englishman_and_mountains ปีที่แล้ว +14

      ​@La Béchamel half of the solders rescued at Dunkirk were French and Belgian. Thousands of British soldiers died and got captured

    • @Englishman_and_mountains
      @Englishman_and_mountains ปีที่แล้ว +7

      ​@La Béchamel half of the solders rescued at Dunkirk were French and Belgian. Thousands of British soldiers died and got captured

    • @Englishman_and_mountains
      @Englishman_and_mountains ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ​​@VIPICCB8 😂😂😂 the British have a useless military? Then why have they won the most wars and battles between both countries? When fighting against each other

  • @Marshal_Dunnik
    @Marshal_Dunnik ปีที่แล้ว +663

    The French Army has better wine, the British Army has better tea

    • @elifitness1911
      @elifitness1911 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      😂😂😂😂

    • @mrcaboosevg6089
      @mrcaboosevg6089 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@louisdrouard9211 People say that but French food is vile, give me steak and chips over French food any day

    • @Jamirio
      @Jamirio ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@mrcaboosevg6089
      Well, whoever said that is either a hater or had zero experience... French food is easily amongst the best of the best...

    • @hudson7354
      @hudson7354 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Jamirio it’s not even close to being as good as Italian food, and Italy have more World cups than France

    • @synkaan2167
      @synkaan2167 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@hudson7354 world cups 😂

  • @jackwoodason9908
    @jackwoodason9908 ปีที่แล้ว +467

    Glad to have France as our ally! 🇬🇧 🇫🇷

    • @Zoonjse
      @Zoonjse ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Iceland here, good friends

    • @pingspiritpingspirit4099
      @pingspiritpingspirit4099 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Des amis comme vous... On n'a pas besoins d'ennemis ! Humour...

    • @fabs8498
      @fabs8498 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Glad to have UK as our ally

    • @AROSTARctb10
      @AROSTARctb10 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Glad to have our best friend Portugal 🇵🇹🇬🇧

    • @quentinp45
      @quentinp45 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Glad to have Uk as ally !

  • @yanflt7198
    @yanflt7198 ปีที่แล้ว +385

    As a French, I like to have a rivalry with the English, whom I consider as our oldest enemies. I often make little jokes about them, I tackle them nicely, etc... But if I hear someone else (from another country) criticizing the English people, then I defend them even better than if I were defending myself: nobody attacks our old English friends!
    French and English: the oldest rivals but also the oldest friends 🇫🇷🤝🇬🇧

    • @spitfires1979
      @spitfires1979 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      That’s good to hear, my friend - thank you. Likewise, the English would never stand by and watch a Frenchman or his country be harmed. Good neighbours are not always best friends but they are there for each other when it really matters. Vive La France.

    • @thomasmuller2233
      @thomasmuller2233 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leche cul

    • @user-mg3xr9tz7m
      @user-mg3xr9tz7m ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Oldest friends? So 700 years of war and about 100 years of strained cooperation makes you state that? Delusional…

    • @yanflt7198
      @yanflt7198 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@user-mg3xr9tz7m As the saying goes, “Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.” We've been doing that for centuries and look how close we've become ! History is full of twists and turns, and just like a good marriage, we've had our ups and downs! After all, it takes time to build a solid friendship 😉

    • @spitfires1979
      @spitfires1979 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@user-mg3xr9tz7m You’re delusional if you think that anyone still cares about Agincourt and distant historical conflict. France and Britain aren’t unbreakable allies and closely tied culturally. The last century has seen a complete re-invention of the two country’s political and social relationship, the 2 World Wars and the cold war having much do do with it, and the huge numbers of citizens from both sides of the channel living in the other country. The relationship is only ‘strained’ when one leader or another chooses to inflame a little tension to detract from his domestic issues.

  • @ryanschrimpf8163
    @ryanschrimpf8163 ปีที่แล้ว +518

    The UK and France are two of the greatest military (and cultural) powers to ever exist. They laid the framework for every other successful modern military. Glad to have them both as allies! 🇬🇧🇫🇷 much love from a grateful American.

    • @dazvanth
      @dazvanth ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Much love to you also my American brother, coming from the UK. It irritates to see many foolish people in the comments and elsewhere spending more time crying and insulting allied countries instead of acknowledging that we all have strengths that, when united, make us an undisputed force to be reckoned with. They're like a cancer within. The best of us will always be loyal to each other. 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇫🇷

    • @ryanschrimpf8163
      @ryanschrimpf8163 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      @@dazvanth absolutely, sir! You have said it beautifully. I could care less about the detractors. The USA wouldn’t exist without the UK and France. It’s awesome that we’re such close allies now and hopefully we get a free trade agreement between the UK and US asap! God bless you and His Majesty, my friend! 🇬🇧🇺🇸

    • @sylvainduret9880
      @sylvainduret9880 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Vive la Liberté !

    • @dazvanth
      @dazvanth ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@ryanschrimpf8163 May God bless you too brother! ❤

    • @limitlessLtd
      @limitlessLtd ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We are glad to have America as an ally, your military wipes the floor with literally every other nations including Chinas. God bless America, Vive le France, and God save the King!

  • @tonyjedioftheforest1364
    @tonyjedioftheforest1364 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    I am glad France is one of our best allies. I know we have little quarrels like all couples do but at the end of the day we love each other and if someone was to attack us we would be stronger together.

    • @GolgothFranc
      @GolgothFranc ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Atleast we did proper war, fought with respect of the chivalry code, when i see the WW1 mess and how Irak got destroyed by USA, i get nauseous.

    • @TheHugo215
      @TheHugo215 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Like an ex-girlfriend we still love 💗

    • @alexisbelfer7881
      @alexisbelfer7881 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TheHugo215 more like a brother we used to fight agaisnt when young kid.

    • @theGEOm
      @theGEOm ปีที่แล้ว

      Je suis entièrement d'accord

    • @drschnaps8081
      @drschnaps8081 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I only love english people that doesn't bash my country and respect it.

  • @allgood3192
    @allgood3192 ปีที่แล้ว +415

    The experience accumulated by England and France in the number of operations, battles and wars is absolutely monstrous. This military alliance between our two countries is really a good thing.

    • @mrfrisky6501
      @mrfrisky6501 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      England?? - its the UK

    • @shacklock01
      @shacklock01 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@mrfrisky6501 Not for much longer at this rate. No celt wants to be ruled endlessly by the tory party and I don't blame them.

    • @MC-cg2rr
      @MC-cg2rr ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Is it though? The UK seems to only be able to follow Uncle Sam…

    • @mrfrisky6501
      @mrfrisky6501 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@shacklock01 well I'm Scottish and I can tell you the majority of the people in Scotland want to remain as part of the UK- we won the independence vote and the SNP are still a minority party.

    • @jfrancobelge
      @jfrancobelge ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@MC-cg2rr Both the UK and France are NATO members anyway, in the same boat as the U.S.

  • @rosbifle413
    @rosbifle413 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I'm English but I live in France. We are brothers. We became so strong fighting each other. Vive la France and long live England.

    • @Charles-du5yt
      @Charles-du5yt หลายเดือนก่อน

      more like distant cousins France brothers are Netherlands Belgium Luxemburg and Germany maybe Austria but that seems to be a bit too far

    • @rosbifle413
      @rosbifle413 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Charles-du5yt .....you never heard of William the conquerer? You know where he was from?

  • @Walterwaltraud
    @Walterwaltraud ปีที่แล้ว +495

    Made me chuckle: "and of course, we're allies".
    Probably worth mentioning after hundreds of years when it was the opposite.

    • @diggit67
      @diggit67 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I was about say the same thing is it like we're both shake hands and smile but we all both have knives in the back ready and waiting god bless rugby 🏉 after hundreds of years of fighting 😆😆

    • @adoatero5129
      @adoatero5129 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      - "Probably worth mentioning after hundreds of years when it was the opposite."
      Propagandists of hostile countries also constantly work hard on social media to get people of the democratic countries to see other democratic countries as their enemies and in general negatively, so it's good to counter that influence with realism.

