Sure, go for it. I would like to see some empirical testing, please. I have print a handful of NinjaFlex (TPU) nubs onto a PLA block ( 40x50x20mm PLA, pause to change filament, print the 10mm tall flexible nubs ), and they seem to adhere/bond pretty well - well, haven't fallen off. It is used for a gate bump-stop. This info is anecdotal obviously.
I'd be interested in exploring this as a bed-adhesion hack for some difficult materials. Just make the bottom of the part out of TPU and interlock it with Nylon or something.
it would work, but at the moment the interlock only works if the materials share a layer at some point (which could be made to work). The paper actually proposed a solution to that with a 3d interlock pattern, so it might be implemented in the future I guess!
I've been doing this for years by using PLA tree supports for the first 8mm of height, then printing the object in e.g. ABS from the last layer onwards. The two materials interlock with each other and prevents any warping. It means you don't need a heated bed and works with any two thermoplastics.
I've always thought of multi-material printers as something that'd be neat to have but just not worth the extra cost, but this seems like a legitimately great use-case for one! I could definitely see a lot of ways I could integrate this technique into my designs if my printer had that capability.
This is the VERY reason the Prusa XL is going to be a HUGE game changer in printing.. the fast multi tool head switching between materials, and this interlocking ability (assuming Prusa/Super add this code).. will allow a variety of materials to be combined in ways never before possible. What would be fantastic is if you could try this with PETG and TPU, as well as ABS and TPU, and CF/Nylon and TPU. I am really curious with things like phone cases.. that currently usually come with a rubber and plastic layers.. would be done better with this fusing process as a single piece that is even more durable, as an example. I'd even ask that you do a video showing some sort of phone case with TPU + PLA, PETG, ABS and CF/Nylon combinations and see how it turns out.
@@LostInTech3D Oh man.. couldn't have said it better. Cancelled my Bambu order because of the insanely long filament and purge change times and waste of filament. Multi color is cool.. but not that cool. Tool head changers in the CNC world are a huge game changer.. and they will be for 3D printing for those willing to pay the extra money to have them. I would imagine a lot of print farms would want to upgrade to multi head printers just for the amount of business it could bring in once people are able to do what you talk about in this video.. and who knows what else! Still don't get the super long filament change stuff the AMS does as something people want.
I think the interesting part of this change is that it increases the attractiveness of IDEX printers, which up to now have been a step up in cost that has been needing a justification - the fact that the adhesion strength between different materials is poor has been a known fact, and if you've had to design in features to take this into account it raises the question why not just design your object so the parts can be printed seperately and then bonded together. By getting the slicer to do this, it makes the IDEX printer a more automatic choice. Because being frank, most IDEX printers these days are just used to print 2 colours of the same material, which is a waste of their potential.
Yes. If you depart from two of the same material then it requires the design to include some form of interlocking, which in turn requires a significant investment of time. Add that slicers put walls around each material and it’s just a headache. This looks like a sensible approach.
I have two IDEX printers thinking I might need to print supports with one material and the part with another. I confess I have not used it that way. I cannot even be bothered to print 2 color models with it. More commonly, I have PLA filament loaded in one extruder, and PETG in the other, and I don't have to fool with loading and unloading so often. But this concept is very interesting and worth thinking upon. Also increases the importance of having 3D CAD that you are familiar with using.
on the dual extruder making alternate lines, I would have thought a lot of the joining materials could just be dual extruded at the same time so what was coming out the extruder was a 50'50 mix of materials. I suppose this is better overall for widely different temperature materials.
Finally multi headed printers have an actual use, woohoo! Might actually think about getting one now, otherwise there was no benefit to them (heavier/slower/twice the things to snag on your part/less reliable/typically worse part cooling), but now you can actually use more than 1 material. I might have to make my 6th printer a duel head now that something like that would be useful.
This is exactly why I decided to go with the Prusa XL and with two toolheads. Multi-material (not just multi-color) printing is what separates the top-tier printers when it comes to functional prints.
Awesome information. I use the lulzbot cura for the laz pro ( I don’t think they are doing anymore updates on it so I’ll have to see how to switch over to this cura)
I imagine you could adjust the flexability/stiffnes. Like if some of the harder material lines are set to be longer into the softer material. A density adjustment.
PLA and HIPS seam to stick together pretty well, and PETG and TPU bond well, from my experience any way.... just incase this info comes in handy to any one....
Could a variation on this be used to "crossfade" between two different materials, and have the properties of the materials change gradually across the piece?
