Kirchhoff's Laws (old version) - A-level Physics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 184

  • @mrpages6384
    @mrpages6384 2 ปีที่แล้ว +204

    How the hell is a 7 minute video more informative than 4 days of studying?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      😏

    • @beastdultragaming
      @beastdultragaming ปีที่แล้ว +6

      This is the actual truth

    • @muhibulsami3401
      @muhibulsami3401 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      IKR

    • @blablah3167
      @blablah3167 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly asking the same to myself, 7mins over 2hrs of lecture, short, informative concise: thank you!

    • @MorabeFlauwtantie
      @MorabeFlauwtantie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good question.

  • @reemismail777
    @reemismail777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    .You have explained it very well by covering all from simple to complex on electricity. This video was so helpful to turn my negative idea that electricity is difficult to positive.THANKS A LOT SIR.

  • @honeycog9328
    @honeycog9328 4 ปีที่แล้ว +241

    Actually I watched your first video on Kirchhoff (I refuse to pronounce it ‘keerkoff’) and it taught me a lot more than the multiple lessons at school. This video was great too though!

    • @ismailm7883
      @ismailm7883 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      If that aint fax

    • @teinili
      @teinili 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Why would you pronounce it Keerkoff anyway ? :D He was german so it’s more like kirshoff or keershoff depending on your dialect.

    • @namename3130
      @namename3130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@teinili ch is a harch c in german, sch is sh

  • @cowbelly1540
    @cowbelly1540 4 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    sometimes i think why do i go into my a level lessons when i have this guy? im deaddd. But thank you so much, electricity is (was) so hard for me and my teacher didnt explain it well at all but now I can answer questions well and get full marks! Tyyyyy

    • @Drifterz
      @Drifterz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I feel your pain, honestly. So much better explained than in class

    • @beastdultragaming
      @beastdultragaming ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I actually always think the same thing!! I learn way more with him! Pls come to The Latymer School in North London and be my teacher😢😂. Mine is awful compared to you…

  • @vincentroyce6666
    @vincentroyce6666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    With a whole bunch of videos about kirchoff rules, the only video i understood to the deep. Thanks a lot

  • @angelo6082
    @angelo6082 4 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Much better explanation than before, thank you.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      The number of dislikes disagrees! 😥

    • @lfcforever
      @lfcforever 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ScienceShorts 79 haters behind 79 failed attempts to make better video on this topic.

    • @mehiamawesome0609
      @mehiamawesome0609 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ScienceShorts what do you mean, this video is perfect it literally has no dislikes, I can't see any

  • @beastdultragaming
    @beastdultragaming ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Your videos are such a great refresher - they remind of what I’ve learnt and then teach me extra details that my teacher forgets

  • @luamyohannes8456
    @luamyohannes8456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This was so easy to understand. Thank you so much!

  • @also_zilcom
    @also_zilcom หลายเดือนก่อน

    Noo way dude, have my AS physics, Maths and Mechanicas, more or less ready for math and mech, physics is 0, you rlly pulling it up, appreciate you dawg, DO NOT stop making content ✌🏼♥️

  • @usayededu614
    @usayededu614 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am going to give my CIE exam tomorrow pray all goes well.

  • @Lexyvil
    @Lexyvil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:53 that is so relatable. I'm always stuck on every circuit when it comes to solving them :(
    I'm doing this course where we're learning Op-Amps which seems even harder.
    Thanks for the tutorial! I wish most professors I had and videos I found online were teaching the way you do! It's the right amount of detail with the right pacing I was looking for.

  • @clement_jacob
    @clement_jacob 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    from around 6:35 your statement is wrong , pd across that resistor would actually increase, still good video none the less

  • @gishaninethmini8424
    @gishaninethmini8424 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks a lot. I just wanted to remember what I learned for A/L, right before attend to the hardware lab session. It's so informative for 7 mins. Worth It!!🥰😇

  • @bobbyjeffsupremelordofcraz3532
    @bobbyjeffsupremelordofcraz3532 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This explanation has defnitely saved me one hell of a headache.

  • @jasmeetbasra6201
    @jasmeetbasra6201 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So informative and very helpful especially for mocks tomorrow

  • @Haunted.01
    @Haunted.01 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    my teacher took 80 mins, this dude here 7min.

  • @chloetang6694
    @chloetang6694 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    For Kirchoff's second law, what is a pd drop?

    • @ReddoX30
      @ReddoX30 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Potential drop or voltage drop. From my understanding, it's the voltage that gets used by the passive elements from the voltage source.

