Ukraine’s Armor Challenged: Nearly 40 Leopard Tanks Destroyed!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 566

  • @chieftandriver703
    @chieftandriver703 หลายเดือนก่อน +178

    Everything is a ‘game changer’ until the artillery arrives

    • @NoNtsmiiile
      @NoNtsmiiile หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      western propaganda youknow

    • @John2r1
      @John2r1 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@NoNtsmiiile Only for people who don't understand warfare. Also the game changer would be if Ukrainian commanders used the tanks in the way they were designed to be used instead of following old soviet tank doctrine. And even then they have managed to lose less western tanks than Russian tanks have been lost.
      For Russia its that Soviet Tanks are absolute shit tanks when it comes to design and survival of the crew.
      Ukraine's problem is that most of their higher commanders are soviet trained commanders who do not use western doctrine. Which is what western tanks were designed for.

    • @John2r1
      @John2r1 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If they used western tank doctrine with the western tanks and equipment they have been given they would have already gotten through the artillery . But they aren't . The Ukrainians are using the same old Soviet combat doctrine as the Russians are using . But with Western tanks that were designed to function under a totally different doctrine.
      So Russian tank designs from the Soviet Union suck in terms of design and crew survival . Ukrainian tactics suck as bad as the Russians tactics because they are reading the same tactical book.

    • @chieftandriver703
      @chieftandriver703 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @jon21
      Ahhhh, gotcha. So the ‘Soviet doctrine’ is the same as the NATO doctrine? After all all the commanders have been to BATO training units to be trained in NATO tactics. This is a decade old war in which NATO has invested billions and have been training Ukrainians in the tens of thousands
      And whilst the Russian tanks may be sub standard there are lots of them whereas the Ukrainians have lost 25% of their leopards which are pretty unsustainable losses

    • @John2r1
      @John2r1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @chieftandriver703 The tank crews have. The Generals on the other hand have not. And it's the Generals who decide doctrine and strategy.

  • @polarstorm5986
    @polarstorm5986 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    The numbers AREN'T "striking"! The question is the following: What did the Leopards do to the enemy? Were ~40 lost without doing any damage to the enemy? Were they lost but managed to destroy 200 enemy vehicles? Did their crews survive? What is the CONTEXT? Tanks, and the Leopard is no exception to this, arer no wonderweapons or magical devices, in a war there are losses, period. 20% losses in years of war and heavy use (because they are always on the frontlines BECAUSE they are good) are nothin but expected. There is absolutely nothin "special" about this besides that it is mor eon the "impressive" side of things that they are doing so well considering the cicumstances. Besides: NO ONE IN HIS RIGHT MIND said they are a "game changer". This term is so lauglable. NO single system is a game changer. Gosh, this stupid media and influencer term...

    • @AdrianTether
      @AdrianTether 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      most of them didnt even get chance to fire , they where in transit or getting ready for combat

  • @andrewsansom4798
    @andrewsansom4798 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    what you need to understand is a disabled tank is not always a loss, both sides try to recover damaged hardware.
    The problem :
    Damaged leopard tanks (and other western models) need to be sent as far as Poland for repair, while Russia is repairing their tanks right behind the front line.
    the other thing is Russia is pushing forward, so disabled hardware is more likely to be recovered.

    • @ViceCoin
      @ViceCoin หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Fighting in Iran and Taiwan will be the same for the US.

    • @mishabazenov7017
      @mishabazenov7017 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ViceCoin
      Ну конечно от Ирана Египет близко - если вы понимаете о чем я.🤗

    • @tobiasrietveld3819
      @tobiasrietveld3819 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Also the best tanks will be sent into the most dangerous situations.

    • @tamdang8346
      @tamdang8346 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The problem you cant retrieve it when the entire spearhead consists of a few of them unable to cover for each other once one is disabled.... expensive... cumbersome .... small in number.... slow..... all terrible characteristic for a real offensive warfare against real enemies... only media warfare against Middile East third world countries

    • @Clingerman93
      @Clingerman93 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@tamdang8346 oh cry a little harder for fucks sake, I swear some of you people are just terrible

  • @sdavis9444
    @sdavis9444 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Wow 40 Leopards in almost 3 years? Ukraine is DONE!!
    (Russia with their 3000 destroyed Tanks crying in the back)

    • @jamesmorrison4976
      @jamesmorrison4976 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yep, that’s true!

    • @gabitsu-ftw3871
      @gabitsu-ftw3871 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You're delusional. Russia occupied 20% of Ukraine and that's a fact

    • @VictoriaVoltia
      @VictoriaVoltia วันที่ผ่านมา

      Its like praising the wonder weapon Tiger II at WW2.
      "Wow 500 Tiger II in almost 3 years? Germany is DONE!!
      (Soviet with their 83500 destroyed Tanks crying in the back)"

  • @tedcity5861
    @tedcity5861 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Damn it, the Leopards from Canada was supposed to be a LOAN ! We dont want em back in pieces.

    • @МихаилК-л1д
      @МихаилК-л1д หลายเดือนก่อน

      They will return to you in parts only your mercenaries - Nazis and terrorists! And you can forget about tanks!

    • @ayo-v1p
      @ayo-v1p หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I don’t think they were given out as a loan.

    • @mikegaruda4270
      @mikegaruda4270 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This dude thinks Canada is not related with this war, grow up, is OTAN against Russia and North Korea.

    • @exiownage
      @exiownage หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Don’t be gentle it’s a rental 🤣

    • @corychallice7705
      @corychallice7705 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Incorrect

  • @kurangajar-b1g
    @kurangajar-b1g หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    It is invincible against everything, except shovels.

