Measure Theory 2 | Borel Sigma Algebras [dark version]

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @EzraSchroeder
    @EzraSchroeder ปีที่แล้ว

    7:57 let me know if I'm wrong but I think this is incorrect. The sigma algebra of M needs to contain M-itself. Not every set which is in M. M as defined is a set which contains two sets, each of which has only one element. M does not even anywhere appear in the indicated sigma -algebra of M. This has to be wrong I feel. Please let me know if I'm incorrect as I just started studying this subject.

    • @9lQF2r6m
      @9lQF2r6m 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The sigma algebra couldn't contain M because M is not an element of the power set of X. M is a subset of the power set of X. So M is a subset of the sigma algebra generated by M, not an element of the sigma algebra generated by M.

  • @VladimirRomadanov
    @VladimirRomadanov ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great thanks for your videos. To my mind this yellow color looks too bright on the dark background. Maybe, colors similar to Zenburn or Solarized color themes for text editors would be an interesting option. Solarized theme allows swapping background and foreground colors without of changing the accent colors.

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! Maybe you can send me a picture how you want it :)

  • @johnhouston584
    @johnhouston584 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:57 Did you mean "just form an intersection" instead of "just form a union" or am I missing something?

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are correct! I wanted to say "intersection"

  • @mahlatsemthetwa9552
    @mahlatsemthetwa9552 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The definition should be "... contains all the members of \mu".
    Fantastic content btw.

  • @freddyfozzyfilms2688
    @freddyfozzyfilms2688 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you know the arbitrary intersection is well defined.

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  ปีที่แล้ว

      What do you mean?

    • @freddyfozzyfilms2688
      @freddyfozzyfilms2688 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brightsideofmathsYou define the minimal sigma algebra as the intersection of all sigma algebras. But there can be an infinite number of sigma algebras. So the intersection could be a weird limit point.

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  ปีที่แล้ว

      And why should a weird limit point be a problem? @@freddyfozzyfilms2688

    • @freddyfozzyfilms2688
      @freddyfozzyfilms2688 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brightsideofmaths It wouldn’t be a problem. So will a limit set always exist?

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  ปีที่แล้ว

      Intersections always exist by the axiom schema of specification from set theory. So at this point, nothing to worry about :D@@freddyfozzyfilms2688

  • @babumaths8066
    @babumaths8066 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good talk, subtitle english, not access, spanish based, so future we want english subtitles