As an Indian Hindu, I was really ashamed of how little I knew of such an important part of our history. I have learnt much more through this video than in all my years spent at school. You are a compelling narrator. The two hours just flew by!
Mughals who used to kill innocent Hindus, Buddhists jain etc and rape their women are considered great and heroes by people like you. No doubt why India lost its independence because we hv people like you who pray to invaders rather than fighting against them. I m sure your ancestors must hv betrayed Bharat for their personal benefits that
You are too good to us bro... A 2 plus hour documentary is freaking awesome! And on a Monday! Thanks for your work and sharing your talent for making interesting documentarys. Cheers!
Videos like this for the Abbasid Caliphate, the Delhi Sultanate, the Ottoman Empire, Mamluk Egypt and Safavid Persia would be amazing. I will join your patreon in hopes that you may continue to share this precious knowledge with us.
@Iam ELIAS I think the context should be kept in mind - Yes, Ottoman Empire would easily wipe out the Abbasids, but that is because they lived at a time when the entire world was richer, more populated and more advanced. Abbasids still are highly impressive, altough in relative power I think the Mughals or the Ottomans were the most powerful Muslim Empire
@@juliuszgodek6514 no they were not Abbasids were the most impressive of them all they have the most well known King and for most part of Islamic world ideas came from their times however I will give they only have been in total control for just 100 years but put to mind how many empires ruled 11 millions square KM for more than that in total control
Mughal empire eventually was too big to control. Hence, infighting started, it started with Civil wars and then Awadh, Hyderabad state and Bengal broke away. Marathas were initially able to control the Central and parts of North India, however after Battle of Panipat, they started infighting as well. Scindia with Holkar, Gaikwad with Peshwa, Nagpur had multiple civil wars. That ultimately resulted in British Control of India.
no what tipped those off was the Islamist policy of aurangzeb. The previous rulers were more or less quite secular and didnt even levy jizya. Aurangzeb bought back the hated jizya. One thing which should be understand is to rule India, you must not disturb the local hindu and dharmic culture. Mauryans, Mughals, British all followed the same policy. To rule Hindustan, you have to respect Hindu first. aurangzeb had none of that. Thats why he isnt counted within the first great 6 mughal rulers. His terrorist like rule brought about many revolts and the mughal rule was brought to an end by the Marathas
@wisewisdom7879 Its not that simple. The Mughals ruled in India longer than the British. What led to the empire's demise was that the heirs of Aurangzeb were not as capable as him to hold the realm together. The bigger the state became the better and more capable the emperor required to hold it together. The expansionism of Aurangzeb had also expended a large amount of wealth. Eventually the British even with advanced technology couldn't hold India and once the British couldn't hold it together, it broke away and pieces of it broke off (Pakistan/Bangladesh)
@@lastword8783 It also had to do with the fact or examples away from the capital for over 20 years, With him so far away from the center administration for so long various groups that were normally swapped around as Zamindars Were able to create bases of power for themselves when they normally wouldn’t have been able to. At led to a degradation of Central control, and helped cause the empire to begin collapsing.
@wisewisdom7879 India is not like the Arab gulf or China in terms of its ethnic or linguistic composition. There is immense diversity in India which can only be compared to Europe (if Europe becomes one country, that is). With such great diversity, it is not easy at all to 'rule' over people, because there is simply no 'unity' among the people except for perhaps, a civilizational connect. We have no common religion, no common language, no common ethnicity, and so on. Mughals attempted to first use Islamic religion AND Turkic culture to integrate people. Then with the coming of Akbar, they tried to become more secular and Persianate, and finally with Aurangzeb they attempted to impose Sharia and go Saudi Arabia-like Islamic, but none of those tactics ultimately worked beyond few years because India simply isn't meant to be 'ruled' by a single commanding power at all. (And this is when Mughals did not have control over North East India and Tamil Nadu & Kerala. imagine the chaos if the empire were any bigger). Even in the modern day, India may have one Prime Minister but there are 28 provinces and 7 union territories with each having their own chief minister. For once, you can rule China and Arabia under one ruler. But in India, even today, it is next to impossible to do so.
@rishabhrox1 india can be ruled under one commanding power like how Mughals and Britishers did, all it needs is excellence administration. And for your kind information sharia law is only implemented on muslims, under aurangzeb alamgir it was fatawa alamgiri, non muslim have their own personal law. Jaziya is imposed on brahmins and temples who loot the lower class hindus and cam be only used either in defense sector or for the betterment of the non muslims alone. Muslims have to pay zakat which is more than jaziya.
I live in a small city "Rohri" in Sindh. Our Jamia Masjid still bears a stone engraved on it is "Sang e Bunyad Akbar Badshah" meaning Inaugural stone by King Akbar. It is believed that Akbar was born in the city of Umerkot in Sindh while his father was running from one city to another.
One of the best documentary I have come across covering entire mughal dynasty. Beautifully portrayed!! Indeed, it was worth spending 2 hours. Looking forward for more such historical documentry.
@@ARVINDYADAV-es6qk Mughals had hindu wives and mothers, and still you dogs will not stop calling them outsiders. If you hate them so much, destroy mughal monuments that bring in millions annually, stop eating biryani, stop using their language, stop wearing their clothes, go back to your half nakedness before the muslims came
Thanks a ton for this video and all your work. As an Indian and a Hindu, it's very tough to find well researched and unbiased work regarding Mughals and 7th-8th c Arab campaigns in India. Great to see a channel from our part of the world doing this work ❤️
@@rehaanaamir so like most of muslim countries..any history before 6th century isnt given importance..you people are pathetic..you blame other countries of doing the same things that your people have been doing a long time ago
After nadeer sha's invasion mughal empire dint even have atleast 25 horses🐎 elephants🐘🐘 🐫camels to fight with enemies like shikh people maratas jats🥲🥲🥲🥲 that's bitter truth nadeer sha's invasion was Devastating
I just read about this in William Dalrymple's "The Anarchy". The sack of Delhi was on a such a large scale that it truly ruined what was left of the Mughals, not just financially, but politically. However, they were in a profoundly weakened state by that point due to other factors.
I grew up in Pakistan and learned about Mughal history in grades 6 to 8, but it was only sketchy in my mind. This unbiased documentary in detail was enlightening. Thank you!!
@@spicybinga7469 not really, it’s no different from all the Indian empires before, all of which were probably worst as they engage in overseas piracy, looting, war mongering and slavery. It’s more of biases rather than we want to acknowledge they were all bad. I assume the Mughals get it harder for two reasons (1) they essentially created a South Asia concept that lasted until recent history (2) they are Muslims which rules over non-Muslims (same can be applied to when Hindus rules over others)
@@AshenAshAshythere was no slavery in india before Islamic empires they introduced it in india.....The level of warfare was never this organised because it was between smaller kingdoms so less people died A lot of civilians died during mughal campaigns against marathas
These types of videos are what I like. They are detailed, not based and respect both sides of thr story. Keep it up good brother! You make such exquisite documentries on muslim history 👍
100% love this! Lately there's been this hyper-nationalist Hindu/Indian "documentaries" that make verifiably false claims in the name of ethno-nationalists. Sure the older 20+yrs doc's done by English accented colonial apologists is just as frustrating lol. But you've seemed to have done the impossible.... accurately recount the Mughal empire's possible greatest ruler, without bashing some religion/ethnicity or raising up another. Much love man
@Netaji-The British Slayer And same goes with all the rulers of that time. Its like When you win:- See, How strong we were When you loose:- See, How Cruel they were
I really like your delivery sryle. I laughed a few times. It's clear you've done deep research and have formed your own opinions without letting them affect the scholastic value. Very enjoyable. New sub.