    • @CETNICI_SEVER_1989
      @CETNICI_SEVER_1989 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Leopards and Abrams = 💩

    • @John2r1
      @John2r1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CETNICI_SEVER_1989 Yeah tell that to the Iraqi Army during the Gulf War. Oh wait the US M1 Abrams , German Leopard 1's and British Challenger 1 tanks rolled over the Iraqi's best armored units like they were nothing.
      Also if the Ukrainians were actually using the tactics these western tanks were designed for they wouldn't be losing as many tanks. Oh and how many of the 31 Abrams has Ukraine lost because of their tactics ?
      Answer 11 out of 31. They still have 20 of them. And with the Leopard's lost 13 Leopard 2A6 tanks and they lost 3 Challenger 2's.
      Now how many tanks has Russia lost ?
      Answer....
      T-90's Russia has lost about 100 to 160 of them.
      T-80's Russia has lost around 600 to 900 of them.
      T-72s Russia has lost over 1,200 T-72 tanks in the Russo-Ukraine War.
      So from the numbers we can safely say that Russian tanks are shit. And at the same time we can say that Ukrainian Military leadership's doctrine for the tactical use of tanks are shit tactics of the Soviet Union. Being applied to tanks built with a totally different tactical doctrine in mind.
      Oh and do you know the difference between when a Western tank such as the M1 Abrams or the Leopard 2A6 or the Challenger 2 is knocked out vs when a Russian Tank gets knocked out is ?
      Crew survival. Western tanks get knocked out . The crew generally crawls out of the tanks and retreats to safety.
      Russian Tanks get knocked out the turret explodes off the tank killing the entire crew in the process.
      Tanks are military equipment. They are replaceable. Experienced Tank Crews are not Replaceable. The objective isn't to not get hit ever. But rather to be capable of taking the hit without killing the entire crew. If you are hit. The main objective is to take out the other tank first.

    • @pentasdunia5904
      @pentasdunia5904 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂memang kurang ajar statement mu bo....

    • @EliasSvidran
      @EliasSvidran 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@CETNICI_SEVER_1989 Russian mbts are piece of paper wdy talking about

    • @CETNICI_SEVER_1989
      @CETNICI_SEVER_1989 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@EliasSvidran Go to lgbt pride,that is place for you!

  • @blackfound9664
    @blackfound9664 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Russian bragging about destroying 40 leopard, meanwhile russia already lost over 1200 t72 🤣

    • @lancemillward2462
      @lancemillward2462 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ukraine has lost 700 of its 1000 tanks according to some sources. Russia making huge numbers of replacements.

    • @blackfound9664
      @blackfound9664 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @lancemillward2462 It doesn't matter even if they make 500 tanks a year if all it takes is a drone worth $20k built within a few days to destroy a tank worth 1.2 million.

    • @lancemillward2462
      @lancemillward2462 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@blackfound9664 true, and the same applies to each side.

    • @katyushatman5187
      @katyushatman5187 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@blackfound9664 leopard and abrams cost more than 10 million dollars to make

    • @katyushatman5187
      @katyushatman5187 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      orix and other western "sources" counted ukranian losses on Russian side

  • @Rick2010100
    @Rick2010100 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Unfortunately, many Leopard 2s were wasted by completely incompetent Ukrainian leaders who still operated with the once teached useless Soviet military tactics.
    a) You don't drive an MBT into a minefield, it has to be cleared first.
    b) To protect the MBT from drones, Ukraine received around 50 Gepard tanks. None of these Gepards are deployed on the front lines, they are all just around cities as air defense.
    The Gepard was specially designed to secure the airspace for mobile ground troops, such as MBTs, IFV, etc.
    c) If the Gepards were used as originally intended to protect the Leopards from the danger from the air, there would be no drone problem.

    • @leehotspur9679
      @leehotspur9679 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      The problem was not from the air but land based Kornets etc Pay attention to what the vid explained

    • @Rick2010100
      @Rick2010100 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@leehotspur9679 Nope, they have been all hit by mines or drones. After a tank has lost its tracks on a mine, it naturally becomes an easy target for artillery. Disabling a moving MBT with artillery is like winning the lottery jackpot.

    • @lebedevft
      @lebedevft 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Oh yes, that same stupid Soviet tactic invented by NATO instructors =)))

    • @vaizdas-ir-garsas1978
      @vaizdas-ir-garsas1978 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @Rick2010100 Which Couch Military Academy did you graduate from and where do you pull this "info" from?

    • @VictoriaVoltia
      @VictoriaVoltia วันที่ผ่านมา

      Gepards is basically a tank hull with different turret. It still disabled in the end anyway. It did shoot down a hundred drones, but the next two hundred will get her and any other tank she escort with her. The old soviet warfare of 400 Tiger II tanks vs 83000 Soviet tanks are repeated again today. Germany didnt say much about destroyed tank ratio when their capital occupied and the wall erected, were they?.
      Also, defending capital is much more important with that tiny amount of Gepards shipped. Ukraine assembly rate for Gepard is zero compared to Russian assembly rate of drones. We should start see this war not as a war equipment catwalk, and more as the objective oriented instead. We saying the stuff like a military magazine photo session, while Russian treat their billion dollars war equipment as ammo to spent.
      I remember we laughed at "Cope cage" the Russian used back in 2022. Now that Israel uses it too means that it works and Russian did adapt. They spam everything while keep adapting. This should get the alarm turned on.

  • @bluelithium9808
    @bluelithium9808 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    Rusty shovel break Greman tanks? You dont say.

    • @abdinafac9
      @abdinafac9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Can’t believe 😅

    • @lordemarsh6804
      @lordemarsh6804 หลายเดือนก่อน

      American tanks too😂

    • @flncrs7012
      @flncrs7012 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I dont tink it ever existed a tank or a vehicle that didnt got destoryed when it got into long fights. Juat look how a leopard 4 fucked all that t72 and t90m column

    • @bluelithium9808
      @bluelithium9808 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @flncrs7012 Russia weak, only has broke rusty shovels and washing machine parts to destroy great western tanks.

