This Is BAD, Bad for me, Bad for you, Bad for the Game. $160 For a SKIN? Praetus, Watcher Of Realms

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @RydasRealm
    @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for stopping in and watching my video rant! Remember to Like and Subscribe, Also let me know your thoughts on the skin and how you obtain it.

  • @calyco1114
    @calyco1114 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wait..... 160$ to be able to get the skin? Thats nuts. There is no way im spending that much just to ensure I get the skin. You are totally right, the packs are decent value and it would be amazing to have all those extra summons, but I cant believe they stuck the skin behind that much of a paywall. Im telling moonton what I think with my money! Thanks Ryda for making this video and voicing my thoughts for everyone else. This is great, keep it up!!!!

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are so welcome! Im glad I have at least one person that agrees with me. Lets see if anyone else does too!

  • @PawaW05K
    @PawaW05K หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I literally have 0 problems if a game wants to make money off of visuals not affecting the power of players whatsoever it’s just like in real life you can’t afford some stuff others can and companies make money , I don’t care about the skin I’ll never spend money on a gatcha game anyway and if people want their heroes to look a little different and are willing to pay I’m happy because the game is making money so it doesn’t die and I don’t have to look for another one because this one is actually really fun for a f2p

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I can appreciate that point of view for sure. I actually feel similarly in most cases, but pay walling a skin behind 160$ worth of purchases just seems greedy, in my opinion at least. I would be totally fine with it being a more expensive skin because of what the character is, just not to this extreme. Thanks for watching and commenting!

  • @dorakinwarhammer2946
    @dorakinwarhammer2946 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Well, what FTP event would be equivalent? Something like an INIT journey?

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very possibly.

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe the Volka event?

  • @benmillan3258
    @benmillan3258 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    nature of the beast. moonton keeps it relatively tame compared to other games in this genre. I would rather they lock a cosmetic behind a big wall than basically anything else.

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thats a fair point of view. I appreciate the comment!

  • @Mrunlucky0000
    @Mrunlucky0000 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lol, ppl spending today just hold off skin will come to the shop

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน

      You might be right! But if we show moonton we will spend that much for a skin, guess how much the skins are going to start costing. Thats all im saying.

    • @Mrunlucky0000
      @Mrunlucky0000 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@RydasRealm i know they testing the water right now I won't pay that crazy how ppl keep spending right now the game status is not in par we need alot of fixing before they should be putting 100 skins out lol

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely! I couldn't agree more with that. Some of the decision making has been questionable to say the least. Im not against spending at all, I spend. Its how the game keeps going and keeps being updated, people want to get paid. But there comes a point where it feels like a slap in the face and predatory.

  • @davidepanceri8192
    @davidepanceri8192 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    New skin still fat and grey sad day to be pope

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Couldn't agree more brother!

  • @michalispieris5369
    @michalispieris5369 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yeah thats not how offers work. The skin is not 160 dollars. You are not buying the skin. The skin is not even for sale. You are buying the packs. The skin is a bonus if u buy those packs. It technically adds to the value of the packs. It makes the packs even more valuable.
    Your argument is a logical fallacy. Its literally the same as arguing that u are getting ripped off by a company who is giving you a free mouse and keyboard if u purchase a computer because they are selling the mouse and keyboard for over 1000 dollars. Yeah that doesnt really make much sense.

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน

      While I understand the argument being made, I disagree totally. If you want the skin you have to spend 160$. I'm not saying the packs are bad, or you only get the skin. Im saying that in order to get the skin, you need to spend 160$, therefore the skin is costing people $160. Some people don't care or even want the summons, but they do want the skin. I don't buy other skin packs for the summons, I buy they because I want the skin. A skin being locked behind a $160 paywall is just not a good thing. ESPECIALLY since its a bad skin IMO. If you are going to buy ancients this weekend, sure its a great deal and why not get the skin too. Those arent the people being affected here.

    • @michalispieris5369
      @michalispieris5369 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RydasRealm Yes locking the skin behind a 160 dollar paywall is not a good thing. Its a predatory tactic to make people spend money, however the skin is still not for sale for 160 dollars. You cant just cherry-pick part of the deal that u like and say that it costs the entire price of the deal ignoring the rest of the stuff simply because u don't want them.
      And who wants the skin and not the crystals anw. If you want to use his skin you need to pull him and he is P2W. Most people who use him spend money. Usually a lot of money, especially now with Praetus and Ingrid banners 2 weeks from each other.

    • @RydasRealm
      @RydasRealm  หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're right, but I also say in the video that it's not a skin pack price. So while I do agree with you, you are cherry picking my statements as well. I love this debate so please don't take anything I say as an attack.