Goosebumps at 1:41:33 , as a kid when I read about mughuls the character who excited me the most was Aurangzeb , he tried his best but finally his zid took his peaceful life . I love how you analysed him and brought out the real history unlike people usually thinking he was the most cruel, and yes I am excited for the video on Sikhs .
@@NationalistBhartiya you act as if hindu or sikh content is un-biased. Stop day dreaming and do your own research and compare multiple sources instead of being fed up lies.
@@Nixo77 lol 😂 ☪️ can't build a single building in there homeland (except a square box 🕋) & they think they r great 😃.... In- vading loot distroying ancint temples that's wt ☪️ do.
Great video, and a great resource for information! I would love for you to a video on the history of certain cities next. The history of Lahore would be an excellent example.
It would be great if you could make a video like this for the latter half of the Mughal empire. Basically, going into detail about the empire and its rulers from 1707 until its official dissolution in 1857.
It's very sad that Shahi Bangla is forgotten and overshadowed by other regional empires when the fact is it was the most prosperous and wealthiest nation in the world
52:25 Malik Ambar helped found the city of Aurangabad, which is one of India's must-see destinations. It is near to the otherworldly and breathtaking sights of Ellora and Ajanta Hindu/Buddhist Caves as well as being a day trip away from one of India's premier natural wonders, Lonar Lake, which is a product of a meteor impact some 500,000 years ago. Aurangabad city features: a gorgeous Taj Mahal-like tomb, the extraordinary Daulatabad Fort which sits on top of a high hill with its sides shaved off to create a moat, and one of the most lively market districts I've seen in India. I spent a week here and every day was an adventure full of intrigue and discovery.
India was rich even before Mughal. They enforced jizya on non-muslims. Taxashila and Nalanda Universities were in India before the Mughal. Mughal came from deserts and barren lands of the middle East to the greenery and abundance in India. Indian architecture was very much evolved even before Mughals. Yes they did contribute many things but Indian civilization and history is way older than Islam itself.
@@75bugle They came from fergana valley and they were inspired by a pedophile to conquer the world in the name of god. I never said arabs. Get out of mindset of playing victim. Look around.
For a balanced view its important to avoid terms like Mughals “civilised” and created a “unified India” because it implies it wasn’t already civilised. India has been unified multiple times prior to Islamic arrival and by the local Hindu Marathas. Buddhism and epics like Ramayan originated in India and spread all over Asia. South East Asian languages borrow heavily from Sanskrit and Tamil. Their written scrips are based on South Indian Brahmi script. Not to mention a lot of foundational mathematicians later built upon by Arabs in places like Baghdad occurred in early India. I know some Hindus are revisionist by saying all Muslim rule was ONLY characterised by loot but many Muslims (mainly Pakistanis and Bangladeshis) have this idea that India was always some uncivilised superstitious countries with “dirty idolaters” living in huts before Islam came along to civilise us. We have ALWAYS been a great civilisation.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT not in relation to you more so people who may be commenting. Whenever there is a debate re Mughals there are commenters mainly from Pakistan who say India became civilised upon the arrival of Islam. There have been Afghans who told me that they developed India impkying that it wasn’t before. Not claiming you have said that but the general community has.
An insightful and engaging video that provides valuable insights on the topic. The presenter's expertise shines through, making this content truly exceptional.💯💯
Great video!! It's not easy to find videos about Indian history Is there a bibliography or secondary sources that you would recommend, if somebody wants to go further? Much respect
As a Hindu , i likes Mughal empire , it united our subcontinent and gave peace and prosperity to it. Delhi sultanate failed to do that. Common people wants peace and prosperity no matter if ruler is muslim or hindu. But Aurangjeb applied heavy taxes which leads to rebels.
@@shehzadadarashikoh9463 you will support mughals, until they plunder your Deepak nagar and rename it aurangabad, r@pe Hindu woman and killing non Hindus (including you) Then let's see whether these central Asian predators are actually good
@@basedtsar9440 fuc* Aurangjeb i don't care. I'm always with righteousness. I have his name because he was Most powerful and richest king ever lived. Although i don't like attachment towards people power and Money.
when talking about Jizya, why is it said to be done for take sake of humiliation? In Islam, Zakah (2.5% of the wealth one possesses above the nisab) was given to the poor by any Muslim that could afford it yearly. In tern it helped the economy with circulation of finance. Non Muslims did not provide Zakah. Thus non Muslim merchants were taxed so the wealth still had circulation, the non muslims had to give something to help the economy as well.Thus it can be said Jizya was taken from non Muslims in par to that, every citizen in it contributes to the empire, additionally it was only taken from a certain portion of non Muslims that had enough wealth, and it was taken to aid military in an otherwise giant empire.
Mughals are intrinsic part of our history. Under great Mughals india's borders were secure & thus it ushered in an era of peace & prosperity. We must accept our history as it is & learn from it.
Intriguing and informative overview of the rise and fall of Mughal power in India. Time flew while listening. Thanks, and looking forward to the two promised videos.
Kohinoor 💎Diamond was in possession of various rulers, it came into possession of Kakatiyas, Alauddin Khilji, Babur, Shah Jahan, Nadir Shah, Ahmad Shah Durrani (Founder of Afghan empire), Maharaja Ranjit Singh and finally, it passed into the hands of British Monarch.
One of my former profs once said that Shah Jahan loved mangoes so much that he ate so many in one sitting that he got sick with terrible diarrhea and subsequently became terribly dehydrated, and this set off the rumors that he was on his deathbed which, in turn, caused his four sons to mobilize their forces and war against each other, with Awrangzayb being triumphant. Then Awrangzayb would so weaken the Mughal Empire in the second half of his reign in all his wars that it facilitated the Europeans getting footholds in the Indian subcontinent with England/G. Britain eventually taking over. Thus, mangoes were a cause thereof. I don't know if this is true, but it is an interesting anecdote.
I am excited to see you report on the Mughal Sikh relations and also the rise of the 10th Sikh Guru, his successor General Banda Singh Bahadur, the Sikh Misls and the Sikh Empire. Interesting times here with Persian and Afghan Invasions destabilizing Mughal hold on Punjab
Islamic rule in India was a form of colonialism, characterized by the imposition of a foreign islamic culture, religion, and political system on the Indian subcontinent. Muslims were foreign invaders who came to India and imposed their Islamic faith and culture on the indigenous population. They point to examples of the destruction of Hindu temples, the imposition of Jizya tax on non-Muslims, and the forced conversions to Islam as evidence of this colonialist mindset.