    • @shlug
      @shlug หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@flncrs7012 look where? 😼

  • @abeonthehill166
    @abeonthehill166 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    Why would the Russian Tank designers want to reverse Engineer a Leopard Tank that is too heavy for the Terrain of Ukraine and Russia, and is so easily blown to pieces by artillery and small drones ?
    I think that Tanks are now obsolete .

    • @OverlordZephyros
      @OverlordZephyros หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Guns are obsolete because missiles exist... its that logic

    • @brokencat2662
      @brokencat2662 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Glad to hear your opinion, where did you get such insights? Are you in the military by any chance? Or just a swamp assed couch expert.

    • @flycatchful
      @flycatchful หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@OverlordZephyros They thought the same thing in Vietnam in aerial combat with Migs. They learned the hard way and put the gun back on the US fighters.

    • @alexgo1034
      @alexgo1034 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Russian engineers already knew what inside before that crap was sent

    • @OverlordZephyros
      @OverlordZephyros หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@flycatchful exactly everything has a place

  • @hikigayahachiman6368
    @hikigayahachiman6368 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    Russia has adopted Ukraine’s drone attack strategy simple but affective

    • @John2r1
      @John2r1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah that's called adapting and the Ukrainians drones are still effective. The US and the western countries have been watching this war the entire time and taking notes. Then building new things to counter the situations that could come of it in future wars.
      Remember the first country to start using drones in war was the US .
      Also note that the only reason Ukrainians generals accepted the drone corps part of their military was the proven effectiveness of the drones during the early part of the war. Russia was a little slow on this . But it's like the old saying "Generals always fight the last war".
      On the positive we voted out the war hawks and voted in the peace through strength President again. So this should be cleared up in a few months.

    • @toliklisiy5868
      @toliklisiy5868 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Russia did not adopt anything from Ukraine, because drones existed back in the USSR
      only drone warfare wasn’t so popular back then.

    • @John2r1
      @John2r1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @toliklisiy5868 Wasn't so popular until the US started using armed drones about 20 or so years ago.
      Ukraine adopted the concept from the US.
      Russia adopted it from them. Because drones weren't really a thing in the Soviet Army. Primarily because Russia was going broke. It was an economic collapse that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. No money means no new equipment.

    • @didierfournier7142
      @didierfournier7142 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@John2r1Ce qui prouve que l'Ukraine est soumise aux États-Unis... Merci pour cette confirmation !

  • @85daniel
    @85daniel หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The Leopards bore the brunt of the failed counter-offensive. Long minefields, well-developed positions and the use of combat helicopters. Losses were to be expected there. But there are still some on the move and they are recording successes. To hear the Ukrainians tell it, the Leopard 2 is their favorite main battle tank

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The only reason Ukraine’s offensive failed is because of the MAGA nut jobs in America held back weapons for seven months. Had nothing to do with Superior Russian tactics. The Ukrainian simply didn’t have short range air defences or fighter aircraft. Nothing to be proud of.

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      As for many European countries. But shares your position

    • @espacesX
      @espacesX หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is more IFV Bradley vs. Russian MBTs than Leopard 2 vs. Russian MBTs.
      I would say the Leopard 2 is own class far above theceussian MBTs while 2 Bradleys are Russian MBT Killers. Wingmen Bradley with TOW focuse the other is smashing the russian MBT out of the Battle.

    • @Leon-bc8hm
      @Leon-bc8hm หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@espacesX Not true.

    • @espacesX
      @espacesX หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Leon-bc8hm what is Not true?

  • @corychallice7705
    @corychallice7705 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    NATO armour is superior to Russian counterparts. Crew survivability is the major difference

    • @valbrend9819
      @valbrend9819 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      True however but with limited supplies? Russian usually have secondary drone after the first impact or finishing it off with artillery. Russia seems to have loads of Old soviet tanks they can replenish quickly but not for Ukrainian

    • @VictoriaVoltia
      @VictoriaVoltia วันที่ผ่านมา

      Not with that low production rate vs their production rate.
      You know that the destroyed ratio in WW2 is 500 tanks vs 83000 tanks? Guess which one have the capital split into two with a wall?
      We weren't playing tank computer games here.

  • @jarrodmartin-k5p
    @jarrodmartin-k5p หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    40 tanks in almost 3 years 😂 seriously Iraq lost 40 tanks an hour in desert storm.

    • @ourshelties7649
      @ourshelties7649 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      That is just one kind of tank and they only have about 120 total. Now count all the other types they've lost, mostly old Soviet tanks.

    • @zoranboskovic7838
      @zoranboskovic7838 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      NATO NACISTI F 16 KAPUT 😂😂😂🚀💥🔥

    • @user-leshiy99rus
      @user-leshiy99rus 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      He compared the full-scale US invasion of the country with outdated weapons and a shitty army, and the protracted war between the Russian Federation and the best warriors in eastern Europe, with the support of the entire NATO.🤦‍♂️

    • @tvcat5847
      @tvcat5847 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-leshiy99rus Украинци всегда были самыми лучшими воинами, это факт. Сюда!!!!

    • @neowuwei7851
      @neowuwei7851 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      US tanks in Iraq were not facing FPV drones, Lancets or more advanced ATGMs.

  • @takoto2610
    @takoto2610 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Come on: even Oryx admits the loss of 52 Leopards (those include Swedish Stridsvagn 122s and Finnish Leopard 2Rs, those are Leopards too). And Oryx always downplays Ukrainian losses and amplify Russian losses.

    • @tvcat5847
      @tvcat5847 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Орикс всегда говорит правду - там всегда есть пруфы. И нету там 52 потерянных леопардов, не ври.

    • @jamesmorrison4976
      @jamesmorrison4976 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So Russian rely suddenly on Chinese golf carts because Oryx exaggerated Russian losses? Keep coping loser!

