All Lombards draw from the same single conversion pool when exchanging resources, up to a maximum of 1500 banked in one kind of resource. Building multiple Lombards just drains the pool and completes your conversion faster, but it does not change the rate at which any individual Lombard converts.
That ranged siege for crossbows is crazy. It's like the British's longbow siege shipment but for free + 1 Age earlier! At least there's no fire damage like with the British.
I think they should! :) But I also think they could jump on the opportunity and give the first ever campaign some new features with that DLC! I don't think that's gonna happen tbh...
I was disappointed when Maltese get to upgrade their crossbowmen to imperial variant, but Italian pavisiers that seem so unique, only get veteran upgrade. At least we could have a card like the Brits that could grant guard upgrades to it's archers.
For what i learnt in this video about lombards, is that: 1. You can have 5 2. They are taverns with the investment mechanic 3. You should build all 5 In age I you only need 1 but what i think is that, when you deposit more and more resources in only one lombard it gives you exactly the same trickles but just for more time, and that's not preferable for 2 reasons: 1. If you have 2 lombards with 300 wood in each you get +1.5F/+1C p/s for each of them, rather than just that for just one of them, so you get the double trickle but just with less time 2. In reason 1 we get more resources per second, and this reason is that you would want to invest the least on each lombard, because as the inflation is high, and the percentage they give is the same no matter the time, you could get more resources investing 300 wood in one and 300 wood in other, than investing it twice in just one This is a bit hard to explain in text but i hope everyone got the main idea: *Build 5 lombards and divide all your investment in all 5, if possible, dont invest more than 300 in each one until it ends the previous investment* All this is speculation obviously, i dont know if lombards actually work like that, it's just from the little i could see in this video... EDIT: i think when you have multiple lombards everything you invest is invested in all the ones that you have, so having 5 would invest 1500 i think, but still is better to have 5 anyway
The architect can build anything for free but that takes longer than usual You can build faster by paying the wood cost (which decreases the closer the building is to finishing)
Aoe3 has never been all that historically accurate. The German civ for example has always been a joke with its Holy Roman Empire Flag but it's been around since the beginning. The fact that we are talking about a game here, where it is necessary to sacrifice accuracy for functioning mechanics (you know the thing that makes a game actual fun) should be enough to lower some expectations. Besides, the references the manage to put in are supposed to be fun too (think of Sebastopol Mortar or gatling camels ro filibusters for Baja California). Don't fall into the rabbit hole where you buy into the idea of the possibility of perfect, neutral, apolitical, godlike games. It's a fantasy.
@@schadowizationproductions6205 One thing is not being historically accurate, another is just using the wrong flag, that is my only grudge, this civ is clearly not italy, it is papal state with some reference to other italian states, so it should use that flag, i was expecting a modern italy, or kingdom of sardinia, i didn't got that and that is fine, i will just not play the civ, no big thing, but seeing the tricolor veing used by the papal state, which was the most adverse to unification and the concept of an italian nation is atrocious... I have no problem with having pavise crossbowmen when they were already obsolete by 1560, they focused more on renaissance and that is fair, but the wrong use of the flag is on another level
![Portuguese Land Is Actually Overpowered [AOE3]](/img/n.gif)
All Lombards draw from the same single conversion pool when exchanging resources, up to a maximum of 1500 banked in one kind of resource. Building multiple Lombards just drains the pool and completes your conversion faster, but it does not change the rate at which any individual Lombard converts.
That ranged siege for crossbows is crazy. It's like the British's longbow siege shipment but for free + 1 Age earlier! At least there's no fire damage like with the British.
So excited about the new civ
Malta? Do they have the special ringthrower unit from the campaign?! OMG can‘t wait!!
I think they should! :) But I also think they could jump on the opportunity and give the first ever campaign some new features with that DLC! I don't think that's gonna happen tbh...
They even get a card that equips them with a flamethrower (charged ability)
They are slightly different, in the DLC they are called Fire Throwers I believe!