LOL. Retarded points like yours only serve to peg India back in terms of its economic and social developmet, while neighboring countries like China steamrolls ahead with its economic growth thanks to zero distractions like the ones that you raise
@@topbandit9693neither were the colonialists a single entity and were also of the same culture and were vying for power within the competition of local rulers so I don't really see ur point
@@thomasjohan3138 The good thing about the barbarism of Islamic rule is that the savagery they are attributed with are quite believable. Thanks to what their radical fellow co-religionists proudly display. If Islam was spread using the blade of the sword on civilians is news to you, I think you were living under god knows what rock. They show their true nature and we call them a "terror organization".
Hi, your video's quality and script is too good, and the way you are presenting... I would like to translate in Bengali language and make a video in future Hope you will not disagree
India's population growth accelerated under the Mughal Empire, with an unprecedented economic and demographic upsurge which boosted the Indian population by 60% to 253% in 200 years during 1500-1700. The Indian population had a faster growth during the Mughal era than at any known point in Indian history prior to the Mughal era.
@@muazzamshaikh2049 The Mauryan Empire had approximately had a population of 25-30 million people at it's peak and Patliputra being the Empire's(and the world's ) largest and populated city. India has historically always been the richest place on this Planet prior to Mughals and had controlled around 35% of the world's GDP.
awesome video! great content in general, keep it up! if you could cover the ideologies and imperialism of more contemporary statesmen like nehru, nasser, bhutto or ecevit, that would be lit af! but to keep safe from all the trolls maybe something like the timurid court culture? the one babur grew in
The descendants of Timur who ruled in India called themselves Chaghtai Turks and looked down upon the Mughals or Mongols as half - barbarians . Rise and Fall of the Mughal Empire, Vol 1., Ram Prasad Tripathi Central Book Depot, 1960 p.1 The fact remains , in any case , that the people of India were accustomed to call their northern invaders Mughals , and that those invaders were for the most part both physically and mentally what are usually called Turks . The Turks In India: Critical Chapters On The Administration Of That Country By The Chughtai, Babar, And His Descendants (1879) Paperback - April 27, 2009 by Henry George Keene (Author) p.51 Mughal is the Persian word for Mongol, but the Timurids considered themselves Turks. They were known as Mughals in the Indian subcontinent because there the term had come to designate the Turkish-speaking military elite of central Asia. STREUSAND, D.O.U.G.L.A.S.E. (2019) Islamic gunpowder empires: Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals. ROUTLEDGE. p.202
I’m a subscriber but please don’t use terms like ‘jerk’ and ‘I want to piss on his grave’ for historical entities. We will ask for your opinion when we feel necessary, but till then, be humble and stick to facts. Consider this a request. Please.
Extremely insightful, except for the part where you criticise jizya for non Muslims because Muslims too had to practice giving zakat which more often than not were more costly than jizya. Not to mention majority of the general population had income less than what is needed to pay jizya.
Taxing someone to pay one part of the earning for Donation cant be compared with taxing someone just because he is of different religion. Jaziya is criticized not majorly because of its economic Impact, but because of its Psychological Impact where you are taxing all other people who are from other religion, a kind of soft force for conversion too. & even worse than Jaziya was the Pilgrimage Tax.
1:49:25 You are wrong.. Aurangzeb are not deemed unlegitimate accorfing yo Islamic rule It is more matters of intrrnal Mughal suvcession. Despite the Shariff of Mecca didnt accept his tributes earlier, it is because there is limited information from Shariff of Mecca regarding who is in charge of Mughal empire at that moment
@@jacksparow25 not really Mughals drained wealth from India people and few elites held all the wealth They taxed Indian citizens heavily enforced jizya, foreign language, alien and barbaric culture on Indians, if they were so great why would Maratha rise in the first place It’s not the first time india was invaded but all the invader enriched Indian culture Kushan, Greeks, hunas and even Turkic Hindu shahis defended india and helped Indian culture to spread across the Silk Road they didn’t impose Farsi but used Sanskrit as a administrative language Now compare it to Mughals
During the reign of Aurangazeb India held the highest GDP in the whole world which we cannot even imagine now. We still have resources that put us there but unfortunately the politics , corruption and illiteracy is so bad now.
@@swapnaneeldas3227 people like you with hate is the problem of my country right now , I am not speaking about the Islamic history here , i am saying is that we still as Indians have the resources to put the country on the top , but trust me people like you are the reason for its downfall. . Most of the comments are literally from those learned graduates from whatsapp university. No offense intended but if we are to check our lineage and heritage as an Indian from its southern parts i can guarantee you that my heritage will more Indian than your mixed forefathers who came from north of the INdia and as Indians my forefathers had the right to follow any religion they wanted , so they chose Islam, who knows what my next generations will chose for themselves , i dont care , but at the end of the day they will have pure Indian genes though unlike yours.
@@georgeghazaryan What's strong ??? ... Yes true ... Chamkaur Sahib battle .... Battle of Saragarhi Battle of Saraighat Battle of Itkhuli Battle of Pavan Khind Siege of Purandhar Sack of Surat
Rani Mangammal of the Madurai Nayak dynasty played a key role of assisting Zulfiqar Ali Khan. The siege of Jinji, was also the longest siege by any single Mughal Army in recorded history, it lasted for a lingering 8 years.
A Chaghatai Turk, he claimed descent from both of the great Central Asian conquerors, Timur and, more remotely, Chingiz Khan. It was this connection with the great Mongol invader that gave the dynasty the misleading appellation of "Mughal" or "Mongol." This is especially ironic, since Babur himself had an intense dislike for the Mongols. While it is too late to change the long-accepted nomenclature, it is worth remembering that the Mughal dynasty was Turkish in origin, and the cultural tradition which Babur imported into India was the one which had flourished on the banks of the Oxus. Memoirs of Zehir-ed-Din Muhammed Babur, trans. by J. Leyden and W. Erskine, rev. by Sir Lucas King (2 vols.; London, 1921), provides a firsthand account of Babur's reign.
Brother, this word Mughal was first used by Britishers in their writings, in the late 18th century, that's how this name popped up and became popular in Indian History, 😅✌️.