  • @ZaidAkasha
    @ZaidAkasha 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much you made this way simpler than my physics teacher tried to

  • @jonathana9236
    @jonathana9236 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    where can I see the calculation example where you add the extra 10 ohm resistor on the left side?
    I have a problem similar to that so I'd like to know how the calculation look like and how to get the power of both batteries.

  • @aqeelharoon251
    @aqeelharoon251 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I understood the theory very well and the example also gave me a better understanding. can we have another video with more of these examples please.

  • @Sajithachu814
    @Sajithachu814 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's titaly insane, this video is very useful to me. Thankyou🎉❤😊

  • @tufty1370
    @tufty1370 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    How many Sharpies do you have?!?!

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Like 20 different colours. £10 on ebay. Bargain.

    • @az71003
      @az71003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ScienceShorts i can smell the sharpies

  • @kittyissu
    @kittyissu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What if we didn`t have the 10 ohm resistor? In one loop it would look like the voltage across the 30 ohm resistor is 10 V and in the other loop it would look like the voltage across the 30 ohm resistor is 12 V

  • @Demi305
    @Demi305 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We can't thank you enough for all your help! Liked and Subscribed!

  • @Shreddies31
    @Shreddies31 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello, thank you! Also could you please explain why it doesn't work at 6:32?

  • @heroben1079
    @heroben1079 ปีที่แล้ว

    You've explained better than all my teachers!

  • @DapaChrons
    @DapaChrons 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'm still learning, but is it possible to say that the the capacitor and the resistor (both 10V) are also 10V, because for capacitors in parallel or resistors in parallel, the voltage stays the same? Or is that something we could not assume?

    • @libaanomer1812
      @libaanomer1812 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      damn 3 years and still no response? my fault man wish i knew the answer to help u

    • @DapaChrons
      @DapaChrons 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@libaanomer1812all good! I still don’t know 😂

  • @margaretmarh
    @margaretmarh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much .I'm preparing for end of term tests and my as in exam in January next year .
    I'm glad I came across your channel

  • @jugganot101
    @jugganot101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have a question: isn't it true that E (EMF) is equal to the voltage drop from loads outside the battery plus the voltage lost within the battery itself? How is it then that the EMF is equal to the p.d across just the outer loads in the circuit?

    • @alexukrasin8425
      @alexukrasin8425 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      there is an assumption that internal resistance is negligible.

    • @amadif1793
      @amadif1793 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have the exact same question

  • @The_Green_Man_OAP
    @The_Green_Man_OAP 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    7:05 At the end with the 3rd resistor I get this with a circuit simulator:
    V1= 571.43mV, V2= -9.43V, V3= -2.57V
    The original values were:
    V2= -10V , V3= -2V
    I was able to figure out the original values, but I am flummoxed at the moment with problem including the 3rd resistor...
    Here's my solution for the original problem:
    5:26
    /---------V₂-------------\
    i₁ -/- i₂ \
    ___→______a__←__▭________ ....\
    |--Vᐩ₁₀ | \ R₂ | \
    ⨪±10v i₃↓ -\- | ----\-Vᐩ₁₂
    |--V⁻₁₀ R₃ [] V₃=Vb-Va ⨪±12v
    | | -/- | -----V⁻₁₂
    |__←i'₁ ___b/______________/
    Vb=V⁻₁₂ - V⁻₁₀
    Have:
    i₁=i₃-i₂ (or later at 6:08 , i₁=V₁/R₁ with R₁=10Ω)
    i₂=V₂/R₂ with R₂=10Ω
    i₃=V₃/R₃ with R₃=30Ω
    Also:
    10v+ (V⁻₁₀ - Vb) + (Vb - Va) + (Va - Vᐩ₁₀)=0
    V₃=Vb - Va
    Must have i'₁=i₁ as 10v battery must have charge conserved, with incoming=outgoing.
    This means the wire voltage from Vᐩ₁₀ to point "a" is the same as from as "b" to V⁻₁₀,
    Therefore: (V⁻₁₀ - Vb) + (Va - Vᐩ₁₀)=0.
    => -10v = Vb - Va = V₃
    Similarly,
    12v+(V⁻₁₂ - Vb) + (Vb - Va) + (Va - Vᐩ₁₂)=0
    But here:
    Va - Vᐩ₁₂=V₂=V⁻₂-Vᐩ₂, V₃=Vb - Va= -10v
    Also, any bare wire has zero resistance & the potential is the same on either end, so V⁻₁₂=Vb.
    Therefore, this is:
    12v+ 0v -10v+V₂=0
    => -2v=V₂

  • @joebrooks1994
    @joebrooks1994 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Another great video, please keep up the good work for the sake of me and my friends' a levels

  • @sparkyjackson7025
    @sparkyjackson7025 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Always appreciated and great video! Could you manage to do a video on Viscosity (AS) if you can manage? Thanks a million!

