What NO ONE Can EXPLAIN About the Attack on TRUMP
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
- On July 13th, Thomas Matthew Crooks nearly changed history when he attempted to shoot Donald Trump. However, the assassination attempt has raised many questions about the Secret Service. In this video, we’ll share all the details.
Join the VisualPolitik community and support us on Patreon: / visualpolitik
As lost as an octopus in a garage?
That’s a new one for me
He wash his car times enough to the octopus has water, and he storage his fish food remains in the garage instead the food remains recycling bin, because its too cold or too hot outside.
@@ricardoxavier827 Can someone translate this?
What I mean is it provides no new information. It just poses a series of questions from a so called news channel this is very poor. If you watch task and purpose analysis you will may see what I mean. It adds nothing new to the whole issue. If that had of frame it in the way of no answers but didn't ask such leading/misleading questions and and stick to the known facts and left out the speculation. It would have been ok.
Hey, you can go over this like a blind dog in a meat house and see it don't pass the sniff test.
You missed Teddy Roosevelt, the one with the most similar situation. He got shot while giving a speech on the campaign trail as a former president trying to get reelected. Also, they both had very minor wounds from it.
Except Teddy was shot in the chest before his speech started and he went on to give a 3 hour speech before going to the hospital. Imagine having a president that bad ass now? He challenged visiting dignitaries to (friendly) boxing matches and wrestling matches at the Whitehouse. Imagine a president saying to Putin, "Let's go to the basement and settle this like men." lol
Minor? The only things that kept the bullet from hitting Teddy's heart were the glasses and thick speech he had in his breast pocket.
You can't compare now and before like you can't compare security before/after 9/11.
There's also FDR, Gerald Ford (twice in a month), Nixon (with a plane, not a gun), and Andrew Jackson.
Teddy had no SS protection. SS didn't do presidential protection until much later; they only focus on Treasury crimes
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity
Fr
@@ronrozen2105that a bit to much stupidity for the secret service a group of grade school kids could have offered better security
remember the trump rally to the white house? remember the secret police bashing up the window and blaming some protestants that tehy did it and tried to put them in jail? there are litterally videos of it, of protestors recording it and the secret police trying to convince people to go inside the broken window.
i remember one protestor saying "hey what the hell are you doing?" afterwards the secret service tried to accuse the protestor he was breaching into the white house..
also remember when the secret service let every protestor go through and even wave hello and afterwards they try to spin the truth saying there were beasts trying to destroy the white house??
yeah this event isn't sheer coincidence, they knew about it.
Very untrue in high performance positions
July 13 is smack in the middle of summer vacation. Crew is understaffed, can't get replacements, is bored and complacent with another Rally. Incompetence is the better explanation.
Ok, one more point. They say there was officers inside the building the shooter was on. I don’t know if anyone has been inside metal building but it is very loud crossing a tin rooftop. I have built many of these type of building and it is impossible not to hear a person on the roof
and? They probably assumed it was one of their sniper teams on the roof. They had explicitly said they wanted their teams on the roof.
@@ThatGuy-bz2in I keep hearing that word a lot in this story. I would ASSUME that if my job was to protect someone like President Trump I wouldn’t be ASSUMING anythig
@@TheKudukiller
After years of no action you would most probably assume it is just another false alarm.
@@ThatGuy-bz2in- “… wanted their teams on the roof”
Local enforcement wanted people on the roof.
It was also stated that it was too hot so people were not persistently deployed.
The secret service head also said they did not want to put people on a slanted roof.
Resigned Cheeto is a disgrace, not having any information.
@@DavidHalko I'm not sure you made a point anywhere in there that was relevant to what was discussed. The question was why didn't officers who may have heard someone on the roof stop the shooter. My answer was they believed it was one of theirs. You didn't really say anything relevant to what I said though.
The screw ups of secret service are so many in the past that this one is hardly a surprise
Good enough for government work.
No
Like how they "accidentally" deleted all phone communication on January 6th that could implicate Trump?
@@maynard789 that is how we know the democrats were in on it, only the government could mess up that bad
don’t forget that George W Bush was almost got hit by a shoe.