The remains of the Moghul army had melted away, and the Moghul leaders had been slowly manoeuvred into giving Nader what he wanted. His task had been made easier by the common Turcoman/ Persian culture that the Moghuls and the invaders shared. The Moghul dynasty was originally Turkic or Turco-Mongol, descended directly from Timur himself, and for two centuries had enjoyed a refined Persian court culture. To emphasise their common origin Nader insisted that he and Mohammad Shah should speak together in the Turkic language of the peoples of Central Asia. The terms of the formal document ceding this territory, which we may take to have been directly dictated by Nader, referred again to the two monarchs’ shared Turcoman origin. It genuflected to the memory of the earlier Asiatic conquerors Timur and Genghis Khan in its mention of the family of Gurkan. In the document, Mohammad Shah said of Nader: And out of the Greatness of his Soul, and abundant humanity, in regard to the illustrious Family of Gourgan, and the Honour of the Original Tree of Turkan, [he] was graciously pleased to restore to me the Crown and Gem of Hindostan. Axworthy, M. (2006). Prologue: Zenith. In The Sword of Persia Nader Shah: From Tribal Warrior to Conquering Tyrant (pp. 1-16). London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.. In letters to Mughal and Ottoman rulers, Nädir, in a parallel way, recalled the past by appealing to his common ancestry with them." He, too, sought to establish a world empire, but one that recognized the legitimacy of the contemporary rulers of India, Iran, Central Asia, and the Ottoman Empire, because, as his letters claimed, they each represented a people (an il) that constituted a legitimate Turkic or Timürid successor to the Mongols in particular regions of the Islamic world." Astarābādī described the Mughal Emperor Muhammad Shah as being "of the Turkmän tree and the scion of the Gürkânl (i.e. Timürid] family." A letter from Nädir to the Ottoman 1129 Sultan Mahmud I addressed Mahmüd as "the world-illuminating light of the Turkmän royal house.30 Avoiding any specific definitions of these ancestral Turkic ties, Nadir appealed to them as a way to reconnect disparate Muslim realms. In its audacity, Nadir's vision resembled Timür's grandiose plans. Both tried to invent the tradition of an imagined unity that had never actually existed, and could, in any case, only be implemented anyway by glossing over irreconcilable differences. Pfeiffer, J. and Woods, J., n.d. History and historiography of post Mongol Central Asia and the Middle East. pp.338, 339.
Yo... a full 2 hours of great civilization history??? Count me in baby!!!
STONEWORKS
Stonework? I had no idea you were a based Mughal man.
Never knew you were into Mughals. Great to see you here. And yeah would love to see you back to making world building videos.
The longer the better
As an Indian Hindu, I was really ashamed of how little I knew of such an important part of our history.
I have learnt much more through this video than in all my years spent at school.
You are a compelling narrator. The two hours just flew by!
Mughals who used to kill innocent Hindus, Buddhists jain etc and rape their women are considered great and heroes by people like you. No doubt why India lost its independence because we hv people like you who pray to invaders rather than fighting against them. I m sure your ancestors must hv betrayed Bharat for their personal benefits that
@@AbhishekYadav-sc2bg Aurangzeb did that bro than Farrukh Siyar. Except these 2 non of any Mughal emperor did that
You are too good to us bro...
A 2 plus hour documentary is freaking awesome!
And on a Monday!
Thanks for your work and sharing your talent for making interesting documentarys.
Cheers!
Videos like this for the Abbasid Caliphate, the Delhi Sultanate, the Ottoman Empire, Mamluk Egypt and Safavid Persia would be amazing. I will join your patreon in hopes that you may continue to share this precious knowledge with us.
Yes, if not all, at least for the Abbasid empire
@Iam ELIAS I think the context should be kept in mind - Yes, Ottoman Empire would easily wipe out the Abbasids, but that is because they lived at a time when the entire world was richer, more populated and more advanced. Abbasids still are highly impressive, altough in relative power I think the Mughals or the Ottomans were the most powerful Muslim Empire
@Shyam Sharma most Rajputs in modern Pakistan did convert to Islam and even in Mewat which is in India
@@georgeghazaryan you are also converted but not rajput , oh no i thaught akbar produced 60cr offsprings
@@juliuszgodek6514 no they were not Abbasids were the most impressive of them all they have the most well known King and for most part of Islamic world ideas came from their times however I will give they only have been in total control for just 100 years but put to mind how many empires ruled 11 millions square KM for more than that in total control
Mughal empire eventually was too big to control. Hence, infighting started, it started with Civil wars and then Awadh, Hyderabad state and Bengal broke away. Marathas were initially able to control the Central and parts of North India, however after Battle of Panipat, they started infighting as well. Scindia with Holkar, Gaikwad with Peshwa, Nagpur had multiple civil wars. That ultimately resulted in British Control of India.
no what tipped those off was the Islamist policy of aurangzeb. The previous rulers were more or less quite secular and didnt even levy jizya. Aurangzeb bought back the hated jizya. One thing which should be understand is to rule India, you must not disturb the local hindu and dharmic culture. Mauryans, Mughals, British all followed the same policy. To rule Hindustan, you have to respect Hindu first. aurangzeb had none of that. Thats why he isnt counted within the first great 6 mughal rulers. His terrorist like rule brought about many revolts and the mughal rule was brought to an end by the Marathas
@wisewisdom7879 Its not that simple. The Mughals ruled in India longer than the British. What led to the empire's demise was that the heirs of Aurangzeb were not as capable as him to hold the realm together. The bigger the state became the better and more capable the emperor required to hold it together. The expansionism of Aurangzeb had also expended a large amount of wealth. Eventually the British even with advanced technology couldn't hold India and once the British couldn't hold it together, it broke away and pieces of it broke off (Pakistan/Bangladesh)
@@lastword8783 It also had to do with the fact or examples away from the capital for over 20 years, With him so far away from the center administration for so long various groups that were normally swapped around as Zamindars Were able to create bases of power for themselves when they normally wouldn’t have been able to.
At led to a degradation of Central control, and helped cause the empire to begin collapsing.
@wisewisdom7879 India is not like the Arab gulf or China in terms of its ethnic or linguistic composition. There is immense diversity in India which can only be compared to Europe (if Europe becomes one country, that is). With such great diversity, it is not easy at all to 'rule' over people, because there is simply no 'unity' among the people except for perhaps, a civilizational connect. We have no common religion, no common language, no common ethnicity, and so on.
Mughals attempted to first use Islamic religion AND Turkic culture to integrate people. Then with the coming of Akbar, they tried to become more secular and Persianate, and finally with Aurangzeb they attempted to impose Sharia and go Saudi Arabia-like Islamic, but none of those tactics ultimately worked beyond few years because India simply isn't meant to be 'ruled' by a single commanding power at all. (And this is when Mughals did not have control over North East India and Tamil Nadu & Kerala. imagine the chaos if the empire were any bigger).
Even in the modern day, India may have one Prime Minister but there are 28 provinces and 7 union territories with each having their own chief minister. For once, you can rule China and Arabia under one ruler. But in India, even today, it is next to impossible to do so.
@rishabhrox1 india can be ruled under one commanding power like how Mughals and Britishers did, all it needs is excellence administration. And for your kind information sharia law is only implemented on muslims, under aurangzeb alamgir it was fatawa alamgiri, non muslim have their own personal law. Jaziya is imposed on brahmins and temples who loot the lower class hindus and cam be only used either in defense sector or for the betterment of the non muslims alone. Muslims have to pay zakat which is more than jaziya.
This has to be the best documentary on the Great Mughals on the entire internet.
you're too underrated brother
th-cam.com/video/-sJ2NzNjrM0/w-d-xo.html
Baised one
Don't insult them by saying them Mughal, just review your history from colonial history, it's kind of a derogatory term for Gurkani.
