That's cool man. I created things to collate my own thoughts, and then everything got splattered with others saying this relates to this thinker or other. This is my notebook, and discussion forum. Some philosophers I'd never heard of before but this is happenening.
I think Schopenhauer video and the person is more to my liking. From others and talking I can make another video on Wittgenstein between the different phases as it does seem popular. Like a deep-dive on the deep-dive.
AI-Assisted. I use AI to analyse the texts and generate the voices. I have the ability to analyse the corpus and get it to focus on particular aspects. From speaking to someone else they were saying that Wittgenstein would be better if it separated his earlier work from his latter work, as this summary seems to present them more as a coherent whole. I can make a part 2 if you need.
I am very interested in this very topic and have researched these concepts myself for quite a while now. This video, and possibly channel, simply seems to be 2 AI entities discussing philosophy. You can have these kinds of interactions yourself with a competent AI entity. I have not engaged 2 AI entities in such a fashion, but that appears to be what this is and it is very easy to achieve. Very interesting and educational as well, depending on your topics of choice. I would encourage anyone who enjoys this type of content to try having these sorts of discussions yourself. Thanks for the upload. On point for me right now.
@@Mike-yt4jq There is some time that goes into curating the works, and guiding the discussion with the right questions but yes there seems to be some chain of thought with the two AI entities. The other thing I experimented (but not on TH-cam) was with a consortium of AI's that view the same issue from a variety of different perspectives until they reach consensus. I may try it here once I reach a 100 different thinkers then get them to together like a kind of perrenial philosophy.
thanks youtube algo for bringing me here
That's cool man. I created things to collate my own thoughts, and then everything got splattered with others saying this relates to this thinker or other. This is my notebook, and discussion forum. Some philosophers I'd never heard of before but this is happenening.
I think Schopenhauer video and the person is more to my liking. From others and talking I can make another video on Wittgenstein between the different phases as it does seem popular. Like a deep-dive on the deep-dive.
The idea of the self as a relative perspective is developed in Pirandello's vertiginous novel "One, No One and One Hundred Thousand".
Very interesting. Just read the Wikipedia entry on the book. I might look into this a little more deeply when I get the time.
Really interesting, thank you. But why does the conversation sound so fake... or rehearsed?
Sorry about that. I should've read below first. Understood now 👍
This video makes NPR sound sassy
I haven't listened to NPR, but I'm assuming you mean the presenters are tame and inoffensive.
This is AI
AI-assisted. I already explained in previous comments.
What kind of channel is this? Is it AI generated?
AI-Assisted. I use AI to analyse the texts and generate the voices. I have the ability to analyse the corpus and get it to focus on particular aspects. From speaking to someone else they were saying that Wittgenstein would be better if it separated his earlier work from his latter work, as this summary seems to present them more as a coherent whole. I can make a part 2 if you need.
So I choose writers that I have read, or am interested in getting an overview of, or from requests from subscribers.
this is great. Thanks for sharing
I am very interested in this very topic and have researched these concepts myself for quite a while now. This video, and possibly channel, simply seems to be 2 AI entities discussing philosophy. You can have these kinds of interactions yourself with a competent AI entity. I have not engaged 2 AI entities in such a fashion, but that appears to be what this is and it is very easy to achieve. Very interesting and educational as well, depending on your topics of choice. I would encourage anyone who enjoys this type of content to try having these sorts of discussions yourself. Thanks for the upload. On point for me right now.
@@Mike-yt4jq There is some time that goes into curating the works, and guiding the discussion with the right questions but yes there seems to be some chain of thought with the two AI entities. The other thing I experimented (but not on TH-cam) was with a consortium of AI's that view the same issue from a variety of different perspectives until they reach consensus. I may try it here once I reach a 100 different thinkers then get them to together like a kind of perrenial philosophy.