  • @ulrichbehnke9656
    @ulrichbehnke9656 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    What is the reason?
    Simply war.
    You can not attack an enemy and await to get not hit by artillery, mines, rockets and bombs.
    The Russians has lost 5.000 tanks - so what is here the argument?

    • @jashominhess851
      @jashominhess851 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Russia has lost 1,500 tanks according to the Pentagon. Keep coping

    • @ulrichbehnke9656
      @ulrichbehnke9656 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @ IISS thinktank and ORYX Intelligence estimated 3.000 lost russian tanks - half a year ago. You can presume 500 - 1000 more today.

    • @Leon-bc8hm
      @Leon-bc8hm หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jashominhess851 Still way more than 40 leopards most of them were the oldest L1. So crawl back under that rock you live.

  • @ViceCoin
    @ViceCoin หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    70ton Western tanks get stuck in mud.

    • @ingemarsjoo4542
      @ingemarsjoo4542 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ukraine also have the much lighter Leopard1 (88 pieces delivered), which not get stuck in the mud as easily as the heavier western tanks. The weight of a Leopard1 is about equal to the weight of a T-72. Ukraine has also recieved 170 swedish IFVs, which are SPECIFICALLY constructed to work very well also in deep snow and the swampy moors in northern Sweden.

    • @John2r1
      @John2r1 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      T-72s also get stuck in the mud. It happens to all tanks at some point. Which is why tank crews train in recovery of stuck tanks. It's also why recovery vehicles exist. Just saying. This is the same dumb thing that is said when talking about the T-34 vs the German tanks in WW2. It is utter bs to think that either side is having any better of a time in the current conditions.

    • @ViceCoin
      @ViceCoin หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @ingemarsjoo4542 Leopard1 has obsolete 105mm gun and fire control system. Defenseless against drones, mines, missiles, Kranaspol artillery.

    • @John2r1
      @John2r1 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ViceCoin I am pretty sure they sent the updated Leppard 2A6 for this reason. 120mm is more effective.
      However considering that the Leppard 1 was actually designed to take on T-72's and T-80s and to a lesser extent the T-90 tanks.
      They are at least using them against the tanks they were designed to fight.
      Still think Ukrainian tank warfare doctrine sucks though.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      45 ton tanks get stuck in mud as 0:51 well.

  • @balazshuszak4073
    @balazshuszak4073 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    What's behind this? Hundreds of destroyed Russian tanks. Ukraine fares much better than Israel did in its most intense war 1973. The current tank loss ratio is 1:3,5 meaning 3,5 Russian tanks lost for every Ukraine tank. In Yom Kippur War Israel managed to destroy 2,5 tanks for the loss of 1 tank.

    • @shlug
      @shlug หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😆

    • @pashapasovski5860
      @pashapasovski5860 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Copium Express 😅

  • @ViceCoin
    @ViceCoin หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Also, missiles, artillery, mines, and well trained troops, who exploit weak spots.

    • @existanimal0
      @existanimal0 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia does NOT have well trained troops lmao

  • @MrNedsaabdickerson
    @MrNedsaabdickerson หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Real War Real Loses. That is a fact.

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน

      true words

  • @apis_aculei
    @apis_aculei หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Only 20 % losses within one year heavy fighting ? Complete neclectible. Look at the loss ratio in earlier conflicts up to WW2 ....

    • @Henry_the_Eighth_
      @Henry_the_Eighth_ หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Has it occurred to you that they are sparingly deployed only on specific occasions instead of mass daily deployment? Same goes to Abrams, Challengers etc, they just stay in the rear mostly while Soviet era tanks do the heavy lifting.

    • @RickSanchez__642
      @RickSanchez__642 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Henry_the_Eighth_ guess Ukraine knows how to use the tanks!

  • @PortmanRd
    @PortmanRd หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Leopards couldn't hide their spots.

    • @ViceCoin
      @ViceCoin หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Leopards are an endangered species.😅

    • @alexsnemos
      @alexsnemos หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ViceCoin but your species will soon be extinct

  • @jrtiger34
    @jrtiger34 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Russia a superpower two and a half years later they are still not even remotely close to kyiv

    • @shlug
      @shlug หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is Kiev any closer to taking Crimea back? 😼

    • @jrtiger34
      @jrtiger34 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @shlug Ukraine is not in the same league as Russia is , the point that I'm trying make is this special military operation by Russia is not special anymore

    • @shlug
      @shlug 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @jrtiger34 not special? It's a precursor to WW3. Special isn't even the word to describe it. And Kiev...it only still exists at the mercy of Putin, same as Zelenskiy.

  • @Rob.S859
    @Rob.S859 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Again…
    Where are the Abrams tanks in this conflict?
    My thoughts are the Americans have instructed the Ukrainians not to use them in offensive operations. As they would be as exposed as the Leopard.

    • @samipso
      @samipso หลายเดือนก่อน

      Atleast they are using the leopards rather than sitting on them. They are also having them repaired, so it might be a logistical thing too.

  • @voldemarvaglaots6690
    @voldemarvaglaots6690 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Why Ukraine needed western tanks? Because they lost everything! Now these tanks are gone as well!

    • @ingemarsjoo4542
      @ingemarsjoo4542 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, they are not, stupid, and new ones are arriving all the time. I have noticed that pro-russians speculate wildly out of limited knowledge or no knowledge att all, in spite of there is tons of statistics from both sides about this war.

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its a war so of course there is a chance that you gonna lose tanks. But the question is who loses the most per day Ukraine or Russia

    • @voldemarvaglaots6690
      @voldemarvaglaots6690 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Pz.history , Russian military is still using it's own tanks. Ukraine lost all or almost all tanks. Russians already on safari for Ukrainian "leftovers"!