And a grenade from a speech in Georgia
LOL, that old man dodged that shoe like Bruce Lee. Both of them! haha
In all fairness, it should be easier to get close to the president with a shoe than with a rifle
Bush has Ultra instinct , he's fine!
@@WokeismIsMarxism
I doubt Bruce Lee would have liked George Warmonger Bush.
You know it's fishy when channels like this one can smell the stink.
Yep this guy hates Trump but this is just to much for secret service to simply claim negligence
If it was an inside job the plotters would have picked a scapegoat that would have been easy to manipulate/already radicalized so they could just push the would be assassin in the right direction and no one would question motives.
All the various authorities were guilty of is plain negligence, complacency, incompetence, and sheer brainlessness.
Big Tampon planned on clipping Trump's ear in order to sell a bunch of pads for Republicans to put on ears at the rallies.
Big Tampon planned this to get Republicans to put maxi pads on their ears.
Sales 📈
VisualPolitik doesn't merit that snide disrespect.
The purpose behind it was to make Donnie a martyr without actually becoming a martyr?
Yeah, I don't get it. There was no way that rifle and non-magnified red dot from 180 yards with a 5" deviation could possibly deliberately hit Trump's ear while he was moving it all around in a 5 mph wind.
Exactly
Interesting conspiracy theory. What would be the logistics involved with that? How many people would have to be in on it?
@@dougzack4565what about the dead bystanders
@@stachowi Corey Comperatore, killed. David Dutch, severely wounded.
James Copenhaver, severely wounded.
Rep. Ronny Jackson’s nephew, and four Pittsburgh Police Department officers were slightly wounded.
MSM doesn’t care about any of those people.
This is the third video from this channel (which i like a lot usually) that is highly theoratical, not at all reporting on a geopolitical news but just theorizing highly speculatively. I am losing faith and interest quicly. commenting on trends and events is within the scope but speculating on conspiracy theories and quoting MTG is another
Another big turn off recently was quoting the heritage foundation on French economics (which are bad, no problem there) but quote anything BUT the heritage foundation
What were the other two?
I agree, not a great video. Task & Purpose covered better.
Why does everyone keep using Cook's childhood picture? I could understand if this was done right after the event, it was the only thing people could find. But it has been a month and a half, and there is even video of him walking around at the event.
@@hhf39p another thing that no one is covering is the video of cook saying he hated President Trump and all republicans. He was not a republican, he may have registered several years ago but he was definitely not republican when he made that video
3:16 "Very, very good aim" LOL. I love when European civilians share their "expert" opinions on shooting. He fired 8 times from a prone position at 150 yards with a DPMS-brand AR and only came close with once, this is awful. If you can't consistently hit a man sized target at 200 yards with a rifle, you have no business in competition shooting.
Hell, the last 2 gun competition I watched had 6 inch circles at 200 yards after a 100 yard sprint. Firing prone and rested is a hell of a lot easier than in a standing position while you are sucking down air.
Thank you
True many experts have commented it was such an easy shot at that distance. Trump was lucky the guy was absolutely terrible.
No joke; hitting a functionally completely stationary, man-sized target, from the prone, with a rifle, at 150m, really is not very difficult. 1 "functional hit" out of 8 shots is awful; with that said, accuracy in stressful/combat environments plummets quite precipitously, and I imagine he likely felt a good bit of pressure while shooting.
It was very poor shooting. As Yayhandles says, at that tange with that number of shots .....🤔
Nobody ever told you guys that "What you can explain with incompetence, doesn't have to be explained by a conspiracy?" It is kind of a good rule.
Hanlons Razor. It is a saying that reads: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Think that is what you're after, but the same thing.
I don't get these videos. Trump is the most controversial person in America. Of course he is going to get assassination attempts.
The assassin was a loser probably looking to be famous. He didn't really have any friends, and wasn't there.
And the secret service just were incompetent. No conspiracy is needed. Trump lived, because they were ontop of him, which forced the lunatic to fire quickly, and Trump moved his head.
This is why pros shoot body mass.
Talk about making a video just to stir it up. Got nothing. No new information. Just click bait.
It would have to be incompetence of like 7 different things from several depepartments all coming together at the perfect time. Not impossible, but questionable at the least
It might have been incompetence for Crooks body to be cremated before it was released by the coroner.
