Has Prince Harry been taking tips from Post Office lawyers?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- Dodgy Disclosure and Limitation Liabilities. And Watergate.
#artoflaw #princeharry #postoffice
Disclaimer: Neither this nor any other video, may be taken as legal advice. I accept no liability whatever for any reliance placed upon it.
Founded by Alan Robertshaw and @Blackbeltbarrister
th-cam.com/users/bl...
How can he compare himself to the awful situation that those falsely accused went through, Harry is all about money, and being in a perpetual state of victimhood.
Cheers Al, great video. Thank you 👍🏼
Beautiful location ❤
Fancourt was very lenient to let this case in in the first place as it WAS out f time.
This court has already been far too lenient on this buffoon!
Alan, how many times a day do you have to ‘Bite your lip’ & actually not ‘call a spade a spade’, but use a euphemism instead? You explain things so eloquently, in a northern accent, that I could listen to all day. Thanks for being so ‘natural’.
Thanks for the clarification on H's case. It has cleared up my questions about it.
Harry has been fully aware of what was going on as William got his payout and gave Harry the money.
William gave his payout to charity.
@@alayneperrott9693 yes to Harry for the Invictus games
@@bridiesmith5110 the Invictus games aren't Harry. (or the Harpie). As much as they'd like us to think so..
Can the judge order Harry to get the messages/emails from his ghost writer, or can the newspaper subpoena the ghost writer for the messages/email?
The judge has the chance to prove money doesn't buy judgements. Where are you exactly, glorious scenery.
The judge was clearly unimpressed.
It will interesting to see what rationale the Prince provides for the deleted correspondence, and how Justice Fancourt responds.
I have something in common with a Judge, it seems...?!! I am singularly unimpressed with (I hate having to address him thus...cough...) Prince Harry... (I'd rather call him by his first name: Henry, if only because he said back in the early days of his defecting... "Call me Harry") ... So, Henry, you're a 'plank...thick, two by two, wooden, and, to be honest*, wormy' and _that's_ _about as good a compliment as I can offer him_ 🤔🏴♥️🇬🇧🙂🖖
(*"Honest", lol, not a word easily, or often applicable regarding Prince Henry, aggravating manchild that he is).
Good morning to you. Sunshine and Sea, marvellous! Most interesting information as usual. Glad to know about the Dashcam/Disclosure thing. As always, thank you. 😊.
H is a Loser
Observing the rulings on both Harry and Meghan's court cases, in my opinion, the judges have been extremely lenient. In my opinion, Harry is still being given preferential treatment with a merely superficial attempt to demonstrate the pretense of justice. It seems strange that they even allowed him to go forward with this case to begin with. Are they stretching the rules to accommodate the errant prince? Just asking.
In Meghan's case that she won, mostly on a point of law, ie TOO MANY WORDS printed\thus a breach of her copy right of her letter to her father, known as the ''dear daddy'' letter, which she c.c. five friends (believed not to exist) of which extracts were published in America print, to which her father responded via the British press, she refused to name those names. It was interesting that she to had lost information and refused to give to the judge & had committed perjury, constantly prevaricated & asking (demanding) summary judgements. And along comes Harry !! doing exactly the same. Always keep in mind David Sherbourne represented the estate of Diana, Princess of Wales, I think commissioned by the Spencer family at the Leveson inquiry - Sherbourne knows were the bodies are buried and probably a lot of the redacted information.
Harry should take the hint and just sod off
Can I just say how nice it is to see so many of the Cornish views you seek out as amazing back drops to your interesting and informative videos
Fabulous backdrop. Brilliant comprehensive content. Very enjoyable listening. G Ire
He's a disgrace
Red and Dread are quickly becoming the most despised couple on the planet.
Not becoming the most despised people on the planet. They already are
I do not find words to say how you have built me up. Have a foreign succesion case going, hereditary proceedings at home, complicated rental things that tie in with the above, plus a cold case involving art works rooted in Cold War contexts. Your comment pertains to altogether different issues and circumstances, but has given me invaluable insight, hope, inspiration and fuel. Free of charge, at that! Kudos, kudos, kudos. The Nixon thread I especially appreciate...