I live in a small city "Rohri" in Sindh. Our Jamia Masjid still bears a stone engraved on it is "Sang e Bunyad Akbar Badshah" meaning Inaugural stone by King Akbar.
It is believed that Akbar was born in the city of Umerkot in Sindh while his father was running from one city to another.
th-cam.com/video/-sJ2NzNjrM0/w-d-xo.html
AYO MY MOM IS FROM THAT CITY TOO
@@ayeshathebanana no dp kyunki tu badsoorat hai.
@@ayeshathebanana ironically, Umerkot is the only Hindu majority district in Pakistan.
@@naveenawadhi6240 you don't have a Dp either. That is like the pot calling the kettle black.
The production quality and commentary is beyond brilliant. Deserving of 5 million views. Zabardast!
One of the best documentary I have come across covering entire mughal dynasty. Beautifully portrayed!! Indeed, it was worth spending 2 hours. Looking forward for more such historical documentry.
Katmullo given wrong history
Lmao mullah describing mullah
@@ARVINDYADAV-es6qk Mughals had hindu wives and mothers, and still you dogs will not stop calling them outsiders. If you hate them so much, destroy mughal monuments that bring in millions annually, stop eating biryani, stop using their language, stop wearing their clothes, go back to your half nakedness before the muslims came
Absolutely underrated content, Jazakallahu Khairan
th-cam.com/video/-sJ2NzNjrM0/w-d-xo.html . History of Khalid ibn al Walid ibn al Mughirah al Mazumi
Thanks a ton for this video and all your work. As an Indian and a Hindu, it's very tough to find well researched and unbiased work regarding Mughals and 7th-8th c Arab campaigns in India.
Great to see a channel from our part of the world doing this work ❤️
After the introduction of Modi's New Education Policy.. everything is filled with wrong and fake nationalistic knowledge
@@rehaanaamir so like most of muslim countries..any history before 6th century isnt given importance..you people are pathetic..you blame other countries of doing the same things that your people have been doing a long time ago
😂😂😂😂 You are a hindu? Or a converted hedu who celebrates its own death
Totally agree
Really??😂😂@Notreallyhereanymore
Amazing quality content in a shockingly underappreciated part of history. I'm seriously considering joining your patreon
as salam alaikum, from uzbekistan land of timurids
your videos always informative and well animated, thank you for your work
jazak allah khairan
Yooo 2 hours!!!
Love your amazing content!
Nader Shah’s brutal invasion was the biggest reason of collapse of Mughals
or maybe cuz of the jaziya tax on their subjects
Non Muslims who were taxed were not conscripted into the armies of Aurangzeb.
100% 👍👍 so true
After nadeer sha's invasion mughal empire dint even have atleast 25 horses🐎 elephants🐘🐘 🐫camels to fight with enemies like shikh people maratas jats🥲🥲🥲🥲 that's bitter truth nadeer sha's invasion was Devastating
I just read about this in William Dalrymple's "The Anarchy". The sack of Delhi was on a such a large scale that it truly ruined what was left of the Mughals, not just financially, but politically. However, they were in a profoundly weakened state by that point due to other factors.
I grew up in Pakistan and learned about Mughal history in grades 6 to 8, but it was only sketchy in my mind. This unbiased documentary in detail was enlightening. Thank you!!
The most crisp video on Mughals ever made ... Thank you .
Love from India! Your videos are helping a lot for upsc civil service exams preparation. Hope you make more videos on Indian history.
Do you live in Bangalore?
But also it is the most bloodiest chapter of indian history
@@dalitnahipehlehinduhu6569 true bro
@@spicybinga7469 not really, it’s no different from all the Indian empires before, all of which were probably worst as they engage in overseas piracy, looting, war mongering and slavery.
It’s more of biases rather than we want to acknowledge they were all bad.
I assume the Mughals get it harder for two reasons (1) they essentially created a South Asia concept that lasted until recent history
(2) they are Muslims which rules over non-Muslims (same can be applied to when Hindus rules over others)
@@AshenAshAshythere was no slavery in india before Islamic empires they introduced it in india.....The level of warfare was never this organised because it was between smaller kingdoms so less people died
A lot of civilians died during mughal campaigns against marathas
This is excellent. Well done and can’t wait to see what else is coming from your channel!
These types of videos are what I like. They are detailed, not based and respect both sides of thr story. Keep it up good brother! You make such exquisite documentries on muslim history 👍
Such excellent, comprehensive work!
100% love this! Lately there's been this hyper-nationalist Hindu/Indian "documentaries" that make verifiably false claims in the name of ethno-nationalists. Sure the older 20+yrs doc's done by English accented colonial apologists is just as frustrating lol. But you've seemed to have done the impossible.... accurately recount the Mughal empire's possible greatest ruler, without bashing some religion/ethnicity or raising up another. Much love man
Edit my bad the greatest golden age of the Mughal Empire*
@Netaji-The British Slayer And same goes with all the rulers of that time.
Its like
When you win:- See, How strong we were
When you loose:- See, How Cruel they were
You should made more shorts on TH-cam. They are quite simple and informative.
th-cam.com/video/-sJ2NzNjrM0/w-d-xo.html
NooooooOooooo
@@papazataklaattiranimam he ya boy
I really like your delivery sryle. I laughed a few times. It's clear you've done deep research and have formed your own opinions without letting them affect the scholastic value. Very enjoyable. New sub.
Goosebumps at 1:41:33 , as a kid when I read about mughuls the character who excited me the most was Aurangzeb , he tried his best but finally his zid took his peaceful life . I love how you analysed him and brought out the real history unlike people usually thinking he was the most cruel, and yes I am excited for the video on Sikhs .
Thak you very much for such an informational video. You just earned a subscriber
This is the quality content I subscribed to. Discovered your channel about a year ago, and loved it ever since.
This is false content 😂😂 u enjoy loving what u want to listen
@@NationalistBhartiya you act as if hindu or sikh content is un-biased. Stop day dreaming and do your own research and compare multiple sources instead of being fed up lies.
@@Nixo77 lol 😂 ☪️ can't build a single building in there homeland (except a square box 🕋) & they think they r great 😃.... In- vading loot distroying ancint temples that's wt ☪️ do.
Great video, and a great resource for information! I would love for you to a video on the history of certain cities next. The history of Lahore would be an excellent example.
Salute to your efforts.
Muslims need to present their own history so our generations don't feel ashamed because of lies and attacks of enemies.
What a fantastic video 😍 nicely done well researched 👏👏👏
It would be great if you could make a video like this for the latter half of the Mughal empire. Basically, going into detail about the empire and its rulers from 1707 until its official dissolution in 1857.
Brother can you please do video on Shahi Bangalah Sultanate. Thank you in advance from Bangladesh.
