The History of Physics and Its Applications
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มิ.ย. 2024
- STEMerch Store: stemerch.com/
Part 2: • The History of Physics...
Support the Channel: / zachstar
PayPal(one time donation): www.paypal.me/ZachStarYT
Instagram: / zachstar
Twitter: / imzachstar
Join Facebook Group: / majorprep
Video Topics
-Thales of Miletus: 0:36
-4 Elements: 1:11
-Archimedes: 1:46
-Optics: 4:25
-Rainbows: 5:29
-Magnetism/The Compass: 6:10
-Galileo: 7:29
-Isaac Newton: 8:30
-Leyden Jar: 10:20
-Double Slit Experiment: 11:24
-James Joule/Thermodynamics: 12:25
-Maxwell's Equations: 14:06
-X-Rays: 14:39
-Radioactivity: 16:00
-Alpha/Beta Radiation: 17:26
-Gamma Radiation: 17:47
►Check out the MajorPrep Amazon Store: www.amazon.com/shop/zachstar
It’s a warm summer evening-
A little physics!?
... in ancient Greece.
Revamp Agent 😂
Interesting question...to answer that we must ask- "What is physics?!"
exactly why im here :D it got my curiosity :D
546 BC all out of one element Thales of Miletus: 0:36
Eclispe
-4 Elements - States of matter: 1:11
buyancy and density (gold crown), mechanical advantage -Archimedes: 1:46
-Optics: 4:25
11th
-Rainbows: 5:29
-Magnetism/The Compass: 6:10
-Galileo - relative speed and falling bodies: 7:29
-Isaac Newton - gravity: 8:30
-Leyden Jar - 1745 Capacitors: 10:20
-Double Slit Experiment: 11:24
-James Joule/Thermodynamics: 12:25
Mayor was first
-Maxwell's Equations: 14:06
relating electricity and magnetism
-X-Rays: 14:39
-Radioactivity: 16:00
-Alpha/Beta Radiation: 17:26
-Gamma Radiation: 17:47
Chris Cockrell you literally saved my life! Thank you so much
@@anaanariba9100 Glad it helped.
danke!
A few things I want to comment on
1) TLDW: 0:16 - 0:29 on 1/4 speed.
2) I apologize in advance for the mispronunciations, researching how to say these physicists names was like 50% of the work that went into this video.
3) I already posted this but again thank you for 100k subs you guys!
I admire you
Nooo, I wanted the video to continue.
I admire you
I can't thank you bro. You are amazing.
It's better to go by scientists:
Early Sumer and Egypt
Ancient China and India
Ancient Greece
Ancient Rome
Middle Age Arabs
Copernicus-Galileo-Kepler-Descartes
Newton
Euler-Gauss-Lagrange
Faraday-Maxwell-Hamilton
Planck
Einstein
Bohr
Heisenberg-Schrödinger-Dirac
Witten-Maldacena
There is a book called "The Science Book Big Ideas Simply Explained" It contains many of the things that you mentioned. I just started reading it for fun.
The name is actually "The Science Book Big Ideas Simply Explained"
@@GPMS thanks for correcting me!
You smart boi
great video! loved it
It's a warm summer evening, circa 600 BC. You've finished your shopping at the local market, or agora... and you look up at the night sky. There you notice some of the stars seem to move, so you name them planetes or wanderer.
That shows the reason I wanna do physics lol
I stopped studying science at the age of 16. Nearly 10 years later, I'm discovering a passion for it that I didn't know existed, solely based on your videos. So, thanks!
That's because of this dirty education system of India. They destroy young minds and turn these interesting subjects into something to be hated upon. Even I had started hating physics and especially chemistry around 10th grade. Before that I kinda understood it but I never had any passion (except for space topics). I was mistaken. I thought the subject was bad but the reality was the teachers were the worst. Now I'm in third year of my ug and have found new passion for maths and especially physics. Chemistry is still far away. I should reset my mind to pre school days to study chemistry well again I guess. I hope you study well bro. Have a nice day/night.
@@ajay4319 what
@@ajay4319 coaching chale jata bhai..