Will the judge be even more surprised the hard drives have turned up?
But are they the original hard drives?
@@kaxar6954 Exactly!
@@kaxar6954 The forensic tech bofs should be able tell.
Fraud and breach of trust you have 10 years and personal injury only two years to bring a claim. Money before people. You made my day when you said you could not remember how to spell your middle name and you spell things wrong. I am always being picked up in comments for my bad spelling.
You’ve got a thousand years of case law over there with some extremely specific rules, it’s fascinating. My country isn’t even 250 yet. ;-)
Hapless Hawwy was hacked even before he had a mobile phone. He's that special.
Great information, and I do hope the judge calls out misdeeds. I expect him to treat Harry as he would a common person and provide judgement based based on facts presented (or not presented). Time for Harry to face reality....
Given that Henry has decided he is a private citizen, he should be treated like any private citizen
Ooh Al, I’m suffering with location envy!
I've been waiting for you Al...
(BTW my son is starting to be called up as an expert witness and I will be sending your links to him...)
Heh yer I can't spell my middle name either. Dyslexics of the world untie lol
I think judges get very fed of with serial litigants too
This is really interesting and very well explained for this lay person!
I wish I was sitting there getting the sea air and the sun's rays.
Thank you for this edition.
Thanks for explaining this ,love the place you're at
Doing time in the Clink: I don't think he'll be put in the CLINK, only because of his connections to his former family; whom he's thrown under the bus, redicule, p..ed all over; but he may end up with a hefty fine, probably in the millions, to pay the courts and Newspaper.
Just my thoughts and opinions expressed on what I hear and read in the media!
I really hope so! (Either will suffice)
The dog ate Harry's emails and texts.
Well if he has he's on a loser.
I really enjoy your TH-cam, thank you. Question on the Post Office, being a Public Inquiry do you know if the witnesses who are given a self-incrimination warning by Sir Wyn prior to giving their evidence and have legal representation at the inquiry are they responsible for their legal fees or are the fees paid for by the inquiry. Thank you.
What about people who systematically delete communications after a year (or whatever)? Or just don't save texts and emails when they switch to a new phone (and wipe the old one before disposal for security reasons)? When data storage was much more expensive than now, any email in my inbox that I hadn't filed elsewhere for future reference got deleted, because I had limited space in my inbox.
I know of organisations that delete old documents regularly as part of the normal course of business. Only documents that are known to be important get kept.
I know that financial records that could be relevant to tax need to be kept for seven? years, but what about other things? Should we keep communications just in case we get involved in a lawsuit?
I like that you manage to fairly criticise a person who is reviled elsewhere on YT, and maintain your balance. I think Harry is ill-advised, and should have gone about things a very different way.
i love Mr. Justice Fancourt, but let's face it, if he doesn't throw Harry in the Brig, he will be a Law Lord this time next year.Things like that just tend to happen to legal gentlemen who do that brat a good turn.
The post office lawyers certainly DID understand the disclosure rules but they chose to hide evidence from the other side.
Hope your middle name isn't a password! 😂
Sorry to a bit of silly question and I haven't watch much on this. How does the Judge or the opposite side know there is more possible information that should be submitted
I think, the newspapers are suggesting Harry knew that he had been hacked due to something written in his book. At least, something like thar, meaning Harry should have sued within the 6 year time frame which he is now outside of.
Case is on the horizon 😂
Thank you very much for clearing up some grey areas in this case.
Thank you.
A hypothetical here. If I was in a plane crash and in a coma for two years and two days, would I have no redress?
That would be a reason for overriding the limitation period. There have actually been cases.
@@artmedialaw Thank you!