It's very sad that Shahi Bangla is forgotten and overshadowed by other regional empires when the fact is it was the most prosperous and wealthiest nation in the world
52:25 Malik Ambar helped found the city of Aurangabad, which is one of India's must-see destinations. It is near to the otherworldly and breathtaking sights of Ellora and Ajanta Hindu/Buddhist Caves as well as being a day trip away from one of India's premier natural wonders, Lonar Lake, which is a product of a meteor impact some 500,000 years ago. Aurangabad city features: a gorgeous Taj Mahal-like tomb, the extraordinary Daulatabad Fort which sits on top of a high hill with its sides shaved off to create a moat, and one of the most lively market districts I've seen in India. I spent a week here and every day was an adventure full of intrigue and discovery.
Sambhajinagar not aurangabad
its sambhiji nagar now, thanks for the info though
I visited Aurangabad as a child. I only remember the Ellora caves. Thanks for this info, will visit again and explore the sites you mention.
@@buzztube1738
Really? This trend is soooo silly. Soon they'll be renaming the Taj Mahal.
@@gnatandgnu6015 taj mahal is not an hindu Or indic building it does not belong to us aurangabad does
Спасибо огромное за ваш труд и это видео. Как раз то что я искала. ❤
I like to think I’m a Mughal myself
Who let you in here?!
@@AlMuqaddimahYT hey I came for a family reunion and now that I’m finally related to Chingghis the Yuan better watch out
@@AlMuqaddimahYT lundallah fuckurallah
@@timurthejerk9270 a typical converted who think himself son of akbar 🤣 does akbar produced 50 cr offsprings
Did somebody say jewels?
What a informative channel!!..... Keep it uo guys, wish your good luck🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐
India was rich even before Mughal.
They enforced jizya on non-muslims.
Taxashila and Nalanda Universities were in India before the Mughal.
Mughal came from deserts and barren lands of the middle East to the greenery and abundance in India.
Indian architecture was very much evolved even before Mughals.
Yes they did contribute many things but Indian civilization and history is way older than Islam itself.
Devdyuti Saha
What were you smoking?
@@amandaa3713 very cool reply.
@@75bugle They came from fergana valley and they were inspired by a pedophile to conquer the world in the name of god. I never said arabs. Get out of mindset of playing victim. Look around.
@@amandaa3713search 🔎"mauryans" "Guptas" "cholas"
Mughuls came from Middle East?? 😂😂
Holy shit. Not gonna watch this now, but I am so excited. You’ve made my night, though
dont say holy s*** it makes you non religous
@@Dark-Awusum_CR7
That’s already the case, my friend. But thanks for the heads-up
The quality of this video is just beyond belief!
Wohh these 2 hrs was superb loved it 💗 besst video on this topic in TH-cam ✨💗✌
For a balanced view its important to avoid terms like Mughals “civilised” and created a “unified India” because it implies it wasn’t already civilised. India has been unified multiple times prior to Islamic arrival and by the local Hindu Marathas. Buddhism and epics like Ramayan originated in India and spread all over Asia. South East Asian languages borrow heavily from Sanskrit and Tamil. Their written scrips are based on South Indian Brahmi script. Not to mention a lot of foundational mathematicians later built upon by Arabs in places like Baghdad occurred in early India. I know some Hindus are revisionist by saying all Muslim rule was ONLY characterised by loot but many Muslims (mainly Pakistanis and Bangladeshis) have this idea that India was always some uncivilised superstitious countries with “dirty idolaters” living in huts before Islam came along to civilise us. We have ALWAYS been a great civilisation.
I looked through my script again. I didn't use the word "civilized" at all. What video are you watching?
@@AlMuqaddimahYT not in relation to you more so people who may be commenting. Whenever there is a debate re Mughals there are commenters mainly from Pakistan who say India became civilised upon the arrival of Islam. There have been Afghans who told me that they developed India impkying that it wasn’t before. Not claiming you have said that but the general community has.
👌
Befitting reply to these radical islamic terrorists
@@leo5927 your religion are the terrorist
An insightful and engaging video that provides valuable insights on the topic. The presenter's expertise shines through, making this content truly exceptional.💯💯
Great video!! It's not easy to find videos about Indian history
Is there a bibliography or secondary sources that you would recommend, if somebody wants to go further?
Much respect
Bairam Khan was most likely the most important Mughal general except emperors themselves
Thank You but please add references so we can put such information in our answer sheets.
As a Hindu , i likes Mughal empire , it united our subcontinent and gave peace and prosperity to it. Delhi sultanate failed to do that. Common people wants peace and prosperity no matter if ruler is muslim or hindu. But Aurangjeb applied heavy taxes which leads to rebels.
Don't lie ur not a Hindu come with ur real identity Indian was in more United under mauryan empire with peace better then looters maughals
Bruh it brings me the Jewish Nazi vibes from Poland ball.
Or you are just a Sunni Muslim 🤨
@@shehzadadarashikoh9463 you will support mughals, until they plunder your Deepak nagar and rename it aurangabad, r@pe Hindu woman and killing non Hindus (including you)
Then let's see whether these central Asian predators are actually good
@@shehzadadarashikoh9463 written this comment like a resume
Aurangzeb won't kiss you for this instead he is in jahannam
@@basedtsar9440 fuc* Aurangjeb i don't care. I'm always with righteousness. I have his name because he was Most powerful and richest king ever lived. Although i don't like attachment towards people power and Money.
Excellent presentation. Subbed.
Nice video. You should do one on the travels of Ibn Battuta.
This is incredible work! 💪🏽💪🏽.
when talking about Jizya, why is it said to be done for take sake of humiliation? In Islam, Zakah (2.5% of the wealth one possesses above the nisab) was given to the poor by any Muslim that could afford it yearly. In tern it helped the economy with circulation of finance. Non Muslims did not provide Zakah. Thus non Muslim merchants were taxed so the wealth still had circulation, the non muslims had to give something to help the economy as well.Thus it can be said Jizya was taken from non Muslims in par to that, every citizen in it contributes to the empire, additionally it was only taken from a certain portion of non Muslims that had enough wealth, and it was taken to aid military in an otherwise giant empire.
India should charge tax on Muslims based on religion. 😊
Mughals are intrinsic part of our history. Under great Mughals india's borders were secure & thus it ushered in an era of peace & prosperity. We must accept our history as it is & learn from it.
Intriguing and informative overview of the rise and fall of Mughal power in India. Time flew while listening. Thanks, and looking forward to the two promised videos.
amazing content
amazing work right here!
Kohinoor 💎Diamond was in possession of various rulers, it came into possession of Kakatiyas, Alauddin Khilji, Babur, Shah Jahan, Nadir Shah, Ahmad Shah Durrani (Founder of Afghan empire), Maharaja Ranjit Singh and finally, it passed into the hands of British Monarch.
th-cam.com/video/-sJ2NzNjrM0/w-d-xo.html
All gay
@@Jm20-m thera baap ijda tha na🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ijda👏🤣🤣🤣
@@starfootball6478 a conveted try to become akbar son 😂
1:29:17 bro you got me when you said Zeus kratos and atreus have on this family
Considering that Hindutva fascists have erased this history now from textbooks in India. This video is GOLD!