This is exactly what the US needs; more tinfoil hat conspiracy theories 🤓
what part?:
That the secret service look incompent?
That it lack the personal to protect the person they have to protect?
US? It's 100% global interest sweetie.
It continuely shocks me that nobody in the news mentions that a person did get killed some one in the crowd a sherrif was it ?.??? I cant remember but as well 2 other people injured who were they why hasnt anybody talked about them werent their lives as important besides the young shooter who was he for instance and why and i think the whole thing was a setup clear as day a surgeon said if it had been a bullet that shered his ear at least half his ear would’v come off and it healed so called with in about 2 weeks ???? Man if anything was fake that was except the tragidy of that young man being shot ( cant talk if your dead right ) and his parents can you imagine that and then the death of someone who apparently was known in the community and 2 other people seriously injured how are they by the way nobody told anybody anything about these 4 people and their relloes so what went on please tell us at least something about these other people who suffered the consequences of trumps bad turnouts God i cant stomach that whole trump mob ( for entertainment purposes only offcourse please vote Blue for the worlds sake 💟☮️☸️✝️🛐🕉️✡️🇦🇺🇦🇺🦘🦘🌈🌈🌷🌹💐💐🍀🌎🌺🙏🙏💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
His name was Corey Comperatore. Nobody in the msm cares that he was killed, because he was a Trump supporter.
The men that were seriously injured are: James Copenhaver and David Dutch.
Rep. Ronny Jackson’s nephew was slightly wounded in the neck, and four Pittsburgh Police Department officers were slightly wounded by bullet fragments.
That one chick SA agent that seemingly didn’t know how to holster a pistol says it all.
Maybe just regular incompetence or laziness, all suggested things would involve more work. Police regularly seem to critic the secret service, it just comes to light whenever security fails.
they were registering as republican to vote against trump in the primaries
Bad aim..? No. That was pretty good aim. A head shot at 100m is more difficult than you think. Trump avoided the bullet, but it was on target.
Hand of god IMO
@@stachowi I'll take it.
Please make the title less click baity. You guys are slipping
The video itself is a slipup, so much conspiracy theories, it's like I'm watching another channel.
Mhmhmhm.... I don't know... did you listen...?
1)no reason to be understaffed
2)no reason not to do the same as any other events...
I mean, I'm all for "the bullet shouldn't have touched just the ear..."
And with that goes my ability to discover your country... well I'm perfectly fine in other parts of the world... sad but true
big time
Yeah, they're shifting into "Top 10" territory.
you mean it dosent fit your narative
@VisualPolitik It's irresponsible to encourage debate, we should all demand questions be answered. But anything that clarifies the situation is not gonna come from 'debating' it's gonna come through specialist, the senate and house and bureaucrat doing their work. 'Debates' will only serve to muddy the water, breed conspiracy and misinformation. On a topic this serious you should be ashamed fishing for interactions on the video.
You sound like a liberal democrat
The more serious the topic the more people want to say something about it.
Suggesting we should refrain from saying what we like is very illiberal.
@@dustintacohands1107 True.
This is a very good summary of the questions surrounding all of this. Thanks for putting this video together!
Im checking out at 4:15, when he cites the ALREADY DEBUNKED claim that the shooter donated to Democrats. That was a DIFFERENT Thomas Crooks, who is a 69-year-old lifelong Democrat. Fact-checking is crucial for a channel like this one. 🤔
no this is a hoax :check snopes fact check on trump shooter donation.
Actually, it's your claim that was debunked. Please get your news from legitimate sources. He was a Republican that once donated to a Democratic PAC. The address used for the donation matches the shooter. This is fact, whether you like it or not.
Last video I felt like the script was written by an AI, but this time I'm kinda sure.
Considering the sheer number of times a US president has been shot, I'd say people GROSSLY over-estimated their capabilities throughout the history of their existence. Their competence is highly suspect. And if you actually look at videos of their training, you'd realize they don't even come close to a level of training of US military special forces, not even close. They are also paid a disgustingly low salary.
"Bad aim"? Seriously?