@@paromita_ghosh I've mentioned in my comment. "I thought the subject was bad but the reality was the teachers were the worst." Hence I just left them completely as I was somehow getting marks. There was no problem too and also all the coaching centers only teach you for gaining marks for example, important questions, short cuts, easy ways to remember etc. I needed/need fundamentals.
Can't wait for part 2!
Earlier physics was fueled by curiosity, Now, by grades.
Sadly
I still studying for curiosity
I am seriously amazed at how little people care about stuff and the universe. I'm the only one in my class (in high school) curious about the universe and how it works, especially our phones, internet, etc.. They just consume it, and live with it without giving it a thought. Where is curiosity?
@@zokalyx yea, we either live as a consumer, or a creator/inventor
@@paulshin4649 u mean like artists poets musicians?
Your contents are so amazing and informative I love ur channel.
I wish there was someone like you for computer science. I still watch you and have learned a lot about CS from you even though you’re an engineer!
Glad you've still enjoyed the channel! My next two videos will be on python programming and then one on machine learning so hopefully you'll find those more relevant :)
MajorPrep Oh yes! Thank you for doing this! Those two videos will be great! Also your math video was very relatable, as you pointed out what math was used in CS.
Hello MajorPrep! I'm 15 & really love watching your videos! Do you think you could make a video about early college? I'm going into an early college program soon, which will allow me to go to college classes after my high school ones. I'd enjoy seeing you give your opinion on it & facts you found. I'm sure it'll be helpful to me and any other younger fans of this channel. Thanks!
Thanks for sharing your knowledge!
The Great Physicists' Road Trip by Ms. Rachel C. Millison
Great physicists and a few of their friends from the past decide to return to Earth for one last road-trip vacation to the coast together. They all appear on Earth on the designated evening. Heisenberg pulls up behind the wheel of a gigantic 1930's car, a huge grin on his face.
As they're getting in the car, Hubble looks up and says "What a wonderfully dark sky".
"Shouldn't be" responds Olbers.
"Always has been" says Hoyle.
"No, it hasn't" says Lemaitre.
"I knew that!" says an embarrassed Einstein.
Once they're all in, Teller says "Hey guys, this trip is going to be The Bomb!".
"Yeah, but why do I always have to organize?" asks Oppenheimer.
"Where exactly will we end up?" asks Kepler.
"That's impossible to predict" says Bohr.
"I just can't believe that's true" says Einstein.
Heisenberg punches the throttle and the old car roars off.
"Say - this thing sure accelerates" says Newton.
"I don't know, Isaac. It feels like gravity to me" smirks Einstein.
Later that night, as they are speeding down a country road, a police car catches up to them and pulls them over.[1]
"Do you know how fast you were going?" the cop asks. [1]
"No, but I know exactly where I am" Heisenberg replies. [1]
The cop says "You were doing 55 in a 35" [1]
Heisenberg throws up his hands and shouts "Great! Now I'm lost!" [1]
The cop thinks this is suspicious and orders him to pop open the trunk. He checks it out and says "Do you know you have a dead cat back here?" [1]
"We do now, a**hole!" shouts Schrodinger. [1]
"I think it's time to split" says Everett.
"Scatter!!!" yells a panicked Compton.
"Say, officer - how did you manage to spot us on such a dark night?" asks Hubble.
"I saw the light from your head lamps" says the cop.
"How fast was *it* going?" asks Michelson.
"That's simple addition" giggles Galileo.
"Not exactly" says Lorentz.
"Look here" says Heisenberg, "how do you know I was going that fast?"
"I clocked you over a measured distance" says the cop.
"How often?" asks Hertz.
"I disagree with your measurement, officer" interjects Einstein.
"Don't start tonight, Albert" says Bohr, shaking his head.
"What Herr Einstein is trying to say" continues Heisenberg, "is that time was running at a different rate for you than for us".
"WHAT??? I should have realized that!" exclaims Newton.
"I discovered it first" interjects Hooke.
"It's true" says Maxwell. "We're all famous scientists and, believe us, Herr Einstein proved it, though it came as no surprise to me".
"Must have been a real eureka moment" nods Archimedes.
"Extraordinary!" says Galileo.
"Extraordinary evidence" asserts Sagan.
"Well, it sounds awfully complicated" responds the cop.
"Not really. I'll draw you a simple diagram" says Feynman.