    • @richardsawyer5428
      @richardsawyer5428 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      We're siblings. The two nations squabble and call eachother rude names but won't let others bully them.

    • @Alan74_ynwa
      @Alan74_ynwa ปีที่แล้ว

      Allies officially but I'm happy to be living on the south coast incase our 'allies' invade. Got my Russian made shovel at the ready😂

    • @peterlubbers5947
      @peterlubbers5947 ปีที่แล้ว

      My thoughts exactly!😉🙏

  • @goeast12
    @goeast12 ปีที่แล้ว +243

    The French certainly get high marks from every American that has trained with them and their ability to sustain a fight far from home is very impressive. The US is fortunate to have allies like the French and Brits.

    • @l-esprit_de_l-ouest
      @l-esprit_de_l-ouest ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Not allies but vassals.

    • @kettle4316
      @kettle4316 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      ​​@@l-esprit_de_l-ouest what have you been smoking

    • @mathieumercier7936
      @mathieumercier7936 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​​@@kettle4316 Just look at the last 30 years, and you'll see it's true.
      When France didn't go to Iraq following USA's obviously fake evidences of mass destruction weapons, USA started to boycott French products.
      Then you got all the fines USA inflicted to French companies for activities conducted on foreign territory, often used to destabilize French economy and key companies such as Alstom (which produces nuclear gear used for French military and civilian industry and whom one of its high ranking employee got sequestrated by FBI and imprisonned for acts he did not commit on USA's territory) sold for a portion of its real value to a dying General Electrics against a promise to pay their fine (obviously that was a lie).
      The economic warfare is not only USA vs China, it's USA vs the world, and European countries got pretty much vassalised.
      Add to that how USA is forcing NATO members to buy their military equipment from them exclusively when Europe already has an industry : Germany went for the F35 instead of the Typhoon or the Rafale. An they even put all their pressure to make Australia break their engagement with France for their navy and to buy from them oversized, over expensive ships in order to 1 : get money and 2 : have a stronger vassal to fight the Chinese in the pacific.
      There's also all the spying going on for several years now : each European country has a portion of its politicians spied on by NSA, sometimes with the help of European countries such as Denmark, sometimes simply with illegal phone hacking etc.
      So much care given to their allies...
      With such kind of allies, we don't need ennemies.

    • @gringologie9302
      @gringologie9302 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@kettle4316 we want france out of NATO and UE. We want our independence back. You can perfectly understand that.

    • @l-esprit_de_l-ouest
      @l-esprit_de_l-ouest ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kettle4316 you just probe americans are memes.
      Too stupid to understand basics about geopolitics.
      Nato have no purpose to France, us + uk are blowing on the fire in Europe it happened in yougoslavia and now in Ukraine.
      Hopefully world economy is going out of dollar and you will pay the bill .

  • @mylesbamford-lewis554
    @mylesbamford-lewis554 ปีที่แล้ว +312

    Military doctrines for the 2 countries are completely different as well. France has an emphasis on mobility so their armour tends to be lighter but more agile which is how they were quite effective in Mali

    • @fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617
      @fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Coping? Rather than embarrass yourself by going to the ‘their different’ actually push your elected officials to rebuild the military!

    • @dracoboomin6511
      @dracoboomin6511 ปีที่แล้ว

      France was useless in Mali hence the Malians kicking them out for Wagner.

    • @josephkaz9093
      @josephkaz9093 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Didnt they have to rely on the RAF to provide lift capability?

    • @fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617
      @fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@josephkaz9093 the RAF relied on the USAF the so does everyone. It’s not right. Why should they protect us when looking at the state of our military and the budget, recruitment numbers and the media make it look like we’re not even prepared to protect ourselves?

    • @steveh5005
      @steveh5005 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@josephkaz9093 in Mali correct...

  • @Thumder75
    @Thumder75 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    As a French I have to say I really smile at the last sentence « and of course we are ally ».
    After fighting together for centuries we finally managed to get together 🤗👍

    • @CazTanto
      @CazTanto ปีที่แล้ว +14

      We love to hate each other; hate to love each other (at least to admit it). But woe betide any nation that dares mess with either one of us, for they will face the wrath of sisters! ❤️🩶💙

  • @philchristmas4071
    @philchristmas4071 ปีที่แล้ว +194

    Both great militaries and as an American I sleep better at night knowing we all fight together. 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇫🇷

    • @jimramsey8887
      @jimramsey8887 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Thanks! It is all about Cooperation and workong together. A Great thanl you to your brave countrymen in WWII

    • @colinmathieu3262
      @colinmathieu3262 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      🇬🇧🇺🇸🇫🇷💙🤍❤️

    • @thegto8535
      @thegto8535 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Fight together ? That's a bit of a stretch. It may be true for USA and GB but i don't think you have the same relationship with France, especially these last few years.

    • @tonyhancock4258
      @tonyhancock4258 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And lost together in Afghanistan and Iraq. 👌

    • @philchristmas4071
      @philchristmas4071 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonyhancock4258 Yeah we killed Bin Laden and tens of thousands of terrorists. Then we destroyed the Iraq military like it was a practice game, killed most of Saddam Husseins family and handed Saddam off to the Iraqi people to be lynched so I would call that a pretty good day. Oh you thought we were there to take the countries, no we're not like Russia we just try to liberate and hand off to the people.

  • @artymiomio8491
    @artymiomio8491 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    just a quick correction, a 5th generation fighter jet isn't necessarely better than a 4.5, in the case of the rafale jet and the F-35, the french jet has shown better results than its american concurrent (pardon my English...)

    • @TeamOfWings
      @TeamOfWings ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It’s also much much cheaper to maintain in condition. The F35 is crazy expensive

    • @GaspardLeTetard
      @GaspardLeTetard ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@TeamOfWings and cant fly that much. it's down times for maintenance are huge

    • @harrycox8085
      @harrycox8085 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Rafale cannot conduct the same mission sets as an F-35...

    • @TeamOfWings
      @TeamOfWings ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@harrycox8085 perhaps not. It also doesn’t cost the GDP of a small nation just to keep in working condition

    • @GaspardLeTetard
      @GaspardLeTetard ปีที่แล้ว

      @@harrycox8085 which is staying in a hangar 90% of their life time, what a mission 😉

  • @archvaldor
    @archvaldor ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Is any one else just sick of the trashing of the French that goes in the UK media? France is a fantastic country with wonderful people.

  • @henricloclo1598
    @henricloclo1598 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    You forgot to mention that the french aircraft carrier is nuclear powered has catapults and stop bits and carriers 40 Rafale which are french made (as good or even better than the F-35 (which are American made ) you just have to look at the competitions in India, Indonesia, United Arab Emirates, Grece and so on and remember : it’s not because you are “stealth” that we can’t see you 🙃) and always carries airborne nuclear bombs as well as aerial surveillance aircrafts. Still concerning the navy, you forgot to mention that France has 3 helicopter carriers :).
    Last but not least, the French aircraft carrier was completely modernized 3 years ago and cannot absolutely not be referred to as “old”. The remarks regarding the Rafale and the F-35 for the navy also applies to the Air Force.
    Thank you for the well made vidéo tough. Greetings from Switzerland.

    • @AngelinaJolie734
      @AngelinaJolie734 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      And if Brithish Army want new airplanes, we will be very happy to sell you some Rafales.

    • @EnglishScripter
      @EnglishScripter ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Rafales are no where near as good as the F-35, which is American and British made. The F-35 could fire missiles and be 150nm away before the Rafale even knew it had been fired upon. British Destroyers are MUCH better than the French, the French even preferred HMS Duncan over its own fleet.