Maybe Trump ordered the attack, but the first shot got closer than agreed? 😏
No matter how you feel about Trump, more than three coincidences rarely occur back to back. So being open minded to all the possibilities is only logical.
In the immortal words of Agent 86, "Missed it by *that* much."
This is ridiculous, hitting a human sized target at 150m is extremely easy.
The Secret Service got complacent and believed their own hype believing they're the best of the best, and not constantly training like they should
FBI was like Willy Wonka trying to stop the kids of getting in trouble.
"No, stop" [Does nothing]
If you want decent analysis of the shooting and some answers to questions they bring up in this video go and watch the video from task and purpose channel. This video is nothing more than pointless click bait rubbish.
you mean it dosent fit your narative
I am usually a big fan of VisualPolitik, but this comes across as a conspiracy theory with no evidence. As you have no facts to back this up, I am sitting here shaking my head and wondering why I bothered watching...
The responsibility is with the FBI and Secret Service to release information. There's is 0 chance that probably the two most well equipped agencies in the world would still have no idea what's going on.
I disagree. I think they still leaned on poor leadership but to dismiss conspiracy at this stage would be foolish. We often dismiss all conspiracies because we all have that uncle that believes anything, as long as it involves the subject. The truth is, though, that conspiracies are real and common in many countries. We’ve been fortunate but if we are foolish enough to believe ourselves immune, we will fall.
Like they say, very likely that this was piss poor leadership, but the evidence is certainly not there to allay the doubts
you mean it dosent fit your narative
be advised: Under American Lingo "conspiracy theory" is just a dismissive call, not an argumentative point.
Actually, this video seems to be more about bring up questions rather than answering them. Ergo, no real facts.
Incompetence is contagious 😂😅
The saddest day in recent history. We are all saddened that the orange man is still among the living.
Don't forget that the SS deleted all their text message for January 6th. It needs a complete overhaul.
Seeing as I received a security clearance from those guys, these kind of events really deflate my bragging rights.
several mysteries. bullet healing factor is on par with Deadpool. high calibar bullet, no scars. why an ear wound requires you to be carried off stage like you can't walk. dodges bullet, grabs ear. face is bloody, raises fist. no blood on fist. incredible. ahh yes, these mysteries may never be solved.
5.56 is very much on the low end of the caliber scale, and there’s not a ton of blood in the upper tissue of the ear.
Who want to give his/her life for Trump? 😂😂😂😂😂
I wouldn't put doubts on him being a terrible shot. We don't know if what hit his ear was a bullet or a piece of shrapnel resulting from the bullet hitting something else. And even if it really was the whole bullet itself, it doesn't prove anything about the shooter's skill level. Even a terrible shot can be lucky sometimes. All of the follow up shots all missed as well which further supports the hypothesis that he wasn't really skilled or experienced. It sounded like he panicked after he saw that he missed and tried to shoot again and again without taking proper aim, which would absolutely be something an amateur would do.
Well. That was nothing.
How In The Hell Would Anyone Notice A Suspicious Person At A Tramp Rally. They Are All Suspicious Of Something!
Like what ? Please enlighten with facts...
“Opps- our Bad.” Secret Service
No surprise here, just utter incompetence
This video seems like a drop off of you normal quality.
3 billion dollars???
Wtf, why???
They are 100% pocketing between 2.5 to 2.9 billion bucks.
Another point, why does a 20 yo who doesn’t have a social footprint have 3 encrypted message accounts?
Why does a loner kid who got picked on hide his messages?
@@ThatGuy-bz2in wow, some one has a case of TDS, i think the key word in your reply is loner. If he’s a loner what does he need encrypted messages for let alone 3. Don’t bother replying I don’t argue with idiots, you can never get them to look at the facts, hope you have a good night
This was an odd video with several mistakes it seems: for instance the Secret Service has many other responsibilities than just being body guards like counterfeit etc. They have also for a long time had severe problems with recruitment etc If we can't trust you on this topic, how can we trust you on any other you make videos about? Time to unsub I think...
Okay lefty... take ur ball and go home😂😂
@@ChevBling great comment full of facts. Fantastic contribution. And I'm no lefty...
There's no cure for stupid.