Totally flummoxed, the cop lets them go with a warning. As he drives away, Doppler cocks his head and listens to the sound of the receding police car. "Gotta love that" he says.
"Amen" responds Hubble.
Returning to their car, Lord Kelvin remarks "Sure is warm tonight"
"Yep - lots of disorder" replies Boltzmann.
"In places you'd never expect, Ludwig" adds Hawking.
"I was lucky to get away with that" says Heisenberg. "Most cops think they're better than everyone else".
"Yes - I hate inequality" adds Bell.
"Though you *were* speeding" says Faraday to Heisenberg. "I carefully observed the needle creep from 35 to 55".
"Actually, it went up in jumps, Michael" replies Planck.
"I couldn't see it because of the condensation" says Bose.
"Please keep it under 0.07, Werner" says Mach.
"In which frame of reference?" asks Albert.
"Hey, Max" says Heisenberg, "If you loan me a tiny bit of money, I'll pay it back so quickly you'll never notice it was gone".
As they pile back into the car, Bohr says "See here - you must fill the seats in order - no empty spaces allowed. And stop interfering with each other!"
"Only one of you can sit next to me!" yells an agitated Pauli.
"I need my own space" grumbles Minkowski.
"Say, Werner - it's stuffy in here. Be a good chap and crack the window a bit" says Hawking.
"Sorry, Stephen. It can be all the way up or all the way down, but nowhere in between" replies Heisenberg.
"Hey guys - Albert and I just figured out a great shortcut. Only one bridge" announces Rosen.
"It will save us a lot of distance" says Einstein, "but it might get spooky".
"We could just tunnel" says Hund.
"I prefer left-hand turns" says Madame Wu.
Arriving at the beach the next morning, they hurry from the car and stand looking out over the ocean.
"Look at the wonderful waves" says Schrodinger.
"They don't look like waves to me" says Bohr.
"This is not my idea of a sea" opines Fermi.
Looking down at the fine sand, Dirac exclaims "Look at all the particles!"
"Now *those* look like waves" says De Broglie.
"This is great!" exclaims Feynman, rubbing his hands together. "Now, lets go meet some girls!"
"Sounds good to me!" exclaims Schrodinger.
"Let's delay" says Wheeler.
"We have to be discrete" warns Bohm.
"I need to shave first" says Occam.
"What are girls?" asks Newton.
1 Based on, and including the original joke attributed to Rich Granger, Engineer, Battelle.
Lol wow only way to understand that joke is to know your history
Loved it!
I love how Zach just has one channel for maths and then the other for a bunch of skits.
I can't wait to see part 2
Woah!!You have clearly uped your game.Nice work!!!
What a tease, I want part 2
Excellent video as always
one of my favourite documentaries when i just wanna chill and relax
Very interesting to hear it explained with coordinated visuals.
Eagerly waiting for your part 2
Watching this video because im stalling on continuing studying for my electromagnetism test.. I should get back, thank you MAJORPREP I subscribed almost 2 years ago because I was an engineering major, recently switched to applied mathematics. Thank you for always inspiring both indirectly such as videos like these, and directly when you give your own input and suggestion. Looking forward to part 2! The history of Mathematics video was also very good.
Why did you switch?
@@leandros_ab wow I can’t believe it’s been 3 years since I wrote that. I’m actually about to finish my undergrad with a Major in Pure Math and Philosophy. At that time I changed because of a lot of personal reasons (car accident money etc) but I think like most people in their early 20s we are trying to have our life figured out all at once. I went into engineering with the wrong intentions of trying to peruse a career I wasn’t really passionate about. I enjoy physics and math. I realized I loved the abstract side of math, and I decided to peruse pure math for that reason Vs applied math after a semester. When I’m done with undergrad I actually plan on going to law school (related in critical thinking but not related much in its application) but who knows . Life isn’t linear, while I do have a plan to execute, some things are out of my control
lol I have my EM test tmrw morning and I'm watching this. Crazy.
Thanks for the video.
Great video thank you for the upload
Nice work..thank you 🙏
Now physics is done to push out massive amount of research papers, get grants, and grades.