    • @antoinesalou1072
      @antoinesalou1072 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@EnglishScripter In the first place the rafale and the f35 are two aircraft which have a similar score if we look at the great majority of international reports and competition reports (in spite of all the technical deficiencies that the f35 still knows nowadays). unfortunately for the detractors of dassault aviation, the f4 version of the rafale (last modernized version) has just been released... Thus, the rafale still confirms its position as "the best fighter aircraft in the world" ;)
      The french sailors prefer your fregates ? i remind you that the french navy received for the third year in a row the "Hook 'Em award" delivered by the us navy. this highlights the quality of the french fregates especially in term of anti underwater detection. The americans also recognize that the french are better than them in this field.

    • @EnglishScripter
      @EnglishScripter ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@antoinesalou1072 Its a destroyer... and the F-22 and F-35 could easily destroy a rafle.

    • @mikelovesbacon
      @mikelovesbacon ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm sorry did you just claim the old Rafales are as good as the brand new F35s?

  • @alumni2a692
    @alumni2a692 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    Quick note about the french Navy: it possesses 3 modern mistral class LHDs.

    • @thomassenbart
      @thomassenbart ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Which are very impressive vessels.

    • @laurentboitouzet9793
      @laurentboitouzet9793 ปีที่แล้ว

      Plus the Charles de Gaulle IS the only non us nuclear powered carrier, and it has a CATOBAR system.

    • @rayofhope1114
      @rayofhope1114 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes but the UK has 6 amphibious vessels - a different configuration certainly but a very flexible force. It is an issue where most comparative analyses only take the basic Wikipedia navy list but the UK has the RFA and Serco to add to the list of ships. Overall the tonnage of the total RN is almost twice the size of the French

    • @sayzen4588
      @sayzen4588 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@rayofhope1114 But we have a nuclear carrier

    • @rayofhope1114
      @rayofhope1114 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sayzen4588 The nuclear part is the propulsion system and not the armament. Having a nuclear boiler fir a steam turbine does not make the ship more powerful as a weapon. In fact with only one ship having nuclear propulsion is a disadvantage - diplomatic visits are restricted and you always need escorting fleet which are not nuclear powered - therefore you need a tanker support to fuel the fleet of ships in any case. It only makes sense to have a nuclear powered ship if you have many of them . All France has gained is a more expensive ship that needs long periods of repair and refuelling.. one ship is not a full capability - you. Need at least two ships to give cover.

  • @JohnDoe-cr6ct
    @JohnDoe-cr6ct ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I remember reading the blog of a US military in Afghanistan who was embedded with french army. He was telling something like “The only soldiers here who really want to fight are the Americans, Brits and French.”

    • @hudson7354
      @hudson7354 ปีที่แล้ว

      They all ended up running out though.
      The Italians performed better in Afghanistan, much better

    • @JohnDoe-cr6ct
      @JohnDoe-cr6ct ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hudson7354 About the Italians this US Marine also said that "the Italian Army, was widely believed to have paid the Taliban not to attack them".
      I'm not sure we can call that an amazing performance!!!
      Just google "Chris Hernandez working with French Army" you'll find that blog easily.

    • @Tunechi241
      @Tunechi241 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@hudson7354 Yes by bribing local warlords

    • @LOeuffy
      @LOeuffy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you refering to the blog named "working with the french army"? I read it one time, it was such a pleasure to read this blog after decades of french-bashing.

    • @christoguichard4311
      @christoguichard4311 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about the Danes???

  • @ouafallouz
    @ouafallouz ปีที่แล้ว +20

    When Britain and France work together and go along well, there is no other military power in Europe that can realistically stop us, not even Russia. Vive l'amitié franco-britannique 🇫🇷🇬🇧

    • @mrsentencename7334
      @mrsentencename7334 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      completely agree. If Germany bucks her ideas up and Italy gets involved with Poland holding the line i don''t see how Russia can do anything

  • @grill38
    @grill38 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    France has a special unit force called Antoine Dupont as well !

  • @saladv6069
    @saladv6069 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    As an American, it’s France. No contest.

    • @guillaumel9977
      @guillaumel9977 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Agree with you brother

    • @Spartan-jg4bf
      @Spartan-jg4bf ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Erm, no! When did France last win a war on its own??

    • @LOeuffy
      @LOeuffy ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As a french, it's really not important, we're all allies and as NATO members we need to help each other in times of need. Glory to our alliance, blue white red gang lmao.

    • @guillaumel9977
      @guillaumel9977 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Spartan-jg4bf Who care’s ? France got the hugest number of victory a nation ever had.

    • @Spartan-jg4bf
      @Spartan-jg4bf ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Guillaume L That are not relevant in the modern era. The current French military could not do an operation like Britain did in the Falklands

  • @BuddySpike101
    @BuddySpike101 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    The French carrier has a catapult system which means they can launch their E2-D Hawkeye from the carrier for early warning. We can’t do that. Because we couldn’t even afford a catapult on our carriers.

    • @murphy7801
      @murphy7801 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      It's also a nuclear carrier which the UK also doesn't have.

    • @johnalmason
      @johnalmason ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @murphy7801 - The two new Royal Navy carriers were designed and built with conventional propulsion instead of nuclear because it meant they could operate with a smaller crew (nuclear powered vessels need an entire department of nuke-qualified officers and ratings, thereby increasing the size of the ship's company). It also meant that they could navigate and operate in areas of the world where nuclear-powered vessels are banned, for example the Suez Canal.

    • @alexmas9086
      @alexmas9086 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ​@@johnalmason the french carrier already mass throught suez canal

    • @TheTraveller20081
      @TheTraveller20081 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@murphy7801 no, that's the future carrier. The Charles de Gaulle is conventionally-powered

    • @mathieu722
      @mathieu722 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@TheTraveller20081 No, France is the only country outside the US to have a nuclear-powered carrier. The CdG is nuclear, not conventional.

  • @oliviermancy4676
    @oliviermancy4676 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    We are brothers. The very first friends we made after moving from Paris to South-west France were british. Just because they were constantly laughing in that restaurant lunching on a table next to ours, we invited them at our place to have coffee right after their desert and despite the fact we had some political differences (some tories, some labours) we had a great time and still do. It was eleven years ago and after many shared X'mas and bbq's, we are friends with dozens of british families. Some left and some are newcomers. The drift is still.

  • @philippwidenfels8182
    @philippwidenfels8182 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    We are brothers , brothers do quarrel but family is family

    • @mrsentencename7334
      @mrsentencename7334 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the competition is why each country was so great, we need to keep a friendly rivalry going

  • @olivierpuyou3621
    @olivierpuyou3621 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    What is symptomatic of British military spending much higher than that of France while having a smaller and certainly less seasoned army is the fact that France manufactures practically everything itself and only buys the minimum in other countries.
    This also means that French arms exports are much more than those of the United Kingdom.
    Neither France nor the French would ever agree to be like the English, almost dependent on the US for its security.
    Now we are allies, so the weaknesses of one can be compensated by the strengths of the other, but we must, all of us Western European countries, strengthen our armies and our navies as quickly as possible.
    Winter is coming 😐

    • @skylinecams7851
      @skylinecams7851 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      "almost entireley dependent on the us for security" what plannet are you on, the military needs are completely different. we are on an island guarded by the sea, we dont a large standing army. By tonnage we have a larger navy than the rest of europe combined all desinged and built right here in the UK

    • @snowtfl5617
      @snowtfl5617 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I don’t think you understand the British military at all its more then capable of protecting itself through its navy which is more advanced then France and every. Other European nation its nuclear subs patrol the seas their army is small due to the fact they have no need of a massive one throughout their history they maintained a small professional army until wartime then it would expand

    • @gareth4592
      @gareth4592 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      The UK doctrine is all about Navy, theres no land border to defend so having a massive Army isnt that important. France on the otherhand is mixed doctrine but historically more focused on Land. Thats because the best way to attack France is via the European plain. UK is better on the Seas, France is better on land. Makes perfect sense

    • @Spartan-jg4bf
      @Spartan-jg4bf ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @Skyline Cams Sorry, total nonsense, the RN is the largest by tonnage in Europe, but its nowhere near more than all the European navies combined

    • @labechamel75
      @labechamel75 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      The budget does not mean anything if you fabricate your armament at home. Only 3 countries in the world are fully independent concerning their military-industrial complex: USA, Russia and France. As France does not have any go-between foreign partners in the fabrication process, France needs less budget compared to the UK.