Some bad takes in this video. It feels like you're really desperate to appeal to teenage conspiracy theorists to get an algorithm boost.
The host is fake/over-exuberant, and your scrptwriter is either trying too hard or not trying at all (I can't tell). Either way, it's embarrassing and disappointing to see your channel lag so far behind others in terms of quality. You guys used to look promising.
Your comment about the agents getting jumpy when the shooter was on the roof despite not seeing him can obviously be explained by a radio update. Someone on their channel probably raised the alarm, so of course they knew. Stop being intentionally obtuse.
you mean it dosent fit your narative
I think the problem is that they could not believe there would be a shooter; there never was in their whole career. They assumed the shooter was one of them. And most public services are under-staffed, and they also got complacent. And if you apply Hanlon's razor, you should never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence.
A hot slanted roof is the kind of innocuous reason that makes total sense to me. It’s why everyone on the ground also dropped the ball when there was someone clearly up there. Expecting someone to be up there from the secret service so didn’t act. I mean the guys actually said it out loud. It’s just unfortunate that that was the day someone was there to take advantage. Quite boringly they just need better coordination.
Boss I love your shirts. Classic.
This was caused By complacency? Luckily, for Trump, the guy was a bad shot? And all these conspiracy theorist do not take into account. This guy flunked out of a firearms class because he was such a bad shot. They deemed him dangerous. So this idea that somebody hired a bad shot to do a hit job on a president where they would only have one opportunity at best in the history of time is ridiculous
Sweet, we've become a conspiracy channel.
The roof the SS positioned on was also sloping.
Ironically, I guess the more one dislikes him, the more unpleasant it may be the idea of he listed alongside those other names.
i'd bet anything that this was not a lone gunman acting on his own....
why? there is absolutely no evidence he had contact with anyone else. The only things we know about him seem to suggest he was just looking for fame. He was also googling other prominent politicians and celebrities. Trump happened to throw a rally near him. It could just as easily have been a democrat or celebrity.
The planning of the Secret Service was neglegent at best and probably more wreckless than anything. The agents on stage did exactly what they were trained to do: surround and take the bullet meant for the VIP. The men on stage are heroes, even if the life they protected was Trump's
A couple things of note:
1. Actually getting a gun legally varies from state to state, and some states do make it unnecessarily difficult.
2. The investigation needs to look into the medias role in all of this. On the surface, some might question that very statement. However, something to remember with the media lately, is that they've spent the better part of the last 8 years telling people how much of a "threat: Trump is. No matter someone's political leanings, it may spern someone to do something incredibly stupid (and they're back to doing it mere weeks after the attack).
3. Some of the confusion from the Secret Service can be attributed to a lack of coordination of who's where. A viable solution to this would be introduce a "Blue Force Tracking" system to Law Enforcement that can greatly enhance their capabilities, response times, and even offer real time position data. Had such a system existed, the Secret Service may have been able to act sooner.
Finally 4: The idea of hiring those who aren't fit for the job needs to go. This whole "Diversity" nonsense needs to end, especially in fields such as Presidential Security. If people can't do it, they don't get the job. Period.
The bots are out in this comment section tonight! Butt hurt tribalists too. . .
Roman emperors were also murdered by their Praetorian Guard... Just food for thought.
If it looks like a dog, walks like a dog and barks like a dog, then it's a dog. Incredible inefficiency on 'imagination' and actions for an organization whose sole purpose is to imagine and act preventively on all possible dangerous scenarios yet incredible 'efficiency' in killing the suspect on the spot in a second, as if they were expecting to do so, whether he was successful or not. Who knows what that co-opted young moron could've told about why he do it or who 'secretly' contacted and coached him about the whole event, 'for a higher purpose'. The local cops possibly feigning ignorance and only 'acting out' when the common people shouted their lungs out about the suspect, as if 'forced by circumstance rather than by duty' is a harrowing perspective. No system in place to stop the event at the first sign of a serious alarm, like people crying out? Really?
Could it be a DEI disaster? The problem with the DEI theory is that, even if YES, DEI is the most stupid ideological stench that you could impose on any enterprise, replacing merit with 'diversity' (and so on and on) that takes quite a long time to sit for this level of incompetence (that is, DEI hires will shine in the years to come rather than as an immediate result).