    • @andyglastonbury6032
      @andyglastonbury6032 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@voldemarvaglaots6690Russia isn’t using its own tanks. It’s using old Soviet tanks some of which are over 70 years old. How are the T80 and T90’s doing 😂🤣😂. As for the T14 so stealthy they are invisible.

    • @HanginInSF
      @HanginInSF หลายเดือนก่อน

      The West can send Ukraine an unlimited number of tanks if it wants

  • @Ears_Fears
    @Ears_Fears หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    40 tanks lost/ disabled but how many dead crews? a loss of a russian tank is normally catastrophic and explosive, western tanks prioritise crew protection, so a loss does not equal a dead crew. At least they have a chance in the leopard

    • @VictoriaVoltia
      @VictoriaVoltia วันที่ผ่านมา

      How about Tiger tanks?
      500 Tiger II versus 83000 soviet tanks. Thats impressive number from WW2.
      I wonder which capital split by a wall?

  • @bertnl530
    @bertnl530 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A damaged tank is not the same as a destroyed or "totall loss" tank.

  • @55Reever
    @55Reever 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    The business of "anti-drone" systems is the future.

  • @finscreenname
    @finscreenname หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Until drones are delt with Tanks are just targets.

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      true, this war is not a tank on tank battle. Modern war I guess

    • @VictoriaVoltia
      @VictoriaVoltia วันที่ผ่านมา

      Its like "until carrier planes are dealt, battleship are just targets"

  • @AdamCook-q9r
    @AdamCook-q9r หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How many Russian tanks have been lost? If Russia is doing so well, how come the 'special military operation' taken so long?

    • @pdarley58
      @pdarley58 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s not an invasion. It was meant to shock Ukraine back negotiations and implement the Minsk agreement.
      They font want to takeover all of Ukraine. Initially they didn’t even want the Donbas!!!
      Do some independent research. It’ll help understand the truth.
      The west has be lying from the beginning over this conflict!!!
      We are actually the bad guys over this!!!

    • @shlug
      @shlug หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If it isn't doing so well, why does Zelenskiy keep on begging for more and more western help? 😏

    • @leehotspur9679
      @leehotspur9679 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@shlug Because they will give it to him ,Ukraine is full of Gas and minerals and was the industrial power house of the old soviet union with high tech and skills Thats why Putin wants it back

    • @Slab6
      @Slab6 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Due to western support

    • @shlug
      @shlug 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @leehotspur9679 you're shitting me, right? 😆 Ukraine was the number two most industrialized republic in the Soviet Union, that is true. But 99% of their factories have been built by the Soviets. After their declaration of independence in '91 they haven't built shit. Before the war, it was one of the most corrupt regions in Europe and now probably the world. Putin doesn't want Ukraine. He's got his own "minerals" and, unlike its failed neighbor, Russia is evolving, building and modernizing. No one wants Ukraine with its problems now. Not the West, not the East. But neither can back down because, image, after all, is everything. And Russia does need to make Ukraine into a chihuahua, because it's been barking too loud for too long, thinking it's a German Shepherd 😼

  • @fredliperson9171
    @fredliperson9171 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yes the tanks are knocked out but the question is did the crew survive....

    • @VictoriaVoltia
      @VictoriaVoltia วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes, the Tiger tanks are knocked out. But the question did the country win WW2?

  • @robertlynn3459
    @robertlynn3459 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No tank can withstand today's modern weaponry, so it doesn't matter whether it's the German tank, the Russian tank, the American tank it doesn't matter.Today's hand held armor or missiles are much stronger.Thanks are the day of being feared like that are over

  • @burgitech8643
    @burgitech8643 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Nato would never use Leopard Tanks like Ukraine. Nato would have total air superiourity and then the Leopard would be highly effective without major losses.
    But after all losing about 40 tanks in more than a year, it should be possible to replace them. Russia has lost thousands within the same period.

  • @saleem956ify
    @saleem956ify หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Where are those game changer abrams where are they...LMAO..

  • @VaucluseVanguard
    @VaucluseVanguard 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No serious military analyst thought the Leopard 2 would be a game changer unless somewhere in the order of 1,500 were provided, combined with sufficient IFVs, artillery and air assets. This has never been done. No modern combat system works alone, they are a “system of systems”.

  • @ElDarude
    @ElDarude หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Theyre wasnt used in combined armed forces and are easy prey to drones.
    Theyre not build against drone fights.

  • @timshelby2324
    @timshelby2324 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The era of the tank might be coming to the end ?

  • @Harbinger343
    @Harbinger343 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    67,429 tanks and self-propelled guns were destroyed in 5-years during WW2. Nobody thought they were “obsolete” and kept rolling them off the assembly line. Nothing is invincible, and everything has its place in combined arms warfare.

  • @mobi7243
    @mobi7243 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Leopards do not have ERA - that is just an ukro retrofit.

  • @kcthba6408
    @kcthba6408 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Nobody has ever claimed western tanks to be invincible. But compared to Russian scrap heaps they are superior....

    • @ayo-v1p
      @ayo-v1p หลายเดือนก่อน

      Source : US beat Vietnam in war

    • @davemccrillis1470
      @davemccrillis1470 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If they can both be destroyed with a $500 drone I really don’t see how that matters unless you’re talking about costs in which there’s no comparison which costs much more.

  • @AndreasJoetze
    @AndreasJoetze หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Alles wird doppelt und dreifach gezeigt!!!🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

  • @spacegoat8889
    @spacegoat8889 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Losses are inevitable

  • @user-propositionjoe
    @user-propositionjoe หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    no way in a war tanks get destroyed!

  • @bebelove2022
    @bebelove2022 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Artillery and drones still rain supreme

  • @jeffreyraia
    @jeffreyraia หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think that super heavy tanks like the Leopard are quickly becoming obsolete on the new battlefield. You have inexpensive drones and artillery taking out million dollar plus tanks with ease. I foresee a move towards smaller and lighter tanks. Tanks that are faster, cheaper, and harder to hit dominating the battlefield.