  • @YARROWS9
    @YARROWS9 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    France is a great military power. Glad they are on our side. Vive la France 🇫🇷 🇬🇧

    • @LOeuffy
      @LOeuffy ปีที่แล้ว

      Glory to our british allies. Long live the United Kingdom.

  • @stevecroft3973
    @stevecroft3973 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Uk should open up a defence industry again and bring back the respect and honour of itsself aswell as its independence in not relying on the US to provide and make everything ! Would create more jobs , and bring back the steel works , would get smaller towns more infrastructure and could build a better bond with uk allies.
    Selling UK arms could be a game changer in our economy , we've been one of the best providers in history when it comes to making military equipment , just don't be selling it to Iran and training chinease pilots again please 😀 👍

    • @arbiter9187
      @arbiter9187 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      We do have a defensive industry, BAE systems for example, which is all the previous industry that we had but amalgamated into one thing. The problem is the government don’t invest enough into helicopters and cargo aircraft.

    • @stevecroft3973
      @stevecroft3973 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Arbiter well yets get rid of this perthetic torie goverment and change uk future for the better 🇬🇧. Sick to death of my people struggling continuously yet they get pay rises every term and bring in laws and tax rises that effect out forces and public sector workers. Gotta be the worst goverment performance in 30 years !

    • @johnscone9382
      @johnscone9382 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@arbiter9187 Agree, but the industry needs to expand again, round the clock production, especially ammo, missiles, weapons, maybe they’ll use the new budget defence spending on this. But UKs biggest problem is manpower.

    • @atomic4650
      @atomic4650 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That's what is most impressive about France's millitary. Pretty much all of their equipment is homemade

    • @richardsawyer5428
      @richardsawyer5428 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree. Just look at all those apprentices that worked on the aircraft carriers. Our engineers, shipbuilders, etc are some of the best on the planet. We're more than capable of making kit that our friends and allies need.

  • @nelvaldo.4850
    @nelvaldo.4850 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    IM ENGLISH AND I LOVE FRANCE ❤.

  • @jimdoyle8757
    @jimdoyle8757 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    We've had some scraps with the noisy neighbours for nearly a thousand years and we have this love hate relationship with them but im glad they are an allie of ours 🇬🇧🇫🇷

    • @tonyz7216
      @tonyz7216 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ha ha! I liked your comment !😘 from 🇫🇷!

    • @LOeuffy
      @LOeuffy ปีที่แล้ว

      Well said.

  • @BruneSixtine
    @BruneSixtine ปีที่แล้ว +7

    We're close friends and our countries are very similar on so many levels, our 2 armies struggle with the same challenges. I wish we both get better political leaders to solve our problems, which are most of the time very similar.

  • @pochtronvirelune25
    @pochtronvirelune25 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Something that is not taken in account here is the tremendous gap between France and UK about dependancy of military equipment provide by foreign countries (USA). UK is a follower of the USA, France isn't. Doing its own wars and military operation where she wants most of the time.

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The UK isn't restricted when in can fight.

    • @adelaidesngan604
      @adelaidesngan604 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@davidhouseman4328 English army RUNNING top 1 🏃🏃🏳️

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adelaidesngan604 thanks.

    • @GonzoTehGreat
      @GonzoTehGreat ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What military equipment does the UK depend on the USA for which France doesn't?

    • @noelgrippen4707
      @noelgrippen4707 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Mali was anything but an independent operation, it wouldn't of been possible without the heavy lift capabilities from the US and UK. France struggles to deploy without help from allies.

  • @TheDanielb554
    @TheDanielb554 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    The British and French also work very closely on many projects even though we have the banter.

    • @paxundpeace9970
      @paxundpeace9970 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Called Nato

    • @TheDanielb554
      @TheDanielb554 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@paxundpeace9970 no that is alot bigger i mean Anglo French only.

    • @Boeing777FR
      @Boeing777FR ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Honestly when we work together we achieve great things 🇫🇷🇬🇧

    • @mrcaboosevg6089
      @mrcaboosevg6089 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@paxundpeace9970 UK and France have been together on nearly everything since WW1, NATO is a defensive pact and isn't much help to either nation unless it's attacked

  • @AngloSupreme
    @AngloSupreme ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I respect the French military past and present, I get the banter between Britain and France but too many are far too serious. 🇬🇧🤝🇲🇫

  • @TheNinjaGinger
    @TheNinjaGinger ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Technically the RAF has 30 F-35B's although three of those reside in the US for testing, as for the RN element of F-35s, the two RAF units are jointly flown and maintained by RAF & RN personnel. The first Naval Air Squadron is supposed to stand up this year but that is currently unknown as they don't have any building space and Marham and the MoD have no money to retrofit and build new facilities for them for the area they are supposed to go.

    • @ghostwriter2031
      @ghostwriter2031 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You just summed it up very well. The MOD doesn’t have enough money to upgrade Marham. Oh wow we technically have 30 F-35’s but not the infrastructure to support them 😂 British Defence at its finest

    • @TheNinjaGinger
      @TheNinjaGinger ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @VIPICCB8 The whole American pilots & American flight deck crew couldn't be anymore wrong, there is a shortage of pilots with 617 and 207 help supply if needed. The Royal Navy has enough trained crews for both carrier to operate concurrently. As for "light carrier", The Queen Elizabeth class is not one of those, that would be for the US Amphibious assault ships. With regard to PWLS not having an air wing is in no way connected to damage to the prop, trying to connect the two is a desperate attempt to argue against it and the tug comment is totally fabricated and false.

    • @conan5300
      @conan5300 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@TheNinjaGinger He's a troll don't bother replying. Most of that post is false flag waving nonsense.

    • @TheNinjaGinger
      @TheNinjaGinger ปีที่แล้ว

      @danthecarguy3870 To what stupid projects are you referring to?

  • @labechamel75
    @labechamel75 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Vive la France 🇫🇷 !

  • @randombillyn
    @randombillyn ปีที่แล้ว +12

    France also have 3 Mistral class helicopter carriers

  • @BG-oj6zt
    @BG-oj6zt ปีที่แล้ว +34

    The Reafal is a phenomenal jet.....

    • @hervescellier6943
      @hervescellier6943 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Rafale

    • @ommsterlitz1805
      @ommsterlitz1805 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      0:47 biggest joke in here, Typhoon and Fcrash-35 are not in the slightest as capable as the Rafale is lmao

  • @THEBES86
    @THEBES86 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    polite reminder that we are allies at the end :)

    • @mikerigley1
      @mikerigley1 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I was expecting “but remember, they are French, so we’d beat them anyway.”

    • @latch9781
      @latch9781 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *T's & C's apply*

    • @patsanters2741
      @patsanters2741 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mikerigley1 We'd throw Onions at them 🤣

    • @Rampart.X
      @Rampart.X ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Frenemies

    • @johnmontgomery4923
      @johnmontgomery4923 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      pOLITE REMINDER. THE FRENCH LIKE TO DROP THEIR WEAPONS AND RAISE THEIR HANDS

  • @DesignGeek06
    @DesignGeek06 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I feel both the UK and France are like two brothers. When they were young, they were always getting into fist fights, now they are older the fights are just bickering and getting on each other’s nerves from time to time. But heaven help you if someone outside the family picks a fight with one of them, as the other will jump in and fight tooth and nail to help.

  • @v.7232
    @v.7232 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Also, france has a total of 406 leclercs, 191 are in storage but can be operational in a very short timespan.