Pretty sad.
yeh;/ and ppl need everytihn fofficialy typed..yettheres so fake news nowdays even if officialytyped, they vcan be wrong as well. thats qwhy im gona type my books about motivation..perfect videos/music for running, for relax/motivation-eveyrday life, processes..% of will power recommendations about activities..VIA books/utube videos.i dont wanna bother with all that ofificiality-and ill ha ve subscribers+buyers in futures o yeh..+ im gona earn money of my school teaching..and coach physical hours/athletuics.. i want to get the knowledge across i dont even care if i go on a loss of this or if som1e steals my ideas as long as humanity evolves-this channel alrdy has much of the format in which i want to present my videos n havebeen thinmkingabout..sofar preparing on notepads/facebookgroups
@DDrummer that in order for a theory to be accepted as correct u need to have typed it theriotically, not just prove it by some video or short-saying~lamen's terms.. and thats too much bother, especially if u are just some founder by 100% natural practice.. without having the words or at all official formation of language/time/energy to formulate it in some official publication.
I have so many theories for life, for psychology, motivation..but they wouldn't be accepted coz my field now is in coach athletics+physical teacher in school hours, and even if it was in psychology it would've been required to type the things official
All sciences have been affected by this, sadly
Great video 👍
Can you please make an explanation video on the History of Logic and Contradiction
I still do not understand how they come up with those formulas. Has the formula proven to be right? Also how is it possible to instill a formula from your own observations?
I think its kind of intuitive in a sense. Like how profit equals sales minus the cost to make the product
It is intuitive sure but usually it is through experiments or observations.For example let us derive the formula for force:
Now if you push something with your hand,you know that there are only 2 factors affecting the force you apply.They are the velocity of your hand and the mass of your hand.We have a neat concept called momentum which is mass into velocity.So we have to find some relation between force and momentum.If you push a 1kg block and a basketball with the same force,their resulting momentum will be different.However Newton realised that the rate of change in momentum is the same.So he made the second law of motion which states that the force applied is proportional to rate of change of momentum.So if you write down this equation and solve you will have derived the equation for force.
As you can see we had a goal of finding an equation for force.So we performed some experiments and derived it.Formulas like these are proven to be right as many scientists recreate such experiments or try to proofcheck others work.To instill your own formula try to get relation between certain quantities like the above experiment.If you have some time to kill,try to derive the velocity of a bob in a pendulum. Cheers
Through experiments. Observation is one thing, you need to run some tests then after that you need to compare your data. After comparing your data you will either have to do more experiments or a formula can be drawn up and tested to check its accuracy. The formula will come from the experiments.
@@fanimeproductionst.v.3735 Sure, there are some formulas that are intuitive, but you can't tell me every single physics formula ever (especially the harder and more complex ones) have been written through intuition.
Yeah. And we say those formulas or maths are real because it describes our observations well huhu 🧐😍
Is there a wallpaper version of 8:25? It looks beautiful
Was never a fan of physics at school but this video was so interesting
Zach star, you are a star 💫!
I love this topic
This is very nice
This video amazing
Thanks man
15:50 also, in german we actually call x-rays Röntgenstrahlen, so he got those waves named after him too!:)
Do germans have to be good spellers, your words are so long
@@ryanjones9498 tbh, the only reason that german words are so long is because we don't seperate words, we just make them into one long word. I.e. car insurance in english are two words, while we just put them into one: Autoversicherung. Auto meaning car and Versicherung meaning insurance. So they're not even that long if you split them up into the words they originate from. Thats why spelling isn't much more of an issue in german than i english. :D same goes for Röntgenstrahlen. Just the name Röntgen and the word Strahlen meaning rays.
Fun fact: there's even a game where we try to add onto a word as long as we can. So one would say Auto, the other would say Versicherung, another would say Makler (the person selling you the insurance) and it would still be a valid (although uncommon) word: Autoversicherungsmakler. As in, a person selling car insurances.
Ah, here in Sweden they're also called röntgenstrålar.
@@fang8459 thats cool..... no wonder why i like Germany....... Long live Deutchland!
Thanks m8
when will you post part 2 ?
Hoping 3 or 4 days
Actually Newton's laws are actually related to the three laws of Johannes Kepler(1571-1630) actually was the first one to suggest that planets move in elliptical orbits
Yeah, I thought I remembered this.