  • @JürgenHofmann-z1k
    @JürgenHofmann-z1k 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Please answer one question: How many of the handful of Abrams have survived till now?

  • @veljkoventola2097
    @veljkoventola2097 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There is no defence against "Kornet M" projectile....🧐

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now a days its tank vs drone. Not really tank vs tank even though both tanks can kill each other. Why use a 2kk tank when you can kill it with a 50k drone

  • @ShipWreck68
    @ShipWreck68 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is what happens when tanks don't have air superiority. Basic warfare 101. Yet all the idiots keep throwing money at it.

  • @kennethwilson8633
    @kennethwilson8633 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Not very many tanks destroyed compared to what Russia has lost…we stand with Ukraine.

    • @fred4687
      @fred4687 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No we don't

  • @securion100
    @securion100 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    40 Leopard tanks lost after years of war is a "heavy blow" huh? 🤣

    • @jnrifat
      @jnrifat หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      its 40 because that's all they've sent to actual battlefield instead of using as a model to show on TV

    • @СергейАзрапкин-э4ь
      @СергейАзрапкин-э4ь หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Well, yes, it is difficult. If the Russians destroyed almost all the tanks that participated in the battle🤷🏻‍♂️ This can be judged by the regular new deliveries of new equipment to Ukraine. Why do they need another 200 Bradleys if the old ones were so good?! And why do they need Polish Crabs and American Paladins if the old ones are so good?! This means the old ones are no longer there, either they are out of order, or they have been destroyed or captured. And if we assume that the old ones were not destroyed and new ones are being delivered to Ukraine, then why are there no successes?! Seriously, not a single success with such powerful equipment, not a single one... Where is the "complete superiority of NATO strategy and its equipment". Show me your finger on the map. A tank is not a machine for protecting the crew, it is a machine for "breaking through the defense". If you want to save the crew as much as possible, then put it in a bunker. What's the point of a tank if they abandon it and run away, it didn't fulfill its purpose, and because of all the electronics and heating up the ass, these tanks are expensive and only a couple hundred of them were produced🤷🏻‍♂️ Why are they needed?!

    • @СергейАзрапкин-э4ь
      @СергейАзрапкин-э4ь หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Okay guys, we all know that the worst tank is the Challenger 2🤫 Have you all seen the video where after a drone hit the CHALLENGER it exploded like a powder keg🤷🏻‍♂️ There are literally bags of gunpowder inside the tank🫠 Their old school turned out to be too old😂

    • @jamesgarner327
      @jamesgarner327 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Out of a 120, yes.

    • @corn7822
      @corn7822 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@СергейАзрапкин-э4ьthey’ve only taken out one challenger 16! How many Russian T tanks have lost their heads? There simply isn’t enough evidence out there to show how good the challenger is or isn’t at the moment. But it seems to surviving well so far

  • @peternicholson83
    @peternicholson83 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Silly to think that they wouldn't lose any tanks, but it's nothing new with the leopard any way

  • @josephdelp87
    @josephdelp87 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    If the leopard was so bad, why would Russia want to re-engineer one. Hate stupid stories.

  • @kaidi223
    @kaidi223 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is harder and harder for Tanks on both side with Drones. One drone targets the back engine or track the tanks is done crew might as well abandon or becomes a sitting duck.

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน

      yep a 10k drone can take out a 1,2KK tank

  • @LordOfChaos.x
    @LordOfChaos.x 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    a tank can only stop so much, this is not ww2 where armor can be invincible

  • @lordemarsh6804
    @lordemarsh6804 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Means modern war is different from previous one.... Even the abrams was unchallenged until it faced a modern war in ukraine

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russians are also better trained then Taliban

  • @Bird_McBride
    @Bird_McBride หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I can recall someone saying, the plucked duck got stuck in the muck.

  • @vpsr-014
    @vpsr-014 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Think about people on both sides who die in the tank. The most horrible death is "alive while burning" and unable to escape due to a jammed door or paralyzed due to injuries.

    • @НЕТУРОДАМ
      @НЕТУРОДАМ หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Расскажите эту истину руководству NATO & USA...

    • @existanimal0
      @existanimal0 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@НЕТУРОДАМ Mf russia literally kills their own, I have no idea what you're blaming them for

    • @ingemarsjoo4542
      @ingemarsjoo4542 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@НЕТУРОДАМ Tell this to mister Putin...

    • @ayo-v1p
      @ayo-v1p หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@existanimal0
      Russia kills their own While the US and NATO is killing Ukraine

    • @НЕТУРОДАМ
      @НЕТУРОДАМ 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      А какое отношение имеет господин Путин к расширению NATO, к лживым европейским политикам, которые никогда не соблюдали договорённости?

  • @steffenhanf6647
    @steffenhanf6647 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    40 Leoparden vernichtet..? Ich glaube nicht..!

  • @henkvandervossen6616
    @henkvandervossen6616 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It might even be true. It still means their losses are relatively much less than russian tanklosses. And it does not differentiate between L1 and L2 losses

  • @espacesX
    @espacesX หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Leopard 2A6 gone....Leopard 2A8 will be sourced, then.
    The APS of the 2A8 incl. Anti-Drone has well.

  • @kristelvidhi5038
    @kristelvidhi5038 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just like battleships, tanks also became virtually useless in the face of anti-tank weapons specificaly designed to take them out.

  • @steveb890
    @steveb890 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Nearly 40 destroyed ? .... and yet Russia has lost almost 70 brand new T-90M`s , I think I would be more concerned about that than second hand 30 year old armour like the Leopards .

    • @ivopopov7487
      @ivopopov7487 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you for real???
      Stop watching tv

    • @steveb890
      @steveb890 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ivopopov7487 ...my mistake , its 117 listed on Oryx ! 🤣

    • @gianzua5727
      @gianzua5727 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats why Germany only have less that 200 in stock....