    • @plamantin2937
      @plamantin2937 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol id want to see that

    • @v.7232
      @v.7232 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@plamantin2937 i must clarify, getting the storaged tanks operational is different from getting them to the same variant. I have no info on which variant/upgrade/etc these are.

    • @plamantin2937
      @plamantin2937 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@v.7232 they have been canibalise for years now, There is no way France field more than 200 tanks at one time

    • @ptranchand52
      @ptranchand52 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@plamantin2937 225 are in active service and modernized to the last standards, you are right, the other are in reserve at different stage of use. the problem is about the engine. it's a combination of a turbine for the compression and a diesel engine, very impressive and powerful engine, a little capricious at the beginning. this engine is no more produced and the spare parts must be produced by other manufacturers or cannibalize from existing Leclerc. this is a big problem at this time.

    • @plamantin2937
      @plamantin2937 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ptranchand52 225 on services mean There are about 170 that are not on maintenance

  • @VeeSeven700
    @VeeSeven700 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's about as I would expect. The French go for slightly more in terms of ground forces. The UK goes slightly more in navy. Geography sorts that out for each country. But overall pretty much the same give or take.

  • @LondonsFinestSon
    @LondonsFinestSon ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Apples and Oranges. Land power vs. Island nation. Which suggests the UK is lacking significantly given the French 'edge' that too. The main difference is that the French actually make things in France. We just muddle for decades and spend way more than we need to, and then another round of privately educated accountants show up in government and pull figures out of their arse and cull whole regiments. Disgusting state of affairs.

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      France doesn't edge the Navy, the 17 frigates for example include Floreals, which are basically an OPV.

    • @LondonsFinestSon
      @LondonsFinestSon ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davidhouseman4328 The UK is an island nation with a decent-sized EEZ and has global interests routed in our dependence on the sea, and can barely deploy naval assets without calling on allies to pick up some slack. Defence implications aside, it’s deeply embarrassing for a nation with such a proud maritime history. Our ‘leaders’ should be ashamed of themselves.

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LondonsFinestSon We are a nation of 65m and can deploy a carrier group across the world. That's something to be proud of not ashamed.

    • @LondonsFinestSon
      @LondonsFinestSon ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@davidhouseman4328 Can we alone though? Could we field and support an independent CBG, if we’re being charitable and calling it such a thing, in a serious conflict with a near peer-level adversary? I love this country, but seriously worry how run down HMAF have become. The fleet, in particular, is a shell of what it should be in such uncertain times.

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@LondonsFinestSon Yes, we can independently deploy a CBG (or CSG as we use).
      But the reality is in a major war, like in QEs recent deployment, we won't be alone. A Russia fight would be in the context of NATO, a China one would be supporting the US.

  • @mrcaboosevg6089
    @mrcaboosevg6089 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The experience Britain and France have is simply unmatched, over the past 100 years both have fought in nearly every major war. That alone gives a massive advantage in war, both are capable of building up very fast if needed so comparing the two is pointless. Britain and France have been allies since WW1 and combined are second only to the USA

  • @MJPP090909
    @MJPP090909 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Realistically the differences reflect the different state's priorities. France a land power does not focus so much on deployability for all of its forces - some are very capable of deploying and are elite but the majority are not, the UK prioritises deployability across the majority of its forces and pays the price in acquiring and maintaining much more capable logistics than France possesses. You only need to look at France's reliance on British large C17 transport aircraft and Chinook helicopters recently to sustain their presence in Mali to see their deficiency in that area.

    • @Keln02
      @Keln02 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      France has the world's largest EEZ (controlled sea territory), so branding it as a land power is perhaps a bit... mmmh... tricky.

    • @user-lp7wo7og4x
      @user-lp7wo7og4x ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@Keln02I'd say it's fair to label France more of a land power. They may have the largest EEZ but would not be able to defend it if it was encroached on without US help

    • @MJPP090909
      @MJPP090909 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Keln02 As I evidenced in my initial comment, they might aspire to be a global power but they lack to logistics to back it up. They want the big army for the bastille day march and therefore cannot afford the ugly logistics capabilities.

    • @MrSpritzmeister
      @MrSpritzmeister ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How does any of what you said have a reflection on “eliteness” of the forces? It’s more like France focuses on significant force deployment in Africa and Middle East whereas the UK is trying to be a mini global force, hence your point about logistics . Both in the end need more resources to be effective in peer conflict, France is better positioned currently to catch up on that front.

    • @leandro9311
      @leandro9311 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Everthing you said is so wrong at so many levels. First of all, the French military specificaly for the Army doctrine is all about air transportability since the end of WW2 as a matter of fact, ther vehicles are almost exclusively wheeled specialy combat vehicles being lighter, in contrast the British Army is mostly tracked with the majority of wheeled vehicles being MRAP´s or utility the Boxer marking a shift in these regard due to a very late modernization effort but thats all. Then, in terms of logistics, both countries use roughly the same number and even type of transport aircraft, the British gain an advantage with 8 C-17´s but again, thats all, France haves more helicopters by a long margin and they are also more modern, longer range and heavier (despite classed as medium) they even have more atack helicopters (im also considering the Army aviation for both nations keep in mind). In terms of Navy, the British have more auxiliary ships and more modern with the French being late but on course to retify these in some degree by 2029, France also haves 3 Mistrals in contrast to 2 British Albion class, the Mistrals are helicopter carriers and the Albions landing platform docks but they actualy do the same and carry roughly the same amount of vehicles and troops, in here the Mistrals gain an advantage for being an helicopter carrier so its more capable of airlifting troops and light vehicles

  • @thefrenchies66
    @thefrenchies66 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am so proud of everyon on this discussion being so cordial and respectful of our servicemen's. We must never forget that behind all the equipment, thousands of men and women watch over our safety and our freedom! As a French living in the US for 30+ years, I feel that the UK and France, being military equals, and being of the same mind, should cooperare further on designing our future defense equipments. A massive saving in R&D and production costs would incur from working more closely together. This would lower our technological reliance on the US and increase the cachet of our defense products on the export market. France and the UK's alliance is something special, and it should never be taken for granted.

  • @rokuth
    @rokuth ปีที่แล้ว +35

    There seems to be less "Money pit" military programs in France as compared to the UK. How much has the MoD spent on the FRES program? How much has the UK spent on both the QE and PoW repairing the various mistakes that have plagued those ships? How much has the UK spent on reworking the Type 42 Destroyers so that they won't overheat in the tropics? How much will they need to spend to build another "Made in the UK because we invented it" MBT? Or is the MoD and the powers in charge thinking that far ahead?
    I'm sure France has had their own issues with their Armed Forces as well, but the UK has seemed to have had a plethora of military programs that took money and gave nothing in return. I wonder how much of that 70B is being spent to pay off those projects and to cover the cost of correcting mistakes? France is apparently getting more "Bang for the Buck" out of their military budget. IMHO only.

    • @uioplkhj
      @uioplkhj ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Less corruption in France and more defense companies. BAE system is a monopoly. All our great defense companies were mothballed into one.

    • @maxt7525
      @maxt7525 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Russia

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      France has its problems too. CDG had it's own teething issues, a French nuclear sub caught fire not too long back. Its just an issue of the complexity of modern kit and the lack of focus an actual war brings.

    • @markcummings6856
      @markcummings6856 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sure seems that way.

    • @RRaymer
      @RRaymer ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Oh god no. You Anglophiles are so naive if you think there is little corruption in the French military industrial complex. We rank the highest after Turkey and Italy in Corruption in Europe. There is a lot of waste, believe me

  • @dutch6390
    @dutch6390 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Très instructif. Merci 🇫🇷 😘 🇬🇧 😉

  • @kevinworrall231
    @kevinworrall231 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    We the UK don't spend our money wisely we waste a lot of money

  • @v.7232
    @v.7232 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I do have to comment regarding the military budget. The UK, even though a lot of equipment is from BSA, imports a fair bit of its kit abroad. While France has a lot produced at home. Making the cost a bit less. Especially France its nuclear arm is all native production and france has a nuclear industry which further reduces costs of refueling its submarines etc.

