Naming Alkanes with Complex Substituents || Organic Chemistry

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @lovelymarkles
    @lovelymarkles 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i learned more from this video than i did with the first four weeks of our semester istg

  • @KBH4
    @KBH4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    OMG I was looking for thisss!

  • @mwangibrian8960
    @mwangibrian8960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for the concept🤗🤗

  • @thomastibbitts8293
    @thomastibbitts8293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very helpful examples thank you

  • @Mateo-oz3ew
    @Mateo-oz3ew 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good film :)

  • @user-mv8qx4si3u
    @user-mv8qx4si3u 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thankyou..❤️

  • @jasmin9778
    @jasmin9778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    for the second example, why wouldn't the complex substituent be a trimethyl? doesn't the sixth line count as a methyl? sorry for being confusing, it's my first day learning organic chem

    • @YourScienceTutor
      @YourScienceTutor  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The sixth carbon is part of the complex substituent's parent chain. Remember, the parent chain is the LONGEST chain of carbons. If we treated it as a trimethyl, the parent would only be 5 carbons long instead of 6.
      As a side note, the parent chain of the entire molecule is the 11-carbon ring as mentioned in the video. However, complex substituents are essentially mini molecules attached to the bigger molecule, and so they get their own parent chain to allow us to properly name them.
      Hope this helps!

  • @tuip1167
    @tuip1167 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much!

  • @ayusmashu
    @ayusmashu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is cyclo hexyl a complex substituents??
    Please help

    • @YourScienceTutor
      @YourScienceTutor  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, it is not a complex substituent unless the cyclohexyl had other groups attached to it, such as a methyl, bromine, etc.

    • @ayusmashu
      @ayusmashu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@YourScienceTutor thank you so much

  • @elizabeth-ty3he
    @elizabeth-ty3he 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why isn’t the longest chain off one of the other branches that make a 9 chain?

    • @YourScienceTutor
      @YourScienceTutor  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good question. In the first example, if we make the parent chain include that ethyl group off carbon #3, then that new 9-carbon parent chain will have 6 total substituents branching off instead of the 7 off the current parent chain. When we have this situation, the chain with the most branching wins.
      I went over a similar situation in example 2 of my previous video.
      th-cam.com/video/cdrLRXsOtKA/w-d-xo.html
      Hope this helps!

    • @elizabeth-ty3he
      @elizabeth-ty3he 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@YourScienceTutor thanks!

  • @carterburns6295
    @carterburns6295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why don’t we label the chiral centers with R and S notation for the second structure?

    • @YourScienceTutor
      @YourScienceTutor  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good question. Because it is easier to use, we prefer to use cis/trans when possible. However, you could instead designate each chiral center as (R) or (S) if you wanted to and you would still correctly describe this molecule. Keep in mind that there are some instances when cis/trans would not work on rings, such as if you have three chiral centers that point in different directions, etc. In those cases, you would need to use (R) or (S).
      Hope this helps!

  • @logeshrajap
    @logeshrajap 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unsaturated = alkene and alkynes

  • @acielysian3947
    @acielysian3947 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alkanes are saturated brother