  • @buntik1687
    @buntik1687 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just like how F16s were going to force all Russian soldiers to surrender!
    😹

  • @324Ben
    @324Ben หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    And how many turret launchers have Russia lost just this month alone?

  • @billcarpenter5271
    @billcarpenter5271 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Miltary TV !

  • @stupendas101
    @stupendas101 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    did you see the cages that supposedly cost $20,000 ??? they look like something that any welder can put together quickly for under $500 but since the US taxpayer is paying for them, they cost $20,000 with $19,500 going to some thugs for each of these cages. I hope teh first thing Trump does is order an investigation to account for which pockets received the $200 Billion

  • @roderickjoconnor6064
    @roderickjoconnor6064 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    These tanks were designed to fight in western Europe paved roads and air superiority against sovit armor not in eastern Ukraine the face of war has changed warfare changed anti tank missiles and drones plus heavy artillery still a good tank

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pretty sure around 50-60% of tanks are killed by drones now a days

    • @roderickjoconnor6064
      @roderickjoconnor6064 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When I was in the army in the 1990s warfare has changed thanks to

  • @jameslovelace8958
    @jameslovelace8958 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They don’t know how to properly use these advanced tanks. Tanks are not meant to be sent out alone. Send out a platoon so they can cover each other. Stop using Russian tactics.

    • @vitaliy7417
      @vitaliy7417 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Просто у них нет выхода крупную колонну техники быстро обнаружат спутники или дроны и уничтожается массированным артиллерийским огнем а русских есть преимущество они стали обвешивать свои танки коробками из металлической сетки

    • @ayo-v1p
      @ayo-v1p หลายเดือนก่อน

      A platoon of what…?? You think this is Iraq or Afghanistan. A platoon covering a tank would be wiped out at one go with artillery. Better to lose one unit than lose 10 units in a single strike

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน

      You do a lot of strange things when you're stressed or desperate.

  • @eymeeraosaka2954
    @eymeeraosaka2954 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    20% lost is not significant.....Ukraine still has 80%. After 3 years of conflict this can make a big difference...

  • @bigtony4829
    @bigtony4829 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What about the British Challengers I fought they were the game changers
    Nothings been heard of them since they arrived

  • @rigel1176
    @rigel1176 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The right tool for the right "Craftsmen " !
    The use of a high developed Tank in the Hand of a "farmers"
    Driving through the open "prairie" for a "picknick " ?????
    No strategy no support no nothing ... just trying to "bang" around ( same like the Selfpropelled howitzer 2000 )
    On the other side .... drones ,- self finding high tech units ,- where a other "farmer" just have to pull a trigger ,- or play like on playstations !
    For high quality equipment ... it needs high quality ( trained) soldiers !
    Otherwise they can drive directly to the scrap dealer !!!!!!

  • @jannyboe9365
    @jannyboe9365 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The Ukrainian losses are minimal compared to the Russian losses. But its a war. Material gets lost because its being used in combat. Another point is that the tanks supplied to Ukraine are far too few. Also the Leopard 1 has a weaker armour so they have to be used more cautious.

  • @charmknight7171
    @charmknight7171 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i remember zelensky said give me leopard i will win int his war

  • @anthonynicholich9654
    @anthonynicholich9654 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    american junk abrams are already destroyed gone so now German armor is getting destroyed!! how long does it take to Learn and How Stupid Does It get?

  • @edrandell424
    @edrandell424 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Uhmmm.. what ERA is on the Leopards? None as far as I know. Thye make use of composite and spaced armour more so than ERA.

  • @jonnyhjalmarsson9057
    @jonnyhjalmarsson9057 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    it is quite obvious that you are losing a number of tanks, according to Ukrainian sources, they are using these tanks in a different tactical way.

  • @perbremer9942
    @perbremer9942 หลายเดือนก่อน

    just a 5358 $ Bonus to get in a fight with a Leopard ? is he still alive today ? 😂

  • @ThaddäusTentakel-v2n
    @ThaddäusTentakel-v2n หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:24 that's a single Leopard 2 in that picture. What are your sources for the 40 Leopard 2 claims apart from Russian state media (Sputnik)?

    • @alexsnemos
      @alexsnemos หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is a Russian troll - in case that's not yet obvious

  • @AntonioCabralNumberOne
    @AntonioCabralNumberOne หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Stop undervaluating the russian's worth. They are smarter than you think and find simpler and cheaper solutions to complex western's complex and expensive ones.
    It makes me remember that story about the millions the americans spent on pens that could write in Space, while the russians used pencils to do the same thing? Do not count on them not being able to reverse engineer the Leopard's technology, or we'll be surprised once again!

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน

      I partially disagree with your statement. Even if you have an item and can analyze that item, doesn't necessarily make it possible to copy it.

    • @lebedevft
      @lebedevft 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Pz.history It's not about copying, but about countermeasures

  • @salehwahib3749
    @salehwahib3749 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Still Leopard 1s and 2s are very much lethal in the battle fields.

  • @kriegshammer2161
    @kriegshammer2161 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Chance to survive one battle in a Leopard 2, maybe 60-70% .Chance to survive 10 battles maybe 10-20% .Its a very very good tank,from a one of the best Panzer industry nation,but cant do wonder.

  • @timuraydogan5067
    @timuraydogan5067 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    IT IS THE MAN NOT THE TANK !!!!!

  • @1957charlyheinz
    @1957charlyheinz 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Kopfgeld für einen Leopard Panzer für den Soldaten der ihn abschießt. Der Schrottwert ist höher als das Kopfgeld.