  • @zetay-loul8824
    @zetay-loul8824 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    French army is ranked 7th best army in the world. the United Kingdom Army, 8th. end of debate.

  • @MTL24
    @MTL24 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    To sum it up the French have; a much larger army, larger airforce and larger navy but spend 22.8% less ($70bn - $54). It is a joke how much we spend and how little we get in return. Also as a former member of HMAF I can assure you we have way less than 227 working tanks and less than 4000 working armoured vehicles.

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The French Navy has more people in it, given automation this can be as much of a sign of being old than better. The RN is larger by tonnage (by a long way with the RFA) and in key asset, SSNs and Carriers.

    • @Retrosicotte
      @Retrosicotte ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Larger but usually only due to older, cheaper kit. Much of their air force is made up of ancient Mirages that wouldn't stand a hope against modern jets, remember.

    • @jimramsey8887
      @jimramsey8887 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well said Hugh. Absolutely right. We are brainwashed in so many areas it is unbelievable. Many support structures including Pilot Training is a disgrace.

    • @jimramsey8887
      @jimramsey8887 ปีที่แล้ว

      Apologies Hugo. I have an eyesight problem.

    • @Flash-sy4ul
      @Flash-sy4ul ปีที่แล้ว

      because uk buy many american weapon like f-35

  • @MrDakkyz
    @MrDakkyz ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Wonder where the UK budget is been spent or pocketed.

    • @saundyuk
      @saundyuk ปีที่แล้ว

      In terms of the military, we spend 2.1% of our GDP, which will be rising to 2.25% very soon. We're one of the few that actually meets the 2% NATO target. France currently doesn't (1.85%).
      Now, if you're talking about undeclared spend - well those are called Black Book projects for a reason. They don't show up on official spending figures.

  • @scottjohnson9300
    @scottjohnson9300 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The fact is we both need each other, and that's not a bad thing. Old times are gone this is the new modern times

  • @evrydayamerican
    @evrydayamerican ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love this channel just wish the videos was longer

  • @Badboybonsai
    @Badboybonsai ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Simple answer. France.

  • @L_L_______
    @L_L_______ ปีที่แล้ว +6

    🇬🇧❤🇫🇷

  • @fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617
    @fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Unfortunately it’s not even close anymore. It’s a national disgrace, embarrassment and shame!

  • @GreatWhite5
    @GreatWhite5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Size does not matter, quality does and for as long as we are both in NATO we are united and a force to be reckoned with.

  • @iDGermain
    @iDGermain ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Little mistake here of vocubulary : France has 1 "porte-avion", UK none, whereas UK has got 2 "porte-aéronefs", FR don't. English has the same word (aircraft carrier) for 2 things that are pretty different in term of military power. "Porte-aéronefs" or aircraft carriers uses more energy and has a range of action limited compared to "porte-avion" but are cheaper. Just a commentary here, no judgement. S.u

    • @Charles-du5yt
      @Charles-du5yt หลายเดือนก่อน

      aircraft carrier and heli carrier thanks no need to explain anything here we all know that

  • @keighlancoe5933
    @keighlancoe5933 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There's no sugar coating it. Our army is tiny. It's a very shiny display in a shop window, but the problem is half the shop is empty. The world is entering extremely tense waters and the decades ahead without doubt will be volatile. It is a matter of national security we get our act together.

    • @obvious-troll
      @obvious-troll ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The UK has always had a small army. The Royal Navy is what gave the UK a massive punch.

    • @tonyz7216
      @tonyz7216 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here in France with maybe just slightly more flesh on the bones.

    • @Deano-Dron81
      @Deano-Dron81 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@obvious-trollWe know. 😂

  • @lorrainemartin371
    @lorrainemartin371 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    France for sure

  • @abuseofmainstreammediacanh5713
    @abuseofmainstreammediacanh5713 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You lost me with your fishy presentation of the Eurofighter masquerading as superior to the Rafale which simply isn't the case ..... while the F35 did not proof a single thing on a battlefield except being outrageously expensive in both purchase and maintenance. ...

  • @dylanworinger6016
    @dylanworinger6016 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    England has 2 aircraft carriers and not aircraft doors, the difference is there, these are helicopter doors re-converted into aircraft carriers.

  • @manassurya2019
    @manassurya2019 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The French military maintains a much higher rate of combat readiness compared to the UK. Their fighter jets and destroyers are good to go at short notice. Britains's eurofighter fleet and type 45 destroyers on the other hand have serious availability problems.

  • @dragondude6984
    @dragondude6984 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's was a nice video and the way he summed it up at the end was great.

  • @shoghunuk7428
    @shoghunuk7428 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I have the upmost respect for the French military having served with them in both Bosnia and Afghanistan. With that out of the way, I would use the term ‘allies’ loosely. France may currently be in NATO but that has always been in a state of flux. Politically, France has tried to scupper NATO in the past and would not hesitate to do it today. They have always been a proponent of an European force, which makes a lot of sense especially as the previous American President highlighted NATO’s biggest weakness - American political will. France and the UK have an understanding and their armed forces may well respect each other and yes, they are allies but the term just sounds so strange to me.

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The UK and France are closer than NATO, Lancaster house has more cooperation than average members.

    • @GonzoTehGreat
      @GonzoTehGreat ปีที่แล้ว +6

      France & UK both have their own large militaries, so they're relatively independent of each other, but they also regularly train and operate together, which makes them closer than most NATO allies.

    • @mathieu722
      @mathieu722 ปีที่แล้ว

      We are closer, but we have to put some limits.
      Never fight too close to the British, you will use us to take the enemy's bullets for you (Dunkirk), and shoot us in the back (Mer el Kebir) while fleeing, taking advantage of this to go full propaganda so that for decades everyone will laugh at our country.
      Some of us will never forget, especially since even today you can't spend 5 minutes on the internet without being ridiculed or reading hurtful things whenever a subject dares to talk about France and the military.

    • @johnjeanb
      @johnjeanb ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not quite the feeling in France. We are very grateful to Nato and to our allies. Fair to say we would all have been invaded if it was not for America BUT would have the US entered the war without Pearl Habour and without Hitler's stupidity to declare war to America. Yes we are strong allies to the US and to Nato but this does relieve us, European countries to have a decent military that is not a sidekick to US's. In France we believe in Europe's own defence forces not in ANY WAY to be against America (rather to be another adult in the room).. America is our ally, no doubt BUT come a Trump president and Nato won't exist in reality.

    • @quentinp45
      @quentinp45 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's true that has a French person I don't like the fact that politically my army is kneels down to NATO so to the US : it's true that UK seems to love it. US has made terrible decision in the past, for instance Irak
      However, even if NATO was braindead as Macron said 2/3 years ago, it has been revitalised more than ever by war in Ukraine. BUT Europe military dependence to US is real problem and weakness : building an Europe military sovereignty it's the key.
      Last but not least, we may have different interests and so different military policy BUT you're an total idiot to say that we're not unlimited ally : our blood blent in the Somme a century ago.

  • @antonystrong2558
    @antonystrong2558 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well balanced and excellent video

  • @CC-ns2ds
    @CC-ns2ds ปีที่แล้ว +9

    You forgot Frances 3 Mistral class LHD they are very powerful and advanced. I believe they actually give France an edge over our navy in terms of being able to project power worldwide.

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 ปีที่แล้ว

      2 Albion + 3 Bay class gives the UK more capacity, though missing the helicopter element.

    • @karenwalter-xr4ls
      @karenwalter-xr4ls ปีที่แล้ว +1

      French should deal with islamic population first before to go on war worldwide. Secure your land first and then you might go elsewhere to cleanup if you like

    • @gabrielhenry9835
      @gabrielhenry9835 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@karenwalter-xr4ls Ok Karen.