Whatever, this video is about two crooks. :)
One named Crooks. The other one just a crook.
😂🙃
thanks
Visual and Economic politik videos used to be more fact based and less speculative
This is a country with 1400 fighter planes but could not get one to chase 4 planes over a 3 hour period???? Trump has solved his problem but presenting behind a taxi cab screen divider.....
One fighter plane found its mark over Pennsylvania
When listening to Trump watch for the "Vagueness".
Mr Trump said he lost the last election "by a little bit" in his recent 'news conference' in Arizona.
How about that maga?
It's not only Democrats vs Republicans, Normal Republicans would see MAGA as Ruining or already Ruined the Party hence the donation to the dem PAC but that didn't seem to be enough as Trump was leading the polls at the time, so being young and Patriotic you can see why he would do such thing.
Incompetence + bias = apprearance of conspiracy.
you mean it dosent fit your narative
Jesus Christ, guys please do more research. The Thomas Crooks that donated to democrats was not the same guy. Just someone who happened to have the same name in the same state.
How does someone re-grow an ear in 2 weeks 🤔
Usually I come eager to a new VP video. But this one was pointless clickbait.
Not is only VisualPolitik turning more right wing everyday, they are starting to get into the conspiracy bandwagon. I'm seriously thinking on unsubscribing .
Visual Politic and Right Wing? I think you are a bit confused about the terms, my dude.
What you mean is "they are posting content I do not like"
Your cancel culture mentality will destroy critical thinking. Critical thinking is a pilar of a liberal democracy. As a European, I do not care who wins in your elections. There policies don't differ to much it's all about power.
This is one of the most left leaning channel I know... so how do you say that they're right-wing.
@@alexanderatanasov5837 Thye're episode on degrowth misses the point completely, this episode is borderline in the ufo zone, really more right wing every day.
@@noordkant I'm posting from another account because Google is making you invisible to my account. First of all I'm from Romania, second of all canceling someone in a free market is not canceling, it's called supply and demand!
To paraphrase, don't attribute to conspiracy what can be attributed to neglect, incompetence and DEI policies and a shift in focus from performing the core job to being politically correct. We've seen exactly what has happened to the Secret Service happening to the US military. It's not surprising that when you shift away from training geared at doing the job competently to training geared at some political stance that such things can happen.
Calling shenanigans... what was up with breastfeeding agent. And the 5 ft tall human shield..
What an appalling piece of "journalism". Despite your conclusion you've poured fire on what you know to be a volatile situation. As if America didn't need to become even more unstable
Wtf does this even mean? You think covering a story should be prevented if it is a volatile subject? Oh no, your free speech as a journalist needs to be restricted as the story is volatile… like wtf even is this? Get a brain…
@@SuperGrAAs no, giving fuel to conspiracy theory nonsense is journalistic malpractice. There is absolutely no evidence of any kind of conspiracy. People look for dots to connect. They are just trying to make money feeding off of that nonsense. When it's something like "democrats turn the frogs gay" its dumb, but not very dangerous. But telling people that maybe the FBI tried to assassinate trump, when there is 0 evidence for that, is incredibly dangerous and stupid.
@@SuperGrAAs I started listening to VP years ago because it's content was thought provoking, sharply presented and well researched. They weren't afraid of tackling difficult issues but it was responsible journalism. Apart from the presentation this piece goes completely against the foundations I believe it's reputation was built on. This is a largely theoretical piece backed up by thin air. 15 minute piece, 8 minutes of groundless supposition, very little research and a conclusion which undermines the tone of the piece. Look, others commenters have gone into much more detail than myself critiquing this piece and you are welcome to read through their arguments. I'm just tired of this style of lazy journalism, that's why I have unsubscribed. The problem with conspiracy theories (and this is definitely one) is that they distract you from looking at the real issues
I wonder if they are usually sloppy but have got away with it because nobody was trying to kill their charges?
Um.... The kid was a strong Republican he believed in conservatism I didnt know this one was for the conspiracy theorists no thanks
(14:49) Shouldn't the Secret Service be watching suspicious people?
Btw there were other candidates and presidents the secret service couldn't protect. He really was a Republican this kid.