Thanks
Dear Zach, it is Kepler who showed that celestial bodies move in elliptic orbits and determined the formula to calculate that.
Isaac Newton, chilling reading a book
*Apple falls into his head*
Proceeds to come up with gravity and invented Calculus to support his argument. What a freaking legend. Lmao
No!
1. The story of the apple was most likely a myth
2. Calculus and the concept of of gravity was already there hundreds of years before Sir Issac was even born
but still, he was indeed a legend
EXCCCCCUSE ME:
LEIBNIZ >>>>> NEWTON.
Thanks.
@@mezzoedbey3802 1) It's a joke!
2) Newton and Leibniz were contemporaries. They both independently invented calculus based on Arabic trigonometry and geometry, which had been around for several centuries at that point.
@@arctic_line
1. I know that all of this is a just joke. But still he probably thinks that the story of the apple is true
2. Okay, I agree
Revenge on the apple
Remembering all of my teachers chemestry & physics .
Salute to Your Work 🫡
*underrated!*
I don't understand how people would have thought that our eyes emitted light to allow us to see, when we couldn't see in the dark.
About the planets moving along ellipses:
Johannes Kepler had found, after many years of going down blind alleys, that the orbits of the planets could be accounted for by describing the orbit as an ellipse, with the Sun at one focus, and with the velocity of the planet as a function of time described by Kepler's law of areas.
Contemporaries of Newton such as Robert Hooke, Christopher Wren, Edward Halley and others were aware and discussed that that an inverse square law of gravity was a plausible way to account of the ellipse-shaped orbits (and to account for Kepler's third law), but the mathematical apparatus to give a proof of that did not exist yet.
Among the many innovations in the Principia Newton showed mathematically that indeed the orbits of the planets can be accounted for as a consequence of an inverse square law of gravity.
(Incidentally, the mathematical apparatus that Newton used in the Principia was not practical. However, knowing that Newton had proved it meant that other scholars knew it should be possible to reproduce Newton's results using the differential calculus introduced by Leibniz. (Introduction of Leibniz's differential calculus was several decades after the publication of the Principia.))
Back to the planets moving along ellipses:
t's not just that you've skipped Kepler's work, you make it seem as if it was only after Newton's work that scholars shifted from assuming circular orbits for the planets to thinking in terms of ellipse-shaped orbits.
I'm aware of course: your aim here is to do a history of physics of 40 minutes or so; only very few events will make the cut. That said: while you have to be very selective, you mustn't *distort* history. This was an unforced error; you had the option of not distorting history while not using extra time.
It's so weird to watch educational content from you, but god damn, there's some good content here
Cool man
Anyone know why the atmosphere penetration isn't a gradient?
I may not be religious but i know i am grateful for all the circumstances that have brought society to where it is now.
Kindly make your application in Ishro and Nasa
I noticed that you made a mistake around 9:18 saying that Newton corrected the theory that Copernicus made saying that planets move in perfect circles
The laws of conservation of matter, energy, and movement were spelt out in the 18th Century by Lomonosov.
17:33 So an alpha particle is just a helium atom without the electrons?
Yup
Where is Aristarchos?
Nice
9:06 - uuh ? Kepler described that planets followed elliptical paths in 1609, 72 years before Newton published Principia Mathematica
Yes I should've included that, but Newton proved the elliptical orbit would result based on the inverse square law that governed gravity.
@@zachstar Yes, I realised what you meant after posting the comment.
Anyway, great video, even though I would have enjoyed a little more details on how these people derived their laws.
But I get it would make pretty long videos.
The research article I'm currently working brought me here 🙆🏻♀️
does uranus have lots of uranium?
What is the symbol between the _d_ and _at_ at 7:50? I can't find anything about it via searching.
The symbol is Alpha, and in that context, it means “reliant on” such that the unit d is reliant on a*t^2
@@bobnavonvictorsteyn9017 I found it, and that's not right. It is ∝, not alpha α, and it means "is proportional to".
@@dinospumoni5611 he said the same thing almost.
Nice video .. just that Aristotle’s lifespan was during the 4th Century BC .. not 3rd as shown here ...
>Wtf there's not even a part 2?
>"Published Today"
>....fuck.