    • @CC-ns2ds
      @CC-ns2ds ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidhouseman4328 I know what you are saying but pair the mistrals with the EC tigres and the mistrals advanced well deck as well as it’s purpose built LCACS and it’s multi directional rudder/propeller propulsion plus it’s hospital space. It’s an absolute monster.

    • @selimkoksal3053
      @selimkoksal3053 ปีที่แล้ว

      who cares about advanced warships at the end of the day submarines, long range torpedoes and mine warfare makes the diffirence in a naval conflict

  • @TheFreeman59
    @TheFreeman59 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As you said : "..of course we're allies!". That's the most important thing, the rest is just showing who has the biggest...

  • @iammyriad71
    @iammyriad71 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You missed the type 26s as well.

  • @arnaudpollet-thiollier6054
    @arnaudpollet-thiollier6054 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good conclusion! 👍

  • @UpsilonDelta
    @UpsilonDelta ปีที่แล้ว +3

    🇫🇷🇬🇧 🤝❤ vive notre alliance

  • @Squadlala
    @Squadlala ปีที่แล้ว +2

    there is no comparaison. they are equal on the sea now (we aren't in 1940). France product best canon (says by ukraynian), best jet (rafale jet is the most count but the best army-jet at this moment, better than armericans jet which costing lower). And then french army was on the field in 2010s and still knows what is war. Great Britain doesn't fight from long ago in an open war. French army is preparing himself to a potential high presure war (compare low presure it was in Africa). Money can't taking place of experience in an army (sorry for my english, it's probably bad^^)

  • @misterioness4028
    @misterioness4028 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    🇫🇷🤝🇬🇧

  • @idar1449
    @idar1449 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Small details: the French army has Exocet anti-ship missile (one of them can sink a destroyer) and self-propeled artilery canon CAESAR (6 shoot/minute, very fast to moove before and after shooting).
    Glad to be allied with England.

    • @itano07
      @itano07 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      C'est pas très malin de parler de Exocet.
      Mais tu dois être jeune c'est pour ça, regarde la guerre des Malouines.

    • @idar1449
      @idar1449 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@itano07 Je suis au courant pour les Malouines. Mais je parle de fait: ce sont des équipements encore en possession de l'armée Française. Les argentins en ont certes fait usage contre les Britanniques (ce que je désaprouve) mais ce n'est pas pour cela qu'on ne peut pas en parler.

  • @alexisanto0018
    @alexisanto0018 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Longue vie à l'amitié franco -anglaise ! Long live the Franco-English friendship !

  • @vMaxHeadroom
    @vMaxHeadroom 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Together we have probably the most battle harderned experienced troops as we have been fighting for centuries... Even though there were the best enemies, I am thankful we are now the best of allies andI admire the French immensly..

  • @Youtubechannel-po8cz
    @Youtubechannel-po8cz ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It hardly matters which one is slightly stronger. Britain and France should be United in their defensive objectives as we share a similar past and our people have the same values. We should be a rock solid partnership.

    • @rb026
      @rb026 ปีที่แล้ว

      The pb is that the UK is slowly becoming an US puppet (which sucks) so France won't be keen to have the same military policies like for the nuclear for instance. The brits should be less relying on the US they can do it

  • @DF-ws2xv
    @DF-ws2xv ปีที่แล้ว

    A no nonsense presentation of the stats & facts - no frills, no music, no spin.
    If only those in government could talk to us in the same manner.

  • @auriel8300
    @auriel8300 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's like comparing two bums. Which one has the best cardboard box?

    • @mrsentencename7334
      @mrsentencename7334 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      US, UK and France are probably the three powers with the best power projection capabilities.

  • @harrystones2522
    @harrystones2522 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As an American my POV is that both the French and the British have stronger militaries in their respective geographical regions but not outside, and some Brits would counter me by saying Quality over Quantity and that's fair.
    But if you are overwhelmed by a force like the United States or China or even your former colony India, experience and the number of wars y'all have won in the past do not matter in modern era of the 21st century, India is not that much experienced in wars but the number of Army, Airforce and to some extent their Navy would absolutely overwhelm the UK because also India has two aircraft carriers which means y'all are equal.
    So to some extent quantity does matter and I think as your allies over the pond would say that the UK should increase its military budget to atleast $100 billion and push to become in the top 5 of the most powerful militaries in the world, Folks quantity does matter look at the Russians they're military absolutely sucks and it is just plainly junk but they still maintain either the third or second position in world rankings.

    • @anthonywright6237
      @anthonywright6237 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When all technology has ran its course.. it goes back to the old fashion way. And we know how to war. It's in our blood

    • @mehf649
      @mehf649 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s a great idea but we don’t need to spend that much currently, we aren’t in any active conflict that requires such a large military. And let’s say that we were to go to war with India I am sure we would be able be able to detect a good couple months or years before it actually happens and that’s when you will see massive increase in the size and budget of our military.
      Because the difference between Europe and America is that the US is always ready for a massive world war scenario while Europe will only be ready when it needs to be.

    • @capbrit
      @capbrit 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hmmm not really, as the Royal Navy Astutes would have sunk the Indian navy's two aircraft carriers and probably most of its Navy before it got to the UK, and lets be honest Britain has been outnumbered before...

  • @moimamadou6683
    @moimamadou6683 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle already has an electromagnetic catapult

    • @Noelegamer
      @Noelegamer ปีที่แล้ว

      Non c’est une catapulte à vapeur

  • @philtre
    @philtre ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very interesting video, but what is the aim ? Je suis français et je ne vois pas l'intérêt de comparer nos deux forces. Cela suggère que l'on doit envisager une guerre entre nos deux pays pour savoir "en vrai" lequel serait le plus fort. Nous avons une longue histoire commune, qui commence avec l'invasion se l'Angleterre en 1066 par Guillaume le conquérant, un normand venu de France. Je passe sur les incroyables épisodes de la guerre de 100 ans, de la seconde guerre mondiale, pour arriver à ce que l'on peut faire aujourd'hui, sur la guerre en Ukraine. La vraie question c'est est-ce que nos armées peuvent contribuer à la victoire de l'Ukraine ?

  • @tsangarisjohn
    @tsangarisjohn ปีที่แล้ว +14

    France is much stronger. For one it builds and operates its own equipment. It’s reliance on others is minimized. That’s is the only factor that matters, few nations have this capability.

    • @mitraillette_en_sucre
      @mitraillette_en_sucre ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Unfortunately, we do not manufacture our own rifles anymore

  • @doctorserpiente1991
    @doctorserpiente1991 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    France 73.000.000.000
    + 100.000.000.000 € increase between 2023-2030
    Uk 63.000.000.000
    Deutchsland 44.000.000.000 + 100.000.000.000 € increase between 2024- 2030

  • @alexnisbett4635
    @alexnisbett4635 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The RN will also receive type 26 frigate and new type 83 destroyer as well as the new tempest fighter, which will all be in service by the time the new French carrier is commissioned

    • @henryvagincourt4502
      @henryvagincourt4502 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We will see, the Type 26 yes, the rest, like I said we will see.

    • @historyshorts101
      @historyshorts101 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Jack S Tempest is due 2035. Also, UK is increasing Frigate numbers by 5 with Type 31.

    • @oakpope
      @oakpope ปีที่แล้ว

      @@historyshorts101 "Tempest is due 2035" A military project has never seen delays. Never...

    • @mrcaboosevg6089
      @mrcaboosevg6089 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oakpope It depends on how long they have been working on it, they're not going to tell us the details

  • @kurtsteiner8384
    @kurtsteiner8384 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you talk manpower, uk had 40 years defence cuts.
    French militry is mostly conscripted, except for forign legion.
    Whereas up has lrofessionally trained millitary forces. They are not conscripted.

  • @riztup1841
    @riztup1841 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you have 2 carriers, we have 4. Because we have amphibious ships with helicopters.

