14700K VS 7700X - Counter Strike 2

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2024
  • Specs:
    14700K VS 7700X
    RTX 3070
    32GB DDR5 6000MHZ
    All settings are at low at performance mode 1080p.
    No fps loss due to capturing with a dedicated capture card and second PC.
    In this video, we'll be putting the powerful 14700K VS 7700X processor and the RTX 3070 graphics card to the test. We'll be diving into the details of how these components work together to deliver optimal gaming performance.
    For more benchmarks on any game, here is the list of components i have or can get to benchmark with:
    CPUs:
    Ryzen 7 7800X3D
    i7 13700k
    i9 11900K
    i7 11700F
    i5 10400F
    i3 10100F
    Ryzen 9 3900X
    Ryzen 5 3600
    i7 8700k
    I7 6700K
    i7 4770
    i5 4460
    GPUs:
    RX 6600
    GTX 1080
    RTX 3090
    RTX 3070
    RX 470
    GTX 770
    GTX 960

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @davidkupr_fut6865
    @davidkupr_fut6865 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can u do 7800x3d vs 7700x on the finals cause there is no info literally on that game.does the game benefit from 3d cache

    • @t7274
      @t7274 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It does benefit from the 3D cache but you still get 200+ with the 7700x if you have 6000c30-38-38 ram. I’ve tested a 7600 with the same ram and pbo enabled. The 7600 gets 200 average but it really depends on the map. Lowest I saw it dip with A LOT of action was 160 or so. When the game first starts in spawn it gets 230. The game pretty much scales with everything.

    • @t7274
      @t7274 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What gpu are you pairing the cpu with? What resolution and what in game settings? You could be gpu bound with a 7700

    • @davidkupr_fut6865
      @davidkupr_fut6865 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@t7274 i want to buy 7800x3d+7900xtx i play in 1440p 170hz but i was watching ottr (he have 78000x3d and 4090)and his fps most of the time around 200 its map dependend too but sometimes it can go lower to even 140-160 and the new kyoto map is very cpu heavy and its nowhere near to stable 200 it most of the time in range of 130-140-200

    • @davidkupr_fut6865
      @davidkupr_fut6865 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@t7274 also to add i know there is 9000 x3d chips probably launch at the end of the year but honestly dont want to wait another 6 months for it to release and then wait for another 3 months to price drop🤣just rather get am 5 system and then upgrade if needed

    • @t7274
      @t7274 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve never seen the 7600 build dip down to 130. Ottr is not a hardware enthusiast and it’s completely possible that he doesn’t have XMP enabled or doesn’t have the 6000c30-38-38 ram. Yes, that ram is very important and hardware unboxed has done a video on it. He’s also streaming, could have a corrupted OS, or just doesn’t have a clean windows. The 7800x3D with correct setup gets more than 200 average and I KNOW this. If you’re playing on mostly low settings with a 7900x, then I’d just get the x3D. If you want to save money then just get a 7700 now and MAKE SURE to get the 6000c30-38-38 ram. The 7600 build was using the gskill flarex expo.

  • @sweatybutter1091
    @sweatybutter1091 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    your not comparing similar cpus at all you should be doning the 7800x3d with the 14700k that would be the same budget range.

    • @aljerbench
      @aljerbench  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it is not about the budget, it is to inform people. The 7800X3D vs 14700K has already been done by me

  • @Zalcoz
    @Zalcoz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Which cooler du tou use with 7800x3d?

    • @shockat5070
      @shockat5070 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is not 7800x3d

    • @Zalcoz
      @Zalcoz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shockat5070 i know, But he has vids with it

    • @malik-mahdi
      @malik-mahdi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the best u can get cuz anything under 150$ would cause it to be damaged

    • @aljerbench
      @aljerbench  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I use the be quiet! Pure Rock 2 Black

    • @aljerbench
      @aljerbench  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it is 40 euros where i live

  • @crylune
    @crylune 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    7700X is a horrible value CPU and the 14700K sweeps the floor with it.

    • @daflaming4312
      @daflaming4312 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      First of all the 14700k and the 7700x are not the counter parts to each other in fact amd hasn’t made the counters to 14th gen and the 14700k cost 100 dollars more 🗿7700x is way better

    • @crylune
      @crylune 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@daflaming4312 Funny of you to talk about cost. Recall Zen 4 launch. Dumb pricing on AMD's part and expensive platform. Meanwhile Intel's i9 was $100 cheaper and works on an existing platform.

    • @venomus9286
      @venomus9286 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@crylune 7700X might not be that great, but at least its not a dead platform stucked with 14th gen cpus. People can just upgrade to 7800X3D and obliterate any of the Intel cpus or even upcoming 9800X3D, while Intel users have to buy the new motherboard to get the upcoming cpus. There are pros and cons to each. But I do agree that 7700X doesnt make much sense when 7600/7600X exists for less money and performs identical.

    • @daflaming4312
      @daflaming4312 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@crylune funny how the direct counters to the Ryzen 7 7700x which are the 12700k and the 13700k had a launch price of $409 and $419 compared to $399 for the 7700x lmaoo but it's funny how you are trying to downplay a CPU while it's going up against a CPU it wasn't meant to go up against lol my comment is reflecting on the fact that you aren't being fair and the 7700x is better value then 14700k lmaoo

    • @daflaming4312
      @daflaming4312 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@crylune and please do your research the 7700x isn't on a dead platform unlike the 14700k which is on a dead platform, again better value and the 7800x3d sweeps the floor with the 14700k and matches the 14900k for $399 usually on sale around me for $350 and under lmaoo