"It might not seem that interesting as a headline feature" Me, looking up from the tab I'd opened partway through the video to browse multifilament printers for the first time in my life: "...oh?"
I upgraded my Ender 3 to do 2 filaments, so I'll be trying this. Last time I checked, multi-materials in Cura sucked. Is the octopus piece like 10 pieces, or one? I switched over to PrusaSlicer for my multi-color/material work. You can just select areas on a body and recolor them. Either with a paintbrush or fill tool. When you do those, they extend the second color/material well into the other, so they'll have a good firm bond. A good bond like we're seeing here, except I didn't see an option to specify the joint area details. This is good though, both tools are great, and I would have liked to keep using Cura.
I was on the fence when getting a second printer for my GF's place between the Sovol SV04 and the SV06. Absurdly low sale price on the SV06 won me over, given the intermittent use case of the machine, but this new feature makes me regret it a bit.
Hm, could this be used to reinforce a warp-prone material with "fibers" of a less warpy material to make it come out straight where it would otherwise warp?
Not related to the topic comment- I noticed you don’t use “infill line direction” function in Cura. Change infill type to triangles then put [30, 60] in infill direction. You will be surprised how strong a the print is with this setting on.
..also, stamps ;) There should be more possibilities for stamps with this feature. That octopusy thingy, does it do anything apart from mesmerizing animations? Does it latch to the surfaces?
I just got a printer and am using the Creality slicer. Not too sure how to use it yet, I just figured out how to remove the "skirt" layers and rotate a model to lay flat. I was concerned about Cura "knowing how" to slice models for my Ender S1 Pro. Should I just ditch the Creality slicer and use Cura? Is the Prusa slicer better for me? Not sure which direction to go or if I should stay with the Creality slicer. Just FYI I use Octoprint on a Raspberry Pi to run my printer and send files to it wirelessly rather than transferring files with an SD card or USB.
yes just use cura, it will fully support the ender 3 S1 pro. Creality slicer is in fact just an older cura. For octoprint, there's a plugin in cura to send automatically too.
I installed it for 2 minutes then realised I can't set my first layer temp to anything above or below my printing temp, the small layer temp setting under "cooling" that they just added broke all my profiles. Using Prusa slicer till it's fixed and until they fix seams too even though it's far slower with comparable settings. They (seams) have been awful since aracne was released.
I am in the "privileged" group of people who have a multi material printer, I wish I had a FUNCTIONING multi material printer though. I thought I read in the notes that this release does not include the improved tree supports from the alpha.
This is fantastic, but before it gets mainstream we need to solve the nozzle problem. Takes too long to switch between materials. I have ideas but not enough skills to implement 😅 need to learn to code 😛
I am about to buy an X1 Carbon and AMS, its a pity it doesent run Marlin although I dont think it will be long before Bambu Lab implements this feature as its been out for 3 months already!
Would definitely work for some stuff but imo tpu is one of the main materials one would want to use in multi material prints and unfortunately the bambu ams doesn't work with tpu.
ok this is a verry cool feature. but important question. does it finally do this for bridging now aswel? or does cura still suck? last time i have printed something (quite a while ago) bridging was still done like printing is magic. no overlap what so ever. expecting a large bridge to adhear to 1 or 2 WALLS. not even entering the infil or whatever. if you had any sort of linear advance then bridges just didn't work because it stops extruding before the end of a move.
@@LostInTech3D nope, there's no official support for any slicer besides bambu studio; the only community profile for cura I've seen is maybe three weeks old, doesn't have support for most of the printer's features, and carries a risk of crashing your bed into the bottom of the printer 😅
I think it's awesome, now people Lan do much more awesome stuff in 3d printing than before and that's only by new software development and no need for more special 3d printers to buy. 🤔👍
This really makes me want a multi material printer. I did some experiments with switching between PLA and TPU and was pretty happy with it but adhesion was imperfect so I added some simple ledges. I think the biggest impact of this will be in letting designers tweak their designs repeatedly without needing to redo fancy dovetails joints. I’m imagining what it would be like to design a compact hinge, and then decide to change its shape and have to redo a dovetail over and over.
Not something I'll ever need I think, despite having a dual extruder on my A10M. When Cura integrates arc overhangs as Prusia now does, or uses conical slicing or non planar slicing, then I'll get excited.
But how do you create a file to take advantage of this feature? I am using Fusion and every time I create the file when I put it in Cura with that feature it just slices it as one material. I could really use some help.