No ,all of the factual history is still there
This history is also as good as erased. It tells you only half of the story.
@@preapple our country,our history🤷🏻♂️
@@swapnaneeldas3227thats not how history works 😅😅 the world will only think you are ignorant,, as they have started to realize 😢
"A Jerk" 😂😂😂
I laughed even the next day!
There are lots of false notions on Aurangzeb. Thanks for setting the image straight!
Will you do a video on the Mughals and Sikhs?
One of my former profs once said that Shah Jahan loved mangoes so much that he ate so many in one sitting that he got sick with terrible diarrhea and subsequently became terribly dehydrated, and this set off the rumors that he was on his deathbed which, in turn, caused his four sons to mobilize their forces and war against each other, with Awrangzayb being triumphant. Then Awrangzayb would so weaken the Mughal Empire in the second half of his reign in all his wars that it facilitated the Europeans getting footholds in the Indian subcontinent with England/G. Britain eventually taking over. Thus, mangoes were a cause thereof. I don't know if this is true, but it is an interesting anecdote.
I am excited to see you report on the Mughal Sikh relations and also the rise of the 10th Sikh Guru, his successor General Banda Singh Bahadur, the Sikh Misls and the Sikh Empire. Interesting times here with Persian and Afghan Invasions destabilizing Mughal hold on Punjab
Akbar taxe free sikh guru
Thanks from Uzbekistan 🇺🇿🙌
Lmao if youre the Mongols why you poor now
Islamic rule in India was a form of colonialism, characterized by the imposition of a foreign islamic culture, religion, and political system on the Indian subcontinent. Muslims were foreign invaders who came to India and imposed their Islamic faith and culture on the indigenous population. They point to examples of the destruction of Hindu temples, the imposition of Jizya tax on non-Muslims, and the forced conversions to Islam as evidence of this colonialist mindset.
LOL. Retarded points like yours only serve to peg India back in terms of its economic and social developmet, while neighboring countries like China steamrolls ahead with its economic growth thanks to zero distractions like the ones that you raise
"The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history." -- Will Durant
@@topbandit9693neither were the colonialists a single entity and were also of the same culture and were vying for power within the competition of local rulers so I don't really see ur point
So was the indo aryans
@@thomasjohan3138 The good thing about the barbarism of Islamic rule is that the savagery they are attributed with are quite believable. Thanks to what their radical fellow co-religionists proudly display. If Islam was spread using the blade of the sword on civilians is news to you, I think you were living under god knows what rock. They show their true nature and we call them a "terror organization".
Hi, your video's quality and script is too good, and the way you are presenting...
I would like to translate in Bengali language and make a video in future
Hope you will not disagree
India's population growth accelerated under the Mughal Empire, with an unprecedented economic and demographic upsurge which boosted the Indian population by 60% to 253% in 200 years during 1500-1700. The Indian population had a faster growth during the Mughal era than at any known point in Indian history prior to the Mughal era.
Death on allah
Mauryan Empire:- Am I joke to you?
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 so you mean to say population increased in Mauryan Empire? Give evidence
@@muazzamshaikh2049 The Mauryan Empire had approximately had a population of 25-30 million people at it's peak and Patliputra being the Empire's(and the world's ) largest and populated city. India has historically always been the richest place on this Planet prior to Mughals and had controlled around 35% of the world's GDP.
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 source ?
name of the music in the beginning?
Fantastic documentary. Zabardast!
Bro really dropped a 2 hour video!! Certified legend
Excellent documentary. Looking forward to the one on the Sikhs.👍👍
Excellent and informative video! I lesrned a lot!
Make a video on Tipu Sultan pls ❤️
Tipu sultan is based
@@CannedFruit999 his valour against the angrej😌😩😩
@@catanana MashaAllah
@@catanana Tipu Sultan would be interesting as he is very controversial for good reasons.
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 I know he killed Kannadigas and Marathis
Wow, really good insights; thanks!
legendary video well done
awesome video! great content in general, keep it up! if you could cover the ideologies and imperialism of more contemporary statesmen like nehru, nasser, bhutto or ecevit, that would be lit af! but to keep safe from all the trolls maybe something like the timurid court culture? the one babur grew in
2 hours of Joke😂
Just study India before 10th century and then dare to say Mughals gave anything which India haven't had before😂🙏🤡
Right
@Al Muqaddimah could you give us the reference of The zahir ud Din Babur?
The descendants of Timur who ruled in India called themselves Chaghtai Turks and looked down upon the Mughals or Mongols as half - barbarians .
Rise and Fall of the Mughal Empire, Vol 1., Ram Prasad Tripathi
Central Book Depot, 1960 p.1
The fact remains , in any case , that the people of India were accustomed to call their northern invaders Mughals , and that those invaders were for the most part both physically and mentally what are usually called Turks .
The Turks In India: Critical Chapters On The Administration Of That Country By The Chughtai, Babar, And His Descendants (1879) Paperback - April 27, 2009 by Henry George Keene (Author) p.51
Mughal is the Persian word for Mongol, but the Timurids considered themselves Turks. They were known as Mughals in the Indian subcontinent because there the term had come to designate the Turkish-speaking military elite of central Asia.
STREUSAND, D.O.U.G.L.A.S.E. (2019) Islamic gunpowder empires: Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals. ROUTLEDGE. p.202
What is the source of your information? Please drop sources of your information too 🙏❤️
I’m a subscriber but please don’t use terms like ‘jerk’ and ‘I want to piss on his grave’ for historical entities. We will ask for your opinion when we feel necessary, but till then, be humble and stick to facts. Consider this a request. Please.
it’s funny to be honest but at the same time I get what u mean
Where did he say that?
@@whatsupthesky4718 did he say that to Timur?
@@MohsinRaza-uq2ow yes he did in the timur video I thought it was funny
@@Deepak_Dhakad I’m sure you’ve never had the melons of Samarkand, else you would be saying the same thing. They say Babur used to cry for it
Can you do the same with Abbasid Chaliphate
Extremely insightful, except for the part where you criticise jizya for non Muslims because Muslims too had to practice giving zakat which more often than not were more costly than jizya. Not to mention majority of the general population had income less than what is needed to pay jizya.
Taxing someone to pay one part of the earning for Donation cant be compared with taxing someone just because he is of different religion.
Jaziya is criticized not majorly because of its economic Impact, but because of its Psychological Impact where you are taxing all other people who are from other religion, a kind of soft force for conversion too. & even worse than Jaziya was the Pilgrimage Tax.
Zakat is higher than jizya.
@@m.aryaanamiri2755zakat is only for poor muslim help. No one else. Whereas, poor hindu,sikh,jain had to pay jizya and not received any zakat.
@@ujjalkumar3518 where did you get that?Zakat is for poor people in general,regardless of religion.Do some research before larping.
@@ujjalkumar3518
There is no zakat, not only for the poor, but also for soldiers, travellers, poor people and slaves.
1:49:25
You are wrong.. Aurangzeb are not deemed unlegitimate accorfing yo Islamic rule
It is more matters of intrrnal Mughal suvcession.