  • @shayanali7672
    @shayanali7672 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Much more helpful than the previous video. Thanks a lot ♥️

  • @exceptionallydistinctivedi481
    @exceptionallydistinctivedi481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does the direction of the loop matter??

  • @fbdjwjflac
    @fbdjwjflac 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    6:48 Why can't you split the 10V emf 3:1?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because it's not the only emf involved!

  • @billy-cg1qq
    @billy-cg1qq 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dude!! Now I want the solution to when you added a third resistance T_T I found the voltage drop on the new resistance you added zero T_T Why? What did I do wrong? Or am I right?

  • @mattiapresti7295
    @mattiapresti7295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do the word "Volt" take an "s" in english to describe its plural? On my every school book I always read that if a measurement unit is called after a scientist, its name doesn't change between singular and plural.
    1 meter and 20 meters exist because isn't existed a mr. Meter, but is an error saying 20 Watts, because Watt is the surname of the inventor of the steam engine. Volt comes from Volta, if a reader doesn't know, and Ampere its trivial. I'm curious because I always read a thing that is never respected by english native speakers acadamics

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting point. Yes, you're probably right, but it's something that is widely accepted.

  • @sakuranooka
    @sakuranooka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What is the "emf"? And what is a "p.d. drop"?

    • @waynewoolfe981
      @waynewoolfe981 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      emf means electromotive force but I don't know what pd drop is.

    • @The_Green_Man_OAP
      @The_Green_Man_OAP 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Potential difference drop = voltage drop caused by components of the circuit doing work, which ends up being converted to heat.

  • @ethanwrightson5586
    @ethanwrightson5586 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful, thank you!

  • @Tinashe269
    @Tinashe269 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks so much

  • @humayunrashid8351
    @humayunrashid8351 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Could you go over astrophysics in more detail please

    • @brendawilliams8062
      @brendawilliams8062 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If this is astrophysics, then chain me to the wall cause I ain’t going no further. Lol

  • @cfrancisgaming8548
    @cfrancisgaming8548 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really helpful video Godspeed

  • @laurencereeves4990
    @laurencereeves4990 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:52 not explained why the right hand loop behaves differently to left

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The right loop has two resistors so it's not straightforward to calculate their respective voltages. Therefore, solve for the middle resistor's voltage by analyzing the left loop first.

  • @Ei5hipishi
    @Ei5hipishi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:27 is it 2v because 10v + 2v = 12v ???

    • @DapaChrons
      @DapaChrons 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes

  • @madagascar8794
    @madagascar8794 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does internal resistence not affect the second law?

  • @jacobb7379
    @jacobb7379 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    With the 2nd law, how can you call it a closed loop when there are other currents entering the system?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just means complete loop, no breaks.

    • @jacobb7379
      @jacobb7379 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceShorts Oh right ok, thank you very much.

  • @motivationformuslims1214
    @motivationformuslims1214 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the great explanation

  • @abd1x7
    @abd1x7 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How is there there the big blue current loop
    How is the current moving against the current direction on the left
    With the big loop

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The arrow drawn for the loop just shows the net direction of p.d., not the current (supposed to, anyway)

  • @QasimAli-nv3pc
    @QasimAli-nv3pc ปีที่แล้ว

    i still dont understand why ontop of the 10 ohms is 2 voltage how did you work that out

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      12-10

    • @BqqqBbq
      @BqqqBbq 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ScienceShortsyou can't just take away voltage by resistance

  • @SirFancyPantsMcee
    @SirFancyPantsMcee 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have a bunch of these as problems that can be solved? Do you know a place that makes them if you dont? Also, What is PD drop. I am super knew trying to figure this out.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      An emf is a pd rise. Pd 'drop' merely describes the opposite. It's just a drop in potential.

    • @SirFancyPantsMcee
      @SirFancyPantsMcee 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceShorts thank you so much for your video. I just got into this and your content was pretty easy to understand thank you for the clarification.

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ScienceShorts Does p.d. stand for potential difference? Sorry, I've never seen that shorthand/abbreviation used before.