Basically a version of this forum.snapmaker.com/t/step-by-step-creating-a-two-color-snapmaker-print-from-fusion-360-to-luban-with-the-dual-extruder/30351
PCBWay ahs awesome prices for things like CNC machining and metal 3D printing. The killer is shipping to the US. I quoted a small bracket I designed to mount a Hemera Revo XS to my Ender 3 V2 and it was like $40 for the bracket and almost $70 to ship to the US. LOL no.
Hey Will, thx so much for bringing this to our attention. May we know which kind of shipping option you choosed? There are some economical options you may try: EMS, FedEx-IP, etc
"pictures for those of us who are allergic to equations" - equations are pictures too, just very confusing ones. I prefer pictures I can comprehend though...
I saw Geeetech A10M listed there and thought, "gee, I wish my printer worked more than 5 minutes in multi material mode." It always clogs. It has a single combining head and the design of it is extremely flawed. I've never had it work well at all.
I'm not keen on melding together different materials. It's exactly the sort of thing which Apple does, making product impossible to repair or recycle. There's almost always a better way to fix together parts securely but not permanently.
...do you want me to try to test the bond strength of TPU to PLA? 🙂
Yes!
Sure, go for it. I would like to see some empirical testing, please.
I have print a handful of NinjaFlex (TPU) nubs onto a PLA block ( 40x50x20mm PLA, pause to change filament, print the 10mm tall flexible nubs ), and they seem to adhere/bond pretty well - well, haven't fallen off. It is used for a gate bump-stop. This info is anecdotal obviously.
Yes let's see what it is
How is that sv04 going for?
"No youtubers were harmed in making this episode".
I'd be interested in exploring this as a bed-adhesion hack for some difficult materials. Just make the bottom of the part out of TPU and interlock it with Nylon or something.
it would work, but at the moment the interlock only works if the materials share a layer at some point (which could be made to work). The paper actually proposed a solution to that with a 3d interlock pattern, so it might be implemented in the future I guess!
I've been doing this for years by using PLA tree supports for the first 8mm of height, then printing the object in e.g. ABS from the last layer onwards. The two materials interlock with each other and prevents any warping. It means you don't need a heated bed and works with any two thermoplastics.
This makes me want a multi material printer more then I ever have before. It's a very clever idea.
Bambu P1P with the AMS system, only $950
Only? Try a tronxy
I forsee this, or something similar showing up in Prusa Slicer around the time the XL multi head printers start shipping. I love open source projects.
haha probably
I've always thought of multi-material printers as something that'd be neat to have but just not worth the extra cost, but this seems like a legitimately great use-case for one! I could definitely see a lot of ways I could integrate this technique into my designs if my printer had that capability.
yeah this is why I want to see more idexy toolchangers etc out there on the market, get more people into true multimaterial
this could dramatically change the ideas I had about products..really really interesting.
First time I wish I had a multicolour printer 😍
This could be, dare I say, revolutionary. Thanks.
This is the VERY reason the Prusa XL is going to be a HUGE game changer in printing.. the fast multi tool head switching between materials, and this interlocking ability (assuming Prusa/Super add this code).. will allow a variety of materials to be combined in ways never before possible. What would be fantastic is if you could try this with PETG and TPU, as well as ABS and TPU, and CF/Nylon and TPU. I am really curious with things like phone cases.. that currently usually come with a rubber and plastic layers.. would be done better with this fusing process as a single piece that is even more durable, as an example. I'd even ask that you do a video showing some sort of phone case with TPU + PLA, PETG, ABS and CF/Nylon combinations and see how it turns out.
Yes, I agree, and I hope it takes us into a new era of toolchangers instead of this current purge mentality
@@LostInTech3D Oh man.. couldn't have said it better. Cancelled my Bambu order because of the insanely long filament and purge change times and waste of filament. Multi color is cool.. but not that cool. Tool head changers in the CNC world are a huge game changer.. and they will be for 3D printing for those willing to pay the extra money to have them. I would imagine a lot of print farms would want to upgrade to multi head printers just for the amount of business it could bring in once people are able to do what you talk about in this video.. and who knows what else! Still don't get the super long filament change stuff the AMS does as something people want.
Even if they don't, it's not as if Cura doesn't work for Prusa printers 😎
I think the interesting part of this change is that it increases the attractiveness of IDEX printers, which up to now have been a step up in cost that has been needing a justification - the fact that the adhesion strength between different materials is poor has been a known fact, and if you've had to design in features to take this into account it raises the question why not just design your object so the parts can be printed seperately and then bonded together. By getting the slicer to do this, it makes the IDEX printer a more automatic choice. Because being frank, most IDEX printers these days are just used to print 2 colours of the same material, which is a waste of their potential.
