Physics and Mathematics of '3 Body Problem' - What Experts Say About the Netflix Series
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 มิ.ย. 2024
- Dive into the enthralling world of Netflix's '3 Body Problem' with us! Explore how this series combines deep scientific theories with a gripping narrative of global espionage and alien threats. From the minds behind Game of Thrones, this show not only entertains but educates, making complex physics exciting and accessible. Join us as we unravel the mysteries and science behind the drama.
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
00:38 The Historical Puzzle
02:42 Breaking Through Complexity
04:30 A Cultural Phenomenon
07:19 Outro
07:44 Enjoy
Best Telescopes for beginners:
Celestron 70mm Travel Scope
amzn.to/3jBi3yY
Celestron 114LCM Computerized Newtonian Telescope
amzn.to/3VzNUgU
Celestron - StarSense Explorer LT 80AZ
amzn.to/3jBRmds
Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:
www.nasaspacenews.com
Follow us
Facebook: / nasaspacenews
Twitter: / spacenewsnasa
Join this channel to get access to these perks:
/ @nasaspacenewsagency
#NSN #NASA #Astronomy - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
This deserve more views!
Coming up with a computer model I don't think is the issue. We're watching it on here. I think the issue stems from creating a prediction in the real world. I think the wildcard in the deck is not knowing EXACTLY what the mass is of the three bodies. That number in a computer simulator can be assigned but for real world calculations that has to be absolutely perfect.
Possibly, I thought too, if it is in free fall towards the center of the galaxy, the planets are going on skis, but how they rotate at the same time, we don't understand how!
super-cool af!
The scientific name is "n-Body Simulation", or "n-Body Problem".
"Three Body Problem" is incorrect, even in the book the planet of the Trisolarans makes theirs a 4 body system.
Ski the planets!
Lol, the second chapter of the video reads like the abstract of a research paper.
Best solution I found, one in the river, one in the woods, and one in the neighbours' dumpster! 🙂
Enjoying this channel more and more thanks, AI content is winning me over! 🙂
"3-Body Problem?" Sounds like a successful night if you wake up & there's 3 bodies in the bed with you.
Oh, he meant something else... 😆 Nevermind.
3 suns and a planet make 4 bodies just sayin'
Just the three stars. Almost impossible for planets to exist in such a system. Pre-existing planets would have been destroyed or thrown out of the system early on.
Assuming that there was a planet involved, its gravity would be so small it would never influence the orbits of the stars. It would be as if it wasn’t there.
@@IconoclasherIs that where rouge plannets come from?
@@danmurray1143This is a source of rogue planets. Others can come from collapsing dust clouds that are too small to make stars.
@@danmurray1143 Yes
Interesting show. However, I am afraid the real potential of the story was lost.
I think a minimum of effort to learn how to pronounce someone's name correctly is just a matter of common respect and good manners. Cixin = Tsee-Sheen. Wake up!
Is it our fault that the Chinese don't use the Roman Alphabet or even pronounce the letters properly when they do use them?
No more than it is China's fault the Roman Alphabet fails to provide sufficient sounds for its own language, let alone Chinese (or Hindi, etc.). The point is, there are plenty of resources on the Internet to learn better pronunciation, which this channel repeatedly fails to do when it comes to names not commonly found in a remote farming district.
@@djmoulton1558 I am sure that you will find that the glyphs of the Roman Alphabet are capable of forming or simulating any sound that the Human Vocal Tract is capable of forming.
We don't need all of them to speak English.
C K S and X for example.
X = CKS
No, not even close. The X in the Chinese Pinyin system, for example, is actually pronounced with the the tip of the tongue touching the base of the front lower teeth. Lots of gyrations in human speech.
Forgot to mention the propaganda aspect of the media
I don't see any problem. Why do you see a problem that doesn't exist? Three bodies of the same mass are the same as three points, and after the three points the center of mass is the same, i.e. the center is "outside", i.e. in a super position, then it is not three points but one central point. Your problem is in asserting body mass and movement. You are banging on with what you invented without any proof of its existence.
I hate it when people make lie just to make worthless videos that mean nothing at all. Please get off TH-cam.