I honestly feel the kid was payed to miss so that Trump would become a kind of living martyr..... But that's just the first instinctual thought that came to mind when I first heard what happened.
An excellent analysis
It's complete bullshit.
There was no analysis. All they did was make bullshit inuendo and imply a conspiracy where there is 0 evidence for one.
OH NO, PLEASE DON'T SCARE ME!
Its not so much that he had a bad aim....he used a red dot sight that made it virtually impossible to be accurate at 150m.
If he knew what he was doing he would have used a proper scope.
The police was just incompetent
General rule of thumb I have is lone wolves are some of the most successful assassins. The three big reasons. Why is a death wish, hardest spot, and least people involved.
This stinks of sensationalist conspiranoia as a result of which I unsubscribed from your Spanish channel upon seeing you quote Marjorie Taylor Greene, now the EN version is to ensue, I will not even wait for her to be featured... BYE BYE!
How about this. Even the SS knows what a danger Dump is. They gave someone an opportunity. Who better than a kid who was a registered repub. The donation was just a carrot. Food for thought.
"The Secret Service has the best security minds." Uh, why do you say that? Its head, Kimberly Cheatle, was selected on the basis of her preference in intimate partners.
The holder of a BA in sociology from a place named Eastern Illinois Univ., she was recruited to the top Secret Service position from Pepsi, where she worked in security.
let's not forget the shoe attack to bush jr.
It was a conspiracy, everyone knows that.
I'm not that surprised there was a gap in security due to some miscommunication,... what I find really weird about this is how someone ended up at just the right time and place to exploit it.
Are there people at every or at least most rallies, looking for any kind of lapse in security like this one, just waiting to pounce on it? Doing things like observing sites with drones, having weapons nearby, but never getting caught? And that ensures EVERY gap in secret service protection is likely to be exploited?
Or did the shooter just show up at a random rally, looked around for an exploitable weakness, easily found one and went for it?
If so, was it just an incredible coincidence that he did so at precisely the rally with the rare weakness, or are such lapses just so common that if at any given time someone actually looks for one, they're likely to find it?
Or, did the shooter have some kind of insider information ahead of time, that the roof will be empty, even though it was supposed to have snipers on it.
Either way, every scenario does look kinda weird in it's own way.
The roof he was on was outside the security perimeter and the shooter spend the day before scouting is out.
You're assuming that the gap is an aberration. If this was the only time there was a gap and he happened to thread the needle through it, that would be very strange. If these kinds of gaps happen all the time, then it become much less strange.
@@thetimebinder Ok, but as the video says, supposedly the secret service told local police to secure that roof, and as the videos says, it was only down to a miscommunication that they didn't end up putting anyone up there.
This miscommunication and the fact no one would be there the next day is not something the shooter should be able to figure out from just scouting the location the day before.
@@ThatGuy-bz2in That is one of the options I consider in my comment there: if lapses in secret service protection happen all the time, that is pretty weird and quite alarming in its own way too.
@@SirConto It wasn't a miscommunication. The security didn't deem the roof a threat because it was too steep. That's why there was no sniper up there. Again, the roof was outside the security perimeter. The shooter didn't have to do a bunch of Mission Impossible shit. He just walked over and climbed up. When people spotted him, the security each thought he was a sniper for another security detail.
Learn to mix audio, your music stings are way too too loud and a danger to those listening with headphones.
Lol I totally forgot about that incident😂 I guess they’re not talking about it cuz it was a Republican
Personly, I tried to remove the shooters name from my memory since as far as we can tell he was just looking for fame. The donation was by someone with the same name and not him.
Having a scope is a regularbthing in tgat country area...
Wow... spewing conspirasi theory one would say😅
Are we reading too much into it? A stretched organisation that has to keep up with an intense campaign schedule on both sides... One communication lapse between the local pd and the secret service on sharing the responsibility perfectly coincided with a loner acting out
all i could think is either the secret service incharge is insanly incompetent like to almost a unbelievable level like how did they get hired level or it was 100 percent on purpose and either they didnt plan to kill him but saw a opportunity to let this lone gun man take a shot at it or they planned everything and it wasnt just a happy accident they took advantage off.