    • @Noelegamer
      @Noelegamer ปีที่แล้ว

      ils en ont 8 alors ils ont 6 porte hélicoptère mais pas les hélicos pour les équiper mdr

  • @1A157
    @1A157 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So if both nations armed forces are of similar size, why is the French defence budget less? Where is money being wasted by the British defence budget?

  • @arnaudlauzier2334
    @arnaudlauzier2334 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    not mentionning the 3 aircraft carrier for elicoptere of france is weird

    • @mikelovesbacon
      @mikelovesbacon ปีที่แล้ว

      So is not mentioning the amphibious assault ships and landing craft the UK has

    • @arnaudlauzier2334
      @arnaudlauzier2334 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mikelovesbacon the UK have 0 aircraft carrier for helicopter! They just dont have this kind of ship since they drop the HMS OCEAN! So if you only consider aircraft carrier the uk has 2 and french 1! But if you consider all type of aircraft carrier, the UK still has 2 but the french have 4!

  • @Christopher-k7f
    @Christopher-k7f ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, talking for my generation. I remember Wembley sang the "Marseillaise" few days after à terrorist attack in Paris.
    From my French perspective. Brit's and French military don't compare but add up in battle.
    Only wish the Brit défense strategy could be a little less submissive to US. Their 70B$ would worth more than few US fighters.

  • @thetruthhurts7675
    @thetruthhurts7675 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The total spend on procurement, and research is NOT Covered by the UK military budget. They run as seperate budgets and in total the amount spent on the military last year was £117 Billion making the Uk the forth largest spender on defence. Only the USA, China, and India spend more. We currently spend 5.9% of GDP on defence expenditure, which is £71.4Billion. Defence is the fith largest part of government spending.

    • @paxundpeace9970
      @paxundpeace9970 ปีที่แล้ว

      What a waste

    • @jimramsey8887
      @jimramsey8887 ปีที่แล้ว

      Spending is important but the waste is even more critical. I could give you a long list over the years.

    • @historyshorts101
      @historyshorts101 ปีที่แล้ว

      "£117 Billion"
      If it was £117bn, it is way ahead of India who are $78bn.

    • @quentinp45
      @quentinp45 ปีที่แล้ว

      no western country spends 5.9 of GDP in defence bro

    • @mrcaboosevg6089
      @mrcaboosevg6089 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@quentinp45 I think you should probably read what he said before commenting

  • @apreslavague1557
    @apreslavague1557 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We must stay allies for ever guys, let’s protect us; we’re neighbours 😊

  • @Crissy_the_wonder
    @Crissy_the_wonder ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Maybe Ben should consider how government ministers (including himself) have failed on procurement management. And two aircraft carriers is fine, but not being able to deploy a carrier task group without US help and only once every two years in reality is not good enough. Buying just 3 E-7 Wedgetails is ridiculous. An added UK problem is terrible economic mismanagement by the Tory government with a policy harming UK trade & investment (you know the one, Brexit). Other factors are important, such as having a proper energy security policy which has been a total Tory failure of short term market opportunism against both consumer and national interests

    • @alvanrigby6361
      @alvanrigby6361 ปีที่แล้ว

      Remoaner getting his twopence worth in.

    • @paxundpeace9970
      @paxundpeace9970 ปีที่แล้ว

      They probably don't have the pilots.
      Yes 8 or maybe 10 would have been appropriate. 5 immediately and 5 later

    • @saundyuk
      @saundyuk ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not Defense Ministers who hold the pursestrings. Complain to the Treasury - Ben did well just to get an extra 11 Billion out of them this year (and that basically just keeps us treading water rather than increasing our forces). It's a damn site more than most of his predecessors managed.

  • @AdaL0906
    @AdaL0906 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Anyway, From the First World War, England and France must be taken as a single powerful military. And we have to remember that France and United-Kingdom could have been merged.
    So, I am pretty proud about our powerful military, and I think, we still need to improve and be comparable with Russia or USA.

  • @LimaFoxtrot_98
    @LimaFoxtrot_98 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    UK should focus on RN and RAF almost exclusively

  • @peteylang3401
    @peteylang3401 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The French military got a bad rep from Waterloo onwards, especially their capitulation in WW2. But lets not forget, they armed, trained and effectively gave the USA their independence. Without the French and somewhat the Spanish, The US would have lost their war of independence....badly. We may be age old rivals but as a Brit, I admire the French and consider them true allies in the modern world. Just as much as the US, Canada or Australia. Still hate their Football team though haha

    • @TheIceman567
      @TheIceman567 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bad? The British couldn’t control the Americans from 1775-78 by 1778 France joined after the British defeat at fort Ticonderoga in 1778 at the hands of the Americans which convinced the French to join. But the rest I agree.

    • @LOeuffy
      @LOeuffy ปีที่แล้ว

      And even if we speak about WW2, the Free French Forces and the French Resistance played a big role in the war and fought alongside the Allies.

    • @TheIceman567
      @TheIceman567 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LOeuffy that’s true.

    • @LOeuffy
      @LOeuffy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheIceman567 French History during WWII is always forgotten but it's a very interesting part of WWII, from what causes the defeat in 1940, to the puppet Vichy state, to De Gaulle and Free France, to the French Resistance until the end of the war and the French Army of Liberation.

    • @TheIceman567
      @TheIceman567 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LOeuffy true

  • @johnallen7807
    @johnallen7807 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    You should have looked at support and logistics as well. As Ben Wallace has frequently pointed out our forces have been "hollowed out" to the extent that the Americans no longer consider us a Tier 1 military power. Just one example, our ammunition stocks would last just 2 weeks if used at the rate in Ukraine. You also did not mention France's ICBMs and air launched nuclear weapons, we have just 1 sub on patrol at any time.

    • @36thulsterdiv72
      @36thulsterdiv72 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You only need one sub on patrol.. It's never going to be found. A few years back a British SSBN collided with a French sub as nether knew the other was close by. It just shows how quiet Western subs are compared to Russian or Chinese subs.

    • @johnallen7807
      @johnallen7807 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@36thulsterdiv72 "Eggs in one basket" springs to mind and that 1 vessel only has about 40 warheads.

    • @36thulsterdiv72
      @36thulsterdiv72 ปีที่แล้ว

      @John Allen 40 warheads that would decimate any adversaries. If we launch a nuke, the US and France are launching as well.. That's a no brainer.
      The best use of Trident is that it is never used at all.. that's it's value. No-one can ever wage a peer to peer war with us on our territory, while we have Trident.

    • @johnallen7807
      @johnallen7807 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@36thulsterdiv72 You miss my point, if that submarine is tracked and destroyed we have no alternative. As most commentators agree had Ukraine kept its nuclear weapons Russia would not have invaded.

    • @36thulsterdiv72
      @36thulsterdiv72 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @John Allen Who's tracking it?
      You do realise that the UK SSBN will most likely be shadowed by a friendly SSN until it reaches it's patrol area.
      A 2nd SSBN would be ready to go to sea in no time should a British SSBN not be able to complete it's patrol. That's why we have 4.
      One at sea, one working up for deployment, one in berth and one in for maintenance.
      Would a UK SSBN being sunk lead to an activation of article 5?

  • @chrispigott6913
    @chrispigott6913 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The UK aircraft carriers should have been fitted with the magnetic catapults so that they were not limited to one type of aircraft like the F35Bs.

  • @eljay9253
    @eljay9253 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I doubt the UK can project power like the french can. Imho France is the only other super power able to project power across the world and sustain it with domestic production. Material is just a part of the equation.

    • @willems7454
      @willems7454 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kind of funny that as the french had to ask for help during you many missions in Africa....

    • @mikelovesbacon
      @mikelovesbacon ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So the UK sailed a carrier strike group to the South China Sea. How's that for power projection? Actually there are three countries in the world that can do it: the US, UK, and France. And France can only do it sometimes as it only has one carrier.

    • @mrsentencename7334
      @mrsentencename7334 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      UK, US and France have power projection. The RAF was shooting down Iranian drones over the middle east the other month and bombing Yemen. Not many others can do that on a whim