I was lucky to learn from men who taught this philosophy of asking questions of nature, and how a good scientist is always attacking his own concept of nature to gradually chip away what he got wrong.
Hey William Briggs, imagine a completely new framework for science, with completely new models, from scratch, launched in a completely new kind of learning institution. In the south I think, with sunshine.
Great talk, Dr. Briggs. The questions, sadly, make me ashamed of my Ph.D.
I was lucky to learn from men who taught this philosophy of asking questions of nature, and how a good scientist is always attacking his own concept of nature to gradually chip away what he got wrong.
Thanks for watching everybody. Special shout out to my stalker Statiscool!
The best that we can reasonably expect in Science is that we are progressively less-wrong about things.
That's rare in life science. The norm is to be more and more wrong, with occasional revamping that ditches old conceits.
@Robert Berger What is the English proverb? Even a broken clock is right twice a day?
Imagine starting with first principles!
Patent profits are the reason why so many dangerous products and practices are in effect today.
Hey William Briggs, imagine a completely new framework for science, with completely new models, from scratch, launched in a completely new kind of learning institution. In the south I think, with sunshine.
I’ll bet all the five point Calvinists puckered at the 48 minute mark.