Despite the Shariff of Mecca didnt accept his tributes earlier, it is because there is limited information from Shariff of Mecca regarding who is in charge of Mughal empire at that moment
Before Mughals, India's share of World's GDP was 33%. After 200 years of their arrival, the number was 25%. That sums up the contribution of Mughals.
Dont take him seriously he whitewashes Islamic history
Prove it.
@@jacksparow25 a simple google search will prove it
But if you want sources read the works of Historical economist
@@Saint.Topman a simple google sech will also prove that the mughals were one of the best rulers that india ever had.
@@jacksparow25 not really Mughals drained wealth from India people and few elites held all the wealth
They taxed Indian citizens heavily enforced jizya, foreign language, alien and barbaric culture on Indians, if they were so great why would Maratha rise in the first place
It’s not the first time india was invaded but all the invader enriched Indian culture Kushan, Greeks, hunas and even Turkic Hindu shahis defended india and helped Indian culture to spread across the Silk Road they didn’t impose Farsi but used Sanskrit as a administrative language
Now compare it to Mughals
Can you cover delhi sultanate and ancient India before 1 AD as well ??
During the reign of Aurangazeb India held the highest GDP in the whole world which we cannot even imagine now. We still have resources that put us there but unfortunately the politics , corruption and illiteracy is so bad now.
Aurengzeb has also been observed as most religiously intolerant ruler. He spent most of Mughal money in wars and implementing bigoted policies.
@@Enigmasuhail we had a lot of things even before you guys,stop trying to make islamic history the only important thing in India
@@swapnaneeldas3227 people like you with hate is the problem of my country right now , I am not speaking about the Islamic history here , i am saying is that we still as Indians have the resources to put the country on the top , but trust me people like you are the reason for its downfall.
. Most of the comments are literally from those learned graduates from whatsapp university.
No offense intended but if we are to check our lineage and heritage as an Indian from its southern parts i can guarantee you that my heritage will more Indian than your mixed forefathers who came from north of the INdia and as Indians my forefathers had the right to follow any religion they wanted , so they chose Islam, who knows what my next generations will chose for themselves , i dont care , but at the end of the day they will have pure Indian genes though unlike yours.
Your videos are helping me a lot….thank you 👏🏻👏🏻
So we Waite for the next part with the Sikhs ?
Would help if you made one about the Bengal Sultanate or Malay Sultanates.
Great One 🙂
What Programm do you use?
What a joke 😂
Transformed India to what it is today😂😂😂
2 hours? How long does it take to edit?
Then who burnt the books in nalanda and destroyed many temples all across India ?
Muhammad ghori wasn't a mughal
Idiot. Can't see history as it is, Always bring Religion in it. Not all Muslim rulers were Mughals stupid arss
Aint no way this is 2 hours... amazing
Awesome explanation brother. Love it🥰
Complete the whole documentary without any টানাটানি😅।
🌙 Take love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
Great heroes for one community and absolute meaning of evil for the other
True
strong will always win over weak. cope with it.
@@georgeghazaryan What's strong ??? ...
Yes true ...
Chamkaur Sahib battle ....
Battle of Saragarhi
Battle of Saraighat
Battle of Itkhuli
Battle of Pavan Khind
Siege of Purandhar
Sack of Surat
@@75bugle conveted try to become akbar son 🤣
@@rdx706 lmao
Rani Mangammal of the Madurai Nayak dynasty played a key role of assisting Zulfiqar Ali Khan.
The siege of Jinji, was also the longest siege by any single Mughal Army in recorded history, it lasted for a lingering 8 years.
th-cam.com/video/-sJ2NzNjrM0/w-d-xo.html
they didn’t speak turkish they spoke chagatai turkic.
A Chaghatai Turk, he claimed descent from both of the great Central Asian conquerors, Timur and, more remotely, Chingiz Khan. It was this connection with the great Mongol invader that gave the dynasty the misleading appellation of "Mughal" or "Mongol." This is especially ironic, since Babur himself had an intense dislike for the Mongols. While it is too late to change the long-accepted nomenclature, it is worth remembering that the Mughal dynasty was Turkish in origin, and the cultural tradition which Babur imported into India was the one which had flourished on the banks of the Oxus.
Memoirs of Zehir-ed-Din Muhammed Babur, trans. by J. Leyden and W. Erskine, rev. by Sir Lucas King (2 vols.; London, 1921), provides a firsthand account of Babur's reign.
Brother, this word Mughal was first used by Britishers in their writings, in the late 18th century, that's how this name popped up and became popular in Indian History, 😅✌️.
The documentary was brief and easy to understand as history includes a lot of details u just get the gist from the history. Love it
The remains of the Moghul army had melted away, and the Moghul leaders had been slowly manoeuvred into giving Nader what he wanted. His task had been made easier by the common Turcoman/ Persian culture that the Moghuls and the invaders shared. The Moghul dynasty was originally Turkic or Turco-Mongol, descended directly from Timur himself, and for two centuries had enjoyed a refined Persian court culture. To emphasise their common origin Nader insisted that he and Mohammad Shah should speak together in the Turkic language of the peoples of Central Asia.
The terms of the formal document ceding this territory, which we may take to have been directly dictated by Nader, referred again to the two monarchs’ shared Turcoman origin. It genuflected to the memory of the earlier Asiatic conquerors Timur and Genghis Khan in its mention of the family of Gurkan. In the document, Mohammad Shah said of Nader:
And out of the Greatness of his Soul, and abundant humanity, in regard to the illustrious Family of Gourgan, and the Honour of the Original Tree of Turkan, [he] was graciously pleased to restore to me the Crown and Gem of Hindostan.
Axworthy, M. (2006). Prologue: Zenith. In The Sword of Persia Nader Shah: From Tribal Warrior to Conquering Tyrant (pp. 1-16). London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd..
In letters to Mughal and Ottoman rulers, Nädir, in a parallel way, recalled the past by appealing to his common ancestry with them." He, too, sought to establish a world empire, but one that recognized the legitimacy of the contemporary rulers of India, Iran, Central Asia, and the Ottoman Empire, because, as his letters claimed, they each represented a people (an il) that constituted a legitimate Turkic or Timürid successor to the Mongols in particular regions of the Islamic world." Astarābādī described the Mughal Emperor Muhammad Shah as being "of the Turkmän tree and the scion of the Gürkânl (i.e. Timürid] family." A letter from Nädir to the Ottoman 1129 Sultan Mahmud I addressed Mahmüd as "the world-illuminating light of the Turkmän royal house.30 Avoiding any specific definitions of these ancestral Turkic ties, Nadir appealed to them as a way to reconnect disparate Muslim realms. In its audacity, Nadir's vision resembled Timür's grandiose plans. Both tried to invent the tradition of an imagined unity that had never actually existed, and could, in any case, only be implemented anyway by glossing over irreconcilable differences.
Pfeiffer, J. and Woods, J., n.d. History and historiography of post Mongol Central Asia and the Middle East. pp.338, 339.