Agree, idex is the most flexible (pun intended) choice of printer out there, shame they aren't more common
Yes. If you depart from two of the same material then it requires the design to include some form of interlocking, which in turn requires a significant investment of time. Add that slicers put walls around each material and it’s just a headache.
This looks like a sensible approach.
I have two IDEX printers thinking I might need to print supports with one material and the part with another. I confess I have not used it that way. I cannot even be bothered to print 2 color models with it. More commonly, I have PLA filament loaded in one extruder, and PETG in the other, and I don't have to fool with loading and unloading so often.
But this concept is very interesting and worth thinking upon. Also increases the importance of having 3D CAD that you are familiar with using.
I used to do this in simplify 3D by deliberately overlapping parts. More kludgy than this solution but the bonding between TPU and PLA was solid.
yeah I tried that back on the geeetech, it works but as you say, not as good as this and you're overextruding or whatever.
This is one of those things that makes perfect sense and is extremely cool and useful.
on the dual extruder making alternate lines, I would have thought a lot of the joining materials could just be dual extruded at the same time so what was coming out the extruder was a 50'50 mix of materials. I suppose this is better overall for widely different temperature materials.
There are "Mixing" Hot ends, that intend to print like this, and they just don't work. The Heat Break is meant for one filament at a time.
Finally multi headed printers have an actual use, woohoo! Might actually think about getting one now, otherwise there was no benefit to them (heavier/slower/twice the things to snag on your part/less reliable/typically worse part cooling), but now you can actually use more than 1 material. I might have to make my 6th printer a duel head now that something like that would be useful.
This is great. I hope it makes it to other slicers.
This is exactly why I decided to go with the Prusa XL and with two toolheads. Multi-material (not just multi-color) printing is what separates the top-tier printers when it comes to functional prints.
Oh yeah. I would totally be buying a prusa with multiple toolheads if I had the money (and space lol).
I'm pretty sure this will come into fruition in a very near future.
Incredible how after nearly 40 years Stratasys is still making significant developments to the 3d printing process
Awesome information. I use the lulzbot cura for the laz pro ( I don’t think they are doing anymore updates on it so I’ll have to see how to switch over to this cura)
Great video as always. Fascinating to see how this develops and becomes part of other slicers too.
this is a nice game changer for some complex stuff.
This opens up so many possibilities. I love it. Thanks for sharing ^^
Nice, great Cura feature!
I imagine you could adjust the flexability/stiffnes. Like if some of the harder material lines are set to be longer into the softer material. A density adjustment.
Now that IDEX mod looks a lot more interesting.
PLA and HIPS seam to stick together pretty well, and PETG and TPU bond well, from my experience any way.... just incase this info comes in handy to any one....
Could a variation on this be used to "crossfade" between two different materials, and have the properties of the materials change gradually across the piece?
"It might not seem that interesting as a headline feature"
Me, looking up from the tab I'd opened partway through the video to browse multifilament printers for the first time in my life: "...oh?"
I upgraded my Ender 3 to do 2 filaments, so I'll be trying this. Last time I checked, multi-materials in Cura sucked. Is the octopus piece like 10 pieces, or one? I switched over to PrusaSlicer for my multi-color/material work. You can just select areas on a body and recolor them. Either with a paintbrush or fill tool. When you do those, they extend the second color/material well into the other, so they'll have a good firm bond. A good bond like we're seeing here, except I didn't see an option to specify the joint area details.
This is good though, both tools are great, and I would have liked to keep using Cura.
Very interesting. Thank you for sharing. Cheers 👍😎🇦🇺
Are u kidding? This is HUGE!
I was on the fence when getting a second printer for my GF's place between the Sovol SV04 and the SV06. Absurdly low sale price on the SV06 won me over, given the intermittent use case of the machine, but this new feature makes me regret it a bit.
Hehehe
Hm, could this be used to reinforce a warp-prone material with "fibers" of a less warpy material to make it come out straight where it would otherwise warp?
Not related to the topic comment- I noticed you don’t use “infill line direction” function in Cura.
Change infill type to triangles then put [30, 60] in infill direction. You will be surprised how strong a the print is with this setting on.
I'll have a look at that!
BRB, got to go build myself an IDEX out of my old TEVO Tornado.