    • @daisy6392
      @daisy6392 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@epochseven4197 it does

  • @Felmich
    @Felmich ปีที่แล้ว

    can someone explain why the total EMF for the loop in the final question is 2V

  • @abdomuse9953
    @abdomuse9953 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does the 30 ohm resistor only take the 10V cell into account, what about the 12V cell. Please reply this is really bothering me.

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because he analyzed the circuit by breaking down into loops. The example circuit he gave has three loops. One loop on the left, one loop on the right, and one big loop for the entire circuit. That's why you see him covering the right loop with his hand when calculating the voltage for the resistor in the middle.

  • @vjamie2280
    @vjamie2280 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy is the real goat

  • @Awai_quotes
    @Awai_quotes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The real question is how you actually do the last question?🤔🤔

    • @The_Green_Man_OAP
      @The_Green_Man_OAP 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I cheated and used a simulation!
      (Answers above)

  • @nagimka986
    @nagimka986 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you add the emfs to get the total voltage across the curcuit? 4:41

  • @maricrisfurton637
    @maricrisfurton637 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how did you get the 2v?

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which 2v? For the 10 ohm resistor on top or the overall emf for the circuit?

  • @chukz_ldn108
    @chukz_ldn108 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where's the 3rd law?

  • @federicopinto9353
    @federicopinto9353 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This channel is great

  • @sankarpa3581
    @sankarpa3581 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    EXCELLENT MY DOUBT IS CLEARED

  • @steveclarencesimo61
    @steveclarencesimo61 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why have you taken different directions in boths loops

    • @boakyeo-a2455
      @boakyeo-a2455 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Current flows from positive terminal

  • @Atharva-j2y
    @Atharva-j2y 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing thnks

  • @Issy035beats
    @Issy035beats 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perfect video

  • @ahlamamr4659
    @ahlamamr4659 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why did he ignore the 10 ohm?

  • @archieadcock7277
    @archieadcock7277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What sort of application could this sort of circuit have, in a building for example?

  • @rebelraime2524
    @rebelraime2524 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm confused, aren't you meant to use simultaneous equations? That's what I learned from your last video on this topic.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you wanted to solve the last example, you would need to - but that is beyond A-level. All it did was confuse people!

    • @rebelraime2524
      @rebelraime2524 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ScienceShorts Wait hang on, it's beyond A Level? Haha I've gone and learned how to do all that now

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Doesn't hurt! 😂
      You might have to use simultaneous equations when it comes to forces, but you won't have to in this situation.

    • @rebelraime2524
      @rebelraime2524 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ScienceShorts Oh well I didn't think simultaneous equations here were that hard, I found it useful. I guess I know how to calculate current for my own personal knowledge lol

  • @umumuntuksemua9831
    @umumuntuksemua9831 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much! Greetings from a freshman from Indonesia!!

  • @zeroitedono2547
    @zeroitedono2547 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    don't you mean potential drops/potential difference?

  • @alihamas1841
    @alihamas1841 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone explain why it's I1+I2=I3 and not I1= I2 + I3

  • @petrahrabakova752
    @petrahrabakova752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! Thank you ☺️

  • @theastuteangler
    @theastuteangler 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you what is meant by "p.d. drop"? I know you mean voltage drop, but what is p.d.?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same thing!

    • @kevinanderson6754
      @kevinanderson6754 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      P.d is potential difference which is the voltage

    • @epochseven4197
      @epochseven4197 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wonder if it's a regional thing because I've never heard or seen "p.d. drop" when I was in school. I'm guessing in Britain they use p.d. drop and in the U.S. they use voltage drop (which I'm more familiar with).

  • @crystaljohns4163
    @crystaljohns4163 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much 😭

  • @maxpayne5257
    @maxpayne5257 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    should the loop direction match the assumed current direction?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No - you don't know which way the currents are going, all you can do initially is assume. Then, if you end up with a negative current, you know you were wrong.

    • @maxpayne5257
      @maxpayne5257 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceShorts Thanks for the answer much appreciated.

  • @saharshanand2595
    @saharshanand2595 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video

  • @abubakrahmed7909
    @abubakrahmed7909 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what are p.d drops ?

  • @ahmadghaffar6758
    @ahmadghaffar6758 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you go over electromagnetic induction

  • @maathalabdali3425
    @maathalabdali3425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi I really enjoy your videos can you do 2 more electricity videos one on mean drift velocity and one on electron Gun

  • @xkl-physics7287
    @xkl-physics7287 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    6:17 looks like a fuse to me

  • @hamaadsiddiqui5480
    @hamaadsiddiqui5480 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:18 You said Ohm's instead of Ampere's

    • @fbdjwjflac
      @fbdjwjflac 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No he didn't...

