For all Judicial Services Exams visit here bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ Judiciary (Pre + Mains) bit.ly/JudiciaryPreMains StudyIQ Judicial Services Course covers -Videos of all the Major and Minor laws, Local Laws - Weekly Live Doubt cum Mentorship Sessions -Current Affairs Videos by Dr. Gaurav Garg, -Judgement Writing Classes, Essay Writing and Answer Writing Classes and many more Sessions -Test Series for Prelims -Subject wise PYQ Paper Sets for all State Judicial Services. Judicial Service Examinations of 15 States Covered- Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, Punjab, Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand , Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh For all Judicial Services Exams visit here bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ Download the App to Subscribe to the Course bit.ly/StudyIQAPP For any doubt, Call 95-8004-8004 Click here for Whatsapp Chat wa.me/919554443351
There is no question of reciprocity bcz 2 eminent jurist would be chosen by the PM +CJI + Leader of opposition In this case leader of opposition will also decide along with pm so how the reciprocity will exist NJAC is mandatory
Actually judges chahte hi nhi hai ki judiciary me kuch changes ho... Ye collegium system public and judiciary ke sath bhadda majak hai... Executive and judiciary ke bich abhi bhi Mel milap hai... Phir bhi govt apni taraf se supreme court ke no. Ko expand kr skti hai... Ek north east ek south ek west me ek central me hai hi... And judges ke no.. ko bhi hm bda skte hai...
@@__.906 Whatever you do in collegiam, It cannot act as a check to judicial system as end of the day, collegiam will be a subset of judiciary. Can an accused be allowed to judge his own case? Answer is no. Then can the judiciary check and balance themselves? Answer is no. Secondly collegiam is not directly or indirectly answerable to people or for that matter anyone. That is in principle against democracy and by definition dictatorship. Let's consider as you say legislature LS and RS appoint judges who are having 63 relationship with them, still in 5 years people have possibility to change them. There will be atleast some degree of indirect accountability to action of Judges. With collegiam it's impossible. On betterment of system, Judiciary had committed to betterment in 2015 while rejecting NJAC. They have not acted upon that in last 7 years. They will not act upon that in next 70 years. And by the way judiciary rejecting an bill passed in RS and LS is in itself unconstitutional. Raja gae agrej aae, angrej gae judiciary aai.
Very comprehensive discussion 👍👍 And I think all excutive legislative and judiciary have contributed it's role for to hold constitution objective But some it's loopholes has been also used for for specific benefit by some personalities
But it is necessary to maintain an independent judiciary and pendency is due govt failure to give infrastructure and not fulfill guidelines of the judiciary
You are talking about the efficiency of the Collegium system and making Collegium responsible for the delays in appointments of judges. But, the real reason of such delays is the Government itself. Government sits on the Collegium's recommendations and deliberately keeps number of names pending for indefinite period. The recent most significant example is the recommendation of Collegium to appoint Justice Dipankar Datta, Chief Justice of Bombay High Court to the Supreme Court. Although more than 15 days have passed, Government has not responded to the recommendation. It is not the Collegium, but the Government which wants to cripple the Judicial appointment process by showing reluctance to clear the names sent to it by making unreasonable delays. It is true that Collegium system also has some problems, but it is definitely better than leaving the Judicial appointments on the hands of executives. Independence in Judicial appointment is sine qua non to the Independence of Judiciary which is integral to the Basis structure of the Constitution and Rule of law. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the Judicial members to have supremacy in respect of the judicial appointments instead of giving supremacy to the executives.
Yeah! Very true....gov must not indulge itself in judicial system.. honorable SC is pointing again and again about the delay in appointment even after recommendation
For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ
Judiciary (Pre + Mains)
bit.ly/JudiciaryPreMains
StudyIQ Judicial Services Course covers
-Videos of all the Major and Minor laws, Local Laws
- Weekly Live Doubt cum Mentorship Sessions
-Current Affairs Videos by Dr. Gaurav Garg,
-Judgement Writing Classes, Essay Writing and Answer Writing Classes and many more Sessions
-Test Series for Prelims
-Subject wise PYQ Paper Sets for all State Judicial Services.
Judicial Service Examinations of 15 States Covered- Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, Punjab, Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand , Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh
For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ
Download the App to Subscribe to the Course
bit.ly/StudyIQAPP
For any doubt, Call 95-8004-8004
Click here for Whatsapp Chat
wa.me/919554443351
Wwwq
There is no question of reciprocity bcz 2 eminent jurist would be chosen by the PM +CJI + Leader of opposition
In this case leader of opposition will also decide along with pm so how the reciprocity will exist
NJAC is mandatory
Judges chahta hai judge unke family se bane esliye vacant hai taaki lagataar apne family se judges banaya Jaa ske.
There should be NJAC so that may follow the check and balance
We want change this collegium system
No place for meritocracy in Collegium system, it's quid quo pro Bhai bhathija types. Ceasars wife should be above all suspicion
After seeing the video I totally get the knowledge of collegium system
Only relatives being appointed to judges .