..also, stamps ;) There should be more possibilities for stamps with this feature.
That octopusy thingy, does it do anything apart from mesmerizing animations? Does it latch to the surfaces?
I wonder if cura will ever do a model paint feature. Tbh that's the only reason I use prusaslicer.
yeah I've been told at least that this would be very hard to implement, never say never though
I just got a printer and am using the Creality slicer. Not too sure how to use it yet, I just figured out how to remove the "skirt" layers and rotate a model to lay flat. I was concerned about Cura "knowing how" to slice models for my Ender S1 Pro. Should I just ditch the Creality slicer and use Cura? Is the Prusa slicer better for me? Not sure which direction to go or if I should stay with the Creality slicer. Just FYI I use Octoprint on a Raspberry Pi to run my printer and send files to it wirelessly rather than transferring files with an SD card or USB.
yes just use cura, it will fully support the ender 3 S1 pro. Creality slicer is in fact just an older cura. For octoprint, there's a plugin in cura to send automatically too.
@@LostInTech3D Thanks
They added a ton of new profiles but STILL don't have my Sunlu S8. Or any Sunlu printers.
That's on sunlu. If anyone in the sunlu groups wants to do it, they can too.
Finally the Neptune series are supported by default. Will be curious to see how it prints with these profiles
Yeah I've not tried it yet either!
I installed it for 2 minutes then realised I can't set my first layer temp to anything above or below my printing temp, the small layer temp setting under "cooling" that they just added broke all my profiles. Using Prusa slicer till it's fixed and until they fix seams too even though it's far slower with comparable settings. They (seams) have been awful since aracne was released.
I am in the "privileged" group of people who have a multi material printer, I wish I had a FUNCTIONING multi material printer though. I thought I read in the notes that this release does not include the improved tree supports from the alpha.
You are correct, the tree supports are not ready for release yet apparently 😉
I think they said hopefully 5.4 will have it
@@travistucker7317 Hopefully, it's the reason I haven't bothered upgrading to this version.
@@OrlanDave me too, I'm using prusa 2.6 now more than anything for this reason
This is fantastic, but before it gets mainstream we need to solve the nozzle problem. Takes too long to switch between materials. I have ideas but not enough skills to implement 😅 need to learn to code 😛
I am about to buy an X1 Carbon and AMS, its a pity it doesent run Marlin although I dont think it will be long before Bambu Lab implements this feature as its been out for 3 months already!
Would definitely work for some stuff but imo tpu is one of the main materials one would want to use in multi material prints and unfortunately the bambu ams doesn't work with tpu.
@@user-tj7xr6xd9z it works with less flexible TPU like 95a relatively well, stuff like ninjaflex is a no go though.
@@Smokinjoewhite yeah until it doesn't lol
It's pretty cool. I'm curious, do you edit your own videos?
yup, I do
Are there plans to implement this in PrusaSlicer or SuperSlicer?
I also got the Sovol SV04 and would like to use it in PrusaSlicer/SuperSlicer.
ok this is a verry cool feature. but important question.
does it finally do this for bridging now aswel? or does cura still suck?
last time i have printed something (quite a while ago) bridging was still done like printing is magic.
no overlap what so ever. expecting a large bridge to adhear to 1 or 2 WALLS. not even entering the infil or whatever.
if you had any sort of linear advance then bridges just didn't work because it stops extruding before the end of a move.
For IDEX printers, this is probably great. Can you imagine the filament waste on a Bambu X1C? :D
Updates like this are hard on my personal life. My wife is going to leave me if I buy another printer but now I need an IDEX so…
Well, you'll certainly be justified then, because she'll take half of the printers you already have :D
Your later hammer has striking looks.... ;)
man this has me REALLY wishing the Bambu x1c had Cura support
......wait, it doesn't??
@@LostInTech3D nope, there's no official support for any slicer besides bambu studio; the only community profile for cura I've seen is maybe three weeks old, doesn't have support for most of the printer's features, and carries a risk of crashing your bed into the bottom of the printer 😅
I will have to see if my Bebo two is up to the task
Great video!
Thank you 👍
I think it's awesome, now people Lan do much more awesome stuff in 3d printing than before and that's only by new software development and no need for more special 3d printers to buy. 🤔👍
This really makes me want a multi material printer. I did some experiments with switching between PLA and TPU and was pretty happy with it but adhesion was imperfect so I added some simple ledges.