They're renamed to Fire Throwers apparently, but the icon is definitely the same
OOOOOOMMMMMMMMFFFFFFFFGGGGGGGGGG HABSBURGS SPEAK CROATIANNNNNNNNNNNN HOLY CRAP I NEVER THOUGH ID HEAR MY MOTHER LANGUAGE IN THIS GAMEEEE
Those trading posts and basilicas look magnificent!
I know right!
I was disappointed when Maltese get to upgrade their crossbowmen to imperial variant, but Italian pavisiers that seem so unique, only get veteran upgrade. At least we could have a card like the Brits that could grant guard upgrades to it's archers.
For what i learnt in this video about lombards, is that:
1. You can have 5
2. They are taverns with the investment mechanic
3. You should build all 5
In age I you only need 1 but what i think is that, when you deposit more and more resources in only one lombard it gives you exactly the same trickles but just for more time, and that's not preferable for 2 reasons:
1. If you have 2 lombards with 300 wood in each you get +1.5F/+1C p/s for each of them, rather than just that for just one of them, so you get the double trickle but just with less time
2. In reason 1 we get more resources per second, and this reason is that you would want to invest the least on each lombard, because as the inflation is high, and the percentage they give is the same no matter the time, you could get more resources investing 300 wood in one and 300 wood in other, than investing it twice in just one
This is a bit hard to explain in text but i hope everyone got the main idea:
*Build 5 lombards and divide all your investment in all 5, if possible, dont invest more than 300 in each one until it ends the previous investment*
All this is speculation obviously, i dont know if lombards actually work like that, it's just from the little i could see in this video...
EDIT: i think when you have multiple lombards everything you invest is invested in all the ones that you have, so having 5 would invest 1500 i think, but still is better to have 5 anyway
The architect can build anything for free but that takes longer than usual
You can build faster by paying the wood cost (which decreases the closer the building is to finishing)
Great video bro
American Indians can now colonize Europe!
Sick bro
Those tanky crossbows are nuts
Are you gonna try out malta as well?
Are there New historical wars?
There'd be so much opportunities for exactly that! 🤞🤞🤞
lol widgie jumps straight into a match and plays like its a ranked game
Glad to see you get early access, Widgie. DLC looks awesome, especially Italians. Maltese suck tho.
18:10 why sorry ? ain't walls part of the game as well ?
When will it be open to all Players?
26 May
@@erbicho8208 thanks.
Who are the new natives?
wow
What’s wrong with walls?
why feel this is not good quality DLC just reworked mod fire tower .....
Irish and Ukrainians are next
It is fucking insulting to have the tricolor used to indicate a papal state civ, because this is not italy, this is papal state...
Aoe3 has never been all that historically accurate. The German civ for example has always been a joke with its Holy Roman Empire Flag but it's been around since the beginning. The fact that we are talking about a game here, where it is necessary to sacrifice accuracy for functioning mechanics (you know the thing that makes a game actual fun) should be enough to lower some expectations. Besides, the references the manage to put in are supposed to be fun too (think of Sebastopol Mortar or gatling camels ro filibusters for Baja California).
Don't fall into the rabbit hole where you buy into the idea of the possibility of perfect, neutral, apolitical, godlike games. It's a fantasy.
@@schadowizationproductions6205 One thing is not being historically accurate, another is just using the wrong flag, that is my only grudge, this civ is clearly not italy, it is papal state with some reference to other italian states, so it should use that flag, i was expecting a modern italy, or kingdom of sardinia, i didn't got that and that is fine, i will just not play the civ, no big thing, but seeing the tricolor veing used by the papal state, which was the most adverse to unification and the concept of an italian nation is atrocious... I have no problem with having pavise crossbowmen when they were already obsolete by 1560, they focused more on renaissance and that is fair, but the wrong use of the flag is on another level
@@silverams480 dude chill, I'm Italian and say who cares lol it's a bloody gaaaame
i think thats why they gonna label them "italians" not "italy" like the "germans" are not "germany"
@@PuzzleMessage chissà aggiungeranno altre città stato in AOE 2