Actually judges chahte hi nhi hai ki judiciary me kuch changes ho... Ye collegium system public and judiciary ke sath bhadda majak hai... Executive and judiciary ke bich abhi bhi Mel milap hai... Phir bhi govt apni taraf se supreme court ke no. Ko expand kr skti hai... Ek north east ek south ek west me ek central me hai hi... And judges ke no.. ko bhi hm bda skte hai...
Collegium system hi sahi hai.
@@souvikroychoudhury5965 kaise Bhai... Tumhe lgta hai ki cji honge ko kisi aise judge ko select krenge jinka unshe 36 ka aakada ho...
@@__.906
So you prefer dictatorship with 0 accountability than democracy with accountability on executives towards people of India.
It's funny.
@@__.906
Whatever you do in collegiam, It cannot act as a check to judicial system as end of the day, collegiam will be a subset of judiciary.
Can an accused be allowed to judge his own case? Answer is no. Then can the judiciary check and balance themselves? Answer is no.
Secondly collegiam is not directly or indirectly answerable to people or for that matter anyone. That is in principle against democracy and by definition dictatorship.
Let's consider as you say legislature LS and RS appoint judges who are having 63 relationship with them, still in 5 years people have possibility to change them. There will be atleast some degree of indirect accountability to action of Judges.
With collegiam it's impossible.
On betterment of system, Judiciary had committed to betterment in 2015 while rejecting NJAC. They have not acted upon that in last 7 years. They will not act upon that in next 70 years.
And by the way judiciary rejecting an bill passed in RS and LS is in itself unconstitutional.
Raja gae agrej aae, angrej gae judiciary aai.
I think we only dealt with justice not with WHO??
First time I found any study IQ vedio which seem complete in info to me.... Thank you
What a beautiful lecture ♥️ Tons of Thanku sir 😘
Dressing sense of this guy is impressive.
Old school teacher 👍
Great in-depth explanation 👍👍
Colegium system bansbad ko badhava deta hai. Must be conducted an examination for judges.
Very well explained 👏
Collegium system ,nahi manuwadi system
Thank you sir 🙏🙏
Well explained video...thank you so much sir🙏
Very much thankuuuu so sir
Crystal clear 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🤗🤗🤗🤗
Sir very lucid and well explained
Thank you so much sir ese vedio late rahyega..... 👍
Excellent presentation 🙏
Perhaps waiting for their relatives becoming eligible for the appointment.
Very comprehensive discussion 👍👍
And I think all excutive legislative and judiciary have contributed it's role for to hold constitution objective
But some it's loopholes has been also used for for specific benefit by some personalities
सुप्रीम कोर्ट का एक एक बेंच प्रत्येक प्रदेश में स्थापित होना चाहिए, जिससे कुछ ही वकीलों के वर्चस्व को खत्म किया जा सके।
Smooth like butter 🤗
Wonderful important class... Thank you Sir🌹🙏❤
Well explained.
Sab categories ko representation nahi dena collegium hai
Thank you sir
Thanku sir
But it is necessary to maintain an independent judiciary and pendency is due govt failure to give infrastructure and not fulfill guidelines of the judiciary
Great 👍
Nice session
Appointment of judges is not transparent
After watching so many videos, finally i found a genuine video which shows the pros and cons of both the system.
THANKYOU sir for this amazing lecture
nice and I'm satisfied 👌
Now colligium system is going on or not??
beautiful💕💕
You are talking about the efficiency of the Collegium system and making Collegium responsible for the delays in appointments of judges. But, the real reason of such delays is the Government itself. Government sits on the Collegium's recommendations and deliberately keeps number of names pending for indefinite period. The recent most significant example is the recommendation of Collegium to appoint Justice Dipankar Datta, Chief Justice of Bombay High Court to the Supreme Court. Although more than 15 days have passed, Government has not responded to the recommendation. It is not the Collegium, but the Government which wants to cripple the Judicial appointment process by showing reluctance to clear the names sent to it by making unreasonable delays. It is true that Collegium system also has some problems, but it is definitely better than leaving the Judicial appointments on the hands of executives. Independence in Judicial appointment is sine qua non to the Independence of Judiciary which is integral to the Basis structure of the Constitution and Rule of law. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the Judicial members to have supremacy in respect of the judicial appointments instead of giving supremacy to the executives.
You should read constitutional debate of dr Br Ambedkar on CJI supremacy
Yeah! Very true....gov must not indulge itself in judicial system.. honorable SC is pointing again and again about the delay in appointment even after recommendation
Let the people of country decide who can be the judge and who deserves to be in jail
MOB JUSTICE that cant be good ,
Njac Full form?
National Judicial Appointments System (NJAC), 2014
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Sc is the Supreme Kotha
I do feel there should be changes in the Judiciary System, But the Executive should Stay Away from the Judiciary System.
Colegium system Bhai bhateeja bad
Collegium System should not Change otherwise the judiciary will not be independent rather it should be made more transparent.
Taki koi aur jedge na bn jaye
In 21st century judiciary is the most corrupt system in India ????
Agar y change ho gya to judiciary m bhi sarkar k hi log honge
😂😂😂hnn aur judges ki family ki log ho... Unse bhtr hii