Also with the crown thing I think there was some misunderstanding in his idea. Balancing the crown w/ an equal mass of gold is fine so you know m1 = m2, but placing them in water wouldn't make calculating the presence of silver any easier. Even as you stated, we know that a bigger volume displaces more water, so the crown feels more force anyway. Basically, if the masses are the same, but the crown is more volume, the crown will always float more than the gold, so how would that help show that there's silver in it?
If they have the same mass, but the crown has more volume, that means the crown has a lower density. Gold has a constant density, so this implies the crown isn't pure gold.
@@thegreatreyrey1 Nevermind, I understand now. Took me way longer than it should have
Wow an electroscope is a simple machine anf yet used correcly it con give you a noble prize.
please do you have friends who can add turkish subtitles please can't understand because it is english but i really want to watch
I can't believe that i missed so much in highschool just because thinking for it in grades😔
So many owe to so much to so few.
Reminds me of Sheldon trying to teach Penny Physics...
👌😉
Who said that fire was plasma? Isn't fire a reaction not a state of matter ?
I think Galileo did not do the pisa experience... if you do the heavier will reach the earth faster do to friction. So inconclusive... instead he demonstrate it. A clean demonstration. Suppose Aristote was correct. Then the watermelon should reach earth before the apple. Now you tie by a rope the apple to the water melon. Following aristote, the watermelon+apple should reach the earth before the watermelon alone. But following aristote as well, the system watermelon+apple should actually arrive after the watermelon since the apple will act as a parachute and slow down the system. The conjecture of aristote is therefore inconsistent... and then both case will reach earth at same time.... super nice no?
How would the heavier one reach the earth faster due to friction? Friction and weight are two different forces. And both of the balls Galileo used had the same circumference so the friction would be identical.
Can you make a video about Petroleum engineering?
You missed out on working stone, making fire, metallurgy, textiles, and dyes, among others
prinKipia
floored, im sure he learned his mistake later though
I don't think so. I saw probably round hundred videos by physicists mentioning Principia and don't recall a single other pronunciation.
RefrActive index = sin i/sin r
A law given by ibn al haytham
Today known as snells law
Listen dude can you please suggest me a book for "history of physics"
Dude imagine seeing your skeleton moving. I wonder if he freaked out.
I dont know how the oyramids were built without engineering and physics.
What would have been the case if the crown were not solid !
Tesla?
6月3日が作戦開始日だと考えてます。
Actually Archimedes was playing with a toy boat
Is it really Newton who discovered that the orbit of earth was elliptical rather than circular. I think it was Kepler, isn't it?
Yes! Thank you. I was searching the comments for someone else who also noticed that. It's actually a well known fact so it's surprising to see such a glaring error.
I came here from "Sheldon teaches penny about physics"
Thomas Young was able to safely challenge Newton's view of optics because Newton was dead.
Physics wasn't evented when my grandfather was alive
1:55 It's true.
Humanity's Best ideas DO come while we're taking a shower.
The foundation of our civilization is built on an idea of a guy taking a shower.
Bro I'm doing physics 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️ I'm sweating
According to Stephen Hawking na Jhon Gribbin that Galileo story isn't real
Early Sumer and Egypt
Ancient China and India
Ancient Greece
Ancient Rome
Middle Age Arabs
Copernicus-Galileo-Kepler-Descartes
Newton
Euler-Gauss-Lagrange
Faraday-Maxwell-Hamilton
Planck
Einstein
Bohr
Heisenberg-Schrödinger-Dirac
Witten-Maldacena
i have no idea about history of physics need a brief understanding
You may shun the sir Al baruni
Thales did not say that all things are made of water !
Ibn al haytham he was a muslim quranic scholar.
He used most of his works in the quran.
He was the father of scientific method.
"I worship allah(god) through science"
Hassan ibn al haytham.
I am overwhelmed.
2:00 imagine what the trial against the goldsmith looked like.
prob a total shit show.
"What?!? Because it floats!?! That's bullshit! That's not how it works!"
The King's prob just like "Man, idk who to believe. This Archimedes can just be totally full a shit head up his ass about this floating water thing... Fuck it, we're killing the goldsmith. Let's GO!!"
Application for Atomic Finite Energy and space Scientists research & satellite
Ionizing