  • @oditeomnes
    @oditeomnes หลายเดือนก่อน

    Exactly, Oryx only records visual verified losses. So it may have recorded the same tank 3 or 4 times with the uncertainty of which side owned this tank (including changing ownership after recovery), how many times it was recovered and how many time wrecks were partially salvaged. On other hand Oryx will not tell you that a tank is out of commission because of a worn out barrel (although that is more of a howitzer issue).

    • @useryggfdcc
      @useryggfdcc หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Cope boy cope.

    • @RaymondCollishaw-i1e
      @RaymondCollishaw-i1e หลายเดือนก่อน

      so according to your logic russian losses would also be much lower then as well

    • @oditeomnes
      @oditeomnes หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RaymondCollishaw-i1e Depends on what the video evidence is. Flying turrets and crashed jets and helicopters are obvious losses. Any video with disabled vehicles is just that: disabled vehicles. Also both sides have specialized recovery teams and workshops right behind front lines. Western tanks have the weakness of being harder to repair for local frontline forces, but they are getting recovered just like all other disabled vehicles.

    • @RaymondCollishaw-i1e
      @RaymondCollishaw-i1e หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@oditeomnes like I said. if your theory about oryx counting ukrainian leopard 2s 3 or 4 times was true that would also apply to russian tanks. and russia has the ability to repair or build more tanks then any other country in the world. so if anything your theory about the same tanks getting counted multiple times would apply more to russian tanks then ukrainian, seeing as there ability to repair them is way higher. and another reason your theory doesn't really make sense is. leopard 2s are pretty rare tanks, so most of the one that were destroyed or damaged have multiple photos taken of them. making it easier to tell how much damaged was done. russian tanks often have a single far away photo taken of them. making it if anything more likely that russian tanks are being counted multiple time. if your theory were true that is lol

    • @oditeomnes
      @oditeomnes หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RaymondCollishaw-i1e I do not disagree, both sides use it to heavily inflate enemy casualties claim. That is why I think of Oryx as unreliable intelligence source.

  • @Mystalo
    @Mystalo หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Always nice to watch your videos and that everyday. You're probably the only english channel available that also shows the side of russians. I hope youtube wont ghost this channel like they always do thats against the west

  • @Zoberist
    @Zoberist 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is misleading because Ukraine has no Leopord 2A6

  • @kno6ndg7
    @kno6ndg7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Why so intence music? Could use something more cheerful, in the end you are talking about good things.

  • @peterhartwig2945
    @peterhartwig2945 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    … hat Ukraine überhaupt 40 Leopard erhalten… 190… auf keinen Fall

  • @freddyabrahams3957
    @freddyabrahams3957 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Rusian Airforce might be the key to Ukraine lost of their Leopard tank, but whats make Rusian more masive lost its tank was a combination of drones and HIMARS....

  • @ElliottFreehart-l9v
    @ElliottFreehart-l9v 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is a war and tanks are lost or damaged and we know Ukraine only have so many Leopard 2A4 and 2A6, but the number of tank loses from the Russians are crazy. I blame the media for hype on leopard 2 are game changers, what's different about western tanks and Russian T tanks ? Western tanks survivability is high for the crew because Ukraine can get another tank but a tank crew lose is big and Russian T tanks survivability for its crews are low

  • @metroman8185
    @metroman8185 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Russian are kicking AZZ!!

  • @berndseufert4895
    @berndseufert4895 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    40 leopard Tanks and thousands of russian Tanks.

  • @commosection
    @commosection 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Tactics and crew training is key to any Armies win and loses. Problem is Ukraine is in the middle of a war with limited man power and training. For example during Nato FTX competitions during the Cold War there were times when the US armor won the competition and there were times German Armor won. Bottom line it all depends on the individual crews and there quick adjustments on tactics to meet the goal

  • @kmrtnsn
    @kmrtnsn 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Oh my, another over-rated German tank. Times change, German tank fragility does not.

  • @DeDeimos1
    @DeDeimos1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The weapons systems are not everything, what is important is their number, the training of the crew and their morale. The headline 'Gamechanger' was only partly aimed at the Ukrainian military, it was also intended to gather the people in the West behind the warmongers in parliament and to conceal the failure of all attempts, whether the refusal of diplomacy or the huge amounts of money and weapons that were spent to no avail. It is a 'smoke grenade' to distract the population from who is really getting rich from the billions. Well, to a small extent these were and are corrupt Ukrainian politicians and military officers, most of the money already remains in the sticky hands of politicians in the West, or increases the profits of the MIC.

    • @Pz.history
      @Pz.history หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I like your idea. Nice to see others who don't just see black and white on things

  • @CETNICI_SEVER_1989
    @CETNICI_SEVER_1989 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Leopards and Abrams = 💩

    • @War__robots
      @War__robots หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      -120 t90 tanks russia lost

    • @CETNICI_SEVER_1989
      @CETNICI_SEVER_1989 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@War__robots 40 Abrams, 60 Leopards and 10 Challengers Lost... 🇷🇺👊

    • @War__robots
      @War__robots หลายเดือนก่อน

      @CETNICI_SEVER_1989 most alligator helis gone?

    • @War__robots
      @War__robots หลายเดือนก่อน

      @CETNICI_SEVER_1989 plus ukraine didnt even get 31 abrams

    • @CETNICI_SEVER_1989
      @CETNICI_SEVER_1989 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@War__robots They got 45 Abrams, 15 from the first time and 30 from the second time! Only 5 of them remained, all the others were destroyed!

  • @clacton17
    @clacton17 หลายเดือนก่อน

    40 compared to thousands?

  • @Nicolas-v2w
    @Nicolas-v2w หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bonjour , merci beaucoup .

  • @Ruslan99677
    @Ruslan99677 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Когла горит леопард-это украинский леопард .когьа леопард подбил российских танк-это сверхмощный,могучий,Непобедимый германский танк

  • @Shokonsha
    @Shokonsha 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    And where are your "10 Abrahams M1" you sendet to Ukraine?