I think the biggest impact of this will be in letting designers tweak their designs repeatedly without needing to redo fancy dovetails joints.
I’m imagining what it would be like to design a compact hinge, and then decide to change its shape and have to redo a dovetail over and over.
How did you like the Neptune 3 plus profile?
I've not actually tried it yet, I was using my own right up to the review. I'll be giving it a go soon!
@@LostInTech3D I have mine pre ordered can't wait 🤙🏻
That's not most sovols, that's half of them.
Still missing tenlog.
does 5.3 allow you to alternate outer wall direction on printers without multiple print heads? alwsy been a feature ive wanted.
I don't think so..
Not something I'll ever need I think, despite having a dual extruder on my A10M. When Cura integrates arc overhangs as Prusia now does, or uses conical slicing or non planar slicing, then I'll get excited.
But how do you create a file to take advantage of this feature? I am using Fusion and every time I create the file when I put it in Cura with that feature it just slices it as one material. I could really use some help.
Basically a version of this forum.snapmaker.com/t/step-by-step-creating-a-two-color-snapmaker-print-from-fusion-360-to-luban-with-the-dual-extruder/30351
The profile comparison has been implemented in cura for years now wym? Am I missing something?
PCBWay ahs awesome prices for things like CNC machining and metal 3D printing. The killer is shipping to the US. I quoted a small bracket I designed to mount a Hemera Revo XS to my Ender 3 V2 and it was like $40 for the bracket and almost $70 to ship to the US. LOL no.
It's much cheaper to the UK, weird! I was planning on making a bracket too 😁
Hey Will, thx so much for bringing this to our attention. May we know which kind of shipping option you choosed? There are some economical options you may try: EMS, FedEx-IP, etc
I would like to see strange combinations ABS and silk PLA, why? Why not?? 😅
Actually silk would be pretty interesting as it swells 🤔
I tried it last month and it was super buggy. Did they fix the bugs already?
If so I'd love to give it another try. It had really cool tree supports.
5.3 is extremely buggy. I would skip it for now.
@@Smokinjoewhite yea, I didn't think it would be fixed yet, but I was curious.
Super clever.
yes but can it output files for the palette?
Why wouldn't it? I've not used the palette
@@LostInTech3D the format is special so it can communicate with the machine. i believe it is .mcfx for it
great video. thks
My 5.3 stopped slicing when they dropped 5.4 beta, which is horrible at printing walls.
try again, 5.4 is out and apparently some slicing issues are fixed
Huh, they finally added the Neptunes, I had to change the files to get my EN2S shown and working.
How does this work?
Does cura 5.3 support mmu2s?
I can't see why it wouldn't, although you would have to copy over the tool change gcode commands
2:18 A system of cells interlinked within cells interlinked within cells interlinked within one stem... And dreadfully distinct
If it was the 1st of April I would say good one but lucky it didn't then
"pictures for those of us who are allergic to equations" - equations are pictures too, just very confusing ones.
I prefer pictures I can comprehend though...
You're welcome. 😆
I saw Geeetech A10M listed there and thought, "gee, I wish my printer worked more than 5 minutes in multi material mode."
It always clogs. It has a single combining head and the design of it is extremely flawed. I've never had it work well at all.
It's weird how mine works fine and everyone else's doesn't. I'm not complaining 🤣
I probably got extremely unlucky. Geeetech to their credit sent me a second mixing hot end. It clogged irrevocably both times.
@LinusTechTips Alex you interested? (assuming you haven't seen this in the 9+ days it's been out)
"Scads" is a perfectly cromulent word!
wow Great
But it does!
haha, yes, you got me
^^ Spoiler warning ^^
Yet they still can't enable antialiasing so print preview doesn't look so horrible.
Now I can make my own gunpla for reals
Cells within cells interlinked
who are you calling a flexible sucker?
Stamps. I'm thinking stamps.
😵cells within cells interlinked....
I'm not keen on melding together different materials. It's exactly the sort of thing which Apple does, making product impossible to repair or recycle. There's almost always a better way to fix together parts securely but not permanently.
It's not a chemical bond, so I think in some ways it's easier to undo with force than for example glue. The paper details the forces involved.
I'd rather have a paint on Z seam and supports than this.
subtitles are not direct to what is being said in audio. Threw me way off.
It's not far off, it's the script I read. There should be an automatic subtitles option too.
Highlighting a patron's Cura contributions SPECIFICALLY in the video? More like Lost in Bias.
thought about naming you, you got away lightly
Do you have a link to both hammer files?