  • @bellaswipe295
    @bellaswipe295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In my school they said its always easier to draw all the loops clockwise, to the same direction.

  • @mohamedgasim8330
    @mohamedgasim8330 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good explanation do you provide a private tutorial?

  • @brendawilliams8062
    @brendawilliams8062 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thx.

  • @hamzag9833
    @hamzag9833 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Again, I don't know why am here
    Still doing GCSE's

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You still use the ideas at GCSE, you just don't know the definitions 😊
      You know that for a potential divider circuit, all the emf must be 'used up' by the two resistors, so it's shared between them according to their resistances.

    • @hamzag9833
      @hamzag9833 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceShorts k thanks

    • @ubaidshah1910
      @ubaidshah1910 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hamzy g basically all the stuff youve been taught about parallel branches having an equal potential drop is actually just a specific case of kirchoff's voltage law. i think knowing this at gcse would have helped me understand circuit analysis better tbh

    • @hamzag9833
      @hamzag9833 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ubaidshah1910 thanks mate

  • @devluhar6902
    @devluhar6902 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    could you tell me where you got that final worked example question from?

  • @myrie1
    @myrie1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Came here to verify if my vocabulary is enough to learn physics in english, and...no, it is not, I'm already bad at Py on my own language

  • @kanishkanicholas180
    @kanishkanicholas180 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got that....thanks mr....respect you!

  • @shyamkanjee6409
    @shyamkanjee6409 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy, I'm glad this isn't in my spec (AQA)

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It is, dude.

    • @shyamkanjee6409
      @shyamkanjee6409 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceShorts Oh dear, throughout the electricity specification, AQA does not mention Kirchhoff at all. However, I did find a little section on the AQA book that looks into Kirchhoff's laws.

    • @shyamkanjee6409
      @shyamkanjee6409 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceShorts,You're right, they don't mention Kirchhoff, but they expect you to just apply his principles

  • @geezer1024
    @geezer1024 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    science shorts is the messiah

  • @judy-p4c
    @judy-p4c 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    so useful thank you!

  • @relentz9011
    @relentz9011 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video 👍

  • @amadif1793
    @amadif1793 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a test in less than an hour wish me luck boys

  • @JordanIzay
    @JordanIzay 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You confusing me .. i didnt get anything

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Where did I lose you?

    • @JordanIzay
      @JordanIzay 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceShorts 3:44 forward ..
      You said the direction of the current will be given in any question but in trying to solve a question now with no direction of current flow ..
      And how did you get that 9 and 3 taking the right loop *time of video 3:46 ....
      Got exams tomorrow cant get it at all

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you are not told, then you can assume the directions, and create an equation using Kirchhoff's 1st law (I1=I2+I3 for example). It doesn't matter in the end, because if you got the direction wrong, you'll just end up with a negative value, which just shows that it's going in the opposite direction to what you assumed.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The second bit: have you seen my potential divider video? If the right loop was an isolated circuit, the total p.d. (12V) would be shared across both resistors relative to the resistances. The ratio of their resistances is 3:1, so the 12V would be shared 3:1 too - that's 9V to 3V.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you're not getting how the 12V is being split up, it's honestly a bit late to be wrapping your head round problems like this mate - just saying.

  • @zakariadehache1235
    @zakariadehache1235 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love you Bro

  • @khizarhassan4152
    @khizarhassan4152 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rad video brav

  • @rachaelkenyon4712
    @rachaelkenyon4712 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Legend

  • @MuhammadBilal-ns3tb
    @MuhammadBilal-ns3tb 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bravo!!!

  • @generalaladeen9628
    @generalaladeen9628 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks mate!

  • @tylermcclenaghan7994
    @tylermcclenaghan7994 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quality video

  • @dineshkurimilla6217
    @dineshkurimilla6217 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i really love you sm xoxoxoxoxoox

  • @tgribmx5454
    @tgribmx5454 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍

  • @lynsmith3154
    @lynsmith3154 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please talk slower and have pauses to allow us to digest the new information. Beginners like me are a bit confused to start with. There is no need to rush through.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      So you want *me* to pause, when there's a perfectly good pause button? 🤔

    • @The_Green_Man_OAP
      @The_Green_Man_OAP 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ScienceShortsI can slow it down in my yt app. Can't they all do that?