Regarding Tim Parker (POL Chairman) not sharing the Swift Report on Horizon with the POL board, I'd argue that legal privilege applies to the relationship between counsel & the client (the Post Office), meaning that the Swift Report could legitimately be shared with the PO Board & PO executive management who could be considered part of "the controlling mind" of the company. Counsel were negligent in not explaining the meaning, consequences & impact of client/ solicitor privilege and Parker was negligent in not asking any questions if he did not understand what counsel were saying. Bear in mind, privilege can be waived...it's not generally in a client's interests to do so, but they have the right to waive it if they wish.
I love your background scenery .just beautiful.
Do you think the post office people will ever end up in court over their lies ?
It's bit different in the US. Sometimes we have where a certain jurisdiction that will let you sue when they give a window for to allow for lawsuits like you mentioned. Also, I have a friend who is an OB doctor. She can be sued up to 18 years after the child is born. This allows a child or their parents to sue in case a child was injured or something else happened that the doctor could be held responsible for.
Fun Fact: Nixon recorded everything because he was told he couldn't get a tax deduction on his suits but could get one if he used a recorder for business purposes. So basically he was a cheap bastard. We do know he got caught cheating on his taxs. I found this out when I read a book about Nixon. The reason he was pardoned was because he threatened suicide by walking into the ocean. His daughter called Ford to beg him to pardon her dad.
Hello i have some awards for the royals Harry hard worker❤ Charles he's jealous Camilla is a cheater kate is a liar William is laxy love those awards.😂😂😂
Thank you for the clear explanation!
I found this video they informative 😊
Harry will fall from his
OWN GAME .
Your awesome.
Thanks!
H and M are two greedy people 😢
Harrys 🔥😂😂😂
Very interesting. I've been following the Post Office Inquiry and this is useful background. Seems like the PO knew what they were doing and have all forgotten what they did and said now.
Thank you sir, that was extremely informative, I know now my plan to slap the defendants with an 244 requesting an unless order when I submit my 208 is the way to go to get their defence struck off unless they disclose with acknowledgement.
Trying to serve an Anton Pillar order can be very tricky.
Yeah. I have some ex forces buddies who specialise in that. Just in case it kicks off.
@@artmedialaw That sounds very useful.
Yeah, that was vaguely a pretty coastal video. Heh
Very interesting. Thank you
Hazzie will take advice from a lawyer that has a outhouse for a office , a outhouse for those who don't know what it is it's a place in the woods that can 💩 and be protected from the elements and wildlife. Be careful on how you sit on them you could get splinters if you're not careful, I grew up using one its tricky on getting seated. Ouch. The only thing I hated was the flies 🤢🤮😖 .
@Cyan Kirkpatrick We didn’t have flies in ours .. just a couple of large spiders 😅
@@jgfreer8322 The outhouse in question was my aunt's and 😖😲🤯 I respect the spider.
@@cyankirkpatrick5194😂👍🕷️👀
HENRY was hiding things from his own lawyer
💤💤💤💤💤👎
get a life
Let's all bash the Harry! You never go on about Andrew in the same way. What ever you perceive as Harry's wrong doings, you must agree they are nowhere near as bad as Andrew. And yet you say nothing. Why? I am no fan of Harry, but I never seen the point of this obsessive Harry bashing. There is alot worse things going on.
At no point did he bash Harry. He is simply explaining the legal process about Harry's current court case happenings, and I, like many commentators here, find it most interesting, having the law explained in easy to understand language. He even brought up various examples of other cases and also said 'I am not suggesting Harry has done anything untoward...'. I am sure he would do the same if Andrew has dealings with the court. Why are you even listening to this, considering your views?
I do not think it has been firmly established that Andrew is guilty of anything more than monumental stupidity. He has never engaged in litigation and he has not snivelled about his familiy.
@@highmyope-ps2bythis is correct. The "settlement" was the "we disagree with you but if you want money to settle this, here you go" kind of settlement. As far as I can tell her guilty by association and as said, monumental stupidity.
@@gudrunclarke4976 he compared PO with Harry. Ridiculous.
@@highmyope-ps2by utterly ridiculous.